Pdf Clickbook Booklet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pdf Clickbook Booklet Flora of Clark Valley Area # Fam Scientific Name (*)Common Name #Pls Ferns 1 Pte Cheilanthes parryi woolly lipfern 10 Eudicots 2 Aca Justicia californica chuparosa x 3 Ama Amaranthus blitoides *mat amaranth 20 4 Ama Amaranthus fimbriatus fringed amaranth V 5 Ama Tidestromia suffruticosa var. oblongifolia Arizona honeysweet 15 6 Apo Asclepias subulata rush milkweed 2 7 Apo Funastrum hirtellum rambling milkweed V 8 Apo Pilostyles thurberi Thurber's pilostyles 1 9 Ast Ambrosia dumosa burroweed 99 10 Ast Ambrosia salsola var. salsola cheesebush 5 11 Ast Baileya pauciradiata Colorado Desert marigold 79 12 Ast Bebbia juncea var. aspera sweetbush 4 13 Ast Calycoseris parryi yellow tackstem V 14 Ast Calycoseris wrightii white tackstem V 15 Ast Chaenactis carphoclinia var. carphoclinia pebble pincushion V 16 Ast Chaenactis fremontii Fremont pincushion 20 17 Ast Chaenactis stevioides desert pincushion 99 18 Ast Dicoria canescens desert dicoria 20 19 Ast Encelia farinosa brittlebush 20 20 Ast Encelia farinosa var. farinosa brittlebush iN 21 Ast Encelia farinosa var. phenicodonta purple disk flower brittlebush iN 22 Ast Encelia frutescens button encelia 2 23 Ast Geraea canescens hairy desert-sunflower 99 24 Ast Helianthus niveus ssp. tephrodes Algodones Dunes sunflower nr 25 Ast Helianthus petiolaris ssp. canescens gray desert sunflower V 26 Ast Isocoma acradenia var. acradenia entire-leaved alkali goldenbush V 27 Ast Isocoma acradenia var. eremophila toothed-leaved alkali goldenbush 99 28 Ast Lactuca serriola *prickly lettuce FC 29 Ast Lepidospartum squamatum scale-broom V 30 Ast Logfia arizonica Arizona herba impia iN 31 Ast Logfia depressa dwarf filago FC 32 Ast Malacothrix glabrata desert dandelion 30 33 Ast Monoptilon bellioides desert star x 34 Ast Palafoxia arida var. arida Spanish needle 40 35 Ast Pectis papposa var. papposa chinch-weed iN 36 Ast Perityle emoryi Emory's rock-daisy V 37 Ast Peucephyllum schottii pygmy-cedar x 38 Ast Pluchea sericea arrow-weed 99 39 Ast Psathyrotes ramosissima turtleback x 40 Ast Rafinesquia neomexicana desert chicory 99 41 Ast Senecio mohavensis Mojave ragwort iN 42 Ast Stephanomeria exigua ssp. exigua slender wreathplant V 43 Ast Stephanomeria pauciflora wire-lettuce 1 44 Ast Trichoptilium incisum yellow-head V 45 Ast Trixis californica var. californica California trixis 1 46 Ast Volutaria tubuliflora *Mediterranean desert knapweed iN 47 Ast Xylorhiza orcuttii Orcutt's woody-aster V 48 Big Chilopsis linearis ssp. arcuata desert-willow V 49 Bor Amsinckia intermedia common fiddleneck iN 50 Bor Amsinckia tessellata var. tessellata bristly fiddleneck V 51 Bor Cryptantha angustifolia narrow-leaved cryptantha 99 52 Bor Cryptantha barbigera var. barbigera bearded cryptantha 1 53 Bor Cryptantha barbigera var. fergusoniae Santa Rosa Mountain bearded cryptantha iN 54 Bor Cryptantha costata ribbed cryptantha V 55 Bor Cryptantha ganderi Gander's cryptantha x 56 Bor Cryptantha maritima Guadalupe cryptantha 5 57 Bor Cryptantha micrantha var. micrantha red-root cryptantha V 58 Bor Cryptantha nevadensis var. nevadensis Nevada cryptantha x 59 Bor Cryptantha pterocarya wing-nut cryptantha x 60 Bor Emmenanthe penduliflora var. penduliflora whispering bells iN 61 Bor Eucrypta micrantha desert eucrypta iN 62 Bor Heliotropium curassavicum var. oculatum seaside heliotrope x 63 Bor Nama demissa var. demissa purple mat iN 64 Bor Pectocarya heterocarpa chuckwalla pectocarya 10 65 Bor Pectocarya peninsularis Baja pectocarya V 66 Bor Pectocarya platycarpa broad-fruited combseed 1 67 Bor Pectocarya recurvata curvenut combseed V 68 Bor Phacelia crenulata var. ambigua heliotrope phacelia 20 69 Bor Phacelia crenulata var. minutiflora little-flowered heliotrope phacelia 20 70 Bor Phacelia distans common phacelia 10 71 Bor Phacelia ivesiana Ives' phacelia iN 72 Bor Phacelia neglecta alkali phacelia iN 73 Bor Plagiobothrys jonesii Jones' popcorn flower iN 74 Bor Tiquilia palmeri Palmer's coldenia 1 75 Bor Tiquilia plicata plicate coldenia V 76 Bra Brassica tournefortii *Sahara mustard 99 77 Bra Caulanthus lasiophyllus California mustard iN 78 Bra Descurainia pinnata western tansy-mustard FC 79 Bra Dithyrea californica spectacle-pod 1 80 Bra Draba cuneifolia wedge-leaved draba iN 81 Bra Lepidium lasiocarpum ssp. lasiocarpum hairy-podded pepper-grass 99 82 Bra Sisymbrium irio *London rocket 5 83 Bra Streptanthella longirostris longbeak streptanthella 5 84 Bra Tropidocarpum gracile slender tropidocarpum iN 85 Bur Bursera microphylla elephant tree 13 86 Cac Cylindropuntia bigelovii teddy-bear cholla x 87 Cac Cylindropuntia echinocarpa silver cholla 22 88 Cac Cylindropuntia ganderi Gander's cholla 15 89 Cac Cylindropuntia ramosissima pencil cholla 20 90 Cac Echinocereus engelmannii Engelmann's hedgehog cactus 1 91 Cac Ferocactus cylindraceus California barrel cactus 8 92 Cac Mammillaria dioica California fish-hook cactus 1 93 Cac Opuntia basilaris var. basilaris beavertail cactus 1 94 Cam Nemacladus glanduliferus glandular nemacladus iN 95 Cam Nemacladus orientalis eastern glandular nemacladus iN 96 Car Achyronychia cooperi frost mat V 97 Che Allenrolfea occidentalis iodine-bush 99 98 Che Atriplex canescens var. laciniata Caleb four-wing saltbush 99 99 Che Atriplex elegans var. fasciculata wheelscale 10 100 Che Atriplex hymenelytra desert holly 3 101 Che Atriplex lentiformis ssp. lentiformis big saltbush 65 102 Che Atriplex polycarpa cattle saltbush 99 103 Che Monolepis nuttalliana Nuttall's poverty weed 99 104 Che Salsola paulsenii *Paulsen's Russian thistle 99 105 Che Suaeda nigra bush seepweed 99 106 Cle Cleomella obtusifolia Mojave cleomella iN 107 Cle Peritoma arborea bladderpod V 108 Cle Wislizenia refracta ssp. palmeri Palmer's jackass clover V 109 Con Cuscuta californica var. papillosa papillate dodder 3 110 Cra Crassula connata pygmy-weed FC 111 Cro Crossosoma bigelovii rock crossosoma V 112 Eup Chamaesyce micromera Sonoran spurge 1 113 Eup Chamaesyce polycarpa small-seeded spurge 80 114 Eup Chamaesyce setiloba starfish (Yuma) spurge V 115 Eup Croton californicus California croton 3 116 Eup Ditaxis lanceolata narrowleaf ditaxis x 117 Eup Ditaxis neomexicana New Mexico ditaxis V 118 Eup Stillingia spinulosa annual stillingia 20 119 Fab Acmispon strigosus strigose lotus 1 120 Fab Astragalus crotalariae Salton milk-vetch 99 121 Fab Astragalus didymocarpus var. dispermus dwarf white milk-vetch V 122 Fab Astragalus lentiginosus var. borreganus Borrego milk-vetch 99 123 Fab Dalea mollis silky dalea V 124 Fab Dalea mollissima downy dalea x 125 Fab Lupinus arizonicus Arizona lupine 23 168 Pol Eriastrum harwoodii Harwood's woolly-star iN 126 Fab Lupinus shockleyi desert lupine iN 169 Pol Gilia stellata star gilia iN 127 Fab Parkinsonia florida blue palo verde iN 170 Pol Langloisia setosissima ssp. setosissima bristly langloisia iN 128 Fab Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana honey mesquite 99 171 Pol Linanthus jonesii Jones' linanthus iN 129 Fab Psorothamnus emoryi Emory's indigo-bush 15 172 Pol Loeseliastrum matthewsii desert calico V 130 Fab Psorothamnus schottii indigo bush 50 173 Pol Loeseliastrum schottii Schott's calico 99 131 Fab Psorothamnus spinosus smoke tree 1 174 Pol Chorizanthe brevicornu var. brevicornu brittle spineflower 3 132 Fab Senegalia greggii catclaw 20 175 Pol Chorizanthe corrugata wrinkled spineflower x 133 Fou Fouquieria splendens ssp. splendens ocotillo 8 176 Pol Chorizanthe rigida devil's spineflower iN 134 Ger Erodium cicutarium *redstem filaree 10 177 Pol Eriogonum inflatum desert trumpet x 135 Ger Erodium texanum Texas filaree x 178 Pol Eriogonum thomasii Thomas' buckwheat x 136 Kra Krameria bicolor white rhatany 40 179 Pol Eriogonum trichopes little desert trumpet 20 137 Lam Hyptis emoryi desert-lavender 10 180 Pol Pterostegia drymarioides fairy bowties, threadstem iN 138 Lam Salvia columbariae chia 5 181 Res Oligomeris linifolia lineleaf whitepuff 99 139 Lam Salvia vaseyi Vasey's sage 10 182 Sim Simmondsia chinensis jojoba 20 140 Loa Mentzelia affinis yellow blazing star 20 183 Sol Lycium brevipes var. brevipes desert boxthorn 99 141 Loa Mentzelia desertorum desert blazing star V 184 Sol Nicotiana clevelandii Cleveland's tobacco V 142 Loa Mentzelia involucrata bracted blazing star 3 185 Tam Tamarix aphylla *athel 5 143 Loa Petalonyx thurberi ssp. thurberi Thurber's sandpaper-plant 10 186 Tam Tamarix ramosissima *saltcedar 5 144 Mal Eremalche exilis white mallow 1 187 Vis Phoradendron californicum desert mistletoe 99 145 Mal Eremalche rotundifolia desert five-spot V 188 Zyg Fagonia laevis California fagonia x 146 Mal Hibiscus denudatus rock hibiscus x 189 Zyg Fagonia pachyacantha sticky fagonia x 147 Mal Malva parviflora *cheeseweed iN 190 Zyg Kallstroemia californica California caltrop iN 148 Mal Sphaeralcea angustifolia copper globemallow 99 191 Zyg Larrea tridentata creosote bush 99 149 Mon Calyptridium monandrum sand cress iN Monocots 150 Mon Cistanthe ambigua dead man's fingers 99 192 Aga Hesperocallis undulata desert lily 50 151 Nyc Abronia villosa var. villosa hairy sand-verbena 50 193 Poa Aristida adscensionis six-weeks three-awn V 152 Nyc Allionia incarnata var. incarnata small-flowered trailing four o'clock iN 194 Poa Hilaria rigida big galleta 80 153 Nyc Boerhavia triquetra var. intermedia fivewing spiderling iN 195 Poa Phalaris minor *little-seed canarygrass iN 154 Nyc Mirabilis laevis var. retrorsa Bigelow's desert four-o'clock iN 196 Poa Schismus barbatus *Mediterranean schismus 99 155 Ona Camissoniopsis pallida ssp. pallida pale suncup iN 197 Poa Stipa hymenoides Indian ricegrass iN
Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site
    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2018), 43(1): pp. 53–76 © Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364418X696978 Date of publication April 18, 2018 Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae) Makenzie E. Mabry1,2 and Michael G. Simpson1 1Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U. S. A. 2Current address: Division of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, U. S. A. Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract—Cryptantha, an herbaceous plant genus of the Boraginaceae, subtribe Amsinckiinae, has an American amphitropical disjunct distri- bution, found in western North America and western South America, but not in the intervening tropics. In a previous study, Cryptantha was found to be polyphyletic and was split into five genera, including a weakly supported, potentially non-monophyletic Cryptantha s. s. In this and subsequent studies of the Amsinckiinae, interrelationships within Cryptantha were generally not strongly supported and sample size was generally low. Here we analyze a greatly increased sampling of Cryptantha taxa using high-throughput, genome skimming data, in which we obtained the complete ribosomal cistron, the nearly complete chloroplast genome, and twenty-three mitochondrial genes. Our analyses have allowed for inference of clades within this complex with strong support. The occurrence of a non-monophyletic Cryptantha is confirmed, with three major clades obtained, termed here the Johnstonella/Albidae clade, the Maritimae clade, and a large Cryptantha core clade, each strongly supported as monophyletic. From these phylogenomic analyses, we assess the classification, character evolution, and phylogeographic history that elucidates the current amphitropical distribution of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 07-Afc-5
    DOCKET 07-AFC-5 DATE SEP 24 2008 RECD. SEP 24 2008 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) (07-AFC-5) Supplemental Data Response, Set 1D (Responses to: Biological Resources) Submitted to the California Energy Commission Submitted by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC September 24, 2008 With Assistance from 2485 Natomas Park Drive Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Introduction Attached are supplemental responses (Set 1D) by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC (Applicant) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) Staff’s data requests for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) Project (07-AFC-5). These data requests are the result of the workshop discussion held at Primm, Nevada on June 23, 2008.Within each discipline area, the responses are presented in alphabetical order and are numbered for tracking and reference convenience. New graphics or tables are numbered in reference to the Supplemental Data Request number. For example, if a table were used in response to Data Request AQ-1, it would be numbered Table AQ1-1. The first figure used in response to Data Request AQ-1 would be Figure AQ1-1, and so on. AFC figures or tables that have been revised have “R1” following the original number, indicating revision 1. Additional tables, figures, or documents submitted in response to a supplemental data request (supporting data, stand-alone documents such as plans, folding graphics, etc.) are found at the end of a discipline-specific section and may not be sequentially page-numbered consistently with the remainder of the document, though they may have their own internal page numbering system.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Key to the Saskatchewan Cryptantha Sarah Vinge-Mazer (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre) on Behalf of the Botanical Assessment Working Group
    Taxonomic Key to the Saskatchewan Cryptantha Sarah Vinge-Mazer (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre) on behalf of the Botanical Assessment Working Group Introduction The Botanical Assessment Working Group has been working on placing Saskatchewan’s two perennial Cryptantha species since around 2011, following many questions and confusion from the local botanical community. The use of the name Cryptantha macounii was the source of much of the confusion, for which an explanation is now provided. The name Cryptantha macounii (=Oreocarya macounii) is a true synonym for Cryptantha celosioides (see Simpson). In Saskatchewan (and apparently Montana, see Lesica 2012) this name has instead been applied to Cryptantha spiculifera material. Furthering the confusion, the name Cryptantha nubigena has been applied to both C. spiculifera and C. celosioides in Saskatchewan and appears regularly in older taxonomic keys. The name C. macounii has to be maintained for C. spiculifera material in Sask. for now until the SKCDC can update its database with the name. C. spiculifera has been included as a synonym for C. macounii in the SKCDC vascular plant species list. This key was compiled from several sources and was written to clarify the placement of the Saskatchewan Cryptantha species and serve as interim information until the Flora of North America (FNA) on Boraginaceae is published. It is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Notes • Our two perennial species are retained in Cryptantha in this key but are expected to be moved under the genus Oreocarya in the FNA treatment (see Simpson) • The Manual of Montana Vascular Plants (Lesica 2012) provides species descriptions for all species that occur in Sask.
    [Show full text]
  • Boraginaceae), with an Emphasis on the Popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys)
    Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) By Christopher Matthew Guilliams A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Professor David Ackerly Professor Brent Mishler Professor Patrick O'Grady Summer 2015 Abstract Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) by Christopher Matthew Guilliams Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Amsinckiinae is a diverse and ecologically important subtribe of annual herbaceous or perennial suffrutescent taxa with centers of distribution in western North America and southern South America. Taxa in the subtribe occur in all major ecosystems in California and more broadly in western North America, from the deserts of Baja California in the south where Johnstonella and Pectocarya are common, north to the ephemeral wetland ecosystems of the California Floristic Province where a majority of Plagiobothrys sect. Allocarya taxa occur, and east to the Basin and Range Province of western North America, where Cryptantha sensu stricto (s.s.) and Oreocarya are well represented. The subtribe minimally includes 9 genera: Amsinckia, Cryptantha s.s., Eremocarya, Greeneocharis, Harpagonella, Johnstonella, Oreocarya, Pectocarya, and Plagiobothrys; overall minimum-rank taxonomic diversity in the subtribe is ca. 330-342 taxa, with ca. 245--257 taxa occurring in North America, 86 in South America, and 4 in Australia. Despite their prevalence on the landscape and a history of active botanical research for well over a century, considerable research needs remain in Amsinckiinae, especially in one of the two largest genera, Plagiobothrys.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California
    Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California Volume 1 of 2 – Introduction, Methods, and Results Prepared by: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program California Native Plant Society Vegetation Program For: The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District The Sonoma County Water Agency Authors: Anne Klein, Todd Keeler-Wolf, and Julie Evens December 2015 ABSTRACT This report describes 118 alliances and 212 associations that are found in Sonoma County, California, comprising the most comprehensive local vegetation classification to date. The vegetation types were defined using a standardized classification approach consistent with the Survey of California Vegetation (SCV) and the United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) system. This floristic classification is the basis for an integrated, countywide vegetation map that the Sonoma County Vegetation Mapping and Lidar Program expects to complete in 2017. Ecologists with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Native Plant Society analyzed species data from 1149 field surveys collected in Sonoma County between 2001 and 2014. The data include 851 surveys collected in 2013 and 2014 through funding provided specifically for this classification effort. An additional 283 surveys that were conducted in adjacent counties are included in the analysis to provide a broader, regional understanding. A total of 34 tree-overstory, 28 shrubland, and 56 herbaceous alliances are described, with 69 tree-overstory, 51 shrubland, and 92 herbaceous associations. This report is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 (this volume) is composed of the project introduction, methods, and results. It includes a floristic key to all vegetation types, a table showing the full local classification nested within the USNVC hierarchy, and a crosswalk showing the relationship between this and other classification systems.
    [Show full text]