Fourmile East SEZ Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fourmile East SEZ Analysis 1 10.3 FOURMILE EAST 2 3 4 10.3.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 10.3.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Fourmile East SEZ has a total area of 3,882 acres (15.7 km2) and is located 10 in Alamosa County in south-central Colorado (Figure 10.3.1.1-1). In 2008, the county population 11 was 15,783, while the four-county region surrounding the SEZ—Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, and 12 Rio Grande Counties—had a total population of 39,759. The largest nearby town is Alamosa, 13 with an estimated 2008 population of 8,745, which is located about 13 mi (21 km) to the west on 14 U.S. 160. This highway lies about 0.6 mi (1 km) south of the SEZ, while CO 150 runs north- 15 south through the eastern portion of the SEZ; Great Sands Dunes National Park is located about 16 9 mi (14 km) north of the SEZ on CO 150. The SLRG Railroad serves the area. The nearest 17 public airport is San Luis Valley Regional Airport located 12 mi (19 km) west of the SEZ in 18 Alamosa. Santa Fe, New Mexico, lies about 120 mi (193 km) to the south, and Denver, 19 Colorado, lies about 170 mi (31 km) to the northeast. 20 21 An existing 69-kV transmission line lies about 2 mi (3 km) to the south, and a 230-kV 22 line lies about 8 mi (13 km) to the north of the SEZ. It is assumed that a new transmission line 23 would be needed to provide access from the SEZ to the transmission grid (see Section 10.3.1.2). 24 As of February 2010, there were no pending solar project applications on the SEZ. 25 26 The proposed Fourmile East SEZ lies in the eastern San Luis Valley, part of the San Luis 27 Basin, a high-elevation (approximately 8,000 ft [2,440 m]) basin between two large mountain 28 ranges. The San Juan Mountains to the west and the Sangre de Cristo Range to the east form the 29 rim of the basin. The proposed SEZ lies on a flat alluvial fan formed in the basin. There are no 30 developments on the land, which is currently used for grazing, nor is there any standing surface 31 water. Scrubland vegetation reflects the arid climate, which produces an annual average rainfall 32 of about 8 in (20 cm). Large groundwater reserves underlie the area in several aquifers. Little 33 commercial or industrial activity exists in the surrounding area, while some agricultural areas lie 34 to the southeast. 35 36 The proposed Fourmile East SEZ and other relevant information are shown in 37 Figure 10.3.1.1-1. The criteria used to identify the SEZ as an appropriate location for solar 38 energy development included proximity to existing transmission lines or designated corridors, 39 proximity to existing roads, a slope of generally less than 2%, and an area of more than 40 2,500 acres (10 km2). In addition, the area was identified as being relatively free of other types 41 of conflicts, such as USFWS-designated critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, 42 ACECs, SRMAs, and NLCS lands (see Section 2.2.2.2 for the complete list of exclusions). 43 Although these classes of restricted lands were excluded from the proposed Fourmile East SEZ, 44 other restrictions may be appropriate. The analyses in the following sections address the affected 45 environment and potential impacts associated with utility-scale solar energy development in the 46 proposed SEZ for important environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic resources. Draft Solar PEIS 10.3-1 December 2010 1 2 FIGURE 10.3.1.1-1 Proposed Fourmile East SEZ Draft Solar PEIS 10.3-2 December 2010 1 10.3.1.2 Development Assumptions for the Impact Analysis 2 3 Maximum development of the proposed Fourmile East SEZ was assumed to be 80% of 4 the total SEZ area over a period of 20 years, a maximum of 3,105 acres (12.6 km2). These values 5 are shown in Table 10.3.1.2-1, along with other development assumptions. Full development of 6 the Fourmile East SEZ would allow development of facilities with an estimated total of 345 MW 7 of electrical power capacity if power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies were used, 8 assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required, and an estimated 621 MW of power if 9 solar trough technologies were used, assuming 5 acres/MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. 10 11 Availability of electric transmission facilities from SEZs to load centers will be an 12 important consideration for future development in SEZs. For the proposed Fourmile East SEZ, 13 the nearest existing transmission line is a 69-kV line 2 mi (3.2 km) of the SEZ. It is possible that 14 a new transmission line could be constructed from the SEZ to this existing line, but the 69-kV 15 capacity of that line would be inadequate for 345 to 621 MW of new capacity (note: a 500-kV 16 line can approximately accommodate the load of one 700-MW facility). At full build-out 17 capacity, it is clear that substantial new transmission and/or upgrades of existing transmission 18 lines would be required to bring electricity from the proposed Fourmile East SEZ to load centers; 19 however, at this time the location and size of such new transmission facilities are unknown. 20 Generic impacts of transmission and associated infrastructure construction and of line upgrades 21 on various resources are discussed in Chapter 5. Project-specific analyses would need 22 23 TABLE 10.3.1.2-1 Proposed Fourmile East SEZ—Assumed Development Acreages, Maximum Solar MW Output, Access Roads, and Transmission Line ROWs Distance and Assumed Distance to Capacity of Distance to Total Acreage Maximum SEZ Nearest Nearest Assumed Area Nearest and Assumed Output for State, U.S., Existing of Transmission BLM-Designated Developed Acreage Various Solar or Interstate Transmission Line ROW and Transmission (80% of total) Technologies Highway Line Road ROW Corridore 3,882 acres and 345 MWb Adjacent 2 mid and 61 acres and Adjacent/ 3,105 acresa 621 MWc (CO 150) 69 kV 0 acres Throughf a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. b Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using power tower, dish engine, or PV technologies, assuming 9 acres/MW (0.04 km2/MW) of land required. c Maximum power output if the SEZ were fully developed using solar trough technologies, assuming 5 acres/MW MW (0.02 km2/MW) of land required. d To convert mi to km, multiply by 1.609. e BLM-designated corridors are developed for federal land use planning purposes only and are not applicable to state-owned or privately owned land. f A BLM locally designated corridor covers the entire proposed Fourmile East SEZ. 24 Draft Solar PEIS 10.3-3 December 2010 1 to identify the specific impacts of new transmission construction and line upgrades for any 2 projects proposed within the SEZ. 3 4 To provide as complete an analysis of impacts of solar development in the SEZ as 5 possible, it was assumed that, at a minimum, a transmission line segment would be constructed 6 from the proposed Fourmile East SEZ to the nearest existing transmission line in order to 7 connect the SEZ to the transmission grid. This assumption was made without information on 8 whether the nearest existing transmission line would actually be available for connection of 9 future solar facilities, and without assumptions about upgrades of the line. Establishing a 10 connection to the line closest to the Fourmile East SEZ would involve the construction of about 11 2 mi (3.2 km) of new transmission line outside of the SEZ. The ROW for this transmission line 12 would occupy approximately 61 acres (0.25 km2) of land, assuming a 250-ft (76-m) wide ROW, 13 a typical width for such a ROW. If a connecting transmission line were constructed to a different 14 location in the future, site developers would need to determine the impacts from construction 15 and operation of that line. In addition, developers would need to determine the impacts of line 16 upgrades if they were needed. 17 18 Existing road access to the proposed Fourmile East SEZ should be adequate to support 19 construction and operation of solar facilities, because CO 150 runs within the eastern boundary 20 and U.S. 160 runs less than 1 mi (2 km) to the south of the SEZ. Thus, no additional road 21 construction outside of the SEZ is assumed to be required to support solar development, as 22 summarized in Table 10.3.1.2-1. 23 24 25 10.3.1.3 Summary of Major Impacts and Proposed SEZ-Specific Design Features 26 27 In this section, the impacts and proposed SEZ-specific design features assessed in 28 Sections 10.3.2 through 10.3.21 for the proposed Fourmile East SEZ are summarized in 29 tabular form. Table 10.3.1.3-1 is a comprehensive list of impacts discussed in these sections; 30 the reader may reference the applicable sections for detailed support of the impact assessment. 31 Section 10.3.22 discusses potential cumulative impacts from solar energy development in the 32 proposed SEZ. 33 34 Only those design features that are specific to the Fourmile East SEZ are included 35 in Sections 10.3.2 through 10.3.21 and in the summary table.
Recommended publications
  • Kern County, California
    2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Matt Hagemann · Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: [email protected] August 22, 2012 Gideon Kracov Attorney at Law 801 S. Grand Ave, llu' Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Comments on the Beacon Photovoltaic Project Dear Mr. Kracov: We have reviewed the July 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"i for the Beacon Photovoltaic Project ("Project"). The Project proposes to build a 250-megawatt solar generation facility on approximately 3.6 square miles of land four miles north of California City in Kern County, California. Project components include: • A photovoltaic (PV) solar power generation facllity containing approximately 972,000 panels; • 230 ki lovolt overhead transmission line; • Operations and maintenance building, parking lot, office, and sewer system; and • Access roads (DEIR, p. 3-9). We have reviewed the DEIR for issues associated with air quality, hydrology and water quality, and ha za rds and hazardous materials. The DEIR fails to adequately disclose potentially significa nt impacts from Project constru.ction on workers and offsite r eceptors. A revised DEIR needs to be prepared to adequately disclose and analyze these impacts and provide mitigation, if necessary.· Air Quality The Project is located in t he Eastern Kern Air Pollution Cont rol District ("EKAPCD") and the M ojave Desert Air Basin ("MOAB"). Both the EKAPCD and t he M DAB are designated non-attainment for PMlO (DEIR, pp. 4.2-3, 22). Significant emlssion.s of P:MlO and its contributing sources, such as NOx, will lead 1 to a worsening of regional air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage Development Plan
    Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Energy Storage Development Plan Grid Planning and Development System Studies and Research Group September 2, 2014 This space is intentionally left blank Table of Contents: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 B. Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 1 C. Energy Storage Targets ........................................................................................... 1 1. Overview and Policy ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 B. Background ............................................................................................................. 3 C. ES Regulation, Policy, and Legislative Impacts ..................................................... 5 2. Scope & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Storage System Development Strategy ...................................................... 6 B. Energy Storage System Target Development Schedule ......................................... 6 3. Description of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • SYMBOLS a B C ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd entertainment 206-7 travel within 128-9 384 festivals & events 200-1 walking tours 112 food 203-5 Boulder Creek Festival 25, 114 internet access 207 Breckenridge 34, 169-79, 170 medical services 207 accommodations 175-6 shopping 207 activities 172-4 sights 194-5 courses 174-5 tourist information 208 drinking 177-8 travel to/from 208 entertainment 178-9 travel within 208 festivals & events 175 Aspen Music Festival 25, 201 food 176-7 ATMs 373 history 169, 178 shopping 179 SYMBOLS sights 169-72 ‘14ers’ 12, 31, see also mountains B tourist information 179 & peaks Bachelor Loop 285 tours 174-5 internet resources 19 backpacking, see hiking Bailey 220-1 travel to/from 179 Basalt 209-10 travel within 179 A bears 363 Breckenridge Spring Massive 24 accommodations 368-70 Beaver Creek 191-4 brewpubs, see microbreweries activities 31-8, see also individual Buck, Ken 347 activities beer 6, 22, see also microbreweries budget 18 air travel Coors Brewery 96 Buena Vista 217-20 to/from Colorado 375-6 festivals 25-6, 67, 266, 278 Buffalo Bill 96 within Colorado 376 Bennett, Michael 347 bus travel Alamosa 311-13 Bent, Charles 341, 353 to/from Colorado 376 amusement parks Bent, William 341, 353 within Colorado 377 Elitch Gardens 63 Bent’s Old Fort National Historic Site 341 business hours 370 Glenwood Caverns Adventure Park 238 Biber, Stanley 340 Peak 8 Fun Park 173-4 bicycle travel, see cycling & C mountain biking Royal Gorge Bridge & Amusement Cache la Poudre River 151 Big Sweep 61 Park 334 camping 368-9 bighorn sheep
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis
    1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations 1 5
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Colorado Parks and Wildlife CHAPTER P-1 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS 2 CCR 405-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS AND WATERS #100 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS a. "Parks and Outdoor Recreation Lands" shall mean, whenever used throughout these regulations, all parks and outdoor recreation lands and waters under the administration and jurisdiction of the Division of Parks and Wildlife. b. It shall be prohibited: 1. To enter, use or occupy Parks and Outdoor Recreation Lands when same are posted against such entry, use or occupancy. (Access to Parks and Outdoor Recreation lands and waters is generally allowed between 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily. Restricted access generally will be allowed during other hours for camping and fishing.) 2. To remove, destroy, mutilate, modify or deface any structure, water control device, poster, notice, sign or marker, tree, shrub or other plant or vegetation, including dead timber and forest litter, or any object of archaeological, geological, historical, zoological or natural/environmental value or interest on Parks and Outdoor Recreation Lands. (This regulation does not include removal of firewood from designated firewood areas, noxious weeds as defined by statute, or recreational gold mining within the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area, except where prohibited as indicated by posted signs.) 3. To remove, destroy or harass any wildlife or livestock on Parks and Outdoor Recreation Lands. (Hunting will be allowed in areas designated by the Division during hunting seasons.) CAMPING 4.
    [Show full text]
  • De Tilla Gulch SEZ Analysis
    1 10.2 DE TILLA GULCH 2 3 4 10.2.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 10.2.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ has a total area of 1,522 acres (6.2 km2) and is 10 located in Saguache County in south-central Colorado (Figure 10.2.1.1-1). In 2008, the county 11 population was 6,903, while the four-county region surrounding the SEZ—Alamosa, Chafee, 12 Saguache, and Rio Grande Counties—had a total population of 51,974. The largest nearby town, 13 which is located about 50 mi (80 km) to the south, is Alamosa with a 2008 population of 8,745. 14 The village of Saguache is located about 8 mi (12 km) west of the SEZ on U.S. 285, which runs 15 along the northwest side of the SEZ. The SLRG Railroad serves the area. The nearest public 16 airport is the Saguache Municipal Airport near the town of Saguache. Santa Fe, New Mexico, 17 lies about 160 mi (257 km) to the south, and Denver, Colorado, is located about 130 mi (209 km) 18 to the northeast. 19 20 An existing 115-kV transmission line is accessible to the SEZ. It is assumed that an 21 existing transmission line could potentially provide access from the SEZ to the transmission grid 22 (see Section 10.2.1.2). There were no pending solar project applications within the SEZ as of 23 February 2010. 24 25 The proposed De Tilla Gulch SEZ lies in the northwestern portion of the San Luis Valley, 26 part of the San Luis Basin, a large, high-elevation, basin within the Rocky Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Tribe CICHORIEAE 菊苣族 Ju Ju Zu Shi Zhu (石铸 Shih Chu), Ge Xuejun (葛学军); Norbert Kilian, Jan Kirschner, Jan Štěpánek, Alexander P
    Published online on 25 October 2011. Shi, Z., Ge, X. J., Kilian, N., Kirschner, J., Štěpánek, J., Sukhorukov, A. P., Mavrodiev, E. V. & Gottschlich, G. 2011. Cichorieae. Pp. 195–353 in: Wu, Z. Y., Raven, P. H. & Hong, D. Y., eds., Flora of China Volume 20–21 (Asteraceae). Science Press (Beijing) & Missouri Botanical Garden Press (St. Louis). 5. Tribe CICHORIEAE 菊苣族 ju ju zu Shi Zhu (石铸 Shih Chu), Ge Xuejun (葛学军); Norbert Kilian, Jan Kirschner, Jan Štěpánek, Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Evgeny V. Mavrodiev, Günter Gottschlich Annual to perennial, acaulescent, scapose, or caulescent herbs, more rarely subshrubs, exceptionally scandent vines, latex present. Leaves alternate, frequently rosulate. Capitulum solitary or capitula loosely to more densely aggregated, sometimes forming a secondary capitulum, ligulate, homogamous, with 3–5 to ca. 300 but mostly with a few dozen bisexual florets. Receptacle naked, or more rarely with scales or bristles. Involucre cylindric to campanulate, ± differentiated into a few imbricate outer series of phyllaries and a longer inner series, rarely uniseriate. Florets with 5-toothed ligule, pale yellow to deep orange-yellow, or of some shade of blue, including whitish or purple, rarely white; anthers basally calcarate and caudate, apical appendage elongate, smooth, filaments smooth; style slender, with long, slender branches, sweeping hairs on shaft and branches; pollen echinolophate or echinate. Achene cylindric, or fusiform to slenderly obconoidal, usually ribbed, sometimes compressed or flattened, apically truncate, attenuate, cuspi- date, or beaked, often sculptured, mostly glabrous, sometimes papillose or hairy, rarely villous, sometimes heteromorphic; pappus of scabrid [to barbellate] or plumose bristles, rarely of scales or absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Strategies to Improve Effectiveness in Protecting and Restoring Colorado's Wetland Resource
    Statewide Strategies to Improve Effectiveness in Protecting and Restoring Colorado’s Wetland Resource Including the Rio Grande Headwaters Pilot Wetland Condition Assessment July 2011 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Statewide Strategies to Improve Effectiveness in Protecting and Restoring Colorado’s Wetland Resource Including the Rio Grande Headwaters Pilot Wetland Condition Assessment Prepared for: Colorado Parks and Wildlife Wetland Wildlife Conservation Program 317 West Prospect Fort Collins, CO 80526 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8. 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by: Joanna Lemly, Laurie Gilligan, and Michelle Fink Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 In collaboration with Brian Sullivan, Grant Wilcox, and Chris Johnson Colorado Parks and Wildlife Cover photographs: All photos taken by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Staff. Copyright © 2011 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved Statewide Strategies to Improve Effectiveness in Protecting and Restoring Colorado’s Wetland Resource EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wetland Wildlife Conservation Program is a voluntary, incentive-based program established by Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) to protect wetlands and wetland-dependent wildlife on public and private land. To date, much of the Program’s work has been based on local priorities and/or opportunities. Although the Program has made
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]