DOCSLIB.ORG

Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis 1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively. The proposed Delamar Valley SEZ lies about 23 mi 23 (37 km) to the south of the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ. 24 25 A 69-kV transmission line intersects the southeast corner of the SEZ. It is assumed that 26 this existing transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission 27 grid (see Section 11.4.1.1.2). 28 29 There are one pending solar development ROW application, six authorized and one 30 pending wind site testing applications, and one pending wind development application on BLM- 31 administered land within a 50-mi (80-km) radius of the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ. 32 There are currently no solar applications within the SEZ. These applications are discussed in 33 Section 11.4.22.2.1. 34 35 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is undeveloped and remote. The overall 36 character of the surrounding land is rural. The SEZ is located in the Dry Lake Valley and is 37 framed by mountain ranges on the east and west. The North Pahroc Range rises about 6 mi 38 (10 km) west of the SEZ, and the West Range, Bristol Range, Highland Range, Ely Springs 39 Range, Black Canyon Range, and Burnt Springs Range occur east of the SEZ. No permanent 40 surface water sources occur in the proposed SEZ. Vegetation is generally sparse, with large 41 areas of low grasses and low-height scrubland. 42 43 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ in Nevada and other relevant information are 44 shown in Figure 11.4.1.1-1. The criteria used to identify the proposed Dry Lake Valley North 45 SEZ in Nevada as an appropriate location for solar energy development included proximity to 46 existing transmission lines or designated corridors, proximity to existing roads, a slope of 47 generally less than 2%, and an area of more than 2,500 acres (10 km2). In addition, the area 48 was identified as being relatively free of other types of conflicts, such as USFWS-designated Draft Solar PEIS 11.4-1 December 2010 1 2 FIGURE 11.4.1.1-1 Proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Draft Solar PEIS 11.4-2 December 2010 1 critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, ACECs, SRMAs, and NLCS lands 2 (see Section 2.2.4.1 for the complete list of exclusions). Although these classes of restricted 3 lands were excluded from the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ, other restrictions might 4 be appropriate. The analyses in the following sections address the affected environment and 5 potential impacts associated with utility-scale solar energy development in the proposed SEZ 6 for important environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic resources. 7 8 As initially announced in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009, the proposed Dry Lake 9 Valley North SEZ encompassed 49,775 acres (201 km2). Subsequent to the study area scoping 10 period, the boundaries of the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ were altered substantially 11 after further observations by the BLM District Office indicating that the additional area met all 12 criteria for solar development. The revised SEZ is approximately 27,100 acres (110 km2), or 13 about 54%, larger than the original SEZ as published in June 2009. 14 15 16 11.4.1.2 Development Assumptions for the Impact Analysis 17 18 Maximum solar development of the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is assumed to 19 be 80% of the SEZ area over a period of 20 years; these values are shown in Table 11.4.1.2-1, 20 along with other development assumptions. Full development of the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ 21 would allow development of facilities with an estimated total of 6,833 MW of electrical power 22 capacity if power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies were used, assuming 9 acres/MW 23 (0.04 km2/MW) of land required, and an estimated 12,300 MW of power if solar trough 24 technologies were used, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. 25 26 Availability of transmission from SEZs to load centers will be an important consideration 27 for future development in SEZs. The nearest existing transmission line is a 69-kV line that runs 28 through the SEZ. It is possible that this existing line could be used to provide access from the 29 SEZ to the transmission grid, but the 69-kV capacity of that line would be inadequate for 6,833 30 to 12,300 MW of new capacity (note: a 500- kV line can accommodate approximately the load 31 of one 700-MW facility). At full build-out capacity, it is clear that substantial new transmission 32 and/or upgrades of existing transmission lines would be required to bring electricity from the 33 proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ to load centers; however, at this time, the location and size 34 of such new transmission facilities are unknown. Generic impacts of transmission and associated 35 infrastructure construction and of line upgrades for various resources are discussed in Chapter 5. 36 Project-specific analyses would need to identify the specific impacts of new transmission 37 construction and line upgrades for any projects proposed within the SEZ. 38 39 For the purposes of analysis in the PEIS, it was assumed that an existing 69-kV 40 transmission line that intersects the SEZ could provide initial access to the transmission grid; 41 thus, no additional acreage disturbance for transmission line access was assessed. Access to the 42 existing 69-kV transmission line was assumed, without additional information on whether this 43 line would be available for connection of future solar facilities. If a connecting transmission line 44 were constructed in the future to connect facilities within the SEZ to a different, off-site, grid 45 location from the one assumed here, site developers would need to determine the impacts from 46 construction and operation of that line. In addition, developers would need to determine the 47 impacts of line upgrades if they are needed. Draft Solar PEIS 11.4-3 December 2010 TABLE 11.4.1.2-1 Proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZAssumed Development Acreages, Maximum Solar MW Output, Access Roads, and Transmission Line ROWs Distance to Distance Area of Assumed Nearest and Capacity Assumed Distance to Total Acreage and Maximum SEZ State, U.S., of Nearest Transmission Nearest Assumed Output for or Existing Line ROW Designated Developed Acreage Various Solar Interstate Transmission and Road Transmission (80% of Total) Technologies Highway Line ROW Corridore 76,874 acres and 6,833 MWb NV 318 0 mi and 0 acres and 0 mi 61,499 acresa and 7 mid 69 kV 51 acres 12,300 MWc a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. b Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required. c Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using solar trough technologies, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. d To convert mi to km, multiply by 1.609. e BLM-designated corridors are developed for federal land use planning purposes only and are not applicable to state-owned or privately owned land. 1 2 3 An additional 51 acres (0.2 km2) would be needed for new road access to support solar 4 development in the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ, as summarized in Table 11.4.1.2-1. This 5 estimate was based on the assumption that a new 7-mi (11-km) access road to the nearest major 6 road, State Route 318, would support construction and operation of solar facilities. While there 7 are dirt/ranch roads within the SEZ, additional internal road construction would likely be 8 required to support solar facility construction. 9 10 11 11.4.1.3 Summary of Major Impacts and SEZ-Specific Design Features 12 13 In this section, the impacts and SEZ-specific design features assessed in Sections 11.4.2 14 through 11.4.21 for the proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ are summarized in tabular form.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kern County, California
    2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Matt Hagemann · Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: [email protected] August 22, 2012 Gideon Kracov Attorney at Law 801 S. Grand Ave, llu' Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Comments on the Beacon Photovoltaic Project Dear Mr. Kracov: We have reviewed the July 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"i for the Beacon Photovoltaic Project ("Project"). The Project proposes to build a 250-megawatt solar generation facility on approximately 3.6 square miles of land four miles north of California City in Kern County, California. Project components include: • A photovoltaic (PV) solar power generation facllity containing approximately 972,000 panels; • 230 ki lovolt overhead transmission line; • Operations and maintenance building, parking lot, office, and sewer system; and • Access roads (DEIR, p. 3-9). We have reviewed the DEIR for issues associated with air quality, hydrology and water quality, and ha za rds and hazardous materials. The DEIR fails to adequately disclose potentially significa nt impacts from Project constru.ction on workers and offsite r eceptors. A revised DEIR needs to be prepared to adequately disclose and analyze these impacts and provide mitigation, if necessary.· Air Quality The Project is located in t he Eastern Kern Air Pollution Cont rol District ("EKAPCD") and the M ojave Desert Air Basin ("MOAB"). Both the EKAPCD and t he M DAB are designated non-attainment for PMlO (DEIR, pp. 4.2-3, 22). Significant emlssion.s of P:MlO and its contributing sources, such as NOx, will lead 1 to a worsening of regional air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Development Plan
    Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Energy Storage Development Plan Grid Planning and Development System Studies and Research Group September 2, 2014 This space is intentionally left blank Table of Contents: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 B. Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 1 C. Energy Storage Targets ........................................................................................... 1 1. Overview and Policy ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 B. Background ............................................................................................................. 3 C. ES Regulation, Policy, and Legislative Impacts ..................................................... 5 2. Scope & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Storage System Development Strategy ...................................................... 6 B. Energy Storage System Target Development Schedule ......................................... 6 3. Description of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L000-2017-0006-EA December 20, 2017 SEAMAN and WHITE RIVER HERD AREA WILD HORSE GATHER Location: Lincoln and Nye Counties Applicant/Address: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ely District Office Phone: (775) 289-1800 Fax: (775) 289-1910 Golden Gate, Seaman and White River Herd Area Wild Horse Gather Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L010-2009-0023-EA 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background: .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s): ............................................................. 8 1.4 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or other Plans: ............................................ 8 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING PROPOSED ACTION 10 2.1 Introduction: ............................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Alternative A - Proposed Action: ............................................................................ 10 2.3 Alternative B - No Action: ........................................................................................ 14 2.4 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Further Analysis .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Crd Title P1.Ai
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This chapter describes the potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating a railroad along the Caliente rail alignment or the Mina rail alignment. An impact would be any change, positive or negative, from the existing (baseline) conditions described in Chapter 3 for each environmental resource area. The No-Action Alternative represents a continuation of baseline conditions. Glossary terms are shown in bold italics. DOE/EIS-0369D 4-1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1 Introduction This chapter begins with a description of impacts associated with the No-Action Alternative (Section 4.1.1). As Proposed Action: To determine a described in Section 2.3, under the No-Action Alternative, rail alignment within a rail corridor in which to construct and operate a the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) railroad to transport spent nuclear would not select a rail alignment or build a railroad within fuel, high-level radioactive waste, the Caliente rail corridor or the Mina rail corridor and and other materials from an existing would relinquish public lands withdrawn or segregated from railroad in Nevada to a repository at surface and mineral entry. The description of impacts Yucca Mountain, Nye County, associated with the No-Action Alternative applies to both Nevada. The Proposed Action rail corridors and all rail line alternative segments and includes the construction of railroad common segments. Section 4.1.2 introduces descriptions of construction and operations support impacts associated with the Proposed Action. facilities. This Rail Alignment EIS analyzes two Sections 4.2 and 4.3 describe potential impacts associated alternatives that would implement the with construction and operation of the proposed railroad Proposed Action: the Caliente rail along the Caliente rail alignment and the Mina rail alignment alignment and the Mina rail under the Proposed Action, including a Shared-Use Option.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada
    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988-B I 1 r^Hr-~"r-^S »:-«>'°-;>-.'; '£ '. -"* °-"^^io-'oO;ol!i-..e>L ^? :^~ty-":- o\: s--b>^.'d- .? " ? o..bTvo-r» ?:.-!:.»:-. "o'.-o'-o .- *^-o?.°:.--o : : ° o£\*>: ^-°:* '.« - "o-o- .-o - ^-.o.*'. ^» ' - 1 .". '. O- ' "" "- "* -" no: ^--'*^-o.yvo:»-c)^ - *>- : p.-by :o.;--p-/.-'o."-',c>-( 0 = ?.o'VO -V "±« -* «?'.<?o-oi ^ .. «- .*».-:»: -* ^^»-^ Chapter B Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada By DONLON O. HURTUBISE and EDWARD A. DU BRAY A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS EASTERN GREAT BASIN HARRY E. COOK AND CHRISTOPHER J. POTTER, Project Coordinators U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hurtubise, D.O. Stratigraphy and structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada / by Donlon O. Hurtubise and Edward A. du Bray, p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Eastern Great Basin ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1988-B) Includes bibliographical references.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P
    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Devonian Stratigraphy of the Timpahute Range, Nevada
    STRUCTURE AND DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF THE TIMPAHUTE RANGE, NEVADA Volume I by Alan K. Chamberlain © Copyright, 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date____________ Signed:__________________________ Alan K. Chamberlain Approved:__________________________ Dr. John E. Warme Professor and Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date____________ ____________________________________ Dr. Roger Slatt, Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Sequences of Devonian rocks are advantageously exposed along a unique 40- mile-long east-west traverse in the greater Timpahute Range, southeastern Nevada. Study of these rocks casts light upon Devonian paleogeography, the Devonian Antler orogeny, an Upper Devonian cosmolite impact basin, this part of the Cretaceous Sevier fold-and- thrust belt, and the effects of Cenozoic extension. The greater Timpahute Range lies within the Timpahute Range 30' X 60' quadrangle and includes the region from Tempiute Mountain on the west to the Pahroc Range on the east. Concealed major north-south trending normal faults caused by Cenozoic extension have been proposed to disrupt the Paleozoic rocks of the region. However, a structural interpretation using a new geologic map of the quadrangle requires no major north-south striking normal faults. Furthermore, the greater Timpahute Range is interpreted as a salient of stacked thrust sheets within the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt. The range is bounded on the north and south by thrust tear faults that may be related to basement fractures caused by the cosmolite impact. Evidence for the Late Devonian cosmolite impact includes shocked quartz, iridium anomalies, ejecta spherules, and disturbed shallowing-upward sequences exhibiting intrasequence folding, brecciation, carbonate liquefaction, and graded bedding.
    [Show full text]
  • De Tilla Gulch SEZ Analysis
    1 10.2 DE TILLA GULCH 2 3 4 10.2.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 10.2.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ has a total area of 1,522 acres (6.2 km2) and is 10 located in Saguache County in south-central Colorado (Figure 10.2.1.1-1). In 2008, the county 11 population was 6,903, while the four-county region surrounding the SEZ—Alamosa, Chafee, 12 Saguache, and Rio Grande Counties—had a total population of 51,974. The largest nearby town, 13 which is located about 50 mi (80 km) to the south, is Alamosa with a 2008 population of 8,745. 14 The village of Saguache is located about 8 mi (12 km) west of the SEZ on U.S. 285, which runs 15 along the northwest side of the SEZ. The SLRG Railroad serves the area. The nearest public 16 airport is the Saguache Municipal Airport near the town of Saguache. Santa Fe, New Mexico, 17 lies about 160 mi (257 km) to the south, and Denver, Colorado, is located about 130 mi (209 km) 18 to the northeast. 19 20 An existing 115-kV transmission line is accessible to the SEZ. It is assumed that an 21 existing transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission grid 22 (see Section 10.2.1.2). There were no pending solar project applications within the SEZ as of 23 February 2010. 24 25 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ lies in the northwestern portion of the San Luis Valley, 26 part of the San Luis Basin, a large, high-elevation, basin within the Rocky Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada Reno Analysis of the White River Groundwater Flow System Using a Deuterium-Calibrated Discrete-State Compar
    MINIS lilR A ftt University of Nevada Reno Analysis of the White River Groundwater Flow System Using a Deuterium-Calibrated Discrete-State Compartment Model A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrology and Hydrogeology Mines Library University of Nevada - Reno Reno, Nevada 89557-0044 by Stephen T. Kirk i' * July 1987 II WINtS UMARY " i i t S ' S The thesis of Stephen Thomas Kirk is approved: \AAjiC&OjJ C. Cr Thesis Advisor " University of Nevada Reno July 1987 ACNOWLED GEMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the advice and guidance of Dr. Michael Cam- pana throughout this project. Additional advice was provided by Dr. W. Miller and Dr. D. Tibbitts. Special thanks go to Marcia Olson Kirk for her advice, en­ couragement, and patience. Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Nevada’s Carbonate Aquifers Studies Program and Desert Research Institute, Water Resources Center. IV ABSTRACT The White River Flow System (WRFS), a regional carbonate flow system in eastern Nevada, can be delineated with a discrete-state compartment model using environmental isotope (deuterium) data. Calibrated model results yield the following differences with an earlier conceptual model of WRFS: 1) minimum underflow out of the system along the Pahranagat Shear Zone is 4,000 acre feet per year; 2) minimum recharge from the Sheep Range to Coyote Springs Valley is 5,000 acre feet per year; and 3) minimum underflow from Meadow Valley Wash to Upper Moapa Valley is 4,500 acre feet per year. Calibration of the model using a paleoclimatically induced shift in re­ charge amounts (+35%) and deuterium concentrations (-8<5D) during the Pleistocene support these results.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Briefing Book
    2016 Briefing Book Putting Customers First 1 Introduction 2 LADWP Leadership 3 Power System Power Facts and Figures ........4 Power Supply Transformation 5 Coal Transition ................................. 6 Road to Renewables .....................7-8 Local Solar Programs ................9-10 Rebuilding Power Plants.......... 11-12 Investing in Energy Efficiency....... 13 Greenhouse Gas Reductions ...13-14 Power Reliability ...................14 Electric Transportation......... 15 Advanced Metering ............... 15 Introduction Pre-craft Trainees ................ 16 he Los Angeles Department of leaders and other stakeholders in a Electric Rates and Finance ... 16 Water and Power (LADWP) is the widespread education and outreach nation’s largest municipal utility, effort that encompassed more 17 Water System T having provided water and power than 80 presentations and briefings Water Facts and Figures ...... 18 service to Los Angeles residents and throughout the city. The new rates, Sustainability ....................... 19 businesses for over 100 years. More which were approved by the City Urban Water Management Plan ..19 than 9,400 employees serve the City of Council in March 2016, went into Water Conservation ....................... 20 Los Angeles with water and power in effect April 15, 2016. Recycled Water .............................. 21 a cost-effective and environmentally Stormwater Capture...................... 21 Groundwater Cleanup ................... 22 responsible manner. LADWP is guided Key priorities for the rates request
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]