DOCSLIB.ORG

Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016) GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance .............................................................6 4.1.5 Likelihood of Occurrence – Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance7 4.1.6 Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................8 4.2 INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ........................ 8 4.3 SITE SURVEYS.......................................................................................................9 4.3.1 Habitat Assessment ......................................................................................9 4.3.2 Opportunistic Fauna Observations .............................................................10 5. SURVEY CONSTRAINTS.....................................................................................10 6. RESULTS ..............................................................................................................11 6.1 POTENTIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY.............................................. 11 6.2 INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ...................... 11 6.3 SITE SURVEYS.....................................................................................................13 6.3.1 Habitat Assessment ....................................................................................13 6.3.2 Opportunistic Fauna Observations .............................................................15 6.4 FAUNA INVENTORY – SUMMARY......................................................................16 GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 6.4.1 Vertebrate Fauna.........................................................................................16 6.4.2 Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance ......................................... 17 7. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................22 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................................................................24 TABLES TABLE 1: Main Terrestrial Fauna Habitats within the Survey Area. TABLE 2: Summary of Potential Vertebrate Fauna Species TABLE 3: Likelihood of Occurrence – Vertebrate Fauna Species of Conservation Significance FIGURES FIGURE 1: Survey Areas & Surrounds FIGURE 2: Yeo Borefield Area - Air Photo FIGURE 3: Anne Beadell Borefield Area - Air Photo FIGURE 4: Vegetation Communities (Botanica 2015) APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Conservation Categories APPENDIX B: Vertebrate Fauna Recorded or Potentially in Region of Survey Area APPENDIX C: DPaW NatureMap & EPBC Act Database Search Results APPENDIX D: Significant Species Profiles GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 Acronyms/Abbreviations: BA: Birdlife Australia (Formerly RAOU, Birds Australia). BC Bill: Biodiversity Conservation Bill (2015). WA Government. CALM: Department of Conservation and Land Management (now DPaW), WA Government. CAMBA: China Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1998. DEC: Department of Environment and Conservation (now DPaW), WA Government. DEH: Department of Environment and Heritage (now DoE), Australian Government. DEP: Department of Environment Protection (now DER), WA Government. DEWHA: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (now DoE), Australian Government. DER: Department of Environment Regulation (formerly DEC, DoE), WA Government. DMP: Department of Mines and Petroleum (formerly DoIR), WA Government. DoE: Department of Environment (now DER/DPaW), WA Government. DoIR: Department of Industry and Resources (now DMP), WA Government. DotE: Department of the Environment (formerly SEWPaC, DWEHA, DEH), Australian Government. DPaW: Department of Parks and Wildlife (formerly DEC, CALM, DoE), WA Government. EP Act: Environmental Protection Act 1986,WA Government. EPA: Environmental Protection Authority, WA Government. EPBC Act: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Australian Government. ha: Hectare (10,000 square metres). IBRA: Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia. IUCN: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources – commonly known as the World Conservation Union. JAMBA: Japan Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1981. km: Kilometre (1,000 metres). Page i GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 OEPA: Office Environmental Protection Authority, WA Government. RAOU: Royal Australia Ornithologist Union. ROKAMBA: Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 2007. SEWPaC: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (now DotE, formerly DEH, DEWHA), Australian Government. SRE: Short Range Endemic. SSC: Species Survival Commission, International. WA: Western Australia. WAM: Western Australian Museum, WA Government. WC Act: Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, WA Government. Page ii GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 SUMMARY This report details the results of a Level 1 fauna assessment of the proposed Gruyere borefields project area being investigated as part of Gold Road Resources Limited’s (GRRs) possible future gold project development in the “Yamarna Belt” tenement areas situated about 160km north-east of Laverton, Western Australia (Figure 1). The borefield (and associated pipeline routes) are comprised of two main areas, one to the west of the main Gruyere Project area (Yeo Borefield) and one to the south east (Anne Beadell Borefield)(Figures 2 & 3). The area surveyed as part of this assessment covers approximately 5,983 ha. The assessment was undertaken for the purposes of delineating and characterising the fauna habitats and faunal assemblages present in the target area. The assessment has included a desktop review and field reconnaissance survey (8 to 10 November 2015) carried out to comply with relevant EPA guidance statements. Previous terrestrial invertebrate surveys undertaken within the Yamarna area indicate that it is possible that potential SREs could occur within the proposed borefield areas, given the proximity of the records acquired to date and the presence of similar habitat types. A list of expected vertebrate fauna species likely to occur in the survey area was compiled from information obtained during the literature review and is presented in Appendix B. Observations made during the field survey and the results of some previous fauna surveys carried out in the general area are summarised in this species listing as are the DPaW NatureMap database search results. With respect to native vertebrate fauna, 28 mammals (including eight bat species), 103 bird, 105 reptile and nine frog species have previously been recorded in the general area, some of which have the potential to occur in or utilise at times, the survey area. The broad scale terrestrial fauna habitats within the survey area presented below are based primarily on landforms identified by Botanica (2015) with further often subtle subdivisions possible using vegetation structure. The extent of the identified broad scale fauna habitats within the survey area are shown in Figure 4 with a summary description of each given below. x Clay-Loam Plains Acacia Forests and Woodlands, Acacia Shrublands, Mallee Open Woodlands and Sparse Mallee Shrublands Total Area = 172 ha (~2.9%. x Closed Depressions Acacia Forests and Woodlands, Casuarina Forests and Woodlands, Mallee Woodlands and Shrublands, Chenopod Shrublands, Samphire Shrublands and Forblands. Total Area = 266 ha (~4.4%) Page iii GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 x Drainage Depressions Acacia Forests and Woodlands, Acacia Open Woodlands, Mallee Woodlands and Shrublands. Total Area = 163 ha (~2.7%) x Quartz/Rocky Plains Acacia Forests and Woodlands, Casuarina Forests and Woodlands, Mallee Woodlands and Shrublands. Total Area = 335 ha (~5.6%) x Sand Dunes Eucalypt
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation
    vol. 195, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2020 E-Article Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution of an Innovation Terry J. Ord,1,* Joan Garcia-Porta,1,† Marina Querejeta,2,‡ and David C. Collar3 1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia; 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37–49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; 3. Department of Organismal and Environmental Biology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606 Submitted August 1, 2018; Accepted July 16, 2019; Electronically published December 17, 2019 Online enhancements: supplemental material. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t7g227h. fi abstract: Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are eral de nitions of what represents an innovation have been factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many offered (reviewed by Rabosky 2017), this classical descrip- innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on tion arguably remains the most useful (Galis 2001; Stroud morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species and Losos 2016; Rabosky 2017). Hypothesized innovations can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympat- have drawn considerable attention among ecologists and ric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the in- evolutionary biologists because they can expand the range novation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) of ecological niches occupied within communities. In do- and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing ing so, innovations are thought to be important engines of selection on body size (dragons).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Mandibular Gland of the Ant Paraponera Clavata (Hymenoptera: Paraponerinae)
    Received: 9 October 2018 Revised: 17 January 2019 Accepted: 2 February 2019 DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23242 RESEARCH ARTICLE Morphology of the mandibular gland of the ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Paraponerinae) Thito Thomston Andrade1 | Wagner Gonzaga Gonçalves2 | José Eduardo Serrão2 | Luiza Carla Barbosa Martins1 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade, Ambiente e Saúde, Abstract Departamento de Biologia e Química, The ant Paraponera clavata (Fabricius, 1775) is the only extant species of Paraponerinae and is Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Caxias, widely distributed in Brazilian forests. Aspects of its biology are documented extensively in the Maranhão, Brazil literature; however, knowledge of P. clavata internal morphology, specifically of exocrine glands, 2Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, is restricted to the venom apparatus. The objective of this study was to describe the mandibular Minas Gerais, Brazil gland morphology of P. clavata workers. The mandibular gland is composed of a reservoir con- nected to a cluster of Type III secretory cells with cytoplasm rich in mitochondria and lipid drop- Correspondence lets, similar to that of other ants. Notably, the glandular secretion is rich in protein and has a Luiza Carla Barbosa Martins, Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biodiversidade, Ambiente e solid aspect. This is the first morphological description of the mandibular gland of P. clavata. Saúde, Departamento de Biologia e Química, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Caxias, Research Highlights Maranhão, Brazil. This study presents the morphological description of the mandibular gland of Paraponera clavata Email: [email protected] (Hymenoptera: Paraponerinae). Singular characteristics of the gland are described: the glandular Review Editor: George Perry secretion is rich in protein and has a solid aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Terrestrial Small Mammal and Lizard Communities in the Dune System Of
    Management of the terrestrial small mammal and lizard communities in the dune system of Sturt National Park, Australia: Historic and contemporary effects of pastoralism and fox predation Ulrike Sabine Klöcker (Dipl. – Biol., Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Germany) Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2009 Abstract This thesis addressed three issues related to the management and conservation of small terrestrial vertebrates in the arid zone. The study site was an amalgamation of pastoral properties forming the now protected area of Sturt National Park in far-western New South Wales, Australia. Thus firstly, it assessed recovery from disturbance accrued through more than a century of Sheep grazing. Vegetation parameters, Fox, Cat and Rabbit abundance, and the small vertebrate communities were compared, with distance to watering points used as a surrogate for grazing intensity. Secondly, the impacts of small-scale but intensive combined Fox and Rabbit control on small vertebrates were investigated. Thirdly, the ecology of the rare Dusky Hopping Mouse (Notomys fuscus) was used as an exemplar to illustrate and discuss some of the complexities related to the conservation of small terrestrial vertebrates, with a particular focus on desert rodents. Thirty-five years after the removal of livestock and the closure of watering points, areas that were historically heavily disturbed are now nearly indistinguishable from nearby relatively undisturbed areas, despite uncontrolled native herbivore (kangaroo) abundance. Rainfall patterns, rather than grazing history, were responsible for the observed variation between individual sites and may overlay potential residual grazing effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA
    B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 Dr. R. JENNI & Dr. R. DHANAPAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY M. R. GOVT. ARTS COLLEGE MANNARGUDI CONTENTS CHORDATA COURSE CODE: 16SCCZO3 Block and Unit title Block I (Primitive chordates) 1 Origin of chordates: Introduction and charterers of chordates. Classification of chordates up to order level. 2 Hemichordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Balanoglossus and its affinities. 3 Urochordata: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Herdmania and its affinities. 4 Cephalochordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Branchiostoma (Amphioxus) and its affinities. 5 Cyclostomata (Agnatha) General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Petromyzon and its affinities. Block II (Lower chordates) 6 Fishes: General characters and classification up to order level. Types of scales and fins of fishes, Scoliodon as type study, migration and parental care in fishes. 7 Amphibians: General characters and classification up to order level, Rana tigrina as type study, parental care, neoteny and paedogenesis. 8 Reptilia: General characters and classification up to order level, extinct reptiles. Uromastix as type study. Identification of poisonous and non-poisonous snakes and biting mechanism of snakes. 9 Aves: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Columba (Pigeon) and Characters of Archaeopteryx. Flight adaptations & bird migration. 10 Mammalia: General characters and classification up
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for the Shingleback Lizard Tiliqua Rugosa
    Husbandry Manual for The Shingleback Lizard Tiliqua rugosa GRAY, 1825 Reptilia:Scincidae Compiler: Andrew Titmuss Date of Preparation: 2007 University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury © Andrew Titmuss 2007 1 A Husbandry Manual template has been developed to standardise information on captive management needs in a concise, accessible and usable form. Currently there is no Husbandry Manual for the Shingleback Lizard. As these lizards are commonly kept in zoological and private collections in Australia and internationally, a Husbandry Manual could be widely used. This Husbandry Manual is set out as per the husbandry manual template designed by Stephen Jackson and Graeme Phipps. The template is a document that was created to maintain husbandry manual uniformity and thus its effectiveness and ease of use. It is intended as a working document. It is designed to be used by any institution, as well as private collections, holding this species. Although these lizards are easy to keep in captivity they do have some special requirements. The aim of the Husbandry Manual is to summarise and consolidate information regarding OHS, natural history, captive management and ethical husbandry techniques and conservation from a variety of sources. It should provide information on appropriate husbandry with scope for improved health and welfare and captive breeding if required. The University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, is planning on keeping Shingleback Lizards amongst other species in their reptile unit. This manual can be used by the University of
    [Show full text]
  • E-Program DO NOT PRINT!
    e-program DO NOT PRINT! You’ll receive a pocket program at registration, so no need to print this one. This e-program includes all presentation sessions and the associated abstracts, which are hyperlinked to the name of the presenter. Plenary abstracts are included in the pocket program. The plan on a page Tuesday June 20 Wednesday June 21 Thursday June 22 Friday June 23 7:30-8:30 am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: Dining Hall Dining Hall Dining Hall 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: Rick Sabrina Fossette-Halot - Renee Catullo - Chapel. Shine - Chapel. Introduced Chapel. Introduced by Nicki Introduced by Scott Keogh by Ben Philips Mitchell 10:00-10:25 am Tea break 10:00-10:15am Tea break 10:00-10:25am Tea break 10:30-11:54am Short 10:20am -12:00pm Mike Bull 10:30-11:42am Short Talks: Talks: Session 1 - Symposium - Chapel Session 8 - Clubhouse: Clubhouse: upstairs and upstairs and downstairs downstairs 11:45 Conference close (upstairs) 12:00-2:00pm Lunch 12:00-1:00pm Conference 12:00-1:00pm Lunch: Dining (Dining Hall) and ASH photo and lunch Hall or Grab and Go, buses AGM (Clubhouse upstairs) depart for airport from midday High ropes course and 1:00-2:00pm Short Talks: climbing wall open. Book at Session 5 - Clubhouse: registration on Tuesday if upstairs and downstairs interested 2:00 -4:00pm 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: Registration, locate Session 2 Clubhouse Session 6 Clubhouse accommodation, light upstairs upstairs fires, load talks, book activities 3:00-3:25pm
    [Show full text]
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles
    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography for Barrow Island Terrestrial Invertebrates
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 83 135–144 (2013) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.83.2013.135-144 SUPPLEMENT Annotated bibliography for Barrow Island terrestrial invertebrates Christopher K. Taylor Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – A bibliography is provided of publications treating terrestrial invertebrates on Barrow Island. A brief overview is also given of natural history and invertebrate collections on Barrow Island. KEYWORDS: Arthropoda, Insecta, Arachnida, Gastropoda, publication history INTRODUCTION During the late 1800s Barrow Island was utilised at various times by pastoralists, guano miners, pearl As part of this special issue on the terrestrial and turtle fishers, and slavers (Hook et al. 2004; invertebrate fauna of Barrow Island in Western ‘Supreme Court—Civil Side’, West Australian, 26 Australia, we take the opportunity to present May 1887; ‘The native question’, Daily News [Perth], a bibliography of previous publications on the 16 February 1905). If any of these individuals subject. A more general bibliography of Barrow were interested in collecting invertebrates, their Island’s natural history was previously collated by endeavours in that field have not been recorded for Smith et al. (2006). The current bibliography differs posterity. from that in gathering not only publications for which Barrow Island was the primary focus, but J.T. Tunney of the Western Australian Museum also those in which Barrow Island specimens were spent six weeks on Barrow Island in 1901 (‘News considered as part of a broader study. and notes’, West Australian, 22 March 1901).
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition) Urn:Lsid:Zoobank.Org:Pub:8EDE33EB-3C43-4DFA-A1F4-5CC86DED76C8
    Zootaxa 3507: 38–56 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8EDE33EB-3C43-4DFA-A1F4-5CC86DED76C8 Redescription and generic placement of the spider Cryptachaea gigantipes (Keyserling, 1890) (Araneae: Theridiidae) and notes on related synanthropic species in Australasia HELEN M. SMITH1,5, COR J. VINK2,3, BRIAN M. FITZGERALD4 & PHIL J. SIRVID4 1 Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Biosecurity & Biocontrol, AgResearch, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Entomology Research Museum, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. 4 Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 5 Corresponding author Abstract Cryptachaea gigantipes (Keyserling, 1890) n. comb. is redescribed from fresh material, the female is described for the first time and notes on biology are given. Cryptachaea gigantipes has been recorded from natural habitats in south-eastern Australia, but is also commonly encountered around houses and other built structures, there and in the North Island of New Zealand. The earliest New Zealand records are from the year 2000 and it would appear that the species has been accidentally introduced due to its synanthropic tendencies. The idea of a recent and limited initial introduction is supported by cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) sequences, which are extremely homogeneous from New Zealand specimens compared to those from Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]