The Pit and the Pendulum Story Quest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Of 1808: Ideological Disquiet and Certainty in Moratín Jesús Pérez-Magallón Mcgill University
The “Perfidious Invasion” of 1808: Ideological Disquiet and Certainty in Moratín Jesús Pérez-Magallón McGill University Leandro Fernández de Moratín’s political profile was drawn by Luis Sánchez Agesta in his article, “Moratín and the Political Thought of Enlightened Despotism.” In this article, which is more interested in showing that the famous playwright was in favor of enlightened despotism than in exploring and analyzing Moratín’s political thinking, Sánchez Agesta links Moratín with enlightened despotism in at least three ways: First, by way of Moratín’s participation in governmental politics related to theatrical reform; second, by recalling Moratín’s friendship and intellectual rapport with some of the most representative figures of enlightened despotism; and third, “through the ideas that become clear in his correspondence and in the precepts of his Discurso preliminar ” (573). Sánchez Agesta summarizes Moratín’s ideas as follows: “the reform of customs, the law and the entire order of a society based on traditional principles in order to rebuild it on the basis of utility. Two instruments of reform that oppose the revolutionary spirit are mentioned: the actions of an enlightened government, and the soft, continuous pressure of education” (373). Beyond this brief summary, Sanchez Agesta alludes to what he calls “the pedagogical themes of Moratín’s theater.” In short, the playwright is presented as one more among many of those who shared and supported the tenets of enlightened despotism from within the specific sphere of culture; in this case from within the world of the theater. Although Sánchez Agesta adds that Moratín’s “exact place is not among the afrancesados , but rather among the men of letters of enlightened despotism’s second phase, who were supported by Manuel Godoy,” his opinion is but a complement to the label of afrancesado or collaborationist that Moratín has carried since the War of Independence. -
The Spanish Inquisition and the Converso Challenge (C
Chapter 6 The Spanish Inquisition and the Converso Challenge (c. 1480–1525): A Question of Race, Religion or Socio-political Ascendancy? Helen Rawlings 1 Introduction The Spanish Inquisition, established by papal bull on 1 November 1478, was originally set up to deal with a specific group of individuals known as conversos – Jews who had converted to Christianity either voluntarily or un- der duress in the wake of rising anti-Semitic tensions in society and who were commonly regarded as being insincere in their new faith and reverting back to their former one. At the beginning of the reign of Ferdinand and Isa- bel (1469–1516), backsliding Jews were deemed to represent a major potential threat to the stability of the new Catholic state, recently emerged from the long years of struggle against Islam, and eager to assert its dominance as both a political and religious force. So great was the monarchs’ concern, that a spe- cial institution – the Holy Office of the Inquisition – was founded to root out the incidence of heresy within the crypto-Jewish community of Spain. At the same time, this unprecedented measure served to consolidate the Crown’s control over its disparate kingdoms via a common faith. The brutal persecu- tion of converso heresy, concentrated over the next five decades (c. 1480–1525), was set to continue – against all expectations – at intermittent intervals over the following three centuries. It set an indelible stamp of infamy on the his- tory and reputation of the Spanish Inquisition that became embodied in the Black Legend – a stereotypical image of Spain as a repressive, intolerant na- tion, propagated by its Protestant enemies, which modern historiography has largely reduced to a myth. -
Intersecting Discourses of Renaissance Torture
Marshall Studies by Undergraduate Researchers at Guelph Vol. 1, No. 1, Fall 2007, 15-21 The body and truth: Intersecting discourses of Renaissance torture Laura Marshall This essay was prepared for ENGL*4040 Medieval and Early Modern Literature under the supervision of Prof. Alan Shepard, School of English and Theatre Studies, College of Arts. From the 13th to the 17th century torture became a component of the judicial system, the goal of which was to discover the veracity of the accused. Two primary, competing discourses developed in order to explain the epistemological value of torture, the dicens veritatis and the dicens dubitatis . In the first discourse, torture exists as a producer of legitimate truth, while in the second the use of torture necessarily casts doubt on the obtained confession. This essay examines the ways in which the victim can undermine the torture process through the manipulation of these discourses. This is done within the dicens veritatis when the victim claims innocence and forces the torturer to accept this as truth. Within the dicens dubitatis , this is accomplished by forcing torturers to acknowledge the flawed nature of their own discourse through the telling of lies. The first component of my examination explores the transcripts of the legal proceedings against Domenico Scandella and Jean Bourdil, identifying the differing ways these victims employ both discourses to create a resistance to the torturer’s predetermined narrative of events. The second component scrutinizes the depiction of the body within the philosophical writings of contemporary periods, thereby establishing the epistemological relationship between the body and pain. -
Francisco Goya, the American Revolution, and the Fight Against the Synarchist Beast-Man by Karel Vereycken
Click here for Full Issue of Fidelio Volume 13, Number 4, Winter 2004 Francisco Goya, the American Revolution, And the Fight Against The Synarchist Beast-Man by Karel Vereycken s in the case of Rabelais, entering the ly to reassert itself in the aftermath of the British- visual language of Francisco Goya takes orchestrated French Revolution (1789). Aan effort, something that has become Despite this political reversal, Goya continued increasingly difficult for the average Baby in his role as Court Painter to Carlos III’s succes- Boomer. By indicating some of the essential events sors. He was appointed by Carlos IV in 1789, and of Goya’s period and life, I will try to provide you then later, after the Napoleonic invasion of Spain with some of the keys that will enable you to draw in 1808 and the restoration of the Spanish Monar- the geometry of his soul, and to harmonize the chy in 1814, his appointment was reinstated by rhythm of your heart with his. King Ferdinand VII. Francisco Goya y Lucientes was born in 1746, Fighting against despotism while simultaneous- and was 13 years old when Carlos III became ly holding a sensitive post as Painter in the service King of Spain in 1759. Carlos, who was dedicated of the latter two kings—and, what’s more, stricken to the transformation of Spain out of Hapsburg with total deafness at the age of 472—Goya, like all backwardness through Colbertian policies of eco- resistance fighters, was well acquainted with the nomic and scientific development, supported the world of secrecy and deception. -
No Brainer: the Early Modern Tragedy of Torture
No Brainer: The Early Modern Tragedy of Torture James Simpson Key words Torture; Early Modern English torture; John Fortescue; Edward Coke; Francis Bacon; Thomas Smith; William Allen; Edmund Campion; Thomas Norton; King Lear; York and Wakefield Mystery Play cycles Abstract Legally-sanctioned torture for the purposes of gathering evidence is extremely rare in the Anglo-American tradition. Aside from the Bush Administration, the only other period in which legally-sanctioned torture was practiced was in early modern England, 1540-1640, concentrated in the reign of Elizabeth I. This essay initially looks to, and seeks to resolve, a paradox of early modern English torture: the torturers for the most part deny that they torture; and the tortured (for the most part Catholics) do not protest torture's illegality; instead they protest its inhumanity. After resolving the paradox, I turn to the stage, the space of play, and look to the ways in which some late medieval plays and one early modern play (King Lear) uses the play to protest the torturer's "playfulness." No Brainer: The Early Modern Tragedy of Torture1 No-one wants to talk about torture. Listen, for example, to Vice-President Dick Cheney, speaking in October 2006. Scott Hennen, a radio show host from Fargo, N.D., posed this question to the Vice-President: “Would you agree a dunk in water is a no- brainer if it can save lives?” Note, before we listen to the Vice-President’s reply, that Mr Hennen does not himself wish to talk about torture; instead 1 he reverts to an extremely common feature of torture discourse, the use of euphemism. -
1 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS 2 3 for the SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 8 (In Banc Rehearing: December 9, 2008 Decided: November 2, 2009) 9 10 Docket No
06-4216-cv Arar v. Ashcroft 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 8 (In Banc Rehearing: December 9, 2008 Decided: November 2, 2009) 9 10 Docket No. 06-4216-cv 11 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 13 14 MAHER ARAR, 15 16 Plaintiff-Appellant, 17 18 - v.- 19 20 JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the 21 United States, LARRY D. THOMPSON, 22 formerly Acting Deputy Attorney General, 23 TOM RIDGE, Secretary of Homeland Security, 24 J. SCOTT BLACKMAN, formerly Regional 25 Director of the Regional Office of 26 Immigration and Naturalization Services, 27 PAULA CORRIGAN, Regional Director of 28 Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 29 EDWARD J. MCELROY, formerly District 30 Director of Immigration and Naturalization 31 Services for New York District, and now 32 Customs Enforcement, ROBERT MUELLER, 33 Director of the Federal Bureau of 34 Investigation, John Doe 1-10, Federal 35 Bureau of Investigation and/or Immigration 36 and Naturalization Service Agents, and JAMES 37 W. ZIGLAR, formerly Commissioner for 38 Immigration and Naturalization Services, 39 United States, 40 41 Defendants-Appellees. 42 43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 1Before: JACOBS, Chief Judge, McLAUGHLIN,** CALABRESI, * 2 CABRANES, POOLER, SACK,** SOTOMAYOR,*** PARKER,** 3 RAGGI, WESLEY, HALL, and LIVINGSTON, Circuit 4 Judges. KATZMANN, Circuit Judge, took no part in 5 the consideration or decision of the case. 6 7 JACOBS, C.J., filed the majority opinion in which MCLAUGHLIN, 8 CABRANES, RAGGI, WESLEY, HALL, and LIVINGSTON, JJ., joined. 9 10 CALABRESI, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which POOLER, SACK, 11 and PARKER, JJ., joined. -
Torture Flights : North Carolina’S Role in the Cia Rendition and Torture Program the Commission the Commission
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LIST OF COMMISSIONERS 4 FOREWORD Alberto Mora, Former General Counsel, Department of the Navy 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Summary of the investigation into North Carolina’s involvement in torture and rendition by the North Carolina Commission of Inquiry on Torture (NCCIT) 8 FINDINGS 12 RECOMMENDATIONS CHAPTER ONE 14 CHAPTER SIX 39 The U.S. Government’s Rendition, Detention, Ongoing Challenges for Survivors and Interrogation (RDI) Program CHAPTER SEVEN 44 CHAPTER TWO 21 Costs and Consequences of the North Carolina’s Role in Torture: CIA’s Torture and Rendition Program Hosting Aero Contractors, Ltd. CHAPTER EIGHT 50 CHAPTER THREE 26 North Carolina Public Opposition to Other North Carolina Connections the RDI Program, and Officials’ Responses to Post-9/11 U.S. Torture CHAPTER NINE 57 CHAPTER FOUR 28 North Carolina’s Obligations under Who Were Those Rendered Domestic and International Law, the Basis by Aero Contractors? for Federal and State Investigation, and the Need for Accountability CHAPTER FIVE 34 Rendition as Torture CONCLUSION 64 ENDNOTES 66 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 78 APPENDICES 80 1 WWW.NCTORTUREREPORT.ORG TORTURE FLIGHTS : NORTH CAROLINA’S ROLE IN THE CIA RENDITION AND TORTURE PROGRAM THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION FRANK GOLDSMITH (CO-CHAIR) JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR. PATRICIA MCGAFFAGAN DR. ANNIE SPARROW MBBS, MRCP, FRACP, MPH, MD Frank Goldsmith is a mediator, arbitrator and former civil James E. Coleman, Jr. is the John S. Bradway Professor Patricia McGaffagan worked as a psychologist for twenty rights lawyer in the Asheville, NC area. Goldsmith has of the Practice of Law, Director of the Center for five years at the Johnston County, NC Mental Health Dr. -
Kent Academic Repository Full Text Document (Pdf)
Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Blakeley, Ruth and Raphael, Sam (2013) Dirty Little Secrets: State and Corporate Complicity in Rendition, Secret Detention and Torture. In: British International Studies Association Annual Conference, June 2013, Birmingham. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/44066/ Document Version Pre-print Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Dirty Little Secrets Mapping State and Corporate Complicity in the Global Rendition System The Case of the UK Ruth Blakeley, University of Kent Sam Raphael, Kingston University Paper presented at the British International Studies Association Annual Conference Birmingham, 20 June 2013 Draft: Please seek permission from the authors before citing or circulating Abstract Based on a comprehensive investigation into the nature and evolution of the global rendition system, this paper seeks to provide an account of the extent of British involvement in and knowledge of that system. -
The Ruin of a State Is Freedom of Conscience: Religion, (In)Tolerance, and Independence in the Spanish Monarchy
Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Journal of the Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Volume 44 Issue 1 Iberia in Entangled and Transnational Article 4 Contexts 2019 The Ruin of a State is Freedom of Conscience: Religion, (In)Tolerance, and Independence in the Spanish Monarchy Scott Eastman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.asphs.net/bsphs Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Eastman, Scott (2019) "The Ruin of a State is Freedom of Conscience: Religion, (In)Tolerance, and Independence in the Spanish Monarchy," Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies: Vol. 44 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. https://doi.org/10.26431/0739-182X.1328 Available at: https://digitalcommons.asphs.net/bsphs/vol44/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies by an authorized editor of Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ruin of a State is Freedom of Conscience: Religion, (In)Tolerance, and Independence in the Spanish Monarchy Scott Eastman During the reign of Charles III (1759-1788), the Bourbon Monarchy, unlike the more reactionary Bourbon regime north of the Pyrenees, allied with partisans of reform, including prominent Jansenists.1 Spaniards read the works of Montesquieu and Adam Smith, and their texts circulated despite censorship and the prying eyes of inquisitors.2 Ministers pushed through educational changes, economic societies were founded to advance agriculture and industry, and prominent women such as Josefa Amar began to have a greater voice in the public sphere, exemplifying an age of experimentation and change that would culminate in a cycle of revolution and reaction. -
The Inquisition: a Global History, 1478-1834 Francisco Bethencourt Frontmatter More Information
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-74823-0 - The Inquisition: A Global History, 1478-1834 Francisco Bethencourt Frontmatter More information The Inquisition The Inquisition was the most powerful disciplinary institution in the early modern world, responsible for 300,000 trials and over 1.5 million denunciations. How did it root itself in different social and ethnic environments? Why did it last for three centuries? What cultural, social and political changes led to its abolition? In this first global comparative study, Francisco Bethencourt examines the Inquisition’s activities in Spain, Italy, Portugal and overseas Iberian colonies. He demonstrates that the Inquisition played a crucial role in the Catholic Reformation, imposing its own members in papal elections, reshaping ecclesiastical hierarchy, defining orthodoxy, controlling information and knowledge, influencing politics and framing daily life. He challenges both traditionalist and revisionist perceptions of the tribunal. Bethencourt shows the Inquisition as an ever evolving body, eager to enlarge jurisdiction and obtain political support to implement its system of values, but also vulnerable to manipulation by rulers, cardinals, and local social elites. francisco bethencourt is Charles Boxer Professor of History at King’s College London. His previous publications include (as co-editor) Portuguese Oceanic Expansion, 1400–1800 (2007) and Cultural Exchange in Early Modern Europe, Volume III: Correspondence and Cultural Exchange in Europe, 1400–1700 (2007). © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-74823-0 - The Inquisition: A Global History, 1478-1834 Francisco Bethencourt Frontmatter More information Past and Present Publications General Editors: LYNDAL ROPER, University of Oxford, and CHRIS WICKHAM, University of Birmingham Past and Present Publications comprise books similar in character to the articles in the journal Past and Present. -
April 21, 1967 Shock Opportunism and the Greek Junta
Yannick Verberckmoes 00903164 Master Program in American Studies Academic year: 2013-2014 April 21, 1967 Shock Opportunism and the Greek Junta Supervisor: Prof. Dr. J. Ken Kennard In this thesis we will investigate the concept of shock opportunism relating to the Greek colonels’ regime, that governed Greece from 1967 to 1974. Shock opportunism is defined as the use of a possibly premeditated collective shock, e.g. a natural disaster, war or coup d’état, as an opportunity to radically implement neoliberal economic reforms. On the one hand we will look at why and how this was done and on the other, we will link the case of Greece to similar examples of authoritarian regimes during the Cold War to come to a better analysis of this dark period in Greek history. Although writing a thesis is a very solitary endeavor, its merits can never be accredited to just one person. I would therefore like to express my gratitude to the following people: Prof. Dr. J. Ken Kennard: for yelling at me for about thirty minutes one week after the Easter break and explaining to me in quite straightforward English that my first draft still needed a lot of work, as this was a testimony to the great care and effort he displayed in helping me throughout the research and writing process. Prof. Dr. Victor Gavin: for his useful advice. Gizem Özbeko ğlu: for her undying support and access to the library of Boğaziçi University (Istanbul). Both of which were absolutely essential to the completion of this dissertation. Jannik Held: for introducing me to Naomi Klein’s book The Shock Doctrine over a couple of beers. -
Taking Psychological Torture Seriously
University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2019 Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment John Bessler University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation John Bessler, Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment, 11 Northeastern University Law Review 1 (2019). Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac/1080 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOL. 11, NO. 1 NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1 Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment By John D. Bessler* * Associate Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law; Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University Law Center; Visiting Scholar/Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, University of Minnesota Law School (Spring 2018); Of Counsel, Berens & Miller, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2 Bessler Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................................................................3 II. The Illegality and Torturous Nature of Threats of Death ....... 14 A. Existing Legal Protections Against Death Threats Against Individuals.................................................................................... 14 B. Death Threats, Persecution, and the U.S.