History As Identity Politics: the Case of Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany *

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History As Identity Politics: the Case of Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany * History As Identity Politics: The Case of Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany * Karl Kügle Most historians—and musicologists—will probably agree that the concepts of ‘history’ in general, and of ‘music history’ in particular, as we understand them today, are the result of seismic epistemological shifts that took place mostly during the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries. Concerning ‘music history,’ one might further agree that the dominant, Austro-Germanic master narrative of ‘music history’ that fills our introductory music text books only reached a point of crystallization during the last quarter of the nineteenth century, suggesting a somewhat more fluid situation in preceding decades.1 ‘History’ and other late eighteenth and nineteenth-century constructions have undergone manifold and substantial critiques since the 1960s and 1970s; most significantly for the following discussion, post- structuralism pointed to the nexus between discourse and power.2 If we apply this premise to the discourse of ‘music history,’ the question of the relations between the origins of music history in nineteenth-century Germany, and the contingent political interests, needs to be reconsidered. Musicology, probably due to its intimate connection with these very issues, has been slow in tackling the question, notwithstanding the fact that a considerable body of research on ‘historicism’ and ‘canon formation’ is currently available. If interest in ‘historicism’ was first voiced by German scholars around Walter Wiora, most prominently among them, Carl * Earlier versions of this paper were read at the International Conference on Nineteenth-Century Music, Royal Holloway, University of London, 2000, at the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Musicological Society (Toronto, Canada, 2–5 November 2000), and at the 24th National Conference of the Musicological Society of Australia (University of Melbourne, 18–22 April 2001). I am grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for a Habilitationsstipendium (1996–98) and to the University of Hong Kong for a Research Initiation Grant (1998–2000) enabling me to conduct the research for this article in the context of a larger book project on The ‘Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung’ (Leipzig, 1863–1882): Music, Identity and Politics in a German Music Journal of the Nineteenth Century (forthcoming). 1 For a detailed exploration supporting this view, see my forthcoming monograph on The ‘Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung’ (Leipzig, 1863–1882). 2 See, as the starting point for much of what follows, Michel Foucault, Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines (Paris: Gallimard, 1966). For an application of these ideas to, for example, the area of justice, see Michel Foucault, Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison (Paris: Gallimard, 1975). For a fundamental critique of historiographical writing, with special emphasis on the nineteenth century, see Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973); see also Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987). 96 Context 22 (Spring 2001) Dahlhaus, more recently, relations between power and discourse have been a major area of concern for Anglo-Saxon and North American musicologists.3 Despite all this activity, it remains a fact that almost all research in the area tends to focus on the early nineteenth century (up to 1848/9), or the late decades of the nineteenth century (from ca. 1880 onward); perhaps subconsciously emulating the structure of the symphonic canon, the ‘barren’ years (to paraphrase Dahlhaus’s now sufficiently challenged claim)4 from around 1850 to 1880 continue to attract relatively little attention. They seem to me, however, to sit at a crucial juncture in the evolution of the modern notion of ‘music history.’ In the following, I propose to trace a few previously unacknowledged links between writing music history, ideology, and politics in the German-speaking lands during the 1850s, 1860s and 1870s. I hope to show that the decisive move from a ‘Romantic’ pre-1848 view of music history toward the prevailing ‘modernist’ one was first made in the early 1850s by a small and select elite, and I aim to elucidate a few of the political and ideological premises that underlie this seemingly autonomous discursive shift in the approach to history at large, and the history of music in particular. Defining Historicism Before launching into the details of such an inquiry, it may be useful to pause for a moment to reflect on the changing definitions and resulting meanings of the terms ‘history’ and ‘historicism,’ and their respective implications, as far as they apply to the nineteenth century and, in particular, the German-speaking parts of Central Europe.5 Unlike in previous centuries, ‘history,’ since the Enlightenment, increasingly came to be conceived as a full and verifiable reconstruction of the past, to be achieved (as much as possible) by the tools of critical scholarship, as opposed to a narrative, conditioned by the selective and whimsical qualities of individual and collective memory. The result of this epistemological shift was not only a transformed, ‘historicist’ awareness of the world, now seen as the changeable product of historical processes as borne out by the documentary record, but also a relativised notion of the future, usually framed within the two opposing metanarratives of progress or decay. Such a notion of history begets a revised sense of awareness, whose consequences for music history I intend to spell out below, as well as the politically subversive quality of the new historicism when used as a revisionist tool by a politicised middle class. 3 See, for example., Walter Salmen, ed., Beiträge zur Geschichte der Musikanschauung im 19. Jahrhundert, Studien zur Musikgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts 1 (Regensburg: Bosse, 1965); Heinz Becker, ed., Beiträge zur Geschichte der Musikkritik, Studien zur Musikgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts 5 (Regensburg: Bosse, 1965); Carl Dahlhaus, ‘Historismus und Tradition,’ Zum 70. Geburtstag von Joseph Müller-Blattau, Saarbrücker Studien zur Musikwissenschaft 1, ed. Christoph-Hellmut Mahling (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1966) 46–58; Walter Wiora, ed., Die Ausbreitung des Historismus über die Musik, Studien zur Musikgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts 14 (Regensburg: Bosse, 1969); Carl Dahlhaus, ‘Traditionszerfall im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert,’ Studien zur Tradition in der Musik: Kurt von Fischer zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht and Max Lütolf (Munich: Katzbichler, 1973) 177–90; Carl Dahlhaus, Grundlagen der Musikgeschichte, Musik-Taschen-Bücher Theoretica 15 (Cologne: H. Gerig, 1977). For examples of the discussion among Anglo-Saxon and North American musicologists, see, for example, Joseph Kerman, ‘A Few Canonic Variations,’ Critical Inquiry 10 (1983): 107–26; Katherine Bergeron and Philip V. Bohlman, eds, Disciplining Music: Musicology and its Canons (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992); Lydia Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music (Oxford: Oxford UP 1992), Marcia J. Citron, Gender and the Musical Canon (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993), to name but a few. 4 See Carl Dahlhaus, Die Musik des 19. Jahrhunderts, Neues Handbuch der Musikwissenschaft 6 (Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlags-Gesellschaft Athenaion, 1980) 220. 5 For the following, see Thomas Nipperdey, Deutsche Geschichte 1800-1866: Bürgerwelt und starker Staat (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1983) 498–500. History as Identity Politics 97 Competing Views of (Music) History, up to ca. 1850 Turning now to the specific development of music historiography since the eighteenth century, three major epistemological stages may be distinguished.6 The first one may be called the ‘encyclopedic’ one: a brainchild of the Enlightenment, it perceives history as a sequence of events from Antiquity to the present which the historiographer attempts to record with the greatest possible accuracy and completeness. In order to do so, techniques of antiquarian scholarship are used (that is, source materials from the past are consulted and interpreted according to the prevailing epistemological system). The resulting data are then systematised and classified in a linear, progressive scheme. The present day and its music are seen as the best result yet of a continuous evolution towards ever greater perfection. A prime example of this approach is Charles Burney’s General History of Music (London, 1776-1789), which ends with the conclusion that no music really worth hearing was produced until the present day, that is, the late 1700s, and ‘that mankind was delighted with bad music before good was heard.’ A later Continental representative of this technique of knowledge production is Raphael Georg Kiesewetter’s Geschichte der europäisch-abendländischen oder unsrer heutigen Musik (Leipzig, 1834), which in turn perceived the period from 1800 to the 1830s— dubbed by Kiesewetter the ‘epoch of Beethoven and Rossini (1800-1832)’—as the crowning achievement of music history.7 A second stage of historical consciousness I refer to as the ‘Romantic view.’ Unlike encyclopedic accounts, which perceived music of the past as either ‘barbarous relics,’ or a precursor at best to the contemporaneous relative perfection of the art, the ‘Romantic’ view, in a fundamental reversal, elevated older music to the embodiment of artistic perfection, consequently re-interpreting the music of the present as a product
Recommended publications
  • 11. Heine and Shakespeare
    https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2021 Roger Paulin This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Roger Paulin, From Goethe to Gundolf: Essays on German Literature and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258 Copyright and permissions for the reuse of many of the images included in this publication differ from the above. Copyright and permissions information for images is provided separately in the List of Illustrations. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#copyright Further details about CC-BY licenses are available at, https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Updated digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. ISBN Paperback: 9781800642126 ISBN Hardback: 9781800642133 ISBN Digital (PDF): 9781800642140 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 9781800642157 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 9781800642164 ISBN Digital (XML): 9781800642171 DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0258 Cover photo and design by Andrew Corbett, CC-BY 4.0.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Objects of Veneration
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OBJECTS OF VENERATION: MUSIC AND MATERIALITY IN THE COMPOSER-CULTS OF GERMANY AND AUSTRIA, 1870-1930 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC BY ABIGAIL FINE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2017 © Copyright Abigail Fine 2017 All rights reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES.................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................. x ABSTRACT....................................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: Beethoven’s Death and the Physiognomy of Late Style Introduction..................................................................................................... 41 Part I: Material Reception Beethoven’s (Death) Mask............................................................................. 50 The Cult of the Face........................................................................................ 67 Part II: Musical Reception Musical Physiognomies...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Göttinger Sieben GESCHICHTE Erinnern an Die „Göttinger Sieben“ Zwei Denkmäler Erinnern in Nie­Der­Sach­Sen
    NEWSLETTER 1 Protestbrief an den König – die Göttinger Sieben GESCHICHTE Erinnern an die „Göttinger Sieben“ Zwei Denkmäler erinnern in Nie der sach sen noch heute an jene sieben Pro fes soren der www.klett.de Göttinger Georg-August-Uni versität, die un- ter dem Namen „Göttinger Sieben“ in die Ge schichte eingegangen sind. Während seit dem Jahr 1998 ein Fi gu ren en semble des Bildhauers Flo riano Bodi ni am nieder- sächsischen Landtag an die sieben Protes- tie ren den erinnert, mutet ein erst jüngst im Jahr 2011 von Günter Grass gestiftetes Denk- ­­mal für die sieben Professoren auf dem Göt- tinger Uni-Campus eher abstrakt an. Sowohl Bodini als auch Grass verstehen ihre Skulp- turen als Denk mäler für Mut und Zivil cou- rage. Bis heute werden die „Göttinger Sieben“ als aufrechte Vorkämpfer für bür gerliche Rech te und demokratische Freiheiten be- trachtet. Ihre Protest aktion gegen den König von Han nover im Jahr 1837 gilt als mutiges Signal im Kampf gegen die ab solutis tische Fürstenwillkür. Schon bei den Zeitgenossen erregte ihr Protest große Aufmerksamkeit. Und auch in späteren Jahren blieb ihre Po- pu­­larität nahezu ungebrochen. Sowohl die Wei marer Republik als auch die Bun des rep- ublik würdigten die Professoren als Vor- Berlin © AKG, bilder im Kampf um Mitbestim mung. Doch auch die National sozialis ten ins trumen- 1 Die „Göttinger Sieben“ talisierten die „Göt tin ger Sieben“ für sich. Zwar hatten die sieben Unterzeichner des Protestbriefs an den Diese unterschiedlichen Vereinnah mun- König sehr unterschiedliche Motive, doch die publizistische Öffent­ gen zeigen, dass es sich bei den „Göttinger lichkeit stellte die sieben Göttinger Professoren schon sehr früh als Sieben“ und ihrer Protest aktion um ein viel- Einheit dar.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Gundolf's Romanticism
    https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2021 Roger Paulin This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Roger Paulin, From Goethe to Gundolf: Essays on German Literature and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258 Copyright and permissions for the reuse of many of the images included in this publication differ from the above. Copyright and permissions information for images is provided separately in the List of Illustrations. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#copyright Further details about CC-BY licenses are available at, https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Updated digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. ISBN Paperback: 9781800642126 ISBN Hardback: 9781800642133 ISBN Digital (PDF): 9781800642140 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 9781800642157 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 9781800642164 ISBN Digital (XML): 9781800642171 DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0258 Cover photo and design by Andrew Corbett, CC-BY 4.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Werke Georg Friedrich Händels in Göttingen
    Die Werke Georg Friedrich Händels in Göttingen Eine Darstellung der Sammlung G. F. Händels in der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen unter Berücksichtigung des identischen Bestandes in weiteren ausgewählten Göttinger Institutionen T e x t von Poupak Amirazodi Göttingen, November 2005 I N H A L T S V E R Z E I C H N I S Seite Vorwort Einleitung 1 1 Allgemeines 1.1 Die Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen 4 1.1.1 Anfänge 5 1.1.2 Das 20. Jahrhundert 9 1.2 Die Musiksammlung 11 1.2.1 Umfang 12 1.2.2 Aufstellung – Signierung 15 2 Übersicht über die Kataloge der Universitätsbibliothek 17 2.1 Der Akzessionskatalog 18 2.2 Alphabetische Kataloge 21 2.3 Systematische und Sachkataloge 24 2.4 Sonderkataloge 26 2.5 Der Ars-Musica-Katalog 28 2.5.1 Der Ars Musica Catalogus realis 29 2.5.2 Der Ars Musica Catalogus alphabeticus 33 2.5.3 Besonderheiten der Katalogisierung im Göttinger Musikalienkatalog 36 3 Musikalien und Musikliteratur 38 3.1 Die Ära Notendrucke und musikalische Literatur 38 3.2 Musiksammlungen und Musikbibliotheken 40 3.3 Musik in der bibliothekarischen Praxis 43 4 Georg Friedrich Händel 45 4.1 Lebensgeschichte 46 4.2 Werke 49 5 Das Projekt G. F. Händel 50 5.1 Bericht über die Arbeit 51 5.2 Händel in der SUB Göttingen 55 5.2.1 Umfang des Händel-Bestandes 55 5.2.2 Aufbau und Erschließung 58 6 Musik und Händel in Göttingen 60 6.1 Musikwissenschaft und Musikpflege in Göttingen 61 6.2 Musikwissenschaftliche Institutionen 63 6.3 Das Musikwissenschaftliche Seminar der Universität Göttingen 64 6.3.1 Die Bibliothek 65 6.3.2 Der Händel-Bestand 67 6.4 Die Göttinger Händel-Gesellschaft 68 6.4.1 Entwicklung der Gesellschaft 69 6.4.2 Die Händel-Festspiele Göttingen 69 6.4.3 Bestandsaufbau und Erschließung 71 6.5 Das Stadtarchiv Göttingen 72 6.5.1 Geschichte des Stadtarchivs 72 6.5.2 Händel im Stadtarchiv 75 6.6 Die Werke Händels im Programm des Göttinger Symphonie Orchesters 75 7 Zusammenfassung 76 8 Literaturverzeichnis 8.1 Literatur 79 8.2 Internet-Veröffentlichungen 85 8.3 Unveröffentlichtes Material 87 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Online-Rezensionen Des Jahrbuchs Zur Liberalismus-Forschung 2/2014
    Online-Rezensionen des Jahrbuchs zur Liberalismus-Forschung 2/2014 Wilhelm Bleek/Bernhard Lauer (Hrsg): Protestation des Gewissens. Die Rechtfertigungsschriften der Göttinger Sieben. Kassel: Brüder Grimm-Gesellschaft, 2012, 208 S., ISBN: 978-3-940614-29-2 Bis zum Erscheinen dieses Buches stammte die letzte grundlegende „zitierwürdige“ Edition der Texte der „Göttinger Sieben“ aus dem Jahre 1934, die immerhin 1965 und 1987 jeweils nachgedruckt wurde. So ist es dankenswert, dass nun eine kritische Neuausgabe vorgelegt worden ist, die auch den aktuel- len Forschungsstand berücksichtigt. Mit Wilhelm Bleek „an Bord“ gelingt dieses. Er ist ein exzellenter Kenner der Epoche und hat über den schillerndsten der Göttinger Protestler von 1837, Friedrich Chris- toph Dahlmann, im Jahre 2010 eine umfangreiche und hoch gelobte Biografie vorgelegt. Die Göttinger Sieben stehen bis in unsere Zeit „pars pro toto“ für den Typus des unabhängigen und politisch enga- gierten Professors im deutschen Vormärz, wenn nicht sogar im 19. Jahrhundert, die auf der Suche nach einer „guten Verfassung“ waren. Ihr besonderes Verhältnis auch zur eigenen „Verfassungstreue“ stellten sie schon bei der Eingabe ihres Protestes am 18. November 1837 in den Mittelpunkt: Sie ver- wahrten sich nur gegen die einseitige Entbindung vom Verfassungseid durch den Monarchen, der da- mit seinen Willen über die Konstitution gestellt hatte – ein im Wortsinne willkürlicher Akt“ (S. 25). Die Brüder Grimm-Gesellschaft e.V. hat den Editionsband der Rechtfertigungsschriften der sieben Göt- tinger Professoren herausgegeben. Es sind die Schriften von Friedrich Christoph Dahlmann, Wilhelm Eduard Albrecht, Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm, Heinrich Ewald und Georg Gottfried Gervinus. Der sieben- te Göttinger, Wilhelm Weber, publizierte keine Protestschrift; und die von Gervinus übrigens erschien als Vorrede zum dritten Band seiner deutschen Literaturgeschichte.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierauf Eine Antwort Zu Versuchen, Sondern Vielmehr Die Position Dahlhaus’ Zu Der Gesamten Fragestellung Der Kritischen Ausgaben Zu Rekonstruieren
    Carl Dahlhaus: Werk, Wirkung, Aktualität – Staatliches Institut für Musikforschung Berlin, 10. – 13. Juni 2008 Programm [Dienstag, 10. Juni, 17.00 Uhr: Eröffnungsveranstaltung] Mittwoch, 11. Juni: 10.00 – 13.00 Uhr Ästhetik und Musikphilosophie Leitung: Peter Gülke, Berlin Gianmario Borio, Cremona: Über den sozialen Gehalt des musikalischen Werkes Simone Mahrenholz, Berlin: Die Bedeutung des (nicht) Notierten in der Musik Albrecht Wellmer, Berlin: Überlegungen zum Werkbegriff Christoph Hubig, Stuttgart: „Tragödie der Kultur“ revisited: Carl Dahlhaus’ Konzeption des Kunstwerks als Alternative zur Simmel-Cassirer-Kontroverse 14.00 – 15.30 Uhr Zur Edition Carl Dahlhaus: Gesammelte Schriften in 10 Bänden Leitung: Burkhard Meischein, Dresden Pietro Cavallotti, Bergamo: Dahlhaus und die Editionskritik Clemens Fanselau, Berlin: Beziehungsnetze – Über einen Aspekt des Nutzens von Schrifteneditionen Musikgelehrter Tobias Plebuch, Oldenburg: Zur Entwicklung des Schriftstellers Carl Dahlhaus 16.00 – 19.00 Uhr Kritik Leitung: Stephen Hinton, Palo Alto, CA Eleonore Büning, Berlin: Die Kunst der Pointe. Carl Dahlhaus als Musikkritiker Silke Leopold, Heidelberg: Carl Dahlhaus und das Regietheater – mit den Augen von heute gelesen Giselher Schubert, Frankfurt a. M.: Strawinsky und andere. Dahlhaus’ Einstellung zum Neoklassizismus Elisabeth Schwind, Konstanz: Vom Elend der Musikkritik. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit 1 Carl Dahlhaus: Werk, Wirkung, Aktualität – Staatliches Institut für Musikforschung Berlin, 10. – 13. Juni 2008 Donnerstag, 12. Juni: 10.00 –
    [Show full text]
  • History in the Service of Politics: a Reassessment of G. G. Gervinus
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository History Faculty Publications Scholarly Communication - Departments 1971 History in the Service of Politics: A Reassessment of G. G. Gervinus Charles E. McClelland University of New Mexico, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_fsp Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation McClelland, Charles E.. "History in the Service of Politics: A Reassessment of G. G. Gervinus." Central European History, 4 (1971), 371-89. (1971). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_fsp/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarly Communication - Departments at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. History in the Service of Politics: A Reassessment of G. G. Gervinus [Original draft of an article later appearing in CENTRAL EUROPEAN HISTORY, IV (1971), 371-89] The year 1971 marks the centenary of the death of Georg Gottfried Gervinus. This fact might seem to warrant attention only of antiquarians, since Gervinus appears in most textbooks (if at all) as a professor dismissed from the University of Göttingen for protesting the revocation of the Hanoverian constitution in 1837. But two facts about his reputation inspire greater attention. First, Gervinus was buried with unseemly haste by a host of unflattering necrologists, from Ranke on down, in the very year of the founding of the German Empire.1 Second, he has again achieved some attention recently as one of the few German democrats among the nineteenth-century professorate, thanks to publications in both East and West Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Christoph Dahlmann – Ein Politischer Professor Im 19
    Bonner Schriften zur Universitäts- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte Band 3 Herausgegeben von Thomas Becker, Dominik Geppert, Mathias Schmoeckel, Joachim Scholtyseck und Heinz Schott Thomas Becker / Wilhelm Bleek / Tilman Mayer (Hg.) Friedrich Christoph Dahlmann – ein politischer Professor im 19. Jahrhundert Mit 12 Abbildungen V&R unipress Bonn University Press Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. ISBN 978-3-89971-945-1 ISBN 978-3-86234-945-6 (E-Book) Veröffentlichungen der Bonn University Press erscheinen im Verlag V&R unipress GmbH 2012, V&R unipress in Göttingen / www.vr-unipress.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Printed in Germany. Titelbild: Dahlmann als Hampelmann. Kolorierte Lithographie, Lith. Anstalt von Eduard Gustav May in Frankfurt a. M. 1848 Druck und Bindung: CPI Buch Bücher.de GmbH, Birkach Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Inhalt Vorwort . ................................... 7 Jürgen Fohrmann Grußwort anlässlich des Gedenkbandes zum 150. Todestag von Friedrich Christoph Dahlmann . ................... 9 Svenja Schulze Grußwort: Zum »Wechselverhältnis von akademischer Gelehrsamkeit, sittlicher Überzeugung und politischem Engagement« .
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock
    https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2021 Roger Paulin This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Roger Paulin, From Goethe to Gundolf: Essays on German Literature and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258 Copyright and permissions for the reuse of many of the images included in this publication differ from the above. Copyright and permissions information for images is provided separately in the List of Illustrations. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#copyright Further details about CC-BY licenses are available at, https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Updated digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. ISBN Paperback: 9781800642126 ISBN Hardback: 9781800642133 ISBN Digital (PDF): 9781800642140 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 9781800642157 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 9781800642164 ISBN Digital (XML): 9781800642171 DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0258 Cover photo and design by Andrew Corbett, CC-BY 4.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the History of the Cadence Caleb Michael Mutch Submitted In
    Studies in the History of the Cadence Caleb Michael Mutch Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 1 © 2015 Caleb Michael Mutch All rights reserved 2 ABSTRACT Studies in the History of the Cadence Caleb Michael Mutch This dissertation traces the development of the concept of the cadence in the history of music theory. It proposes a division of the history of cadential theorizing into three periods, and elucidates these periods with four studies of particularly significant doctrines of musical closure. The first of these periods is the pre-history of the cadence, which lasted from the dawn of medieval music theory through the fifteenth century. During this time theorists such as John of Affligem (ca. 1100), whose writings are the subject of the first study, developed an analogy between music and the classical doctrine of punctuation to begin to describe how pieces and their constituent parts can conclude. The second period begins at the turn of the sixteenth century, with the innovative theory expounded by the authors of the Cologne school, which forms the subject of the second study. These authors identified the phenomenon of musical closure as an independent concept worthy of theoretical investigation, and established the first robustly polyphonic cadential doctrine to account for it. For the following three centuries theorists frequently made new contributions to the theorizing of the cadence in their writings, as exemplified by the remarkable taxonomy of cadences in the work of Johann Wolfgang Caspar Printz (1641-1717), the subject of the third study.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Nouveau and the Symphony During the Fin-De-Si¿¿¿¿ Cle: The
    Art Nouveau and the Symphony during the Fin-de-Siècle: The Intersection of the Arts in Paris and Vienna A Document Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS in the Division of Ensembles and Conducting of the College-Conservatory of Music By Christopher Hill M.M., University of Michigan, Orchestral Conducting (2005) B.M., Michigan State University, Double Bass Performance (2001) Advisor: Prof. Mark Gibson Reader: Dr. Jeongwon Joe Reader: Dr. Jonathan Kregor ii ABSTRACT This interdisciplinary document examines the intersection of art and music during the fin-de- siècle in Paris and Vienna, with particular emphasis on the convergence of Art Nouveau with the symphonic genre. It relates the more fluid Art Nouveau of Paris with the more geometric Jugendstil and Sezessionstil styles of Art Nouveau that emerged in Vienna, and explores the reciprocal influence of each in the development of the symphony during the fin-de-siècle. Four symphonic works that span the height of the Art Nouveau era are examined in detail, including the Symphony in B-flat major (1890) by Ernest Chausson (1855–1899), the Symphony No. 3 in B-flat major (1897) by Alexander von Zemlinsky (1871– 1942), the Symphony No. 2 in B-flat major (1902–3) by Vincent d’Indy (1851–1931), and the Symphony No. 7 (1904–5) by Gustav Mahler (1860–1911). Through an analysis of the shared Art Nouveau characteristics of each, a new lens for understanding and contextualizing these works is proposed.
    [Show full text]