DOCSLIB.ORG

Bat Conservation 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bat Conservation 2019 Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2019 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Synopses of Conservation Evidence Copyright © 2019 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2019) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Dwarf fruit eating bat Dermanura gnoma, South America, © Adrià López-Baucells 2 Contents Advisory Board ......................................................................... 9 About the authors ................................................................... 10 Acknowledgements ................................................................ 11 About this book ...................................................................... 12 1. Threat: Residential and commercial development ........... 20 1.1. Retain existing bat roosts and access points within developments ................................. 20 1.2. Relocate access points to bat roosts within developments ............................................. 21 1.3. Install sound-proofing insulation between bat roosts and areas occupied by humans within developments ..................................................................................................................... 23 1.4. Create alternative bat roosts within developments ........................................................ 23 1.5. Change timing of building work ....................................................................................... 27 1.6. Exclude bats from roosts during building work ............................................................... 28 1.7. Educate homeowners about building and planning laws relating to bats to reduce disturbance to bat roosts ............................................................................................................... 29 1.8. Encourage homeowners to plant gardens with night-scented flowers ........................... 29 1.9. Encourage homeowners to increase semi-natural habitat within gardens ..................... 30 1.10. Protect brownfield or ex-industrial sites.......................................................................... 30 1.11. Protect greenfield sites or undeveloped land in urban areas .......................................... 31 1.12. Create or restore bat foraging habitat in urban areas ..................................................... 31 1.13. Legally protect bats during development ........................................................................ 33 2. Threat: Agriculture .......................................................... 36 All farming systems ................................................................................................................... 36 2.1. Use organic farming instead of conventional farming ..................................................... 36 2.2. Introduce agri-environment schemes .............................................................................. 40 2.3. Engage farmers and landowners to manage land for bats .............................................. 42 2.4. Provide or retain set-aside areas in farmland .................................................................. 43 2.5. Increase the proportion of semi-natural habitat in the farmed landscape ..................... 43 2.6. Reduce field size (or maintain small fields) ...................................................................... 43 2.7. Retain unmown field margins .......................................................................................... 44 2.8. Plant field margins with a diverse mix of plant species ................................................... 45 2.9. Plant new hedges ............................................................................................................. 45 2.10. Manage hedges to benefit bats ....................................................................................... 46 2.11. Manage ditches to benefit bats ....................................................................................... 47 2.12. Retain existing in-field trees ............................................................................................ 47 2.13. Plant in-field trees ............................................................................................................ 48 2.14. Create tree plantations on agricultural land to provide roosting and foraging habitat for bats 49 2.15. Retain remnant forest or woodland on agricultural land ................................................ 51 2.16. Retain or plant native trees and shrubs amongst crops (agroforestry) ........................... 54 Livestock farming ...................................................................................................................... 58 2.17. Avoid the use of antiparasitic drugs for livestock ............................................................ 58 3 2.18. Manage grazing regimes to increase invertebrate prey .................................................. 58 2.19. Replace culling with non-lethal methods of preventing vampire bats from spreading rabies to livestock .......................................................................................................................... 59 2.20. Remove livestock modifications from water troughs ...................................................... 59 Perennial, non-timber crops ...................................................................................................... 60 2.21. Prevent culling of bats around fruit orchards .................................................................. 60 2.22. Replace netting with non-lethal measures to prevent bats from accessing fruit in orchards ......................................................................................................................................... 61 2.23. Introduce certification for bat-friendly crop harvesting regimes .................................... 61 3. Threat: Energy production and mining ............................. 63 Wind turbines ............................................................................................................................ 63 3.1. Reduce turbine height...................................................................................................... 63 3.2. Reduce rotor diameter ..................................................................................................... 64 3.3. Apply textured coating to turbines .................................................................................. 64 3.4. Deter bats from turbines using radar .............................................................................. 65 3.5. Deter bats from turbines using ultrasound ...................................................................... 65 3.6. Deter bats from turbines using low-level ultraviolet light ............................................... 67 3.7. Remove turbine lighting to reduce bat and insect attraction .......................................... 67 3.8. Paint turbines to reduce insect attraction ....................................................................... 68 3.9. Close off potential access points on turbines to prevent roosting bats .......................... 68 3.10. Modify turbine placement to reduce bat fatalities .......................................................... 68 3.11. Retain a buffer between turbines and habitat features used by bats ............................. 69 3.12. Prevent turbine blades from turning at low wind speeds to reduce bat fatalities .......... 70 3.13. Increase the wind speed at which turbines become operational (‘cut-in speed’) to reduce bat fatalities ....................................................................................................................... 72 3.14. Automatically reduce turbine blade rotation when bat activity is high........................... 74 Mining ....................................................................................................................................... 75 3.15. Provide artificial subterranean bat roosts to replace roosts in reclaimed mines ............ 76 3.16. Exclude bats from roosts prior to mine reclamation ....................................................... 76 3.17. Relocate bats from reclaimed mines to alternative subterranean roost sites ................ 76 3.18. Retain access points for bats following mine closures..................................................... 77 3.19. Install and maintain gates at mine entrances to restrict public access ........................... 77 3.20. Maintain microclimate in closed/abandoned mines ....................................................... 79 3.21. Reopen entrances to closed mines and make suitable for roosting bats ........................ 80 4. Threat: Transportation and service corridors ................... 81 4.1. Install underpasses or culverts as road crossing structures for bats ............................... 81 4.2. Install overpasses as road crossing structures for bats .................................................... 84 4.3. Install bat gantries or bat bridges as road crossing structures for bats ........................... 86 4.4. Install green bridges as road crossing structures for bats ............................................... 87 4.5. Install hop-overs as road crossing structures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Records of Nyctalus Noctula Social Calls in Portugal
    Vespertilio 17: 37–44, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 First records of Nyctalus noctula social calls in Portugal Paulo BARROS, Luís BRAZ, Hélia Marisa vale-Gonçalves & João Alexandre Cabral Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] Abstract. The common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) is a large and fast flying Palaearctic migratory bat. The range of the species distribution extends in longitude from the Iberian Peninsula to Japan and in latitude from North Africa to the southern part of the Scandinavian countries. However, in the southern part of its distribution range, most of the potential maternity colonies are unknown or found only spo- radically. This note presents the first records of N. noctula social calls in Portugal. In fact, two types of N. noctula socials calls (C1 and D1) were recorded and identified at a site in the Sabor river valley in northern Portugal, which are usually associated with mating roosts. Therefore, these new data may contribute to improve and update the knowledge of the location of potential new mating, swarming and hibernation sites, as well as of the mating season length and behavioural patterns of this migratory species throughout its European range. Nyctalus noctula, social calls, bat swarming, Portugal Introduction The common noctule, Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774), is a large and fast flying Palaearctic bat, with broad rounded ears, rufous-brown fur, which is slightly darker on the dorsum, and has long narrow wings covered with short hair on the underside of the membrane close to the body (Dietz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Calls of New South Wales
    Bat calls of New South Wales Region based guide to the echolocation calls of microchiropteran bats Michael Pennay1 , Brad Law2 & Linda Reinhold3 1 New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation 2 State Forests of New South Wales 3 Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines Bat calls of New South Wales Bat calls of New South Wales Published by the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation May 2004 Copyright © NSW Department of Environment and Conservation ISBN 0 7313 6786 3 This guide is the result of a co-operative project between NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, now the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and State Forests of NSW (SFNSW). DEC provided project funding, management, staff, reference calls, preparation and printing. SFNSW provided part funding and granted support of staff time and expertise, reference calls and editing. Research was conducted under NPWS scientific licence number A2753 and SFNSW special purpose permit for research number 05466. Material presented in this publication may be copied for personal use or republished for non-commercial purposes provided that NSW Department of Environment and Conservation is fully acknowledged as the copyright owner. Apart from these purposes or for private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without written permission from NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. Inquiries should be addressed to the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. This publication should be cited as follows: Pennay, M., Law, B., Reinhold, L. (2004). Bat calls of New South Wales: Region based guide to the echolocation calls of Microchiropteran bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Conservation 2021
    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Echolocation Research a Handbook for Planning and Conducting Acoustic Studies Second Edition
    Bat Echolocation Research A handbook for planning and conducting acoustic studies Second Edition Erin E. Fraser, Alexander Silvis, R. Mark Brigham, and Zenon J. Czenze EDITORS Bat Echolocation Research A handbook for planning and conducting acoustic studies Second Edition Editors Erin E. Fraser, Alexander Silvis, R. Mark Brigham, and Zenon J. Czenze Citation Fraser et al., eds. 2020. Bat Echolocation Research: A handbook for planning and conducting acoustic studies. Second Edition. Bat Conservation International. Austin, Texas, USA. Tucson, Arizona 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ii Table of Contents Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................... vi Table of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................ vii Contributing Authors .......................................................................................................................................................... viii Dedication…… .......................................................................................................................................................................... xi Foreword…….. ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Bat Fauna
    __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. An assessment of the risk to the Large Forest Bat Vespadelus darlingtoni from proposed wind turbines on Lord Howe Island, New South Wales. A report to Lord Howe Island Board G.A. Hoye Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd ABN 48 068 562 005 PO Box 271 BELMONT NSW 2280 Tel 4947 7794 Fax 4947 7537 January 2016 January 2016 Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. 1 INTRODUCTION Fly By Night Bat Surveys PL was requested by the Lord Howe Island Board to assess potential impacts to the Large Forest Bat from two proposed wind turbines to be sited in pasture on the southern flank of Transit Hill. This species is currently the only native mammal known to breed on the island. Previous survey has confirmed the presence of this species in the lower elevated parts of the island including the area where the two turbines are proposed (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010). A population of approximately 500 breeding females exists north of the airstrip, with a second smaller population centred around Mount Gower and Mount Lidgebird (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010-2014). Significant mortality of microchiropteran bats has occurred at utility wind farms in North America and Europe (eg Kunz 2007b). In eastern North America mortality from turbine strike along forested ridge tops varies from 15.3 to 41.1 bats per megawatt (MW) of installed capacity per year Kunz (2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Australian Bat Lyssavirus in Insectivorous Bats of Western Australia
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Article Insights into Australian Bat Lyssavirus in Insectivorous Bats of Western Australia Diana Prada 1,*, Victoria Boyd 2, Michelle Baker 2, Bethany Jackson 1,† and Mark O’Dea 1,† 1 School of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA 6150, Australia; [email protected] (B.J.); [email protected] (M.O.) 2 Australian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia; [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-893607418 † These authors contributed equally. Received: 21 February 2019; Accepted: 7 March 2019; Published: 11 March 2019 Abstract: Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) is a known causative agent of neurological disease in bats, humans and horses. It has been isolated from four species of pteropid bats and a single microbat species (Saccolaimus flaviventris). To date, ABLV surveillance has primarily been passive, with active surveillance concentrating on eastern and northern Australian bat populations. As a result, there is scant regional ABLV information for large areas of the country. To better inform the local public health risks associated with human-bat interactions, this study describes the lyssavirus prevalence in microbat communities in the South West Botanical Province of Western Australia. We used targeted real-time PCR assays to detect viral RNA shedding in 839 oral swabs representing 12 species of microbats, which were sampled over two consecutive summers spanning 2016–2018. Additionally, we tested 649 serum samples via Luminex® assay for reactivity to lyssavirus antigens. Active lyssavirus infection was not detected in any of the samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • (RVS) Raccoon, Fox, Skunk
    Most Common Bats in So MD Little Brown Bat, Evening Bat, Red Bat, Big Brown Bat Little Brown Bat 4 – 9 g body weight 3 1/8 – 3 7/8” length 9 - 11” wing span 10 – 30 year lifespan Single bat catches up to 600 mosquitoes per hour Long, glossy dark fur, long hairs on hind feet extend beyond tips of claws. Face, ears, and wing membranes are dark brown Mate late August – November, sperm stored until spring, one pup born May or June after 60 day gestation Pup weighs up to 30% of mother’s weight which is like a 120 lb woman giving birth to a 36 lb baby Pups hang onto mom for 3 – 4 days, even during feeding. Pups capable of flight at 18 days and adult size at 3 weeks Evening Bat 6 - 13 g body weight 3 – 3 7/8” length 10 - 11” wing span 2 – 5 year lifespan Colony of 300 Evening Bats will consume 6.3 million insects per summer Fur is short, dull brown, belly paler. Ears/wing membranes blackish brown Average of 2 pups born late May or early June. Born pink and hairless with eyes closed. Capable of flight within 20 days and nearly adult sized at 4 weeks. Weaned at 6 – 9 weeks Red Bat 9 - 15 g body weight 3.75 - 5” length 11 - 13” wing span 32 teeth/40mph flight Bright orange to brick red angora-like fur often with frosted appearance (females more frosted than males), white shoulder patches. Heavily furred tail membrane. Females have 4 nipples unlike most bats with 2 Mating season Aug – Sept, sperm stored until following spring (April-May).
    [Show full text]
  • Chiroptera Vespertilionadae
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus. 1985,12 (1): 85-146 Systematic Revision of Australian Scoteanax and Scotorepens (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with Remarks on Relationships to other Nycticeiini DJ. Kitchener* and N. Caputit Abstract Classical and numerical taxonomic approaches based on morphology and utilising electrophoretic information have been applied to clarify the status of Australian species hitherto placed in the genus Nycticeius. Eight named forms have been reduced to five species; these are placed in existing genera: Scateanax (rueppellii) and Scatarepens (arian, balstani, sanbarni and greyii). Phylogenetic analysis of species representative of other Nycticeiini genera, and of geographic groupings of these Australian species, provides additional support for the above generic conclusions. Indicators of gross morphology (skull, radius and lower tooth row lengths) in Scatarepens spp. vary in relation to their sex, and to latitude, longitude and several climatic variables, particularly average minimum temperatures inJuly. Introduction The named forms of vespertilionids considered in this study are: Scotoph£lus grey££ Gray, 1843; Nyct£ce£us rueppell££ Peters, 1866; Scote£nus balston£ Thomas, 1906; Scoteinus £nfluatus Thomas, 1924; Scoteinus or£on Troughton, 1937; Scote£nus sanborn£ Troughton, 1937; Scote£nus balston£ caprenus Troughton, 1937; and Scote£nus or£on aqu£lo Troughton, 1937. These forms have long been the cause of great taxonomic confusion, both at the generic and specific levels. Dobson (1875) referred rueppell££ and grey££ to Scotoph£lus by placing them in the subgenus Scote£nus. Thomas (1906) placed rueppell££ and grey££ in the genus Scote£nus as did Miller (1907) who raised Scote£nus to generic rank (based principally on a study of the Australian species balston£ and grey££, but without reference to the type species, Nyct£ce£us emar­ g£natus Dobson, 1871).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities
    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report Authors Steven K. Pelletier Kristian S. Omland Kristen S. Watrous Trevor S. Peterson Prepared under BOEM Contract M11PD00212 by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Herndon, VA Office of Renewable Energy Programs June 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY The report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report from BOEM or the National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Office of Renewable Energy Programs 5285 Port Royal Road 381 Elden Street, HM-1328 Springfield, Virginia 22161 Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: (703) 605-6040 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: [email protected] CITATION Pelletier, S.K., K.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union
    Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 – 2024 October 2018 Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 - 2024 EDITORS: BAROVA Sylvia (European Commission) & STREIT Andreas (UNEP/EUROBATS) COMPILERS: MARCHAIS Guillaume & THAURONT Marc (Ecosphère, France/The N2K Group) CONTRIBUTORS (in alphabetical order): BOYAN Petrov * (Bat Research & Conservation Centre, Bulgaria) DEKKER Jasja (Animal ecologist, Netherlands) ECOSPHERE: JUNG Lise, LOUTFI Emilie, NUNINGER Lise & ROUÉ Sébastien GAZARYAN Suren (EUROBATS) HAMIDOVIĆ Daniela (State Institute for Nature Protection, Croatia) JUSTE Javier (Spanish association for the study and conservation of bats, Spain) KADLEČÍK Ján (Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, Slovakia) KYHERÖINEN Eeva-Maria (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland) HANMER Julia (Bat Conservation Trust, United Kingdom) LEIVITS Meelis (Environmental Agency of the Ministry of Environment, Estonia) MARNELl Ferdia (National Parks & Wildlife Service, Ireland) PETERMANN Ruth (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany) PETERSONS Gunărs (Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia) PRESETNIK Primož (Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Slovenia) RAINHO Ana (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) REITER Guido (Foundation for the protection of our bats in Switzerland) RODRIGUES Luisa (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) RUSSO Danilo (University of Napoli Frederico II, Italy) SCHEMBRI
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Distribution of Pipistrellus Pipistrellus and Pipistrellus Pygmaeus in the Lothians Region, Scotland
    BaTML Publications www.batml.org.uk Factors affecting the distribution of Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus in the Lothians region, Scotland Author: Sarah Clear* Dated: 1st November 2005 *Correspondence details: email: [email protected] Abstract Until recently it was believed that Bandit pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) and Soprano pipistrelle (P. pygmaeus) were one species, as such relatively little is known regarding factors that affect their distribution in the UK. The BATS and The Millennium Link project (BaTML) has been surveying different sites on the Union and Forth & Clyde Canals to assess use of these canals by bats. They found a higher incidence of Soprano pipistrelle relative to Bandit pipistrelle than expected. This paper reports on a study which aimed to determine whether the relative abundances of the two species of pipistrelle in woodland and parkland sites, away from the canal, are similar to the abundances found in the Union Canal area, and to determine what factors are affecting their distribution. Four non­canal sites were surveyed between July and September 2004. The data collected from these surveys was compared with four canal sites previously surveyed by BaTML. The results showed that Soprano pipistrelle was more numerous than Bandit pipistrelle at all of the non­canal sites, indicating a higher abundance of Soprano pipistrelle in the Lothian region. Key words: Bandit, pipistrelle, Soprano, bats, BaTML, Union, Forth & Clyde, canals, bat Introduction selection (Barlow, 1997; Russ & Montgomery, 2002) showing a greater preference for habitats Until recently it was believed that there was only a with water (Russo & Jones, 2003). Bandit single species of pipistrelle bat resident in Britain.
    [Show full text]