DOCSLIB.ORG

1 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS 2 3 for the SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 8 (In Banc Rehearing: December 9, 2008 Decided: November 2, 2009) 9 10 Docket No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS 2 3 for the SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 8 (In Banc Rehearing: December 9, 2008 Decided: November 2, 2009) 9 10 Docket No 06-4216-cv Arar v. Ashcroft 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 8 (In Banc Rehearing: December 9, 2008 Decided: November 2, 2009) 9 10 Docket No. 06-4216-cv 11 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 13 14 MAHER ARAR, 15 16 Plaintiff-Appellant, 17 18 - v.- 19 20 JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the 21 United States, LARRY D. THOMPSON, 22 formerly Acting Deputy Attorney General, 23 TOM RIDGE, Secretary of Homeland Security, 24 J. SCOTT BLACKMAN, formerly Regional 25 Director of the Regional Office of 26 Immigration and Naturalization Services, 27 PAULA CORRIGAN, Regional Director of 28 Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 29 EDWARD J. MCELROY, formerly District 30 Director of Immigration and Naturalization 31 Services for New York District, and now 32 Customs Enforcement, ROBERT MUELLER, 33 Director of the Federal Bureau of 34 Investigation, John Doe 1-10, Federal 35 Bureau of Investigation and/or Immigration 36 and Naturalization Service Agents, and JAMES 37 W. ZIGLAR, formerly Commissioner for 38 Immigration and Naturalization Services, 39 United States, 40 41 Defendants-Appellees. 42 43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 1Before: JACOBS, Chief Judge, McLAUGHLIN,** CALABRESI, * 2 CABRANES, POOLER, SACK,** SOTOMAYOR,*** PARKER,** 3 RAGGI, WESLEY, HALL, and LIVINGSTON, Circuit 4 Judges. KATZMANN, Circuit Judge, took no part in 5 the consideration or decision of the case. 6 7 JACOBS, C.J., filed the majority opinion in which MCLAUGHLIN, 8 CABRANES, RAGGI, WESLEY, HALL, and LIVINGSTON, JJ., joined. 9 10 CALABRESI, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which POOLER, SACK, 11 and PARKER, JJ., joined. 12 13 POOLER, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which CALABRESI, SACK, 14 and PARKER, JJ., joined. 15 16 SACK, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which CALABRESI, POOLER, 17 and PARKER, JJ., joined. 18 19 PARKER, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which CALABRESI, 20 POOLER, and SACK, JJ., joined. 21 22 23 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court 24 for the Eastern District of New York (Trager, J.) dismissing 25 Plaintiff-Appellant Maher Arar’s complaint against John * Senior Circuit Judge McLaughlin was a member of the initial three-judge panel that heard this appeal and is therefore eligible to participate in in banc rehearing. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)(1). ** Senior Circuit Judges Calabresi, Sack, and Parker, who assumed senior status during the course of in banc proceedings, are entitled to participate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)(2). *** The Honorable Sonia Sotomayor, who was originally a member of the in banc panel and who participated in oral argument, was elevated to the Supreme Court on August 8, 2009. 2 1 Ashcroft, the Attorney General of the United States; Tom Ridge, 2 the Secretary of Homeland Security; Robert Mueller, the Director 3 of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and others. Arar v. 4 Ashcroft, 414 F. Supp. 2d 250 (E.D.N.Y. 2006). Arar alleges 5 that he was detained while changing planes at Kennedy Airport in 6 New York (based on a warning from Canadian authorities that he 7 was a member of Al Qaeda), mistreated for twelve days while in 8 United States custody, and then removed to Syria via Jordan 9 pursuant to an inter-governmental understanding that he would be 10 detained and interrogated under torture by Syrian officials. 11 12 Arar’s complaint alleges violations of the Torture Victim 13 Protection Act (“TVPA”) and the Fifth Amendment. The District 14 Court dismissed the complaint. Id. at 287-88. A three-judge 15 panel of this Court unanimously held that: (1) the District 16 Court had personal jurisdiction over Thompson, Ashcroft, and 17 Mueller; (2) Arar failed to state a claim under the TVPA; and 18 (3) Arar failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction over 19 his request for a declaratory judgment. Arar v. Ashcroft, 532 20 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2008). A majority of the panel also dismissed 21 Arar’s Bivens claims, with one member of the panel dissenting. 22 Id. After in banc rehearing, the panel opinion is vacated and 3 1 the judgment of the district court is affirmed. 2 DAVID COLE (Maria Couri LaHood, 3 Jules Lobel, Katherine Gallagher, on 4 the brief), Center for 5 Constitutional Rights, New York, NY; 6 Joshua S. Sohn (on the brief), DLA 7 Piper US LLP, New York, NY, for 8 Plaintiff-Appellant. 9 10 JONATHAN F. COHN, Deputy Assistant 11 Attorney General (Gregory G. Katsas, 12 Assistant Attorney General; Benton 13 J. Campbell, United States Attorney; 14 Larry Lee Gregg, R. Joseph Sher, 15 Dennis C. Barghaan, Assistant United 16 States Attorneys; Mary Hampton 17 Mason, Jeremy S. Brumbelow, U.S. 18 Department of Justice, Civil 19 Division, Torts Branch; Barbara L. 20 Herwig, Robert M. Loeb, Michael 21 Abate, U.S. Department of Justice, 22 Civil Division, Appellate Staff, on 23 the brief), for Defendant-Appellee 24 John Ashcroft, the official capacity 25 Defendants-Appellees, and the United 26 States. 27 28 JEREMY A. LAMKEN (John J. Cassidy, 29 Jamie S. Kilberg, Paul J. Nathanson, 30 on the brief), Baker Botts L.L.P., 31 Washington D.C.; Stephen L. Braga 32 (on the brief), Ropes & Gray L.L.P., 33 Washington D.C., 34 for Defendant-Appellee Larry D. 35 Thompson. 36 37 Robin L. Goldfaden, American 38 Civil Liberties Union Foundation, 39 Immigrants’ Rights Project, San 40 Francisco, CA, for Amici Curiae 41 American Civil Liberties Union and 42 New York Civil Liberties Union in 43 support of Plaintiff-Appellant. 4 1 Burt Neuborne, New York, NY, for 2 Amici Curiae Norman Dorsen, Helen 3 Hershkoff, Frank Michelman, Burt 4 Neuborne, and David L. Shapiro, in 5 support of Plaintiff-Appellant. 6 7 Michael B. De Leeuw, Dale E. Ho, 8 Jonathan J. Smith, Fried, Frank, 9 Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New 10 York, NY, for Amicus Curiae NAACP 11 Legal Defense & Educational Fund, 12 Inc. in support of Plaintiff- 13 Appellant. 14 15 Sidney S. Rosdeitcher, Paul, 16 Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison 17 LLP, New York, NY, for Amici Curiae 18 Retired Federal Judges in support of 19 Plaintiff-Appellant. 20 21 Nancy Morawetz, New York University 22 School of Law, New York, NY, for 23 Amici Curiae Law Professors in 24 support of Plaintiff-Appellant. 25 26 Alexander Yanos, Freshfields 27 Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, New York, 28 NY, for Amicus Curiae Redress Trust 29 in support of Plaintiff-Appellant. 30 31 32 33 DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: 34 35 Maher Arar appeals from a judgment of the United States 36 District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Trager, J.) 37 dismissing his complaint against the Attorney General of the 38 United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director 39 of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and others, including 5 1 senior immigration officials. Arar alleges that he was detained 2 while changing planes at Kennedy Airport in New York (based on a 3 warning from Canadian authorities that he was a member of Al 4 Qaeda), mistreated for twelve days while in United States 5 custody, and then removed to Syria via Jordan pursuant to an 6 inter-governmental understanding that he would be detained and 7 interrogated under torture by Syrian officials. The complaint 8 alleges a violation of the Torture Victim Protection Act 9 (“TVPA”) and of his Fifth Amendment substantive due process 10 rights arising from the conditions of his detention in the 11 United States, the denial of his access to counsel and to the 12 courts while in the United States, and his detention and torture 13 in Syria. 14 The district court dismissed the complaint (with leave to 15 re-plead only as to the conditions of detention in the United 16 States and his access to counsel and the courts during that 17 period) and Arar timely appealed (without undertaking to amend). 18 Arar v. Ashcroft, 414 F. Supp. 2d 250 (E.D.N.Y. 2006). A three- 19 judge panel of this Court unanimously held that: (1) the 20 District Court had personal jurisdiction over Thompson, 21 Ashcroft, and Mueller; (2) Arar failed to state a claim under 22 the TVPA; and (3) Arar failed to establish subject matter 6 1 jurisdiction over his request for a declaratory judgment. Arar 2 v. Ashcroft, 532 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2008). A majority of the 3 panel also dismissed Arar’s Bivens claims, with one member of 4 the panel dissenting. Id. The Court voted to rehear the appeal 5 in banc. We now affirm. 6 We have no trouble affirming the district court’s 7 conclusions that Arar sufficiently alleged personal jurisdiction 8 over the defendants who challenged it, and that Arar lacks 9 standing to seek declaratory relief. We do not reach issues of 10 qualified immunity or the state secrets privilege. As to the 11 TVPA, we agree with the unanimous position of the panel that 12 Arar insufficiently pleaded that the alleged conduct of United 13 States officials was done under color of foreign law. We agree 14 with the district court that Arar insufficiently pleaded his 15 claim regarding detention in the United States, a ruling that 16 has been reinforced by the subsequent authority of Bell Atlantic 17 Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). Our attention is 18 therefore focused on whether Arar’s claims for detention and 19 torture in Syria can be asserted under Bivens v. Six Unknown 20 Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) 21 (“Bivens”).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intersecting Discourses of Renaissance Torture
    Marshall Studies by Undergraduate Researchers at Guelph Vol. 1, No. 1, Fall 2007, 15-21 The body and truth: Intersecting discourses of Renaissance torture Laura Marshall This essay was prepared for ENGL*4040 Medieval and Early Modern Literature under the supervision of Prof. Alan Shepard, School of English and Theatre Studies, College of Arts. From the 13th to the 17th century torture became a component of the judicial system, the goal of which was to discover the veracity of the accused. Two primary, competing discourses developed in order to explain the epistemological value of torture, the dicens veritatis and the dicens dubitatis . In the first discourse, torture exists as a producer of legitimate truth, while in the second the use of torture necessarily casts doubt on the obtained confession. This essay examines the ways in which the victim can undermine the torture process through the manipulation of these discourses. This is done within the dicens veritatis when the victim claims innocence and forces the torturer to accept this as truth. Within the dicens dubitatis , this is accomplished by forcing torturers to acknowledge the flawed nature of their own discourse through the telling of lies. The first component of my examination explores the transcripts of the legal proceedings against Domenico Scandella and Jean Bourdil, identifying the differing ways these victims employ both discourses to create a resistance to the torturer’s predetermined narrative of events. The second component scrutinizes the depiction of the body within the philosophical writings of contemporary periods, thereby establishing the epistemological relationship between the body and pain.
    [Show full text]
  • No Brainer: the Early Modern Tragedy of Torture
    No Brainer: The Early Modern Tragedy of Torture James Simpson Key words Torture; Early Modern English torture; John Fortescue; Edward Coke; Francis Bacon; Thomas Smith; William Allen; Edmund Campion; Thomas Norton; King Lear; York and Wakefield Mystery Play cycles Abstract Legally-sanctioned torture for the purposes of gathering evidence is extremely rare in the Anglo-American tradition. Aside from the Bush Administration, the only other period in which legally-sanctioned torture was practiced was in early modern England, 1540-1640, concentrated in the reign of Elizabeth I. This essay initially looks to, and seeks to resolve, a paradox of early modern English torture: the torturers for the most part deny that they torture; and the tortured (for the most part Catholics) do not protest torture's illegality; instead they protest its inhumanity. After resolving the paradox, I turn to the stage, the space of play, and look to the ways in which some late medieval plays and one early modern play (King Lear) uses the play to protest the torturer's "playfulness." No Brainer: The Early Modern Tragedy of Torture1 No-one wants to talk about torture. Listen, for example, to Vice-President Dick Cheney, speaking in October 2006. Scott Hennen, a radio show host from Fargo, N.D., posed this question to the Vice-President: “Would you agree a dunk in water is a no- brainer if it can save lives?” Note, before we listen to the Vice-President’s reply, that Mr Hennen does not himself wish to talk about torture; instead 1 he reverts to an extremely common feature of torture discourse, the use of euphemism.
    [Show full text]
  • Torture Flights : North Carolina’S Role in the Cia Rendition and Torture Program the Commission the Commission
    TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LIST OF COMMISSIONERS 4 FOREWORD Alberto Mora, Former General Counsel, Department of the Navy 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Summary of the investigation into North Carolina’s involvement in torture and rendition by the North Carolina Commission of Inquiry on Torture (NCCIT) 8 FINDINGS 12 RECOMMENDATIONS CHAPTER ONE 14 CHAPTER SIX 39 The U.S. Government’s Rendition, Detention, Ongoing Challenges for Survivors and Interrogation (RDI) Program CHAPTER SEVEN 44 CHAPTER TWO 21 Costs and Consequences of the North Carolina’s Role in Torture: CIA’s Torture and Rendition Program Hosting Aero Contractors, Ltd. CHAPTER EIGHT 50 CHAPTER THREE 26 North Carolina Public Opposition to Other North Carolina Connections the RDI Program, and Officials’ Responses to Post-9/11 U.S. Torture CHAPTER NINE 57 CHAPTER FOUR 28 North Carolina’s Obligations under Who Were Those Rendered Domestic and International Law, the Basis by Aero Contractors? for Federal and State Investigation, and the Need for Accountability CHAPTER FIVE 34 Rendition as Torture CONCLUSION 64 ENDNOTES 66 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 78 APPENDICES 80 1 WWW.NCTORTUREREPORT.ORG TORTURE FLIGHTS : NORTH CAROLINA’S ROLE IN THE CIA RENDITION AND TORTURE PROGRAM THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION THE COMMISSION FRANK GOLDSMITH (CO-CHAIR) JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR. PATRICIA MCGAFFAGAN DR. ANNIE SPARROW MBBS, MRCP, FRACP, MPH, MD Frank Goldsmith is a mediator, arbitrator and former civil James E. Coleman, Jr. is the John S. Bradway Professor Patricia McGaffagan worked as a psychologist for twenty rights lawyer in the Asheville, NC area. Goldsmith has of the Practice of Law, Director of the Center for five years at the Johnston County, NC Mental Health Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Academic Repository Full Text Document (Pdf)
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Blakeley, Ruth and Raphael, Sam (2013) Dirty Little Secrets: State and Corporate Complicity in Rendition, Secret Detention and Torture. In: British International Studies Association Annual Conference, June 2013, Birmingham. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/44066/ Document Version Pre-print Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Dirty Little Secrets Mapping State and Corporate Complicity in the Global Rendition System The Case of the UK Ruth Blakeley, University of Kent Sam Raphael, Kingston University Paper presented at the British International Studies Association Annual Conference Birmingham, 20 June 2013 Draft: Please seek permission from the authors before citing or circulating Abstract Based on a comprehensive investigation into the nature and evolution of the global rendition system, this paper seeks to provide an account of the extent of British involvement in and knowledge of that system.
    [Show full text]
  • April 21, 1967 Shock Opportunism and the Greek Junta
    Yannick Verberckmoes 00903164 Master Program in American Studies Academic year: 2013-2014 April 21, 1967 Shock Opportunism and the Greek Junta Supervisor: Prof. Dr. J. Ken Kennard In this thesis we will investigate the concept of shock opportunism relating to the Greek colonels’ regime, that governed Greece from 1967 to 1974. Shock opportunism is defined as the use of a possibly premeditated collective shock, e.g. a natural disaster, war or coup d’état, as an opportunity to radically implement neoliberal economic reforms. On the one hand we will look at why and how this was done and on the other, we will link the case of Greece to similar examples of authoritarian regimes during the Cold War to come to a better analysis of this dark period in Greek history. Although writing a thesis is a very solitary endeavor, its merits can never be accredited to just one person. I would therefore like to express my gratitude to the following people: Prof. Dr. J. Ken Kennard: for yelling at me for about thirty minutes one week after the Easter break and explaining to me in quite straightforward English that my first draft still needed a lot of work, as this was a testimony to the great care and effort he displayed in helping me throughout the research and writing process. Prof. Dr. Victor Gavin: for his useful advice. Gizem Özbeko ğlu: for her undying support and access to the library of Boğaziçi University (Istanbul). Both of which were absolutely essential to the completion of this dissertation. Jannik Held: for introducing me to Naomi Klein’s book The Shock Doctrine over a couple of beers.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Psychological Torture Seriously
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2019 Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment John Bessler University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation John Bessler, Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment, 11 Northeastern University Law Review 1 (2019). Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac/1080 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOL. 11, NO. 1 NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1 Taking Psychological Torture Seriously: The Torturous Nature of Credible Death Threats and the Collateral Consequences for Capital Punishment By John D. Bessler* * Associate Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law; Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University Law Center; Visiting Scholar/Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, University of Minnesota Law School (Spring 2018); Of Counsel, Berens & Miller, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2 Bessler Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................................................................3 II. The Illegality and Torturous Nature of Threats of Death ....... 14 A. Existing Legal Protections Against Death Threats Against Individuals.................................................................................... 14 B. Death Threats, Persecution, and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tortured Testimonies
    ACTA HISTRIAE • 19 • 2011 • 3 received: 2010-02-14 UDC 343.102:930.2"15/16" original scientific article TORTURED TESTIMONIES John JEFFRIES MARTIN Duke University, History Department, 114 Campus Drive, Box 90719, NC 27708 Durham, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Manuals of jurisprudence in early modern Europe stipulated that the notary rec- ord not only the words but also the grimaces and the screams of the defendant during interrogations under torture. This paper explores these "tortured testimonies" from the Roman Inquisition, problematizes them as historical sources, and offers sugges- tions about how historians might approach them. The article examines the documents under two lights: (1) in relation to the institutional structures and protocols which gave them their particular form; and (2) in relation to the cultural assumptions that shaped a ritual in which pain was seen as an index of the conscience of the accused. Key words: inquisition, torture, testimony, notary, pain, trauma TORTURA E DEPOSIZIONI SINTESI I manuali di giurisprudenza risalenti agli inizi dell'Europa moderna stabilivano che il notaio registrasse non solo le parole ma anche le espressioni facciali e le grida dell'accusato durante gli interrogatori sotto tortura. L'articolo esplora alcune deposizioni sotto tortura presso l'Inquisizione romana, problematizzandole come fonti storiche e proponendo suggerimenti sulle modalità di accostamento a esse da parte degli storici. L'articolo esamina i documenti sotto due ottiche, vale a dire: (1) in relazione alle strutture istituzionali e ai protocolli che stanno alla base della loro forma peculiare; (2) in relazione alle assunzioni culturali che davano forma a un rituale in cui il dolore era visto come indice della coscienza dell'accusato.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pit and the Pendulum Story Quest
    The pit and the pendulum story quest Continue Introduction: Edgar Allan Poe Yam and pendulum set against the backdrop of the Spanish Inquisition. Throughout this WebQuest, you will become familiar with the Inquisition and why Po used it as the subject of his terrible story. Title Replies Views Last post Welcome to Dark Tales: Edgar Allan Poe's Pit and Pendulum Collector's Edition Forum 1,787 Please follow any TECH ISSUES for dark fairy tales: Edgar Allan Poe's Pit and Pendulum CE here. 20 3,057 Please answer your REVIEWS for dark fairy tales: Edgar Allan Poe in the pit and the CE pendulum here. 15 1,627 Dark Tales Series List 2 562 Bonus Games 3,935 Bonus Games Help Please 5 1178 Skull at the bottom of the cave 0 277 Runtime Bug 1 373 It needs an antibotic 1,489 This is where I go 0 414 Achievements 0 482 Skull in the Cave Bottom 0 0 0 314 2 achievements left (except gramophone) 5 1026 Piano Music 0 452 Skull Game 1,454 Bonus Game 4 630 bonus game 1,558 Can't break a bottle in the basement 1 416 Dark Tales: Edgar Allan Poe's Pit and Pendulum Collector's Edition 1,828 Can't Play 3,638 KEY: Unread Sticky Locked Ad Moved Moderator In preparation for lesson, review of online version of Pit and pendulum story by Edgar Allan Poe Yam and Pendulum Text Check Visual Poe More Visuals As you look at visual effects playing in the background to set the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sites: Torture's Hidden Infrastructure
    Catherine Slessor A new book gives a glimpse of the hidden infrastructure of torture operated by the CIA in its war on terror EDMUND CLARK Against my better judgement, I once visited the transferred without legal process. No public records Museum of Torture in Amsterdam. An early pioneer were kept as prisoners were shuttled all over the in the field of medieval barbarity tourism, it proudly world, from sites as disparate as Lithuania and ‘showcases’ a grotesquely impressive array of Afghanistan. Many remain unaccounted for. torture and punishment devices, from the Inquisition In its bureaucratic proscriptions for the treatment chair (studded with spikes, naturally) to the of detainees, the system of extraordinary rendition guillotine, France’s preferred method of despatching is beyond anything Kafka could have devised. And, miscreants until 1981. as Kafka knew, horror is all the more horrific when One obvious aim of such luridly titillating cloaked in ordinariness, effectively hidden in plain museological tableaux is to make us feel a bit better sight. Most black sites were unremarkable, with about ourselves. The average barbarity tourist buildings adapted as required. Interrogations could emerges from their murky odyssey confident in the be (and were) carried out in hotel bedrooms. In belief that state-sponsored torture, in its classic one instance, a riding school in a Lithuanian forest sense of medieval racking and whipping, belongs to (pictured) was extended with mysterious rapidity. a more primitive era of ignorance and superstition. Locals had suspicions, but none knew for sure it was Moreover, the concept of a torture chamber is no a detention centre managed on behalf of the CIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetual Impunity: Lessons Learned from the Global System of Rendition and Secret Detention
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Blakeley, Ruth and Rapahel, Sam (2014) Perpetual Impunity: Lessons learned from the global system of rendition and secret detention. In: British International Studies Association Annual Conference, 18-20 June 2014, Dublin. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/42793/ Document Version Draft Version Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Perpetual Impunity: Lessons learned from the global system of rendition and secret detention Dr Ruth Blakeley, University of Kent Dr Sam Raphael, Kingston University Paper presented at the British International Studies Association Annual Conference, Dublin 18-20 June 2014 Draft: Please seek permission from the authors before citing or circulating Abstract It is now well documented that the Blair government was colluding at the highest levels in the global system for the rendition, detention and interrogation of terror suspects, at the same time as repeatedly denying any involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congressional Investigation of Liberated Concentration Camps in 1945 Benjamin A
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2012 "Organized Crime Against Civilization": The Congressional Investigation of Liberated Concentration Camps in 1945 Benjamin A. Lindsey University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the European History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Lindsey, Benjamin A., ""Organized Crime Against Civilization": The onC gressional Investigation of Liberated Concentration Camps in 1945" (2012). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 381. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/381 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “ORGANIZED CRIME AGAINST CIVILIZATION”: THE CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION OF LIBERATED CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN 1945 A Thesis Presented by Benjamin A. Lindsey to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Specializing in History May 2012 Accepted by the Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, specializing in History. Thesis Examination Committee: Advisor Nicole Phelps, Ph.D. Jonathan Huener, Ph.D. Chairperson Lutz Kaelber, Ph.D. Dean, Graduate College Domenico Grasso, Ph.D. Date: March 27, 2012 Abstract This study examines the congressional mission to liberated concentration camps in April and May 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Inquisition
    Richard Kagan and Abigail Dyer, ed., Inquisitorial Inquiries: Brief Lives of Secret Jews and Other Heretics (2nd ed., Johns Hopkins 10 Inquisitorial Inquiries· University Press, 2011). ll The Spanish Inquisition The common denominator linking these diverse lives is, of course, the Spanish Inquisition, otherwise known as the Holy Office of the Inquisition (Santo Oficio de la Inquisici6n). No matter how unusual the case before it, the Holy Office acted in accordance with a consistent set of internal procedures that applied equally to all of its far-flung tribunals. Integral to these procedures 'I . was the requirement that its judges collect detailed information about every I · individual it prosecuted, a stipulation that harks back to the beginnings ofthe ! institution itself. i ' The Spanish Inquisition belonged to a long line of ecclesiastical tribunals, also called inquisitions, that the papacy created for the purpose of extirpating heresy from within the confines of Christendom. The name Inquisition derives from inquisitio, a particular form of juridical procedure that evolved out of earlier Roman practices and found its way into the canon law of the medieval I church. This procedure, utilized only in exceptional circumstances, empow­ ! ered the presiding judge or judges to order arrests, gather evidence, interrogate ! witnesses, and render judgment, that is, to direct the entire court proceeding. The papacy first deployed this legal weapon in the late twelfth century against deviant communities of monks and nuns and then, with greater determina­ tion, at the start of the thirteenth century against Cathar heretics gathered in southwestern France. Subsequently, it authorized individual bishops to in­ stitute inquisitorial tribunals whenever the need arose.
    [Show full text]