DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C to California’S Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C to California’S Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations Appendix C to California’s Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations Prime Nameplate Generator mover Capacity Summer ARB Updated List EPA Original Plant Name Operator Name ORIS Code ID Fuel type type (MW) Capacity (MW) EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Rollins Nevada Irrigation District 34 1P WAT HY 12.1 12.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Venice Metropolitan Water District 72 1 WAT HY 10.1 10.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE J S Eastwood Southern California Edison Co 104 1 WAT PS 199.8 199.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 1 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 2 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 1 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 2 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 3 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 1 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 2 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Volta 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 180 1 WAT HY 1.0 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 1 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 2 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Angels Utica Power Authority 215 1 WAT HY 1.4 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 217 1 WAT HY 31.0 31.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 2 WAT HY 48.6 52.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 3 WAT HY 48.6 55.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Belden Pacific Gas & Electric Co 219 1 WAT HY 117.9 115.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Bucks Creek Pacific Gas & Electric Co 220 H1 WAT HY 33.0 29.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Bucks Creek Pacific Gas & Electric Co 220 H2 WAT HY 33.0 25.2 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Butt Valley Pacific Gas & Electric Co 221 1 WAT HY 40.0 40.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Caribou 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 222 1 WAT HY 23.8 24.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Caribou 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 222 2 WAT HY 25.0 27.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Caribou 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 222 3 WAT HY 25.0 23.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Caribou 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 223 4 WAT HY 60.3 60.3 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Caribou 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 223 5 WAT HY 57.6 57.6 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Centerville Pacific Gas & Electric Co 224 1 WAT HY 5.5 5.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Centerville Pacific Gas & Electric Co 224 2 WAT HY 0.9 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Chili Bar Pacific Gas & Electric Co 225 1 WAT HY 7.0 7.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Coal Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric Co 226 1 WAT HY 1.0 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Coleman Pacific Gas & Electric Co 227 1 WAT HY 12.1 13.0 OGST OGST Contra Costa Mirant Delta LLC 228 6 NG ST 359.0 337.0 OGST OGST Contra Costa Mirant Delta LLC 228 7 NG ST 359.0 337.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Cow Creek Pacific Gas & Electric Co 229 1 WAT HY 0.7 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Cow Creek Pacific Gas & Electric Co 229 2 WAT HY 0.7 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Cresta Pacific Gas & Electric Co 231 1 WAT HY 36.9 36.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Cresta Pacific Gas & Electric Co 231 2 WAT HY 36.9 36.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE De Sabla Pacific Gas & Electric Co 232 1 WAT HY 18.4 18.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Deer Creek Pacific Gas & Electric Co 233 1 WAT HY 5.5 5.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Drum 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 235 1 WAT HY 12.0 12.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Drum 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 235 2 WAT HY 12.0 12.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Drum 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 235 3 WAT HY 12.0 12.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Drum 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 235 4 WAT HY 13.2 14.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Drum 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 236 5 WAT HY 53.1 48.6 Heat Input Electric UNITKEEP Unit Commenced Capacity Generation Carbon Dioxide (CA<25 part of CC Cogn Unit Retirement Operations in NERC (mmBtu/hr) (MWh) Emissions (tons) with CT>25) Source Category Flag Y/N Status Year Exclusion Description Data Year Interconnection 0.0 56,325.00 0.00 IPP Non-CHP N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 6,972.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 179,428.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 1,947.50 2,791.74 Electric Utility N OP Simple cycle unit Western 0.0 1,947.50 2,791.74 Electric Utility N OP Simple cycle unit Western 0.0 2,586.67 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 2,586.67 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 2,586.67 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 1,978.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 1,978.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 3,006.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 1,895.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 1,895.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OS 2013 Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 5,772.00 0.00 IPP Non-CHP N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 104,804.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 139,455.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 139,455.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 202,966.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 94,348.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 94,348.50 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 104,855.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 27,656.05 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 29,050.47 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 29,050.47 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 181,372.07 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 173,250.93 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 0.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OS Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 0.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OS Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 24,013.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 0.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OA 2013 Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 48,961.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 3,404.0 13,795.00 12,126.85 IPP Non-CHP N OP 2013 Western 3,400.0 117,575.00 83,710.45 IPP Non-CHP N OP 2013 Western 0.0 2,103.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP 2014 Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 2,103.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP 2014 Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 110,081.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 110,081.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 75,349.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 20,730.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 8,497.56 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 8,497.56 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 8,497.56 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 9,347.32 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western 0.0 271,751.00 0.00 Electric Utility N OP Non Combustion (NUC, WAT, WND, GEO, or SUN) Western Prime Nameplate Generator mover Capacity Summer ARB Updated List EPA Original Plant Name Operator Name ORIS Code ID Fuel type type (MW) Capacity (MW) EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Dutch Flat Pacific Gas & Electric Co 237 1 WAT HY 22.0 22.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE El Dorado El Dorado Irrigation District 238 1 WAT HY 10.0 10.3 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE El Dorado El Dorado Irrigation District 238 2 WAT HY 10.0 10.3 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Electra Pacific Gas & Electric Co 239 1 WAT HY 32.3 32.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Electra Pacific Gas & Electric Co 239 2 WAT HY 35.1 31.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Electra Pacific Gas & Electric Co 239 3 WAT HY 35.1 36.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Haas Pacific Gas & Electric Co 240 H1 WAT HY 67.5 73.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Haas Pacific Gas & Electric Co 240 H2 WAT HY 67.5 73.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Halsey Pacific Gas & Electric Co 241 1 WAT HY 13.6 10.4 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hamilton Branch Pacific Gas & Electric Co 242 1 WAT HY 2.6 2.4 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hamilton Branch Pacific Gas & Electric Co 242 2 WAT HY 2.7 2.4 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hat Creek 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 243 1 WAT HY 10.0 8.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hat Creek 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 244 1 WAT HY 10.0 8.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC1 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC10 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC2 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC3 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC4 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC5 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC6 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC7 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Humboldt Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Co 246 IC8 NG IC 16.7 16.7 EXCLUDE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Board-Approved 2013-2014 Transmission Plan
    2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Center 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S
    10-K 1 cpn_10kx12312014.htm CALPINE 10-K FOR YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF [X] 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT [ ] OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-12079 ______________________ Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 77-0212977 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 830-2000 Not Applicable (Former Address) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Calpine Corporation Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • CSP Technologies
    CSP Technologies Solar Solar Power Generation Radiation fuel Concentrating the solar radiation in Concentrating Absorbing Storage Generation high magnification and using this thermal energy for power generation Absorbing/ fuel Reaction Features of Each Types of Solar Power PTC Type CRS Type Dish type 1Axis Sun tracking controller 2 Axis Sun tracking controller 2 Axis Sun tracking controller Concentrating rate : 30 ~ 100, ~400 oC Concentrating rate: 500 ~ 1,000, Concentrating rate: 1,000 ~ 10,000 ~1,500 oC Parabolic Trough Concentrator Parabolic Dish Concentrator Central Receiver System CSP Technologies PTC CRS Dish commercialized in large scale various types (from 1 to 20MW ) Stirling type in ~25kW size (more than 50MW ) developing the technology, partially completing the development technology development is already commercialized efficiency ~30% reached proper level, diffusion level efficiency ~16% efficiency ~12% CSP Test Facilities Worldwide Parabolic Trough Concentrator In 1994, the first research on high temperature solar technology started PTC technology for steam generation and solar detoxification Parabolic reflector and solar tracking system were developed <The First PTC System Installed in KIER(left) and Second PTC developed by KIER(right)> Dish Concentrator 1st Prototype: 15 circular mirror facets/ 2.2m focal length/ 11.7㎡ reflection area 2nd Prototype: 8.2m diameter/ 4.8m focal length/ 36㎡ reflection area <The First(left) and Second(right) KIER’s Prototype Dish Concentrator> Dish Concentrator Two demonstration projects for 10kW dish-stirling solar power system Increased reflection area(9m dia. 42㎡) and newly designed mirror facets Running with Solo V161 Stirling engine, 19.2% efficiency (solar to electricity) <KIER’s 10kW Dish-Stirling System in Jinhae City> Dish Concentrator 25 20 15 (%) 10 발전 효율 5 Peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Budget & Finance Committee Questions on SEIP
    Responses to Budget & Finance Committee Questions on the Pilot Solar Energy Incentive Program GoSolarSF Power Enterprise, SFPUC Introduction to the Program The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission proposed to initiate, as a pilot program, the Solar Energy Incentive Payment program, pending before Budget and Finance Committee. The pilot program would provide a financial incentive for San Francisco residents and businesses to install solar (photovoltaic) energy systems on their properties. The pilot Solar Energy Incentive Program, announced in December 2007, and supported by the Public Utilities Commission in Resolution 08-0004, would provide from $3,000 to $5,000 for residential installations and up to $10,000 for commercial photovoltaic installations. The pilot program would offer a one-time incentive payment for local solar electric projects to reduce the cost of installation. The pilot program would have three distinct incentives for residential installations. The incentives are limits on assistance, meaning that the higher incentives are not additive to the lower ones, but are total incentives. The incentive for businesses is a simple capacity-based incentive. Residents Businesses Basic Incentive $3,000 City installer incentive $4,000 $1.50 per Watt a system is designed to generate, up to a cap of $10,000. Environmental justice $5,000 incentive Incentive payments are tied to individual electric meters, meaning that buildings with more than one meter or applicants owning more than one property are eligible for more than one incentive payment, subject to the provisions below. Any system whose California Solar Initiative incentive reservation date is on or after December 11th 2007 would be eligible for the pilot San Francisco incentive.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A: System Data
    2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Cener 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Concentrating Solar Thermal Research and Technology Related Titles
    Advances in Concentrating Solar Thermal Research and Technology Related titles Performance and Durability Assessment: Optical Materials for Solar Thermal Systems (ISBN 978-0-08-044401-7) Solar Energy Engineering 2e (ISBN 978-0-12-397270-5) Concentrating Solar Power Technology (ISBN 978-1-84569-769-3) Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy Advances in Concentrating Solar Thermal Research and Technology Edited by Manuel J. Blanco Lourdes Ramirez Santigosa AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Woodhead Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier Woodhead Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier The Officers’ Mess Business Centre, Royston Road, Duxford, CB22 4QH, United Kingdom 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009
    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Photovoltaic Plus Storage
    Photovoltaic plus Storage – Part 2, Projects By John Benson February 2019 1. Introduction Part 2 will describe recent major U.S. PV and storage projects and some new twists on residential PV plus storage. Part 1 of this paper (linked below) is on new technologies for utility-scale PV, utility-scale storage and PV plus storage systems, and the evolution of missions. https://www.energycentral.com/c/cp/photovoltaic-plus-storage-%E2%80%93-part-1- technology 2. Projects The projects described below include PV plus storage, PV-only and storage only. 2.1. Arizona Public Service and First Solar A 65 megawatt (MW) project is making news by coupling PV with battery energy storage systems (BESS), a first for utility Arizona Public Service, which solicited proposals in 2017 for generation sources to provide electricity during peak demand hours.1 The solar-plus-storage bid beat out other generation sources, including multiple proposals for natural gas plants. The utility has an agreement with an existing natural gas-fired plant for a total of 570 MW for the summers of 2020 through 2026. A dramatic drop in the cost of BESS, driven in large part by an increase in lithium-ion battery production to satisfy growing demand for electric vehicles allows a PV + storage project to be competitive with gas peakers plus offer more capabilities. Storage is capable of providing services like frequency regulation, which maintains the grid’s electric frequency on a second-to-second basis, and reactive power support, which supports the voltage that must be controlled for grid reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Comments on The
    CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department
    [Show full text]