DOCSLIB.ORG

Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 16, 2008 Project No. 080470 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION- EXHIBIT E Table of Contents 1 General Description 1-1 1.1 Project Description 1-1 1.2 Project Area 1-2 1.2.1 Existing Land Use 1-4 1.3 Compatibility with Landfill Project 1-5 1.3.1 Land Exchange 1-5 1.3.2 Landfill Operations 1-6 1.3.3 Landfill Permitting 1-6 1.3.4 Compatibility of Specific Features 1-7 1.3.4.1 Potential Seepage Issues 1-8 1.3.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Interferences 1-9 2 Water Use and Quality 2-1 2.1 Surface Waters 2-1 2.1.1 Instream Flow Uses of Streams 2-1 2.1.2 Water quality of surface water 2-1 2.1.3 Existing lakes and reservoirs 2-1 2.1.4 Impacts of Construction and Operation 2-1 2.1.5 Measures recommended by Federal and state agencies to protect surface water 2-1 2.2 Description of Existing Groundwater 2-1 2.2.1 Springs and Wells 2-3 2.2.2 Water Bearing Formations 2-3 2.2.3 Hydraulic Characteristics 2-4 2.2.4 Groundwater Levels 2-5 2.2.5 Groundwater Flow Direction 2-6 2.2.6 Groundwater Storage 2-7 2.2.7 Groundwater Pumping 2-7 2.2.8 Recharge Sources 2-8 2.2.9 Outflow 2-9 2.2.10 Perennial Yield 2-9 2.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater Supply 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Project Water Supply 2-9 2.3.2 Perennial Yield 2-10 2.3.3 Regional Groundwater Level Effects 2-12 2.3.4 Local Groundwater Level Effects 2-15 2.3.5 Groundwater Flow Direct Effects 2-15 2.3.6 Subsidence Potential 2-15 2.3.7 Hydrocompaction Potential 2-16 2.3.8 Cumulative Projected Effects to Water Supply 2-16 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy i DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION – EXHIBIT E 2.4 Groundwater Quality 2-19 2.4.1 Description of Environment 2-19 2.4.1.1 Groundwater 2-19 2.4.1.2 Surface Water Resources 2-23 2.4.2 Potential Impacts to Water Quality 2-24 2.4.2.1 Groundwater Quality Effects 2-24 2.4.2.2 Surface Water Quality Effects 2-25 2.4.3 Existing or Proposed Protection, Mitigation, or Enhancement Activities 2-30 2.5 Summary Potential Groundwater Impacts 2-30 2.6 Groundwater Mitigation Measures 2-31 2.6.1 Higher Groundwater Levels 2-32 2.6.2 Lower Groundwater Levels 2-32 2.6.3 Subsidence 2-33 2.6.4 Loss of Facilities 2-33 2.7 Groundwater Mitigation Monitoring 2-33 2.8 Monitoring Network 2-33 2.8.1 Water Production 2-33 2.8.2 Water Levels and Quality 2-34 2.8.3 Subsidence 2-34 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Botanical Resources 3-1 3.1 Fish and Aquatic Resources 3-1 3.2 Description of Existing Plant and Wildlife Communities 3-2 3.2.1 Plant Communities 3-2 3.2.2 Wildlife Communities 3-4 3.2.3 Recent Biological Surveys in the Project Area 3-4 3.3 Special-Status Species and Biological Resources 3-5 3.3.1 Listed Species in the Project Area 3-6 3.3.2 Non-Listed Special-Status Species 3-16 3.4 Special Habitats 3-16 3.4.1 Wetlands, Seeps and Springs, and Jurisdictional Waters 3-16 3.4.2 Artificial Water Impoundments 3-17 3.4.3 Other Special-Status Habitats in the Project Area 3-22 3.4.3.1 Desert Dry Wash Woodland 3-22 3.4.3.2 Sand Dunes 3-22 3.4.4 Other Biological Considerations in the Project Area 3-22 3.4.4.1 Biological Soil Crusts 3-22 3.4.4.2 Invasive Species 3-23 3.5 Potential Impacts to Biological Resources 3-23 3.5.1 General Potential Impacts to Biological Resources 3-23 3.5.2 Construction 3-24 3.5.3 Operation and Maintenance 3-25 3.5.4 Specific Potential Impacts to Biological Resources 3-26 3.5.2.1 Terrestrial Plants and Animals 3-26 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy ii DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION – EXHIBIT E 3.5.4.1 Birds and Bats 3-26 3.5.4.2 Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Species 3-27 3.5.4.3 Wetlands and Jurisdictional Waters 3-27 3.6 Recommended Mitigation Measures 3-27 3.6.1 General Mitigation Measures 3-27 3.6.2 Species-Specific Mitigation Measures 3-29 3.6.2.1 Special-Status Plants 3-29 3.6.2.2 Special-Status Animals 3-30 3.6.2.3 Special-status Species 3-30 3.6.2.4 Special-status Natural Communities 3-35 4 Historic and Archaeological Resources 4-1 4.1 Discovery Measures Recommended by State and Federal Agencies 4-1 4.1.1 Statement of applicants position on these recommendations 4-1 4.2 Results of inventories 4-1 4.2.1 Methods 4-1 4.2.2 Previous Reports 4-2 4.2.3 Explanation of variations from survey procedures recommended 4-7 4.3 Historic and archeological sites in the Project Area 4-7 4.3.1 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources 4-7 4.3.2 Prehistoric Cultural Resources 4-13 4.3.3 Historic Cultural Resources 4-16 4.4 Direct or Indirect Impacts of Project 4-18 4.5 Management Plan 4-19 4.5.1 Schedule and Cost for Implementing Mitigation 4-20 4.5.2 Sources and Extent of Financing 4-20 5 Socio-Economic Impacts 5-1 5.1 Description of the Study Area 5-1 5.2 Identification of the Area Potentially Impacted by the Project 5-2 5.3 Description of Study Area Demographics 5-2 5.3.1 Population Size and Growth Trends 5-2 5.3.2 Urban and Rural Distribution 5-4 5.3.3 Distribution of Residents by Age and Sex 5-5 5.3.4 Distribution of Residents by Race 5-7 5.3.5 Education 5-7 5.3.6 Citizenship and Birthplace 5-7 5.3.7 Language Spoken 5-7 5.3.8 Housing Characteristics 5-8 5.3.9 Housing Costs 5-8 5.3.10 Household Income 5-8 5.3.11 Commuting to Work 5-8 5.4 Summary of Study Area Employment and Income 5-9 5.4.1 Employment 5-9 5.4.2 Wages and Income 5-10 5.4.3 County Sales Tax 5-12 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy iii DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION – EXHIBIT E 5.5 Description of Study Area Activity 5-12 5.5.1 Agricultural Sector 5-12 5.5.2 Mining Sector 5-12 5.5.3 Construction Sector 5-13 5.5.4 Manufacturing Sector 5-13 5.5.5 Trade, Transportation and Public Utilities Sector 5-13 5.5.6 Service Sector 5-13 5.5.7 Government Sector 5-13 5.6 Description of Study Area Infrastructure 5-14 5.6.1 Accommodations 5-14 5.6.1.1 Housing 5-14 5.6.1.2 Temporary Accommodations 5-14 5.6.1.3 Community and Social Services 5-15 5.6.1.4 Municipal Services 5-15 5.6.1.5 Emergency Services 5-16 5.6.1.6 Transportation Systems 5-16 5.7 Project Impacts During Construction 5-17 5.7.1 Onsite Employment and Labor Income 5-17 5.7.2 Impacts on Community Infrastructure 5-22 5.7.3 Impacts on Adjacent Properties 5-23 5.7.4 Impacts on Local Government Finances 5-23 5.7.4.1 Costs 5-23 5.7.4.2 Revenues 5-23 5.7.5 Indirect and Induced Impacts of Project Construction 5-24 5.8 Impacts During Operating Phase 5-24 5.8.1 Direct Employment and Labor Income 5-24 5.8.2 Purchases of Materials 5-25 5.8.3 Impacts on Local Government Finances 5-25 5.8.4 Indirect and Induced Impacts on Ongoing Expenditures 5-25 5.9 Displacement of Residences and Business Establishments 5-25 6 Geological and Soil Resources 6-1 6.1 Description of geological features 6-1 6.1.1 General Geologic Setting 6-1 6.1.2 Project Area Geology 6-2 6.1.2.1 Formational Rock Stratigraphy 6-2 6.1.2.2 Surficial Deposits 6-4 6.1.2.3 Geologic Structures 6-6 6.1.2.4 Mineral Resources 6-7 6.2 Description of soils 6-8 6.2.1 Soil Resources 6-8 6.2.1.1 Proposed Generating Facility Area 6-8 6.2.1.2 Water Supply Corridor 6-9 6.2.1.3 Transmission Line Corridor 6-10 6.3 Description of existing and potential geological and soil hazards 6-10 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy iv DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION – EXHIBIT E 6.3.1 Earthquakes and Faults 6-10 6.3.1.1 Regional Faults 6-10 6.3.1.2 Regional Seismicity 6-13 6.3.1.3 Local Faulting 6-17 6.3.2 Reservoir Seepage 6-17 6.3.3 Ground Subsidence 6-18 6.3.4 Active and Inactive Mines 6-18 6.4 Erosion, mass soil movement and other impacts on the geological and soil resources 6-19 6.4.1 Soil Erosion 6-19 6.4.2 Landslides and Mass Movements 6-19 6.5 Proposed measures or facilities for the mitigation of impacts on soils and geology.
Recommended publications
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental

    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental

    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
  • Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve Land Management Plan (LMP)

    Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve Land Management Plan (LMP)

    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN for INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Inyo County, California April, 2018 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -1- April, 2018 Land Management Plan INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -ii- April, 2018 Land Management Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -iv- April, 2018 Land Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES vii I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Purpose of and History of Acquisition 1 B. Purpose of This Management Plan 1 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2 A. Geographical Setting 2 B. Property Boundaries and Adjacent Lands 2 C. Geology, Soils, Climate, Hydrology 3 D. Cultural Features 13 III. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTION 15 A. Vegetation Communities, Habitats 15 B. Plant Species 18 C. Animal Species 20 D. Threatened, Rare or Endangered Species 22 IV. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 35 A. Definition of Terms Used in This Plan 35 B. Biological Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 35 C. Biological Monitoring Element: Goals & Environmental Impacts 39 D. Public Use Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 41 E. Facility Maintenance Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 44 F. Cultural Resource Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 G. Administrative Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY 48 Existing Staff and Additional Personnel Needs Summary 48 VI. CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES 48 VII. FUTURE REVISIONS TO LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS 51 VIII. REFERENCES 54 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -v- April, 2018 Land Management Plan APPENDICES: A.
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment

    Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment

    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
  • Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics.
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site

    Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site

    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2

    IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2

    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
  • Literature Cited

    Literature Cited

    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
  • Prn 198803.Pdf

    Prn 198803.Pdf

    . the mere mention of the name brings forth railroad images larger than life. It wasn't just tracks and trains.It wasn't just an Indiana institution-though it MONON'certainly was that. Oh. my, no. What the Monon was ...well, it was every American railroad. every American hometown. every American underdog rolled into one. Why. the Monon was practically human. Its birth was a cause for . rejoicing. its operation a source of Hoosier pride. And when it died. a thousand legends lived on. Now, legend and fact are woven together in a brand-new, finely crafted illustrated history of the Monon. We take you from beginning to merger into the L&N. from Louisville to French Lick to Indianapolis to Michigan City to Chicago .•. from Hoosierland to hotshot. from 4-4-0 to Century 420. We're proud to announce the creation of Monon-The Hoosier Line by Gary and Stephen Dolzall. This book is in production and will be published by Interurban Press in the Fall of 1987. Its 'edit!o�r=is=;;�=:�; Roaring Fork Railroad Begins Private Car Service. We offer three levels of service: First class, Vistadome and coach starting as low as $99 one-way Denver to Glenwood Springs. Ticket price includes open bar and fine dining in our VistaDiner. Our route over the Continental Divide includes the famous tun­ nel district and its spectacular views of the Rocky Mountain wilderness. Departs Denver every Saturday through March for Glenwood Springs, Grand Junction and Salt Lake City. Returns each Sunday. CaD (303) 893-8922 collect for reservations and information.