DOCSLIB.ORG

Niger Delta Plant Names

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niger Delta Plant Names Nzọn plant names and uses compiled by Kay Williamson (†) from collections and identifications by Kay Williamson, A.O. Timitimi, R.A. Freemann, Clarkson Yengizifa, E.E. Efere, Joyce Lowe, B.L. Nyananyo, and others RESTRUCTURED AND CONVERTED TO UNICODE, IMAGES ADDED BY ROGER BLENCH, JANUARY 2012 1 PREFACE The present document is one of a series of electronic files left by the late Kay Williamson, being edited into a more useable format. The original was taken from a Macintosh file in a pre-Unicode format, mixing a variety of fonts. I have tried to convert it into a consistent format by checking transcriptions against other documents. I originally hoped, as with many other documents, it would be helpful to travel back to the Delta area to get confirmation and extend the database. However, security conditions in the Delta make this unlikely in the immediate future. As a consequence, the elicitation part of the document is likely to remain static. However, I am working on linking the material with the scientific literature, and inserting in photos of relevant species, as well as commenting on the vernacular names. Roger Blench Kay Williamson Educational Foundation 8, Guest Road Cambridge CB1 2AL United Kingdom Voice/ Ans 0044-(0)1223-560687 Mobile worldwide (00-44)-(0)7847-495590 E-mail [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction: background to the Delta .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background to the Delta ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Geomorphology....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Peoples and languages ............................................................................................................................ 4 Data sources...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ANNONACEAE............................................................................................................................................. 15 APOCYNACEAE........................................................................................................................................... 17 ARACEAE...................................................................................................................................................... 18 ARISTOLOCHIACEAE................................................................................................................................. 20 BALSAMINACEAE....................................................................................................................................... 21 BASELLACEAE ............................................................................................................................................ 21 BIGNONIACEAE........................................................................................................................................... 21 BIXACEAE..................................................................................................................................................... 22 BOMBACACEAE .......................................................................................................................................... 23 BORAGINACEAE ......................................................................................................................................... 23 BROMELIACEAE.......................................................................................................................................... 24 BURSERACEAE............................................................................................................................................ 24 CAPPARACEAE............................................................................................................................................ 25 CARICACEAE ............................................................................................................................................... 26 CECROPIACEAE........................................................................................................................................... 26 CHRYSOBALANACEAE.............................................................................................................................. 27 COMBRETACEAE ........................................................................................................................................ 28 COMMELINACEAE...................................................................................................................................... 29 COMPOSITAE ............................................................................................................................................... 30 COMPOSITAE-VERNONIEAE .................................................................................................................... 31 CONVOLVULACEAE................................................................................................................................... 32 COSTACEAE ................................................................................................................................................. 33 CRASSULACEAE ......................................................................................................................................... 33 CUCURBITACEAE ....................................................................................................................................... 34 CTENOLOPHONACEAE.............................................................................................................................. 35 CYPERACEAE............................................................................................................................................... 35 DAVALLIACEAE.......................................................................................................................................... 38 DIOSCOREACEAE........................................................................................................................................ 38 EBENACEAE................................................................................................................................................. 40 EUPHORBIACEAE........................................................................................................................................ 41 FLACOURTIACEAE ..................................................................................................................................... 46 GRAMINEAE................................................................................................................................................. 46 GUTTIFERAE ................................................................................................................................................ 49 HYDROPHYLLACEAE ................................................................................................................................ 51 HUMIRIACEAE............................................................................................................................................. 51 IXONANTHEACEAE.................................................................................................................................... 51 LABIATAE..................................................................................................................................................... 53 LAURACEAE................................................................................................................................................. 54 LEEACEAE .................................................................................................................................................... 55 LEGUMINOSAE-CAESALPINIOIDEAE..................................................................................................... 55 LEGUMINOSAE-MIMOSOIDEAE .............................................................................................................. 56 LEGUMINOSAE-PAPILIONOIDEAE.......................................................................................................... 57 MALVACEAE................................................................................................................................................ 62 LOGANIACEAE ............................................................................................................................................ 63 MARANTACEAE .......................................................................................................................................... 64 MELASTOMATACEAE................................................................................................................................ 66 MELIACEAE.................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical, Mechanical, and Other Properties Of
    ARC: 634.9 TA/OST 73-24 C559a PHYSICAL, MECHANICAL, AND OTHER PROPERTIES OF SELECTED SECONDARY SPECIES in Surinam, Peru, Colombia, Nigeria, Gabon, Philippines, and Malaysia FPL-AID-PASA TA(Aj)2-73 (Species Properties) * PHYSICAL, MECHANICAL, AND OTHER PROPERTIES OF SELECTED SECONDARY SPECIES LOCATED IN SURINAM, PERU, COLOMBIA, NIGERIA, GABON, PHILIPPINES, AND MALAYSIA MARTIN CHUDNOFF, Forest Products Technologist Forest Products Laboratory Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Madison, Wisconsin 53705 November 1973 Prepared for AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT U.S. Department of State Washington, DC 20523 ARC No. 634.9 - C 559a INTRODUCTION This report is a partial response to a Participating Agency Service Agreement between the Agency for Inter­ national Development and the USDA, Forest Service (PASA Control No. TA(AJ)2-73) and concerns a study of the factors influencing the utilization of the tropical forest resource. The purpose of this portion of the PASA obligation is to present previously published information on the tree and wood characteristics of selected secondary species growing m seven tropical countries. The format is concise and follows the outline developed for the second edition of the "Handbook of Hardwoods" published by HMSO, London. Species selected for review are well known in the source countries, but make up a very small component, if any, of their export trade. The reasons why these species play a secondary role in the timber harvest are discussed in the other accompanying PASA reports. ii INDEX Pages SURINAM 1-11 Audira spp. Eperu falcata Eschweilera spp. Micropholis guyanensis Nectandra spp. Ocotea spp. Parinari campestris Parinari excelsa Pouteria engleri Protium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Canarium Schweinfurthii)
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Chemical Science (IJARCS) Volume 2, Issue 11, November 2015, PP 34- 36 ISSN 2349-039X (Print) & ISSN 2349-0403 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Characterization of African Elemi (Canarium Schweinfurthii) Maduelosi N.J and Angaye S.S Department of Chemistry, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Nkpolu Oroworukwo, P M B 5080, Port Harcourt [email protected] Abstract: The physicochemical and proximate compositions of African Elemi were investigated by analyzing the moisture, crude protein, crude fat, ash content, crude fibre and total carbohydrates in the seed and pulp. The association of official analytical chemists (AOAC, 1990) methods were used. Values obtained for the physicochemical and proximate analysis of whole seeds and pulps were; seed length( 4.5cm and 6.0cm), thickness (4.0cm and 6.0cm),shape (oblong),free fatty acid content (3.52% and 3.28%), miv (1.72% and 1.70%),melting point (32oC and 30oC),moisture (25.62% and 26.09%), dry matter, ash (3.14% and 3.31), crude fat (30.06% and 30.56%), crude fibre (0.76% and 0.78%), carbohydrate (20.03% and 20.05% ), protein (19.28% and 19.31%). The results suggest that the whole seeds and pulp of African elemi (Canarium schweinfurthii ), can serve as a good source of essential nutrients for humans and livestock. KeyWords: African Elemi, Canarium schweinfurthii, pulp, seeds, proximate and physiochemical parameters. 1. INTRODUCTION The exploitation of several underutilized wild fruits and oilseeds as sources of vegetable protein, fats and vitamin C to augment supplies from the inadequate animal sources has been reported by several authors (Olaofe 1994, Ikhuoria and Maliki 2007, Dike 2010, Igidi and Edene 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • RECORDS of the HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY for 1995 Part 2: Notes1
    RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1995 Part 2: Notes1 This is the second of two parts to the Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1995 and contains the notes on Hawaiian species of plants and animals including new state and island records, range extensions, and other information. Larger, more compre- hensive treatments and papers describing new taxa are treated in the first part of this Records [Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 45]. New Hawaiian Pest Plant Records for 1995 PATRICK CONANT (Hawaii Dept. of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, 1428 S King St, Honolulu, HI 96814) Fabaceae Ulex europaeus L. New island record On 6 October 1995, Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife employee C. Joao submitted an unusual plant he found while work- ing in the Molokai Forest Reserve. The plant was identified as U. europaeus and con- firmed by a Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA) nox-A survey of the site on 9 October revealed an infestation of ca. 19 m2 at about 457 m elevation in the Kamiloa Distr., ca. 6.2 km above Kamehameha Highway. Distribution in Wagner et al. (1990, Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai‘i, p. 716) listed as Maui and Hawaii. Material examined: MOLOKAI: Molokai Forest Reserve, 4 Dec 1995, Guy Nagai s.n. (BISH). Melastomataceae Miconia calvescens DC. New island record, range extensions On 11 October, a student submitted a leaf specimen from the Wailua Houselots area on Kauai to PPC technician A. Bell, who had the specimen confirmed by David Lorence of the National Tropical Botanical Garden as being M.
    [Show full text]
  • Method to Estimate Dry-Kiln Schedules and Species Groupings: Tropical and Temperate Hardwoods
    United States Department of Agriculture Method to Estimate Forest Service Forest Dry-Kiln Schedules Products Laboratory Research and Species Groupings Paper FPL–RP–548 Tropical and Temperate Hardwoods William T. Simpson Abstract Contents Dry-kiln schedules have been developed for many wood Page species. However, one problem is that many, especially tropical species, have no recommended schedule. Another Introduction................................................................1 problem in drying tropical species is the lack of a way to Estimation of Kiln Schedules.........................................1 group them when it is impractical to fill a kiln with a single Background .............................................................1 species. This report investigates the possibility of estimating kiln schedules and grouping species for drying using basic Related Research...................................................1 specific gravity as the primary variable for prediction and grouping. In this study, kiln schedules were estimated by Current Kiln Schedules ..........................................1 establishing least squares relationships between schedule Method of Schedule Estimation...................................2 parameters and basic specific gravity. These relationships were then applied to estimate schedules for 3,237 species Estimation of Initial Conditions ..............................2 from Africa, Asia and Oceana, and Latin America. Nine drying groups were established, based on intervals of specific Estimation
    [Show full text]
  • AZOBE OCHNACEAE MAIN LOCAL NAMES Family: LOG DESCRI
    Common name: AZOBE Family: OCHNACEAE Scientific name(s): Lophira alata Lophira procera (synonymous) LOG DESCRIPTION WOOD DESCRIPTION Diameter: from 60 to 100 cm Colour: Dark red Thickness of sapwood: from 2 to 4 cm Sapwood: Clearly demarcated Floats: no Texture: Coarse Durability in forest : Good Grain: Interlocked Interlocked grain: Marked Note: Dark red to purple brown wood. Intermediate zone between sapwood and heartwood. White deposits in the pores. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Physical and mechanical properties are based on mature heartwood specimens. These properties can vary greatly depending on origin and growth conditions. mean standard deviation mean standard Density *: 1.06 g/cm3 0.04 deviation Monnin hardness*: 10.7 2.7 Crushing strength *: 96 MPa 9 Coef of volumetric shrinkage: 0.69 % 0.01 Static bending strength *: 162 MPa 21 Total tangential shrinkage: 10.3 % 0.9 Total radial shrinkage: 7.3 % 1.0 Modulus of elasticity *: 21420 MPa 3539 Fibre saturation point: 28 % Stability: Poorly stable ( * : at 12 % moisture content ; 1 MPa = 1 N/mm2 ) NATURAL DURABILITY AND TREATABILITY Fungi and termite resistance refers to end-uses under temperate climate. Except for special comments on sapwood, natural durability is based on mature heartwood. Sapwood must always be considered as non-durable against wood degrading agents. Fungi: Class 2 - durable * ensured by natural Dry wood borers: Durable; sapwood demarcated (risk limited to sapwood) durability (according Termites: Class D - Durable EN standards). Treatability: 4 - not permeable Use class*: 4 - in ground or fresh water contact Note: This species is listed in the European standard NF EN 350-2. Transitional wood has a variable durability.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Conservation Volume 6 Number 11, November 2014 ISSN 2141-243X
    International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation Volume 6 Number 11, November 2014 ISSN 2141-243X ABOUT IJBC The International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation (IJBC) (ISSN 2141-243X) is published Monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation (IJBC) provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as Information Technology and its Applications in Environmental Management and Planning, Environmental Management and Technologies, Green Technology and Environmental Conservation, Health: Environment and Sustainable Development etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in IJBC are peer reviewed. Submission of Manuscript Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript files should be given the last name of the first author Click here to Submit manuscripts online If you have any difficulty using the online submission system, kindly submit via this email [email protected]. With questions or concerns, please contact the Editorial Office at [email protected]. Editor-In-Chief Associate Editors Prof. Samir I. Ghabbour Dr. Shannon Barber-Meyer Department of Natural Resources, World Wildlife Fund Institute of African Research & Studies, Cairo 1250 24th St. NW, Washington, DC 20037 University, Egypt USA Dr. Shyam Singh Yadav Editors National Agricultural Research Institute, Papua New Guinea Dr. Edilegnaw Wale, PhD Department of Agricultural Economics School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribusiness Dr. Michael G. Andreu University of Kwazulu-Natal School of Forest Resources and Conservation P bag X 01 Scoffsville 3209 University of Florida - GCREC Pietermaritzburg 1200 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Tropical Subsistence Farms
    SELECTING THE BEST PLANTS FOR THE TROPICAL SUBSISTENCE FARM By Dr. F. W. Martin. Published in parts, 1989 and 1994; Revised 1998 and 2007 by ECHO Staff Dedication: This document is dedicated to the memory of Scott Sherman who worked as ECHO's Assistant Director until his death in January 1996. He spent countless hours corresponding with hundreds of missionaries and national workers around the world, answering technical questions and helping them select new and useful plants to evaluate. Scott took special joy in this work because he Photo by ECHO Staff knew the God who had created these plants--to be a blessing to all the nations. WHAT’S INSIDE: TABLE OF CONTENTS HOW TO FIND THE BEST PLANTS… Plants for Feeding Animals Grasses DESCRIPTIONS OF USEFUL PLANTS Legumes Plants for Food Other Feed Plants Staple Food Crops Plants for Supplemental Human Needs Cereal and Non-Leguminous Grain Fibers Pulses (Leguminous Grains) Thatching/Weaving and Clothes Roots and Tubers Timber and Fuel Woods Vegetable Crops Plants for the Farm Itself Leguminous Vegetables Crops to Conserve or Improve the Soil Non-Leguminous Fruit Vegetables Nitrogen-Fixing Trees Leafy Vegetables Miners of Deep (in Soil) Minerals Miscellaneous Vegetables Manure Crops Fruits and Nut Crops Borders Against Erosion Basic Survival Fruits Mulch High Value Fruits Cover Crops Outstanding Nuts Crops to Modify the Climate Specialty Food Crops Windbreaks Sugar, Starch, and Oil Plants for Shade Beverages, Spices and Condiment Herbs Other Special-Purpose Plants Plants for Medicinal Purposes Living Fences Copyright © ECHO 2007. All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced for training purposes if Plants for Alley Cropping distributed free of charge or at cost and credit is given to ECHO.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Tree Crops: Domestication of Companion Crops for Poverty Reduction and Environmental Services
    Expl Agric. (2001), volume 37, pp. 279±296 Printed in Great Britain Copyright # 2001 Cambridge University Press REVIEW PAPER DIVERSIFICATION OF TREE CROPS: DOMESTICATION OF COMPANION CROPS FOR POVERTY REDUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES By R. R. B. LEAKEY{ and Z. TCHOUNDJEU{ {Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, Scotland, UK and {International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, PO Box 2067, YaoundeÂ, Cameroon (Accepted 19 January 2001) SUMMARY New initiatives in agroforestry are seeking to integrate indigenous trees, whose products have traditionally been gathered from natural forests, into tropical farming systems such as cacao farms. This is being done to provide from farms, marketable timber and non-timber forest products that will enhance rural livelihoods by generating cash for resource-poor rural and peri-urban households. There are many potential candidate species for domestication that have commercial potential in local, regional or even international markets. Little or no formal research has been carried out on many of these hitherto wild species to assess potential for genetic improvement, reproductive biology or suitability for cultivation. With the participation of subsistence farmers a number of projects to bring candidate species into cultivation are in progress, however. This paper describes some tree domestication activities being carried out in southern Cameroon, especially with Irvingia gabonensis (bush mango; dika nut) and Dacryodes edulis (African plum; safoutier). As part of this, fruits and kernels from 300 D. edulis and 150 I. gabonensis trees in six villages of Cameroon and Nigeria have been quantitatively characterized for 11 traits to determine combinations de®ning multi-trait ideotypes for a genetic selection programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woods of Liberia
    THE WOODS OF LIBERIA October 1959 No. 2159 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY FOREST SERVICE MADISON 5, WISCONSIN In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin THE WOODS OF LIBERIA1 By JEANNETTE M. KRYN, Botanist and E. W. FOBES, Forester Forest Products Laboratory,2 Forest Service U. S. Department of Agriculture - - - - Introduction The forests of Liberia represent a valuable resource to that country-- especially so because they are renewable. Under good management, these forests will continue to supply mankind with products long after mined resources are exhausted. The vast treeless areas elsewhere in Africa give added emphasis to the economic significance of the forests of Liberia and its neighboring countries in West Africa. The mature forests of Liberia are composed entirely of broadleaf or hardwood tree species. These forests probably covered more than 90 percent of the country in the past, but only about one-third is now covered with them. Another one-third is covered with young forests or reproduction referred to as low bush. The mature, or "high," forests are typical of tropical evergreen or rain forests where rainfall exceeds 60 inches per year without pro­ longed dry periods. Certain species of trees in these forests, such as the cotton tree, are deciduous even when growing in the coastal area of heaviest rainfall, which averages about 190 inches per year. Deciduous species become more prevalent as the rainfall decreases in the interior, where the driest areas average about 70 inches per year. 1The information here reported was prepared in cooperation with the International Cooperation Administration. 2 Maintained at Madison, Wis., in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany and Phytomedicine of the Upper Nyong Valley Forest in Cameroon
    African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology Vol. 3(4). pp. 144-150, April, 2009 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ajpp ISSN 1996-0816 © 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Ethnobotany and phytomedicine of the upper Nyong valley forest in Cameroon T. Jiofack1*, l. Ayissi2, C. Fokunang3, N. Guedje4 and V. Kemeuze1 1Millennium Ecologic Museum, P. O Box 8038, Yaounde – Cameroon. 2Cameron Wildlife Consevation Society (CWCS – Cameroon), Cameroon. 3Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon. 4Institute of Agronomic Research for Development, National Herbarium of Cameroon, Cameroon. Accepted 24 March, 2009 This paper presents the results of an assessment of the ethnobotanical uses of some plants recorded in upper Nyong valley forest implemented by the Cameroon wildlife conservation society project (CWCS). Forestry transects in 6 localities, followed by socio-economic study were conducted in 250 local inhabitants. As results, medicinal information on 140 plants species belonging to 60 families were recorded. Local people commonly use plant parts which included leaves, bark, seed, whole plant, stem and flower to cure many diseases. According to these plants, 8% are use to treat malaria while 68% intervenes to cure several others diseases as described on. There is very high demand for medicinal plants due to prevailing economic recession; however their prices are high as a result of prevailing genetic erosion. This report highlighted the need for the improvement of effective management strategies focusing on community forestry programmes and aims to encourage local people participation in the conservation of this forest heritage to achieve a sustainable plant biodiversity and conservation for future posterity.
    [Show full text]
  • SG High Conservation Value Assessment
    Assessment of High Conservation Value on the SGSOC Concession for Oil Palm Development in South-Western Cameroon Prepared By Augustus Asamoah Ghana Wildlife Society Submitted to: SG-Sustainable Oil, Cameroon March, 2011 HCV Assessment of SGSOC Concession for Oil Palm Plantation Assessment of High Conservation Value on the SG Sustainable Oil, Cameroon Concession for Oil Palm Development in South-Western Cameroon Prepared By Augustus Asamoah (RSPO Approved Assessor) Ghana Wildlife Society P O Box 13252, Accra, Ghana Tel:++233-302665197 Cell:++233-244519719 Email: [email protected] Submitted to: SG-Sustainable Oil, Cameroon March, 2011 Cover Photo: the Fade village at the Western end of the Concession Page 1 HCV Assessment of SGSOC Concession for Oil Palm Plantation Acknowledgement Augustus Asamoah through the Ghana Wildlife Society is grateful to the management and staff of SG Sustainable Oil Cameroon, for the opportunity to carry out this work. We are particularly grateful for the recognition and support of Messrs Carmine Farnan. We would also like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Timti and his staff at SGSOC as well as Dr. Andrew Allo, Dr. Nicolas Songwe and Dennis Anye Ndeh all of H&B Consult, for their immeasurable support during the field visit to the Concession and for making available some relevant and important information for this work. Thank you all very much and we look forward to more mutually beneficial collaborations. Page 2 HCV Assessment of SGSOC Concession for Oil Palm Plantation Executive Summary Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is one of the rapidly increasing crops with large areas of forest in Southeast Asia and Sub Sahara Africa being converted into oil palm plantation.
    [Show full text]
  • BODIOA's Datasheet
    BODIOA Page 1of 4 Family: RHIZOPHORACEAE (angiosperm) Scientific name(s): Anopyxis klaineana Commercial restriction: no commercial restriction WOOD DESCRIPTION LOG DESCRIPTION Color: light brown Diameter: from 60 to 100 cm Sapwood: not clearly demarcated Thickness of sapwood: Texture: medium Floats: no Grain: straight Log durability: low (must be treated) Interlocked grain: absent Note: Wood light brown with pink or ochre shades. Grain sometimes wavy. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES MECHANICAL AND ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES Physical and mechanical properties are based on mature heartwood specimens. These properties can vary greatly depending on origin and growth conditions. Mean Std dev. Mean Std dev. Specific gravity *: 0,89 0,03 Crushing strength *: 75 MPa 10 MPa Monnin hardness *: 7,0 3,2 Static bending strength *: 132 MPa 16 MPa Coeff. of volumetric shrinkage: 0,65 % 0,05 % Modulus of elasticity *: 20290 MPa 2225 MPa Total tangential shrinkage (TS): 10,3 % 1,1 % Total radial shrinkage (RS): 6,2 % 0,4 % (*: at 12% moisture content, with 1 MPa = 1 N/mm²) TS/RS ratio: 1,7 Fiber saturation point: 30 % Stability: moderately stable NATURAL DURABILITY AND TREATABILITY Fungi and termite resistance refers to end-uses under temperate climate. Except for special comments on sapwood, natural durability is based on mature heartwood. Sapwood must always be considered as non-durable against wood degrading agents. E.N. = Euro Norm Funghi (according to E.N. standards): class 5 - not durable Dry wood borers: susceptible - sapwood not or slightly demarcated (risk in all the wood) Termites (according to E.N. standards): class D - durable Treatability (according to E.N. standards): class 1 - easily permeable Use class ensured by natural durability: class 1 - inside (no dampness) Species covering the use class 5: No Note: Prone to blue stain.
    [Show full text]