Strength Indicator Values of Theropod Long Bones, with Comments on Limb Proportions and Cursorial Potential

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strength Indicator Values of Theropod Long Bones, with Comments on Limb Proportions and Cursorial Potential GAIA N' 15, LlSBONLISBON, DEZEMBROIDECEMBER 1998, pp. 241-255 (ISSN: 0871-5424) STRENGTH INDICATOR VALUES OF THEROPOD LONG BONES, WITH COMMENTS ON LIMB PROPORTIONS AND CURSORIAL POTENTIAL Per CHRISTIANSEN Zoological Museum, Department of Vertebrates. Universitetsparken 15, OK 2100 COPEN HAG EM 0. DENMARK E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Body mass and strength indicator values of the three hindlimb long bones have been calculated for a large number oftheropod dinosaurs and compared to extant mammals of varying size and locomotory capability_Small to medium sized theropods have strength indicator values comparable to fast-moving ungulates and carnivorans, whereas all large genera have considerably lower strength indicator values, roughly comparable to elephants and hippopotamuses. This suggests that their locomotory potential was reduced compared to the smaller forms. Limb bone ratios of a large number of extant mammals clearly differen­ tiate fast-moving forms, classified from their anatomy as subcursorial or cursorial, from forms capable of less rapid locomotion, classified as graviportal and mediportal. Limb bone ratios for theropods, however, somewhat contradict the above, as all theropods group among subcursorial mammals_ Calculations on estimated peak locomotory performance in­ dicates that even large theropods could have been fast moving without having to include a suspended phase in the stride, thus not subjecting their appendicular anatomy to large amounts of stress, due to their very long limbs. INTRODUCTION However, COOMBS (1978) analyzed a long list of anatomical characters in various tetrapods and Theropod dinosaurs were the only undoubtedly found that a number of these had probably de­ carnivorous terrestrial tetrapods for most of the veloped convergently and were found in all forms ca­ Mesozoic that, at least theoretically, were large and pable of fast locomotion. Thus, he concluded that powerful enough to succesfully hunt the great vari­ they were a prerequisite for fast locomotion, as dis­ ety of herbivorous dinosaurs. As such their ability to played by extant subcursorial and cursorial animals, move fast and hunt succesfully would appear self­ and could be used to identify good running capability evident. Most large extant tetrapod hunters are ei­ in extinct animals. By far most of these characters therfast-moving, such as the Carnivora, or use cryp­ were present in theropods, even large forms, includ­ tic tactics and ambush hunting for catching prey, ing hinge-like joints, long limbs, long and slender such as crocodiles and large snakes. Theropod di­ distal limb elements, greatly reduced fibula, meta­ nosaurs anatomically resembled the former to a tarsals interlocking into a single functional unit, pes much greater extent and thus it would appear likely with median symmetry, loss of outer pedal digits, that they also displayed a similar capability for run­ digitigrade stance and reduced forelimb (bipeds ning and hunting. The gracile nature of small thero­ only). Forelimb reduction is most pronounced pods has never generated much controversy as to among large non-avian theropod taxa, whereas dro­ their running ability. Substantial controversy has maeosaurids, oviraptorosaurs, troodontids, and in arisen, however, as to the locomotory potential of part, ornithomimids, have quite long forelimbs. The large theropods. Although some authors have cred­ hindlimb is still the largest and strongest, however. ited the largest theropods with top speeds of around Non-avian theropods retained just one non­ 20 m.s-' (BAKKER, 1986; PAUL, 1988), they have cursorial trait, a long femur. Unlike birds femoral re­ _most often been considered too large to have been traction was a very important part of forwards pro­ fast-moving and have usually been credited with a pulsion in most forms (PAUL, 1988; GATESY, 1990, walking gait only (e.g. LAMBE, 1917; NEWMAN, 1970; 1991 ). COLINVAUX, 1978; HALSTEAD & HALSTEAD, 1981; THULBORN, 1982; BARSBOLD, 1983). HOLTZ (1994) found that ornithomimids, troodon­ tids, elmisaurids, avimimids and, most importantly, 241 artigos/papers P. CHRISTIANSEN the large to gigantic tyrannosaurids, possessed an lometric trends to extant mammals (CHRISTIANSEN , unusual metatarsal structure, which he termed the 1999c). It is difficultto assess how this would further arctometatarsus, where the third metatarsal is be affected once extinct animals, which lack extant greatly reduced proximally and the three metatar­ anatomical analogs, such as non-avian theropods, sals interlock tightly. In certain arctometatarsalian were included. Still the approximation towards loco­ forms such as Elmisaurus OSM6LSKA (OSM6LSKA, motory dynamic similarity displayed by extant ani­ 1981) and Avimimus KURZANOV (KURZANOV, 1987) mals of widely different sizes and morphology, the distal tarsals and proximal parts of metatarsals suggests that it is reasonable to suppose that this II-IV co-ossify into a tarsometatarsus, a condition wou ld have been the case for dinosaurs also. reminiscent of certain "alvarezsaurid theropods" When an animal moves, forces act on the limbs (BONAPARTE, 1996), although not Mononykus which are proportional to mg, where m is body mass PERLE, NORELL, CHIAPPE & CLARK (PERLE et al., and g is the gravitational constant. Peak stress in the 1994). long bones occur in the middle of a stride, where thJ) The arctometatarsalian genera have a longer greatest fraction of body mass is supported (ALEX­ metatarsus at any given limb length, a trait best inter­ ANDER, 1977a; BIEWENER, 1983), and it is conven­ preted as an adaptation to increased cursoriality, ient to divide the stress into two major components, and HOLTZ (1994) showed that it was not biome­ an axial component, setting up compressive stress chanically weaker despite its increased length. Fur­ in the diaphysis, and a transverse component, act­ thermore, virtually all non-avian theropods ing to distort the diaphysis about its long axis in the possessed a very similar appendicular anatomy parasagittal plane (ALEXANDER, 1977a; 1985; 1989; (BAKKER, 1986; PAUL, 1987, 1988, 1991; GATESY& 1991). MIDDLETON, 1997), and according to the Principle of The compressive stress is proportional to cross Uniformitarianism, this would imply that the large sectional area but is usually much less important theropods should have retained the ability to move than the transverse stress (ALEXANDER, 1989). As fast, albeit probably slower relative to body size the forces acting on the limbs are proportional to mg, (COOMBS, 1978). If an animal is capable of fast loco­ the peak transverse stress in the diaphysis is pro­ motion its limbs must be stronger, at any given size, portional to amgxJZ (ALEXANDER , 1977a, 1983a, than animals which move more slowly. Thus the 1985, 1989 1991; ALEXANDER & POND, 1992), strength of the limb bones constitutes an additional where Z is the section modulus of a cross section of parameter for evaluation of theropod locomotor ca­ bone for bending in a parasagittal plane, and x is the pability. Previously this has only been investigated distance from this cross section to the epiphysis. for very few species, probably due to difficulty of ob­ The value a is the fraction of body mass supported taining the necessary parameters, such as bone di­ by fore and hind limbs respectively, and applies on ly mensions and body mass. to quadrupedal animals. A higher value of Z thus re­ Most extant animals tend to move in a roughly dy­ duces peak stress at any given body mass and simi­ namical fashion when their Froude numbers (v2/gl) lar bone length. As such ALEXANDER (1983a; 1985; are alike, even when comparing animals of such dif­ 1989) argued that the reciprocal value Z/amgx ferent physical appearance as ostriches, humans would be a useful indicator of the ability ufthe bone~ and mammalian quadrupeds varying four orders of to resist mechanical failure, and a high value of magnitude in mass (ALEXANDER, 1976, 1989, 1991; Zlamgx indicates a potential for enhanced physical ALEXANDER & JAYES, 1983), although very small activity. Bone from a variety of extant animals ap­ mammals do not appear to conform to this principle pears not to have different mechanical properties (ALEXANDER, 1991). The Froude number is a dimen­ (BIEWENER, 1982; 1990) so the dimensions of a sionless number relating absolute speed (v) to a lin­ bone section appears to constitute a good measure ear dimension (I), in this case limb length, and for assessing its strength. gravitation (g). Dynamic similarity implies that any In orderforthis to apply to extinct animals one im­ differences between moving animals could be can­ portant, and often overlooked, factor must be ad­ celled out by a constant multiple of the linear dimen­ dressed. All structures, whether biological or man sions, time intervals or forces involved (ALEXANDER made, are constructed with a given factor of safety, & JAYES, 1983). which is the relationship between the yeld stress of However, extant animals are not strictly geomet­ the structure and peak stress experimented. Fortu­ ric in their physical proportions, but scale with in­ nately, among extant biological structures of support creasing allometry as linear dimensions increase the safety factors appearto vary remarkably litte and (e.g. PROTHERO & SERENO, 1982; ECONOMOS , are in the order of 2-4 (ALEXANDER, 1981 ; BIEWE­ 1983; BIEWENER, 1989a, 1989b; BERTRAM & BIEWE­ NER, 1989a, 1989b, 1990). It is not possible to as­ NER, 1990, CHRISTIANSEN, 1999a, 1999b):theropod sess if this was
Recommended publications
  • 1.1 První Chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV GEOLOGICKÝCH VĚD Jakub Březina Rešerše k bakalářské práci Využití mikrostruktur klů neogenních chobotnatců na příkladu rodu Zygolophodon Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Martin Ivanov, Dr. Brno 2012 OBSAH 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců 3 1.1 První chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2. Kly chobotnatců a jejich mikrostruktura 9 2.1 Přírůstky v klech chobotnatců 11 2.1.1 Využití přírůstků v klech chobotnatců 11 2.2 Schregerův vzor 12 2.2.1 Stavba Schregerova vzoru 12 2.2.2 Využití Schregerova vzoru 12 2.3 Dentinové kanálky 15 3 Sedimenty s nálezy savců v okolí Mikulova 16 3.1 Baden 17 3.2 Pannon a Pont 18 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců Současná systematika chobotnatců není kompletně odvozena od jejich fylogeneze, rekonstruované pomocí kladistických metod. Diskutované skupiny tak mnohdy nepředstavují monofyletické skupiny. Přestože jsou taxonomické kategorie matoucí (např. Laurin 2005), jsem do jisté míry nucen je používat. Některým skupinám úrovně stále přiřazeny nebyly a zde této skutečnosti není přisuzován žádný význam. V této rešerši jsem se zaměřil hlavně na poznatky, které následovaly po vydání knihy; The Proboscidea: Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives, od Shoshaniho a Tassyho (1996). Chobotnatci jsou součástí skupiny Tethytheria společně s anthracobunidy, sirénami a desmostylidy (Shoshani 1998; Shoshani & Tassy 1996; 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009). Základní klasifikace sestává ze dvou skupin. Ze skupiny Plesielephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Numidotheriidae, Barytheriidae a Deinotheridae a ze skupiny Elephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Palaeomastodontidae, Phiomiidae, Mammutida, Gomphotheriidae, tetralofodontní gomfotéria, Stegodontidae a Elephantidae (Shoshani & Marchant 2001; Shoshani & Tassy 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW AMEBELODONT, TORYNOBELODON BARNUMBROWNI, SP. NOV. a PRELIMINARY REPORT Erwin Hinckley Barbour
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska State Museum 1931 A NEW AMEBELODONT, TORYNOBELODON BARNUMBROWNI, SP. NOV. A PRELIMINARY REPORT Erwin Hinckley Barbour Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, Paleontology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1/ 6 . BULLETIN 22 VOLUME I UN 1~l:7Gtrs;:J:~~!1 L'P' i THE NEBRASKA STATE USEUM I tor ERWIN H. BARBOUR, Dir NUl :~,~I r ~;l A NEW AMEBELODONT, TOR :I.,I,lI..LJ.J;I.c.uUJ.J~m.T-~ ___I BARNUMBROWNI, SP. NOV. A PRELIMINARY REPORT By ERWIN HINCKLEY BARBOUR The subfamily of longirostrine mastodonts known as the Amebelodontinae have been so recently discovered and described that as yet theY; are little known by the citizens of this state. They are most briefly and directly described as shovel-tusked mastodons. The first one found, namely Amebelodon fricki, was secured in April 1927, and was pub­ lished June 1927. In the meantime, many other examples of Amebelodonts have been added to the Morrill Palaeon­ tological Collections of the Nebraska State Museum. The exact number cannot be stated until the material shipped in from the field during the current season is unpacked, cleaned, and identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Species List E to M
    Dinosaur Species List E to M E F G • Echinodon becklesii • Fabrosaurus australis • Gallimimus bullatus • Edmarka rex • Frenguellisaurus • Garudimimus brevipes • Edmontonia longiceps ischigualastensis • Gasosaurus constructus • Edmontonia rugosidens • Fulengia youngi • Gasparinisaura • Edmontosaurus annectens • Fulgurotherium australe cincosaltensis • Edmontosaurus regalis • Genusaurus sisteronis • Edmontosaurus • Genyodectes serus saskatchewanensis • Geranosaurus atavus • Einiosaurus procurvicornis • Gigantosaurus africanus • Elaphrosaurus bambergi • Giganotosaurus carolinii • Elaphrosaurus gautieri • Gigantosaurus dixeyi • Elaphrosaurus iguidiensis • Gigantosaurus megalonyx • Elmisaurus elegans • Gigantosaurus robustus • Elmisaurus rarus • Gigantoscelus • Elopteryx nopcsai molengraaffi • Elosaurus parvus • Gilmoreosaurus • Emausaurus ernsti mongoliensis • Embasaurus minax • Giraffotitan altithorax • Enigmosaurus • Gongbusaurus shiyii mongoliensis • Gongbusaurus • Eoceratops canadensis wucaiwanensis • Eoraptor lunensis • Gorgosaurus lancensis • Epachthosaurus sciuttoi • Gorgosaurus lancinator • Epanterias amplexus • Gorgosaurus libratus • Erectopus sauvagei • "Gorgosaurus" novojilovi • Erectopus superbus • Gorgosaurus sternbergi • Erlikosaurus andrewsi • Goyocephale lattimorei • Eucamerotus foxi • Gravitholus albertae • Eucercosaurus • Gresslyosaurus ingens tanyspondylus • Gresslyosaurus robustus • Eucnemesaurus fortis • Gresslyosaurus torgeri • Euhelopus zdanskyi • Gryponyx africanus • Euoplocephalus tutus • Gryponyx taylori • Euronychodon
    [Show full text]
  • Paleobiogeography of Trilophodont Gomphotheres (Mammalia: Proboscidea)
    Revista Mexicana deTrilophodont Ciencias Geológicas, gomphotheres. v. 28, Anúm. reconstruction 2, 2011, p. applying235-244 DIVA (Dispersion-Vicariance Analysis) 235 Paleobiogeography of trilophodont gomphotheres (Mammalia: Proboscidea). A reconstruction applying DIVA (Dispersion-Vicariance Analysis) María Teresa Alberdi1,*, José Luis Prado2, Edgardo Ortiz-Jaureguizar3, Paula Posadas3, and Mariano Donato1 1 Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, España. 2 INCUAPA, Departamento de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional del Centro, Del Valle 5737, B7400JWI Olavarría, Argentina. 3 LASBE, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque S/Nº, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina. * [email protected] ABSTRACT The objective of our paper was to analyze the distributional patterns of trilophodont gomphotheres, applying an event-based biogeographic method. We have attempted to interpret the biogeographical history of trilophodont gomphotheres in the context of the geological evolution of the continents they inhabited during the Cenozoic. To reconstruct this biogeographic history we used DIVA 1.1. This application resulted in an exact solution requiring three vicariant events, and 15 dispersal events, most of them (i.e., 14) occurring at terminal taxa. The single dispersal event at an internal node affected the common ancestor to Sinomastodon plus the clade Cuvieronius – Stegomastodon. A vicariant event took place which resulted in two isolated groups: (1) Amebelodontinae (Africa – Europe – Asia) and (2) Gomphotheriinae (North America). The Amebelodontinae clade was split by a second vicariant event into Archaeobelodon (Africa and Europe), and the ancestors of the remaining genera of the clade (Asia). In contrast, the Gomphotheriinae clade evolved mainly in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to Other North American Proboscidean Taxa
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2019 Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa Brenna Hart-Farrar East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleobiology Commons Recommended Citation Hart-Farrar, Brenna, "Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3680. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3680 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa _________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _________________________________ by Brenna J. Hart-Farrar December 2019 _________________________________ Steven C. Wallace, Chair Chris. Widga Blaine W. Schubert Keywords: Gray Fossil Site, Mammut, Mastodon, Morphology, Manus ABSTRACT Manus descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa by Brenna J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Little Dinosaurs Free
    FREE TEN LITTLE DINOSAURS PDF Mike Brownlow,Simon Rickerty | 32 pages | 01 Oct 2015 | Hachette Children's Group | 9781408334010 | English | London, United Kingdom The First Dinosaurs A period of great transformation, Ten Little Dinosaurs Late Cretaceous Period is when the dinosaurs disappeared from the earth. Learn more about the Late Cretaceous dinosaurs that existed during this era, such as the Ten Little Dinosaurs, Gallimimus, and Brachylophosaurus. Tyrannosaurus rex, one of the fiercest meat-eaters ever, is the animal that probably springs to mind when most of us hear the word "dinosaur. It shared the Cretaceous landscape Ten Little Dinosaurs, and probably was preyed upon by, Tyrannosaurus rex. Constantly compared to the Tyrannosaurus rex, the Giganotosaurus was one of a handful of dinosaurs that rivaled, or possibly exceeded, the creature in size. University of Kansas paleontologists Ten Little Dinosaurs comparing the bones of a new T. Could this exciting find help bridge the gaps Ten Little Dinosaurs Africa's late Cretaceous fossil record and that of other continents? OK, hop in your time machine and go back 67 million years or so to the Cretaceous period. Then find a Tyrannosaurus rex and challenge it to a race. Sounds crazy, huh? Could you really outrun a Tyrannosaurus rex? Learn about Monoclonius, Late Cretaceous dinosaurs and dinosaurs Ten Little Dinosaurs all eras. The recently discovered large theropod Abelisaurus comahuensis, from Patagonia is argentina, looked a little like Albertosaurus from Alberta, Canada, particularly in its size and lifestyle. Find out more about the Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Albertosaurus was an older "cousin" to the better-known Tyrannosaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 2011 ART& ANIMALS in THIS ISSUE Sunday with Celebrated at Morrill Hall April 2 a Scientist
    NEWS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM theMammoth MAY 2011 ART& ANIMALS IN THIS ISSUE Sunday with Celebrated at Morrill Hall April 2 a Scientist The 3rd annual Colorful Creature Day was held April 2 at Morrill Hall. Over 1,100 visitors of all ages came out for this fun-filled afternoon of live animals and hands-on art activities in the Museum. Read more about this event on page 12! Museum Memories ..........................6-8 A Walk Through Time .......................9-11 Colorful Creature Day .......................12 Agate Fossil Beds: New Fossil Find Marks 30 Years of Discovery........... 14-15 Sunday with a Scientist ...................16-17 Trailside Turns 50! ...........................18 & MORE The Mammoth is available in color online! friendsofthemuseum.org MORRILL FRIENDS UNIVERSITY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS NEBRASKA HALL Mark A. Brohman, President STATE MUSEUM STAFF CALENDAR Lois Mayo, Vice President EX-OFFICIO AT A GLANCE David Rowe, Treasurer Priscilla C. Grew Director: Priscilla C. Grew Diane Pratt, Secretary Mike Madcharo Associate Director: Mark Harris Karen Amen Marcia Hollestelle ADVISORY COUNCIL Informal Science Education: Judy Diamond, Curator June 19 Michael Leite Judy Diamond Amy Spiegel Keely Rennie-Tucker Connie Pejsar 1:30-4:30 p.m. Lynn Sobotka Norm Smith Sunday with a Scientist Education Coordinator: Kathy French Diann Sorensen Mike Zeleny Museum Associates: Ann Cusick “Tissue Mechanics: Mark Sorensen Cindy Loope Engineering Better Heart Mel Thornton ASHFALL CHAPTER Annie Mumgaard Health” Natasha Vavra Mark Brogie, Ina Van der Veen Art Zygielbaum President July 17 Research Partnerships Coordinator: Brett Ratcliffe 1:30-4:30 p.m. Sunday with a Scientist Anthropology: Alan Osborn, Curator CONTACT INFORMATION NAGPRA/Collections Assistant: Susan Curtis “Fish” Director’s Office (402) 472-3779 Nebraska Archaeological Survey: Alan Osborn August 21 Museum Information Line (402) 472-2642 School Program Reservations (402) 472-6302 Botany: Robert Kaul, Curator 1:30-4:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY of SCIENCE Volume 98 2018
    PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Volume 98 2018 EDITOR: Mostafa Elshahed Production Editor: Tammy Austin Business Manager: T. David Bass The Official Organ of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Which was established in 1909 for the purpose of stimulating scientific research; to promote fraternal relationships among those engaged in scientific work in Oklahoma; to diffuse among the citizens of the State a knowledge of the various departments of science; and to investigate and make known the material, educational, and other resources of the State. Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Publication Date: January 2019 ii POLICIES OF THE PROCEEDINGS The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science contains papers on topics of interest to scientists. The goal is to publish clear communications of scientific findings and of matters of general concern for scientists in Oklahoma, and to serve as a creative outlet for other scientific contributions by scientists. ©2018 Oklahoma Academy of Science The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy Base and/or other appropriate repository. of Science contains reports that describe the Information necessary for retrieval of the results of original scientific investigation data from the repository will be specified in (including social science). Papers are received a reference in the paper. with the understanding that they have not been published previously or submitted for 4. Manuscripts that report research involving publication elsewhere. The papers should be human subjects or the use of materials of significant scientific quality, intelligible to a from human organs must be supported by broad scientific audience, and should represent a copy of the document authorizing the research conducted in accordance with accepted research and signed by the appropriate procedures and scientific ethics (proper subject official(s) of the institution where the work treatment and honesty).
    [Show full text]
  • P a L a E O N T O G R a P H I C A
    P A L A E O N T O G R A P H I C A CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE PAST FOUNDED BY J. F. POMPECKJ IN BERLIN WITH THE COOPERATION OF F. BROILI, O. JAEKEL, H. RAUFF AND G. STEINMANN AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GERMAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY SUPPLEMENT VII 1ST. PART, VOLUME I SUPPLEMENT I. C O N T E N T S : SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE TENDAGURU EXPEDITION 1909-1912 W. JANENSCH: THE COELUROSAURS AND THEROPODS OF THE TENDAGURU FORMATION, GERMAN EAST AFRICA (PAGES 1-100 WITH PLATES I-IX AND 32 TEXT-FIGURES) S T U T T G A R T S C H W E I Z E R B A R T ' S P U B L I S H I N G H O U S E ( E R W I N N Ä G E L E ) G. M. B. H. 1 9 2 5 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE TENDAGURU EXPEDITION 1909-1912 N E W R E S U L T S FOUNDED BY GEOLOGICAL-PALEONTOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AND MUSEUM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN THROUGH W. JANENSCH IN BERLIN S T U T T G A R T S C H W E I Z E R B A R T ' S P U B L I S H I N G H O U S E ( E R W I N N Ä G E L E ) G. M. B. H. 1 9 2 5 THE COELUROSAURS AND THEROPODS OF THE TENDAGURU FORMATION GERMAN EAST AFRICA BY W.
    [Show full text]
  • Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria
    8 Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria Matthew T. Carrano Introduction The evolution of body size and its influence on organismal biology have received scientific attention since the earliest decades of evolutionary study (e.g., Cope, 1887, 1896; Thompson, 1917). Both paleontologists and neontologists have attempted to determine correlations between body size and numerous aspects of life history, with the ultimate goal of docu- menting both the predictive and causal connections involved (LaBarbera, 1986, 1989). These studies have generated an appreciation for the thor- oughgoing interrelationships between body size and nearly every sig- nificant facet of organismal biology, including metabolism (Lindstedt & Calder, 1981; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; McNab, 1989), population ecology (Damuth, 1981; Juanes, 1986; Gittleman & Purvis, 1998), locomotion (Mc- Mahon, 1975; Biewener, 1989; Alexander, 1996), and reproduction (Alex- ander, 1996). An enduring focus of these studies has been Cope’s Rule, the notion that body size tends to increase over time within lineages (Kurtén, 1953; Stanley, 1973; Polly, 1998). Such an observation has been made regarding many different clades but has been examined specifically in only a few (MacFadden, 1986; Arnold et al., 1995; Jablonski, 1996, 1997; Trammer & Kaim, 1997, 1999; Alroy, 1998). The discordant results of such analyses have underscored two points: (1) Cope’s Rule does not apply universally to all groups; and (2) even when present, size increases in different clades may reflect very different underlying processes. Thus, the question, “does Cope’s Rule exist?” is better parsed into two questions: “to which groups does Cope’s Rule apply?” and “what process is responsible for it in each?” Several recent works (McShea, 1994, 2000; Jablonski, 1997; Alroy, 1998, 2000a, 2000b) have begun to address these more specific questions, attempting to quantify patterns of body-size evolution in a phylogenetic (rather than strictly temporal) context, as well as developing methods for interpreting the resultant patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptors in Action 1 Suggested Pre-Visit Activities
    PROGRAM OVERVIEW TOPIC: Small theropods commonly known as “raptors.” THEME: Explore the adaptations that made raptors unique and successful, like claws, intelligence, vision, speed, and hollow bones. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Razor-sharp teeth and sickle-like claws are just a few of the characteristics that have made raptors famous. Working in groups, students will build a working model of a raptor leg and then bring it to life while competing in a relay race that simulates the hunting techniques of these carnivorous animals. AUDIENCE: Grades 3–6 CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS: Grade 3 Science: Building with a Variety of Materials Grade 3–6 Math: Patterns and Relations Grade 4 Science: Building Devices and Vehicles that Move Grade 6 Science: Evidence and Investigation PROGRAM ObJECTIVES: 1. Students will understand the adaptations that contributed to the success of small theropods. 2. Students will explore the function of the muscles used in vertebrate movement and the mechanics of how a raptor leg works. 3. Students will understand the function of the raptorial claw. 4. Students will discover connections between small theropod dinosaurs and birds. SUGGESTED PRE-VISIT ACTIVITIES UNDERstANDING CLADIstICS Animals and plants are often referred to as part of a family or group. For example, the dog is part of the canine family (along with wolves, coyotes, foxes, etc.). Scientists group living things together based on relationships to gain insight into where they came from. This helps us identify common ancestors of different organisms. This method of grouping is called “cladistics.” Cladistics is a system that uses branches like a family tree to show how organisms are related to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithomimids from the Nemegt Formation of Mongolia
    J. Paleont. Soc. Korea. Vol. 22, No. 1, (2006) : p. 195-207 ORNITHOMIMIDS FROM THE NEMEGT FORMATION OF MONGOLIA Yoshitsugu Kobayashi1 and Rinchen Barsbold2 1Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810 Japan, [email protected] 2Paleontological Center of Mongolian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 260, Ulaan Bataar 210351, Mongolia, [email protected] Abstract: Two ornithomimids (Gallimimus bullatus and Anserimimus planinychus) and an enigmatic ornithomi- mid (Deinocheirus mirificus) from the Nemegt Formation (Maastrichtian) of Mongolia are reviewed in this study. Gallimimus bullatus is one of the best-known ornithomimids, but its diagnoses need to be revised. The length ratio of the manus/humerus in Gallimimus bullatusis 0.61. This is the smallest value in ornithomimosaurs (approximately 0.8 or more in other ornithomimosaurs) and may be a good character to diagnose Gallimimus bullatus as suggested by previous studies. Anserimimus planinychus is a unique ornithomimosaur in having strong deltopectoral crest of the humerus, dorsoventrally flat and nearly straight manual unguals, and long forelimbs. Anserimimus planinychus shares two characters (position of the biceps tubercle and alignment of the glenoid) with Gallimimus bullatus and has a long metacarpal I as in Ornithomimus edmontonicus (derived ornithomimosaur) and a long metacarpal III as in Harpymimus okladnikovi (primitive ornithomimosaur). The phylogenetic position of Deinocheirus mirificus has been problematic since its discovery. Preliminary
    [Show full text]