DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 – 2024 October 2018 Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 - 2024 EDITORS: BAROVA Sylvia (European Commission) & STREIT Andreas (UNEP/EUROBATS) COMPILERS: MARCHAIS Guillaume & THAURONT Marc (Ecosphère, France/The N2K Group) CONTRIBUTORS (in alphabetical order): BOYAN Petrov * (Bat Research & Conservation Centre, Bulgaria) DEKKER Jasja (Animal ecologist, Netherlands) ECOSPHERE: JUNG Lise, LOUTFI Emilie, NUNINGER Lise & ROUÉ Sébastien GAZARYAN Suren (EUROBATS) HAMIDOVIĆ Daniela (State Institute for Nature Protection, Croatia) JUSTE Javier (Spanish association for the study and conservation of bats, Spain) KADLEČÍK Ján (Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, Slovakia) KYHERÖINEN Eeva-Maria (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland) HANMER Julia (Bat Conservation Trust, United Kingdom) LEIVITS Meelis (Environmental Agency of the Ministry of Environment, Estonia) MARNELl Ferdia (National Parks & Wildlife Service, Ireland) PETERMANN Ruth (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany) PETERSONS Gunărs (Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia) PRESETNIK Primož (Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Slovenia) RAINHO Ana (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) REITER Guido (Foundation for the protection of our bats in Switzerland) RODRIGUES Luisa (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) RUSSO Danilo (University of Napoli Frederico II, Italy) SCHEMBRI GAMBIN Lisa (Malta Environment and Planning Authority) SPITZENBERGER Friederike (Batlife, Austria) SZODORAY-PARADI Abigel (Romanian Bat Protection Association, Romania) TAPIERO Audrey (Federation of the French Wildlife trusts, France) VLASAKOVA Libuse (Ministry of the Environment, Czech Republic) COVER PHOTO: Pipistrellus pipistrellus – L. Spanneut (Ecosphère) Boyan Petrov, an eminent bat expert, who will stay forever somewhere in the Himalayas’ peaks, provided an invaluable contribution to this action plan Contents 1 - BAT species and their natural history .................................................. 5 1.1 - European Bat species and their IUCN Red list status ................ 5 1.2 - Natural history of bats .................................................................. 7 1.2.1 - Evolution and Biogeography ................................................................................ 7 1.2.2 - Life cycle ................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.3 - Diet, dispersal and migration .............................................................................. 11 2 - Bat Conservation in Europe ............................................................... 15 2.1 - Conservation through the Habitats Directive and EU policies .15 2.1.1 - The Natura 2000 network and site protection provisions ................................ 15 2.1.2 - Species protection provisions ............................................................................ 17 2.1.3 - EU biodiversity strategy ...................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 - Green infrastructure ............................................................................................ 18 2.2 - UNEP/EUROBATS ........................................................................18 2.3 - NGOs and BatLife Europe ...........................................................19 2.4 - Bat Action Plans ..........................................................................19 2.4.1 - National Action Plans .......................................................................................... 19 2.4.2 - Other regional action plans ................................................................................ 20 2.4.3 - Action Plans for the conservation of bats in Europe ....................................... 21 2.5 - EUROBATS co-funded projects ..................................................21 3 - Surveillance and knowledge assessment .......................................... 22 3.1 - Introduction ..................................................................................22 3.2 - Population survey` ......................................................................22 3.2.1 - Surveillance methods .......................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 - Data analysis and compilation for roosts .......................................................... 23 3.2.3 - Daily and seasonal movements – migration ..................................................... 24 3.2.4 - Prototype pan European indicator ..................................................................... 25 3.2.5 - Autoecological studies for priority species ...................................................... 27 3.2.6 - Bat rescue and rehabilitation .............................................................................. 27 3.3 - Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive (2007- 2012): outcomes ..........................................................................28 3.4 - Gaps in biological knowledge .....................................................31 4 - Threats and conservation issues ....................................................... 33 4.1 - Loss and disturbance of roosts ..................................................33 Action Plan for the Conservation of Bat Species in the European Union – October 2018 1 4.1.1 - Underground sites ............................................................................................... 33 4.1.2 - Roosts in buildings ............................................................................................. 35 4.1.3 - Tree roosts ........................................................................................................... 42 4.2 - Commuting and foraging in fragmented landscapes ................42 4.2.1 - Land planning and fragmentation ...................................................................... 42 4.2.2 - Agricultural practices .......................................................................................... 45 4.2.3 - Forestry practices ................................................................................................ 46 4.2.4 - Light pollution ...................................................................................................... 48 4.3 - Infrastructures and mortality ......................................................49 4.3.1 - Traffic infrastructures.......................................................................................... 49 4.3.2 - Wind energy development .................................................................................. 54 4.4 - Infectious diseases ......................................................................57 4.4.1 - Infections affecting bats...................................................................................... 57 4.4.2 - Negative public opinion of bats as carriers of viruses ..................................... 58 4.5 - Misunderstandings and myths ...................................................60 4.5.1 - Ignorance .............................................................................................................. 60 4.5.2 - Educational programs ......................................................................................... 60 5 - A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION ........................................................ 61 5.1 - Vision and overall goal ................................................................61 5.2 - Targets .........................................................................................61 5.4 - Actions .........................................................................................63 Annex: Working within the framework of EUROBATS ............................................. 71 Meeting of Parties (MoP) and Secretariat .......................................................................71 Advisory Committee and Intersessional Working Groups (IWG) .................................71 Conservation and Management Plan ..............................................................................72 6 - Bibliography ....................................................................................... 74 Action Plan for the Conservation of Bat Species in the European Union – October 2018 2 List of table, figures and maps Table 1 – European species and their conservation status .................................................... 5 Table 2 – The different roost types for the European bats ....................................................10 Table 3 - Different population parameters for 5 species from Central Europe (from (7)). ......13 Table 4 – Spatial behaviour of European bat species (from (17)). ........................................14 Table 5 - Data from the Natura 2000 database (end of 2014, excluding Population category D) .........................................................................................................................................16 Table 6 – Slope, error of slope and number of sites where the species occurred; trend of species and of the combined prototype European hibernating bat indicator ........................26 Table 7 – Conservation status per biogeographical region. ..................................................29 Table 8 – Conservation status per species and biogeographical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Bats Do You Have and How Can You Help Them • About British Bats
    What bats do you have and how can you help them • About British bats • What bats you have – including rarities • Projects of interest • What we can all do for all bats UK bat species British bats Horseshoe Horseshoes Greater horseshoe family Lesser horseshoe Myotis bats Alcathoe bat Bechstein’s bat Brandt’s bat Daubenton’s bat Natterer’s bat Whiskered Big bats Noctule Vesper family Leisler’s bat - evening bats or common Serotine bat Pipistrelles Common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus) Soprano pipistrelle Nathusius’ pipistrelle Long-eareds Brown long-eared bat (Plecotus) © Ash Murray © Ash Murray Grey long-eared bat Barbastelle 17 species of bats breed in the UK Unique in their power of flight Where bats live Bats use different roosts at different times of the year Bats often roost in buildings and other built structures Some bats only roost in trees Some bats will also roost in bat boxes Bat habitats: roosts Where bats feed Bats need good foraging habitat near to where they roost Good foraging habitats are those that support insects (and a range of other biodiversity) Bats will feed over water, woodland, marshy areas, hedgerows, grazed and semi-improved grassland Connectivity and unlit green infrastructure is important Bat habitats: foraging • Suitable feeding areas close to roost sites • Good variety and number of insects • Sheltered areas where insects can be caught more easily Bat habitats: linkages • Linear features such as hedgerows and other flight-line features • Vital for bats to navigate from roost to feeding area How do they
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of Nyctalus Noctula Social Calls in Portugal
    Vespertilio 17: 37–44, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 First records of Nyctalus noctula social calls in Portugal Paulo BARROS, Luís BRAZ, Hélia Marisa vale-Gonçalves & João Alexandre Cabral Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] Abstract. The common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) is a large and fast flying Palaearctic migratory bat. The range of the species distribution extends in longitude from the Iberian Peninsula to Japan and in latitude from North Africa to the southern part of the Scandinavian countries. However, in the southern part of its distribution range, most of the potential maternity colonies are unknown or found only spo- radically. This note presents the first records of N. noctula social calls in Portugal. In fact, two types of N. noctula socials calls (C1 and D1) were recorded and identified at a site in the Sabor river valley in northern Portugal, which are usually associated with mating roosts. Therefore, these new data may contribute to improve and update the knowledge of the location of potential new mating, swarming and hibernation sites, as well as of the mating season length and behavioural patterns of this migratory species throughout its European range. Nyctalus noctula, social calls, bat swarming, Portugal Introduction The common noctule, Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774), is a large and fast flying Palaearctic bat, with broad rounded ears, rufous-brown fur, which is slightly darker on the dorsum, and has long narrow wings covered with short hair on the underside of the membrane close to the body (Dietz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Conservation 2021
    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 41, 2000
    BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume 41 : No. 1 Spring 2000 I I BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume 41: Numbers 1–4 2000 Original Issues Compiled by Dr. G. Roy Horst, Publisher and Managing Editor of Bat Research News, 2000. Copyright 2011 Bat Research News. All rights reserved. This material is protected by copyright and may not be reproduced, transmitted, posted on a Web site or a listserve, or disseminated in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Publisher, Dr. Margaret A. Griffiths. The material is for individual use only. Bat Research News is ISSN # 0005-6227. BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume41 Spring 2000 Numberl Contents Resolution on Rabies Exposure Merlin Tuttle and Thomas Griffiths o o o o eo o o o • o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o 1 E - Mail Directory - 2000 Compiled by Roy Horst •••• 0 ...................... 0 ••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 ,t:.'. Recent Literature Compiled by :Margaret Griffiths . : ....••... •"r''• ..., .... >.•••••• , ••••• • ••< ...... 19 ,.!,..j,..,' ""o: ,II ,' f 'lf.,·,,- .,'b'l: ,~··.,., lfl!t • 0'( Titles Presented at the 7th Bat Researc:b Confei'ebee~;Moscow :i'\prill4-16~ '1999,., ..,, ~ .• , ' ' • I"',.., .. ' ""!' ,. Compiled by Roy Horst .. : .......... ~ ... ~· ....... : :· ,"'·~ .• ~:• .... ; •. ,·~ •.•, .. , ........ 22 ·.t.'t, J .,•• ~~ Letters to the Editor 26 I ••• 0 ••••• 0 •••••••••••• 0 ••••••• 0. 0. 0 0 ••••••• 0 •• 0. 0 •••••••• 0 ••••••••• 30 News . " Future Meetings, Conferences and Symposium ..................... ~ ..,•'.: .. ,. ·..; .... 31 Front Cover The illustration of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum on the front cover of this issue is by Philippe Penicaud . from his very handsome series of drawings representing the bats of France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods
    The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods A report prepared for The Woodland Trust The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods Andrew Carr, Dr Matt Zeale & Professor Gareth Jones School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ Report prepared for The Woodland Trust October 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks to: Dave Rickwood of the Woodland Trust for his central role and continued support throughout this project; Dr Andrew Weatherall of the University of Cumbria; Simon Lee of Natural England and James Mason of the Woodland Trust for helpful advice; Dr Beth Clare of Queen Mary University of London for support with molecular work; the many Woodland Trust volunteers and assistants that provided their time to the project. We would particularly like to thank Tom ‘the tracker’ Williams and Mike ‘the trapper’ Treble for dedicating so much of their time. We thank the Woodland Trust, Natural England and the Heritage Lottery Fund for funding this research. We also appreciate assistance from the local landowners who provided access to land. i Contents Acknowledgements i Contents ii List of figures and tables iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods 2 1.3 Objectives 2 2 Methods 2 2.1 Study area 2 2.2 Bat capture, tagging and radio-tracking 3 2.3 Habitat mapping 4 2.4 Analysis of roost preferences 5 2.5 Analysis of ranges and foraging areas 7 2.6 Analysis of diet 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Capture data 8 3.2 Roost selection and preferences 9 3.3 Ranging and foraging 14 3.4 Diet 17 4 Discussion 21 4.1 Roost use 21 4.2 Ranging behaviour 24 4.3 Diet 25 5 Conclusion 26 References 27 Appendix 1 Summary table of all bat captures 30 Appendix 2 Comparison of individual B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Distribution of Mediterranean Mammals
    THE STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF MEDITERRANEAN MAMMALS Compiled by Helen J. Temple and Annabelle Cuttelod AN E AN R R E IT MED The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment THE STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF MEDITERRANEAN MAMMALS Compiled by Helen J. Temple and Annabelle Cuttelod The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organizations, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK Copyright: © 2009 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Red List logo: © 2008 Citation: Temple, H.J. and Cuttelod, A. (Compilers). 2009. The Status and Distribution of Mediterranean Mammals. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK : IUCN. vii+32pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1163-8 Cover design: Cambridge Publishers Cover photo: Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus © Antonio Rivas/P. Ex-situ Lince Ibérico All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details).
    [Show full text]
  • Look What the Cat Dragged In: Felis Silvestris Catus As Predators of Insular Bats and Instance of Predation on the Endangered Pipistrellus Maderensis
    Ricardo Rocha Barbastella 8 (1) Open Access ISSN: 1576-9720 SECEMU www.secemu.org Look what the cat dragged in: Felis silvestris catus as predators of insular bats and instance of predation on the endangered Pipistrellus maderensis Ricardo Rocha1,2 ¹ Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon (Portugal). 2 Metapopulation Research Centre University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 Helsinki (Finland). *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14709/BarbJ.8.1.2015.04 © 2015 Published by SECEMU. Spanish title: Felis silvestris catus como predador de murciélagos insulares y cita de depredación sobre el amenazado Pipistrellus madei- rensis. Abstract: This note reports the predation of a threatened Madeira pipistrelle bat by a domestic house cat. This represents the first confirmed record of cat predation upon a Macaronesian bat and adds to an increasing body of evidence suggesting that free-ranging cats pose a strong negative impact to native insular vertebrate populations. Keywords: bats, domestic cats, non-native species, Madeira pipistrelle, Macaronesia. received: January 2nd. 2015 accepted: February 7th 2015 The impact of non-native species is one of the most influential forces underpinning the global biodiversity crisis (Nogales et al. 2013, Dirzo et al. 2014). Since the domestication of the African wildcat Felis silvestris lybica some 9500 years ago, the domestic counterpart F. s. catus (Fig. 1) has become one of the world’s most abundant and widespread pets and has established feral populations in both continental and island ecosystems (Driscoll et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Body Parts in Bats (Chiroptera)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Frequent or scarce? Damage to flight± enabling body parts in bats (Chiroptera) 1 1 1 2 Jan CichockiID *, Marcin Warchaøowski , Agnieszka Ważna , Iwona Gottfried , Anna Bator±Kocoø1, Tomasz Gottfried3, Adrianna Kościelska1, Jacek Bojarski4, Monika Pietraszko±Warchaøowska5, Grzegorz Gabryś1 1 Department of Zoology, University of Zielona GoÂra, Zielona GoÂra, Poland, 2 Department of Behavioural Ecology, University of Wrocøaw, Wrocøaw, Poland, 3 Polish Society of Wildlife Friends ªpro Naturaº, Wrocøaw, Poland, 4 Center for Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Econometrics, University of Zielona GoÂra, Zielona GoÂra, Poland, 5 Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, University of Wrocøaw, Wrocøaw, Poland a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Bat wings are characterized by high endurance, and these mammals have developed a number of adaptations that protect them from falling into obstacles and potential injuries. However, in bat populations, there are individuals with visible fresh or healed injuries to the flight±enabling body parts. The aim of this research was to determine the differences in the OPEN ACCESS occurrence of wing membrane damages among species of bats that differ in ecology and Citation: Cichocki J, Warchaøowski M, Ważna A, behavior. The study was conducted in southern and western Poland in the years 2000± Gottfried I, Bator±Kocoø A, Gottfried T, et al. (2019) Frequent or scarce? Damage to flight±enabling 2016 and included 3,525 individuals of six species: lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolopus hippo- body parts in bats (Chiroptera). PLoS ONE 14(7): sideros, Daubenton's bat Myotis daubentonii, Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri, greater e0219783.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Short report Open Access Molecular species identification boosts bat diversity Frieder Mayer*1, Christian Dietz2 and Andreas Kiefer3 Address: 1University of Erlangen; Department of Zoology; Staudtstrasse 5; D-91058 Erlangen; Germany, 2University of Tübingen; Department of Animal Physiology; Auf der Morgenstelle 28; D-72076 Tübingen; Germany and 3University of Mainz; Department of Zoology; Becherweg 13; D- 55099 Mainz; Germany Email: Frieder Mayer* - [email protected]; Christian Dietz - [email protected]; Andreas Kiefer - akiefer@uni- mainz.de * Corresponding author Published: 12 February 2007 Received: 20 September 2006 Accepted: 12 February 2007 Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:4 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-4 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/4 © 2007 Mayer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract The lack of obvious morphological differences between species impedes the identification of species in many groups of organisms. Meanwhile, DNA-based approaches are increasingly used to survey biological diversity. In this study we show that sequencing the mitochondrial protein-coding gene NADH dehydrogenase, subunit 1 (nd1) from 534 bats of the Western Palaearctic region corroborates the promise of DNA barcodes in two major respects. First, species described with classical taxonomic tools can be genetically identified with only a few exceptions. Second, substantial sequence divergence suggests an unexpected high number of undiscovered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities
    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report Authors Steven K. Pelletier Kristian S. Omland Kristen S. Watrous Trevor S. Peterson Prepared under BOEM Contract M11PD00212 by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Herndon, VA Office of Renewable Energy Programs June 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY The report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report from BOEM or the National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Office of Renewable Energy Programs 5285 Port Royal Road 381 Elden Street, HM-1328 Springfield, Virginia 22161 Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: (703) 605-6040 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: [email protected] CITATION Pelletier, S.K., K.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Meeting of the Parties
    Inf.EUROBATS.MoP7.45 7th Meeting of the Parties Brussels, Belgium, 15 – 17 September 2014 Report on Autecological Studies for Priority Species Convenor: Stéphane Aulagnier In accordance with Resolution 4.12, the current work being carried out on autecological studies of the Priority List of species (Rhinolophus euryale, Myotis capaccinii and Miniopterus schreibersii) should be updated by the Advisory Committee and should be made public. References of papers and reports dealing with autecological studies Rhinolophus euryale Barataud M., Jemin J., Grugier Y. & Mazaud S., 2009. Étude sur les territoires de chasse du Rhinolophe euryale, Rhinolophus euryale, en Corrèze, site Natura 2000 des Abîmes de la Fage. Le Naturaliste. Vendéen, 9 : 43-55. The cave of la Fage (Noailles, Département of Corrèze) is a major site for the Mediterranean horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus euryale Blasius 1853. However, contrary to the tendency to increase noted over the last 20 years in various other birth sites in France, numbers at la Fage have shown no change. One of the suspected causes links this to the presence of the A20 motorway, less than a kilometre away, where corpses have been collected. This article presents the results of a radio-tracking study of the space occupied by the colony, during the summers of 2006 and 2007. Voigt C.C., Schuller B.M., Greif S. & Siemers B.M., 2010. Perch-hunting in insectivorous Rhinolophus bats is related to the high energy costs of manoeuvring in flight. Journal of Comparative Physiology Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, 180(7): 1079-1088 Foraging behaviour of bats is supposedly largely influenced by the high costs of flapping flight.
    [Show full text]