DOCSLIB.ORG

County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed Project List *The Proposed Project List will be finalized upon the Commission's adoption of the cities and counties eligible for funding August 3, 2018 Est. Project Est. Project Est Useful Est Useful Assembly Senate County Project Type Title Description Location Start Completion Life Min Life Max Districts Districts Colby Street from Hesperian Boulevard to Wagner Street Cornell Street from Dermody Avenue to Wagner Street Doane Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Drew Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Empire Street from Dermody Avenue to Yale Avenue Mills Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Penn Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Pomona Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Rutgers Street from Dermody Avenue to Vassar Avenue Road Maintenance & Alameda County 2019 Slurry Seal Project Construct slurry seal on various roadways Tulsa Street from Dermody Avenue to Mills Avenue 03/2019 12/2019 4 6 20 9, 10 Rehabilitation Vassar Avenue from Empire Street to Cornell Street Wagner Street from Colby Street to Yale Avenue Yale Avenue from Empire Street to Wagner Street Darius Way from Altamont Road to San Leandro City Limit Howe Drive from Darius Way to end Joan Drive from Saturn Drive to Darius Way Luna Avenue from Saturn Drive to Placer Drive Midland Road from Sol Street to Altamont Road Van Avenue from 150th Avenue to Upland Road Via Cordoba from Via Diego to end Via Granada from Lewelling Boulevard to Via Linares Road Maintenance & Alameda County 2019 MicroSeal Project Construct asphalt rubber seal on various roadways Via Hermosa from Via Toledo to Times Avenue 03/2019 12/2019 8 10 20 10 Rehabilitation Via Marlin from Via Granada to Via Toledo Via Toledo from Via Granada to Hacienda Avenue 164th Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to East 14th Street 167th Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to East 14th Street Bartlett Avenue from Garden Avenue to Hesperian Boulevard Bay View Avenue from Ralston Way to Jacobs Street Cherry Way from Western Boulevard to Meekland Avenue Cynthia Court from Ralston Way to end Garden Avenue from Bartlett Avenue to A Street Haviland Avenue from Medford Avenue to Blossom Way Road Maintenance & 2019 Overlay Project- Alameda County Construct asphalt concrete overlay on various roadways Jacobs Court from Bay View Avenue to end 03/2019 12/2019 18 20 20 9, 10 Rehabilitation Ashland, Hayward Mosselle Court from Ralston Way to end Perlita Court from Ralston Way to end Ralston Court from Ralston Way to end Ralston Place from Ralston Way to end Ralston Way from Bay View Avenue to Woodroe Avenue Roberto Street from 170th Avenue to 173rd Avenue Robey Drive from 167th Avenue to 174th Avenue West Sunset Boulevard from Hesperian Boulevard to end Arcadian Drive from Ewing Drive to end California Street from Seven Hills to Wilson Avenue Cameo Court from Seven Hills Drive to the end Congress Way from Park Way to Lake Chabot Road Lenross Court from Seven Hills Road to the end Marciel Court from Seven Hills Road to the end Nando Court from California Street to the end Road Maintenance & 2019 Overlay Project- Park Way from Castro Valley Boulevard to Renton Way Alameda County Construct asphalt concrete overlay on various roadways 03/2019 12/2019 18 20 20 10 Rehabilitation Castro Valley San Carlos Avenue from Park Way to Stanton Avenue School Way from Almond Road to Walnut Road Seven Hills Road from Madison Avenue to Lake Chabot Road Strobridge Avenue from Castro Valley Boulevard to south of CVB Vineyard Road from Ewing Drive to Almond Road Walnut Road from Seven Hills Road to Proctor Road Watters Court from Watters Drive to end Watters Drive from Seven Hills Road to the end *All project detail is based on the Proposed Project Lists submitted to the Commission for Fiscal Year 2018-19 Program Funding and are consistent with Streets and Highways Code Sections 2030(b)(1) and 2034(a)(1). County- Fiscal Year 2018-19 Local Streets and Roads Proposed Project List *The Proposed Project List will be finalized upon the Commission's adoption of the cities and counties eligible for funding August 3, 2018 Road Maintenance & North Livermore Pavement Alameda County Rehabilitate and repair the pavement along North Livermore Avenue North Livermore Avenue from the City of Livermore City Limit to Manning Road 03/2019 12/2019 18 20 16 7 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Project Hesperian Boulevard Construct complete street improvements along a major business corridor Complete Streets Alameda County Corridor Improvement including sidewalks, class II bike lanes, street lighting, storm drains, traffic Hesperian Boulevard from I-880 to A Street 03/2019 12/2021 18 20 20 10 Components Project signals, crosswalks, pavement, landscaping and streetscaping Construct complete street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Complete Streets East Avenue Sidewalk Alameda County clean water improvements along East Avenue in the vicinity of Hayward High East Avenue from E Street to Camino Vista 07/2018 12/2019 18 20 20 10 Components Project School and East Avenue Elementary School Construct complete street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm Complete Streets Haviland Avenue Sidewalk Alameda County drain, pavement, and clean water improvements along Haviland Avenue in the Haviland Avenue from Grove Way to Blossom Way 07/2018 12/2019 18 20 20 10 Components Project vicinity of Cherryland Elementary School Construct complete street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Complete Streets Santa Maria Avenue Alameda County clean water improvements along Santa Maria Avenue in the vicinity of Castro Santa Maria Avenue from Castro Valley Boulevard to Wilson Avenue 07/2018 12/2019 18 20 20 10 Components Sidewalk Project Valley High School and the CBD along Castro Valley Boulevard Road Maintenance & Bear Valley Streets Overlay Asphalt overlay on three local subdivision roads in the Bear Valley community - Alpine County Bear Valley, California 05/2019 06/2019 10 20 5 1 Rehabilitation 2018/19 John Ebbetts Road, Cub Lane, Flynn Road Montgomery Street Guard Replace a 163 foot section of guard rail that was damaged in an automobile Alpine County Safety Rail Replacement17/18 Montgomery Street, just east of Laramie Street intersection, Markleeville, CA 07/2018 09/2018 20 30 5 1 accident. Carryover Road Maintenance & Countywide Dig-Outs Repair specific identified structural failures by removing failed surface and/or Buckhorn Ridge Road, Pioneer Volcano Road, Sutter Creek Road, Fiddletown Amador County 07/2018 07/2019 10 15 5 8 Rehabilitation Repair Project subgrade and replacing with sound material. Road, Buena Vista Road, and Stony Creek Road Restripe Roadways Stony Creek Road, Lake View Drive, Curran Road, Willow Stony Creek Road, Lake View Drive, Curran Road, Willow Creek Road, Irish Hill Creek Road, Irish Hill Road, Michigan Bar Road, Latrobe Road, Consolation Road, Michigan Bar Road, Latrobe Road, Consolation Street, Mt Zion Road, Street, Mt Zion Road, Homestead Road, Carson Drive, Buckhorn Ridge Road, Homestead Road, Carson Drive, Buckhorn Ridge Road, Tiger Creek Road, Tiger Creek Road, Meadow Vista Drive, McKenzie Drive, Barton Road, Steiner Meadow Vista Drive, McKenzie Drive, Barton Road, Steiner Road, Clinton Road, Amador County Traffic Control Devices Countywide Striping Project 09/2018 07/2019 5 7 5 8 Road, Clinton Road, Five Mile Drive, Gayla, Drive, Lupe Road, Sutter Creek Five Mile Drive, Gayla, Drive, Lupe Road, Sutter Creek Ione Road, Argonaut Lane, Ione Road, Argonaut Lane, Camanche Road, Rams Horn Grade, Shake Ridge Camanche Road, Rams Horn Grade, Shake Ridge Road, Ridge Road, Jackson Road, Ridge Road, Jackson Valley Road, New York Ranch Road, Tabeaud Valley Road, New York Ranch Road, Tabeaud Road, Tyler Road, Silver Drive, Road, Tyler Road, Silver Drive, Butte Mountain Road, and Sugar Pine Drive. Butte Mountain Road, and Sugar Pine Drive. Road Maintenance & Countywide Culvert Repair Sutter Creek Road, Martin Lane, Clinton Road, Stony Creek Road, and Latrobe Amador County Repair Culvert Crossings 11/2018 07/2019 30 50 5 8 Rehabilitation Project Road. Road Maintenance & Countywide Roadway Minor Repairs: Crack Filling and Sealing, HMA potholes, HMA patching, Amador County All County Maintained Roads 11/2018 07/2019 5 20 5 8 Rehabilitation Maintenance Project miscellaneous HMA, Rock, and Minor Facilities. Road Maintenance & Centerville Road Butte County Reconstruction Strom Damage Repairs 0.5 Miles North east of Honey Run Road Intersection 09/2018 11/2018 30 30 3 4 Rehabilitation Reconstruction Road Maintenance & Oro-Quincy Highway Butte County Reconstruction Strom Damage Repairs Site 1 in Mt. House and Site 2 is 0.75 miles North east of Site 1. 09/2018 11/2018 30 30 3 4 Rehabilitation Reconstruction Butte County Safety Skyway Median Guardrail Safety Improvement Median Guardrail 5.5 Miles East of the Intersection of Skyway and Honey Run Road. 12/2018 04/2019 30 30 3 4 Road Maintenance & Bidwell Avenue Strom Three Sites Between W. Sacramento St. on the West and Oak Lawn Ave. on the Butte County Storm Damage Repairs (Design and Permitting) 01/2019 04/2019 20 20 3 4 Rehabilitation Damage Repair East. Road Maintenance & Las Plumas Avenue Butte County Structural Overlay From Las Plumas Way to Lower Wyandotte Rd. 06/2019 08/2019 30 30 3 4 Rehabilitation Overlay *All project detail is based on the Proposed Project Lists submitted to the Commission for Fiscal Year 2018-19 Program Funding and are consistent with Streets and Highways Code Sections
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources
    3.4 Biological Resources 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.1 Introduction This section evaluates the potential for implementation of the Proposed Project to have impacts on biological resources, including sensitive plants, animals, and habitats. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) (Appendix A) identified the potential for impacts associated to candidate, sensitive, or special status species (as defined in Section 3.4.6 below), sensitive natural communities, jurisdictional waters of the United States, wildlife corridors or other significant migratory pathway, and a potential to conflict with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. Data used to prepare this section were taken from the Orange County General Plan, the City of Lake Forest General Plan, Lake Forest Municipal Code, field observations, and other sources, referenced within this section, for background information. Full bibliographic references are noted in Section 3.4.12 (References). No comments with respect to biological resources were received during the NOP comment period. The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and zone change for development of Sites 1 to 6 and creation of public facilities overlay on Site 7. 3.4.2 Environmental Setting Regional Characteristics The City of Lake Forest, with a population of approximately 77,700 as of January 2004, is an area of 16.6 square miles located in the heart of South Orange County and Saddleback Valley, between the coastal floodplain and the Santa Ana Mountains (see Figure 2-1, Regional Location). The western portion of the City is near sea level, while the northeastern portion reaches elevations of up to 1,500 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021
    Council Management Support Boy Scouts of America Unit Contacts for Katahdin Area Council #216 - Bangor, ME (Area 1) Through Month of January, 2021 Dist. Unit Commissioners Unit Contacts Recorded in Commissioner Tools *Units Percent Contacted Contacted No. District Name Units Comm Ratio Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 01 Hancock 10 2 5.0 2 2 0.0% 04 Washington 5 999.0 0.0% 05 North Star 17 1 17.0 0.0% 06 Penobscot Valley 28 4 7.0 0.0% 07 Penquis 12 2 6.0 0.0% 09 Waldo 18 999.0 0.0% 216 Council Totals** 90 9 10.0 2 2 0.0% * The Units Contacted column reflects the number of units that have had sufficient contacts recorded year-to-date. In order to show progress, a unit is counted if it has been contacted at least once by January/February, two times by March/April, three times by May/June, four times by July/August, five times by September/October and six times by November/December. For example, a unit that was not contacted until March will not be counted in January or February, but will count in March, if it receives two contacts that month. At the end of the year a unit needs at least six total contacts to be counted. Contacts are counted by the date they are entered into Commissioner Tools, not by the actual date of the contact or visit. Posts are included in 2017 and beyond; however, Exploring only districts may not be included.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Orange County, California
    San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Orange County, California Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Southern California Area Office Temecula, California August 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover Photo: San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary, Irvine, California by R.L. Kenyon, courtesy of Sea and Sage Audubon Society http://www.seaandsageaudubon.org/ Environmental Assessment San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System Project (SCH No. 2002021120) Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County, California Prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2) (C), 16 U.S.C. 470, 49 U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 138 for the Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA Cooperating Agency) and the Bureau of Reclamation (NEPA Lead Agency) August 2009 Based on information provided by Bonterra Consulting 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 The following people may be contacted for information concerning this document: Cheryl McGovern Doug McPherson Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Reclamation 75 Hawthorne Street, WTR-3 27708 Jefferson Ave.,
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Incentives for Historic Preservation in California 2017
    15 ation v Series Series ecreation R Incentives arks & arks P of Historic Preser for Department of Department California Office Office California Technical Assistance Technical Historic Preservation 1725 23rd St, Suite 100 Sacramento CA 95816 PO Box 942896 Sacramento CA 94296-0001 Phone: (916) 445-7000 fax: (916) 445-7053 [email protected] Revised March 2017 www.ohp.parks.ca.gov INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERIES #15 This publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibits unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap in its federally-assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, National· Park Service, Box 37127, Washington DC 20013-7127. © 2013 by the California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Sacramento, California All rights reserved 13 September 2013 Preface The programs listed in this document will assist anyone interested in the field of historic preservation to locate funding and incentives available to qualified historic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • When the System Works–The Campo De Cahuenga
    When the System Works–the Campo de Cahuenga Roberta S. Greenwood Abstract Angeles River (Fig. 1). The foundations of an adobe at that location were briefly uncovered by historian J. The adobe in North Hollywood where Andrés Pico and John Frémont signed the document ending the Mexican American War Marshall Miller and a group of high school students hostilities in California had fallen into ruins by 1877. In 1931, ama- in 1931. No notes or artifacts were found, but Miller teurs discovered stone foundations that corresponded to the location on hand-drawn, mid-nineteenth century maps, but left no records labeled the place Campo de Cahuenga, recorded his of their work. As new construction for Los Angeles MetroRail ap- observations, and described the hypothetical foot- proached the location, monitors observed suggestive rocks and floor tiles, and a sequence of expanding excavations revealed the full print and appearance (Miller 1932). He claimed that extent of the very large structure. Historical research disproved most the structure was built by Don Tomás Feliz in 1845, of the local lore about the owner, builder, and age of the adobe, concluding that it was older than had been suggested and associated and this date and ownership have been repeated and with Mission San Fernando. The efforts culminated in total preser- accepted uncritically for 70 years until the recent vation and dedication of an historical park on the National Register of Historic Places. research. Historical Setting The adobe, however, was described in an 1842 land claim document as a mission building already “dilapi- On January 13, 1847, General Andrés Pico and Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE of CONTENTS
    County of Orange GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND USE ELEMENT Appendix III-1 Growth Management Program Guidelines …………………………………………… 1 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Appendix IV-1 Growth Management Transportation Implementation Manual ……………………… 9 Appendix IV-2 Planning Criteria for Determining Arterial Highway Classifications ……………….. 30 Appendix IV-3 Bikeway Designation Planning Guidelines ………………………………………….. 36 Appendix IV-4 County Designation Scenic Highways and Candidate Corridors ……………………. 38 Appendix IV-5 Scenic Highways Corridor Implementation Planning Guidelines …………………… 44 Appendix IV-6 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 48 RESOURCES ELEMENT Appendix VI-1 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 56 RECREATION ELEMENT Appendix VII-1 Local Park Implementation Plan Criteria: Private Parks, Facilities and Improvements 60 Appendix VII-2 Local Park Guidelines: Site Characteristics, Acquisition, Design, Maintenance & Funding 66 Appendix VII-3 Local Park Site Criteria ……………………………………………………………… 75 Appendix VII-4 Policy for Allocating Funds for Trail Development ………………………………… 81 Appendix VII-5 Trail Descriptions …………………………………………………………………… 85 Appendix VII-6 Staging Areas ……………………………………………………………………….. 109 Appendix VII-7 Trail Design Standards ……………………………………………………………… 115 Appendix VII-8 Regional Recreation Facilities Inventory …………………………………………… 119 Appendix VII-9 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations ……………………………………………………. 129 NOISE ELEMENT Appendix VIII-1 Noise Element Definitions and Acronyms …………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • II. Project Description (Metro)
    II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT LOCATION The purpose of this Section is to identify the primary objectives and project characteristics of the Metro Universal Project (the “Project”). As discussed on the following pages, the Project would involve the construction and operation of new development on sites currently occupied by park & ride and transit bus facilities operated by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Metro”) above the Universal City Metro Red Line station. The Project is proposed to be developed on an approximately 14.34-acre site, which is located in the City of Los Angeles approximately 2 miles north of Hollywood and 10 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles (the “Project Site”). Organization of the Section A. PROJECT LOCATION B. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS a. Project Site i. Sites A & B ii. Site C iii. Site D iv. Site E b. Description of Surrounding Area i. Campo de Cahuenga Historic Site ii. Surrounding Land Uses iii. Surrounding Neighborhoods 2. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS a. Phase 1 i. Sites A and B (1) Proposed Development Metro Universal Project II. Project Description Draft Environmental Impact Report Page II-1 City of Los Angeles August 2008 (2) Parking and Transit Facilities (a) Metro Bus Transit Plaza (b) Site B Parking Garage (c) Parking to Serve the Project (d) Loading Dock (3) Access and Circulation (4) Site Plan and Design Elements (a) Pedestrian and Retail Facilities (b) Outdoor Dining Patio (c) Potential Land Exchange (d) Communication Facilities (e) Utility Improvements ii. Site C iii. Site D iv. Site E b. Phase 2 i. Sites A and B ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly Index
    Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly Volume 40, Numbers 3 & 4 Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly Index Volumes 1 - 40 (1965 - 2008) Compiled by Daniel F. McCarthy Guest Editor Daniel F. McCarthy Production Editor Rene Brace Publications Committee Bob Brace, Gail Cochlin, Scott Findlay, Megan Galway, Sherri Gust, Sandy Kennedy, Henry Koerper, Mark Roeder, and Kathleen Shada Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly The Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly is a publication of the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society (PCAS). PCAS was founded in 1961 by a group of avocational archaeologists dedicated to the study and preser- vation of the anthropological and archaeological history of the original inhabitants of Orange County, California, and adjacent areas. The PCAS Publications Committee invites the submittal of original contributions dealing with the history and prehistory of the area. Although PCAS is especially interested in reports which shed further light on the early inhabitants of Orange County, it is always interested in reports on the wider Pacific Coast region. Information about subscriptions to the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly and the PCAS Newslet- ter is available online at www.pcas.org. Back issues of the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly are available. Three Occasional Papers, on Catalina Island, Mexican Majolica, and the Peralta Adobe, have also been published by PCAS. To place an order, receive information about the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, or submit an article for publication, email [email protected] or write: Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, P.O. Box 10926, Costa Mesa, California, 92627. Additional information is available at www.pcas.org. PCAS is not responsible for delivery of publications to subscribers who have not furnished a timely change of address.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Cultural Resources
    Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES As a result of the analysis undertaken in the Initial Study for the Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan (The Master Plan), the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) determined that the proposed project may result in environmental impacts to cultural resources. Therefore, this issue is being carried forward for detailed analysis in this EIR. This analysis was undertaken to identify opportunities to avoid, reduce, or otherwise mitigate potential significant impacts to cultural resources and to identify potential alternatives. The analysis of cultural resources consists of a summary of the regulatory framework that guides the decision-making process, a description of the existing conditions at the proposed project area, thresholds for determining if the proposed project would result in significant impacts, anticipated impacts (direct, indirect, and cumulative), mitigation measures, and levels of significance after mitigation. The cultural resources at the pro- posed project site were evaluated with regard to a query of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University Fullerton, the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC), the Native American Heritage Commis- sion (NAHC), the San Fernando Valley Historical Society Website, and the County of Los Angeles Office of the Assessor’s Online Parcel Viewer (Assessor). Published and unpublished literature was reviewed. 3.4.1 Setting 3.4.1.1 Regulatory Setting Federal and state laws and regulations governing historic, archaeological, Native American, and paleontological resources must be followed by the proposed project. Correspondingly, summaries of these laws and regulations are provided hereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Noho Guidebook
    NoHo THE TRANSIT & WALKING DISTRICTS OF HISTORIC LOS ANGELES FROM LOS ANGELES MAYOR ERIC GARCETTI Dear Friends, On behalf of the City of Los Angeles, it is my pleasure to welcome everyone to Angels Walk NoHo. Thousands of Angelenos and visitors alike have taken Angels Walks in Downtown, Chinatown, Little Tokyo, the Wilshire Corridor, and Hollywood and enhanced their knowledge and appreciation of the diverse architecture, culture, and heritage of Los Angeles. It is now North Hollywood’s turn to be celebrated. There is no better way to come to know and love our great City than by walking its streets and experiencing its neighborhoods firsthand. The Angels Walk program helps to accomplish this for both visitors and locals alike in a safe, fun, and informative way. It will also connect you to convenient public transportation along the way. Angels Walk NoHo will take you through the one-square- mile community where you will see an array of eclectic arts and entertainment centers. NoHo is home to more than 20 professional theatres, diverse art galleries, pub- lic art, and great restaurants. It is also the home of the Television Academy. This Angels Walk Guidebook will show you exactly how to see the very best of NoHo. Thank you for celebrating the unique spirit of this great Los Angeles community. Very truly yours, Eric Garcetti Mayor ANGELS WALK NORTH HOLLYWOOD TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Walk .......................... 2-3 Getting There ........................................ 4 Using This Guidebook .............................. 5 ANGELS WALK® NORTH HOLLYWOOD SECTION 1 Chandler » Magnolia .............. 6-14 SECTION 2 Magnolia » Otsego .............. 15-19 SECTION 3 Magnolia » Tujunga ............
    [Show full text]
  • NO. ------18-046 DATE March 21, 2018 C.D
    BOARD REPORT NO.------- 18-046 DATE March 21, 2018 C.D. ----'4___ _ ----------~ BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: CAMPO DE CAHUENGA HISTORICAL MUSEUM - AGREEMENT WITH THE CAMPO DE CAHUENGA HISTORICAL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CAMPO DE CAHUENGA HISTORICAL MUSEUM - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE Ill, SECTION 1(14) [ISSUANCE OF LICENSE AND PERMITS TO USE AN EXISTING STRUCTURE INVOLVING NEGLIGIBLE OR NO EXPANSION OF USE] OF THE CITY CEQA GUIDELINES AP Diaz V. Israel *R. Barajas s. Pina-Cortez IN H. Fujita N. Williams .lJ.,C!.. ' Approved ______ Disapproved ______ Withdrawn ----- RECOMMENDATION($) 1. Approve the proposed Agreement between the City of Los Angeles and Campo de Cahuenga Historical Memorial Association (CDCHMA), attached hereto as Attachment 1, for the operation and maintenance of the Campo de Cahuenga Historical Museum for seven (7) years, as described more fully in the Summary below, subject to the approval of the Mayor, City Council, and City Attorney; 2. Approve the Revised Facility Use Schedule of Rates and Fees (Schedule) for the permitted use of the Campo de Cahuenga Historical Museum (Campo) as described in the Summary of this Report and proposed Agreement; 3. Authorize the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) Chief Accounting Employee to continue depositing Cost Recovery Reimbursement fees and permit revenue share proceeds received from the CDCHMA, into Special Account Fund 302, Department 89, Account 89705H, Museum, Museum Support Group; 4. Find that the proposed Agreement is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption (NOE); 5.
    [Show full text]