Do We Have Enough Bibles Yet? English Bible Translations and the Transitions Through Time

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Do We Have Enough Bibles Yet? English Bible Translations and the Transitions Through Time Southeastern University FireScholars Selected Honors Theses Fall 2019 DO WE HAVE ENOUGH BIBLES YET? ENGLISH BIBLE TRANSLATIONS AND THE TRANSITIONS THROUGH TIME Allison C. Stephan Southeastern University - Lakeland Follow this and additional works at: https://firescholars.seu.edu/honors Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Language Interpretation and Translation Commons, and the Translation Studies Commons Recommended Citation Stephan, Allison C., "DO WE HAVE ENOUGH BIBLES YET? ENGLISH BIBLE TRANSLATIONS AND THE TRANSITIONS THROUGH TIME" (2019). Selected Honors Theses. 112. https://firescholars.seu.edu/honors/112 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by FireScholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Selected Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of FireScholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DO WE HAVE ENOUGH BIBLES YET? ENGLISH BIBLE TRANSLATIONS AND THE TRANSITIONS THROUGH TIME by Allison Stephan Submitted to the School of Honors Committee in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors Scholars Southeastern University 2019 Stephan ii Copyright by Allison Stephan 2019 Stephan iii Abstract The Bible is read in a variety of contexts, but with the hundreds of translations in English and controversy over which is “most accurate” or “best,” this thesis examines a brief history of Bible translation, a few translation theories such as formal and functional equivalence, what to look for in a Bible translation, and some of the most common English Bible translations. A study was conducted with college students, focusing primarily on the purpose of each translation and the people who read a specified version. Finally, this thesis supports the usage of different translations in different contexts, according to the purpose and audience. The discussion affirms the idea that the Bible is the Word of God, inerrant and inspired by God, and it should be our final authority. KEY WORDS: accuracy, Bible, English Standard Version (ESV), formal equivalence, functional equivalence, Good News Bible (GNB), King James Version (KJV), New American Standard Bible (NASB), New International Version (NIV), New King James Version (NKJV), New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), Revised Standard Version (RSV), The Message (MSG), The Passion Translation (TPT), translation. Stephan iv Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the help of my boss and advisor, Professor Amy Beatty. I am grateful for being able to use her office space and for her support throughout this research project. She has been both a friend and mentor, remaining confident in my ability to complete this project to the best of my ability. She additionally provided both professional and personal guidance about research and life. I am also thankful for the support from my family, especially my mother Melissa Stephan for her wise counsel and for posing challenging questions that encouraged me to further investigate this topic. She remained constant and pushed me to do better. I could not have completed this thesis without both Amy Beatty and Melissa Stephan and will be forever grateful that they have such pronounced influences in my life. Stephan v Table of Contents I. A Personal Note..……………………………………………………….……………………….1 II. Introduction…...…………………………………………………………………………….….3 III. Literature Review...………………………………………………………………………...….6 Major Bible translation theories……………………………………………...…...……….9 Formal equivalence translations…………………………………………………………11 Intermediate translations…………………………………………………….…………...16 Functional equivalence translations……………………………………………….……..17 Surveys regarding English Bible translations……………………………………...…….20 Choosing a translation…………………………………………………………..………..21 IV. Methodology.………….……………………………………………………………………..24 V. Analysis of Data……………..………………………………………………………………..27 VI. Conclusion……………………………………………..……………………………..……...42 Appendix A..…………………………………………..……………………………..…………..44 Appendix B………………………………………………………………………………...…….45 Works Cited………………....…………………………………………………………………...46 Stephan 1 I. A PERSONAL NOTE As one who has been exposed to church lingo for the entirety of my lifetime, I have been exposed to a variety of denominations and translations, particularly the Lutheran denomination with the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) and the New International version (NIV). However, I began reading the New Living Translation (NLT) and the English Standard Version (ESV) in high school in order to better understand passages using a different vocabulary and wording. I often had the impression that more meaning-based translations were taboo to read as they were seen as “inaccurate,” and the NLT was the “furthest” I could sway from more literal translations without jeopardizing the accuracy of Scripture. Throughout the research and writing of this thesis, my own perspective regarding Bible translations in English shifted from being frustrated at the plethora of translations in our own language about which we are so selective, to only liking certain translations, to finally, now, understanding the purposes of each version in the proper context. I encourage the reader to glean with an open mind and think beyond his/her set beliefs. In the process of learning about Bible translations in languages other than English and understanding the amount of research and work that the translators put into these smaller language groups’ translations, I have come to recognize similar efforts in the English Bible translations. I had the opportunity during the summer of 2019 to be in Southeast Asia and talk with several translators of minority language groups about their past and current work in various languages. The linguists and mother-tongue translators used a second or third common language to communicate (L2 or L3), and I taught the mother-tongue translators English in order to assist with communication during the translation process. My students were very eager to learn, and Stephan 2 each knew three to six languages, including now English. One of my students was a pastor and had read the Bible five times but not in his first language, as they are currently working on a translation for his native tongue. In class, however, we read the Gospel of Luke in the Good News Translation (GNT), also called the Good News Bible (GNB) and Today’s English Version (TEV). It is a simpler and easier version of the English Bible to read, using the dynamic equivalence method of translation, and it was what was suggested for us to read (“Good News Bible”). It also contains occasional drawings that are small and simple, adding to the passages. In comparing the GNB and the ESV, a more literal translation, I noticed many differences in wording. These differences, however, do not necessarily take away from the meaning, but rather the GNB merely has a lower level of vocabulary. For example, instead of “repent,” the phrase “turn away from your sins” is used (Good News Bible: The Bible in Today’s English Version). To a biblical scholar, these concepts arguably mean something somewhat different, but for an individual learning English, it makes more sense and is the first step to understanding the full concept of repentance, especially if the person does not know the word at all and is unfamiliar with Christianity. The everyday language use is suitable in this case. I was able to see firsthand how a translation that I, being a native speaker of English and having been raised in a Christian home, would not personally use, does, in fact, have a very important purpose and is useful in learning both English and Scripture. I will definitely continue to use the GNB in the future when teaching children, to people who do not know about Scripture, and to individuals whose first language is not English. Overall, it also encouraged me to study other English Bible translations and better understand the purposes of each, even if I personally would not prefer to use them. Stephan 3 Do We Have Enough Bibles Yet? English Bible Translations and the Transitions Through Time II. INTRODUCTION Unlike the early churchgoer, today’s attendee has numerous versions of the Bible from which to choose. This thesis includes a literature review focused on analyzing various English Bible translations collected from online databases, libraries, websites of mission organizations, and videos from individuals educated in English translations of Scripture, including the translators themselves. I examined literature from scholarly authors, teachers, missionaries, and experts in the field in order to collect and analyze the most reliable and thorough data. From about 1600 to 1993, over 290 versions of the Bible were translated into English, and therefore most of my information comes from this time period and in the years after (Vance). A majority of the information is geographically based in Western cultures where English is the people’s first language. The literature review provides a concise history of Bible translation in English and defines a few translation theories that are most commonly used. An overview of some well- known Bible translations is presented, discussing the translators, their purposes and the people who read the translations. Strengths and weaknesses of some versions are presented in order to bring awareness to the uses of the translations, and specific elements are recommended regarding criteria to keep in mind when choosing a translation. This thesis also includes a survey of college students
Recommended publications
  • The Old Greek of Isaiah Septuagint and Cognate Studies
    The Old Greek Of IsaIah Septuagint and Cognate Studies Editor Wolfgang Kraus Editorial Board Robert Hiebert Karen H. Jobes Siegfried Kreuzer Arie van der Kooij Volume 61 The Old Greek Of IsaIah The Old Greek Of IsaIah an analysIs Of ITs Pluses and MInuses MIrjaM van der vOrM-CrOuGhs SBL Press Atlanta Copyright © 2014 by SBL Press All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, SBL Press, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Van der Vorm-Croughs, Mirjam. The old Greek of Isaiah : an analysis of its pluses and minuses / Mirjam van der Vorm-Croughs. pages cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature Septuagint and cognate stud- ies ; no. 61) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58983-978-6 (paper binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983- 980-9 (electronic format) — ISBN 978-1-58983-979-3 (hardcover binding : alk. paper) 1. Bible. Isaiah. Greek—Versions—Septuagint. 2. Bible. Isaiah—Language, style. 3. Greek language, Biblical. 4. Hebrew language. I. Title. BS1514.G7S486 2014 224’.10486—dc23 2014010033 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 CONTENTS Preface ix Abbreviations xi CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Translations of Psalm 23A
    Various Translations of Psalm 23a Jeffrey D. Oldham 2006 Feb 17 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 List of Abbreviations . 4 I Translations in the Tyndale-King James Tradition 5 2 The King James Version (1611) 5 3 The Revised Version (1885) 6 4 American Standard Version (1901) 7 5 Revised Standard Version (1952) 8 6 New Revised Standard Version (1989) 9 7 New American Standard (1971) 10 8 New King James Version (1982) 11 II Catholic Translations 12 9 Rheims-Douay (1610) 12 10 Knox (1950) 13 11 The Jerusalem Bible (1966) 14 12 The New Jerusalem Bible (1985) 15 13 The New American Bible (1970) 16 III Jewish Translations 17 a c 2005 Jeffrey D. Oldham ([email protected]). All rights reserved. This document may not be distributed in any form without the express permission of the author. 14 The JPS’s Masoretic Translation (1917) 17 15 The Tanakh (1985) 18 IV British Translations 19 16 The New English Bible (1970) 19 17 Revised English Bible (1989) 20 V Conservative Protestant Translations 21 18 Amplified Bible (1965) 21 19 New International Version (1978) 22 20 English Standard Version (2001) 23 21 The New Living Translation (1996) 24 VI Modern Language and Easy-to-Read Translations 25 22 Moffatt (1926) 25 23 Smith-Goodspeed (1927) 26 24 Basic English Bible (1949) 27 25 New Berkeley Version (1969) 28 26 Today’s English Version (1976) 29 27 Contemporary English Version (1995) 30 28 New Century Version (1991) 31 VII Paraphrases 32 29 The Living Bible (1971) 32 30 The Message (2002) 33 VIII Other 34 31 Septuagint Bible by Charles Thomson (1808) 34 2 1 Introduction There are about two dozen English-language Bibles currently in circulation in the States and about as many have previously been in circulation, but few of us ever examine more the our favorite translation.
    [Show full text]
  • January 3, 2007
    HOW TO CITE THE BIBLE Guide for Four Citation Styles: MLA, APA, SBL, CHICAGO MLA [Refer to MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 7th ed. (2009), sections 6.4.8, 7.7.1]. Copy at Reference Desk. General Do not italicize, underline, or use quotation marks for books and versions of the Bible. Do italicize the titles of individual published editions of the Bible. Example: The King James Version of the Bible was originally published in 1611. Example: The New Oxford Annotated Bible includes maps of the Holy Land. In-Text Citations Abbreviate titles of books. [See section 7.7.1 for lists of abbreviations of Old and New Testament books]. Examples: Gen. 1.1-2 (Phil. 3.8) [parenthetical citation] Note: Use a period to separate chapter and verse. For a first parenthetical citation to a particular version, cite the name, followed by a comma, and then the passage. Examples: (New International Version, Gen. 3.15) (New Jerusalem Bible, Ezek. 2.6-8) For subsequent references, do not identify the version, unless you use a different version. Works Cited (i.e. Bibliography) Include the title of the Bible, the version, and publication information (city, publisher, year), followed by Print or Web designation. Example: Zondervan NIV Study Bible. Fully rev. ed. Kenneth L. Barker, gen. ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002. Print. Example: The English Standard Version Bible: Containing the Old and New Testaments with Apocrypha. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print. Example: New International Version. [Colorado Springs]: Biblica, 2011. BibleGateway.com. Web. 3 Mar. 2011. 2 APA [Refer to Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inclusive-Language Debate: a Plea for Realism I D.A
    "Don Carson has given us a much-needed book that is both provoca­ tive and timely .... He observes that inclusive-language translations are not only inevitable but also necessary, and that current translations that refuse to update themselves gender-inclusively will quite likely end up in the dustbin of history.... I heartily and enthusiastically rec­ ommend Carson's latest effort, and I do so without reservation." Ronald Youngblood THE member of NIV Committee on Bible Translation INCLUSIVE­ "Carson's study of inclusive language is an excellent plea for san­ ity in a discussion that has had its share of hysteria and lack of balance. Bringing the history of translation, exegetical skill, an awareness of LANGUAGE how different languages work, an appreciation of the cultural dimen­ sions of the question, numerous specific examples, and just sheer calm DEBATE to the table, Carson's work deserves a careful reading by all in the debate and a hearty word of thanks from the Christian community." PLEA FOR REALISM A .- -,------,- Darrell L. Bock research professor of New Testament studies, Dallas Theological Seminary "Wise and scholarly, D. A. Carson brings judicious insight to the heated debate regarding inclusive language in Bible translations. This D. A. CARSON profound volume demonstrates the complexity of translation decisions and heightens sensitivity to the task of careful Biblical interpretation." Luder G. Whitlock, Ir. president, Reformed Theological Seminary "Based on masterful linguistic scholarship, this book is a model of fair-minded wisdom on Bible translation." I. 1. Packer professor of theology, Regent College "From a surprising source comes an able defense for inclusive lan­ guage, because of a desire to have integrity in Bible translation." Aida Besan,on Spencer professor of New Testament BakerBooks - Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary A Division of Baker .!:SOaK House \,..;0 IYp Grand Rapids, Michigan 49516 ~ © 1998 by D.
    [Show full text]
  • CHOOSING a BIBLE TRANSLATION Reading, Studying and Praying
    CHOOSING A BIBLE TRANSLATION Reading, studying and praying through the Bible are an essential part of the Christian faith. The Bible teaches us about who God is; the purpose of human life; and how we should live in relation to God, to other people and to the created world. But more than just a source of information, beliefs, and practices, when we read the Bible with faith it becomes one of the key places where we encounter God. Indeed, when we pray for God’s Spirit to bring the ancient words alive, we are promised an encounter with God’s living Word – Jesus himself. All of this makes choosing which Bible translation to use an important decision. The two main things that go into this decision is how faithful it is to the original Hebrew and Greek Biblical manuscripts (so it will communicate what the Bible really says), and whether it’s easy to understand and enjoyable to read (so that you’ll actually want to read it). Picking a good translation means balancing the two – some translations focus on being as literal as possible (word-for-word), while others focus on taking the ideas spoken in the ancient languages and putting them into easily understandable modern English (thought-for-thought). Below I’ve listed four translations which are among the most common ones used today. NRSV (New Revised Standard Version) The NRSV is a mainly word- for-word translation of the Bible that is the most commonly used translation in university level Biblical studies. One of its distinctive features are the fact that it was translated by a group of scholars that included Protestant, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christians, which makes it largely free of bias towards any one Christian tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Accurate Bible Version for Old Testament
    Most Accurate Bible Version For Old Testament Cosmoramic and dark Tymon impregnating her Wednesday betroths slumberously or set pantomimically, is Giorgi nihilist? Etiolate and Galwegian Madison scribblings her amie outstruck first-rate or cantons evanescently, is Vick choky? Unfilled and inelaborate Christy prostrates so quaveringly that Hendrik municipalises his Democritus. Although few monks in any of our greatest enemy to convey ideas and accurate version for any other It is white known to historians that gap was a common practice because that destiny for anonymously written books to be ascribed to famous people cannot give birth more authority. And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. King james version for most accurate and old testament into modern scholars! To assess their fidelity and accuracy of the Bible today compared to look original texts one must refuse the issues of translation theory and the though of the English Bible. The New Testament to ball if the verses match the meaning of rural King James. Stanley Horton being the head Theologian. How much on a very awkward literalistic translation by academic world for warren as old bible version for most accurate and to conform your comment. Whenever anyone in the New Testament was addressed from heaven, it was always in the Hebrew tongue. At times one might have wished that they had kept more of the King James text than they did, but the text is more easily understandable than the unrevised King James text would have otherwise been. The matter World Translation employs nearly 16000 English expressions to translate about 5500 biblical Greek terms and over 27000 English expressions to translate about 500 Hebrew terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Sample
    Growing in God’s Love A Story Bible Curriculum Unit Overview and Connecting page written by Elizabeth F. Caldwell Sessions written by Lynne Pabst Listening for God Introduction 2 Unit Overview 3 Intergenerational and Home Ideas 4 The Most Important 19 God’s Big Plan 7 Thing to Remember Genesis 11:1–9 Deuteronomy 6:4–9 God Gives the Ten 13 Commandments Exodus 20:1–21 The free At-Home Kit Guide provides instructions and suggestions for at-home faith formation. Download it at www.pcusastore.com/StoryBibleCurriculum or www.thethoughtfulchristian.com/StoryBibleCurriculum. Click on the unit title, and then click on the download button found at the bottom of the product page for this unit. © 2021 Westminster John Knox Press Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, © 1989 by the First edition Division of Christian Education of the National Council of Published by Westminster John Knox Press Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., and are used by permission. Louisville, Kentucky In some instances, adaptations have been made to make the All rights reserved. Except where permission to photocopy is language inclusive. expressly granted on the material, no part of these materials Every effort has been made to determine whether texts are under may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, copyright. If through an oversight any copyrighted material has electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, been used without permission and the publisher is notified of or by any information storage or retrieval system, without this, acknowledgment will be made in future printings.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Bible
    STUDYING THE BIBLE Prepared by the Reverend Brent Anderson WHAT IS THE BIBLE? The word “Bible” is derived from a plural Greek word, into covenant relation with the God of justice and ta biblia, “the little scrolls” or “the books”. While steadfast love and to bring God’s way and blessings to many think of the Bible as a single book, it is actually a the nations. The New Testament is considerably short- collection of books—a collection of many diverse er than the Old Testament. It consists of twenty-seven writings from our ancestors in the faith who tell the books written entirely in Greek. It records the life, story of God and God’s love. Like an ancestral scrap- work and significance of Jesus Christ (including the book, the Bible is the witness of God’s people of God’s practical and ethical implications of following him) and commitment to Israel—and through Israel to the it describes the spread of the early Christian church as world—and God’s decisive activity on behalf of the well as a vision of God’s ultimate desires for God’s world through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus people and creation. Christ. It is a book that gathers the testimonies and THE PURPOSE OF BIBLE STUDY confessions of the ancient Israelites and early Chris- Our goal in studying the Bible is not primarily to learn tians regarding the nature and will of God—revealing information—to learn the history or story of God’s who God is and what God is like.
    [Show full text]
  • The Message Bible”
    “THE MESSAGE BIBLE”: PERVERSION OF GOD’S HOLY WORD “. but when your eye is evil, your body also is full of darkness. Take heed therefore that the light which is in you be not darkness” (Lk. 11:34-35). It is impossible to separate Jesus the Living Word from Jesus the Written Word. Therefore, one can easily see why Jesus, the Light of the World, cannot be portrayed with a false light, a false Bible. You will, in effect, be presenting “another Jesus,” “another spirit,” and “another Gospel” (II Cor.11:4). “The Message Bible” is just such a false light. It is actually not a Bible. It is a message from the enemy specially crafted to filter through a veil of Scripture so as to “deceive even the elect” (Mk. 13:22). Supposedly, The Message is harmless, just another translation in contemporary style, but one quick look should show anyone that it is a questionable paraphrase at best. However, even this is a stretch because The Message contains consistent error, which constantly misses the heart of what the Holy Spirit intended to express. It is nowhere close to a true word-for-word translation of the original Greek and Hebrew text. To put it another way, its author is not the Holy Spirit at all, but a man named Eugene Peterson. And, as if this weren’t sinful enough, The Message also delves into the occult. The phraseology used in The Message demonstrates thorough knowledge of esoteric and New Age philosophy. Peterson himself is a proponent of contemplative/mystical spirituality as evidenced in his writings and endorsements of other contemplative authors, not to mention their endorsements of his work.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download CEB Common English Bible New Testament
    CEB COMMON ENGLISH BIBLE NEW TESTAMENT SOFTCOVER 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Abingdon Press | 9781609260064 | | | | | CEB Common English Bible New Testament Softcover 1st edition PDF Book The hardest problems in biblical translation aren't about the English, they're about the Greek or the Hebrew, according to one Episcopalian involved in production of the new Common English Bible. The translators and editors that worked on the Bible are from various denominations and locations around the world. Seller Inventory VIB Additionally, more than readers in 77 groups field-tested the translation. The digital revolution is accelerating changes in language and its everyday usage. More information about this seller Contact this seller. You know, a Bible with a few fun illustrations and activities. Brosend said the new translation is "companion translation. Seller Inventory zk As the translators did their work, reading specialists working with seventy-seven reading groups from more than a dozen denominations review the texts to ensure a smooth and natural reading experience. We'll send you an email with steps on how to reset your password. There will always be new facts to discover and ideas to think about. When quotations from the CEB text are used in non-salable media such as church bulletins, orders of service, posters, transparencies or similar media, a complete copyright notice is not required, but the initials CEB must appear at the end of each quotation. Published by Common English Bible In Stock. New Quantity Available: 1. William F. Highlight or Bookmark your favorite verses, make Verse Images that you can share, and attach public or private Notes to Bible passages.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Early Biblical Translations
    * * * * * * * Three Early Biblical Translations We do not have any of the original manuscripts of the books that have been included in the Bible. All we have is copies of copies. Most of the original manuscripts of the Old Testament were written in Hebrew, although a few chapters of Ezra and Daniel were recorded in Aramaic, the language of Jesus. The books of the New Testament were first written in Greek. The first translations of the Bible were of the Hebrew Bible. The Septuagint (SEP-too-a-jint) was a Greek translation written about three centuries before the birth of Christ. Two other early translations, composed after the birth of Christ, were the Peshitta in Syriac and the Vulgate in Latin. These three translations, the Septuagint, Peshitta, and Vulgate became the official translations of the Old Testament for the Greek-, Syriac-, and Latin-speaking churches respectively. Each also became the basis for other translations of the Bible. The Septuagint The Septuagint (from the Latin word septuaginta meaning seventy) was a Greek version of the Bible created during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (ca. 285-246 BCE) in Alexandria, Egypt for Diaspora Jews. Most of Jews living outside of Palestine were Greek-speaking as a result of Alexander the Great's (357-323 BCE) campaign to Hellenize his empire. First verses of Genesis (click for larger picture) At first, the Septuagint (LXX) consisted only of the Pentateuch (Torah, first five books of the Bible). Different books were translated from the Hebrew over a span of two centuries, including the books of the Apocrypha, and were added to the LXX.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite the Bible
    How to Cite the Bible APA Style Parenthetical Citations: • For your first citation, identify the version which you used. Example: (John 3:16 New Revised Standard Version) • As part of a sentence: Example: In a sentence: In Psalm 36:1 (New Jerusalem Bible), David... • After this, only include the scripture reference, unless you switch versions. Reference Page: • Well-known books such as the Bible do not need to be included on the reference page, unless a professor requires you to do so. Information taken from Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , 6th ed., 2009, section 6.18. MLA Style General Guidelines: • Versions of the Bible or individual books are not underlined, italicized, or placed in quotation marks. However, underline or italicize individual published editions of the Bible. Example: The King James Version of the Bible was first published in 1611. Example: The New Oxford Annotated Bible includes maps of the Holy Land. • You do not need to identify the version in subsequent references unless you switch to a different version. Parenthetical References: • Books of the Bible are abbreviated; see the MLA Handbook for common abbreviations. Example: (Phil. 3.8) • A period, not a colon, separates chapter and verse. • When you first refer to a particular version, include the name, a comma, and then the passage. Examples: (New Revised Standard Version, John 3.16) (New Jerusalem Bible , Ezek. 2.6-8) • After this, only include the scripture reference, unless you switch versions. Murray Library Messiah College – Box 3002 Grantham, Pa 17027 (717) 691-6006 www.messiah.edu/murraylibrary Guide #13: 6/30/2011 (BLM) Works Cited: • Include the title of the Bible, the version, the publication information, and whether it is print or web, in the citation.
    [Show full text]