DOCSLIB.ORG

1049 Wonmunna Verebrate Fauna Report 2014 Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1049 Wonmunna Verebrate Fauna Report 2014 Update Level 2 vertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Final report - July 2014 Level 2 vertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Level 2 vertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd. Final report Authors: Guillaume Bouteloup, Jarrad Clark, Ryan Ellis Reviewers: Melanie White, Karen Crews Date: 23 July 2014 Submitted to: Gay Bradley and Ray Gerrard (Piacentini & Son) Chain of authorship and review Name Task Version Date R. Ellis Rev 1 to client 1.0 30/01/2012 G. Bouteloup 2014 update for editorial review 1.1 22/07/2014 K. Crews Final submitted to client 2.0 24/07/2014 ©Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2014 The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this report may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences of the Client. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Rd BALCATTA WA 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 1049-WON-AR-FAU Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Level 2 vertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ VI 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of work and survey objectives .............................................................................. 1 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Commonwealth ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 State ................................................................................................................................ 6 3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................... 7 3.1 Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia (IBRA) region ................................. 7 3.2 Land systems ................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Climate and weather ..................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Land use ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Biological context .......................................................................................................... 12 3.5.1 Vertebrate fauna ........................................................................................................... 12 3.5.2 Threatening processes .................................................................................................. 13 4 METHODS .................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Desktop review and database searches ........................................................................ 15 4.2 Habitat assessment and site selection .......................................................................... 16 4.3 Field survey ................................................................................................................... 16 4.3.1 Trapping for ground-dwelling mammals, reptiles and amphibians .............................. 19 4.3.2 Avifauna surveys ........................................................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Bat echolocation recordings ......................................................................................... 20 4.3.4 Spotlighting ................................................................................................................... 20 4.3.5 Motion camera trapping ............................................................................................... 21 4.3.6 Active searches ............................................................................................................. 23 4.3.7 Opportunistic records ................................................................................................... 23 4.3.8 Targeted searching ........................................................................................................ 23 4.3.9 Aquatic vertebrate trapping ......................................................................................... 23 4.3.10 Targeted trapping for Northern Quoll .......................................................................... 23 4.3.11 Additional targeted survey............................................................................................ 24 4.4 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................................... 24 4.5 Taxonomy and nomenclature ....................................................................................... 25 4.6 Survey personnel........................................................................................................... 25 5 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 26 5.1 Desktop review ............................................................................................................. 26 5.2 Field survey ................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 Habitat descriptions ...................................................................................................... 28 5.2.2 Summary of fauna records ............................................................................................ 30 5.2.3 Fish ................................................................................................................................ 32 5.2.4 Amphibians ................................................................................................................... 32 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Level 2 vertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd 5.2.5 Mammals ...................................................................................................................... 32 5.2.6 Reptiles .......................................................................................................................... 34 5.2.7 Birds .............................................................................................................................. 36 5.2.8 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................................... 40 5.3 Survey limitations.......................................................................................................... 42 6 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 44 6.1 Conservation significant species recorded ................................................................... 44 6.1.1 Western Pebble-mound Mouse (Pseudomys chapmani) ............................................. 44 6.1.2 Australian Bustard (Ardeotis australis) ......................................................................... 46 6.1.3 Bush Stone-curlew (Burhinus grallarius) ....................................................................... 46 6.1.4 Star Finch (Neochmia ruficauda subclarescens) ........................................................... 47 6.1.5 Rainbow Bee-eater (Merops ornatus) ........................................................................... 48 6.1.6 Other significant species potentially occurring in the study area ................................ 49 6.2 Important fauna habitats .............................................................................................. 54 6.3 Impacts and recommendations .................................................................................... 55 6.3.1 Habitat loss and fragmentation .................................................................................... 55 6.3.2 Loss of individual fauna and strike mortalities ............................................................. 56 6.3.3 Displacement of individuals .......................................................................................... 56 6.3.4 Hydrological impacts ..................................................................................................... 57 6.3.5 Spread of introduced fauna and flora ........................................................................... 57 6.3.6 Pollution events ............................................................................................................ 57 6.3.7 Light spill ....................................................................................................................... 58 6.3.8 Fire ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects
    Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd FINAL REPORT 26 July 2010 Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Final Report Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd by Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd Authors: Greg Harewood, Karen Crews Reviewer: Melanie White, Stewart Ford Date: 26 July 2010 Submitted to: Michelle Carey © Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2010. The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or Australian Premium Iron Management. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6914 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 925-AP-API-FAU Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna Survey for Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Headed Snake (Hoplocephalus Bungaroides)', Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales (1946-7), Pp
    Husbandry Guidelines Broad-Headed Snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides Compiler – Charles Morris Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Captive Animals Certificate III RUV3020R Lecturers: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld & Brad Walker 2009 1 Occupational Health and Safety WARNING This Snake is DANGEROUSLY VENOMOUS CAPABLE OF INFLICTING A POTENTIALLY FATAL BITE ALWAYS HAVE A COMPRESSION BANDAGE WITHIN REACH SNAKE BITE TREATMENT: Do NOT wash the wound. Do NOT cut the wound, apply substances to the wound or use a tourniquet. Do NOT remove jeans or shirt as any movement will assist the venom to enter the blood stream. KEEP THE VICTIM STILL. 1. Apply a broad pressure bandage over the bite site as soon as possible. 2. Keep the limb still. The bandage should be as tight as you would bind a sprained ankle. 3. Extend the bandage down to the fingers or toes then up the leg as high as possible. (For a bite on the hand or forearm bind up to the elbow). 4. Apply a splint if possible, to immobilise the limb. 5. Bind it firmly to as much of the limb as possible. (Use a sling for an arm injury). Bring transport to the victim where possible or carry them to transportation. Transport the victim to the nearest hospital. Please Print this page off and put it up on the wall in your snake room. 2 There is some serious occupational health risks involved in keeping venomous snakes. All risk can be eliminated if kept clean and in the correct lockable enclosures with only the risk of handling left in play.
    [Show full text]
  • 2236.Full.Pdf
    2236 The Journal of Experimental Biology 215, 2236-2246 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.065516 RESEARCH ARTICLE Flexibility in thermoregulatory physiology of two dunnarts, Sminthopsis macroura and Sminthopsis ooldea (Marsupialia; Dasyuridae) Sean Tomlinson1,*, Philip C. Withers1 and Shane K. Maloney2 1School of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences and 2School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, Faculty of Life and Physical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009 WA, Australia *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) SUMMARY Stripe-faced dunnarts (Sminthopsis macroura) and Ooldea dunnarts (S. ooldea) were acclimated for 2weeks to ambient temperature (Ta) regimes of 12–22°C, 18–28°C and 25–35°C, and then measured for standard, basal (BMR) and maximum (MMR) metabolic rate using flow-through respirometry. Sminthopsis macroura maintained a stable body temperature under all experimental Ta and acclimation regimes. Although its BMR was not statistically different between the three acclimation regimes, the lower end of the thermoneutral zone (TNZ) shifted from 30°C under the 18–28°C and 12–22°C acclimation regimes to 35°C under the 25–35°C acclimation regime. MMR increased significantly at the cooler acclimation regimes. EWL increased at Ta35°C, compared with lower Ta, in all acclimation regimes, but an increase in evaporative water loss (EWL) at Ta10°C observed in cool acclimations did not occur at the 25–35°C regime. In contrast, S. ooldea had variable body temperature between experimental Ta in all acclimation regimes, but no acclimational shift in TNZ, which was between 30 and 35°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • Heterothermy in Pouched Mammals a Review
    bs_bs_bannerJournal of Zoology Journal of Zoology. Print ISSN 0952-8369 MINI-SERIES Heterothermy in pouched mammals – a review A. Riek1,2 & F. Geiser2 1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany 2 Centre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia Keywords Abstract heterothermy; marsupials; phylogeny; torpor; hibernation. Hibernation and daily torpor (i.e. temporal heterothermy) have been reported in many marsupial species of diverse families and are known to occur in ∼15% of all Correspondence marsupials, which is a greater proportion than the percentage of heterothermic Alexander Riek, Department of Animal placentals. Therefore, we aimed to gather data on heterothermy, including Sciences, University of Göttingen, minimal body temperature, torpor metabolic rate and torpor bout duration for Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, marsupials, and relate these physiological variables to phylogeny and other Germany. Tel: +49 551 395610; Fax: +49 physiological traits. Data from published studies on 41 marsupial species were 551 39 available for the present analysis. Heterothermic marsupials ranged from small Email: [email protected] species such as planigales weighing 7 g to larger species such as quolls weighing up to 1000 g. We used the marsupial phylogeny to estimate various heterothermic Editor: Heike Lutermann traits where the current dataset was incomplete. The torpor metabolic rate in relation to basal metabolic rate (%) ranged from 5.2 to 62.8% in daily Received 13 May 2013; revised 31 July heterotherms and from 2.1 to 5.2% in marsupial hibernators, and was significantly 2013; accepted 8 August 2013 correlated with the minimum body temperature in daily heterotherms (R2 = 0.77, P < 0.001), but not in hibernators (R2 = 0.10, P > 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Introgression Via Ancient Hybridization, and Systematics of the Australian Endemic Pygopodid Gecko Genus Delma Q ⇑ Ian G
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94 (2016) 577–590 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Mitochondrial introgression via ancient hybridization, and systematics of the Australian endemic pygopodid gecko genus Delma q ⇑ Ian G. Brennan , Aaron M. Bauer, Todd R. Jackman Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA article info abstract Article history: Of the more than 1500 species of geckos found across six continents, few remain as unfamiliar as the Received 11 May 2015 pygopodids – Family Pygopodidae (Gray, 1845). These gekkotans are limited to Australia (44 species) Revised 21 September 2015 and New Guinea (2 species), but have diverged extensively into the most ecologically diverse limbless Accepted 6 October 2015 radiation save Serpentes. Current phylogenetic understanding of the family has relied almost exclusively Available online 23 October 2015 on two works, which have produced and synthesized an immense amount of morphological, geograph- ical, and molecular data. However, current interspecific relationships within the largest genus Delma Gray Keywords: 1831 are based chiefly upon data from two mitochondrial loci (16s, ND2). Here, we reevaluate the inter- Mitochondrial capture specific relationships within the genus Delma using two mitochondrial and four nuclear loci (RAG1, Introgression Biogeography MXRA5, MOS, DYNLL1), and identify points of strong conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial geno- Pygopodidae mic data. We address mito-nuclear discordance, and remedy this conflict by recognizing several points of Gekkota mitochondrial introgression as the result of ancient hybridization events. Owing to the legacy value and intraspecific informativeness, we suggest the continued use of ND2 as a phylogenetic marker.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • TREES Botanical Common Acacia Aneura Mulga Acacia Berlandieri
    TREES Botanical Common Acacia aneura Mulga Acacia berlandieri Guajillo Acacia craspedocarpa Leatherleaf Acacia Acacia farnesiana Sweet Acacia Acacia rigidula Blackbrush Acacia Acacia salicina Willow Acacia Acacia saligna Blue Leaf Wattle Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco Albizia julibrissin Silk tree, Mimosa Tree Arecastrum romanzoffianum Queen Palm Bauhinia blakeana Hong Kong Orchid Tree Bauhinia lunarioides White Orchid Tree Bauhinia Purpurea Purple Orchid Tree Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm Brahea edulis Guadalupe Island Palm Butia Capitata Pindo Palm Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote Callistemon viminalis Bottle Brush Tree Ceratonia siliqua Carob Tree Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow Chitalpa X tashkentenis Chitalpa Chorisia speciosa Silk floss Tree, Kapok Cupressus arizonica Arizona Cypress Cupressus Sempervirens Italian Cypress Dalbergia sissoo Indian Rosewood Dalea spinosa Desert Smoke Tree Eriobotrya japonica Loquat, Japanese Plum Eucalyptus cinerea Silver-Dollar Tree Eucalyptus krusaena Kruses Eucalyptus Eucalyptus microtheca Coolibah Tree Eucalyptus papuana Ghost Gum Eucalyptus spathulata Swamp Mallee Eysenhardtia orthocarpa Kidneywood Fraxinus uhdei Evergreen Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Lysiloma watsonii var. thornberi Feather Tree Melaleuca quinquenervia Cajeput
    [Show full text]
  • MVG 16 Acacia Shrublands DRAFT
    MVG 16 - ACACIA SHRUBLANDS Acacia hillii, Tanami Desert, NT (Photo: D. Keith) Overview The overstorey of MVG 16 is dominated by multi-stemmed acacia shrubs. The most widespread species is Acacia aneura (mulga). Mulga vegetation takes on a variety of structural expressions and is consequently classified partly within MVG 16 where the overstorey is dominated by multi-stemmed shrubs, partly within MVG 6 in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol definition of forest cover in Australia (trees > 2 m tall and crown cover > 20%, foliage projective cover > 10%); and partly within MVG 13 where the woody dominants are predominantly single-stemmed, but with crown cover less than 20%. Occurs where annual rainfall is below 250mm in southern Australia and below 350mm in northern Australia (Hodgkinson 2002; Foulkes et al. 2014). Species composition varies along rainfall gradients, with substrate and rainfall seasonality (Beadle 1981; Johnson and Burrows 1994). Transitions into MVG 13 Acacia woodlands with higher rainfall and varying soil types. Is most commonly found on red earth soils (Hodgkinson 2002). Facts and figures Major Vegetation Group MVG 16 - Acacia Shrublands Major Vegetation Subgroups 20. Stony mulga woodlands and shrublands NSW, (number of NVIS descriptions) NT, QLD, SA, WA 23. Sandplain Acacia woodlands and shrublands NSW, NT, QLD, SA, WA Typical NVIS structural formations Shrubland (tall, mid,) Open shrubland (tall, mid,) Sparse shrubland (tall, mid,) Number of IBRA regions 53 Most extensive in IBRA region Est. pre-1750 and present : Great Victoria Desert (WA and SA) Estimated pre-1750 extent (km2) 865 845 Present extent (km2) 851 274 Area protected (km2) 85 444 Acacia ligulata (sandhill wattle), SA (Photo: M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lives of Creatures Obscure, Misunderstood, and Wonderful: a Volume in Honour of Ken Aplin 1958–2019
    Papers in Honour of Ken Aplin edited by Julien Louys, Sue O’Connor and Kristofer M. Helgen Helgen, Kristofer M., Julien Louys, and Sue O’Connor. 2020. The lives of creatures obscure, misunderstood, and wonderful: a volume in honour of Ken Aplin 1958–2019 ..........................149 Armstrong, Kyle N., Ken Aplin, and Masaharu Motokawa. 2020. A new species of extinct False Vampire Bat (Megadermatidae: Macroderma) from the Kimberley Region of Western Australia ........................................................................................................... 161 Cramb, Jonathan, Scott A. Hocknull, and Gilbert J. Price. 2020. Fossil Uromys (Rodentia: Murinae) from central Queensland, with a description of a new Middle Pleistocene species ............................................................................................................. 175 Price, Gilbert J., Jonathan Cramb, Julien Louys, Kenny J. Travouillon, Eleanor M. A. Pease, Yue-xing Feng, Jian-xin Zhao, and Douglas Irvin. 2020. Late Quaternary fossil vertebrates of the Broken River karst area, northern Queensland, Australia ........................ 193 Theden-Ringl, Fenja, Geoffrey S. Hope, Kathleen P. Hislop, and Benedict J. Keaney. 2020. Characterizing environmental change and species’ histories from stratified faunal records in southeastern Australia: a regional review and a case study for the early to middle Holocene ........................................................................................... 207 Brockwell, Sally, and Ken Aplin. 2020. Fauna on
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • BS4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey V2.2.Docx 3
    Brockman Syncline 4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey Prepared for Rio Tinto March 2013 Brockman Syncline 4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2013 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 817 Prepared by: David Keirle Zoë Hamilton Penny Brooshooft Document Quality Checking History Version: 1.3 Peer review: Nicola Watson Version: 2.2 Director review: Garth Humphreys Version: 2.2 Format review: Fiona Hedley Approved for issue: Garth Humphreys This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:817 (Marra Mamba Fauna):Documents:BS4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey v2.2.docx 3 Brockman Syncline 4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey 4 Cube:Current:817 (Marra Mamba Fauna):Documents:BS4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey v2.2.docx Brockman Syncline 4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey Brockman Syncline 4 Marra Mamba Targeted Fauna Survey Contents 1.0 Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methodology 9 1.3 Results 10 1.4 Conservation
    [Show full text]