DOCSLIB.ORG

Davidson Creek Vertebrate Consolidated Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Davidson Creek Vertebrate Consolidated Report Consolidated Report on Vertebrate Fauna Surveys Conducted for the FerrAus Pilbara Project Prepared for FerrAus Ltd Final Report, Rev 0 August 2011 Consolidated Report on Vertebrate Fauna Surveys Conducted for the FerrAus Pilbara Project Final Report FerrAus Ltd Consolidated Report on Vertebrate Fauna Surveys Conducted for the FerrAus Pilbara Project Prepared for FerrAus Limited Final Report, Rev 0 Authors: Karen Crews, Tamara Kabat, Guillaume Bouteloup Reviewer: Jarrad Clark Date: August 2011 Submitted to: Barbara Heemink, Neil Dixon ©Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2011. The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or FerrAus Limited. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Consolidated Report on Vertebrate Fauna Surveys Conducted for the FerrAus Pilbara Project Final Report FerrAus Ltd CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. vi 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Surveys conducted .................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Scope of work and survey objectives ........................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Scope of this report ........................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Scope and survey objectives for technical reports ............................................................ 6 2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia (IBRA) Region .......................................... 9 2.2 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Relevant legislation and agreements for the protection of fauna in Western Australia ....... 10 3 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Desktop reviews and database searches ................................................................................ 12 3.2 Field surveys............................................................................................................................ 12 3.2.1 Trapping for ground-dwelling mammals, reptiles and amphibians ................................ 13 3.2.2 Avifauna surveys .............................................................................................................. 13 3.2.3 Bats .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2.4 Spotlighting ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.5 Active Searches ................................................................................................................ 13 3.3 Taxonomy and nomenclature ................................................................................................. 17 3.4 Survey limitations ................................................................................................................... 17 4 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Species of conservation significance ...................................................................................... 18 4.1.1 Apus pacificus (Fork-tailed Swift) .................................................................................... 19 4.1.2 Falco hypoleucos (Grey Falcon) ....................................................................................... 20 4.1.3 Falco peregrinus (Peregrine Falcon) ................................................................................ 20 4.1.4 Ardeotis australis (Australian Bustard) ............................................................................ 22 4.1.5 Burhinus grallarius (Bush Stone-curlew) ......................................................................... 22 4.1.6 Charadrius veredus (Oriental Plover) .............................................................................. 25 4.1.7 Merops ornatus (Rainbow Bee-eater) ............................................................................. 25 4.1.8 Neochmia ruficauda subclarescens (Star Finch) .............................................................. 25 4.1.9 Dasycercus cristicauda (Crest-tailed Mulgara) and Dasycercus blythi (Brush-tailed Mulgara) ......................................................................................................................................... 27 4.1.10 Macrotis lagotis (Greater Bilby) ....................................................................................... 30 4.1.11 Notoryctes caurinus (Northern Marsupial Mole) ............................................................ 32 4.1.12 Macroderma gigas (Ghost Bat) ........................................................................................ 32 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Consolidated Report on Vertebrate Fauna Surveys Conducted for the FerrAus Pilbara Project Final Report FerrAus Ltd 4.1.13 Pseudomys chapmani (Western Pebble-mound Mouse) ................................................ 34 4.1.14 Lerista macropisthopus remota (Unpatterned Robust Lerista) ...................................... 34 4.1.15 Ctenotus uber johnstonei ................................................................................................ 34 4.2 Fauna habitats of the study area ............................................................................................ 35 4.2.1 Spinifex sandplain ............................................................................................................ 35 4.2.2 Mulga woodland .............................................................................................................. 35 4.2.3 Major creeklines and floodplains .................................................................................... 36 4.2.4 Low rocky ranges and rocky slopes ................................................................................. 36 4.2.5 Sand dunes ...................................................................................................................... 36 4.3 Vertebrate fauna assemblage of the study area .................................................................... 37 4.3.1 Amphibians ...................................................................................................................... 37 4.3.2 Birds ................................................................................................................................. 38 4.3.3 Mammals ......................................................................................................................... 44 4.3.4 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................ 47 5 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS .......................................................................................... 52 5.1 Assessment approach ............................................................................................................. 52 5.1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 52 5.1.2 Method ............................................................................................................................ 52 5.1.3 Scope and limitations ...................................................................................................... 52 5.2 Fauna values ........................................................................................................................... 52 5.2.1 Conservation significant fauna and habitats ................................................................... 52 5.2.2 Fauna assemblages .......................................................................................................... 53 5.3 Threatening processes ............................................................................................................ 53 5.3.1 Habitat loss (population scale) ........................................................................................ 53 5.3.2 Habitat fragmentation ..................................................................................................... 53 5.3.3 Habitat degradation......................................................................................................... 53 5.3.4 Species’ interactions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects
    Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd FINAL REPORT 26 July 2010 Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Final Report Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd by Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd Authors: Greg Harewood, Karen Crews Reviewer: Melanie White, Stewart Ford Date: 26 July 2010 Submitted to: Michelle Carey © Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2010. The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or Australian Premium Iron Management. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6914 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 925-AP-API-FAU Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)
    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Headed Snake (Hoplocephalus Bungaroides)', Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales (1946-7), Pp
    Husbandry Guidelines Broad-Headed Snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides Compiler – Charles Morris Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Captive Animals Certificate III RUV3020R Lecturers: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld & Brad Walker 2009 1 Occupational Health and Safety WARNING This Snake is DANGEROUSLY VENOMOUS CAPABLE OF INFLICTING A POTENTIALLY FATAL BITE ALWAYS HAVE A COMPRESSION BANDAGE WITHIN REACH SNAKE BITE TREATMENT: Do NOT wash the wound. Do NOT cut the wound, apply substances to the wound or use a tourniquet. Do NOT remove jeans or shirt as any movement will assist the venom to enter the blood stream. KEEP THE VICTIM STILL. 1. Apply a broad pressure bandage over the bite site as soon as possible. 2. Keep the limb still. The bandage should be as tight as you would bind a sprained ankle. 3. Extend the bandage down to the fingers or toes then up the leg as high as possible. (For a bite on the hand or forearm bind up to the elbow). 4. Apply a splint if possible, to immobilise the limb. 5. Bind it firmly to as much of the limb as possible. (Use a sling for an arm injury). Bring transport to the victim where possible or carry them to transportation. Transport the victim to the nearest hospital. Please Print this page off and put it up on the wall in your snake room. 2 There is some serious occupational health risks involved in keeping venomous snakes. All risk can be eliminated if kept clean and in the correct lockable enclosures with only the risk of handling left in play.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Terrestrial Small Mammal and Lizard Communities in the Dune System Of
    Management of the terrestrial small mammal and lizard communities in the dune system of Sturt National Park, Australia: Historic and contemporary effects of pastoralism and fox predation Ulrike Sabine Klöcker (Dipl. – Biol., Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Germany) Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2009 Abstract This thesis addressed three issues related to the management and conservation of small terrestrial vertebrates in the arid zone. The study site was an amalgamation of pastoral properties forming the now protected area of Sturt National Park in far-western New South Wales, Australia. Thus firstly, it assessed recovery from disturbance accrued through more than a century of Sheep grazing. Vegetation parameters, Fox, Cat and Rabbit abundance, and the small vertebrate communities were compared, with distance to watering points used as a surrogate for grazing intensity. Secondly, the impacts of small-scale but intensive combined Fox and Rabbit control on small vertebrates were investigated. Thirdly, the ecology of the rare Dusky Hopping Mouse (Notomys fuscus) was used as an exemplar to illustrate and discuss some of the complexities related to the conservation of small terrestrial vertebrates, with a particular focus on desert rodents. Thirty-five years after the removal of livestock and the closure of watering points, areas that were historically heavily disturbed are now nearly indistinguishable from nearby relatively undisturbed areas, despite uncontrolled native herbivore (kangaroo) abundance. Rainfall patterns, rather than grazing history, were responsible for the observed variation between individual sites and may overlay potential residual grazing effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, Volume 60, Number 1, Pp
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 60, number 1, pp. 190–201 doi:10.1093/icb/icaa015 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM Convergent Evolution of Elongate Forms in Craniates and of Locomotion in Elongate Squamate Reptiles Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icb/article-abstract/60/1/190/5813730 by Clark University user on 24 July 2020 Philip J. Bergmann ,* Sara D. W. Mann,* Gen Morinaga,1,*,† Elyse S. Freitas‡ and Cameron D. Siler‡ *Department of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA; †Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA; ‡Department of Biology and Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA From the symposium “Long Limbless Locomotors: The Mechanics and Biology of Elongate, Limbless Vertebrate Locomotion” presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology January 3–7, 2020 at Austin, Texas. 1E-mail: [email protected] Synopsis Elongate, snake- or eel-like, body forms have evolved convergently many times in most major lineages of vertebrates. Despite studies of various clades with elongate species, we still lack an understanding of their evolutionary dynamics and distribution on the vertebrate tree of life. We also do not know whether this convergence in body form coincides with convergence at other biological levels. Here, we present the first craniate-wide analysis of how many times elongate body forms have evolved, as well as rates of its evolution and reversion to a non-elongate form. We then focus on five convergently elongate squamate species and test if they converged in vertebral number and shape, as well as their locomotor performance and kinematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Vertebrate Communities Across the Australian
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1059–1070 ORIGINAL Phylogenetic structure of vertebrate ARTICLE communities across the Australian arid zone Hayley C. Lanier*, Danielle L. Edwards and L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ABSTRACT Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Aim To understand the relative importance of ecological and historical factors Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA in structuring terrestrial vertebrate assemblages across the Australian arid zone, and to contrast patterns of community phylogenetic structure at a continental scale. Location Australia. Methods We present evidence from six lineages of terrestrial vertebrates (five lizard clades and one clade of marsupial mice) that have diversified in arid and semi-arid Australia across 37 biogeographical regions. Measures of within-line- age community phylogenetic structure and species turnover were computed to examine how patterns differ across the continent and between taxonomic groups. These results were examined in relation to climatic and historical fac- tors, which are thought to play a role in community phylogenetic structure. Analyses using a novel sliding-window approach confirm the generality of pro- cesses structuring the assemblages of the Australian arid zone at different spa- tial scales. Results Phylogenetic structure differed greatly across taxonomic groups. Although these lineages have radiated within the same biome – the Australian arid zone – they exhibit markedly different community structure at the regio- nal and local levels. Neither current climatic factors nor historical habitat sta- bility resulted in a uniform response across communities. Rather, historical and biogeographical aspects of community composition (i.e. local lineage per- sistence and diversification histories) appeared to be more important in explaining the variation in phylogenetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles
    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 Fauna Survey.Pdf
    Fauna Survey (Level 2) Phase 1 (September 2016) and Phase 2 (April 2017) Lake Wells Potash Project Australian Potash Ltd September 2017 Report Number: 01-000017-1/2 VERSION 4 On behalf of: Australian Potash Limited PO Box 1941 WEST PERTH, WA 6872 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected] LAKE WELLS POTASH PROJECT – AUSTRALIAN POTASH LTD – L2 FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – SEPTEMBER 2017 – V4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. III 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 SURVEY AREA ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 SURVEY SCOPE .............................................................................................. 1 2. METHODS ........................................................................................................ 3 2.1 FAUNA INVENTORY - LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................... 3 2.1.1 Database Searches .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ........................................................................................ 3 2.2 FAUNA INVENTORY – DETAILED
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report of Professor Woinarski
    NOTICE OF FILING This document was lodged electronically in the FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FCA) on 18/01/2019 3:23:32 PM AEDT and has been accepted for filing under the Court’s Rules. Details of filing follow and important additional information about these are set out below. Details of Filing Document Lodged: Expert Report File Number: VID1228/2017 File Title: FRIENDS OF LEADBEATER'S POSSUM INC v VICFORESTS Registry: VICTORIA REGISTRY - FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Dated: 18/01/2019 3:23:39 PM AEDT Registrar Important Information As required by the Court’s Rules, this Notice has been inserted as the first page of the document which has been accepted for electronic filing. It is now taken to be part of that document for the purposes of the proceeding in the Court and contains important information for all parties to that proceeding. It must be included in the document served on each of those parties. The date and time of lodgment also shown above are the date and time that the document was received by the Court. Under the Court’s Rules the date of filing of the document is the day it was lodged (if that is a business day for the Registry which accepts it and the document was received by 4.30 pm local time at that Registry) or otherwise the next working day for that Registry. No. VID 1228 of 2017 Federal Court of Australia District Registry: Victoria Division: ACLHR FRIENDS OF LEADBEATER’S POSSUM INC Applicant VICFORESTS Respondent EXPERT REPORT OF PROFESSOR JOHN CASIMIR ZICHY WOINARSKI Contents: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Assessment of Aprasia Fusca and A
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 28 144–163 (2013) Morphological and molecular assessment of Aprasia fusca and A. rostrata (Squamata: Pygopodidae), with a description of a new species from the Lake MacLeod region, Western Australia Brad Maryan¹,4, Brian G. Bush² and Mark Adams³ ¹ Biologic Environmental Survey, 50B Angove Street, North Perth, Western Australia 6006, Australia. Email: [email protected] ² Snakes Harmful and Harmless, 9 Birch Place, Stoneville, Western Australia 6554, Australia. ³ Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. 4 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia. ABSTRACT – The Australian pygopodid genus Aprasia comprises a group of small, morphologically conservative, worm-like fossorial lizards, many of which are distributed along the west coast of the continent. This study re-examines the taxonomic distinctiveness of the two most northerly occurring species in Western Australia: A. fusca and A. rostrata, which are very similar in morphology. A combined morphological and allozyme analysis revealed these two species to be conspecifi c with A. rostrata considered a senior synonym of A. fusca. As a consequence, we have redescribed A. rostrata. The allozyme analysis also revealed a new species, named here as Aprasia litorea sp. nov. This species occurs in the Lake Macleod region, well to the south of its congener, A. rostrata, and the two species are diagnosable using a conservative suite of morphological and meristic characters. KEYWORDS: worm lizard, synonymy, Aprasia litorea sp. nov., North West Cape, Montebello Islands, Barrow Island, allozyme electrophoresis INTRODUCTION the fi rst British atomic weapons (Hill 1955).
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]