DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas. A pending annual duty represents the amount of water for which an appropriation application has been submitted to the State Engineer for consideration and that the State Engineer has classified as a pending annual duty value within a hydrographic area in accordance with applicable state statutes. Unless otherwise noted, the source of data for pending annual duties in the hydrographic areas the alignment would cross is the Water Rights Data Update (DIRS 183992-Luellen 2007, all). These data were acquired on May 30, 2007. As part of an effort to assess water resources in the vicinity of the Caliente rail alignment, DOE performed studies to identify groundwater conditions, the locations of springs, seeps, and other surface- water-right locations, and the locations, use, and water-rights status of groundwater-supply wells within 32 kilometers (20 miles) of either side of the centerline of the rail alignment. Information on groundwater characteristics in hydrographic areas the rail alignment would cross and identified groundwater uses and use types within the 62-kilometer (39-mile) search area are compiled in the Water Resources Assessment Report, Caliente Rail Corridor, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada, Task 3.4, Rev. 0 (the Water Resources Assessment Report, Caliente Rail Corridor) (DIRS 182821-Converse Consultants 2007, all). DOE reviewed several other published reports and maps providing information regarding hydrogeologic and groundwater characteristics in hydrographic areas the rail alignment would cross to obtain information to support the groundwater resources impacts assessment. DOE reviewed several well, water-rights, and spring databases, including Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) and U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System (USGS NWIS) databases to identify existing wells with certificated water rights, permitted (PER) wells, domestic wells, springs, seeps, and other surface-water-right locations within the potential region of influence of proposed new groundwater withdrawal wells. Unless noted otherwise, the sources for the spring, seep, other surface-water-right location, and well data in this section are as follows: DIRS 176325-USGS 2006, all; DIRS 177712-MO0607NHDPOINT.000, all; DIRS 177710-MO0607NHDWBDYD.000, all; DIRS 183992-Luellen 2007, all; DIRS 184045-Luellen 2007, all; DIRS 177293-MO0607PWMAR06D.000, all; DIRS 177294-MO0607USGSWNVD.000, all; DIRS 182821-Converse Consultants 2007, all; and DIRS 176979-MO0605GISGNISN.000, all. An initial screening process identified existing wells within 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) of the centerlines of the respective alternative segments, or within 1.6 kilometers of DOE-proposed new wells. As described later in this section, before analyzing potential impacts to groundwater resources, DOE extended the search radius for identifying existing beneficial-use wells, springs, seeps, or other surface-water-right locations up to 2.8 kilometers (1.75 miles) away from a proposed new well if the initial search for such wells or springs within 1.6 kilometers did not reveal the presence of any such wells, springs, seeps, or other surface-water-right locations. Additional well locations identified for consideration included PER wells. Also considered were proposed future wells for which water-rights applications had been submitted to the State Engineer and that had been assigned a status of “Ready for Action (RFA)” or “Ready for Action, Protested (RFP)” by the State Engineer at the time the data were acquired (Section 5.2.1.3.2). Additionally, on a case-by-case basis (see Section 4.2.6 and Appendix G), for a selected set of new groundwater withdrawal wells specifically targeted for installation within a fault zone or an extensive fracture zone, DOE identified the locations of existing wells and springs, seeps, or other surface-water-right locations up to 10 kilometers (6 miles) away from each such proposed well (to address the possibility of fault zones or extensive fracture zones acting as conduits for groundwater flow). The Department derived information for completing this compilation through a review of well-log data and water-rights information obtained from the NDWR. NDWR well- log database entries include a general and legal description of the location of existing wells, along with borehole and well completion information and well testing data (if available). The NDWR water-rights database includes data on the locations, manner of use, and appropriations status of wells having DOE/EIS-0369 3-174 FFECTED NVIRONMENT ALIENTE AIL LIGNMENT A E – C R A Generalized groundwater flow direction through alluvial valley-fill and consolidated rock aquifers in the vicinity of Generalized groundwater flow direction through alluvial valley-fill and consolidated rock Figure 3-73. the Caliente rail alignment. DOE/EIS-0369 3-175 FFECTED NVIRONMENT ALIENTE AIL LIGNMENT A E – C R A Hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross. Figure 3-74. DOE/EIS-0369 3-176 DOE/EIS-0369 3-177 Table 3-35. Perennial yield and annual committed groundwater resources of hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross (page 1 of 2). Annual committed groundwater Designated Hydrographic Perennial yield resources/pending annual groundwater Rail line segment areaa number Hydrographic area name (acre-feet)b,c groundwater duties (acre-feet)d basine Caliente alternative segment, Eccles alternative 204 Clover Valley 1,000 3,787/0 No segment Caliente alternative segment, Eccles alternative 203 Panaca Valley 9,000 31,367/0 Yes segment, Caliente common segment 1 Caliente common segment 1 181 Dry Lake Valley 2,500 57/21,824 No A FFECTED Caliente common segment 1 208 Pahroc Valley 21,000 30/0 No Caliente common segment 1 207 White River Valley 37,000 31,819/42,512 No E Caliente common segment 1; Garden Valley 171 Coal Valley 6,000 38/33,071 No NVIRONMENT alternative segments 1, 2, 3, and 8 Garden Valley alternative segments 1, 2, 3, and 172 Garden Valley 6,000 559/12,224 No 8; Caliente common segment 2 – C – Caliente common segment 2 170 Penoyer Valley (Sand 4,000 14,461/11,888 Yes ALIENTE Spring Valley) Caliente common segment 2; South Reveille 173A Railroad Valley, 2,800 3,867/0 No alternative segments 2 and 3; Caliente common southern part R segment 3 AIL Caliente common segment 3 156 Hot Creek Valley 5,500 4,231/0 No A LIGNMENT Caliente common segment 3 149 Stone Cabin Valley 2,000 11,532/6,400 Yes Caliente common segment 3; Goldfield 141 Ralston Valley 6,000 4,330/1 Yes alternative segments 1, 3, and 4 Goldfield alternative segments 1 and 4 142 Alkali Spring Valley 3,000 2,596/0 No Goldfield alternative segments 1 and 3 145 Stonewall Flat 100 12/0 No DOE/EIS-0369 Table 3-35. Perennial yield and annual committed gro undwater resources of hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross (page 2 of 2). Annual committed groundwater Designated Hydrographic Perennial yield resources/pending annual groundwater Rail line segment areaa number Hydrographic area name (acre-feet)b,c groundwater duties (acre-feet)d basine Goldfield alternative segments 1, 3, and 4; 144 Lida Valley 350 72/0 No Caliente common segment 4; Bonnie Claire alternative segments 2 and 3 Bonnie Claire alternative segments 2, 3, and 5 146 Sarcobatus Flat 3,000 3,591/0 Yes Common segment 5; Oasis Valley alternative 228 Oasis Valley 1,000 1,299/0 Yes A segments 1 and 3; common segment 6 FFECTED Common segment 6 229 Crater Flat 220 1,147/82 No f f Common segment 6 227A Fortymile Canyon, 880 58 /5 No E Jackass Flats NVIRONMENT a. Source: DIRS 106094-Harrill, Gates, and Thomas 1988, Summary, Figure 3, with the proposed rail alignment map overlay. b. Source: DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, Regions 10, 13, and 14, except hydrographic areas 227A, 228, and 229, for which the source is DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12. The perennial yield value shown for area 228 is the lowest value in range of estimated values (1,000 to 2,000 acre-feet per year) presented by Thiel Engineering Consultants 1999. 3-178 5 – C – c. To convert acre-feet to cubic meters, multiply by 1,233.49.
Recommended publications

  • Family Resource Guide

    Resources Abortion/Birth Control/Female Healthcare Page # • A-Z Women's Center 892-0660 1 • Birth Control Care Center 1-800-255-7889, 733-7889 1 • First Choice Pregnancy Services 294-CARE, 737-ELLA 2 • Planned Parenthood Charleston - 878-7776 2 • Planned Parenthood E. Flamingo - 547-9888 2 • Planned Parenthood MLK Blvd. - 642-3313 2, 3 • Summit Family Planning 1-800-608-2630, 733-7889 3 • Women's Health Connection 1-877-385-2345 3, 4 • Women's Resource Center 366-1247 4 Adolescent & Children Services • Boys & Girls Clubs of Las Vegas 367-2582 5 • Boys Town 642-7070 5, 6 • Brooks Behavioral Health Center 570-5200 6 • HELP of Southern Nevada's Youth Center 385-3776 6 • Huntridge Teen Clinic 732-8776 7 • Helping Young People Experience Recovery (HYPER) 257-8199 7 Las Vegas Urban League: Child Care Subsidy Program • My Left Foot Children's Therapy 360-1137 7, 8 • National Runaway Hotline 1-800-786-2929 8 • Nevada Homes for Youth 380-2889 9 • Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth 1-888-907-7888, 1-866-UARESAFE 9 • St. Jude's Ranch for Children 294-7100 9, 10 • The Solutions FOUNDATION 485-2455 10 • Southern Nevada Child and Adolescent Services 486-6120 10 • Stepping Stones @ WestCare Women and Children's Campus 385-2020 or 24 hr hotline 385-3332 10, 11 • Street Teens 1-877-LV-TEENS, 809-3585 11 • Trevor Helpline 1-866-488-7386 11 • Voyage-Rancho @ WestCare Women and Children's Campus 385-2020 11, 12 • Young F.A.C.E.S. @ WestCare Women and Children's Campus 385-2020 ext.
  • Boulder City, Nevada Revenue Generating Analysis

    Boulder City, Nevada Revenue Generating Analysis

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones Spring 2008 Boulder City, Nevada revenue generating analysis Mayra A. Castro San Diego State University Dolores P. Leyva University of California - Santa Barbara Arnetta M. Meagher University of Nevada, Las Vegas Wade Zimmerman California State University - Fresno Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons, Other Business Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Repository Citation Castro, Mayra A.; Leyva, Dolores P.; Meagher, Arnetta M.; and Zimmerman, Wade, "Boulder City, Nevada revenue generating analysis" (2008). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 795. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2142773 This Capstone is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Capstone in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Capstone has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Boulder City, Nevada Revenue Generating Analysis Spring 2008 Mayra A. Castro Master of Public Administration Candidate Bachelor of Science in Applied Arts and Science, Criminal Justice Administration San Diego State University Dolores P.
  • Weiss Et Al, 1995) This Paper Disputes the Interpretation of Castor Et Al

    Weiss Et Al, 1995) This Paper Disputes the Interpretation of Castor Et Al

    EVALUATION OF THE GEOLOGIC RELATIONS AND SEISMOTECTONIC STABILITY OF THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN AREA NEVADA NUCLEAR WASTE SITE INVESTIGATION (NNWSI) PROGRESS REPORT 30 SEPTEMBER 1995 CENTER FOR NEOTECTONIC STUDIES MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO DISTRIBUTION OF ?H!S DOCUMENT IS UKLMTED DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document CONTENTS SECTION I. General Task Steven G. Wesnousky SECTION II. Task 1: Quaternary Tectonics John W. Bell Craig M. dePolo SECTION III. Task 3: Mineral Deposits Volcanic Geology Steven I. Weiss Donald C. Noble Lawrence T. Larson SECTION IV. Task 4: Seismology James N. Brune Abdolrasool Anooshehpoor SECTION V. Task 5: Tectonics Richard A. Schweickert Mary M. Lahren SECTION VI. Task 8: Basinal Studies Patricia H. Cashman James H. Trexler, Jr. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
  • Plate 1 117° 116°

    Plate 1 117° 116°

    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5175 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Energy Plate 1 117° 116° Monitor Range White River Valley Hot Creek Valley 5,577 (1,700) Warm Springs Railroad Valley 6 5,000 4,593 (1,400) Stone Cabin Valley Quinn Canyon Range Tonopah 5,577 (1,700) Ralston Valley NYE COUNTY 4,921 (1,500) LINCOLN COUNTY Big Smoky Valley 5,249 (1,600) 38° 38° 5,906 (1,800) 5,249 (1,600) Ralston Valley Coal Valley 5,249 (1,600) Kawich Range 4,265 (1,300) 4,921 (1,500) 5,249 (1,600) 6,234 (1,900) 5,577 (1,700) 4,921 (1,500) Railroad Valley South CACTUS FLAT 5,200 | 200 Cactus Range Penoyer Valley Goldfield 5,249 (1,600) 3,800 | 3,800 4,921 (1,500) Clayton Valley 3,609 (1,100) Rachel Sand Spring Valley 5,249 (1,600) 5,577 (1,700) Sarcobatus Flat North Kawich Valley 4,593 (1,400) 5,600 | 5,600 93 Pahranagat Valley 4,921 4,593 (1,400) 4,593 (1,400)5,249 3,937 (1,200)4,265 (1,300) Gold Flat Pahranagat Range 4,921 (1,500) Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley 6,300 | 5,900 Belted Range Alamo 4,265 (1,300) 4,593 (1,400) 3,609 (1,100) Scottys Emigrant Valley Junction Black Pahute Mesa Nevada National Mountain Security Site 3,281 (1,000) NYE COUNTY Sarcobatus Flat ESMERALDA COUNTY ESMERALDA Rainier Mesa 3,937 (1,200) Yucca Flat Timber Death Valley North Mountain 4,000 | 4,000 Yucca Flat Sarcobatus Flat South Oasis Valley subbasin Grapevine 37° 37° Springs area 1,900 | 1,900 4,265 Grapevine Mountains Bullfrog Hills 2,297 (700) 100 | 100 3,937 (1,200) Ash Meadows 20,50020,500 |
  • Las Vegas Aces

    Las Vegas Aces

    Welcome to LasVegasRelocation Guide to Southern Nevada Trusted everywhere every day. Contents LAS VEGAS VALLEY INFORMATION Climate & Population ......................................................4 Demographics ..................................................................5 Zip Code Map ..................................................................6 Newcomer Resources .......................................................7 Utility Information ...........................................................8 DMV/ Voting ....................................................................9 Employment ...................................................................10 Transportation ................................................................11 Housing ..........................................................................12 Museums/ Galleries .......................................................13 Libraries .........................................................................14 Hospitals ........................................................................15 Churches ........................................................................16 Youth Activities ..............................................................18 Senior Services ...............................................................19 Parks ...............................................................................20 Outdoor Recreation Activities ........................................21 Golfing ...........................................................................22
  • Crd Title P1.Ai

    Crd Title P1.Ai

    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This chapter describes the potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating a railroad along the Caliente rail alignment or the Mina rail alignment. An impact would be any change, positive or negative, from the existing (baseline) conditions described in Chapter 3 for each environmental resource area. The No-Action Alternative represents a continuation of baseline conditions. Glossary terms are shown in bold italics. DOE/EIS-0369D 4-1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1 Introduction This chapter begins with a description of impacts associated with the No-Action Alternative (Section 4.1.1). As Proposed Action: To determine a described in Section 2.3, under the No-Action Alternative, rail alignment within a rail corridor in which to construct and operate a the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) railroad to transport spent nuclear would not select a rail alignment or build a railroad within fuel, high-level radioactive waste, the Caliente rail corridor or the Mina rail corridor and and other materials from an existing would relinquish public lands withdrawn or segregated from railroad in Nevada to a repository at surface and mineral entry. The description of impacts Yucca Mountain, Nye County, associated with the No-Action Alternative applies to both Nevada. The Proposed Action rail corridors and all rail line alternative segments and includes the construction of railroad common segments. Section 4.1.2 introduces descriptions of construction and operations support impacts associated with the Proposed Action. facilities. This Rail Alignment EIS analyzes two Sections 4.2 and 4.3 describe potential impacts associated alternatives that would implement the with construction and operation of the proposed railroad Proposed Action: the Caliente rail along the Caliente rail alignment and the Mina rail alignment alignment and the Mina rail under the Proposed Action, including a Shared-Use Option.
  • Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis

    Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis

    1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively.
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada

    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada

    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988-B I 1 r^Hr-~"r-^S »:-«>'°-;>-.'; '£ '. -"* °-"^^io-'oO;ol!i-..e>L ^? :^~ty-":- o\: s--b>^.'d- .? " ? o..bTvo-r» ?:.-!:.»:-. "o'.-o'-o .- *^-o?.°:.--o : : ° o£\*>: ^-°:* '.« - "o-o- .-o - ^-.o.*'. ^» ' - 1 .". '. O- ' "" "- "* -" no: ^--'*^-o.yvo:»-c)^ - *>- : p.-by :o.;--p-/.-'o."-',c>-( 0 = ?.o'VO -V "±« -* «?'.<?o-oi ^ .. «- .*».-:»: -* ^^»-^ Chapter B Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada By DONLON O. HURTUBISE and EDWARD A. DU BRAY A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS EASTERN GREAT BASIN HARRY E. COOK AND CHRISTOPHER J. POTTER, Project Coordinators U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hurtubise, D.O. Stratigraphy and structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada / by Donlon O. Hurtubise and Edward A. du Bray, p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Eastern Great Basin ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1988-B) Includes bibliographical references.
  • Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA)

    Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA)

    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA) 1 2,3 4 5 4 5 1 GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 2 Greg A. Valentine , Joaquín A. Cortés , Elisabeth Widom , Eugene I. Smith , Christine Rasoazanamparany , Racheal Johnsen , Jason P. Briner , Andrew G. Harp1, and Brent Turrin6 doi:10.1130/GES01428.1 1Department of Geology, 126 Cooke Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA 2School of Geosciences, The Grant Institute, The Kings Buildings, James Hutton Road, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH 3FE, UK 3School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK 31 figures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental files 4Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 5Department of Geoscience, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA CORRESPONDENCE: gav4@ buffalo .edu 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 610 Taylor Road, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8066, USA CITATION: Valentine, G.A., Cortés, J.A., Widom, ABSTRACT some of the erupted magmas. The LCVF exhibits clustering in the form of E., Smith, E.I., Rasoazanamparany, C., Johnsen, R., Briner, J.P., Harp, A.G., and Turrin, B., 2017, overlapping and colocated monogenetic volcanoes that were separated by Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake The Lunar Crater volcanic field (LCVF) in central Nevada (USA) is domi­ variable amounts of time to as much as several hundred thousand years, but Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA): nated by monogenetic mafic volcanoes spanning the late Miocene to Pleisto­ without sustained crustal reservoirs between the episodes.
  • Structure and Devonian Stratigraphy of the Timpahute Range, Nevada

    Structure and Devonian Stratigraphy of the Timpahute Range, Nevada

    STRUCTURE AND DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF THE TIMPAHUTE RANGE, NEVADA Volume I by Alan K. Chamberlain © Copyright, 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date____________ Signed:__________________________ Alan K. Chamberlain Approved:__________________________ Dr. John E. Warme Professor and Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date____________ ____________________________________ Dr. Roger Slatt, Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Sequences of Devonian rocks are advantageously exposed along a unique 40- mile-long east-west traverse in the greater Timpahute Range, southeastern Nevada. Study of these rocks casts light upon Devonian paleogeography, the Devonian Antler orogeny, an Upper Devonian cosmolite impact basin, this part of the Cretaceous Sevier fold-and- thrust belt, and the effects of Cenozoic extension. The greater Timpahute Range lies within the Timpahute Range 30' X 60' quadrangle and includes the region from Tempiute Mountain on the west to the Pahroc Range on the east. Concealed major north-south trending normal faults caused by Cenozoic extension have been proposed to disrupt the Paleozoic rocks of the region. However, a structural interpretation using a new geologic map of the quadrangle requires no major north-south striking normal faults. Furthermore, the greater Timpahute Range is interpreted as a salient of stacked thrust sheets within the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt. The range is bounded on the north and south by thrust tear faults that may be related to basement fractures caused by the cosmolite impact. Evidence for the Late Devonian cosmolite impact includes shocked quartz, iridium anomalies, ejecta spherules, and disturbed shallowing-upward sequences exhibiting intrasequence folding, brecciation, carbonate liquefaction, and graded bedding.
  • 3.1-1 3.1 Introduction 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT How to Read

    3.1-1 3.1 Introduction 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT How to Read

    3.1 Introduction 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT How to Read Chapter 3.0 Chapter 3.0 provides background information on the various resources, resource uses, and programs managed by the Ely Field Office, and describes their existing conditions, trends, and current management. These subsections contain the following information: • Existing Conditions – description of each resource, resource use, or program. • Trends – description of the changes that are occurring in the existing conditions. • Current Management – description of how the Ely Field Office is currently managing the resource, resource use, or program. This format does not lend itself equally well to every resource, resource use, or program. Where a subsection is not applicable (e.g., trends for special designations), this is noted in the text. NEPA regulations require that an EIS contain a description of the environmental conditions that would be affected by the Proposed Action and alternatives. Thus rather than being encyclopedic, the Affected Environment chapter must focus on those resources and uses that would be impacted by the management direction presented in Chapter 2.0 for Alternatives A through E. The amount of quantitative information that is available to describe existing conditions and particularly trends varies from resource to resource. In general, resources that have formal administrative requirements, such as livestock grazing, have more quantitative information available than resources that are used casually, such as recreation. Where quantitative information is available, it is reflected in the existing conditions and trends descriptions. Where it is not available, the descriptions rely on the observational knowledge of the District developed by the Ely Field Office staff.
  • Geology of the Southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada

    Geology of the Southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-2008 Geology of the southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada Matthew Alan McKelvey University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Stratigraphy Commons, and the Volcanology Commons Repository Citation McKelvey, Matthew Alan, "Geology of the southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada" (2008). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3434676 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN REVEILLE RANGE, NYE COUNTY, NEVADA by Matthew Alan McKelvey Bachelor of Science Austin Peay State University 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master Degree of Science in Geoscience Department of Geoscience