DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Construction Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Construction Development Major Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated March 7, 2016 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all major solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time-scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility-scale solar power. This list includes ground-mounted solar power plants 1 MW and larger. Example Projects Nevada Solar One Sierra SunTower Nellis Air Force Base DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center Developer: Acciona Developer: eSolar Developer: MMA Renewable Ventures Developer: Florida Power & Light Co. Electricity Purchaser: NV Energy Electricity Purchaser: Southern Electricity Purchaser: Nellis AFB Electricity Purchaser: Florida Power & California Edison Light Co. Location: Boulder City, NV Location: Antelope Valley, CA Location: Clark County, NV Location: Arcadia, FL Technology: Trough Technology: Tower Technology: PV Technology: PV Capacity: 64 MW Capacity: 5 MW Capacity: 14 MW Capacity: 25 MW Source: Acciona North America Source: eSolar Source: MMA Renewable Ventures Source: Florida Power & Light Major Steps to Bring a Utility-Scale Solar Plant Online Development Construction Operation Private versus Public Land Solar projects proposed on public lands overseen by the federal government must complete a full Environmental Impact Statement before being issued a construction permit by the U.S. Department of the Interior. This review process, which takes as long as four years to complete, involves coordinated analyses by federal, state and local stakeholders to identify the potential impacts of a proposed project. On June 29th, 2009, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced "Fast-Track" initiatives for solar projects on lands in the West. Currently, 14 solar projects have received the "Fast-Track" distinction and are undergoing environmental review. The "Fast-Track" initiative goal is to focus BLM efforts on promising projects in order to complete review prior to the December 2010 deadline required to qualify for some funding programs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. For more information on the "Fast-Track" solar projects, please visit: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/energy/renewable_energy/fast-track_renewable.html For more information: Press inquiries should be directed to Alex Hobson ([email protected]) If you have comments on this list, please contact [email protected]. Major Solar Project Capacity by Technology and Completion Status (MW) Technology Operating Under Construction Under Development Grand Total CSP 1,771 115 1,880 3,766 PV 14,026 3,050 51,609 68,685 Grand Total 15797 3165 53489 72451 CSP Operating UnderUnder Construction Construction UnderUnder Development Development8% TotalTotal Project Project Pipeline PipelineCSP CSP CSP 11% CSP CSP 11% CSP CSP 4% 5% 17% 19% 4% PVPV PVPV PVPV PVPV 83%89% 81%96% 92%96% 89%95% Major Solar Project Capacity by State and Project Completion Status (MW) State Operating Under Construction Under Development Grand Total AL 83 83 AR 81 81 AZ 1657 5 3585 5246 CA 7644 1449 33649 42743 CO 145 170 288 604 CT 18 3 23 43 DE 33 33 FL 146 1335 1481 GA 128 432 560 HI 59 12 510 580 ID 651 651 IL 40 10 50 IN 140 31 171 KS 1 1 KY 2 5 7 MA 787 30 120 937 MD 85 6 25 116 MI 1 11 12 MN 2 112 114 MO 24 1 8 33 MS 53 53 NC 1440 215 4278 5933 NH 1 1 NJ 913 12 488 1414 NM 307 525 832 NV 1012 487 3911 5410 NY 69 9 58 136 OH 47 98 145 OR 15 4 19 PA 53 20 73 RI 12 12 SC 3 35 38 TN 50 50 TX 294 471 1073 1838 UT 173 262 1058 1493 VA 3 582 585 VT 55 5 60 WA 1 75 76 WI 3 3 (blank) 439 23 243 704 Grand Total 15,797 3,165 53,489 72,451 Major Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction or Under Development Updated: March 7, 2016 Developer Status Project Name City/CountyState PV/CSP Online Date Capacity 510 REPP One, LLC Operating 510 REPP One Garysburg NC PV 1.3 8minutenergy Renewables, LLC Operating Mount Signal Solar Farm Calexico CA PV Q2 2014 206.0 Abengoa Operating Mojave Solar San BernardinoCA CountyCSP Dec. 2014 250.0 Abengoa Operating Solana Gila Bend AZ CSP 280.0 Acciona Operating Nevada Solar One Boulder CityNV CSP 64.0 Acciona Operating Nevada Solar One Expansion Boulder CityNV CSP 11.0 Adams Community Solar Garden IIIOperating LLC Adams Community Solar Garden III LLC CO PV Jul. 2015 1.2 Adams Community Solar Garden LLCOperating Adams Community Solar Garden LLC CO PV Jul. 2015 1.2 Adelanto Solar II, LLC Operating Adelanto Solar II, LLC Adelanto CA PV 2015 7.0 Advanced Solar Products Operating Linden Solar Farm Linden NJ PV 3.2 AES Solar Operating Imperial Valley Solar Project PhaseCalexico 1 CA PV Aug. 2013 200.0 Alamo Solar, LLC Operating Alamo Solar Oro GrandeCA PV 2015 20.0 Albemarle Solar Center, LLC Operating Albemarle Solar Center Kinston NC PV 15.0 Albiasa Operating Kingman CSP Project Paradise CA CSP 200.0 Alexander & Baldwin Operating Port Allen Solar Farm Eleele HI PV Dec. 2013 6.0 Algonquin Power Co Operating Algonquin SKIC20 Solar LLC CA PV 2015 20.0 AllEarth Renewables Operating Vermont National Guard Solar South BurlingtonVT PV Oct. 2014 1.5 AllEarth Renewables Operating Claire Solar Farm South BurlingtonVT PV Alteris Renewables Operating RUTLA020821 Rutland MA PV 2.5 Ameren Missouri Operating O'Fallon Renewable Energy CenterO'Fallon MO PV 5.7 Ameresco Operating Sudbury Landfill Sudbury MA PV 2013 1.5 Ameresco Operating Lowell - Landfill Lowell MA PV 2013 1.5 Ameresco, Inc. Operating Braintree Landfill Solar PV Braintree MA PV 2015 1.3 American Capital Energy Operating Searchlight Solar Searchlight NV PV 20.0 American Capital Energy Operating Yardville Solar Farm Hamilton NJ PV 4.3 American Capital Energy Operating Campbell Soup Supply Company, LLCSacramentoCA PV 2012 2.0 American Capital Energy Operating William Stanley Business Park Pittsfield MA PV 2010 2.0 American Capital Energy Operating Buckman Direct Diversion 2A SolarSanta Project Fe NM PV Jun. 2014 1.5 American Capital Energy Operating Edgartown Nunnepog Edgartown MA PV 1.4 American Capital Energy Operating Edgartown Katama Farm Edgartown MA PV 1.3 American Capital Energy CompanyOperating Bradford Solar Haverhill MA PV 6.0 American Capital Energy CompanyOperating Avon Solar, LLC Avon MA PV 2014 1.2 American Capital Energy, Inc. Operating Silver Lake Solar Photovoltaic FacilityPittsfield MA PV 2010 1.8 American Municipal Power Operating Napoleon Solar Facility Napoleon OH PV Sep. 2012 4.0 Amresco SouthWest Operating Unknown 24 Tempe AZ PV Oct. 2010 1.0 Anderson Solar LLC Operating Anderson Solar Roseboro NC PV 2.0 Andrew Solar, LLC Operating Andrew Solar NC PV 2015 5.0 Angel Solar, LLC Operating Angel Solar NC PV 2015 5.0 Apple One, LLC Operating Apple One NC PV 2015 5.0 ARCO Solar Inc., Siemens Solar Operating Rancho Seco Nuclear Station Herald CA PV 3.0 Argand Energy Operating Franklin Solar Louisburg NC PV 2.0 Arizona Public Service Operating Gila Bend Solar Gila Bend AZ PV 32.0 Arizona Public Service Operating Foothills Solar Plant Yuma AZ PV 2013 18.0 Arizona Public Service Operating Hyder Solar Plant II Hyder AZ PV 14.0 Ashley Solar Farm, LLC Operating Ashley Solar Farm NC PV Mar. 2015 4.0 Aspen Solar, LLC Operating Aspen Solar NC PV 2015 5.0 AstroSol Operating AstroSol Tech Park AZ Tucson AZ PV May. 2012 5.0 Ausra Operating Kimberlina Bakersfield CA CSP 5.0 Avean Engineering Operating Unknown 5 Tempe AZ PV Dec. 2011 2.1 Avidan Energy Solutions Operating 145 Talmadge Solar Edison NJ PV Apr. 2011 4.6 Axio Power Operating The Greenfield Solar Farm Greenfield MA PV 2.0 Bailey Farm, LLC Operating Bailey Farm Bailey NC PV 5.0 Bakersfield 111 LLC Operating Bakersfield 111 Bakersfield CA PV 2015 1.4 Balsam Solar, LLC Operating Balsam Solar NC PV 2015 5.0 BAP Power Corporation Operating 433 Purchase Solar NG Swansea MA PV 2012 1.9 BAP Power Corporation Operating 433 Purchase Solar NG Swansea MA PV 2012 1.3 Barton Solar LLC Operating Barton Solar Farm Barton VT PV Nov. 2014 1.9 Battleground Solar I, LLC Operating Battleground Solar I Kings MountainNC PV 3.0 Bearpond Solar Center, LLC Operating Bearpond Solar Center Henderson NC PV 5.0 Beaumont Solar Co. Operating Kingfisher Corp. Dartmouth MA PV 2014 6.0 Bella Energy Operating Salt Palace Solar Project Salt Lake CityUT PV May. 2012 1.7 Beth Solar, LLC Operating Beth Solar NC PV 5.0 Bethel Farm, LLC Operating Bethel Farm NC PV 5.0 Bethel Solar, LLC Operating Bethel Solar NC PV 2015 5.0 Beulaville Solar, LLC Operating Beulaville Solar Beulaville NC PV 2.0 BG Stewart Solar Farm, LLC Operating BG Stewart Solar Farm, LLC NC PV 2015 7.0 Birdseye Renewable Energy Operating Manis Solar Farm Laurinburg NC PV Apr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Concentrated Photovoltaic
    Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV) - Global Installation Size, Cost Analysis, Efficiencies and Competitive Analysis to 2020 Reference Code: GDAE1043MAR Publication Date: April 2011 The US, Germany and Japan are Key Countries for the CPV–The Emerging Solar Technology Industry CPV is an upcoming renewable market which promises to In 2010 Spain dominated the global CPV market with around provide cost-effective power generation at high levels of XX MW of cumulative installed capacity. Spain accounts for efficiency. Presently, the global CPV cumulative installed XX% of the global CPV installed base. Most parts of the country capacity is XX MW. The technology is still developing and so experience high DNI which attracts CPV installers for most CPV projects are in the pilot or prototype stage. Guascor investments in Spain. The US follows Spain with a cumulative Foton’s Navarre power plant and Murcia power plant are the installed capacity of around XX MW; thereby accounting for largest CPV plants with installed capacities of XX MW and XX XX% of the global CPV installed capacity. Greece and Australia MW respectively. Globally, Spain has the largest market for have also attracted CPV system installers due to a high DNI CPV installations. In the US, the major emerging companies are concentration. These countries account for approximately XX% SolFocus, Amonix, EMCORE and Skyline Solar. European and XX% of the global CPV cumulative installed capacity companies such as Concentrix, Abengoa Solar and ArimaEco respectively. have also started making progress in the CPV market. Global Cumulative Installations to Reach XX GW by 2020 Concentrated PV Market, Global, Cumulative Installed Capacity by Country, %, 2010 The CPV market is expected to grow dramatically over the next three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern County, California
    2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Matt Hagemann · Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: [email protected] August 22, 2012 Gideon Kracov Attorney at Law 801 S. Grand Ave, llu' Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Comments on the Beacon Photovoltaic Project Dear Mr. Kracov: We have reviewed the July 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"i for the Beacon Photovoltaic Project ("Project"). The Project proposes to build a 250-megawatt solar generation facility on approximately 3.6 square miles of land four miles north of California City in Kern County, California. Project components include: • A photovoltaic (PV) solar power generation facllity containing approximately 972,000 panels; • 230 ki lovolt overhead transmission line; • Operations and maintenance building, parking lot, office, and sewer system; and • Access roads (DEIR, p. 3-9). We have reviewed the DEIR for issues associated with air quality, hydrology and water quality, and ha za rds and hazardous materials. The DEIR fails to adequately disclose potentially significa nt impacts from Project constru.ction on workers and offsite r eceptors. A revised DEIR needs to be prepared to adequately disclose and analyze these impacts and provide mitigation, if necessary.· Air Quality The Project is located in t he Eastern Kern Air Pollution Cont rol District ("EKAPCD") and the M ojave Desert Air Basin ("MOAB"). Both the EKAPCD and t he M DAB are designated non-attainment for PMlO (DEIR, pp. 4.2-3, 22). Significant emlssion.s of P:MlO and its contributing sources, such as NOx, will lead 1 to a worsening of regional air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Permitted/Approved Renewable Energy Facilities NORTHERN NEVADA SOUTHERN NEVADA 1150 E
    Permitted/Approved Renewable Energy Facilities NORTHERN NEVADA SOUTHERN NEVADA 1150 E. William Street 9075 W. Diablo Dr., Ste. 250 Carson City, NV 89701 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (775) 684-6101 Phone: (702) 486-7210 Fax: (775) 684-6110 Fax: (702) 486-7206 Consumer Complaints: (775) 684-6100 Consumer Complaints: (702) 486-2600 Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 704.865, the PUCN approves Utility Environmental Protection Act (UEPA) permits for all privately- owned conventional (natural gas, oil, coal, nuclear) utility facilities constructed in Nevada. The PUCN also approves the construction of renewable energy projects with an output greater than 70 megawatts, and transmission for renewable energy greater than 200 kilovolts. Additionally, the PUCN approves purchase power agreements (PPAs) between NV Energy and conventional utility and renewable energy facilities. See the table below for a comprehensive list of renewable energy projects in Nevada with a PUCN- approved UEPA permit and/or PPA. Projects Within Nevada that Received PUCN PUCN Approval Project Details Approval MW Exporting/Internal Project UEPA¹ PPA² COD³ Notes⁶ Nameplate⁴ Generation⁵ Biogas 1 Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility X 2005 0.80 Internal 2004 Geothermal 2 Beowawe X 2006 17.70 Internal 05-5010 3 Buffalo/Jersey Valley X N/A 24.00 N/A 06-10021 4 Brady X 1992 24.00 Internal 1990 5 Carson Lake X N/A 31.50 N/A 06-10021 6 Carson Lake Basin Project X N/A 62.00 N/A 07-07013 7 Clayton Valley 1 X N/A 53.50 N/A 10-03022 8 Coyote Canyon X N/A 70.00 Exporting 11-06014 9
    [Show full text]
  • Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake?
    Greentech Media http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/print/Are-DOE-Loan-Guarantee... RESEARCH & ANALYSIS | POLICY ERIC WESOFF: JUNE 2, 2011 Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake? It’s the Liberals versus the Libertarians: Is the DOE Loan Guarantee Program a righteous creator of jobs and new industry or a wrongful use of taxpayer money? The United States DOE Loan Guarantee Program has disbursed $30.7 billion and claims to have created or saved 62,350 jobs. The loan program has three categories: Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorizes the DOE to support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks. Section 1705 is a temporary program designed to address the current economic conditions of the nation. It authorizes loan guarantees for certain renewable energy systems, electric power transmission systems and leading edge biofuels projects that commence construction no later than September 30, 2011. The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program consists of direct loans to support the development of advanced technology vehicles and associated components in the U.S. The more publicized loan guarantee recipients include Solyndra , BrightSource Energy , Ford, Fisker , and Tesla. (See the more complete list of loan recipients at the end of this article.) The Loan Program Office (LPO) has issued conditional commitments to 13 power generation projects with cumulative project costs of over $27 billion. This represents a greater investment in clean energy generation projects than the entire private sector made in 2009 ($10.6 billion), and almost as much as was invested in such projects in 2008 -- the peak financing year to date ($22.6 billion), according to the DOE.
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder Solar Power JUN 3 2016 MBR App.Pdf
    20160603-5296 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 6/3/2016 12:51:20 PM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Boulder Solar Power, LLC ) Docket No. ER16-_____-000 APPLICATION FOR MARKET-BASED RATE AUTHORIZATION, REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF CATEGORY 1 SELLER STATUS, REQUEST FOR WAIVERS AND BLANKET AUTHORIZATIONS, AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PRIOR NOTICE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”),1 Section 35.12 of the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”),2 Rules 204 and 205 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,3 and FERC Order Nos. 697, et al.4 and Order No. 816,5 Boulder Solar Power, LLC (“Applicant”) hereby requests that the Commission: (1) accept Applicant’s proposed baseline market-based rate tariff (“MBR Tariff”) for filing; (2) authorize Applicant to sell electric energy, capacity, and certain ancillary services at market-based rates; (3) designate Applicant as a Category 1 Seller in all regions; and (4) grant Applicant such waivers and blanket authorizations as the Commission has granted to other sellers with market-based rate authorization. Applicant requests that the Commission waive its 60-day prior notice requirement6 to allow Applicant’s MBR Tariff to become effective as of July 1, 2016. In support of this Application, Applicant states as follows: 1 16 U.S.C. § 824d (2012). 2 18 C.F.R. § 35.12 (2016). 3 Id. §§ 385.204 and 385.205. 4 Mkt.-Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Elec. Energy, Capacity & Ancillary Servs. by Pub. Utils., Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Kevin Thornton for IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085
    Contact: Kevin Thornton FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085 WAL-MART ANNOUNCES SOLAR POWER PILOT PROJECT Pilot Project marks major step toward its goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy BENTONVILLE, Ark., May 7, 2007 – Today Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), announced a major purchase of solar power from three solar power providers, BP Solar, SunEdison LLC, and PowerLight, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation, for 22 combined Wal- Mart stores, Sam’s Clubs and a distribution center in Hawaii and California. As part of a pilot project to determine solar power viability for Wal-Mart, the total solar power production from the 22 sites is estimated to be as much as 20 million kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year. When fully implemented, the aggregate purchase could be one of the U.S., if not the world’s, top-10 largest ever solar power initiatives. “We are taking aggressive steps towards our goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy,” said Kim Saylors-Laster, vice president of energy for Wal-Mart. “The pilot project is yet another example of Wal-Mart’s commitment to making decisions that are good for business and the environment.” “We applaud Wal-Mart's drive to increase its use of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies and look forward to the long-term positive impact their efforts will have on our environment,” said Ron Judkoff, director of the Buildings and Thermal Systems Center at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). “Wal-Mart's decision to take advantage of the economic and environmental benefits of solar power and energy efficiency technologies is a great step in the right direction.” The solar power pilot project is a major step toward Wal-Mart’s goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy
    Projects Projects Renewable Energy Representative Engagements • Represented the project sponsor in connection with • Advised client on a significant investment in Nemaska the non-recourse project financing of the development, Lithium Inc., a Canadian lithium company, in a trans- installation, operation and maintenance of over 150,000 formational market transaction involving a key input in small-scale solar kits in areas of Peru not connected to lithium batteries which are a key component in electric the grid. cars and other technologies as well as renewables • Represented the Buyer acquiring 100 percent of the storage projects. equity interests of two project companies that have two • Advised the underwriters in DTE Electric Company’s solar photovoltaic projects with a combined rating of milestone $525 million green bond offering. Proceeds 6.5MWac/8MWdc on Oahu, Hawaii. of the bonds will support the development and • Represented a multinational energy corporation in construction of low-carbon, clean energy projects like connection with the acquisition of, and its tax equity solar arrays and wind farms, as well as the transmission investment in, solar power generating facilities in infrastructure to support related renewable facilities. California, Texas and Arizona valued from $16 million Solar to $25 million, including one project located on a • Represented Duke Energy in connection with a $360 military base under the U.S. military’s renewable energy million non-recourse project financing of a portfolio procurement initiative. of 24 operating solar farms in North Carolina under • Represented one of the world’s largest solar energy contract with various utility and non-utility offtakers. project companies in its entry into Japan and projects The facility includes a $330 million term loan, a $105 utilizing the Japanese Feed-In Tariff.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Development Plan
    Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Energy Storage Development Plan Grid Planning and Development System Studies and Research Group September 2, 2014 This space is intentionally left blank Table of Contents: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 B. Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 1 C. Energy Storage Targets ........................................................................................... 1 1. Overview and Policy ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 B. Background ............................................................................................................. 3 C. ES Regulation, Policy, and Legislative Impacts ..................................................... 5 2. Scope & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Storage System Development Strategy ...................................................... 6 B. Energy Storage System Target Development Schedule ......................................... 6 3. Description of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Ofthe Interior
    United States Department ofthe Interior FISH AND Wll.DLIFE SERVICE Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office ·' 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, california 93003 Dl REPLY IUiFlIIlTO: Bl440-201G-F-D096 . 8-8-1G-F-24 , : October 1.2010 ,I DATE-, (CCTO 1 201/) ,1"_ - -.. ". ~ Memorandum. " REeD; (OCT :~ 8 201 To: District Manager, California Desert'District, Bureau ofLand Management, Morenoyalley. CalifO~ From: FielJ?~~v~ru:m FiSh and Wildlife Office. Ventura. California Subject: Biological Opinion on BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah Solar E;lectric Generating System Project, San Bernardino County. California [CACA-48668, 49502, 49503, 49504] (8-8-1O-F-24) This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review ofthe Bureau ofLand Management's (Bureau) proposed issuance ofa right-of­ way grant to Solar Partners I. LLC. Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII. LLC for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) and its effects on the federally threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizil) in accordance with section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Because BrightSource Energy is a parent company for all Solar Partner Companies, this biological opiniO:J;l refers to the project proponents collectively as BrightSource. 'The proposed project involves construction, operation, maintenance,and decommissioning of a 370-megawatt solar thermal power plant and associated infrastructure and facilities on 3.5~2 acres ofpublic land managed by the Bureau. Your December 7, 2009 request for formal consultation was received on December 8, 2009. This biological opinion is based on information that accompanied your December 7, 2009 request for consultation and additional information regarding changes in the project description and tranSlocation strategy obtained from Bureau staff during the formal consultation p~ocess.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis
    1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • SEIA BOARD FACEBOOK *Updated March 2016
    SEIA BOARD FACEBOOK *Updated March 2016 8MINUTENERGY RENEWABLES, LLC 8minutenergy Renewables, LLC is one of the country's leading developers of ground- mounted solar PV projects, with a portfolio of more than 2,000 megawatts (MW) of solar PV power plant projects. Martin Hermann Board At-Large CEO & Founder Serial entrepreneur with 24 years of experience in the solar, clean-tech and high- tech industries, Developed a 100MW solar PV module manufacturing plant as Chief Strategy Officer with Advent Solar. Arthur Haubenstock Board Alternate General Counsel and Vice President, Government & Regulatory ALLEARTH RENEWABLES, INC. AllEarth Renewables – an Inc. 500 recognized company -- is the designer and manufacturer of the AllSun Tracker, a complete grid-tied, dual-axis solar electric system that uses GPS technology to follow the sun, producing up to 45% more energy than fixed rooftop systems. Made in the U.S.A, the ground-mounted solar tracker has a 120 mph wind rating, 10-year warranty, and is designed for residential and commercial-scale installations. Andrew Savage Elected Director Chief Strategy Officer Served as deputy chief of staff, legislative director and communications director for Vermont Congressman Peter Welch. Chief Strategy Officer at AllEarth Renewables, manufacturer of the AllSun Tracker. Part of President Barack Obama’s successful 2008 presidential primary campaign team Andrew received his bachelor’s degree in political science and environmental studies from Middlebury College graduating summa cum laude. AZTEC SOLAR INC. Aztec Solar is a full-service solar energy provider, including Solar Thermal, Solar AC and Solar Photovoltaic systems for both residential sites and commercial businesses. Aztec offers in-house solar water heating, solar pool heating and solar electric power.
    [Show full text]