DOCSLIB.ORG

Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S A GENERATIONtodayAHEAD, 2009 ANNUAL REPORT A GENERATIONtodayAHEAD, With America embarking on a journey to a future of clean power, Calpine’s power generation portfolio contains the critical pieces needed to help solve the nation’s energy policy puzzle. One of the most important policy challenges is to assure the right array of power generation resources. Most renewable resources, other than geothermal, are intermittent, presenting reliability challenges. Potential technological solutions are not assured and, in any event, may be many years off. Our geothermal plants at The Geysers are the ideal renewable resource, providing power every minute of every day. Our modern, clean and efficient natural gas plants provide the grid with the flexibility and reliability that allow for the integration of intermittent renewable power, provide American industry with highly efficient steam and power to keep jobs here, and, due to the underulitization of natural gas generation in many regions, provide an existing and immediately viable alternative to burning coal, while emitting less than half the carbon dioxide, a fraction of the sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide, and no mercury, among other site advantages. We are generating solutions for the future, today. Geothermal Generation Calpine owns and operates the nation’s largest baseload renewable energy fleet, consisting of 15 geothermal plants known as Calpine’s Geysers. Calpine’s 121 industrial gas turbines Calpine’s fleet of 22 cogeneration plants, comprise the nation’s largest fleet converting the nation’s largest, provide industrial clean-burning natural gas into electricity. Gas-Fired Generation customers with thermal energy and power. GENERATING SOLUTIONS for our Shareholders FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: uring 2009, amidst challenging macroeconomic conditions Dand uneven capital markets, Calpine, through a combination of conservative risk management and sound operational, commercial and financial execution, managed to improve financial performance. (Front row) Jack Fusco, CEO. (Back row, left to right) Thad Miller, CLO, Thad Hill, CCO, and Zamir Rauf, CFO. We held Commodity Margin steady, reduced expenses, increased Adjusted EBITDA by 5%, and improved Adjusted Free Cash Flow to help maintain strong liquidity, to service our debt, to meet our collateral needs and to fund operations and disciplined growth1. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS: ($ MILLIONS) Adjusted Ebitda Adjusted Free Cash Flow Net Income Liquidity 1,782 609 149 2,379 1,699 2,178 495 10 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 National Portfolio of nearly 25,000 MW North Region: 3,417 MW 2009 Adj. EBITDA: $220M Southeast Region: 6,083 MW 2009 Adj. EBITDA: $188M West Region: 7,846 MW 2009 Adj. EBITDA: $959M In Operation - Gas-Fired (61) In Operation - Geothermal (15) Texas Region: Under Advanced Development (2) 1 Map does not include Consolidation and 7,392 MW Elimination Adjusted EBITDA of $(15)M. 2009 Adj. EBITDA: $430M 1 Commodity Margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Liquidity, as referenced within this document, are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to the Investor Relations section of our website for reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures. 1 Calpine 2009 Annual Report DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS, hen I wrote to you a year ago, my first year at the Whelm of Calpine, I recognized that in 2009 we would be challenged as an organization and yet was confident we would rise to the occasion. I am pleased and proud to report that we have exceeded my expectations and surpassed our goals. Our share price improved 51% during the year, and our operating, commer- cial and financial performance metrics demonstrated true progress toward becoming the leading independent power producer in the nation. We were able to do so because our employees remained focused and executed on our mission. They are to be com- mended. This year will be challenging as well. We will remain focused on operating excellence, innovative but conservative commercial execution, environmental leadership and customer • We maintained our top-quartile safety performance for satisfaction, while continuing to deliver shareholder value. the seventh consecutive year with four plants having earned certification as OSHA Star VPP sites, one of the highest 2009: MEETING THE CHALLENGE safety recognitions available in the industry. My goal for Calpine is to be the premier power plant operator • Across the fleet, we had an astonishing 2.03% forced in the industry. Our ability to efficiently and reliably generate outage factor, a reduction of 38% from 2008. power, coupled with the effective implementation of our hedging strategy, enabled us to deliver exceptional results, despite a 2009 COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS national power demand decline of approximately 4%. We main- We refocused our efforts on customer origination, with an empha- tained Commodity Margin level to 2008, despite a 56% decline sis on listening to our customers’ needs and creating solutions for in average natural gas prices and similar reduction in wholesale them. As a result, we signed multiple new contracts, including: electric prices in markets in which we participate. We realized • A series of contracts with Pacific Gas & Electric for inter- over $60 million of sustainable savings in controllable expenses, mediate and peaking generation, as well as baseload renewable reflecting, among other things, the results of our realignment and geothermal generation from our Geysers to help meet their business improvement efforts over the course of the year. As a renewable portfolio standards obligations. consequence, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow • An innovative agreement with Los Angeles Department improved by 5% and 23%, respectively. Importantly, we are of Water and Power to integrate procured renewable wind holding ourselves accountable for maintaining these savings over generation with our quick-responding natural gas-fired the long term. We are not simply “short-term cost cutting” our generation to provide a firm power supply. way through tough economic times. • In the challenging Southeast market, we entered into agreements with the TVA and Entergy. These financial results demonstrate the culmination of many accomplishments. Here are a few: 2009 CORPORATE INITIATIVES • We made significant progress toward improving our balance 2009 POWER OPERATIONS sheet and corporate structure, refinanced approximately $3 billion • Our Otay Mesa Energy Center, an air-cooled combined-cycle of debt and improved our capital flexibility for the future by issuing gas turbine plant, commenced operations in October 2009 new bonds with favorable covenants. We also eliminated near- under a ten-year power purchase agreement with San Diego term maturities, extended our debt maturity profile and improved Gas & Electric. our liquidity, which approached $2.4 billion as of year-end. 2 Calpine 2009 Annual Report • We initiated organizational efficiency improvements that By focusing on these initiatives, I believe we will solidify a have resulted in tangible, sustainable benefits. We consolidated foundation of growth for Calpine and we will also better prepare office locations and administrative functions and additionally, ourselves for economic recovery when it does appear. Calpine is centralized our procurement processes, generating meaningful uniquely well positioned to benefit from both price and volume cost savings. Finally, we completed the implementation of expansion when electric markets rebound, as we have the ability an enterprise business system, meaningfully enhancing our to increase our plant output at the same time that power prices accounting and financial reporting. improve with minimal additional capital investment. 2010: CONTROLLING OUR DESTINY A FINAL WORD: HELPING CUSTOMERS Be assured, we will not rest on the laurels AND THE ENVIRONMENT of 2009. Instead, we have prepared We operate in an industry that is in a state of Calpine to weather what appears to be meaningful transition and within an economy an equally daunting 2010. Although that is likewise evolving. I remain convinced some signs of economy-wide stabilization that Calpine is uniquely positioned to embrace have appeared, the climb to a robust and profit from the changes afoot. In a future recovery will be long and hard fought, that calls for more sources of cleaner power, and natural gas and power prices likely Calpine stands out as a leader among its peers: will remain muted. This is why we have we operate the largest fleet of renewable baseload substantially hedged Commodity Margin generation in the country, we operate a natural-gas for 2010, effectively removing gas price fleet that is meaningfully cleaner than other fossil volatility from the portfolio. In addition, fuels and able to provide baseload, intermediate we are forging ahead to identify and and peaking supply, and finally, with renewable execute on new commercial opportuni- Otay Mesa Energy Center, San Diego, CA energy mandates in place or on the horizon, our ties, continuing our efforts to deliver customers will need natural gas-fired generation best-in-class plant performance to maximize the efficiency and to integrate renewable resources into the grid to maintain availability of our existing fleet, and building and strengthening reliability. In short, Calpine is a generation ahead, today. customer relationships to identify solutions that deliver long-term value for both our customers and our organization. I encourage you to share in our future as we continue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Board-Approved 2013-2014 Transmission Plan
    2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Center 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S
    10-K 1 cpn_10kx12312014.htm CALPINE 10-K FOR YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF [X] 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT [ ] OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-12079 ______________________ Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 77-0212977 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 830-2000 Not Applicable (Former Address) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Calpine Corporation Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A: System Data
    2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Cener 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Comments on The
    CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2018-2019 Study Plan
    2018-2019 Transmission Planning Process Unified Planning Assumptions and Study Plan March 30, 2018 Final ISO Market and Infrastructure Development Division March 30, 2018 Intentionally left blank Study Plan 2018-2019 Transmission Planning Process Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Overview of 2018-2019 Stakeholder Process Activities and Communications .. 2 2.1 Stakeholder Meetings and Market Notices ....................................... 2 2.3 Interregional Coordination ................................................................ 5 2.4 Stakeholder Comments .................................................................... 5 2.5 Availability of Information .................................................................. 5 3 Reliability Assessments ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 Reliability Standards and Criteria ..................................................... 7 3.1.1 NERC Reliability Standards ........................................................ 7 3.1.2 WECC Regional Criteria ............................................................. 8 3.1.3 California ISO Planning Standards ............................................. 8 3.2 Frequency of the study ..................................................................... 8 3.3 Study Horizon and Years .................................................................. 8 3.4 Study Areas .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C to California’S Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations
    Appendix C to California’s Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations Prime Nameplate Generator mover Capacity Summer ARB Updated List EPA Original Plant Name Operator Name ORIS Code ID Fuel type type (MW) Capacity (MW) EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Rollins Nevada Irrigation District 34 1P WAT HY 12.1 12.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Venice Metropolitan Water District 72 1 WAT HY 10.1 10.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE J S Eastwood Southern California Edison Co 104 1 WAT PS 199.8 199.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 1 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 2 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 1 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 2 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 3 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 1 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 2 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Volta 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 180 1 WAT HY 1.0 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 1 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 2 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Angels Utica Power Authority 215 1 WAT HY 1.4 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 217 1 WAT HY 31.0 31.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 2 WAT HY 48.6 52.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 3 WAT HY 48.6 55.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 13
    ATTACHMENT 13 Project List PROJECT NAME CEC DOCKET# PROJECT OWNER* ALMOND 2 POWER PLANT 09-AFC-2C Turlock Irrigation District ALAMITOS ENERGY CENTER 13-AFC-01C AES ALLIANCE CENTURY ENERGY 01-EP-04C FACILITY Clarion Energy West, LLC ALLIANCE DREWS ENERGY 01-EP-05C FACILITY Clarion Energy West, LLC ALMOND II POWER PLANT 09-AFC-02C Turlock Irrigation District BLYTHE ENERGY PROJECT 99-AFC-08C AltaGas/Blythe Energy Inc BLYTHE ENERGY / 99-AFC-08C TRANSMISSION LINE AltaGas/Blythe Energy Inc BLYTHE SOLAR POWER 09-AFC-06C NextEra Energy Resources PROJECT BORDER PROJECT 01-EP-14C CalPeak Power-Border, LLC BOTTLE ROCK GEOTHERMAL 79-AFC-4C AltaRock Energy CALISTOGA GEYSER 81-AFC-1C Calpine Corporation CAMPBELL COGENERATION 93-AFC-3C SPA SMUD So California Public Power CANYON POWER PLANT 07-AFC-9C Authority CARLSBAD ENERGY CENTER 07-AFC-6C Carlsbad Energy Center LLC COLUSA GENERATING 06-AFC-9C STATION PG&E COSUMNES POWER PLANT 01-AFC-19C SMUD *The Energy Commission compiled the list of project owners based on the application for c Energy Commission. This list may be incomplete. Project Owner includes the business en certification or petition to amend, all of its parent companies and subsidiaries, and investo ownership interest. The Applicant is responsible for listing all Project Owners that meet the listed on this Attachment 15. CPV SENTINEL ENERGY 07/AFC-3C PROJECT Attachment 13 CPV Sentinel, LLC RFQ-19-703 Page 1 of 12 On Call DCBO ATTACHMENT 13 Project List PROJECT NAME CEC DOCKET# PROJECT OWNER* CROCKETT COGENERATION 92-AFC-1C Crocket Cogeneration
    [Show full text]
  • Lorrie Lele Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916
    Comment Letter O12 From: Lorrie J. LeLe To: Harris, Susan Cc: Kyle C. Jones Subject: Comments on Draft EIR - Boulder Brush Facilities (4646) Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 4:07:30 PM Attachments: 4646-013j - ABJC DEIR Comment to SD County.pdf Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy and Doyle Mills on the Boulder Brush Facilities Draft Environmental Impact Report. The original will be mailed, along with a flash drive containing the expert Scott Cashen’s cite O12-1 references. If you have any questions, please contact Kyle Jones directly. Thank you, Lorrie LeLe Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916. 444.6201 Ext. 10 | Fax: 916.444.6209 | __________________________________ This e-mail may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the send and delete all copies. ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO DANIEL L. CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE CHRISTINA M. CARO ATTORNEYS AT LAW 601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000 SARA F. DUDLEY SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 THOMAS A. ENSLOW 520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350 ANDREW J. GRAF TEL: (650) 589- 1660 TANYA A. GULESSERIAN SACRAMENTO, CA 95814- 4721 ___________ FAX: (650) 589- 5062 KENDRA D. HARTMANN* KYLE C. JONES TEL: (916) 444- 6201 RACHAEL E. KOSS FAX: (916) 444- 6209 NIRIT LOTAN AARON M.
    [Show full text]
  • California ISO Planning Standards
    FILED 03/27/19 04:59 PM A1903026 California ISO Planning Standards June 23, 2011 1 1 / 226 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. ISO Planning Standards 1. Applicability of NERC Reliability Standards to Low Voltage Facilities under ISO Operational Control 2. Combined Line and Generator Outage Standard 3. Voltage Standard 4. Specific Nuclear Unit Standards 5. Loss of Combined Cycle Power Plant Module as a Single Generator Outage 6. Planning for New Transmission versus Involuntary Load Interruption Standard III. ISO Planning Guidelines 1. New Special Protection Systems IV. Combined Line and Generator Unit Outage Standards Supporting Information V. Loss of Combined Cycle Power Plant Module as a Single Generator Outage Standard Supporting Information VI. Background behind Planning for New Transmission versus Involuntary Load Interruption Standard VII. Interpretations of Terms from the NERC Reliability Standards and WECC Regional Criteria 2 2 / 226 I. Introduction The California ISO (ISO) tariff provides for the establishment of planning guidelines and standards above those established by NERC and WECC to ensure the secure and reliable operation of the ISO controlled grid. The primary guiding principle of these Planning Standards is to develop consistent reliability standards for the ISO grid that will maintain or improve transmission system reliability to a level appropriate for the California system. These ISO Planning Standards are not intended to duplicate the NERC and WECC reliability standards, but to complement them where it is in the best interests of the security and reliability of the ISO controlled grid. The ISO planning standards will be revised from time to time to ensure they are consistent with the current state of the electrical industry and in conformance with NERC Reliability Standards and WECC Regional Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a to California's Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power
    Appendix A to California’s Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: List of Affected EGUs Plant Name Operator Name ORIS Code Generator ID Fuel Prime Nameplate Electric Carbon Dioxide Unit type mover Capacity Generation Emissions (tons) Retirement type (MW) (MWh) Year Contra Costa Mirant Delta LLC 228 6 NG ST 359 13795 12126.85 2013 Contra Costa Mirant Delta LLC 228 7 NG ST 359 117575 83710.45 2013 Dynegy Morro Bay LLC Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC 259 1 NG ST 169.1 0 0 Dynegy Morro Bay LLC Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC 259 2 NG ST 169.1 0 0 Dynegy Morro Bay LLC Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC 259 3 NG ST 359 116435 72510.85 Dynegy Morro Bay LLC Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC 259 4 NG ST 359 88502 55112.89 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 6 NG ST 702 310390 189711.38 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 7 NG ST 702 278403 172001.76 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 CT1A NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 CT1B NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 CT2A NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 CT2B NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 ST1 NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC 260 ST2 NG CC 233 738803.67 319463.08 Pittsburg Power Mirant Delta LLC 271 5 NG ST 326.4 106698 78335.3
    [Show full text]