DOCSLIB.ORG

Appellate Doc 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appellate Doc 5 1 CITY COUNCIL 2 CITY OF SANGER, CA 3 VINCENT WALL, JOESEPH VILLALOBOS, DONNA SECOND ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT 4 BAILEY, EFREN RUBIO, MELISSA BEASELY, AND OF APPELLANTS POSITION FOR PROPOSED HENRY PROVOST, REQUIREMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE 5 PERMIT RESOLUTION 2018-07 Appellants, 6 vs. 7 CITY OF SANGER PLANNING COMMISSION, 8 Appellee 9 The undersigned Appellant has attached several additional documents in support of Appellant’s 10 appeal against CUP 2018-07. The evidence attached in the appendixes supports Appellants position that the City 11 failed to follow CEQA as the City has failed to take into account the cumulative effect of all the power plants in the 12 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, and the cumulative effect of all the power plants in the greater 13 San Joaquin Valley upon the environment of the Citizens of Sanger and/or the Citizens of the Greater San Joaquin 14 Valley. 15 Under CEQA 15300.2(b) a project cannot be exempted under CEQA 15301 if it has a cumulative 16 effect in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, and/or the Greater San Joaquin Valley, if the 17 cumulative impact of projects in the same place (San Juaquin Valley) over time are significant. 18 Appendix J: Is a list/database of the power plants in the State of California, 19 (https://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/power_plant_data/Power_Plants.xlsx) 20 Appendix K: is an edited version of Appendix J highlighting the power plants in the San Joaquin 21 Valley Air Pollution Control District. 22 Appendix L: is the status of all energy facilities (power plants) in the State of California, 23 (https://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/all_projects.html). 24 None of the items in Appendixes J, K, or L were considered in the Cities determination of the 25 cumulative effects of pollution of the increasing hours of the Sanger power plant with the effects of pollution of the 26 power plants listed in Appendixes A-L in San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, the Greater San Joaquin 27 Valley, and to the Citizens of Sanger. 28 SECOND ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS POSITION FOR PROPOSED REQUIREMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 2018-07 - 1 1 The City’s statement that operating the power plant for 300 more hours a year, or 49 minutes a 2 day, is negligible is conclusory and without a basis in the record. Report to the City of Sanger discussion of claim 2. 3 Further, the City compares the emissions of the greater pollution in Sanger to an overall emissions savings with out 4 of state power plants. This argument is pure conjecture. The City has provided no basis for this statement. Further, 5 the City appears to be arguing that it is better for other states if we increase pollution in our City. Sanger City 6 Council is tasked with protecting the health, welfare, and safety of its citizens and not the citizens of unknown 7 states. Additionally, the City’s argument fails to take into consideration the plurality of power plants in and around 8 the City of Sanger that have a direct effect upon its citizens, and how he cumulative effect of the power plants will 9 effect the environment of the Cities citizens. 10 Based upon the above, the city has failed to take into account the cumulative impact/effect that 11 increasing the hours of operation of the Sanger power plant will have on the environment and the public health of its 12 citizens because the City has failed to take into account the power plants in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 13 Control District, and/or the Greater San Joaquin Valley. 14 15 Dated this 20 of October, 2018. 16 17 /Vincent Wall/ 18 Vincent Wall (Individually) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS POSITION FOR PROPOSED REQUIREMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 2018-07 - 2 Appendix J Plant ID Plant Name MW General Fuel Status County City State Zip Code Initial Start Date Local Reliability Sub Area Service Area Service Category Caliso Balancing Authorities Air District Air Basin Senate District Assembly District Congressional District Renewable Energy G0551 4160 V Cogeneration System 1.2 Gas Operating San Diego San Diego CA 92109 1/1/1981 San Diego/ IV Area San Diego San Diego Gas & Electric IOU CALISO San Diego County Air Pollution Control District San Diego County Senate District 39 Assembly District 78 Congressional District 52 N G0004 939 Coast Management 0.23 Gas Operating San Diego La Jolla CA 92037 1/30/1987 San Diego/ IV Area San Diego San Diego Gas & Electric IOU CALISO San Diego County Air Pollution Control District San Diego County Senate District 39 Assembly District 78 Congressional District 52 N E0257 ABEC Bidart-Old River LLC 3.6 Digester Gas Operating Kern Bakersfield CA 93311 2/1/2014 Kern Midway Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District San Joaquin Valley Senate District 14 Assembly District 32 Congressional District 21 Y S0312 Adams East LLC 19 Solar Operating Fresno Mendota CA 93668 12/1/2014 Greater Fresno Wilson Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District San Joaquin Valley Senate District 12 Assembly District 31 Congressional District 21 Y S0410 Adelanto I 20 Solar Operating San Bernardino Adelanto CA 92301 9/10/2015 Southern California Edison IOU CALISO Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Mojave Desert Senate District 21 Assembly District 33 Congressional District 8 Y S0411 Adelanto II 7 Solar Operating San Bernardino Adelanto CA 92301 7/15/2015 Southern California Edison IOU CALISO Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Mojave Desert Senate District 21 Assembly District 33 Congressional District 8 Y S0218 Adelanto Solar Power Project 10 Solar Operating San Bernardino Adelanto CA 92301 6/1/2012 Southern California Edison IOU CALISO Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Mojave Desert Senate District 21 Assembly District 33 Congressional District 8 Y S0421 Adera Solar Project 20 Solar Operating Madera Chowchilla CA 12/31/2015 Greater Fresno Wilson Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District San Joaquin Valley Senate District 12 Assembly District 5 Congressional District 16 Y S0308 Adobe Solar 20 Solar Operating Kern Bakersfield CA 93306 5/1/2014 Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District San Joaquin Valley Senate District 14 Assembly District 32 Congressional District 21 Y S9149 Advanced Micro Decives 3 Solar Operating Santa Clara Santa Clara CA 94088 1/1/2012 Greater Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO Bay Area Air Quality Management District San Francisco Bay Senate District 13 Assembly District 24 Congressional District 17 Y G0802 AERA San Ardo Cogen Facility 3 Gas Operating Monterey San Ardo CA 93450 1/1/1989 Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District North Central Coast Senate District 17 Assembly District 30 Congressional District 20 N W0285 Aero Energy, LLC 2.21 Wind Operating Kern Tehachapi CA 93561 6/1/1985 Big Creek / Ventura Southern California Edison IOU CALISO Kern Air Pollution Control District Mojave Desert Senate District 16 Assembly District 34 Congressional District 23 Y S0116 Aerojet I (3.6MW) Solar Plant 3.6 Solar Operating Sacramento Folsom CA 95813 12/23/2009 Sierra Drum-Rio Oso Sacramento Municipal Utility District POU BANC Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District Sacramento Valley Senate District 1 Assembly District 8 Congressional District 7 Y S0130 Aerojet II (2.4MW) Solar Plant 2.4 Solar Operating Sacramento Sacramento CA 95814 5/21/2010 Sierra Drum-Rio Oso Sacramento Municipal Utility District POU BANC Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District Sacramento Valley Senate District 1 Assembly District 8 Congressional District 7 Y G0911 Agua Mansa Power Plant 60.5 Gas Operating San Bernardino Colton CA 92324 5/18/2003 LA Basin Colton Electric Utility Department POU CALISO South Coast Air Quality Management District South Coast Senate District 20 Assembly District 47 Congressional District 31 N T0023 Aidlin #1 22.4 Geothermal Operating Sonoma Middletown CA 95461 5/1/1989 North Coast/North Bay Eagle Rock Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District North Coast Senate District 2 Assembly District 2 Congressional District 2 Y S9047 Airport Division City of San Jose 1 Solar Operating Santa Clara San Jose CA 95112 1/1/2012 Greater Bay San Jose Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO Bay Area Air Quality Management District San Francisco Bay Senate District 10 Assembly District 25 Congressional District 19 Y G0379 Alameda 49.9 Gas Operating Alameda Alameda CA 95401 5/1/1986 Greater Bay Pittsburgh / Oakland Alameda Power & Telecom POU CALISO Bay Area Air Quality Management District San Francisco Bay Senate District 9 Assembly District 18 Congressional District 13 N S9121 Alameda Water District 1.3 Solar Operating Alameda Fremont CA 94538 1/1/2012 Greater Bay Pacific Gas & Electric Company IOU CALISO Bay Area Air Quality Management District San Francisco Bay Senate District 10 Assembly District 25 Congressional District 17 Y G0011 Alamitos 2102.77 Gas Operating Los Angeles Long Beach CA 90803 9/1/1956 LA Basin Western LA Basin Southern California Edison IOU CALISO South Coast Air Quality Management District South Coast Senate District 34 Assembly District 70 Congressional District 47 N H0058 Alamo 19.67 Hydro Operating Los Angeles Castaic CA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Board-Approved 2013-2014 Transmission Plan
    2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2013-2014 ISO Transmission Plan March 25, 2014 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Center 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S
    10-K 1 cpn_10kx12312014.htm CALPINE 10-K FOR YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF [X] 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT [ ] OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-12079 ______________________ Calpine Corporation (A Delaware Corporation) I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 77-0212977 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 830-2000 Not Applicable (Former Address) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Calpine Corporation Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A: System Data
    2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 APPENDIX A: System Data California ISO/MID A-1 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 A1 Existing Generation Table A1-1: Existing generation plants in PG&E planning area Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Humboldt Bay 166 Kekawaka 4.9 Pacific Lumber 32.5 PG&E - LP Samoa 25 Humboldt Fairhaven 17.3 Blue Lake 12 Humboldt Area Total 258 Santa Fe 160 Bear Canyon 20 Westford Flat 30 Western Geo 38 Geysers 5 53 Geysers 6 53 PG&E - North Coast and Geysers 7 53 North Bay Geysers 8 53 Geysers 11 106 Geysers 12 106 Geysers 13 133 Geysers 14 109 Geysers 16 118 California ISO/MID A-2 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Geysers 17 118 Geysers 18 118 Geysers 20 118 Bottle Rock 55 SMUD Geo 72 Potter Valley 11 Geo Energy 20 Indian Valley 3 Sonoma Landfill 6 Exxon 54 Monticello 12 North Coast and North Bay Area Total 1,619 Pit River 752 Battle Creek 17 Cow Creek 5 North Feather River 736 South Feather River 123 PG&E - West Feather River 26 North Valley Black Butte 11 CPV 717 Hatchet Ridge Wind 103 QFs 353 North Valley Area Total 2,843 California ISO/MID A-3 2012-2013 ISO Transmission Plan March 20, 2013 Planning Area Generating Plant Maximum Capacity Wadham 27 Woodland Biomass 25 UC Davis Co-Gen 4 Cal-Peak Vaca Dixon 49 Wolfskill Energy Cener 60 Lambie, Creed and Goosehaven 143 EnXco 60 Solano 100 High Winds 200 Shiloh 300 Bowman Power House 4 PG&E - Camp Far West (SMUD) 7 Central Valley Chicago Park Power House 40 Chili Bar Power House 7 Colgate Power House 294 Deer Creek Power House 6 Drum Power House 104 Dutch Plat Power House 49 El Dorado Power House 20 Feather River Energy Center 50 French Meadow Power House 17 Green Leaf No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Photovoltaic Plus Storage
    Photovoltaic plus Storage – Part 2, Projects By John Benson February 2019 1. Introduction Part 2 will describe recent major U.S. PV and storage projects and some new twists on residential PV plus storage. Part 1 of this paper (linked below) is on new technologies for utility-scale PV, utility-scale storage and PV plus storage systems, and the evolution of missions. https://www.energycentral.com/c/cp/photovoltaic-plus-storage-%E2%80%93-part-1- technology 2. Projects The projects described below include PV plus storage, PV-only and storage only. 2.1. Arizona Public Service and First Solar A 65 megawatt (MW) project is making news by coupling PV with battery energy storage systems (BESS), a first for utility Arizona Public Service, which solicited proposals in 2017 for generation sources to provide electricity during peak demand hours.1 The solar-plus-storage bid beat out other generation sources, including multiple proposals for natural gas plants. The utility has an agreement with an existing natural gas-fired plant for a total of 570 MW for the summers of 2020 through 2026. A dramatic drop in the cost of BESS, driven in large part by an increase in lithium-ion battery production to satisfy growing demand for electric vehicles allows a PV + storage project to be competitive with gas peakers plus offer more capabilities. Storage is capable of providing services like frequency regulation, which maintains the grid’s electric frequency on a second-to-second basis, and reactive power support, which supports the voltage that must be controlled for grid reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Comments on The
    CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JULY 2021 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This document contains all of the written comments received by the City of Santa Clara on the Dual-Branded Hotel at Coleman and Brokaw Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and presents the City’s responses to each of the substantive comments submitted by public agencies and members of the public. Written comments were received during the 30-day public review period, which extended from March 26, 2021 to April 26, 2021. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency must consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all comments received during the public review process. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.) Although written responses to comments on an MND are not required by CEQA, the City has determined to exceed the minimum requirements and prepare a response to the comments received that pertain to the adequacy of the IS/MND. According to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the State agencies that were invited to review the IS/MND included the following:1 • California Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Conservation (DOC) • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regions 2 and 3 • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) • California Department
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Sustainability Report CONTENTS
    2018 Annual Sustainability Report CONTENTS Our People ..................................................................................................2 Environmental Sustainability ...............................................................6 Our Products............................................................................................. 11 Our Governance ......................................................................................14 Our Headquarters and Regional Offices ....................................... 17 United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals ...................... 18 Our Possibilities ...................................................................................... 19 Vistra Energy Power Plants* Natural Gas Coal Nuclear Solar / Batteries Oil Batteries (under development) Retail Operations Plant Operations Retail and Plant Operations Regional Office Company Headquarters *Note: Does not include plants previously announced to be retired. CEO’S MESSAGE As an integrated energy company, Vistra Energy operates an innovative, customer-centric retail business and a generation fleet focused on safely, reliably, and efficiently generating power in the communities we serve. Electricity is an irreplaceable product that is critical to everyday life, whether it be for residences or businesses. We understand and take very seriously our role to provide cost-effective, reliable power to our customers and help fuel the economy. We also understand and take very seriously that our business has an environmental footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2018-2019 Study Plan
    2018-2019 Transmission Planning Process Unified Planning Assumptions and Study Plan March 30, 2018 Final ISO Market and Infrastructure Development Division March 30, 2018 Intentionally left blank Study Plan 2018-2019 Transmission Planning Process Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Overview of 2018-2019 Stakeholder Process Activities and Communications .. 2 2.1 Stakeholder Meetings and Market Notices ....................................... 2 2.3 Interregional Coordination ................................................................ 5 2.4 Stakeholder Comments .................................................................... 5 2.5 Availability of Information .................................................................. 5 3 Reliability Assessments ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 Reliability Standards and Criteria ..................................................... 7 3.1.1 NERC Reliability Standards ........................................................ 7 3.1.2 WECC Regional Criteria ............................................................. 8 3.1.3 California ISO Planning Standards ............................................. 8 3.2 Frequency of the study ..................................................................... 8 3.3 Study Horizon and Years .................................................................. 8 3.4 Study Areas .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C to California’S Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations
    Appendix C to California’s Proposed Compliance Plan for the Federal Clean Power Plan: Target Recalculation Calculations Prime Nameplate Generator mover Capacity Summer ARB Updated List EPA Original Plant Name Operator Name ORIS Code ID Fuel type type (MW) Capacity (MW) EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Rollins Nevada Irrigation District 34 1P WAT HY 12.1 12.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Venice Metropolitan Water District 72 1 WAT HY 10.1 10.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE J S Eastwood Southern California Edison Co 104 1 WAT PS 199.8 199.8 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 1 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE McClure Modesto Irrigation District 151 2 DFO GT 71.2 56.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 1 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 2 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Turlock Lake Turlock Irrigation District 161 3 WAT HY 1.1 1.1 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 1 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Hickman Turlock Irrigation District 162 2 WAT HY 0.5 0.5 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Volta 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 180 1 WAT HY 1.0 0.9 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 1 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Alta Powerhouse Pacific Gas & Electric Co 214 2 WAT HY 1.0 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Angels Utica Power Authority 215 1 WAT HY 1.4 1.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 217 1 WAT HY 31.0 31.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 2 WAT HY 48.6 52.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE Balch 2 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 218 3 WAT HY 48.6 55.0 EXCLUDE EXCLUDE
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 13
    ATTACHMENT 13 Project List PROJECT NAME CEC DOCKET# PROJECT OWNER* ALMOND 2 POWER PLANT 09-AFC-2C Turlock Irrigation District ALAMITOS ENERGY CENTER 13-AFC-01C AES ALLIANCE CENTURY ENERGY 01-EP-04C FACILITY Clarion Energy West, LLC ALLIANCE DREWS ENERGY 01-EP-05C FACILITY Clarion Energy West, LLC ALMOND II POWER PLANT 09-AFC-02C Turlock Irrigation District BLYTHE ENERGY PROJECT 99-AFC-08C AltaGas/Blythe Energy Inc BLYTHE ENERGY / 99-AFC-08C TRANSMISSION LINE AltaGas/Blythe Energy Inc BLYTHE SOLAR POWER 09-AFC-06C NextEra Energy Resources PROJECT BORDER PROJECT 01-EP-14C CalPeak Power-Border, LLC BOTTLE ROCK GEOTHERMAL 79-AFC-4C AltaRock Energy CALISTOGA GEYSER 81-AFC-1C Calpine Corporation CAMPBELL COGENERATION 93-AFC-3C SPA SMUD So California Public Power CANYON POWER PLANT 07-AFC-9C Authority CARLSBAD ENERGY CENTER 07-AFC-6C Carlsbad Energy Center LLC COLUSA GENERATING 06-AFC-9C STATION PG&E COSUMNES POWER PLANT 01-AFC-19C SMUD *The Energy Commission compiled the list of project owners based on the application for c Energy Commission. This list may be incomplete. Project Owner includes the business en certification or petition to amend, all of its parent companies and subsidiaries, and investo ownership interest. The Applicant is responsible for listing all Project Owners that meet the listed on this Attachment 15. CPV SENTINEL ENERGY 07/AFC-3C PROJECT Attachment 13 CPV Sentinel, LLC RFQ-19-703 Page 1 of 12 On Call DCBO ATTACHMENT 13 Project List PROJECT NAME CEC DOCKET# PROJECT OWNER* CROCKETT COGENERATION 92-AFC-1C Crocket Cogeneration
    [Show full text]
  • Lorrie Lele Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916
    Comment Letter O12 From: Lorrie J. LeLe To: Harris, Susan Cc: Kyle C. Jones Subject: Comments on Draft EIR - Boulder Brush Facilities (4646) Date: Monday, February 03, 2020 4:07:30 PM Attachments: 4646-013j - ABJC DEIR Comment to SD County.pdf Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy and Doyle Mills on the Boulder Brush Facilities Draft Environmental Impact Report. The original will be mailed, along with a flash drive containing the expert Scott Cashen’s cite O12-1 references. If you have any questions, please contact Kyle Jones directly. Thank you, Lorrie LeLe Legal Assistant Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo 520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] | Phone: 916. 444.6201 Ext. 10 | Fax: 916.444.6209 | __________________________________ This e-mail may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the send and delete all copies. ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO DANIEL L. CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE CHRISTINA M. CARO ATTORNEYS AT LAW 601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000 SARA F. DUDLEY SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 THOMAS A. ENSLOW 520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350 ANDREW J. GRAF TEL: (650) 589- 1660 TANYA A. GULESSERIAN SACRAMENTO, CA 95814- 4721 ___________ FAX: (650) 589- 5062 KENDRA D. HARTMANN* KYLE C. JONES TEL: (916) 444- 6201 RACHAEL E. KOSS FAX: (916) 444- 6209 NIRIT LOTAN AARON M.
    [Show full text]