DOCSLIB.ORG

Weiss Et Al, 1995) This Paper Disputes the Interpretation of Castor Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EVALUATION OF THE GEOLOGIC RELATIONS AND SEISMOTECTONIC STABILITY OF THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN AREA NEVADA NUCLEAR WASTE SITE INVESTIGATION (NNWSI) PROGRESS REPORT 30 SEPTEMBER 1995 CENTER FOR NEOTECTONIC STUDIES MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO DISTRIBUTION OF ?H!S DOCUMENT IS UKLMTED DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document CONTENTS SECTION I. General Task Steven G. Wesnousky SECTION II. Task 1: Quaternary Tectonics John W. Bell Craig M. dePolo SECTION III. Task 3: Mineral Deposits Volcanic Geology Steven I. Weiss Donald C. Noble Lawrence T. Larson SECTION IV. Task 4: Seismology James N. Brune Abdolrasool Anooshehpoor SECTION V. Task 5: Tectonics Richard A. Schweickert Mary M. Lahren SECTION VI. Task 8: Basinal Studies Patricia H. Cashman James H. Trexler, Jr. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. o SECTION I O o Annual Progress Report-—General Task Prepared by Steven G. Wesnousky October 1,1994 to September 30,1995 Introduction This report provides a summary of progress for the project "Evaluation of the Geologic Relations and Seismotectonic Stability of the Yucca Mountain Area, Nevada Nuclear Waste Site Investigation (NNWSI)." A similar report was previously provided for the period of 1 October 1993 to 30 September 1994. The report initially covers the activities of the General Task and is followed by sections that describe the progress of the other ongoing Tasks which are listed below. Task 1: Quaternary Tectonics Task 3: Mineral Deposits, Volcanic Geology Task 4: Seismology Task 5: Tectonics Task 8: Basinal Studies General Task Staff Steven G. Wesnousky, Project Director, Nina G. Krob, Administrative Assistant Administrative Activities The General Task continued the (1) coordination and oversight of the research of Tasks 1,3,5, and 8, the (2) oversight of budgets and (3) the collation and preparation of required monthly reports. As well, Dr. Wesnousky has continued to represent NWPO at meetings with the National Academy of Sciences, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Energy. Steven G. Wesnousky attended the following meetings and provided the following seminars for NWPO: January 26,1994, NRC/DOE Technical Exchange on Seismic Hazard Assessment and Seismic Design, Las Vegas, NV February 2-5,1995, NWPO field trip to examine faults in the Yucca block, precarious rocks, and the Rock Valley fault May 5-6,1995, Examine Crater Flat and Rock Valley Trenches. May 16-17,1995, NRC-DOE technical exchange atFOC, Yucca Mountain. June 15,1995, Technical Contractors Meeting at Carson City. 0.1 Technical Activities Projects Completed: Scaling Laws relating earthquake size, fault slip rate, and earthquake magnitude: This project was implemented in the preceding fiscal year, completed during this fiscal year, and submitted and accepted for publication this fiscal year. Estimation of the size of expected earthquakes along mapped faults is generally determined from empirically derived relationships between fault length and seismic moment or magnitude for historical earthquakes. There are numerous of these compilations, including a most recent by Wells and Coppersmith (BSSA, v.84,974-1003,1994). Many of these compilations and resulting regressions of earthquake size versus fault length tend to ignore an observation that has been in the seismological literature for some time, which is that the relationship of earthquake size versus rupture length in earthquakes is a function of the repeat time or fault slip rate on which the earthquake occurs (e.g. Scholz et al, BSSA, v. 76,65-70,1986; Kanamori and Allen, in Earthquake Source Mechanics, v. 6, 1985; Wesnousky, JGR, v. 91, 12,587-12,631, 1986). We show that slow slipping faults will generally produce a larger moment- magnitude earthquake man a faster slipping fault, by as much as .3 to .4 magnitude units when considering faults slipping at .01 to 10 mm/yr, respectively. Earthquake Frequency Statistics: Whether or not seismicity on a particular fault satisfies the Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution is important to seismic hazard analysis at Yucca Mountain. Study of the question is hampered by limited historical, geological, and instrumental data. We initially used a well-defined data set in southern California and extended the research to a global data set of faults to empirically examine the question. The results are published or now in press in Wesnousky (1994), Stirling et al, (1995), and Wesnousky (1995). Meetings and Abstracts: 1994 AGU Annual Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA Adams, K. D. and S. G. Wesnousky, Isostatic Rebound of the Pluvial Lake Lahontan Basin, Nevada and California: Progress Report, EOS supplement, Nov 1,1994, p.581. Kumamoto, T. and S. G. Wesnousky, Review of Japanese Paleoearthquake Data: Observations Bearing on the Characteristic of Earthquake Recurrence along Japanese Intraplate Faults, EOS supplement, Nov 1,1994, p. 452. Stirling, M., S. G. Wesnousky, and K. Shimazaki, Fault Trace Complexity, Cumulative Slip and the Shape of the Magnitude- Frequency Distribution fort Strike-Slip Faults: A Global Survey, EOS supplement, Nov 1,1994, p. 437. 1995 SSA Annual Meeting, El Paso, TX 0.2 Anderson, J. G., S. G. Wesnousky, M. W. Stirling, M. P. Sleeman, and T. Kumamoto, Regressions for Magnitude of Earthquakes incorporating fault slip rate as an independent parameter. 1995 Cordilleran Section of the Geological Society of America, Boise, Idaho. Adams, K. D., and S. G. Wesnousky, The age and synchroneity of the Highest Lake Lahontan Shoreline Features, Northwestern Nevada and Northeastern California. 1995 Int. Union. Quaternary Research (INQUA), 14th Congress, Aug 3-10, Berlin, 1995 Johnson, D. L., S. G. Wesnousky, and L. Abbott, Rapid, time-constrained pedogenesis and diagenesis following natural (1811-12 Earthquakes) and human-caused (1916 Watertable lowering) events, New Madrid Seismic Zone, Midcontinental USA. Wesnousky, S. G., Johnson, D. L., and L. Abbott, Paleosol and C-14 evidence for two pre-1811 large magnitude earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone, Midcontinental USA. 1995 Y. M. Goldschmidt Conference, Penn State University, University Park, PA. May 24-26 Johnson, D. L., and S. G. Wesnousky, Origins and ages of iron concretions formed in sand, New Madrid seismic zone, Midcontinental USA. Publications Wesnousky, S. G., The Gutenberg-Richter or Characteristic Earthquake Distribution, Which is it? (1994) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84,1940-1959. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (Contributor), Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 (1995), Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85,379-439. Kumamoto, T., S. G. Wesnousky, M. Okamura, H. Tsutsumi, N. Chida, K. Shimazaki, and T. Nakata (1995), Active Faults in Lake Tahoe, Western Part of the United States-a Preliminary Report, Active Fault Research, v. 13,47-53. Caskey, S. J., S. G. Wesnousky, P. Zhang, and D. B. Slemmons, Surface Faulting and Mechanical Aspects of the 1954 Fairview Peak (Ms = 7.2) and Dixie Valley (Ms=6.9) Earthquakes, Central Nevada, accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Caskey, S. J., Geometric relations of dip slip to a faulted ground surface: new nomograms for estimating components of fault displacement, Journal of Structural Geology, 17,1197-1202,1995. 0.3 Anderson, J. G., S. G. Wesnousky, M. W. Stirling, M. P. Sleeman, and T. Kumamoto, Earthquake Size as a Function of Fault Slip Rate, submitted to Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Stirling, M. W., S. G. Wesnousky, Fault trace complexity, cumulative slip, and the shape of the magnitude-frequency distribution for strike-slip faults: a global survey, accepted for publication in the Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. Hirabayashi, C. K., T. K. Rockwell, S. G. Wesnousky, M. W. Stirling, and F. Suarez-Vidal, A Neotectonic Study of the San Miguel- Vallecito fault, Baja California, Mexico, accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 0.4 o SECTION II O o TASK1 QUATERNARY TECTONICS PROGRESS REPORT 1 October 1994 to 30 September 1995 John W. Bell Principal Investigator Craig M. dePolo Co-Investigator SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD During the contract period, the following activities were conducted by Task 1: ** J.W. Bell completed and published with F.F. Peterson, R.I. Dorn, A.R. Ramelli, and T.L. Ku the paper "Late Quaternary geomorphology and soils in Crater Flat, Yucca Mountain area, southern Nevada" in the Geological Society
Recommended publications
  • Argyrodite Ag8ges6 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1

    Argyrodite Ag8ges6 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1

    Argyrodite Ag8GeS6 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic, pseudocubic. Point Group: mm2. Pseudo-octahedra, dodecahedra, cubes, or as combinations of these forms, in crystals as large as 18 cm. Also radiating crystal aggregates, botryoidal crusts, or massive. Twinning: Pseudospinel law {111}; repeated interpenetration twins of pseudododecahedra on {111}. Physical Properties: Fracture: Uneven to slightly conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 2.5–3 VHN = n.d. D(meas.) = 6.29 D(calc.) = 6.32 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Steel-gray with a red tint, tarnishes black; in polished section, gray-white with a violet tint. Streak: Gray-black. Luster: Strong metallic. Pleochroism: Very weak. Anisotropism: Weak. R1–R2: (400) 28.9–29.5, (420) 27.9–28.5, (440) 27.1–27.7, (460) 26.3–26.9, (480) 25.8–26.3, (500) 25.3–25.8, (520) 25.0–25.4, (540) 24.7–25.2, (560) 24.6–25.0, (580) 24.5–24.9, (600) 24.4–24.9, (620) 24.5–24.8, (640) 24.6–24.9, (660) 24.5–24.9, (680) 24.6–25.0, (700) 24.7–25.0 Cell Data: Space Group: Pna21. a = 15.149(1) b = 7.476(2) c = 10.589(1) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Machacamarca, Bolivia. 3.02 (100), 1.863 (50), 2.66 (40), 3.14 (30), 2.44 (30), 2.03 (30), 1.784 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) Ag 75.78 74.20 76.51 Fe 0.68 Ge 3.65 4.99 6.44 Sn 3.60 3.36 Sb trace trace S 16.92 16.45 17.05 Total 99.95 99.68 100.00 (1) Chocaya, Bolivia.
  • 95-289, "Origins of Secondary Silica with Yucca Mountain, Nye

    95-289, "Origins of Secondary Silica with Yucca Mountain, Nye

    ORIGINS OF SECONDARY SILICA WITHIN YUCCA MOUNTAIN, NYE COUNTY, SOUTHWESTERN NEVADA by Richard J. Moscati and Joseph F. Whelan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 95-289 Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-92NV1 0874 Denver, Colorado 1996 CONTENTS A b stract ................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................................I Introduction ......................................... ,...............,......................................,.................................;...................................... ....... I A cknow ledgm ents ................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................I Geologic setting .............................................................................................................................. 3 Silica and calcite petrology ................................................................................................................................................... ..........................................3 Analytical methods ........................................................................................................................... 5 Discussion of origins of silica ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Plate 1 117° 116°

    Plate 1 117° 116°

    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5175 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Energy Plate 1 117° 116° Monitor Range White River Valley Hot Creek Valley 5,577 (1,700) Warm Springs Railroad Valley 6 5,000 4,593 (1,400) Stone Cabin Valley Quinn Canyon Range Tonopah 5,577 (1,700) Ralston Valley NYE COUNTY 4,921 (1,500) LINCOLN COUNTY Big Smoky Valley 5,249 (1,600) 38° 38° 5,906 (1,800) 5,249 (1,600) Ralston Valley Coal Valley 5,249 (1,600) Kawich Range 4,265 (1,300) 4,921 (1,500) 5,249 (1,600) 6,234 (1,900) 5,577 (1,700) 4,921 (1,500) Railroad Valley South CACTUS FLAT 5,200 | 200 Cactus Range Penoyer Valley Goldfield 5,249 (1,600) 3,800 | 3,800 4,921 (1,500) Clayton Valley 3,609 (1,100) Rachel Sand Spring Valley 5,249 (1,600) 5,577 (1,700) Sarcobatus Flat North Kawich Valley 4,593 (1,400) 5,600 | 5,600 93 Pahranagat Valley 4,921 4,593 (1,400) 4,593 (1,400)5,249 3,937 (1,200)4,265 (1,300) Gold Flat Pahranagat Range 4,921 (1,500) Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley 6,300 | 5,900 Belted Range Alamo 4,265 (1,300) 4,593 (1,400) 3,609 (1,100) Scottys Emigrant Valley Junction Black Pahute Mesa Nevada National Mountain Security Site 3,281 (1,000) NYE COUNTY Sarcobatus Flat ESMERALDA COUNTY ESMERALDA Rainier Mesa 3,937 (1,200) Yucca Flat Timber Death Valley North Mountain 4,000 | 4,000 Yucca Flat Sarcobatus Flat South Oasis Valley subbasin Grapevine 37° 37° Springs area 1,900 | 1,900 4,265 Grapevine Mountains Bullfrog Hills 2,297 (700) 100 | 100 3,937 (1,200) Ash Meadows 20,50020,500 |
  • Board of County Phone (775) 482-8191 Fax (775) 751-7093 Comnussioners

    Board of County Phone (775) 482-8191 Fax (775) 751-7093 Comnussioners

    Pahrump Office Tonopah Office Nye County Govermnent Center Nye County Courthouse 2100 F. Walt Williams Dove William P. Beko Justice Facility Suite 100 P0 Box 153 Palmimp, NV 89048 Tonopah, NV 89049 Phone (775) 751-7075 Board of County Phone (775) 482-8191 Fax (775) 751-7093 Comnussioners. Fax (775) 482-8198 Nye County, Nevada April 30, 2019 The Honorable John Barrasso The Honorable Thomas R. Carper Chairman, Committee on Environment and Ranking Member, Committee on Public Works Environment and Public Works 410 Dirksen Senate Office Building 456 Dirksen Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear: Chairman Barrasso and Ranking Member Carper: On behalf of the Nye County Conmiission, along with eight other Nevada counties (out of a total of seventeen) I strongly urge you to support the Senate bill to jump start the licensing hearing for the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository. This position is in accordance with the law, supports the objective scientific studies on the safety of the repository and has the support of local governments in Nevada. It is the right thing to do. As you know, funding for the license process has been denied for nine years on purely political grounds. The overwhelming body of scientific studies done on the proposed repository have demonstrated that it can be built and operated safely. This includes the safety reviews done by the professionals at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Further, the funding we are requesting will be used to conduct further scientific reviews by the NRC. The opponents of the repository will have every opportunity to show that the repository is unsafe, if they can make that case based on facts.
  • Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P

    Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P

    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas.
  • OR Get the Facts About YUCCA MOUNTAIN

    OR Get the Facts About YUCCA MOUNTAIN

    Where is Yucca Mountain? Yucca Mountain is the only site being Yucca Mountain is located in Nevada, about an considered by the Department of Energy hour northwest of Las Vegas. It is in the desert, (DOE) as a “permanent disposal” site for the and the land it occupies includes public land, United States’ highly radioactive nuclear Nevada Test Site land, and Nellis Air Force Base waste. This spent nuclear fuel and high-level land. However, all of this land is part of the waste is currently located at 77 sites across the For more information, contact: Western Shoshone traditional homelands. If a country and would have to be transported by dump is built at Yucca Mountain, the Shoshone truck or rail to Yucca Mountain if that site is will lose access to this sacred place. approved as a geologic repository. Public Citizen’s Critical Mass Energy Under current law, 70,000 metric tons and Environment Program of waste would be allowed to be stored at 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Yucca Mountain, with 63,000 tons of that Washington, DC 20003 being commercial waste and the rest being www.citizen.org/cmep DOE waste. However, that still would not 202-546-4996 OREGON IDAHOIDAHO accommodate all the waste projected to be 202-547-7392 (fax) Get the Facts about Washoe produced in the U.S. (an estimated 107,500 County Humboldt metric tons of both commercial and DOE County YUCCA Elko County waste). OR Scientific study at Yucca Mountain has MOUNTAIN, Pershing revealed a host of potential problems at the RenoReno County Lander Nuclear Information County Eureka site.
  • The Initiation and Evolution of Ignimbrite Faults, Gran Canaria, Spain

    The Initiation and Evolution of Ignimbrite Faults, Gran Canaria, Spain

    The initiation and evolution of ignimbrite faults, Gran Canaria, Spain Aisling Mary Soden B.A. (Hons.), Trinity College Dublin Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) University of Glasgow Department of Geographical & Earth Sciences January 2008 © Aisling M. Soden, 2008 Abstract Abstract Understanding how faults initiate and fault architecture evolves is central to predicting bulk fault zone properties such as fault zone permeability and mechanical strength. The study of faults at the Earth’s surface and at near-surface levels is significant for the development of high level nuclear waste repositories, and CO2 sequestration facilities. Additionally, with growing concern over water resources, understanding the impact faults have on contaminant transport between the unsaturated and saturated zone has become increasingly important. The proposal of a high-level nuclear waste repository in the tuffs of Yucca Mountain, Nevada has stimulated interest into research on the characterisation of brittle deformation in non-welded to densely welded tuffs and the nature of fluid flow in these faults and fractures. The majority of research on the initiation and development of faults has focussed on shear faults in overall compressional stress regimes. Dilational structures have been examined in compressional settings e.g. overlapping faults generating extensional oversteps, or in normal faults cutting mechanical layered stratigraphy. Previous work has shown the affect mechanical stratigraphy has on fault dip angle; competent layers have steeply dipping segments and less competent layers have shallowly dipping segments. Displacement is accommodated by shear failure of the shallow segments and hybrid failure of the steeply dipping segments. As the fault walls of the shear failure segment slip past each other the walls of the hybrid failure segment are displaced horizontally as well as vertically thus forming dilation structures such as pull-aparts or extensional bends.
  • European Journal of Mineralogy

    European Journal of Mineralogy

    Title Grundmannite, CuBiSe<SUB>2</SUB>, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragón mine, Potosí, Bolivia Authors Förster, Hans-Jürgen; Bindi, L; Stanley, Christopher Date Submitted 2016-05-04 European Journal of Mineralogy Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: Article Type: Research paper Full Title: Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia Short Title: Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, Corresponding Author: Hans-Jürgen Förster Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam, GERMANY Corresponding Author E-Mail: [email protected] Order of Authors: Hans-Jürgen Förster Luca Bindi Chris J. Stanley Abstract: Grundmannite, ideally CuBiSe2, is a new mineral species from the El Dragόn mine, Department of Potosí, Bolivia. It is either filling small shrinkage cracks or interstices in brecciated kruta'ite−penroseite solid solutions or forms independent grains in the matrix. Grain size of the anhedral to subhedral crystals is usually in the range 50−150 µm, but may approach 250 µm. Grundmannite is usually intergrown with watkinsonite and clausthalite; other minerals occasionally being in intimate grain-boundary contact comprise quartz, dolomite, native gold, eskebornite, umangite, klockmannite, Co-rich penroseite, and three unnamed phases of the Cu−Bi−Hg−Pb−Se system, among which is an as-yet uncharacterizedspecies with the ideal composition Cu4Pb2HgBi4Se11. Eldragόnite and petrovicite rarely precipitated in the neighborhood of CuBiSe2. Grundmannite is non-fluorescent, black and opaque with a metallic luster and black streak.
  • Evidence from Lake City Caldera, USA GEOSPHERE

    Evidence from Lake City Caldera, USA GEOSPHERE

    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Controls on hydrothermal fluid flow in caldera-hosted settings: Evidence from Lake City caldera, USA 1 1 1 2 3 GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 6 Thomas O. Garden , Darren M. Gravley , Ben M. Kennedy , Chad Deering , and Isabelle Chambefort 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 2 doi:10.1130/GES01506.1 Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, USA 3GNS Science, Wairakei Research Centre, Taupo 3377, New Zealand 10 figures; 3 tables ABSTRACT tion thereof (Table 1). It is not well understood why some calderas host hydro- CORRESPONDENCE: thermal systems while others do not or what factors promote fluid localization thomas .o .garden@gmail .com Silicic caldera volcanoes are often associated with hydrothermal systems in certain parts of a caldera. In particular, caldera “ring faults” are commonly economically important for electricity generation and localization of ore de- suggested to be important structures for localizing fluid flow (e.g., Duex and CITATION: Garden, T.O., Gravley, D.M., Kennedy, B.M., Deering, C., and Chambefort, I., 2017, Controls posits. Despite their potential importance, the poor exposure that is typical in Henry, 1981; Wood, 1994; Guillou-Frottier et al., 2000; Stix et al., 2003; Kissling on hydrothermal fluid flow in caldera-hosted settings: caldera settings has limited the number of detailed studies of the relationship and Weir, 2005); yet no studies to date have focused on a thorough examina- Evidence from Lake City caldera, USA: Geosphere, between caldera structures and fluid flow. We use field mapping, outcrop scale tion of their permeability structure.
  • Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4267 Prepared In

    Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4267 Prepared In

    HYDROLOGY OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN AND VICINITY, NEVADA-CALIFORNIA- INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS THROUGH MID-1983 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4267 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HYDROLOGY OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN AND VICINITY, NEVADA-CALIFORNIA- INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS THROUGH MID-1983 By R. K. Waddell, 0. H. Robison, and R. K. Blankennagel U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4267 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Denver, Colorado 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Chief, Nuclear Hydrology Program Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey Central Region Box 25425, Federal Center Box 25046, Mail Stop 416 Denver, CO 80225 Denver Federal Center Telephone: (303) 236-7476 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract. ............................... 1 Introduction. ............................. 2 Purpose and scope. ........................ 2 Physiographic and geologic setting ................ 4 Surface-water hydrology ........................ 5 Stream characteristics ...................... 5 Flood potential. ......................... 6 Regional ground-water hydrology .................... 16 Hydrogeologic units. ....................... 16 Lower clastic aquitard. ................... 25 Lower carbonate aquifer ..................
  • 2018 Resource and Reserves

    2018 Resource and Reserves

    Resources & Reserves as at 31 December 2018 Contents Page number About this report 2 Definitions 4 Metals and Minerals: Copper 5 Zinc 17 Nickel 34 Ferroalloys 38 Aluminium/Alumina 42 Iron ore 43 Energy Products: Coal 47 Oil 66 About this report We report our resources and reserves in accordance with the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code), the 2016 edition of the South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (SAMREC), the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves (2014 edition) and the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) for reporting oil and natural gas Reserves and Resources. Overview Nickel The resource and reserve data in the following tables are The Canadian and New Caledonian Mineral Resources as at 31 December 2018, unless otherwise noted. For and Mineral Reserves estimates are prepared in comparison purposes, data for 2017 has been included. accordance with the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by CIM Council Metric units are used throughout. on 10 May 2014, and the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines, All data is presented on a 100% asset basis, with the adopted by CIM Council on 23 November 2003, and have Glencore attributable percentage shown against each been compiled using geo-statistical and/or classical asset, with the exception of Oil assets which are shown on methods, plus economic and mining parameters a working interest basis. appropriate to each project.
  • Amargosa Desert Hydrographic Basin 14-230

    Amargosa Desert Hydrographic Basin 14-230

    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES JASON KING, P.E. STATE ENGINEER AMARGOSA DESERT HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN 14-230 GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE INVENTORY WATER YEAR 2015 Field Investigated by: Tracy Geter Report Prepared by: Tracy Geter TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 1 HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN SUMMARY ................................................................................... 2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE .............................................................................................................. 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .................................................................................. 3 GROUNDWATER LEVELS ....................................................................................................... 3 METHODS TO ESTIMATE PUMPAGE .................................................................................. 4 PUMPAGE BY MANNER OF USE ........................................................................................... 5 TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 6 FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX A. AMARGOSA DESERT 2015 GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE BY APPLICATION NUMBER ...........................................................................................