DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Page Executive Summary .................................................................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ...................................................................................................................1 Project Description ..............................................................................................................1 Setting ............................................................................................................................ 4 Natural Setting .....................................................................................................................4 Prehistoric Setting ...............................................................................................................5 Ethnographic Setting ...........................................................................................................8 Historic Setting.....................................................................................................................9 Methodology and Results ............................................................................................. 14 Archival Research .............................................................................................................14 Native American Contact ...................................................................................................25 Field Survey .......................................................................................................................26 Evaluation of Cultural Resources ................................................................................. 68 Regulatory Framework ......................................................................................................68 Significance Evaluation of Cultural Resources ................................................................. 73 Conclusions and Recommendations............................................................................ 79 References.................................................................................................................... 82 List of Figures Figure 1 Regional Location Map ...........................................................................................2 Figure 2 Project Location Map ..............................................................................................3 Figure 3 Survey Areas ........................................................................................................2 8 Figure 4 Cultural Resources Location Map ......................................................... Appendix D Figure 5 Photos: CA-SBR-3233H (Milligan) .......................................................................3 1 Figure 6 Photos: CA-SBR-3235H (Saltmarsh) ...................................................................3 5 Figure 7 Photos: CA-SBR-3282H (Archer) .........................................................................3 7 Figure 8 Photos: CA-SBR-3283H (Chubbuck) ...................................................................3 9 Figure 9 Photos: CA-SBR-SBR-9849H and -9851H ..........................................................4 1 Figure 10 Photos: CA-SBR-9853H (ATSF Parker Cutoff) ....................................................4 3 Figure 11 Photos: CA-SBR-9856H and -9858H ...................................................................4 4 Figure 12 Photos: CA-SBR-10646H (Sablon) ......................................................................4 6 Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project i ESA / 210324 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment November 2011 Table of Contents List of Figures (cont.) Figure 13 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................4 9 Figure 14 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 0 Figure 15 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 2 Figure 16 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 4 Figure 17 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 5 Figure 18 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 6 Figure 19 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 8 Figure 20 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................5 9 Figure 21 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................6 0 Figure 22 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................6 2 Figure 23 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................6 4 Figure 24 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................6 6 Figure 25 Photos: Newly Recorded Cutlural Resources ......................................................6 7 List of Tables Table 1 Cultural Complexes .................................................................................................... 5 Table 2 Previous Cultural Resources Investigations Conducted within 0.5 Mile of the Project Area ................................................................................................... 15 Table 3 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within 0.5 Mile of the Project Area ......... 17 Table 4 Cultral Resources Recorded or Updated during Survey ......................................... 28 Table 5 Significant Cultural Resources ................................................................................. 74 Appendices Appendix A: Personnel Qualifications Appendix B: Native American Contact Appendix C: Survey Coverage on USGS Topographic Maps (1:24000) Appendix D: Cultural Resources Location Map (Figure 4) (Confidential – bound under separate cover) Appendix E: DPR Forms (Confidential – bound under separate cover) Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project ii ESA / 210324 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment November 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), ESA is preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project (Project). The Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD) is acting as Lead Agency as the first public agency with a discretionary decision regarding the Project and because the Project will be owned in part and operated by SMWD. The Project, located on private lands in the unincorporated portion of southeast San Bernardino County, would develop a new reliable water supply and storage facility for SMWD and other participants. The proposed Project would be executed in two phases: 1) Groundwater Conservation and Recovery Component and 2) Imported Water Storage Component. The first phase involves the conservation and recovery of native groundwater that is now lost due to evaporation. Facilities that would be constructed under the first phase include a wellfield and manifold system, water conveyance facilities, a tie-in to the Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA), access roads, and power supply and distribution facilities. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15378(a), the Conservation and Recovery Component is being analyzed at a project level in the Draft EIR. The second phase includes an expanded wellfield, an extension of the water conveyance facilities, spreading basins, a CRA diversion structure and pump station, access
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental
    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1603-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE COXCOMB MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (CDCA-328), SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By J. P. Calzia, J. E. Kilburn, R. W. Simpson, Jr., and C. M. Alien U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine their mineral resource potential. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-328), California Desert Conservation Area, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California. SUMMARY Geologic, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral surveys within the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area in south­ eastern California define several areas with low to moderate potential for base and precious metals. Inferred subeconomic re­ sources of gold at the Moser mine (area Ha) are estimated at 150,000 tons averaging 1.7 ppm Au. The remainder of the study area has low potential for other mineral and energy resources including radioactive minerals and geothermal resources. Oil, gas, and coal resources are not present within the wilderness study area. INTRODUCTION Hope (1966), Greene (1968), and Calzia (1982) indicate that the wilderness study area is underlain by metaigneous and The Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area metasedimentary rocks of Jurassic and (or) older age intruded (CDCA-328) is located in the Mojave Desert of southeastern by granitic rocks of Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous age.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Guide
    National Park Service Joshua Tree National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The offi cial newspaper February – May 2017 Spring Guide Brittlebush blooms on rocky slopes near Cottonwood Springs Oasis. NPS/Brad Sutton The Desert Unsung IT’S BEEN THIRTY YEARS SINCE THE BAND U2 RELEASED THE JOSHUA Desert, and roughly half of the park’s 792,510 acres Tree in March 1987. It was this album that catapulted lie in the hotter, drier, and lower-elevation Colorado the four Irishmen to international stardom; it was this Desert—a subsection of the Sonoran Desert. album that drew the curious eyes of a generation to the otherworldly landscapes of the Southern California One great way to round out your park visit is to make desert. The iconic back cover photo by Anton Corbijn, sure you spend time in both the Mojave and the Colorado showing the band standing near a lone Joshua tree, Deserts. Even if you have only a short time in the park, cemented the association between the park and the head for the Pinto Basin and stop at one of the pullouts album—even though the picture was taken off Highway along the road. Step out of your car. Soak in the silence 190 near Death Valley, about 200 miles north of here. and admire the immensity of the vista before you. Welcome to your park. Many of the 2 million people who come to Joshua Tree From the Turkey Flats backcountry board, for example, National Park each year are specifi cally looking for Joshua you can look across vast sweeps of undeveloped I just wanted to take a moment and trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Soils and Vegetation in World War II Military Base Camps, Mojave Desert
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Recovery of soils and vegetation in World War II military base camps, Mojave Desert Doug V. Prose and Susan K. Metzger Open File Report # 85-234 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Menlo Park, California. Contents Page INTRODUCTION 4 SETTING 5 METHODS 6 Soil Studies 6 Vegetation studies 7 RESULTS 8 Soils and Surface Hydrology 8 Camp Ibis 8 Camp old Clipper 10 Camp new Clipper 11 Camp Iron Mountain 11 Camp Granite 12 Vegetation 13 Camp Ibis 13 Camp old Clipper 14 Camp new Clipper 14 Camp Iron Mountain 15 Camp Granite 16 DISCUSSION 18 REFERENCES 27 List of Illustrations Figure 1 Desert Training Center, 1942-1944. Figure 2 Recent aerial view of Camp Granite. Figure 3 Location of study area. Figure 4 Contemporary aerial photo of new and old Camp Clipper. Figure 5 Contemporary photo of main camp road at Camp Iron Mountain. Figure 6 Recent photo of road at Camp Ibis. Figure 7 Contemporary photo of vehicle parking lot. Figure 8 Recent photo of parking lot at Camp Ibis. Figure 9 Contemporary photo of tent sites and adjacent tent road. Figure 10 Recent photo of tent sites and tent road at Camp Ibis. Figure 11 Control plot at Camp Ibis. Figure 12, 12a Metzger value system explanation and example. Figure 13 Camp Ibis. Figure 14 Establishment of vegetation in disturbed areas on a previously unvegetated surface. Figure 15 Penetrometer resistance values; Camp Ibis.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino County California, U
    ADELANTO CITY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA, U. S. A. San Bernardino County. Condado de San Bernardino Officially the County of San Bernardino, is a county located in the Oficialmente, el Condado de San Bernardino, es un condado ubicado en la southern portion of the U.S. state of California, and is located within the parte sur del estado de California en los Estados Unidos, y se encuentra dentro Inland Empire area. As of the 2010 U.S. Census, the population was del área del Inland Empire. A partir del censo estadounidense de 2010, la 2,035,210, making it the fifth-most populous county in California and the población era de 2.035.210, lo que lo convierte en el quinto condado más 14th-most populous in the United States. The county seat is San Bernardino. poblado de California y el 14º más poblado de los Estados Unidos. La sede del condado es San Bernardino. While included within the Greater Los Angeles area, San Bernardino Si bien se incluye dentro del área metropolitana de Los Ángeles, el County is included in the Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario metropolitan condado de San Bernardino se incluye en el área estadística metropolitana statistical area (also known as the Inland Empire), as well as the Los Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (también conocida como Inland Empire), así Angeles–Long Beach combined statistical area. como el área estadística combinada Los Ángeles-Long Beach. With an area of 20,105 square miles (52,070 km2), San Bernardino Con un área de 20,105 millas cuadradas (52,070 km2), el condado de San County is the largest county in the United States by area, although some of Bernardino es el condado más grande de los Estados Unidos por área, aunque Alaska's boroughs and census areas are larger.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 PEIR, Draft December 2015
    3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section of the Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) describes cultural resources in the SCAG region, discusses the potential impacts of the proposed 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (“2016 RTP/SCS,” “Plan,” or “Project”) on cultural resources, identifies mitigation measures for the impacts, and evaluates the residual impacts. Cultural resources were evaluated in accordance with Appendix G of the 2015 State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Cultural resources within the SCAG region were evaluated at a programmatic level of detail, in relation to the general plans of the six counties and 191 cities within the SCAG region; review of general information characterizing the paleontological resources that have been reported from the SCAG region and review of Dibblee maps of geology and soils; general information characterizing prehistoric and historic human occupation within the SCAG region; general sensitivity of the SCAG region with respect to Native American Sacred sites and tribal cultural resources available through coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and direct outreach to tribal governments within the SCAG region, including two Native American consultation workshops hosted by SCAG during preparation of the 2016 RTP/SCS and related PEIR; and review of known cemeteries in the SCAG region; a review of related literature germane to the SCAG region; as well as a review of SCAG’s 2012 RTP/SCS PEIR.1 Cultural resources within the SCAG region are recorded in the paleontological fossils; archeological sites and artifacts, historic sites, artifacts, structures and buildings; and the built environment. There is a rich record of archived fossils that are estimated to represent over 500 million years.2 The archaeological record provides evidence of over thousands of years of human occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Colorado River Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Rice Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-4 • County: Riverside, San Bernardino • Surface Area: 189,000 acres (295 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This groundwater basin underlies Rice Valley in northeast Riverside and southeast San Bernardino Counties. Elevation of the valley floor ranges from about 675 feet above sea level near the center of the valley to about 1,000 feet along the outer margins. The basin is bounded by nonwater- bearing rocks of the Turtle Mountains on the north, the Little Maria and Big Maria Mountains on the south, the Arica Mountains on the west, and by the West Riverside and Riverside Mountains on the east. Low-lying alluvial drainage divides form a portion of the basin boundaries on the northwest and northeast, and the Colorado River bounds a portion of the basin on the east. Maximum elevations of the surrounding mountains range to about 2,000 feet in the Arica Mountains, about 3,000 feet in the Big Maria Mountains, and 5,866 feet at Horn Peak in the Turtle Mountains (Bishop 1963; Jennings 1967; USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Annual average precipitation ranges from about 3 to 5 inches. Surface runoff from the mountains drains towards the center of the valley, except in the eastern part of the valley, where Big Wash drains to the Colorado River (USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Alluvium is the water-bearing material that forms the basin and includes unconsolidated Holocene age deposits and underlying unconsolidated to semi-consolidated Pleistocene deposits (DWR 1954, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021
    Council Management Support Boy Scouts of America Unit Contacts for Katahdin Area Council #216 - Bangor, ME (Area 1) Through Month of January, 2021 Dist. Unit Commissioners Unit Contacts Recorded in Commissioner Tools *Units Percent Contacted Contacted No. District Name Units Comm Ratio Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 01 Hancock 10 2 5.0 2 2 0.0% 04 Washington 5 999.0 0.0% 05 North Star 17 1 17.0 0.0% 06 Penobscot Valley 28 4 7.0 0.0% 07 Penquis 12 2 6.0 0.0% 09 Waldo 18 999.0 0.0% 216 Council Totals** 90 9 10.0 2 2 0.0% * The Units Contacted column reflects the number of units that have had sufficient contacts recorded year-to-date. In order to show progress, a unit is counted if it has been contacted at least once by January/February, two times by March/April, three times by May/June, four times by July/August, five times by September/October and six times by November/December. For example, a unit that was not contacted until March will not be counted in January or February, but will count in March, if it receives two contacts that month. At the end of the year a unit needs at least six total contacts to be counted. Contacts are counted by the date they are entered into Commissioner Tools, not by the actual date of the contact or visit. Posts are included in 2017 and beyond; however, Exploring only districts may not be included.
    [Show full text]
  • County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed
    County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed Project List *The Proposed Project List will be finalized upon the Commission's adoption of the cities and counties eligible for funding August 3, 2018 Est. Project Est. Project Est Useful Est Useful Assembly Senate County Project Type Title Description Location Start Completion Life Min Life Max Districts Districts Colby Street from Hesperian Boulevard to Wagner Street Cornell Street from Dermody Avenue to Wagner Street Doane Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Drew Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Empire Street from Dermody Avenue to Yale Avenue Mills Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Penn Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Pomona Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Rutgers Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Road Maintenance & Alameda County 2019 Slurry Seal Project Construct slurry seal on various roadways Tulsa Street from Dermody Avenue to Mills Avenue 03/2019 12/2019 4 6 20 9, 10 Rehabilitation Vassar Avenue from Empire Street to Cornell Street Wagner Street from Colby Street to Yale Avenue Yale Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Darius Way from Altamont Road to San Leandro City Limit Howe Drive from Darius Way to end Joan Drive from Saturn Drive to Darius Way Luna Avenue from Saturn Drive to Placer Drive Midland Road from Sol Street to Altamont Road Van Avenue from 150th Avenue to Upland Road Via Cordoba from Via Diego to end Via Granada from Lewelling Boulevard to Via Linares Road Maintenance & Alameda County
    [Show full text]