DOCSLIB.ORG

Lorrie Lele Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lorrie Lele Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ljlele@Adamsbroadwell.Com | Phone: 916 Comment Letter O12 From: Lorrie J. LeLe To: Harris, Susan Cc: Kyle C. Jones Subject: Comments on Draft EIR - Boulder Brush Facilities (4646) Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 4:07:30 PM Attachments: 4646-013j - ABJC DEIR Comment to SD County.pdf Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy and Doyle Mills on the Boulder Brush Facilities Draft Environmental Impact Report. The original will be mailed, along with a flash drive containing the expert Scott Cashen’s cite O12-1 references. If you have any questions, please contact Kyle Jones directly. Thank you, Lorrie LeLe Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916. 444.6201 Ext. 10 | Fax: 916.444.6209 | __________________________________ This e-mail may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the send and delete all copies. ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO DANIEL L. CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE CHRISTINA M. CARO ATTORNEYS AT LAW 601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000 SARA F. DUDLEY SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 THOMAS A. ENSLOW 520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350 ANDREW J. GRAF TEL: (650) 589- 1660 TANYA A. GULESSERIAN SACRAMENTO, CA 95814- 4721 ___________ FAX: (650) 589- 5062 KENDRA D. HARTMANN* KYLE C. JONES TEL: (916) 444- 6201 RACHAEL E. KOSS FAX: (916) 444- 6209 NIRIT LOTAN AARON M. MESSING [email protected] WILLIAM C. MUMBY CAMILLE G. STOUGH February 03, 2020 MARC D. JOSEPH Of Counsel *Admitted in Colorado Via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail Susan Harris Planning and Development Services County of San Diego 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92123 Email: [email protected] Re: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Boulder Brush Facilities (SCH No. 2019029094, PDS2019-ER-19- 16-001, PDS 2019-MUP-19-002) Dear Ms. Harris: We are writing on behalf of Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy and Doyle Mills to provide comments on the December 12, 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) prepared by DUDEK for the County of San Diego (“County”), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”),1 for the Boulder O12-2 Brush Facilities, which include a lease agreement between the Campo Band of Diegueño and Terra-Gen Development Company LLC (“Campo Lease”) for the Campo Wind Project (“Project”).2 The DEIR incorporates by reference a May 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“DEIS”) prepared by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. (“NEPA”). 1 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. 2 County of San Diego, Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Campo Wind Project with Boulder Brush Facilities, (December 2019), (hereafter “DEIR”). 4646-013j printed on recycled paper February 3, 2020 Page 2 The Project includes a lease allowing Terra-Gen to develop, construct, operate and ultimately decommission a renewable energy generation facility on land within the boundary of the Campo Indian Reservation in Eastern San Diego County, California. The Campo Wind Project consists of both the Campo Wind Facilities on land within the Reservation and the Boulder Brush Facilities on adjacent private lands within the Boulder Brush Boundary. The Project includes up to 60 wind turbines, each approximately 4.2 megawatts in capacity and approximately 586 feet O12-3 in total height, access roads, electrical collection and communication system, project collector substation, operations and maintenance facility, meteorological towers, water collection and septic system, temporary concrete batch plant, temporary staging areas, on-reservation portion of the generation tie line (“gen-tie line”), and boulder brush facilities, which include a portion of the gen-tie line, a high-voltage substation, a switchyard, and access roads). As explained in these comments, the DEIR fails to comply with CEQA’s basic requirement to act as an “informational document.” It is devoid of meaningful details upon which the public and decisionmakers can adequately assess the Project’s significant impacts. The DEIR fails to comply with the requirements of CEQA by (1) failing to include a complete project description (2) piecemealing the Campo Wind Project from the Torrey Wind Project, (3) failing to accurately describe O12-4 the affected environment, (4) not disclosing, analyzing, or discussing mitigation for the Project’s significant impacts, and (5) impermissibly deferring identification of mitigation for the Project’s significant impacts. Because of these shortcomings, the DEIR is deficient as a matter of law and its determinations that it properly identifies and mitigates the Project’s significant impacts are not supported by substantial evidence. For each of these reasons, the County may not approve the Project until a revised environmental review document is prepared and re-circulated for public O12-5 review and comment. 4646-013j February 3 020 Page 3 e revieed the IR its technical appendices and the reference documents ith the assistance of biologist cott ashen.4 Mr. ashen provides substantial evidence of potentially significant effects that have not been adequately disclosed, analyzed, or mitigated. Mr. Cashen’s technical comments are attached O12-6 hereto and are hereby submitted to the ount in addition to the comments in this letter. The ount must respond to these consultants’ comments separately and individuall.5 I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST itiens for esponsible ind nergy is an unincorporated association of individuals and labor organiations ith members ho may be adversel affected by the potential public and orer health and safet haards and environmental and public service impacts of the Project. he association includes an iego County residents and California Unions for Reliable Energy (“CURE”) and its members and families and other individuals that live recreate andor or in an iego County (collectively “Citizens”). Citiens supports the development of clean reneable energy technology including the use of ind poer generation here properly analyed and carefully O12-7 planned to minimie impacts on public health and the environment. ind energy projects should avoid impacts to sensitive species and habitats ater resources and public health and should tae all feasible steps to ensure unavoidable impacts are mitigated to the maximum etent feasible. nly by maintaining the highest standards can energy supply development truly be sustainable. The individual members of itiens including ole ills and the members of the affiliated labor organiations live or recreate and raise their families in an iego ount. The ould be directly affected by the Project’s environmental and health and safet impacts. Individual members may also or constructing the Project itself. The will be first in line to be eposed to an health and safet haards that may be present on the Project site. hey each have a personal interest 4 cott Cashen, Letter from cott ashen to yle . ones omments on the raft nvironmental Impact eport for the ampo ind Project ith oulder rush acilities Januar 02 (hereafter “Cashen Comments”) Exhibit B Materials cited ill be provided on a separate storage device in the mailing of these comments. 5 Appalachian Mountain Club v. Brinegar 394 .Supp. 05 D... 197. 4646-j February 3, 020 age 4 in protecting the roect area from unnecessary, adverse environmental and public health impacts. The organizational members of Citizens and their members also have an interest in enforcing environmental las that encourage sustainable development and ensure a safe oring environment for the members that they represent. Environmentally detrimental proects can eopardize future obs by making it more difficult and more epensive for industry to epand in the County, and by maing it less desirable for businesses to locate and people to live and recreate in the County, O12-7 including the Proect vicinity. Continued degradation can, and has, caused Cont. construction moratoriums and other restrictions on groth that, in turn, reduces future employment opportunities. Finally, the organizational members of Citizens are concerned ith proects that can result in serious environmental harm ithout providing countervailing economic benefits. CE provides a balancing process hereby economic benefits are eighed against significant impacts to the environment. t is in this spirit e offer these comments. II. LEGAL BACKGROUND CE reuires that an agency analyze the potential environmental impacts of its proposed actions in an environmental impact report (“EIR”) (except in certain limited circumstances).6 The ER is the very heart of CE.7 “The foremost principle in interpreting CE is that the Legislature intended the act to be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment ithin the reasonable scope of the statutory language.”8 O12-8 CE has to primary purposes, none of hich is fulfilled by the ER. First, CE is designed to inform decision maers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a proect.9 “Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental conseuences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR “protects not only the environment 6 See, e.g., ub. Resources Code § 10. 7 Dunn-Edwards v. BAAQMD
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 Regional Plan Social Equity Working Group Agenda
    2021 Regional Plan Social Equity Working Group Agenda Thursday, August 5, 2021 10 a.m. **Teleconference Meeting** MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT AMIDST COVID-19 PANDEMIC: The 2021 Regional Plan Social Equity Working Group meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 5, 2021, will be conducted virtually in accordance with Governor Newsom’s State of Emergency declaration regarding the COVID-19 outbreak, Executive Order N-29-20, and the Guidance for Gatherings issued by the California Department of Public Health. Group members will primarily participate in the meeting virtually, while practicing social distancing, from individual remote locations. To participate via Zoom webinar, click the link to join the meeting: https://zoom.us/j/98162623531 Webinar ID: 981 6262 3531 To participate via Telephone, dial a number based on your current location in the US: +1 (669) 900-6833 +1 (253) 215-8782 +1 (346) 248-7799 +1 (312) 626-6799 +1 (929) 205-6099 +1 (301) 715-8592 International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/adK6YOiK5L SANDAG relies on commercial technology to broadcast the meeting via Zoom. With the increase of virtual meetings, platforms such as Microsoft Teams, WebEx, GoToMeeting, and Zoom are working to scale their systems to meet the new demand. If we experience technical difficulty or you are unexpectedly disconnected from the broadcast, please close and reopen your browser and click the link to rejoin the meeting. SANDAG staff will take all possible measures to ensure a publicly accessible experience. Public Comments: Persons who wish to address the members on an item to be considered at this meeting, or on non- agendized issues, may email comments to the Clerk at [email protected] (please reference “Thursday, August 5, Social Equity Working Group Meeting,” in your subject line and identify the item number(s) to which your comments pertain).
    [Show full text]
  • Board-Approved 2013-2014 Transmission Plan
    2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Center 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Nomination of the Ben and Ruth Rubin House, San Diego, California for the City of San Diego, Historical Resources Board, by Ronald V
    Historic Nomination Report of the Ben and Ruth Rubin House 4480 Trias Street Mission Hills Community ~ San Diego, California Ronald V. May, RPA Kiley Wallace Legacy 106, Inc. P.O. Box 15967 San Diego, CA 92175 (858) 459-0326 (760) 704-7373 www.legacy106.com August 2018 Revised February 2019 1 HISTORIC HOUSE RESEARCH Ronald V. May, RPA, President and Principal Investigator Kiley Wallace, Vice President and Architectural Historian P.O. Box 15967 • San Diego, CA 92175 Phone (858) 459-0326 • (760) 704-7373 http://www.legacy106.com 2 3 State of California – The Resources Agency Primary # ___________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ______________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial __________________________________ NRHP Status Code 3S Other Listings ___________________________________________________________ Review Code _____ Reviewer ____________________________ Date __________ Page 3 of 33 *Resource Name or #: The Ben and Ruth Rubin House P1. Other Identifier: 4480 Trias Street, San Diego, CA 92103 *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: San Diego and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: La Jolla Date: 2015 T ; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. *c. Address: 4480 Trias Street City: San Diego Zip: 92103 d. UTM: Zone: 11 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.) *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc.) Elevation: 223 feet Legal Description: Lot Three in Block Five Hundred Twenty-six of Old San Diego, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California according to Map by James Pascoe in 1870, on file in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Environmental Injustice
    Moore, Danielle 2020 Environmental Studies Thesis Title: America’s Finest City? : Examining Environmental Injustice in San Diego, CA Advisor: Pia Kohler Advisor is Co-author/Adviser Restricted Data Used: None of the above Second Advisor: Release: release now Authenticated User Access (does not apply to released theses): Contains Copyrighted Material: No America’s Finest City?: Examining Environmental Injustice in San Diego, CA by Danielle Moore Pia M. Kohler, Advisor A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Environmental Studies WILLIAMS COLLEGE Williamstown, Massachusetts May 31, 2020 Moore 1 Acknowledgements First off, I want to give my sincere gratitude to Professor Pia Kohler for her help throughout this whole process. Thank you for giving me constant guidance and support over this time despite all this year’s unique circumstances. I truly appreciate all the invaluable time and assistance you have given me. I also want to thank my second reader Professor Nick Howe for his advice and perspective that made my thesis stronger. Thank you to other members of the Environmental Studies Department that inquired about my thesis and progress throughout the year. I truly appreciate everyone’s encouragement and words of wisdom. Besides the Environmental Studies Department, thank you to all my family members who have supported me during my journey at Williams and beyond. All of you are aware of the challenges that I faced, and I would have not been able to overcome them without your unlimited support. Thank you to all my friends at Williams and at home that have supported me as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S
    10-K 1 cpn_10kx12312014.htm CALPINE 10-K FOR YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF [X] 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT [ ] OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-12079 ______________________ Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 77-0212977 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 830-2000 Not Applicable (Former Address) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Calpine Corporation Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Historic Preservation
    9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Historic preservation plays an important role in maintaining the community’s character and identity, and enhancing the quality of the built environment to ensure the community is an attractive and desirable place for residents and visitors. The Historic Preservation Element focuses on the protection of the historical and cultural resources in the Encanto Neighborhoods, and it supports educational opportunities and incentives to highlight, maintain, and preserve historic resources. City of San Diego Encanto Neighborhoods Community Plan January 2015 GOALS 1. Preservation of significant historical resources. 2. Educational opportunities and incentives to highlight, maintain, and preserve historic resources. TABLE 9-1: HISTORIC PRESERVATION TOPICS ALSO COVERED IN OTHER PLAN ELEMENTS ILITY B AN DESIGN B HISTORIC PRESERVATION TOPIC AREAS LAND USE UR ECONOMIC PROSPERITY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINA ARTS AND CULTURE Identification of historical and cultural X X resources Preservation of historical and cultural X X X X X resources Many aspects of the Plan overlap with the Historic 9.1 Identification and Preservation Preservation Element. For example, Historic Preserva- of Historical Resources tion is closely correlated with the Land Use, Economic Prosperity, and Arts and Culture elements. Table 9-1 The Encanto Neighborhoods have rich historical re- shows some of the issues that may be covered in more sources representing human settlements that date hun- than one element in the Plan, including Conservation dreds of years into the past. The history of its people and Sustainability and Urban Design. and its physical form are closely connected, as docu- mented in the historical and cultural resource technical studies prepared for this Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A: System Data
    2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Cener 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Comments on The
    CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Kearny Mesa Historic Context Statement
    Kearny Mesa Community Planning Area Historic Context Statement FINAL DRAFT March 2019 Prepared for: City of San Diego Planning Department 9485 Aero Drive San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared by: IS Architecture 5645 La Jolla Boulevard La Jolla, CA 92037 for HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 Kearny Mesa Community Planning Area Historic Context Statement FINAL DRAFT – March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………................................................................. ii Part I: Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Terms and Definitions ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Planning Area ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Existing Literature, Archives, and Outreach ………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Part II: How to Use this Document …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 What is a Historic Context Statement? …………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Overview of Applicable Designation Programs ……………………………………………………………………………… 6 Document Organization ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 Part III: Historic Context Statement ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 Pre-Settlement to 1917 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Early Development & the Influence of Surrounding Development (1918-1949) …………………………… 15 Theme #1: Aviation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Mid-Century Development Boom (1950-1969) …………………………………………………………………………….. 28 Theme #2: Industry ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwood Memorial Park Island Reorganization” (City of San Diego) (RO17-01) Dianne Jacob County Board of Supervisors
    9335 Hazard Way Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 614-7755 FAX (858) 614-7766 San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission Website: www.sdlafco.org Chairman Sam Abed Mayor City of Escondido April 3, 2017 Vice Chairwoman 7 Jo MacKenzie TO: Local Agency Formation Commission Vista Irrigation District FROM: Executive Officer Members Chief Analyst, Policy Research Bill Horn County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: “Greenwood Memorial Park Island Reorganization” (City of San Diego) (RO17-01) Dianne Jacob County Board of Supervisors Andrew Vanderlaan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Member Proposed by resolution of the City of San Diego is a reorganization involving Lorie Zapf Councilmember annexation of 24 unincorporated parcels, totaling approximately 120.67- City of San Diego acres, to the City of San Diego, with a concurrent detachment of the proposal Vacant area from County Service Area (CSA) No. 135 (Regional Communications City Member System). The proposed reorganization area is located within the adopted Ed Sprague Olivenhain Municipal sphere of influence of the City of San Diego and comprises an Water District unincorporated island that is 100% surrounded by the City. Alternate Members The concurrent detachment from CSA No. 135 is necessary as the City would Greg Cox assume responsibility for emergency communication services for the County Board of Supervisors proposal area upon annexation. Annexation of the proposal area would Chris Cate remove the largest existing unincorporated island within the City of San Councilmember Diego’s incorporated territory. City of San Diego Racquel Vasquez The City of San Diego has adopted a resolution of application to annex the Mayor unincorporated island pursuant to Government Code Sections 56375.3 and City of Lemon Grove 56654, and submitted a plan for services in accordance with Government Harry Mathis Public Member Code Section 56653, that describes how the City will extend and finance services to the proposal area.
    [Show full text]