Docket 07-Afc-5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Docket 07-Afc-5 DOCKET 07-AFC-5 DATE SEP 24 2008 RECD. SEP 24 2008 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) (07-AFC-5) Supplemental Data Response, Set 1D (Responses to: Biological Resources) Submitted to the California Energy Commission Submitted by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC September 24, 2008 With Assistance from 2485 Natomas Park Drive Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Introduction Attached are supplemental responses (Set 1D) by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC (Applicant) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) Staff’s data requests for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) Project (07-AFC-5). These data requests are the result of the workshop discussion held at Primm, Nevada on June 23, 2008.Within each discipline area, the responses are presented in alphabetical order and are numbered for tracking and reference convenience. New graphics or tables are numbered in reference to the Supplemental Data Request number. For example, if a table were used in response to Data Request AQ-1, it would be numbered Table AQ1-1. The first figure used in response to Data Request AQ-1 would be Figure AQ1-1, and so on. AFC figures or tables that have been revised have “R1” following the original number, indicating revision 1. Additional tables, figures, or documents submitted in response to a supplemental data request (supporting data, stand-alone documents such as plans, folding graphics, etc.) are found at the end of a discipline-specific section and may not be sequentially page-numbered consistently with the remainder of the document, though they may have their own internal page numbering system. The Applicant looks forward to working cooperatively with the CEC and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) staff as the Ivanpah SEGS Project proceeds through the siting process. We trust that these responses address the Staff’s questions and remain available to have any additional dialogue the Staff may require. SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 1 INTRODUCTION Biological Resources (BR-2) BR-3 Please provide a report on the spring 2008 botany surveys of the optimized project design and include a figure showing the locations surveyed in 2007 and those surveyed in 2008. Response: The botany survey report is provided as Attachment BR3-1A. It includes a figure (Figure 2) showing the 2007 and 2008 survey areas. SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Attachment BR3-1A Technical Report: Botanical Resources of the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Solar Partners I, Solar Partners II, Solar Partners VIII, and Solar Partners IV Ivanpah Valley, San Bernardino County, California Prepared by: Garcia and Associates 1141 High Street Auburn, California 95602 Contact: Ann Howald With contributions from and reviewed by: John Carrier, Project Manager Amy Hiss, Senior Botanist CH2M HILL 2485 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 600 Sacramento, California 95833 September 2008 TAB E CNTENTS E EC TI E S MMAR III 1 INTR CTI N 1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ....................................................................................................................1 2 METH S 3 2.1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................3 2.2 PRE-FIELD PREPARATIONS....................................................................................................................4 2.3 FIELD SURVEY METHODS......................................................................................................................6 2.3.1 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS AND REFERENCE SITE VISITS .......................................................6 2.3.2 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SURVEY PROTOCOLS.......................................................................10 2.3.3 INVASIVE WEED SURVEY PROTOCOLS ...................................................................................11 2.3.4 BARREL CACTUS CENSUS METHODOLOGY.............................................................................13 2.4 METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING VEGETATION ...........................................................................................13 2.5 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATA COLLECTION,DATA ANALYSIS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE .........................................................................................................................................14 3 RES TS E ETATI N 1 3.1.1 IVANPAH 1– THE SOUTHERN SITE ........................................................................................17 3.1.2 IVANPAH 2– THE MIDDLE SITE..............................................................................................17 3.1.3 IVANPAH 3– THE NORTHERN SITE ........................................................................................18 3.1.4 UTILITY CORRIDOR .............................................................................................................19 3.1.5 CONSTRUCTION LOGISTICS AREA ........................................................................................20 3.1.6 COLOSSEUM ROAD – THE ACCESS ROAD ..............................................................................20 4 RES TS N N-NATI E IN ASI E ANTS 21 4.1 SAHARAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA TOURNEFORTII) ...................................................................................22 4.2 RED BROME (BROMUS MADRITENSIS SSP. RUBENS) ..............................................................................22 4.3 CHEAT GRASS (BROMUS TECTORUM)...................................................................................................23 4.4 RUSSIAN THISTLE (SALSOLA SP.).........................................................................................................23 4.5 LONDON ROCKET (SISYMBRIUM IRIO) ...................................................................................................23 5 RES TS S ECIA -STAT S ANTS AN BARRE CACTI 2 5.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ..........................24 5.2 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SURVEY LIMITATIONS .....................................................................................30 5.3 BARREL CACTUS DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA .......................................31 6 RE ERENCES AN ERS NA C MM NICATI NS 33 TECHNICAL REPORT: BOTANICAL RESOURCES OF THE GARCIA AND ASSOCIATES IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM SEPTEMBER 2008 i List of Tables and Figures: TABLE 1-1. IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM:LIST OF PROJECT FEATURES ..........................................1 TABLE 2-1. NON-NATIVE INVASIVE PLANTS (WEEDS) WITH THE POTENTIAL TO OCCUR WITHIN THE IVANPAH SEGS PROJECT AREA...........................................................................................................................12 TABLE 3-1. VEGETATION TYPES AND SUB-TYPES WITHIN THE PROJECT FEATURES.......................................................16 TABLE 4-1. NUMBERS OF WEED LOCATIONS FOUND WITHIN THE IVANPAH SEGS PROJECT AREA IN 2008......................21 TABLE 5-1. NUMBERS OF SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT INDIVIDUALS AND LOCALITIES BY PROJECT FEATURE.....................27 TABLE 5-2. CONSERVATION STATUS OF SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SPECIES KNOWN FROM THE IVANPAH SEGS PROJECT AREA...........................................................................................................................29 TABLE 5-3. NUMBERS OF INDIVIDUALS AND LOCATIONS OF BARREL CACTI FOUND WITHIN PROPOSED PROJECT FEATURE SITES.....................................................................................................................32 Appendixes: Appendix A: Ivanpah SEGS: Figures Appendix B: Ivanpah SEGS: Potentially Occurring Special-status Plants Appendix C: Ivanpah SEGS: Botanical Resources Field Personnel Appendix D: Ivanpah SEGS: Photos of Special-status Plants Appendix E: Ivanpah SEGS: Description of Vegetation Types Observed within Project Features Appendix F: Ivanpah SEGS: List of Plants Observed within Project Features Appendix G: Ivanpah SEGS: Distribution and Abundance of Special Status Plants Observed TECHNICAL REPORT: BOTANICAL RESOURCES OF THE GARCIA AND ASSOCIATES IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM SEPTEMBER 2008 ii Executive Summary Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners VIII, LLC, the owners of the three separate solar plants, and Solar Partners IV, LLC, the owner of shared facilities required by the three solar plants (the “Applicant”) are proposing to develop a solar facility (together referred to as the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, or Ivanpah SEGS) in the eastern Mojave Desert of Southern California. The proposed Ivanpah SEGS site is located in eastern San Bernardino County, in the Ivanpah Valley, 4.5 miles southwest of the town of Primm, Nevada. Protocol-level surveys for special-status plants were conducted throughout the project area in 2008 and 2007. The location of the site elements is shown on figures provided in Appendix A. Small adjustments to the project boundary were made in 2008; therefore, the 2008 survey boundary differs slightly from the boundaries shown on the 2007 maps. An area designated as the one-mile buffer surrounds the Property Boundary and extends out in all directions from it to a distance of one mile. Reconnaissance-level
Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Biological Control of Ambrosia Artemisiifolia in Europe: Learning from the Past
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00879.x Prospects for biological control of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe: learning from the past EGERBER*,USCHAFFNER*,AGASSMANN*,HLHINZ*,MSEIER & HMU¨ LLER-SCHA¨ RERà *CABI Europe-Switzerland, Dele´mont, Switzerland, CABI Europe-UK, Egham, Surrey, UK, and àDepartment of Biology, Unit of Ecology & Evolution, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Received 18 November 2010 Revised version accepted 16 June 2011 Subject Editor: Paul Hatcher, Reading, UK management approach. Two fungal pathogens have Summary been reported to adversely impact A. artemisiifolia in the The recent invasion by Ambrosia artemisiifolia (common introduced range, but their biology makes them unsuit- ragweed) has, like no other plant, raised the awareness able for mass production and application as a myco- of invasive plants in Europe. The main concerns herbicide. In the native range of A. artemisiifolia, on the regarding this plant are that it produces a large amount other hand, a number of herbivores and pathogens of highly allergenic pollen that causes high rates of associated with this plant have a very narrow host range sensitisation among humans, but also A. artemisiifolia is and reduce pollen and seed production, the stage most increasingly becoming a major weed in agriculture. sensitive for long-term population management of this Recently, chemical and mechanical control methods winter annual. We discuss and propose a prioritisation have been developed and partially implemented in of these biological control candidates for a classical or Europe, but sustainable control strategies to mitigate inundative biological control approach against its spread into areas not yet invaded and to reduce its A.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH, 1950 35 CENTS a Modern Moulting Set with Sparkling Gems of RUTILE RAINBOW DIAMONDS Is the Answer to Your Gift Problem
    MARCH, 1950 35 CENTS A Modern Moulting Set With Sparkling Gems of RUTILE RAINBOW DIAMONDS Is the answer to your gift problem. One of these magnificent gems set in a lovely gold or palladium ring will be a gift that will be worn and cherished for years to come. RUTILE IS THE GEM OF THE HOUR — IT IS NOW A REALITY After years of experiments, synthetic RUTILE is now available in cut gems of breathtaking beauty. This magnificent substance has been given the name of "TITANIA". "TITANIA IS QUEEN OF ALL KNOWN GEMS" Titania gems have more fire than the diamond. Be the first in your community to own one of these beautiful new Rainbow Diamonds DEALERS INQUIRIES SOLICITED Everyone to whom you show this new gem will wish to purchase one or more of them. Our SUPERCATALOG tells you of our discount plan that will permit you to own one of these new gems at no cost to yourself. Our new SUPERCATALOG described below gives you all the facts about TITANIA GEMS and ILLUSTRATES mountings especially selected for them. An article tells the story behind this amazing discovery. The 1950 Revised Edition of Grieger's "Encyclopedia and Super Catalog of the Lapidary and Jewelry Arts" $1.00 Per Copy This is a 192-page book 9"xl2" in size. There are at least 60 pages of in- structive articles by authors of national fame. There are new articles by EMIL KRONQUIST and LOUIS WIENER on jewelry making. The 15-page article on jewelry casting by the LOST WAX METHOD using the new KERR HOBBY- CRAFT CASTING UNIT is alone worth $1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    183 Liliaceae Yucca brevifolia joshua tree 5 184 Liliaceae Yucca schidigera Mohave yucca 99 1 Flora of New Dixie Mine Road Area, west of Landers Achnatherum 185 Poaceae ~ desert needlegrass 20 2 # Plants speciosum # JM Family ID? Scientific Name (*)Common Name Bloom #Vch six-weeks Obs'd 186 Poaceae Aristida adscensionis 50 99 22Oct10 three-awn 1 Pteridaceae Cheilanthes covillei beady lipfern 1 Aristida purpurea var. 187 Poaceae ssp Nealley three-awn 1 1 4 nealleyi Pentagramma 2 Pteridaceae ~ triangularis ssp. goldback fern 1 Bouteloua barbata var. 188 Poaceae six-weeks grama 20 50 10 triangularis barbata 3 Cupressaceae Juniperus californica California juniper 1 Bromus madritensis ssp. 189 Poaceae *red brome 99 2 rubens 4 Ephedraceae Ephedra californica desert tea 30 1 190 Poaceae Bromus trinii *Chilean chess 3 5 Ephedraceae Ephedra nevadensis Nevada ephedra 3 191 Poaceae Distichlis spicata saltgrass 1 6 Ephedraceae Ephedra viridis green ephedra 1 Elymus elymoides ssp. 7 Pinaceae Pinus monophylla pinyon pine 2 192 Poaceae squirreltail 2 elymoides 8 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus fimbriatus fringed amaranth 99 99 11 193 Poaceae Erioneuron pulchellum fluff grass 25 9 Apiaceae Lomatium mohavense Mojave lomatium 1 Hordeum vulgare var. 194 Poaceae *cultivated barley 1 Acamptopappus trifurcatum 10 Asteraceae ~ sphaerocephalus var. goldenhead 5 3 195 Poaceae Melica frutescens tall melica 2 sphaerocephalus 196 Poaceae Melica imperfecta coast-range melic 3 11 Asteraceae Adenophyllum cooperi Cooper's dogweed 5 20 2 197 Poaceae Muhlenbergia rigens deergrass 2 12 Asteraceae Ambrosia acanthicarpa bur-ragweed 1 198 Poaceae Pleuraphis rigida big galleta 10 99 11 13 Asteraceae Ambrosia dumosa burroweed 5 99 12 Poa secunda ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fremontia Journal of the California Native Plant Society
    $10.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1 • SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INSPIRATIONINSPIRATION ANDAND ADVICEADVICE FOR GARDENING VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA WITH NATIVE PLANTS CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] VOL. 40, NO. 3, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013 MEMBERSHIP Membership form located on inside back cover; Copyright © 2013 dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the CNPS Bulletin California Native Plant Society Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Bob Hass, Editor Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 Rob Moore, Contributing Editor Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Cynthia Powell, Cynthia Roye, and CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL Mary Ann Showers, Proofreaders 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 CALIFORNIA NATIVE STAFF – SACRAMENTO CHAPTER COUNCIL PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director: Dan Gluesenkamp David Magney (Chair); Larry Levine Finance and Administration (Vice Chair); Marty Foltyn (Secretary) Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager: Cari Porter Alta Peak (Tulare): Joan Stewart the California Native Flora Membership and Development Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono): Coordinator: Stacey Flowerdew The California Native Plant Society Steve McLaughlin Conservation Program Director: Channel Islands: David Magney (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- Greg Suba zation dedicated to increasing the Rare Plant Botanist: Aaron Sims Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ understanding and appreciation of Vegetation Program Director: Sonoma Coast): Nancy Morin California’s native plants, and to pre- Julie Evens East Bay: Bill Hunt serving them and their natural habitats Vegetation Ecologists: El Dorado: Sue Britting for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • MGS Survey Results Butte Valley
    Mohave Ground Squirrel Trapping Results for Butte Valley Wildflower Sanctuary, Los Angeles County, California Prepared Under Permit Number 000972 for: County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreations 1750 North Altadena Drive, Pasadena, California 91107 PH: (626) 398-5420 Cell: (626) 633-6948 Email: [email protected] Contact: Kim Bosell, Natural Areas Administrator Prepared by: Edward L. LaRue, Jr. (Permanent ID Number SC-001544) Circle Mountain Biological Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 3197 Wrightwood, California 92397 PH: (760) 249-4948 FAX: (760) 249-4948 Email: [email protected] Circle Mountain Biological Consultants, Inc. Author and Field Investigator: Edward L. LaRue, Jr. July 2014 Mohave Ground Squirrel Trapping Results for Butte Valley Wildflower Sanctuary, Los Angeles County, California 1.0. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Purpose and Need for Study. Herein, Edward L. LaRue, Jr., the Principal Investigator under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (expires 4/30/2016), Scientific Collecting Permit Number SC-001544, reports results of trapping surveys to assess the presence of the state-listed, Threatened Mohave ground squirrel (MGS) (Xerospermophilus mohavensis) on the subject property. This study, which was completed on the Butte Valley Wildflower Sanctuary (herein “Butte Valley” or “Sanctuary”) in northeastern Los Angeles County (Figures 1 through 3), California is authorized under Permit Number 000972. In recent decades, there have been very few MGS records in the desert region of northeastern Los Angeles County. In spite of protocol trapping efforts since 1998, the only confirmed MGS captures in Los Angeles County have been at several locations in a small area on Edwards Air Force Base (Leitner 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site R029XY072NV VALLEY WASH
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R029XY072NV VALLEY WASH Accessed: 09/23/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. Figure 1. Mapped extent Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated. Associated sites R029XY017NV LOAMY 5-8 P.Z. R029XY020NV SILTY 5-8 P.Z. Similar sites R029XY041NV DRY WASH ERNAN5-ATCO codominant shrubs; less productive site R029XY009NV UPLAND WASH ARTR2 dominant shrub; higher elevations Table 1. Dominant plant species Tree Not specified Shrub (1) Atriplex canescens (2) Ambrosia eriocentra Herbaceous (1) Achnatherum hymenoides Physiographic features This site occurs in drainageways of inset fans and axial-stream terraces. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent, but slope gradients of 2 to 8 percent are typical. Elevations are 4000 to about 5500 feet. Table 2. Representative physiographic features Landforms (1) Inset fan (2) Drainageway Elevation 4,000–5,500 ft Slope 0–15% Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features The climate associated with this site is arid, characterized by cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. Average annual precipitation is 5 to 8 inches. Mean annual air temperature is 49 to 60 degrees F. The average growing season is about 120 to 180 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Biodiversity Report
    FINAL Baseline Biodiversity Survey for Potrero Mason Property Prepared for: County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation 5500 Overland Avenue Drive, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Jennifer Price Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Brock Ortega DECEMBER 2012 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Final Baseline Biodiversity Survey Potrero Mason Property TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 MSCP Context ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of West Clear Creek Wilderness, Coconino and Yavapai
    VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA By Wendy C. McBride A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biology Northern Arizona University May 2016 Approved: Tina J. Ayers, Ph.D., Chair Randall W. Scott, Ph.D. Liza M. Holeski, Ph.D. ABSTRACT VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA WENDY C. MCBRIDE West Clear Creek Wilderness bisects the Mogollon Rim in Arizona, and is nested between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range physiographic provinces. Between 2013 and 2016, a floristic inventory vouchered 542 taxa and reviewed 428 previous collections to produce a total plant inventory of 594 taxa from 93 families and 332 genera. The most species rich families Were Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Brassicaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Cyperaceae, and Polygonaceae. Carex, Erigeron, Bromus, Muhlenbergia, and Oenothera Were the most represented genera. Nonnative taxa accounted for seven percent of the total flora. Stachys albens was vouchered as a new state record for Arizona. New county records include Graptopetalum rusbyi (Coconino), Pseudognaphalium pringlei (Coconino), Phaseolus pedicellatus var. grayanus (Coconino), and Quercus rugosa (Coconino and Yavapai). This study quantified and contrasted native species diversity in canyon versus non- canyon floras across the Southwest. Analyses based on eighteen floras indicate that those centered about a major canyon feature shoW greater diversity than non-canyon floras. Regression models revealed that presence of a canyon Was a better predictor of similarity between floras than was the distance betWeen them. This study documents the remarkable diversity found Within canyon systems and the critical, yet varied, habitat they provide in the southwestern U.S.
    [Show full text]