Ultra High Temperature Latent Heat Energy Storage and Thermophotovoltaic Energy Conversion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ultra High Temperature Latent Heat Energy Storage and Thermophotovoltaic Energy Conversion Ultra high temperature latent heat energy storage and thermophotovoltaic energy conversion Alejandro Datas(*), Alba Ramos, Antonio Martí, Carlos del Cañizo and Antonio Luque Instituto de Energía Solar – Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain (*) corresponding autor: [email protected] Keywords: LHTES (latent heat thermal energy storage), high temperature, thermophotovoltaics, silicon, boron, PCM (phase change materials), CSP (concentrated solar power). Abstract A conceptual energy storage system design that utilizes ultra high temperature phase change materials is presented. In this system, the energy is stored in the form of latent heat and converted to electricity upon demand by TPV (thermophotovoltaic) cells. Silicon is considered in this study as PCM (phase change material) due to its extremely high latent heat (1800 J/g), melting point (1410ºC), thermal conductivity (~25 W/m-K), low cost (less than $2/kg or $4/kWh) and abundance on earth. The proposed system enables an enormous thermal energy storage density of ~ 1 MWh/m3, which is 10-20 times higher than that of lead-acid batteries, 2-6 times than that of Li-ion batteries and 5-10 times than that of the current state of the art TES systems utilized in CSP (concentrated solar power) applications. The discharge efficiency of the system is ultimately determined by the TPV converter, which theoretically can exceed 50%. However, realistic discharge efficiencies utilizing single junction TPV cells are in the range of 20-45%, depending on the semiconductor bandgap and quality, and the photon recycling efficiency. This concept has the 3 potential to achieve output electric energy densities in the range of 200-450 kWhe/m , which is comparable to the best performing state of the art Lithium-ion batteries. Nomenclature list Ac TPV cells total area (m2) cps heat capacity of solid PCM (J/g-K) c pl heat capacity of liquid PCM (J/g-K) c speed of light (m/s) E radiative energy flux (W/m2-sr) Etot energy stored instantaneously in the PCM in the form of specific and latent heat (J) h Plank constant (Js) k Boltzmann constant (J/K) kl thermal conductivity of liquid PCM (W/m-K) ks thermal conductivity of solid PCM (W/m-K) L container length (m) L f latent heat (J/g) N photon flux (#photons/m2-sr-sec) ns refraction index of the semiconductor Pel TPV output electrical power (W) Ql heat flux in the liquid PCM (W) Qs heat flux in the solid PCM (W) R1 distance from center to the emitter (m) R2 distance from center to the outer container wall (m) rm distance from center to the solid-liquid front (m) t time (s) T1 temperature at the emitter (K) T2 temperature at PCM-wall boundary (K) Tm melting temperature of PCM (K) Tc TPV cells temperature (K) V TPV cell voltage (V) G TPV cell semiconductor bandgap (eV) photon energy (eV) density (g/m3) BR reflectivity of the back-surface reflector in TPV cell int internal photoluminescence quantum efficiency of the TPV cell ext external photoluminescence quantum efficiency of the TPV cell 1 Introduction LHTES (latent heat thermal energy storage) employs energy to cause the phase change transition in a material that subsequently stores energy in the form of latent heat. That material is referred to as PCM (phase change material) and is the key element determining the overall performance of the storage system. PCMs promises one of the highest energy densities and lowest costs of existing TES materials [1], [2]. However, current LHTES solutions are subject to a very low heat extraction rate from the storage medium, which is attributed to the low solid-phase thermal conductivity and moderate latent heat of PCMs. Current research efforts focus on developing relatively sophisticated PCM encapsulation so that thermal conductivity is notably enhanced [1], [3]–[6]. However, these strategies inherently have a lower energy density potential, since part of the volume is dedicated to the PCM host. An alternative solution consists of directly using PCMs with higher thermal conductivity and latent heat. As a general rule, the heat of fusion of materials increases with melting temperature [1], [7]; thus, there is an interest on moving towards higher melting point PCMs. However, in TES for power generation there is a maximum temperature imposed by the heat transfer fluid (HTF) that is used to carry the heat from the PCM to the heat engine, which degrades at high temperatures. Maximum temperatures are typically below 500 ºC [8]. Other technological options exist though; such as thermophotovoltaics (TPV) [9], [10], thermionic [11] or hybrid thermionic-photovoltaic [12] devices that do not require HTFs and consequently have the potential to operate at extraordinary high temperatures. Previous works have proposed conceptual system designs for solar thermal energy storage based on very high melting point PCMs, such as pure silicon and boron (melting points of 1410ºC and 2076ºC, respectively) and TPV converters [13]–[19]. The first experiments on molten silicon for TES applications have been recently carried out at the University of South California with the aim of developing a solar thermal propulsion system for microsatellites [20]. The container damage due to freezing expansion of pure silicon was the most relevant engineering concern. Besides, a highly asymmetric freezing profile was observed due to the use of non-adiabatic container walls, which produced regions of molten silicon encased in solid silicon that ultimately resulted in high stress and container damage. It is worth noting that these issues could be solved in future designs by several means, such as using quasi-adiabatic container walls, i.e. improved container thermal insulation, or reducing the container fill factor [20]. In the opinion of the authors, an especially interesting solution consists on using silicon alloys instead of pure silicon, in order to reduce the freezing expansion coefficient of the PCM. We believe that, among all the possibilities, the silicon- boron system is particularly interesting due to the extremely high latent heat of boron (4650 J/g) and the moderately low melting temperature (1385ºC) for the eutectic Si0.92B0.08 [21], [22]. Besides, the silicon lattice parameter contracts upon alloying with boron [21], which suggests that freezing expansion issues could be eliminated. Other practical concern is the thermo-chemical compatibility between the container and the PCM at those high temperatures. A variety of refractory materials have been extensively used for casting solidification of all kind of metals at high temperatures, including silicon and boron. Some examples are BN (used in [20]) SiC and Si3N4. In these cases, important selection criteria are the wetability, solubility and reactivity of the container with the PCM, along with evaporation and oxidation of the PCM in oxygen-rich atmospheres. Thus, it is still needed an extensive research on the compatibility of these materials for the particular application of LHTES, especially concerning cycling and long term reliability. In this work we present a conceptual LHTES system design for both S2H2P (solar-to-heat-to- power), commonly referred to as CSP (concentrated solar power), and P2H2P (power-to-heat-to- power) applications. Notice that other P2H2P concepts have been previously proposed to store the excess of electricity in the grid and co-generate heat and electricity [23]. The concept presented in this paper is based on the same operation principles than previously proposed systems in [13]–[19], i.e. high temperature PCM and TPV energy conversion. The proposed system differentiates from the previous designs in its geometrical configuration, which facilitates the thermal insulation of the PCM and the integration of an independent (mobile) TPV generator, providing a tunable power discharge rate (from zero to full-discharge mode). We assess this concept theoretically to predict its performance under several assumptions, which range from idealistic (to provide the upper bounds of this concept) to more realistic, to provide its actual short-term potential. 2 System description Figure 1 shows two possible configurations of the LHTES system presented in this paper for P2H2P [24] (left-hand side) and S2H2P or CSP (right-hand side) applications. In the P2H2P case, an electric heating system is used for melting the PCM. Among all the possible options, an inductive electric heater could be used if the PCM is magnetic or electrically conductive (e.g. iron or metallurgical silicon). Other options include resistive or microwave heating. In any case, electrical energy is stored in the form of the latent heat within the PCM. In the S2H2P case (right-hand side in Figure 1); concentrated solar power heats the inner walls of the vessel containing the PCM. If the sunlight concentration factor is high enough [13], [14] (above 1000 suns) the solar heat will produce the melting of the PCM and consequently, solar energy will be stored in the form of latent heat. Other arrangements not illustrated in this paper may use the waste heat from high temperature industrial processes or other kinds of electric heating. In both cases of Figure 1 the stored heat is released in the form of electricity by using a TPV converter, which comprises a number of infrared sensitive photovoltaic cells that directly produce electricity from radiant heat. In contrast to conventional heat engines, the contact-less nature of TPV converters enable extremely high temperature operation, which is essential for this kind of systems. Besides, TPV can provide extremely high power densities (power-to-weight and power-to- volume ratio) at low maintenance costs (neither moving parts nor working fluids within the converter) along with silent operation, which is important for decentralized ES applications. Furthermore, the TPV conversion efficiency is very high, potentially exceeding 50% due to the possibility of sub-bandgap photon recycling, which can be accomplished, for instance, by using reflectors in the back side of the TPV cells [25].
Recommended publications
  • Specific Energy Limit and Its Influence on the Nature of Black Holes Javier Viaña
    Specific Energy Limit and its Influence on the Nature of Black Holes Javier Viaña To cite this version: Javier Viaña. Specific Energy Limit and its Influence on the Nature of Black Holes. 2021. hal- 03322333 HAL Id: hal-03322333 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03322333 Preprint submitted on 19 Aug 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 16th of August of 2021 Specific Energy Limit and its Influence on the Nature of Black Holes Javier Viaña [0000-0002-0563-784X] University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH 45219, USA [email protected] What if the universe has a limit on the amount of energy that a certain mass can have? This article explores this possibility and suggests a theory for the creation and nature of black holes based on an energetic limit. The Specific Energy Limit Energy is an extensive property, and we know that as we add more mass to a given system, we can easily increase its energy. Specific energy on the other hand is an intensive property. It is defined as the energy divided by the mass and it is measured in units of J/kg.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and the Hydrogen Economy
    Energy and the Hydrogen Economy Ulf Bossel Fuel Cell Consultant Morgenacherstrasse 2F CH-5452 Oberrohrdorf / Switzerland +41-56-496-7292 and Baldur Eliasson ABB Switzerland Ltd. Corporate Research CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil / Switzerland Abstract Between production and use any commercial product is subject to the following processes: packaging, transportation, storage and transfer. The same is true for hydrogen in a “Hydrogen Economy”. Hydrogen has to be packaged by compression or liquefaction, it has to be transported by surface vehicles or pipelines, it has to be stored and transferred. Generated by electrolysis or chemistry, the fuel gas has to go through theses market procedures before it can be used by the customer, even if it is produced locally at filling stations. As there are no environmental or energetic advantages in producing hydrogen from natural gas or other hydrocarbons, we do not consider this option, although hydrogen can be chemically synthesized at relative low cost. In the past, hydrogen production and hydrogen use have been addressed by many, assuming that hydrogen gas is just another gaseous energy carrier and that it can be handled much like natural gas in today’s energy economy. With this study we present an analysis of the energy required to operate a pure hydrogen economy. High-grade electricity from renewable or nuclear sources is needed not only to generate hydrogen, but also for all other essential steps of a hydrogen economy. But because of the molecular structure of hydrogen, a hydrogen infrastructure is much more energy-intensive than a natural gas economy. In this study, the energy consumed by each stage is related to the energy content (higher heating value HHV) of the delivered hydrogen itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage and Superconducting Self-Supplied Electromagnetic Launcher★
    Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 20901 (2017) THE EUROPEAN © EDP Sciences, 2017 PHYSICAL JOURNAL DOI: 10.1051/epjap/2017160452 APPLIED PHYSICS Regular Article Superconducting magnetic energy storage and superconducting self-supplied electromagnetic launcher★ Jérémie Ciceron*, Arnaud Badel, and Pascal Tixador Institut Néel, G2ELab CNRS/Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France Received: 5 December 2016 / Received in final form: 8 April 2017 / Accepted: 16 August 2017 Abstract. Superconductors can be used to build energy storage systems called Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES), which are promising as inductive pulse power source and suitable for powering electromagnetic launchers. The second generation of high critical temperature superconductors is called coated conductors or REBCO (Rare Earth Barium Copper Oxide) tapes. Their current carrying capability in high magnetic field and their thermal stability are expanding the SMES application field. The BOSSE (Bobine Supraconductrice pour le Stockage d’Energie) project aims to develop and to master the use of these superconducting tapes through two prototypes. The first one is a SMES with high energy density. Thanks to the performances of REBCO tapes, the volume energy and specific energy of existing SMES systems can be surpassed. A study has been undertaken to make the best use of the REBCO tapes and to determine the most adapted topology in order to reach our objective, which is to beat the world record of mass energy density for a superconducting coil. This objective is conflicting with the classical strategies of superconducting coil protection. A different protection approach is proposed. The second prototype of the BOSSE project is a small-scale demonstrator of a Superconducting Self-Supplied Electromagnetic Launcher (S3EL), in which a SMES is integrated around the launcher which benefits from the generated magnetic field to increase the thrust applied to the projectile.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Energy
    Quantum Mechanics_Specific energy Specific energy SI unit J/kg In SI base units m2/s2 Derivations from other quantities e = E/m Energy density has tables of specific energies of devices and materials. Specific energy is energy per unit mass. (It is also sometimes called "energy density," though "energy density" more precisely means energy per unit volume.) It is used to quantify, for example, stored heat or other thermodynamic propertiesof substances such as specific internal energy, specific enthalpy, specific Gibbs free energy, and specific Helmholtz free energy. It may also be used for the kinetic energy or potential energy of a body. Specific energy is an intensive property, whereas energy and mass are extensive properties. The SI unit for specific energy is the joule per kilogram (J/kg). Other units still in use in some contexts are the kilocalorie per gram (Cal/g or kcal/g), mostly in food-related topics, watt hours per kilogram in the field of batteries, and theImperial unit BTU per pound (BTU/lb), in some engineering and applied technical fields.[1] The gray and sievert are specialized measures for specific energy absorbed by body tissues in the form of radiation. The following table shows the factors for converting to J/kg: Unit SI equivalent kcal/g[2] 4.184 MJ/kg Wh/kg 3.6 kJ/kg kWh/kg 3.6 MJ/kg Btu/lb[3] 2.326 kJ/kg Btu/lb[4] ca. 2.32444 kJ/kg The concept of specific energy is related to but distinct from the chemical notion of molar energy, that is energy per mole of a substance.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI)
    NAT'L INST. OF STAND & TECH NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST Special Publication 330 2001 Edition The International System of Units (SI) 4. Barry N. Taylor, Editor r A o o L57 330 2oOI rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cell to Battery System in Bevs: Analysis of System Packing Efficiency and Cell Types
    Article From Cell to Battery System in BEVs: Analysis of System Packing Efficiency and Cell Types Hendrik Löbberding 1,* , Saskia Wessel 2, Christian Offermanns 1 , Mario Kehrer 1 , Johannes Rother 3, Heiner Heimes 1 and Achim Kampker 1 1 Chair for Production Engineering of E-Mobility Components, RWTH Aachen University, 52064 Aachen, Germany; c.off[email protected] (C.O.); [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (H.H.); [email protected] (A.K.) 2 Fraunhofer IPT, 48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52072 Aachen, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 10 December 2020 Abstract: The motivation of this paper is to identify possible directions for future developments in the battery system structure for BEVs to help choosing the right cell for a system. A standard battery system that powers electrified vehicles is composed of many individual battery cells, modules and forms a system. Each of these levels have a natural tendency to have a decreased energy density and specific energy compared to their predecessor. This however, is an important factor for the size of the battery system and ultimately, cost and range of the electric vehicle. This study investigated the trends of 25 commercially available BEVs of the years 2010 to 2019 regarding their change in energy density and specific energy of from cell to module to system. Systems are improving. However, specific energy is improving more than energy density.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Overview Energy
    UNIT SPECIFIC RESOURCES TEACHER RESOURCES IV UNIT OVERVIEW ENERGY Listed below is a summary of the activities in this unit. Note that the total teaching time is listed as 23-35 periods of approximately 45 to 50 minutes (approximately 5-7 weeks). Activity Advance Teaching Topics Assessment Description Preparation Periods 1. Investigation: Home Energy Use Energy, energy use, Prepare Student E&T QC A5 1–2 Students brainstorm the uses of energy energy effciency, Sheets. in the home and become aware of trade-off everyday energy consumption. They LITERACY compare the features of two homes and suggest which one consumes less energy. Students then develop an operational defnition of energy effciency. 2. Laboratory: Drive a Nail Kinetic energy, PCI Proc. 2–3 Students are introduced to the potential energy, concepts of kinetic and gravitational gravitational potential energy. They design and potential energy, conduct an experiment to drop energy transfer and metal rods of different masses from transformation, different heights to drive a nail into variables a foam block. This activity allows LITERACY students to explore energy transfer, the relationship of gravitational potential energy to mass and height, and the transformation of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy. 3. Role Play: Roller Coaster Energy Kinetic energy, Prepare Student EXP: A1 1–2 Students further examine energy potential energy, Sheet. transformations between gravitational energy transfer and potential energy and kinetic energy in transformation the context of a common experience— namely, roller coasters. Students are introduced to the idea that some energy is transformed into thermal energy and sound during energy transformations. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Temperature Analysis in Grinding
    Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 44, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3533 Energy and temperature analysis in grinding W.B. Rowel, M.N. Morganl, A. Batakol & T. Jin2 I School of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, UK 2 S.I.MS. CranJield University, UK Abstract Energy consumption and dissipation are discussed, leading into a thermal model for grinding. The analysis developed over many years applies to shallow-cut conventional grinding processes and also to deep grinding processes. Energy analysis provides insights into the grinding process and suggests avenues for process improvements. The thermal model provides a good estimation of contact temperatures as well as temperatures on the finish surface. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how operational efficiency, component quality and removal rates are affected by process conditions. Examples are included for High Efficiency Deep Grinding (HEDG). HEDG is defined as deep grinding at high workspeeds and very high removal rates. Tawakoli [20], Klocke [21]. The contact between the workpiece and wheel is represented as a circular arc. Experiments show that high removal rates and absence of thermal damage can be achieved. HEDG can achieve low specific grinding energy compared with shallow grinding and creep grinding. The chips take away most of the heat generated in the grinding process. As in creep grinding, bum-out of the coolant causes a steep rise in contact temperature of the workpiece. 1 Introduction Cost, quality and productivity in grinding processes are all dependent on energy consumption and process efficiency. In an inefficient process, excessive heat leads to increased temperature rise in the workpiece causing problems with surface integrity and require more frequent interruptions of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 112: the Physics of Stars Class 6 Notes: Internal Energy And
    Astronomy 112: The Physics of Stars Class 6 Notes: Internal Energy and Radiative Transfer In the last class we used the kinetic theory of gasses to understand the pressure of stellar material. The kinetic view is essential to generalizing the concept of pressure to the environ- ments found in stars, where gas can be relativistic, degenerate, or both. The goal of today’s class is to extend that kinetic picture by thinking about pressure in stars in terms of the associated energy content of the gas. This will let us understand how the energy flow in stars interacts with gas pressure, a crucial step toward building stellar models. I. Pressure and Energy A. The Relationship Between Pressure and Internal Energy The fundamental object we dealt with in the last class was the distribution of particle mometa, dn(p)/dp, which we calculated from the Boltzmann distribu- tion. Given this, we could compute the pressure. However, this distribution also corresponds to a specific energy content, since for particles that don’t have inter- nal energy states, internal energy is just the kinetic energy of particle motions. Given a distribution of particle momenta dn(p)/dp in some volume of space, the corresponding density of energy within that volume of space is Z ∞ dn(p) e = (p) dp, 0 dp where (p) is the energy of a particle with momentum p. It is often more conve- nient to think about the energy per unit mass than the energy per unit volume. The energy per unit mass is just e divided by the density: 1 Z ∞ dn(p) u = (p) dp.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Properties of Molecular Oxygen
    NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REPORT 2611 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF MOLECULAR OXYGEN tv Harold ¥, Woolley Themodynamics Section Division of Heat and Power U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Sinclair Weeks, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS A. V. Astin, Director THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The scope of activities of the National Bureau of Standards is suggested in the following listing of the divisions and sections engaged in technical work. In general, each section is engaged in special- ized research, development, and engineering in the field indicated by its title. A brief description of the activities, and of the resultant reports and publications, appears on the inside of the back cover of this report. Electricity. Resistance Measurements. Inductance and Capacitance. Electrical Instruments. Magnetic Measurements. Applied Electricity. Electrochemistry. Optics and Metrology. Photometry and Colorimetry. Optical Instruments. Photographic Technology. Length. Gage. Heat and Power. Temperature Measurements. Thermodynamics. Cryogenics. Engines and Lubrication. Engine Fuels. Cryogenic Engineering. Atomic and Radiation Physics. Spectroscopy. Radiometry. Mass Spectrometry. Solid State Physics. Electron Physics. Atomic Physics. Neutron Measurements. Infrared Spectroscopy. Nuclear Physics. Radioactivity. X-Rays. Betatron. Nucleonic Instrumentation. Radio- logical Equipment. Atomic Energy Commission Instruments Branch. Chemistry. Organic Coatings. Surface Cheipistry. Organic Chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Data
    ..................................APPENDIX A Thermodynamic data A.l Introduction The thermodynamic tables presented here for enthalpy and internal energy differ from those that are usually available, since they incorporate the enthalpy of formation. This means that there is no need for separate tabulations of calorific values, and it will be found that energy balances for combustion calculations are greatly simplified. The enthalpy of formation (t-.Hf) is perhaps more familiar to physical chemists than to engineers. The enthalpy of formation ( t-.Hf) of a substance is the standard reaction enthalpy for the formation of the compound from its elements in their reference state. The reference state of an element is its most stable state (for example, carbon atoms, but oxygen molecules) at a specified temperature and pressure, usually 298.15 K and a pressure of l bar. In the case of atoms that can exist in different forms, it is necessary to specify their form, for example, carbon is as graphite, not diamond. Combustion calculations are most readily undertaken by using absolute (some­ times known as sensible) internal energies or enthalpy. In steady-flow systems where there is displacement work then enthalpy should be used; this has been illustrated by figure 3.8. When there is no displacement work then internal energy should be used (figure 3.7). Consider now figure 3.8 in more detail. With an adiabatic combustion process from reactants (R) to products (P) the enthalpy is constant, but there is a substantial rise in temperature: (A.l) In the case of the isothermal combustion process (IR ~ IP) the temperature (T) is obviously constant, and the difference in enthalpy corresponds to the isobaric calorific value (-t-.Jfi,): t-.H~ = HR .T- HP,T (A.2) 582 Thermodynamic data A.2 Thermodynamic principles In the following sections, it will be seen how the thermodynamic data for internal energy, enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs function can all be determined from measurements of heat capacity and phase change enthalpies (or internal energies).
    [Show full text]