DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhythms of Information Infrastructure Cultivation: the Case of E-Mobility in Berlin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhythms of Information Infrastructure Cultivation: the Case of E-Mobility in Berlin The London School of Economics and Political Science Rhythms of Information Infrastructure Cultivation: The Case of e-Mobility in Berlin Ayesha Khanna A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The London School of Economics and Political Science Information Systems and Innovation Group Department of Management 6 May 2018 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 68,742 words. 2 This PhD is dedicated to Aba and Ami, my loving parents Javed and Farida Malik … … and to my wonderful husband Parag Khanna and our dear children Zara and Zubin. 3 Abstract This thesis investigates the importance of temporal rhythms in the study of information infrastructures (IIs), responding to the call to address an II’s “biography” by focusing on its evolution over time. It enriches understanding of how socially constructed rhythms, a temporal structure under-examined in the II literature, influence II cultivation. A strategic niche project to develop an e-mobility II in Berlin is used as the case study and reveals the influence of rhythm in disciplining (constraining) and modeling (motivating) II cultivation. It demonstrates how the intermediary may mediate these influences through the interventions of harmonising, riffing and composing. Based on these interventions, the study develops the concept of facilitated II cultivation, which adds to the emergent literature exploring the tension between planned and emergent infrastructure work. In doing so, the study presents a framework that helps combine short-term implementation concerns (strategic interventions by the intermediary) with long-term path dependency and evolutionary concerns (influences of past and future temporal rhythms) for IIs. 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my excellent advisor Will Venters for his supervision and encouragement throughout my PhD study at the London School of Economics. I would like to thank the Information Systems and Management Department for providing an invaluable learning environment of critical thinking, debate and insight, and the stakeholders of the BeMobility project for their time. My thanks also to my parents-in-law Manjula and Sushil Khanna and my extended family for their support. 5 Index Declaration .......................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 5 Index ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 10 List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 11 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 12 1.1. Motivation and Scope ........................................................................................ 14 1.2. ResearcH ProJect ................................................................................................. 18 1.2.1. Theoretical Framework and Research Questions ......................................... 18 1.2.2. Case Study ....................................................................................................................... 20 1.2.3. Contributions ................................................................................................................. 22 1.3. THesis Outline ...................................................................................................... 24 2. Literature Review ...................................................................................................... 29 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 29 2.2 Conceptualising Information Infrastructures (IIs) .................................. 30 2.2.1 The Challenge of Complexity in IIs ........................................................................ 31 2.2.2 The Weight and Cultivation of the Installed Base .......................................... 33 2.2.3 Technology Traps and Lock-in ............................................................................... 35 2.2.4 The Bootstrapping Problem ..................................................................................... 37 2.2.5 Tensions Between Managed and Bottom-up Cultivation ............................ 39 2.3 CSCW ResearcH on IIs ......................................................................................... 43 2.3.1 II Cultivation as Emergent and Highly Contextualised ................................. 44 2.3.2 The Role of People ........................................................................................................ 47 2.3.2 The Role of Materiality ............................................................................................... 48 2.3.3 The Role of Temporality ............................................................................................ 50 2.3.4 The Role of the Urban Context ................................................................................ 54 2.4 Strategic NicHe Management ResearcH on Urban IIs ............................... 56 2.4.1 The Concept of the Strategic Niche ....................................................................... 57 2.4.2 Intermediaries and Coordination .......................................................................... 62 6 2.5 Summary and ResearcH Questions ................................................................ 65 3. Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................... 68 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 68 3.2 Sociomaterial Perspective ................................................................................ 69 3.3 TricHordal Temporal ApproacH to Digital Coordination ....................... 72 3.3.1 The Mangle of Practice ............................................................................................... 73 3.3.2 The Trichordal View of Temporality .................................................................... 76 3.3.4 A Rhythmic View of Time .......................................................................................... 79 3.4 Exploring Temporal RHytHms ......................................................................... 80 3.4.1: Perceptions of Time ................................................................................................... 81 3.4.2: Conceptualising Rhythms ........................................................................................ 84 3.5. An EnricHed Theoretical framework ........................................................... 91 3.5.1 Relationship between Conceptual Concepts ..................................................... 93 3.5.2 Refined Research Questions .................................................................................... 94 3.6 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 95 4.MetHodology ................................................................................................................. 96 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 96 4.2 Epistemology: Social Constructionism ......................................................... 97 4.3 THeoretical Perspective .................................................................................... 99 4.3.1 Interpretivism ................................................................................................................ 99 4.3.2 The Processual Approach ....................................................................................... 100 4.4 MetHodology: Case Study ResearcH ............................................................. 103 4.4.1 The Case Study Approach ...................................................................................... 103 4.4.2 Choice of Case Study ................................................................................................. 104 4.4.3 Research Design ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Mobility Plans National Approaches and Local Practice
    Urban Mobility Plans National Approaches and Local Practice Moving Towards Strategic, Sustainable and Inclusive Urban Transport Planning Sustainable Urban Transport Technical Document #13 Published by About the authors Dr-Ing. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker (Rupprecht Consult) is in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Jharkhand, a planner, specialised on urban mobility planning. After covering areas such as bus rapid transit, street design, receiving her diploma Susanne joined the Wuppertal parking management, and transit-oriented development. Institute (WI) for Climate, Environment and Energy. In Before joining ITDP, Chris worked for the Transportation her latest position at the WI she was the co-director of and Land Use Coalition (now Transform) in Oakland; the the research unit “Energy, transport and climate policy” Metropolitan Transportation Commission, also in Oak- with around 50 employees. She was responsible for the land; the City of Berkeley’s Planning Department; Meyer, coordination and management of transport research Mohadddes Associates, Los Angeles; and Delin Consult in related projects and was involved in several national and Accra. Chris received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees international projects about sustainable and low carbon in environmental policy from the Earth Systems Pro- transportation on different political levels. gram at Stanford University. Being a Rupprecht Consult staff member (www.rup- Mathias Merforth joined the Transport Policy Advi- precht-consult.eu) since 2013, Susanne currently coor- sory Services team at GIZ after receiving his diploma in dinates the EU-funded project CH4LLENGE which transport economics in 2013. For his thesis at Technical concentrates on policies to improve transport planning University Dresden he analysed the regulatory, financial processes in European cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin by Sustainable Transport
    WWW.GERMAN-SUSTAINABLE-MOBILITY.DE Discover Berlin by Sustainable Transport THE SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT GUIDE GERMANY The German Partnership for Sustainable Mobility (GPSM) The German Partnership for Sustainable Mobility (GPSM) serves as a guide for sustainable mobility and green logistics solutions from Germany. As a platform for exchanging knowledge, expertise and experiences, GPSM supports the transformation towards sustainability worldwide. It serves as a network of information from academia, businesses, civil society and associations. The GPSM supports the implementation of sustainable mobility and green logistics solutions in a comprehensive manner. In cooperation with various stakeholders from economic, scientific and societal backgrounds, the broad range of possible concepts, measures and technologies in the transport sector can be explored and prepared for implementation. The GPSM is a reliable and inspiring network that offers access to expert knowledge, as well as networking formats. The GPSM is comprised of more than 150 reputable stakeholders in Germany. The GPSM is part of Germany’s aspiration to be a trailblazer in progressive climate policy, and in follow-up to the Rio+20 process, to lead other international forums on sustainable development as well as in European integration. Integrity and respect are core principles of our partnership values and mission. The transferability of concepts and ideas hinges upon respecting local and regional diversity, skillsets and experien- ces, as well as acknowledging their unique constraints. www.german-sustainable-mobility.de Discover Berlin by Sustainable Transport This guide to Berlin’s intermodal transportation system leads you from the main train station to the transport hub of Alexanderplatz, to the redeveloped Potsdamer Platz with its high-qua- lity architecture before ending the tour in the trendy borough of Kreuzberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport in the World's Major Cities
    Feature Evolution of Urban Railways (part 2) Rail Transport in The World’s Major Cities Takao Okamoto and Norihisa Tadakoshi Many of the world’s large cities grew in development, particularly with regard to American city; and Hong Kong, Seoul and conjunction with railways, and today, the following: Tokyo representing Asian cities. large cities cannot depend only on motor • The correlation between railways and vehicles for transportation. With worries urban growth over global environmental issues, public • The location of terminals for intercity London transportation systems are increasingly and intra-city transport seen as an important way to expand and • Examination of various public transit Located in southeast England near the revitalize large cities, while consuming systems, including non-infrastructure mouth of the River Thames, London less energy and other resources. • Strategic planning of rail networks expanded during the Industrial Revolution This article looks at public transportation based on urban development trends (1760–1850) and secured its dominance systems in some major cities of the world and future models as the heart of the British Empire during and identifies similarities and differences The cities selected for this comparative the Victorian era (1837–1901). It’s in areas such as history of development, study are: London as the first city to adapt population grew from about 500,000 in railway networks, and method of rail technology to public transport; Paris, the 17th century to 4.5 million by the end operation. Our aim is to explore the future Berlin and Moscow as three major of the 19th century. The modern relationship between urban and transport European cities; New York as a North- metropolis of Greater London consists of The London Railway Network King’s Cross/St.Pancras Paddington LCY Victoria Waterloo LHR R.
    [Show full text]
  • Techno-Economic Assessment of Battery Electric Trains and Recharging Infrastructure Alternatives Integrating Adjacent Renewable Energy Sources
    sustainability Article Techno-Economic Assessment of Battery Electric Trains and Recharging Infrastructure Alternatives Integrating Adjacent Renewable Energy Sources Christoph Streuling 1,* , Johannes Pagenkopf 1, Moritz Schenker 1 and Kim Lakeit 2 1 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Vehicle Concepts, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; [email protected] (J.P.); [email protected] (M.S.) 2 Institute of Electric Power Systems, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Battery electric multiple units (BEMU) are an effective path towards a decarbonized regional rail transport on partly electrified rail lines. As a means of sector coupling, the BEMU recharging energy demand provided through overhead line islands can be covered from decentralized renewable energy sources (RES). Thus, fully carbon-free electricity for rail transport purposes can be obtained. In this study, we analyze cost reduction potentials of efficient recharging infrastructure positioning and the feasibility of covering BEMU energy demand by direct-use of locally produced renewable electricity. Therefore, we set up a model-based approach which assesses relevant lifecycle costs (LCC) of different trackside electrification alternatives comparing energy supply from local RES and grid consumption. The model-based approach is applied to the example of a German regional rail line. In Citation: Streuling, C.; Pagenkopf, J.; the case of an overhead line island, the direct-use of electricity from adjacent wind power plants with Schenker, M.; Lakeit, K. on-site battery storage results in relevant LCC of EUR 173.4 M/30a, while grid consumption results in Techno-Economic Assessment of EUR 176.2 M/30a whereas full electrification results in EUR 224.5 M/30a.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Car Sharing and End of Life Vehicles
    Ref. Ares(2018)4965112 - 27/09/2018 Research and Innovation action H2020-MG-2016-2017 Review of the Impacts on the Automotive Industry Deliverable D3.3 Version n° 1 Authors: Peter Wells (CU), Haokun Liu (CU), Stefano Beccaria (GM) www.stars-h2020.eu This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 programme under the grant agreement n°769513 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario DISCLAIMER The content of this deliverable reflect only the author’s view. The European Commission and INEA are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. GA n°769513 Page 2 of 61 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario Document Information Grant Agreement 769513 Project Title Shared mobility opporTunities And challenges foR European citieS Project Acronym STARS Project Start Date 01 October 2017 Related work package WP 3 – Business model innovation to enable car sharing Related task(s) Task 3.3 – Review of the impacts on the automotive industry Lead Organisation CU Submission date 30 September 2018 Dissemination Level Public History Date Submitted by Reviewed by Version (Notes) 31 August Cristian Peter Wells (CU) First preliminary version (full deliverable) 2018 Santibanez (LGI) 8 September Peter Wells (CU) Ben Waller (ICDP) Second full deliverable version 2018 Andrea Chicco 25 September Peter Wells (CU) (POLITO), Marco Formatting adjustments and last revision 2018 Diana (POLITO) 27 September Marco Diana Submission of the final Deliverable 3.3 2018 (POLITO) GA n°769513 Page 3 of 61 The growth of car sharing in a business as usual scenario Table of contents SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin Dr. Friedemann Kunst Senatsverwaltung Für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII
    International Transport Expert Council, Moscow | 29/30 August 2013 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin Dr. Friedemann Kunst Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 1 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Agenda 1. Berlin Today 2. Role of Public Transport 3. The Future of Public Transport: Transport Policy and Strategy 4. From Strategy to Local Transport Planning: The Planning System Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 2 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Berlin Today Berlin – Structural Data Area: 892 km²* Inhabitants: 3,375,000* Number Employed: 1,759,200* Unemployment Rate: 12.3%* Motorisation: 38 km 38 324 cars/1,000 inh.** 45% Carfree Households** * Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg. Stand 2012 Population estimate based on Census 2011 45 km ** SrV 2008 Berlin is the biggest city in Germany by far, and it is both, city and a federal state. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Agenda 1. Berlin Today 2. Role of Public Transport 3. The Future of Public Transport: Transport Policy and Strategy 4. From Strategy to Local Transport Planning: The Planning System Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung | Abteilung VII 4 Development Strategies for Public Transport in Berlin | Role of Public Transport Metropolitan Mobility Modal Split PT Walking 26,5% 28,6% Car Cycling 32,3% 12,6% 1/4 of daily trips by public transport 2/3 of daily trips by „environmental alliance“ (PT, Bike,
    [Show full text]
  • On the Potential for One-Way Electric Vehicle Car-Sharing in Future Mobility Systems T ⁎ Richard Mounce , John D
    Transportation Research Part A 120 (2019) 17–30 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems T ⁎ Richard Mounce , John D. Nelson Centre for Transport Research, School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Fraser Noble Building, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: City transport systems often struggle to cope with high volumes of traffic and become congested, Car-sharing despite the use of various traffic management strategies. The concentration of traffic around city Electric vehicle centres results in pollution and poor urban air quality, although the increasing popularity of Charging electric vehicles is helping ameliorate these effects. One reason for the growing momentum Redistribution behind electric vehicles is the emergence of mobility operators such as car-sharing companies, Autonomous vehicle who target users wishing to rent out vehicles on a short-term basis. There is currently rapid growth in one-way car-sharing, in which the vehicle can be dropped off at a different location to the pickup point. Crucially, one-way car-sharing gives the opportunity for travellers to utilise car- sharing in conjunction with other modes, such as public transport modes, for their journey provided the requisite intermodal connections are present. This paper looks at how one-way electric vehicle car-sharing systems have the potential to become important components of future city transport systems. The future role of shared autonomous vehicles is also considered. 1. Introduction Towns and cities are very significant to transport, with larger cities being of greater significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Information Arrival a Arrival B
    Travel Information Arrival A Participants, who opted for the New Year’s trip to Berlin, are expected to arrive in Berlin, December 29, 2011. Most international flights to Berlin arrive at Berlin-Tegel. (If you arrive at Berlin- Schönefeld, please contact the IWU team beforehand) The IWU team will await all participants at the airport meeting point, next to the airport information in the main hall connected to Terminal A. Here you will get your ticket for public transport in Berlin and the location of our hostel. Someone from the IWU team will be waiting for you at the hostel and help you to check in and store your luggage. from BERLIN to KASSEL, January 1, 2011 There will be a bus from the hostel in Berlin to Kassel on January 1. In Kassel, your host families will welcome you and take you to your “new” home. Arrival B Participants, who do not participate in the Berlin trip, are expected to arrive in Kassel, January 1, 2012. The international airport closest to Kassel is Frankfurt (Main). (If you arrive at another airport, please contact the IWU team beforehand and we will provide you with further travel information) Since the IWU team will be on the way back from Berlin, we cannot, unfortunately, pick you up from the airport. But as you will see it is very easy to find your way to Kassel and only a 2-hour train ride away. from FRANKFURT to KASSEL: ⇒ Step 1: Arrival at Frankfurt (Main) Airport: If you arrive at Terminal 1 of the Frankfurt Airport: 1) Follow the signs to the Baggage claim to pick up your luggage 2) Follow the signs to the Regional Train Station (Regionalbahnhof) or Long Distance Train Station (Fernbahnhof) 3) At the ReiseZentrum (Railway Travel Center) buy a ticket to Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (more specific information below) 4) Take a.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin There, Done That...’ a Brief History of Berlin
    a guide for young travellers guten tag! Tom Thrower | Senior Writer This guide is aimed at you. Yes, you, the person reading this guide right now. You want to know about Berlin, the best museums and sights to see? The best places to get a bite to eat, and sample some of Germany’s fine beer? The places to indulge in a spot of retail therapy, and the get a good nights sleep? Well you have come to the right place, as ‘Berlin There, Done That...’ a brief history of berlin... is tailor made to giving you all the Tom Thrower | Senior Writer best advice. Meaning you can make the most of your stay in Germany’s Berlin is a city with a deep and as The Great Elector (1640-1688), capital city. intriguing history. Founded jointly who turned the town’s fortunes how to use this guide with Cölln in 1237, the two were around. He replenished the town’s trading posts and were merged into population, inviting all the oppressed The district each attraction is located one town in 1307. Berlin’s fascination religious minorities of Europe to in has been indicated using one of the with bears started in 1280 with its live in Berlin – especially the French coloured dots listed below: town seal. It increased in size and Huguenots. This, and the town’s Mitte Neukolln importance over the centuries, in economic growth, brought the Kreuzberg Prentzlauer Berg 1400 around 8,500 lived there and in town’s population to 22,000. He Tiergarten Friedrichshain 1500 it was 12,000 – it was prospering.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Report Berlin
    FINAL EVALUATION REPORT BERLIN Authors: Name Partner Institution Elisabeth Kracker Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Hans-Joachim Becker Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Diana Runge Integrated Transport Planning TU Berlin Astrid Karl Social Science Research Centre Berlin (WZB) Wiebke Zimmer Öko-Institut e.V. Martin Schmied Öko-Institut e.V. Martin Schönberg Centre for Technology and Society (CTS) TU Berlin Peer review: Friedemann Kunst Senate Department of Urban Development Issued in November 2005 Table of Contents Table of Contents A INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 A.1 General Remarks .....................................................................................................1 A.2 TELLUS landscape in Berlin.....................................................................................2 1 Demonstration measures...........................................................................................2 2 Thematic clusters.......................................................................................................3 3 Integration into local transport policy .........................................................................4 4 Actors of evaluation ...................................................................................................5 B EVALUATION ON DEMONSTRATION MEASURE LEVEL..............7 B.1 Approach ..................................................................................................................7 1
    [Show full text]
  • Bucharest & Berlin
    Bugheanu A-M. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN EUROPEAN CAPITALS: BUCHAREST & BERLIN COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN EUROPEAN CAPITALS: BUCHAREST & BERLIN Alexandru-Mihai BUGHEANU Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana 6, Bucharest, Romania [email protected] 8 Abstract The present study examines the public transport networks in two European capitals, specifically Bucharest and 201 Berlin. The public transport systems of interest in this research displays similar characteristics regarding the number of users, transport vehicles, geographic area served or provided services. The main objective of the paper is to perform a comparative evaluation on the two transport systems, including May here specific features, transportation performances and costs, travellers perceptions towards the public transport / operators and so on. 2 The purpose of the research was to identify two European capitals, which presents similarities in terms of their public transport systems. For this reason, Berlin and Bucharest metropolis were selected. The results of the analysis can be used to perform a more thorough comparative research on public transport systems across the European Union, or in direct comparison with other metropolitan areas. Issue Issue Keywords: public transport, comparative analysis, Bucharest, Berlin. 3 1 1. INTRODUCTION The present research will analyze the topic of public urban transport in the European Union, the study Volume Volume focusing on the comparative assessment of the metropolitan areas of Berlin and Bucharest. Public passenger transport systems are an area of significant importance in any capital, considering allowing fast and continuous movement for a major part of the population, providing at the same time low-fees services to an extended geographical area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid and Electric Vehicles the ELECTRIC DRIVE GAINS TRACTION
    Hybrid and Electric Vehicles THE ELECTRIC DRIVE GAINS TRACTION May 2013 www.ieahev.org International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes Hybrid and Electric Vehicles The Electric Drive Gains Traction May 2013 www.ieahev.org IA-HEV, also known as the Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IA-HEV do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of all its individual member countries. Cover Photo: The Tesla Model S electric vehicle (EV) began retail deliveries in the U.S. in mid-2012. It ranked as the top-selling plug-in electric car in North America curing the first quarter of 2013 with 4,900 cars sold. (Photo courtesy of Tesla Motors.) The Electric Drive Gains Traction. Cover designer: Kizita Awuakye, New West Technologies, LLC ii www.ieahev.org International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes Annual report of the Executive Committee and Task 1 over the year 2012 Hybrid and Electric Vehicles The Electric Drive Gains Traction Concept and editing: Kristin Abkemeier (Operating Agent Task 1, New West Technologies) Co-editing: Alison Mize (New West Technologies) and the ANL editorial team Design and layout: Kizita Awuakye, New West Technologies Contributing authors: Kristin Abkemeier New West Technologies, LLC United States Markku Antikainen Tekes Finland James Barnes DOE United States David Beeton Urban Foresight United Kingdom Graham Brennan SEAI Ireland Carol Burelle NRCan Canada Mario Conte ENEA Italy Michael Dwyer Energetics, Inc.
    [Show full text]