DOCSLIB.ORG

Cloverside Bat Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cloverside Bat Project What have we found? Astonishingly, the initial bat monitoring on Cloverside Road detected 7 of Tasmania’s bat species: the chocolate wattled bat, eastern falsistrelle, goulds wattled bat, long-eared bat, large forest bat, little forest bat, and southern forest bat. We have also recorded the white-striped freetail bat at two sites in upper Cloverside —a species that has only once been recorded, but has never actually been confirmed in Tasmania. It is one of White-striped Free-tailed Bat © Michael Pennay the larger of the micro-bats, and is the only Australian bat to have an echolocation call that is audible to the human ear—it makes a Habitat characteristic ‘ping-ping’ call. Tasmanian bats generally do not live in caves but prefer to roost in old tree hollows and sometimes Bats detected on Lower Middle Upper within the attics and walls of rural buildings. They Cloverside Road (Red (Blue (Green perform a valuable ecosystem and agricultural Zone) Zone) Zone) service by controlling insect populations such as mosquitoes. It is important to protect bat habitat Little Forest Bat such as old trees, while reducing predatory threats such as cats. Large Forest Bat All of the Tasmanian bats are fully protected species and it is illegal to harm them in any way including to catch them without a permit. Southern Forest Bat Find out more here: http://www.fpa.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0020/127703/Bat_booklet_2015.pdf Goulds Wattled Bat CLOVERSIDE What next? Chocolate Wattled Bat BAT PROJECT We would like to invite our ‘bat mentor’ Paul Gray to come and have a look at the Cloverside habitat Eastern falsistrelle Summer 2017- 2018 and set up more bat detectors. It would be good to run the Acoustic Recorders over a longer period to pick up more information about the calls Long-eared Bat and behavior of the white-striped freetail bats. The Huon Valley Roamers also have the hand White-striped Free held Echo Meters available to loan. If you are -tailed Bat interested in participating, please get in touch: [email protected] Photo above supplied kindly by W.E.Brown, Lucaston Why Cloverside Rd? Monitoring Zones There is a ‘cluster’ of Huon Valley Roamers This summer, we have been working with our Landcare members who live on or near neighbours to monitor in three main areas on Cloverside Road—so it was a logical place to properties along Cloverside Road (as shown in focus our bat monitoring project this summer. red, blue and green below). We have also been monitoring bats in Judbury, Ranelagh and other sites in Lucaston. We have needed special technology to monitor the bats because most bat sounds are inaudible to humans. Although bats aren’t blind, in order to whizz around hunting insects at night they rely on an echolocation navigation system that works like sonar. Essentially, a bat can work out how far away something is by how long it takes its Our Story sounds to bounce back. The Roamers are enthusiastic volunteers — including NRM and landcare professionals, Equipment scientists and teachers, as well as passionate We have been using two main pieces of local families. The Roamers’ volunteer specialist equipment, the Echo Meter Touch and management committee puts on projects such as Song Meter Acoustic Recorders. tree planting, weeding, discovery days looking for fungi, and much more, to engage local residents When connected to an iPad or iPhone, the Echo of all ages (look up our @HuonValleyRoamers Meters allow users to record and listen to Facebook page). enhanced bat calls in real-time and apply GPS tags to identify their exact location. The Echo Meters also allow users to identify bat species as Learning About the Huon Valley’s Bats each has a unique echolocation pattern. We Citizen science is taking off at night in the Huon have been using the Echo Meters at dusk, stop- Valley, thanks to a new bat monitoring project ping at various points along the road to pick up being undertaken by members of the Huon Valley bat calls. Roamers Landcare Group. The Acoustic Recorders similarly record bat calls After running two very popular bat awareness and GPS details, but they can be strapped in nights, featuring talks by Tasmanian bat expert, place (e.g. to a tree or fence post) - the Acoustic Dr Lisa Cawthen, the Roamers have started a Recorders will pick up bat calls each night for project to monitor bats in local reserves and over a week. backyards in the Huon Valley as a way of improving local knowledge. Our monitoring project began in March 2017—we have been lucky enough to have mentoring sup- port in bat detection from another Tasmanian bat expert, Paul Gray. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bat Conservation 2021
    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Bat Fauna
    __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. An assessment of the risk to the Large Forest Bat Vespadelus darlingtoni from proposed wind turbines on Lord Howe Island, New South Wales. A report to Lord Howe Island Board G.A. Hoye Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd ABN 48 068 562 005 PO Box 271 BELMONT NSW 2280 Tel 4947 7794 Fax 4947 7537 January 2016 January 2016 Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. 1 INTRODUCTION Fly By Night Bat Surveys PL was requested by the Lord Howe Island Board to assess potential impacts to the Large Forest Bat from two proposed wind turbines to be sited in pasture on the southern flank of Transit Hill. This species is currently the only native mammal known to breed on the island. Previous survey has confirmed the presence of this species in the lower elevated parts of the island including the area where the two turbines are proposed (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010). A population of approximately 500 breeding females exists north of the airstrip, with a second smaller population centred around Mount Gower and Mount Lidgebird (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010-2014). Significant mortality of microchiropteran bats has occurred at utility wind farms in North America and Europe (eg Kunz 2007b). In eastern North America mortality from turbine strike along forested ridge tops varies from 15.3 to 41.1 bats per megawatt (MW) of installed capacity per year Kunz (2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Boxes: Creating Homes for Urban Wildlife
    Nest Boxes: Creating homes for urban wildlife Importance of Hollows Australia is home to over 350 species of land animals that depend on the hollows that form in old growth eucalyptus trees for shelter or reproduction. Hollows are formed through loss of limb, insect activity (like termites), decay and weathering. Suitable hollows taken a minimum of 80- 100 years and for larger animals it could be 150-250 years for a suitable hollow to form. Some of the many animals in Australia that rely on tree hollows include parrots, owls, kingfishers, ducks, possums, gliders, micro bats and even many reptiles, frogs and invertebrates. Within urban areas hollow bearing trees are found on public land (national parks, water ways, beach foreshore and streets) and on private land (front and back yards). Many hollow dependent species are in decline due to the widespread loss of hollow bearing trees. In urban areas hollows are removed for urban development (new houses, roads and factories) and for public safety reasons. Even if these trees are replanted, up to 100 years or more may pass before they begin to form hollows suitable for use by wildlife. If hollow dependent species are to continue to survive in urban and rural areas, urgent action is required to protect hollow bearing trees wherever possible. Nest boxes are needed in areas where hollows have already been lost. What are Nest Boxes? Nest boxes act as an artificial hollow that provide opportunities for hollow dependent fauna to survive in areas where their natural breeding habitat has been destroyed. Nest boxes are most useful in areas where hollows are lacking and other aspects of habitat are sufficient, such as food and water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • ABLV Bat Stats June 2016
    ABLV BAT STATS Australian Bat Lyssavirus Report - June 2016 Cases of ABLV infection - January to June 2016 Nine cases of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) Table 1: ABLV infection in Australian bats as confirmed by infection were reported in bats in Australia between FAT, PCR, IHC and/or virus isolation^ January and June 2016, from Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria (Table 1). YEAR NSW NT QLD VIC WA SA Total Queensland 1995 0 0 1# 0 0 0 1 Two black flying-foxes (Pteropus alecto), two little red 1996 1 0 9 1 0 0 11 flying-foxes (P. scapulatus) and one spectacled flying-fox (P. conspicillatus) from Queensland were found to be 1997 7 1 27+ 0 0 0 35 infected with ABLV to June 2016. In three bats, behaviour 1998 1 0 26+ 0 0 0 27 changes and neurological signs were reported such as hanging low in a tree, agitation, being subdued and easy 1999 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 to handle, twitching, nystagmus, paresis and inability to hang. Increased respiratory rate and effort were 2000 1 0 14 0 0 0 15 additionally reported in one bat. One bat was submitted 2001 0 0 9 1 4 0 14 because a person was bitten when picking the bat up, and the other due to contact with a pet dog. 2002 4 0 10 2 1 0 17 Histopathological findings included mild to severe non- 2003 6 0 3 2 0 0 11 suppurative meningoencephalitis, ganglioneuritis, subacute aspiration pneumonia and mild sialoadenitis. In 2004 5 0 6 1 0 0 12 one bat the urinary bladder was markedly distended with 2005 6 0 5 0 0 0 11 urine and the bladder wall was haemorrhagic.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Locality Map Appendix 2
    Appendix 1. Locality map Appendix 2. Species of conservation significance recorded within the site. Table 1. Threatened Flora species Common Name Scientific Name National NSW Victoria Threatened Threatened Threatened Species Species Species Boree Acacia pendula e Common Joyweed Alternanthera nodiflora k Swamp Wallaby Amphibromus fluitans vvk Grass Emu-foot Cullen tenax e Western Boobialla Myoporum montanum r Austral Pillwort Pilularia novae-hollandiae e Sandalwood Santalum lanceolatum e Lilac Darling Pea Swainsona phacoides e Key: e, endangered; v, vulnerable; r, rare; k, poorly known in Victoria 1 Other noteworthy flora may occur in the NSW Murray Central State Forests but their presence has not been positively determined. Potentially occurring threatened species include Brachycome muelleroides, Callitriche cyclocarpa, Cullen parvum, Lepidium monoplocoides, Rhodanthe stricta and Sclerolaena napiformis; National Threatened Species: listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; NSW Threatened Species: listed under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995; Victorian Threatened Species: listed under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988. Table 2. Threatened Fauna Species Common Name Scientific NameIUCN Threatened Species Act JAMBA/ Red Nationa NSW Victoria CAMBA List l BIRDS Australasian Shoveler4 (a) Anas rhynchotis v Forked-tailed Swift5 Apus pacificus J,C Great Egret3 (a) Ardea alba eJ,C Little Egret3 (a) Egretta garzetta ce Cattle Egret4 (a) Ardea ibis J,C Intermediate Egret3 (a) Ardea
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Fauna Survey Worimi Conservation Lands
    VERTEBRATE FAUNA SURVEY WORIMI CONSERVATION LANDS FINAL REPORT Prepared for NSW DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE ECOTONE ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS Pty Ltd 39 Platt Street, Waratah NSW 2298 Phone: (02) 4968 4901 fax: (02) 4968 4960 E-mail: [email protected] EEC PROJECT No. 0583CW SEPTEMBER 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Worimi Conservation Lands (WCL) cover an area of 4,200 hectares and are made up of three reserves: Worimi National Park, Worimi State Conservation Area and Worimi Regional Park. The WCL have been identified as a significant cultural landscape and are co-managed by a board of management. A vertebrate fauna survey of the Worimi Conservation lands has been undertaken in order to identify the fauna species assemblages within the WCL and record any significant species, including threatened species. As most of the previous studies were situated outside of or on the periphery of the WCL, a more detailed assessment of the fauna communities and habitat would assist in the future management for the WCL. From the literature review a total of 270 fauna species (excluding marine mammals) have been recorded within the study locality (2 km from the centre line of the WCL). These consisted of 189 bird, 49 mammal, 17 reptile and 15 frog species. It should be pointed out that it is unlikely that all of these species would occur within the WCL as the search area provides a greater variety of habitats than those identified within the WCL. Prior to the current survey a total of 135 species had been recorded within or very close to the WCL boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Bat Fauna at the Hepburn Community Wind
    AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BAT FAUNA AT THE HEPBURN COMMUNITY WIND FARM, LEONARDS HILL, VICTORIA Dr G.C. Richards Prepared for Hepburn Wind Park Co-operative Ltd, March 2011 Greg Richards and Associates Pty Ltd Australasian Bat Fauna Specialists Postal: P.O. Box 9, Gungahlin, ACT 2912 Office: 23 Tanderra Crescent, Ngunnawal, ACT Phones: 02 6255 0606 Mobile: 0408 221 520 Email: [email protected] ABN 99 074 890 823 2 ! CONTENTS' ! EXECUTIVE!SUMMARY! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!3! ! INTRODUCTION!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!4! ! METHODS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!6! Insectivorous!bats! ! ! ! ! ! !!6! Flying!foxes! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!6! ! STUDY!AREA!and!SAMPLING!SITES! ! ! ! ! !!6! ! RESULTS!AND!DISCUSSION! ! ! ! ! ! !!8! Weather!Conditions!during!Survey! ! ! ! !!8! Insectivorous!Bat!Species!Recorded! ! ! ! !!8! Insectivorous!Bat!Activity!and!Relative!Abundance! ! !!9! Habitat!Utilisation!by!Insectivorous!Bats!! ! ! 10! Differences!in!Activity!Patterns! ! ! ! ! 10! Flying!Fox!Utilisation!Assessment! ! ! ! 12! ! CONCLUSIONS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13! ! REFERENCE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13! ! 3 ! EXECUTIVE'SUMMARY' ! The! consultant! was! commissioned! by! Hepburn! Community! Wind! Park! CoWoperative! (Ltd)! ! to! conduct! an! assessment! of! the! bat! fauna! at! the! Hepburn! Community! Wind!Farm,!Leonards!Hill,!10km!south!of!Daylesford,!Victoria.!!The!wind!farm!is!comprised!of! two!turbines!located!in!an!open!paddock.!!The!study!was!designed!to!be!conducted!in!two! phases:!a!preWconstruction!survey!in!Spring!2010,!and!a!follow!up!survey!in!Summer!2011! when! seasonal! bat! activity! was! expected!
    [Show full text]
  • MICROBATS of the Young District
    MICROBATS of the Young District Major Players in Healthy Productive Landscapes and Waterways INTRODUCTION Welcome to the ‘Microbats of the Young District’ Project – a three-year program co-ordinated by Young District Landcare to familiarise the human residents of the Young district with a group of tiny mammals seldom seen or CONTENTS heard, but of greater importance to our economy and environmental health than most people appreciate. The Project has been made possible through funding by Riverina Local Land Services community grants. Introducing Microbats 3 In April 2014 the project was launched with a Bat Night Microbat body plan 3 presentation ‘Microbats - Fascinating Creatures of the Habitat 4 Night’, followed by school and community group talks, newspaper articles and radio interviews. The fact sheet Roosting 4 ‘Wildlife in the Young District – Microbats’ rounded out the initial education campaign. Foraging 5 Next came activities designed to enhance and protect Identification 6 microbat habitat “so that we can continue to reap the White-striped Freetail Bat 7 benefits of their presence into the future” (Mikla Lewis (Austronomas australis) OAM - YDL Co-ordinator). Inland Freetail Bat (Ozimops petersi) 7 One hundred and forty microbat boxes have been South-eastern Freetail (Little Mastiff) Bat 8 manufactured and installed with information signs in various locations around the Young district. Volunteers (Ozimops planiceps) have planted local ‘bat friendly’ native plants, with many Gould’s Wattled Bat (Chalinolobus gouldii) 8 also given away to encourage private plantings for Chocolate Wattled Bat (Chalinolobus morio) 9 future habitat. Large-footed (Southern) Myotis (Myotis At community workshops, primary producers have learnt macropus) 9 about ecosystem services provided by microbats.
    [Show full text]
  • Appleton-Baldhills-Bats.Pdf
    Statement on the Bald Hills Wind Farm Application Dr. Belinda Appleton Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3010. Qualifications BSc (Hons) Deakin University, PhD The University of Melbourne. PhD Thesis title: Systematics, phylogeography and population genetics of the large bent-wing bat, Miniopterus schreibersii (Chiroptera). Experience Trapping and researching bats for 8 years. Previous experience as witness in panel hearing, with regard to wind turbines in south west of Victoria. Publications Appleton BR, Norman J, McKenzie JA, and Christidis L () The distribution and population structure of south-eastern Australian Miniopterus. Philopatry, or lack of options? (in preparation) Appleton BR (2004) Genetics in Ecology, In (eds Attiwill P and Wilson B) Ecology, an Australian Perspective. Oxford University Press. Online publication (in press) Appleton BR, McKenzie JA and Christidis L (2004) Phylogeography of the large bent- wing bat, Miniopterus schreibersii. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (in press) Archer MS and Cardinal BR (2001). Seasonal reproduction and host infestation rates for nycteribiids of the large bent-wing bat. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 15, 452-454. Cardinal BR and Christidis L (2000) Mitochondrial DNA and morphology reveal three geographically distinct lineages of M.schreibersii in Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 48, 1-19. 1 Bat species likely to be found in the proposed area Gould’s wattled bat, Chalinolobus gouldii Chocolate wattled bat, Chalinolobus morio Large bent-wing bat, Miniopterus schreibersii Lesser long-eared bat, Nyctophilus geoffroyi Large forest bat, Vespadelus darlingtoni Southern forest bat, Vespadelus regulus Little forest bat, Vespadelus vulturnus White-striped freetail bat, Tadarida australis Other bat species possible in the area Eastern Falsistrelle, Falsistrellus tasmaniensis Large footed Myotis, Myotis adversus Eastern broad-nosed bat, Scotorepens orion Gould’s long-eared bat, Nyctophilus gouldi Eastern Freetail bat, Mormopterus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Genome Size Diversity in Bats (Order Chiroptera)1 Jillian D.L
    457 ARTICLE Patterns of genome size diversity in bats (order Chiroptera)1 Jillian D.L. Smith, John W. Bickham, and T. Ryan Gregory Abstract: Despite being a group of particular interest in considering relationships between genome size and metabolic param- eters, bats have not been well studied from this perspective. This study presents new estimates for 121 “microbat” species from 12 families and complements a previous study on members of the family Pteropodidae (“megabats”). The results confirm that diversity in genome size in bats is very limited even compared with other mammals, varying approximately 2-fold from 1.63 pg in Lophostoma carrikeri to 3.17 pg in Rhinopoma hardwickii and averaging only 2.35 pg ± 0.02 SE (versus 3.5 pg overall for mammals). However, contrary to some other vertebrate groups, and perhaps owing to the narrow range observed, genome size correlations were not apparent with any chromosomal, physiological, flight-related, developmental, or ecological characteristics within the order Chiroptera. Genome size is positively correlated with measures of body size in bats, though the strength of the relation- ships differs between pteropodids (“megabats”) and nonpteropodids (“microbats”). Key words: Chiroptera, genome size, C-value, flight, metabolism. Résumé : Bien qu’elles constituent un groupe présentant un intérêt particulier pour l’étude des relations entre la taille du génome et les paramètres métaboliques, les chauves-souris n’ont pas été bien étudiées sous cet angle. Dans ce travail, les auteurs présentent des estimés pour 121 espèces de “microchiroptères” appartenant a` 12 familles et ceci vient compléter une étude antérieure sur des membres de la famille des Pteropodidae (“mégachiroptères”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bat Diversity of Panboola
    The Bat Diversity of Panboola Pambula, N.S.W. An ecological report prepared for Pambula Wetlands Heritage Project Inc. JUNE 2010 Authors: Steve Sass & Linda Sass Report No. ER 0137 Citation EnviroKey (2010) The Bat Diversity of Panboola. A report prepared by Steve Sass & Linda Sass of EnviroKey for Pambula Wetlands Heritage Project Inc. Report No. ER 0137. Commercial In Confidence All intellectual property rights, including copyright, in documents created by EnviroKey remain the property of EnviroKey. The information contained within this document is confidential. It may only be used by the person to whom it is provided for the stated purpose for which it is provided. The document must not be imparted to any third person without the prior written approval of EnviroKey. Disclaimer The scope of work for this report was defined by time and budgetary constraints and the availability of other reports and data. EnviroKey accept no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material in whole or in part by any third party. Information in this report is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Front Cover Photo Gould’s Wattled Bat (Chalinolobus gouldii) in flight. Photo copyright Steve Sass. PO Box 7231 Tathra NSW 2550 t 02 6494 5422 www.envirokey.com.au [email protected] ABN 35255478680 Executive Summary EnviroKey initiated dialogue with Aimee Curtis, the Coordinator of the Pambula Wetlands and Heritage Project Inc. (PWHP) in 2009 to undertake a bat survey and provide a report probono to provide PWHP with a greater understanding of the bats of Panboola.
    [Show full text]