Ecological Site R029XY072NV VALLEY WASH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Site R029XY072NV VALLEY WASH Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R029XY072NV VALLEY WASH Accessed: 09/23/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. Figure 1. Mapped extent Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated. Associated sites R029XY017NV LOAMY 5-8 P.Z. R029XY020NV SILTY 5-8 P.Z. Similar sites R029XY041NV DRY WASH ERNAN5-ATCO codominant shrubs; less productive site R029XY009NV UPLAND WASH ARTR2 dominant shrub; higher elevations Table 1. Dominant plant species Tree Not specified Shrub (1) Atriplex canescens (2) Ambrosia eriocentra Herbaceous (1) Achnatherum hymenoides Physiographic features This site occurs in drainageways of inset fans and axial-stream terraces. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent, but slope gradients of 2 to 8 percent are typical. Elevations are 4000 to about 5500 feet. Table 2. Representative physiographic features Landforms (1) Inset fan (2) Drainageway Elevation 4,000–5,500 ft Slope 0–15% Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features The climate associated with this site is arid, characterized by cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. Average annual precipitation is 5 to 8 inches. Mean annual air temperature is 49 to 60 degrees F. The average growing season is about 120 to 180 days. Table 3. Representative climatic features Frost-free period (average) 180 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 8 in Influencing water features This site is frequently disturbed by intense, natural, flood flows. Soil features The soils associated with this site are deep alluvium from mixed sources. The soils are quite variable as they continue to be re-worked by water. These soils typically have high amounts of gravels and cobbles distributed throughout the soil profile as well as at the surface. The water intake rates are high, available water capacity is low, runoff is medium and soils are well drained. Ecological dynamics This site is frequently disturbed by intense, natural, flood flows. Hollyleaf bursage, burrobrush, and rabbitbrush are the dominant shrubs as the plant community begins to stabilize following major disturbance. Species likely to invade this site are annuals such as cheatgrass and mustards. Ratings of ecological condition and determinations of similarity index are not applicable to this site due to the inherent instability of the plant community. Fire Ecology: Fourwing saltbush is most common under regimes of infrequent fire and moderate browsing. Fire top-kills or kills fourwing saltbush, depending upon ecotype. Fourwing saltbush may sprout after top-kill. There is little mention of fire in relation to hollyleaf bursage in the literature. Downy rabbitbrush is usually top-killed by fire. It has high resin content, and both foliage and stems may be consumed, even with relatively high moisture content. Fuel distribution as well as overall fuel loading affects the potential survival of downy rabbitbrush. Downy rabbitbrush regenerates after fire by sprouting and by establishing from off-site seed. Nevada ephedra generally sprouts after fire damages aboveground vegetation. Underground regenerative structures commonly survive when aboveground vegetation is consumed by fire. However, severe fires may kill shallowly buried regenerative structures. Purple sage has a high tolerance to fire and will resprout following fire. Fire generally kills hollyleaf bursage. Indian ricegrass can be killed by fire, depending on severity and season of burn. Indian ricegrass reestablishes on burned sites through seed dispersed from adjacent unburned areas. State and transition model Figure 3. DRAFT STM Figure 4. DRAFT STM LEGEND State 1 Reference State Community 1.1 Reference Plant Community The reference plant community is dominated by fourwing saltbush and hollyleaf bursage. Potential vegetative composition is about 5% grasses, 15% annual and perennial forbs and 80% shrubs. Approximate ground cover (basal and crown) is less than 10 percent (~7%). Table 4. Annual production by plant type Low Representative Value High Plant Type (Lb/Acre) (Lb/Acre) (Lb/Acre) Shrub/Vine 160 400 560 Forb 30 75 105 Grass/Grasslike 10 25 35 Total 200 500 700 Additional community tables Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition Annual Production Foliar Cover Group Common Name Symbol Scientific Name (Lb/Acre) (%) Grass/Grasslike 1 Primary Perennial Grasses 10–50 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 3–15 – threeawn ARIST Aristida 3–15 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 3–15 – needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 3–15 – sand dropseed SPCR Sporobolus cryptandrus 3–15 – Forb 2 Perennial 12–75 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 3–15 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 3–15 – needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 3–15 – sand dropseed SPCR Sporobolus cryptandrus 3–15 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 3–15 – smoothstem MELA2 Mentzelia laevicaulis 3–15 – blazingstar beardtongue PENST Penstemon 3–15 – globemallow SPHAE Sphaeralcea 3–15 – 3 Annual 1–25 Shrub/Vine 4 Primary Shrubs 290–490 fourwing saltbush ATCA2 Atriplex canescens 150–200 – woolly fruit bur AMER Ambrosia eriocentra 100–150 – ragweed yellow rabbitbrush CHVIP4 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus ssp. puberulus 25–75 – Nevada jointfir EPNE Ephedra nevadensis 10–40 – purple sage SADOI Salvia dorrii ssp. dorrii var. incana 5–25 – 5 Secondary Shrubs 25–75 yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 5–15 – brittlebush ENCEL Encelia 5–15 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNAN5 Ericameria nauseosa ssp. nauseosa var. 5–15 – nauseosa broom snakeweed GUSA2 Gutierrezia sarothrae 5–15 – burrobrush HYMEN3 Hymenoclea 5–15 – water jacket LYAN Lycium andersonii 5–15 – banana yucca YUBA Yucca baccata 5–15 – Animal community Livestock Interpretations: This site is suited to livestock grazing. Grazing management should be keyed to perennial grass production. Indian ricegrass has good forage value for domestic sheep, cattle and horses. It supplies a source of green feed before most other native grasses have produced much new growth. Fourwing saltbush is one of the most palatable shrubs in the West. Its protein, fat, and carbohydrate levels are comparable to alfalfa. It provides nutritious forage for all classes of livestock. Palatability is rated as good for domestic sheep and domestic goats; fair for cattle; fair to good for horses in winter, poor for horses in other seasons. Downy rabbitbrush is tolerant of grazing and may be rejuvenated by foliage removal. Downy rabbitbrush commonly increases on degraded rangelands as more palatable species are removed. Nevada ephedra is important winter range browse for domestic cattle, sheep and goats. Purple sage has low to medium platability for livestock. Stocking rates vary over time depending upon season of use, climate variations, site, and previous and current management goals. A safe starting stocking rate is an estimated stocking rate that is fine tuned by the client by adaptive management through the year and from year to year. Wildlife Interpretations: Fourwing saltbush provides valuable habitat and year-round browse for wildlife. Fourwing saltbush also provides browse and shelter for small mammals. Additionally, the browse provides a source of water for black-tailed jackrabbits in arid environments. Granivorous birds consume the fruits. Wild ungulates, rodent and lagomorphis readily consume all aboveground portions of the plant. Palatability is rated good for deer, elk, pronghorn and bighorn sheep. Downy rabbitbrush provides an important source of browse for wildlife, particularly in the late fall and early winter after more palatable species have been depleted. Wild ungulates show varying preference for Douglas’ rabbitbrush depending on season, locality, and subspecies. Mature or partially mature plants are generally preferred to green, immature ones. Downy rabbitbrush provides important cover for pronghorn fawns. In parts of the Great Basin, plants regrew rapidly after they were nearly completely consumed by spring-browsing black-tailed jackrabbits. Mule deer, bighorn sheep, and pronghorn browse Nevada ephedra, especially in spring and late summer when new growth is available. Purple sage has low to medium platability for wildlife. Indian ricegrass is an important forage for several wildlife species. Hydrological functions Runoff is medium. Recreational uses Aesthetic value is derived from the diverse floral and faunal composition and the colorful flowering of wild flowers and shrubs during the spring and early summer. This site offers rewarding opportunities to photographers and for nature study. This site is used for camping and hiking and has potential for upland and big game hunting. Other products Fourwing saltbush is traditionally important to Native Americans. They ground the seeds for flour. The leaves, placed on coals, impart a salty flavor to corn and other roasted food. Top-growth produces a yellow dye. Young leaves and shoots were used to dye wool and other materials. The roots and flowers were ground to soothe insect bites. Downy rabbitbrush can be a source of rubber and possibly valuable resins. Native Americans used Nevada ephedra
Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Biological Control of Ambrosia Artemisiifolia in Europe: Learning from the Past
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00879.x Prospects for biological control of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe: learning from the past EGERBER*,USCHAFFNER*,AGASSMANN*,HLHINZ*,MSEIER & HMU¨ LLER-SCHA¨ RERà *CABI Europe-Switzerland, Dele´mont, Switzerland, CABI Europe-UK, Egham, Surrey, UK, and àDepartment of Biology, Unit of Ecology & Evolution, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Received 18 November 2010 Revised version accepted 16 June 2011 Subject Editor: Paul Hatcher, Reading, UK management approach. Two fungal pathogens have Summary been reported to adversely impact A. artemisiifolia in the The recent invasion by Ambrosia artemisiifolia (common introduced range, but their biology makes them unsuit- ragweed) has, like no other plant, raised the awareness able for mass production and application as a myco- of invasive plants in Europe. The main concerns herbicide. In the native range of A. artemisiifolia, on the regarding this plant are that it produces a large amount other hand, a number of herbivores and pathogens of highly allergenic pollen that causes high rates of associated with this plant have a very narrow host range sensitisation among humans, but also A. artemisiifolia is and reduce pollen and seed production, the stage most increasingly becoming a major weed in agriculture. sensitive for long-term population management of this Recently, chemical and mechanical control methods winter annual. We discuss and propose a prioritisation have been developed and partially implemented in of these biological control candidates for a classical or Europe, but sustainable control strategies to mitigate inundative biological control approach against its spread into areas not yet invaded and to reduce its A.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 07-Afc-5
    DOCKET 07-AFC-5 DATE SEP 24 2008 RECD. SEP 24 2008 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) (07-AFC-5) Supplemental Data Response, Set 1D (Responses to: Biological Resources) Submitted to the California Energy Commission Submitted by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC September 24, 2008 With Assistance from 2485 Natomas Park Drive Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Introduction Attached are supplemental responses (Set 1D) by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC (Applicant) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) Staff’s data requests for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) Project (07-AFC-5). These data requests are the result of the workshop discussion held at Primm, Nevada on June 23, 2008.Within each discipline area, the responses are presented in alphabetical order and are numbered for tracking and reference convenience. New graphics or tables are numbered in reference to the Supplemental Data Request number. For example, if a table were used in response to Data Request AQ-1, it would be numbered Table AQ1-1. The first figure used in response to Data Request AQ-1 would be Figure AQ1-1, and so on. AFC figures or tables that have been revised have “R1” following the original number, indicating revision 1. Additional tables, figures, or documents submitted in response to a supplemental data request (supporting data, stand-alone documents such as plans, folding graphics, etc.) are found at the end of a discipline-specific section and may not be sequentially page-numbered consistently with the remainder of the document, though they may have their own internal page numbering system.
    [Show full text]
  • Fremontia Journal of the California Native Plant Society
    $10.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1 • SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INSPIRATIONINSPIRATION ANDAND ADVICEADVICE FOR GARDENING VOL. 40, NO. 3 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND JANUARY 2013 FREMONTIA WITH NATIVE PLANTS CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] VOL. 40, NO. 3, SEPTEMBER 2012 AND VOL. 41, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013 MEMBERSHIP Membership form located on inside back cover; Copyright © 2013 dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the CNPS Bulletin California Native Plant Society Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Bob Hass, Editor Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 Rob Moore, Contributing Editor Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Cynthia Powell, Cynthia Roye, and CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL Mary Ann Showers, Proofreaders 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 CALIFORNIA NATIVE STAFF – SACRAMENTO CHAPTER COUNCIL PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director: Dan Gluesenkamp David Magney (Chair); Larry Levine Finance and Administration (Vice Chair); Marty Foltyn (Secretary) Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager: Cari Porter Alta Peak (Tulare): Joan Stewart the California Native Flora Membership and Development Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono): Coordinator: Stacey Flowerdew The California Native Plant Society Steve McLaughlin Conservation Program Director: Channel Islands: David Magney (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- Greg Suba zation dedicated to increasing the Rare Plant Botanist: Aaron Sims Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ understanding and appreciation of Vegetation Program Director: Sonoma Coast): Nancy Morin California’s native plants, and to pre- Julie Evens East Bay: Bill Hunt serving them and their natural habitats Vegetation Ecologists: El Dorado: Sue Britting for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List
    Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Disclaimer Lake Havasu City has revised the recommended landscaping plant list. This new list consists of plants that can be adapted to desert environments in the Southwestern United States. This list only contains water conscious species classified as having very low, low, and low-medium water use requirements. Species that are classified as having medium or higher water use requirements were not permitted on this list. Such water use classification is determined by the type of plant, its average size, and its water requirements compared to other plants. For example, a large tree may be classified as having low water use requirements if it requires a low amount of water compared to most other large trees. This list is not intended to restrict what plants residents choose to plant in their yards, and this list may include plant species that may not survive or prosper in certain desert microclimates such as those with lower elevations or higher temperatures. In addition, this list is not intended to be a list of the only plants allowed in the region, nor is it intended to be an exhaustive list of all desert-appropriate plants capable of surviving in the region. This list was created with the intention to help residents, businesses, and landscapers make informed decisions on which plants to landscape that are water conscious and appropriate for specific environmental conditions. Lake Havasu City does not require the use of any or all plants found on this list. List Characteristics This list is divided between trees, shrubs, groundcovers, vines, succulents and perennials.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTERACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M
    Comparative Seed Manual: ASTERACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M. VanDerwarker (Completed, April 17, 2019) This seed manual consists of photos and relevant information on plant species housed in the Integrative Subsistence Laboratory at the Anthropology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara. The impetus for the creation of this manual was to enable UCSB graduate students to have access to comparative materials when making in-field identifications. Most of the plant species included in the manual come from New World locales with an emphasis on Eastern North America, California, Mexico, Central America, and the South American Andes. Published references consulted1: 1998. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American ethnobotany. Vol. 879. Portland, OR: Timber press. 2009. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American medicinal plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. 2010. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American food plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. Species included herein: Achillea lanulosa Achillea millefolium Ambrosia chamissonis Ambrosia deltoidea Ambrosia dumosa Ambrosia eriocentra Ambrosia salsola Artemisia californica Artemisia douglasiana Baccharis pilularis Baccharis spp. Bidens aurea Coreopsis lanceolata Helianthus annuus 1 Disclaimer: Information on relevant edible and medicinal uses comes from a variety of sources, both published and internet-based; this manual does NOT recommend using any plants as food or medicine without first consulting a medical professional. Achillea lanulosa Family: Asteraceae Common Names: Yarrow, California Native Yarrow, Common Yarrow, Western Yarrow, Mifoil Habitat and Growth Habit: This plant is distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere. It is native in temperate areas of North America. There are both native and introduced species in areas creating hybrids. Human Uses: This plant has a positive fragrance making it desired in gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Propagation Protocol for ​Ambrosia Trifida ESRM
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Ambrosia trifida ​ ESRM 412 - Native Plant Production Spring 2020 Figure 1 Photo by Louis-M. Landry from CalPhotos. Web. 27 May 2020. North American Distribution Washington Distribution TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Asteraceae ⁄ Compositae1 ​ Common Name Aster family1 ​ Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Ambrosia trifida L. (author is L.)1 ​ ​ Varieties Ambrosia trifida var. Trifida Ambrosia trifida var. Texana (Scheele) (Does ​ not grown in WA)12 ​ Ambrosia trifida var. integrifolia (Muhl. ex ​ Willd.) Torr. & A. Gray Ambrosia trifida var. aptera (DC.) Kuntze2 ​ ​ Sub-species No information found. Cultivar No information found. Common Synonym(s) Ambrosia aptera DC.2 ​ ​ Common Names Ragweed in Cherokee: ᎤᏆᏍᏓᎷᏱᏓ/ugwasdaluhyda/ụgwạsdaluhyda 14 canhlōģaŋ paŋśpaŋjela which means “bulky weed” and another Lakota phrase used to describe this plant is yamnūumnuģa iyécéca which means “it is like making a noise by crunching your teeth”. They say this because this plant’s seeds are very hard.8 ​ great ragweed, giant ragweed, horseweed1, 2 ​ bursage, Texan great ragweed, tall ragweed, blood ragweed, perennial ragweed2 ​ Bitterweed, Bloodweed, Buffalo Weed, Horse Cane, crown-weed3 ​ Species Code (as per USDA Plants database) AMTR1 ​ GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Located in two counties in Eastern WA. Also prominent in Eastern N. America - Quebec to Florida, west to Manitoba, Colorado and Mexico.3 ​ Ecological distribution Suitable for: light (sandy), medium (loamy) and heavy (clay) soils. Suitable pH: acid, neutral and basic (alkaline) soils. It can grow in semi-shade (light woodland) or no shade. It prefers moist soil.3 ​ It can be found in disturbed areas of moist to mesic black soil prairies, especially along the margins near woodlands or fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site R040XB216AZ Sandy Wash 7"-10" P.Z
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R040XB216AZ Sandy Wash 7"-10" p.z. Accessed: 09/26/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. Figure 1. Mapped extent Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated. MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 040X–Sonoran Basin and Range AZ 40.2 – Middle Sonoran Desert Elevations range from 1200 to 2000 feet and precipitation averages 7 to 10 inches per year. Vegetation includes saguaro, palo verde, creosotebush, triangle bursage, brittlebush, prickly pear, cholla, desert saltbush, wolfberry bush muhly, threeawns, and big galleta. The soil temperature regime is hyperthermic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic. This unit occurs within the Basin and Range Physiographic Province and is characterized by numerous mountain ranges that rise abruptly from broad, plain-like valleys and basins. Igneous and metamorphic rock classes dominate the mountain ranges and sediments filling the basins represent combinations of fluvial, lacustrine, colluvial and alluvial deposits. Table 1. Dominant plant species Tree (1) Parkinsonia florida (2) Parkinsonia microphylla Shrub (1) Baccharis sarothroides (2) Salix gooddingii Herbaceous (1) Digitaria californica Physiographic features This site occurs on floodplains and alluvial fans. It benefits on a rgualr basis fro extra moisture received as overbank flooding and/or runoff from adjacent upland sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Four River Flora
    The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora, Maricopa County, Arizona by Darin Jenke A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2011 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kathleen B. Pigg, Co-Chair Leslie R. Landrum, Co-Chair Elizabeth Makings ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2011 ABSTRACT The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora is an inventory of all the vascular plants growing along the Salt, Gila, New and Agua Fria Rivers, and their tributaries in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area during the years of the study (2009-2011). This floristic inventory documents the plant species and habitats that exist currently in the project area, which has changed dramatically from previous times. The data gathered by the flora project thus not only documents how the current flora has been altered by urbanization, but also will provide a baseline for future ecological studies. The Phoenix Metropolitan Area is a large urbanized region in the Sonoran Desert of Central Arizona, and its rivers are important for the region for many uses including flood control, waste water management, recreation, and gravel mining. The flora of the rivers and tributaries within the project area is extremely diverse; the heterogeneity of the systems being caused by urbanization, stream modification for flood control, gravel mining, and escaped exotic species. Hydrological changes include increased runoff in some areas because of impermeable surfaces (e.g. paved streets) and decreased runoff in other areas due to flood retention basins. The landscaping trade has introduced exotic plant species that have escaped into urban washes and riparian areas. Many of these have established with native species to form novel plant associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Course Vegetation on Granitic and Calcareous Substrates in the Eastern Mojave Desert, California
    WATER COURSE VEGETATION ON GRANITIC AND CALCAREOUS SUBSTRATES IN THE EASTERN MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA by Julie M. Evens A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Biology May, 2000 WATER COURSE VEGETATION ON GRANITIC AND CALCAREOUS SUBSTRATES IN THE EASTERN MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA by Julie M. Evens We certify that we have read this study and that it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully acceptable, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Approved by the Master's Thesis Committee P. Dawn Goley Todd Keeler-Wolf Michael R. Mesler Milton J. Boyd, Graduate Coordinator Approved by the Dean of Graduate Studies Ronald A. Fritzsche ABSTRACT Desert water courses are topographically distinct features with periodic flooding, which are floristically rich and structurally complex. This study was undertaken to determine if plant species and vegetation types change along desert water courses as environmental gradients are crossed. In four granitic and four calcareous water courses, vegetation patterns were classified and described for 262 samples in the eastern Mojave Desert, California. In a broad altitudinal range from mountain slope to bajada, vegetation samples were systematically taken at 300 m intervals in a 9 km distance of each water course. A total of 15 alliances and 32 associations were delineated using Ward's method cluster analysis and Twinspan and were validated by Bray-Curtis ordination. The classification included alliances of one forest, two woodlands, two intermittently flooded shrublands, two temporarily flooded shrublands, and eight shrublands.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Havasu National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Plants of Havasu National Wildlife Refuge The Havasu NWR plant list was developed by volunteer Baccharis salicifolia P S N John Hohstadt. As of October 2012, 216 plants have been mulefat documented at the refuge. Baccharis brachyphylla P S N Legend shortleaf baccharis *Occurance (O) *Growth Form (GF) *Exotic (E) Bebbia juncea var. aspera P S N A=Annual G=Grass Y=Yes sweetbush P=Perennial F=Forb N=No Calycoseris wrightii A F N B=Biennial S=Shrub T=Tree white tackstem Calycoseris parryi A F N Family yellow tackstem Scientific Name O* GF* E* Chaenactis carphoclinia A F N Common Name pebble pincushion Agavaceae—Lilies Family Chaenactis fremontii A F N Androstephium breviflorum P F N pincushion flower pink funnel lily Conyza canadensis A F N Hesperocallis undulata P F N Canadian horseweed desert lily Chrysothamnus Spp. P S N Aizoaceae—Fig-marigold Family rabbitbrush Sesuvium sessile A F N Encelia frutescens P S N western seapurslane button brittlebrush Encelia farinosa P S N Aizoaceae—Fig-marigold Family brittlebrush Trianthema portulacastrum A F N Dicoria canescens A F N desert horsepurslane desert twinbugs Amaranthaceae—Amaranth Family Antheropeas wallacei A F N Amaranthus retroflexus A F N woolly easterbonnets redroot amaranth Antheropeas lanosum A F N Tidestromia oblongifolia P F N white easterbonnets Arizona honeysweet Ambrosia dumosa P S N burrobush Apiaceae—Carrot Family Ambrosia eriocentra P S N Bowlesia incana P F N woolly fruit bur ragweed hoary bowlesia Geraea canescens A F N Hydrocotyle verticillata P F N hairy desertsunflower whorled marshpennywort Gnaphalium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • SNRPC Regional Plant List
    1 Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition Regional Plant List Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition RegionalRegional PlantPlant ListList ApprovedApproved JuneJune 28,28, 20112011 1 Acknowledgements This Regional Plant List has been the effort of literally countless hours of work from members of the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition’s (SNRPC) Regional Urban Forestry Work Group and local arboriculture and horticulture experts. Special thanks go to the following individuals for their contributions: Shane Ammerman, Clark County Paul Andricopulos, Chair, City of Henderson Cleto Arceo, NV Energy Andréa Baker, Southern Nevada Water Authority Dave Cornoyer, City of Las Vegas Adria DeCorte, Nevada Division of Forestry Greg Deuley, TruGreen Landcare Paula Garrett, University of Nevada Las Vegas Steve Glimp, Schilling Horticulture Group, Inc. Bob Hoyes, City of North Las Vegas Jon Jainga, City of North Las Vegas Michael Johnson, City of Henderson John Jones, City of North Las Vegas Teri Knight, United States Department of Agriculture Matt Koepnick, Nevada Division of Forestry Paul Noe, Star Nursery Lisa Ortega, City of Henderson Craig Palmer, University of Nevada Las Vegas Alan Paulson, Clark County School District Lynn Phelps, professional arborist M.L. Robinson, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Norm Schilling, Schilling Horticulture Group, Inc. Daniel Sinagra, Clark County Dennis Swartzell, Horticultural Consultants, Inc. Russ Thompson, Clark County Amie Wojtech, City of Henderson On the cover: Acacia Demonstration
    [Show full text]