DOCSLIB.ORG

IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2 APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G). See Figures 1 and 2 for survey areas. Athos Supplemental 2019 Botanical Survey Memo Report Survey Preparation Botanist Michelle Cloud-Hughes, along with Dave Kesonie and Emily Thorn, visited reference populations on January 29, 2019 at two locations: Highway 62 and Ironage Road and the Desert Lily Sanctuary, near Hwy 177, just north of Desert Center. Eriastrum harwoodii (CRPR 1B and BLM Sensitive; was identified at both localities. Individuals of Astragalus species and Cryptantha species were observed but needed an additional 2-3 weeks to distinguish whether they were indeed the special-status species Astragalus insularis var. harwoodii (CRPR 2B.2, no BLM status) and Cryptantha costata (CRPR 4.3, no BLM status). Ditaxis serrata var. californica (CRPR 3.2, no BLM status) has been reported to occur within the area but was not located even after contacting the botanist who originally collected from that local population. Please refer to the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood, 2019) for additional details. The results of the 2018 botanical inventories and sensitive species previously observed on the project site were reviewed prior to beginning surveys. Survey Method Botanical surveys began on March 4, 2019 and concluded on March 9, 2019. Field surveys were conducted according to the methods described in the BRTR (Ironwood, 2019). Along the gen-tie line and access roads, botanists walked along parallel linear belt transects spaced at 10-meter intervals within the first 30 meters on each side of the centerline, and covered an additional 50-meter buffer at 20-meter intervals on each side. A total width of 80 meters on each side of the gen-tie centerline was covered resulting in a 160-meter wide survey corridor. Gen-tie segments 3 and 4 have additional spur roads 1 and 2, resulting in a wider 60 meters of coverage on each side of the centerline at 10-meter intervals with an additional 50-meter buffer at 20-meter intervals on each side of the gen-tie. These survey areas have a survey corridor of 220-meters. Native parcels (D, F, and G) were surveyed at 10-meter intervals (Figure 2). An inventory of all plant species observed was recorded. Any California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) plants were noted and their locations were recorded. Locations of any cacti (excluding cholla species, genus Cylindropuntia) on BLM lands were also recorded. The field team also searched for creosote bush rings on BLM lands. All locational information for special status species observed were recorded using a Global Positioning System (GPS). In addition to recording sign with the GPS unit, standardized paper datasheets were also completed. Surveyors included: Michelle Cloud-Hughes, Marc Baker, Dave Kesonie, Emily Thorn, and Lehong Chow. Page | 2 Athos Supplemental 2019 Botanical Survey Memo Report RESULTS Sensitive Species One special-status plant species not previously reported was detected during spring 2019 botanical surveys: Astragalus insularis var. harwoodii (CRPR 2B.2). Individuals of this plant were observed on gen- tie segment 2A and parcel group G (see Figure 3). No additional occurrences of special-status species reported previously were observed during the Spring 2019 survey. Locations of all special-status species detected on the Project site, including 2018 and 2019 field surveys, are shown in Figure 3. Cacti Counts Two species of cacti (excluding Cylindropuntia species) were observed during spring 2019 botanical surveys. Table 1 lists the cacti observations. Table 1. Cacti Count Results Cactus Species Location # Individuals Fishook cactus (Mammalaria tetrancistra) gen-tie 3 1 Barrel cactus (Ferocactus parcel group cylindraceus) F 2 Creosote Rings No creosote rings were observed. Plant list Several plant species were observed during the 2019 botanical surveys that were not previously detected due to poor germination. The full list of all plants observed since 2018 is included in Table 2 below. Table 2. Athos 2018-2019 Plants Observed SOLAR SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME GENUS GEN-TIE FARM Abronia villosa sand verbena Nyctaginaceae X Abronia villosa var villosa hairy sand verbena Nyctaginaceae X X Achyronychia cooperi onyx flower Caryophyllaceae X X Acmispon strigosus strigose lotus Fabaceae X X Aliciella latifolia broad leaf gilia Polemoniaceae X X Allionia incarnata windmills Nyctaginaceae X Page | 3 Athos Supplemental 2019 Botanical Survey Memo Report SOLAR SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME GENUS GEN-TIE FARM Ambrosia acanthicarpa annual burweed Asteraceae X Ambrosia dumosa white bursage Asteraceae X X Ambrosia ilicifolia holly leaf bursage Asteraceae X Ambrosia salsola cheesebush Asteraceae X X Amaranthus fimbriatus fringed amaranth Amaranthaceae X Amsinckia tessellata devil's lettuce Boraginaceae X X Antirrhinum filipes tangled snapdragon Plantaginaceae X Aristida sp. three-awn Poaceae X Aristida adscensionis three-awn Poaceae X *Antennaria sp. pussy toes Asteraceae X Asclepias erosa desert milkweed Apocynaceae X X Asclepias subulata skeleton milkweed Apocynaceae X Astragalus insularis var. Harwood's milkvetch Fabaceae X X harwoodii dwarf white Astragalus didymocarpus Fabaceae X milkvetch Astragalus lentiginosus freckled milkvetch Fabaceae X X var. variabilis Atriplex canescens hoary saltbush Chenopodiaceae X X Atriplex polycarpa allscale saltbush Chenopodiaceae X X Atrichoceris platyphylla gravel ghost Asteraceae X X Baileya pauciradiata laxflower Asteraceae X X Baileya pleniradiata wooly marigold Asteraceae X Baileya sp. desert marigold Asteraceae X Bebbia juncea sweetbush Asteraceae X Bebbia juncea var. aspera rush sweetbush Asteraceae X Boerhavia sp. slender spiderling Nyctaginaceae X Bouteloua sp. six-weeks gramma Poaceae X Bouteloua aristidoides var. needle grama Poaceae X X aristidoides Brandegea bigelovii desert starvine Cucurbitaceae X *Brassica tournefortii Sahara mustard Brassicaceae X X Calycoseris wrightii white tackstem Asteraceae X X Camissonia campestris Mojave suncup Onagraceae X *Carpobotus edulis highway ice plant Aizoaceae X Castela emoryi crucifixion thorn Simaroubaceae X Caulanthus lasiophyllus California mustard Brassicaceae X X Chaenactis carphoclinia pebble pincushion Asteraceae X X Chaenactis fremontii Fremont's pincushion Asteraceae X X Page | 4 Athos Supplemental 2019 Botanical Survey Memo Report SOLAR SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME GENUS GEN-TIE FARM Chaenactis stevioides desert pincushion Asteraceae X X Chaenactis xantiana fleshcolor pincushion Asteraceae X Chaenactis sp. pincushion Asteraceae X X *Chenopodium murale nettle leaf goosefoot Chenopodiaceae X X Condea emoryi desert lavender Lamiaceae X X Chorizanthe brevicornu brittle spineflower Polygonaceae X X Chorizanthe rigida spiny herb Polygonaceae X Chorizanthe corrugata wrinkled spineflower Polygonaceae X Chylismia brevipes ssp. golden suncup Onagraceae X X brevipes Chylismia claviformis browneyes Onagraceae X Croton californicus California croton Euphorbaceae X narrow leaved Cryptantha angustifolia Boraginaceae X X cryptantha bush-loving Cryptantha dumetorum Boraginaceae X cryptantha Guadalupe Cryptantha maritima Boraginaceae X cryptantha Cryptantha micrantha redroot cryptantha Boraginaceae X Nevada forget me Cryptantha nevadensis Boraginaceae X X not winged nut forget me Cryptantha pterocarya Boraginaceae X not Cryptantha sp. cryptantha Boraginaceae X Cucurbita palmata coyote melon Cucurbitaceae X Cylindropuntia silver cholla Cactaceae X X echinocarpa Cylindropuntia pencil cholla Cactaceae X X ramosissima Dalea mollis hairy prairie clover Fabaceae X X Dalea mollissima silky dalea Fabaceae X X Datura discolor small datura Solanaceae X X Datura wrightii jimson weed Solanaceae X X western tansy Descurainia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Relationships Affecting Endangered Species Recognized by O'odham and Comcaac Cultures
    Interspecific Relationships Affecting Endangered Species Recognized by O'Odham and Comcáac Cultures Author(s): Gary Paul Nabhan Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 10, No. 5 (Oct., 2000), pp. 1288-1295 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2641284 Accessed: 03/11/2010 16:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=esa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications. http://www.jstor.org 1288 INVITED FEATURE Ecological Applications Vol. 10, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project
    Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project June 8, 2016 Prepared for: Nichols Road Partners, LLC P.O. Box 77850 Corona, CA 92877 Prepared by: Alden Environmental, Inc. 3245 University Avenue, #1188 San Diego, CA 92104 Nichols Road Mine Project Biological Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description ..............................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS & SURVEY LIMITATIONS .................................................................1 2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................1 2.2 Biological Surveys ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................3 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineations of Waters of U.S. and Waters of the State ....4 2.2.3 Sensitive Species Surveys .........................................................................4 2.2.4 Survey Limitations ....................................................................................5 2.2.5 Nomenclature ............................................................................................5 3.0 REGULATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument
    Schmidt, Drost, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2006-1163 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2006-1163 November 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Charles A. Drost, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2006-1163 November, 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C. A., C. A. Drost, and W. L. Halvorson 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument. USGS Open-File Report 2006-1163.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site
    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • M/Izeeuican%Usdllm
    M/izEeuican%Usdllm PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2 2 II MARCH I 7, I 965 Descriptions of Three New Species of the Bee Genus Calliopsis (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) BY ALVIN F. SHINN1 The species below are described at the present time to make their names available for use in connection with biological studies recently completed on them. The species are closely related and belong in a group with Calliopsis coloradensis Cresson, C. chlorops Cockerell, and C. coloratipes Cockerell. Evidence for interspecific mating in the group is given. The presence of all three new species, as well as others in their group, at the Southwestern Research Station of the American Museum of Natural History offers an unparalleled opportunity for the study of ecological differentiation in these closely related Calliopsis bees. I wish to thank the following collectors and museum curators who have lent so generously of their own specimens or of specimens in their care which have been used in this study: Dr. G. E. Bohart, United States Department of Agriculture, Wild Bee Pollination Investigations, Utah State University, Logan; Drs. G. D. Butler, Jr., and F. G. Werner, University of Arizona, Tucson; Dr. P. D. Hurd, Jr., California Insect Survey, University of California, Berkeley; Dr. W. E. LaBerge, Uni- versity of Nebraska, Lincoln; Dr. C. D. Michener, the University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dr. E. S. Ross, the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco; Dr. J. G. Rozen, Jr., the American Museum of Natural History, New York City; Mr.
    [Show full text]