DOCSLIB.ORG

Ten Little Dinosaurs Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ten Little Dinosaurs Free FREE TEN LITTLE DINOSAURS PDF Mike Brownlow,Simon Rickerty | 32 pages | 01 Oct 2015 | Hachette Children's Group | 9781408334010 | English | London, United Kingdom The First Dinosaurs A period of great transformation, Ten Little Dinosaurs Late Cretaceous Period is when the dinosaurs disappeared from the earth. Learn more about the Late Cretaceous dinosaurs that existed during this era, such as the Ten Little Dinosaurs, Gallimimus, and Brachylophosaurus. Tyrannosaurus rex, one of the fiercest meat-eaters ever, is the animal that probably springs to mind when most of us hear the word "dinosaur. It shared the Cretaceous landscape Ten Little Dinosaurs, and probably was preyed upon by, Tyrannosaurus rex. Constantly compared to the Tyrannosaurus rex, the Giganotosaurus was one of a handful of dinosaurs that rivaled, or possibly exceeded, the creature in size. University of Kansas paleontologists Ten Little Dinosaurs comparing the bones of a new T. Could this exciting find help bridge the gaps Ten Little Dinosaurs Africa's late Cretaceous fossil record and that of other continents? OK, hop in your time machine and go back 67 million years or so to the Cretaceous period. Then find a Tyrannosaurus rex and challenge it to a race. Sounds crazy, huh? Could you really outrun a Tyrannosaurus rex? Learn about Monoclonius, Late Cretaceous dinosaurs and dinosaurs Ten Little Dinosaurs all eras. The recently discovered large theropod Abelisaurus comahuensis, from Patagonia is argentina, looked a little like Albertosaurus from Alberta, Canada, particularly in its size and lifestyle. Find out more about the Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Albertosaurus was an older "cousin" to the better-known Tyrannosaurus. In many ways the two were similar: the head was large compared to the body, the tiny forearms had only two fingers each is and the long tail balanced the body over two powerful back legs. Anchiceratops was discovered along the Red Deer River in Alberta in Learn more about the Anchiceratops and Late Cretaceous Dinosaurs. The ornithomimid is anserimimus, has the name "goose mimic. With a thigh bone over seven and a half feet long, longer than any other femur known is antarctosaurus was a sauropod of spectacular proportions. Find out more about this and other Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Aralosaurus Ten Little Dinosaurs from Kazakhstan in the Soviet Union. It is known only from a nearly complete skull that is missing the front of the snout and all of the lower jaw, but no skeleton. Learn more about this Late Cretaceous duckbilled dinosaur. InBritish paleontologist Richard Lydekker published the first description of sauropod dinosaurs from South America that had been unearthed in Ten Little Dinosaurs is argentina. One of these was the Argyrosaurus. Learn more about this Late Cretaceous dinosaur. Arrhinoceratops is a rare ceratopsian known from only one skull that lacks a lower jaw. This single specimen was found in Ten Little Dinosaurs the Red Deer River of Alberta by an expedition from the University of Toronto. This carnivorous Ten Little Dinosaurs was named more than one hundred years ago for an unusual tooth found in the Judith River Badlands of northern Montana. When it was discovered, much of the West was still wild. Ten Little Dinosaurs lammersi was a small ceratopsid known from a single skeleton found in the Judith River Formation of Montana in Learn Ten Little Dinosaurs about the Avaceratops and other Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Avimimus 'bird mimic' was a small, lightly built theropod from the Upper Cretaceous Ten Little Dinosaurs Formation of Mongolia. Learn more about the Avimimus and other Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Bactrosaurus "reptile from Bactria" Ten Little Dinosaurs known from many skull and skeletal pieces, but not a complete skeleton. Learn more about the Bactrosaurus and other Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Bagaceratops rozhdestvenskyi was a small protoceratopsian with a big name: "baga" is the Mongolian word for "small," "ceratops" means "horned face," and the species name is in honor of Russian paleontologist A. Learn more about Late Cretaceous dinosaurs. Late Cretaceous Dinosaurs. Who Owns the Rights to a Dinosaur Skeleton? Learn More. Tyrannosaurus Rex Was the Tyrant Lizard King Tyrannosaurus rex, one of the fiercest meat-eaters ever, is Ten Little Dinosaurs animal that probably springs to mind when most of us hear the word "dinosaur. Giganotosaurus Was One of the Largest Carnivorous Dinosaurs That Ever Lived Constantly compared to the Tyrannosaurus rex, the Giganotosaurus was one of a handful of dinosaurs that rivaled, or possibly exceeded, the creature in size. Possible 'Baby' T. Why Did the T. Rex Have Such Puny Arms? Tyrannosaurus rex was a giant predator that roamed the earth, so why did it have such tiny arms? By the Editors of Publications International, Ltd. Abelisaurus The recently discovered large theropod Abelisaurus comahuensis, from Patagonia is argentina, looked a little like Albertosaurus from Alberta, Canada, particularly in its size and lifestyle. Albertosaurus Ten Little Dinosaurs was an older "cousin" to the better-known Tyrannosaurus. Anserimimus The ornithomimid is anserimimus, has the name "goose mimic. Antarctosaurus With a thigh bone over seven and a half feet long, longer than any other femur known is antarctosaurus was a sauropod of spectacular proportions. Aralosaurus Aralosaurus is from Kazakhstan in the Soviet Union. Argyrosaurus InBritish paleontologist Richard Lydekker published the first description of sauropod dinosaurs from South America that had been unearthed in Patagonia is argentina. Arrhinoceratops Arrhinoceratops is a rare ceratopsian known from only one skull that lacks a lower jaw. Aublysodon This carnivorous dinosaur was named more than one Ten Little Dinosaurs years ago for an unusual tooth found in the Judith River Badlands of northern Montana. Avaceratops Avaceratops lammersi was a small ceratopsid known from a single skeleton found in the Judith River Formation of Montana in Avimimus Avimimus 'bird mimic' was a small, lightly built theropod from the Upper Cretaceous Djadokhta Formation of Mongolia. Bactrosaurus Bactrosaurus "reptile from Bactria" is known from many skull and skeletal pieces, but not a complete skeleton. Bagaceratops Bagaceratops rozhdestvenskyi was a small protoceratopsian with a big name: "baga" is the Mongolian word for "small," "ceratops" means "horned face," and the species name is in honor of Russian paleontologist A. Late Cretaceous Dinosaurs | HowStuffWorks If you really want to know how fast a given dinosaur could run, there's one thing you need to do right off the bat: Forget everything you've seen in the movies and on TV. Physiologically speaking, there were three major constraints on dinosaur locomotion: size, metabolism, and body plan. Size gives some very clear clues: There's simply no Ten Little Dinosaurs way that a ton titanosaur could have moved faster than a car looking for a parking space. Yes, modern giraffes are vaguely reminiscent of sauropods, and can move speedily when provoked—but giraffes are orders of magnitude smaller than the biggest dinosaurs, not even approaching a single ton in weight. Ten Little Dinosaurs contrast, lighter plant-eaters—picture a wiry, two-legged, pound ornithopod —could run significantly faster than their lumbering cousins. The speed of dinosaurs can also be inferred from their body plans—that is, the relative sizes of their arms, legs, and trunks. On the other side of the dinosaur divide, there's some controversy about whether the short arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex would have vastly constrained its running speed for example, if an individual stumbled while chasing its prey, it might have fallen down and broken its neck! Finally, and most controversially, there's Ten Little Dinosaurs issue of whether dinosaurs possessed endothermic "warm-blooded" or ectothermic "cold-blooded" metabolisms. In order to run at a fast pace for extended periods of time, an animal must generate a steady supply of internal metabolic energy, which usually necessitates a warm-blooded physiology. Most paleontologists now believe that the vast majority of meat-eating dinosaurs were endothermic though the same doesn't necessarily apply to their plant-eating cousins and that the smaller, feathered varieties Ten Little Dinosaurs have been capable of leopard-like bursts of speed. Paleontologists do have one strand of forensic evidence for judging dinosaur locomotion: preserved footprintsTen Little Dinosaurs "ichnofossils," One or two footprints can tell us a lot about any given dinosaur, including its type theropod, sauropod, etc. If Ten Little Dinosaurs series of footprints can be attributed to a single individual, it may be possible, based on the spacing and depth of the impressions, to draw tentative conclusions about that dinosaur's running speed. The problem is that even isolated dinosaur footprints are phenomenally Ten Little Dinosaurs, much less an extended set of tracks. There are also many difficulties in interpreting the Ten Little Dinosaurs. For example, an interlaced set of footprints, one belonging to a small ornithopod and one to a larger theropod Ten Little Dinosaurs, may be construed as evidence of a million-year-old chase to the death, but it may also be that the tracks were laid down days, months, or even decades apart. Some of the evidence leads to more certain interpretation: The fact that dinosaur footprints are virtually never accompanied by dinosaur tail marks support the theory that dinosaurs held their tails off the ground when running, which may have slightly boosted their speed. Now that we've laid the groundwork, we can come to some tentative conclusions about which dinosaurs were the flat-out fastest. With their long, muscular legs and ostrich-like builds, the clear champions were the ornithomimid "bird mimic" Ten Little Dinosaurs, which may have been capable of reaching top speeds of 40 to 50 miles per hour. If bird mimics like Gallimimus and Dromiceiomimus were covered with insulating feathers, as seems likely, that would be evidence Ten Little Dinosaurs the warm-blooded metabolisms necessary to sustain such speeds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria
    8 Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria Matthew T. Carrano Introduction The evolution of body size and its influence on organismal biology have received scientific attention since the earliest decades of evolutionary study (e.g., Cope, 1887, 1896; Thompson, 1917). Both paleontologists and neontologists have attempted to determine correlations between body size and numerous aspects of life history, with the ultimate goal of docu- menting both the predictive and causal connections involved (LaBarbera, 1986, 1989). These studies have generated an appreciation for the thor- oughgoing interrelationships between body size and nearly every sig- nificant facet of organismal biology, including metabolism (Lindstedt & Calder, 1981; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; McNab, 1989), population ecology (Damuth, 1981; Juanes, 1986; Gittleman & Purvis, 1998), locomotion (Mc- Mahon, 1975; Biewener, 1989; Alexander, 1996), and reproduction (Alex- ander, 1996). An enduring focus of these studies has been Cope’s Rule, the notion that body size tends to increase over time within lineages (Kurtén, 1953; Stanley, 1973; Polly, 1998). Such an observation has been made regarding many different clades but has been examined specifically in only a few (MacFadden, 1986; Arnold et al., 1995; Jablonski, 1996, 1997; Trammer & Kaim, 1997, 1999; Alroy, 1998). The discordant results of such analyses have underscored two points: (1) Cope’s Rule does not apply universally to all groups; and (2) even when present, size increases in different clades may reflect very different underlying processes. Thus, the question, “does Cope’s Rule exist?” is better parsed into two questions: “to which groups does Cope’s Rule apply?” and “what process is responsible for it in each?” Several recent works (McShea, 1994, 2000; Jablonski, 1997; Alroy, 1998, 2000a, 2000b) have begun to address these more specific questions, attempting to quantify patterns of body-size evolution in a phylogenetic (rather than strictly temporal) context, as well as developing methods for interpreting the resultant patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptors in Action 1 Suggested Pre-Visit Activities
    PROGRAM OVERVIEW TOPIC: Small theropods commonly known as “raptors.” THEME: Explore the adaptations that made raptors unique and successful, like claws, intelligence, vision, speed, and hollow bones. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Razor-sharp teeth and sickle-like claws are just a few of the characteristics that have made raptors famous. Working in groups, students will build a working model of a raptor leg and then bring it to life while competing in a relay race that simulates the hunting techniques of these carnivorous animals. AUDIENCE: Grades 3–6 CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS: Grade 3 Science: Building with a Variety of Materials Grade 3–6 Math: Patterns and Relations Grade 4 Science: Building Devices and Vehicles that Move Grade 6 Science: Evidence and Investigation PROGRAM ObJECTIVES: 1. Students will understand the adaptations that contributed to the success of small theropods. 2. Students will explore the function of the muscles used in vertebrate movement and the mechanics of how a raptor leg works. 3. Students will understand the function of the raptorial claw. 4. Students will discover connections between small theropod dinosaurs and birds. SUGGESTED PRE-VISIT ACTIVITIES UNDERstANDING CLADIstICS Animals and plants are often referred to as part of a family or group. For example, the dog is part of the canine family (along with wolves, coyotes, foxes, etc.). Scientists group living things together based on relationships to gain insight into where they came from. This helps us identify common ancestors of different organisms. This method of grouping is called “cladistics.” Cladistics is a system that uses branches like a family tree to show how organisms are related to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithomimids from the Nemegt Formation of Mongolia
    J. Paleont. Soc. Korea. Vol. 22, No. 1, (2006) : p. 195-207 ORNITHOMIMIDS FROM THE NEMEGT FORMATION OF MONGOLIA Yoshitsugu Kobayashi1 and Rinchen Barsbold2 1Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810 Japan, [email protected] 2Paleontological Center of Mongolian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 260, Ulaan Bataar 210351, Mongolia, [email protected] Abstract: Two ornithomimids (Gallimimus bullatus and Anserimimus planinychus) and an enigmatic ornithomi- mid (Deinocheirus mirificus) from the Nemegt Formation (Maastrichtian) of Mongolia are reviewed in this study. Gallimimus bullatus is one of the best-known ornithomimids, but its diagnoses need to be revised. The length ratio of the manus/humerus in Gallimimus bullatusis 0.61. This is the smallest value in ornithomimosaurs (approximately 0.8 or more in other ornithomimosaurs) and may be a good character to diagnose Gallimimus bullatus as suggested by previous studies. Anserimimus planinychus is a unique ornithomimosaur in having strong deltopectoral crest of the humerus, dorsoventrally flat and nearly straight manual unguals, and long forelimbs. Anserimimus planinychus shares two characters (position of the biceps tubercle and alignment of the glenoid) with Gallimimus bullatus and has a long metacarpal I as in Ornithomimus edmontonicus (derived ornithomimosaur) and a long metacarpal III as in Harpymimus okladnikovi (primitive ornithomimosaur). The phylogenetic position of Deinocheirus mirificus has been problematic since its discovery. Preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Herbivorous Ecomorphology and Specialization Patterns in Theropod Dinosaur Evolution
    Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution Lindsay E. Zanno1 and Peter J. Makovicky Department of Geology, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 Edited by Randall Irmis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and accepted by the Editorial Board November 10, 2010 (received for review August 16, 2010) Interpreting key ecological parameters, such as diet, of extinct characteristics have been used to propose a myriad of dietary organisms without the benefit of direct observation or explicit preferences with little consensus (8, 11, 15–20). fossil evidence poses a formidable challenge for paleobiological Recently, a burst of theropod dinosaur discoveries bearing an studies. To date, dietary categorizations of extinct taxa are largely unexpected degree of ecomorphological disparity (particularly generated by means of modern analogs; however, for many with respect to dental anatomy) (12, 20–24) has sparked species the method is subject to considerable ambiguity. Here a renewed interest in the diet of coelurosaurian species. Yet, to we present a refined approach for assessing trophic habits in fossil date, a large scale quantitative analysis on theropod ecomor- taxa and apply the method to coelurosaurian dinosaurs—a clade phology has not been conducted. Serendipitously, an increasing for which diet is particularly controversial. Our findings detect 21 number of theropod specimens preserve unequivocal evidence of morphological features that exhibit statistically significant corre- diet in the form of fossilized gut contents (25–27), coprolites lations with extrinsic fossil evidence of coelurosaurian herbivory, (28), or a gastric mill (21–23, 29–31), which are known to cor- such as stomach contents and a gastric mill.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of the Dinosauria Davide Pisani1,2*, Adam M
    Received 24 September 2001 Accepted 3 December 2001 Published online 9 April 2002 A genus-level supertree of the Dinosauria Davide Pisani1,2*, Adam M. Yates1, Max C. Langer1 and Michael J. Benton1 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK One of the ultimate aims of systematics is the reconstruction of the tree of life. This is a huge undertaking that is inhibited by the existence of a computational limit to the inclusiveness of phylogenetic analyses. Supertree methods have been developed to overcome, or at least to go around this problem by combining smaller, partially overlapping cladograms. Here, we present a very inclusive generic-level supertree of Dinosauria (covering a total of 277 genera), which is remarkably well resolved and provides some clarity in many contentious areas of dinosaur systematics. Keywords: supertrees; phylogeny; dinosaurs; fossil; Mesozoic 1. INTRODUCTION tations of the information conveyed by the trees in the input set. In the last few decades, advances in theoretical system- The original MRP method of Baum (1992) and Ragan atics, as well as in computer sciences, have provided bio- (1992), referred to as component coding-MRP (CC- logists and palaeontologists with tools to investigate the MRP) in this paper, was used to combine 126 `partial phy- phylogenetic relationships among organisms, yet phylo- logenies’ of dinosaurs (covering a total of 277 genera) with genetic inference is computationally expensive and analy- the aim of obtaining a single, genus-level supertree. CC- ses of large datasets hardly feasible (Graham & Foulds MRP makes use of the fact that a tree can be represented 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position of Ornithomimosauria in Coelurosauria with Comments on the Relationship of Ornithomimosaurs and Alvarezsaurids
    ｖｅｒ／化石研究会会誌 ＰＤＦ化／０８０８００７９ 化石研究会誌４１巻１号／本文／５ ２５‐３２ 欧文 2008.09.24 09. 化石研究会会誌 Journal of Fossil Research, Vol.４１（１）,２５-３２（２００８） ［Original report］ Phylogenetic position of Ornithomimosauria in Coelurosauria with comments on the relationship of ornithomimosaurs and alvarezsaurids KOBAYASHI, Yoshitsugu* Abstract The phylogenetic position of Ornithomimosauria within Coerulosauria is discussed. Most of previous phylogenetic analyses suggested that Ornithomimosauria is basal coelurosaur dinosaurs (Tyrannosauridae is the most basal taxon). One study suggested that ornithomimosaurs and alvarezsaurids form a monophyly. This study argues an ornithomimosaurs-alvarezsaurids relationship and supports the idea that they are probably not closely related. Additional information from this study are that two characters for the ornithomimosaur-alvarezsaurid monophyly from the previous study (metacarpals I-III extent of shaft-to-shaft contact 60-70% of shafts and metacarpal I length at least 60% that of metacarapal II) are not supported (roughly 20% contact between metacarpals II and III, less than 50% shaft-to shaft contact in metacarpals I and II in some taxa, and metacarpal I in Harpymimus rougly 50% of metacarpal II). A phylogenetic analysis in this study suggests that the features, supporting a close relationship between ornithomimsoaurs and alvarezsaurids in the previous study are from derived ornithomimids, not primitive forms. Key words： Dinosauria, Coelurosauria, Ornithomimosauria, Alvarezsauridae, phylogeny Introduction ornithomimosaur genera were placed in the Ornithomimosauria are a group of theropod families Harpymimidae (includes Harpymimus) dinosaurs, each of which resembles modern ground and Garudimimidae (includes Garudimimus) (Barsbold, birds in having a beak-like jaw and lightly built body 1981 ; Barsbold and Perle, 1984) from Mongolia with long, slender limbs (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Strength Indicator Values of Theropod Long Bones, with Comments on Limb Proportions and Cursorial Potential
    GAIA N' 15, LlSBONLISBON, DEZEMBROIDECEMBER 1998, pp. 241-255 (ISSN: 0871-5424) STRENGTH INDICATOR VALUES OF THEROPOD LONG BONES, WITH COMMENTS ON LIMB PROPORTIONS AND CURSORIAL POTENTIAL Per CHRISTIANSEN Zoological Museum, Department of Vertebrates. Universitetsparken 15, OK 2100 COPEN HAG EM 0. DENMARK E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Body mass and strength indicator values of the three hindlimb long bones have been calculated for a large number oftheropod dinosaurs and compared to extant mammals of varying size and locomotory capability_Small to medium sized theropods have strength indicator values comparable to fast-moving ungulates and carnivorans, whereas all large genera have considerably lower strength indicator values, roughly comparable to elephants and hippopotamuses. This suggests that their locomotory potential was reduced compared to the smaller forms. Limb bone ratios of a large number of extant mammals clearly differen­ tiate fast-moving forms, classified from their anatomy as subcursorial or cursorial, from forms capable of less rapid locomotion, classified as graviportal and mediportal. Limb bone ratios for theropods, however, somewhat contradict the above, as all theropods group among subcursorial mammals_ Calculations on estimated peak locomotory performance in­ dicates that even large theropods could have been fast moving without having to include a suspended phase in the stride, thus not subjecting their appendicular anatomy to large amounts of stress, due to their very long limbs. INTRODUCTION However, COOMBS (1978) analyzed a long list of anatomical characters in various tetrapods and Theropod dinosaurs were the only undoubtedly found that a number of these had probably de­ carnivorous terrestrial tetrapods for most of the veloped convergently and were found in all forms ca­ Mesozoic that, at least theoretically, were large and pable of fast locomotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Unenlagiid Theropods: Are They Members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)?
    “main” — 2011/2/10 — 14:01 — page 117 — #1 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2011) 83(1): 117-162 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Unenlagiid theropods: are they members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)? , FEDERICO L. AGNOLIN1 2 and FERNANDO E. NOVAS1 1Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Ángel Gallardo, 470 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropología CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides, Valentín Virasoro 732 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina Manuscript received on November 9, 2009; accepted for publication on June 21, 2010 ABSTRACT In the present paper we analyze the phylogenetic position of the derived Gondwanan theropod clade Unen- lagiidae. Although this group has been frequently considered as deeply nested within Deinonychosauria and Dromaeosauridae, most of the features supporting this interpretation are conflictive, at least. Modification of integrative databases, such as that recently published by Hu et al. (2009), produces significant changes in the topological distribution of taxa within Deinonychosauria, depicting unenlagiids outside this clade. Our analysis retrieves, in contrast, a monophyletic Avialae formed by Unenlagiidae plus Aves. Key words: Gondwana, Deinonychosauria, Dromaeosauridae, Unenlagiidae, Avialae. INTRODUCTION Until recently, the deinonychosaurian fossil record has been geographically restricted to the Northern Hemisphere (Norell and Makovicky 2004), but recent discoveries demonstrated that they were also present and highly diversified in the Southern landmasses, suggesting that an important adaptive radiation took place in Gondwana during the Cretaceous. Gondwanan dromaeosaurids have been documented from Turonian through Maastrichtian beds of Argentina (Makovicky et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Dinosaurs Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    MEET THE DINOSAURS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK DK | 32 pages | 18 Jun 2012 | DK Publishing (Dorling Kindersley) | 9780756692933 | English | New York, United States Meet the Dinosaurs PDF Book Crocodilians are the only surviving example in which those changes did not occur; birds are the only surviving group in which they did occur. The tetanurans appeared in the Middle Jurassic, diversified in the Late Jurassic, and were the main northern-hemisphere predators until the Late Cretaceous. Dinosaurs lived for about million years, and during that time, the continents gradually spread to form the shapes we recognize today. Only the hundred or so dinosaurs for which good remains are known can be studied for relationships. Their skeletons were birdlike. The first toe was smaller than the others; the fifth toe was only a splint. Chordates and corals are members of the kingdom Animalia animals. They had small heads and they usually had no teeth. Why Did the T. By using ThoughtCo, you accept our. They still had 12 neck vertebrae and the front limbs were slightly shorter than the back limbs. For example, all dinosaurs had cheek muscles that extended from their jaws to the tops of their skulls. This gave the body a backward slope from the neck to the tail. Small to medium-sized carnivores like Podokesaurus soon made their way to eastern North America, then onward to Africa and Eurasia a latter example being the western European Liliensternus. But all lambeosaurines in which the skulls are well known Hypacrosaurus, Corythosaurus, Lambeosaurus, and Parasaurolophus had hollow crests with looping nasal passages that may have been used to make sounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur-Biodiversity-Reduc
    Dinosaur Diversity Changes • During the Mesozoic era, dinosaurs dominated the Top levels of the Food Chain Pyramid • Their ecological territory or “Niche” spread out over many environmental conditions; coastal, fluvial and even desert, almost everywhere on the earth’s surface • Even the sea and air were occupied by closely related reptiles (e.g. Plesiosaurus, Ichthyosaurus, Pteranodon) • Mammals hide from them, so their niches were nocturnal Dinosaur diversity change is important to elucidate future predictions of present-day animal biodiversity. Dinosaur Diversity Changes • During Mesozoic era, dinosaurs dominated the Top levels of the Food Chain Pyramid. • Their ecological territory “Niche” spread out over many environmental conditions; coastal, fluvial and even desert, almost everywhere on the earth’s surface. • Even sea and air occupied by closely related reptiles (e.g. Plesiosaurus, Ichthyosaurus, Pteranodon). • Mammals hide from them, so their niches were nocternal Dinosaur diversity change is important to elucidate future predictions of present-day animal biodiversity. Dinosaur Paleontology Dinosaurs originated in South America • Argentinosaurus is the heaviest dinosaur (length: 30m, weight: 100 tons). • Cretaceous Dinosaur assemblages are different from N. Hemisphere. South America “Sauropoda” North America & Asia “Hadrosaurid” No.1 Dinosaur Kingdom • A large variety of dinosaur fossils • Jurassic dinosaur assemblage is similar to other continents • Diversity of Ceratopsian and Hadrosauridae in late Cretaceous Motherland of Dinosaur Research • Iguanodon is the first Dinosaur specimen and species described . No.2 Dinosaur Kingdom • Recently, Bird-related Dinosaur fossils found. Hatching Oviraptor • Australia was located in polar zone in the early Cretaceous • But there were some dinosaurs (e.g. Muttaburasaurus). New Field of Dinosaur Research • Some dinosaur assemblages are similar to N.&S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Theropod Phylogeny
    Archosaur Phylogeny Mark Norell, George Barrowclough, Joel Cracraft (AMNH), Peter Makovicky (TFM), Brad Livezey (CMNH), James Clark (GWU), John Gatesy (UCR), Chris Brochu (UI) Saurischian diversity All evidence agrees that crocodiles are the closest living relatives of birds. ~10000 species Saurischia Ornithischia a ir Dinosauria C d r ho ur it ~30 species ot n ar r si O Archosauria The Problem…. • Although it has been firmly established that birds are ingroup dinosaurs there have been no detailed phylogenetic treatments of the complete group at fine taxonomic levels. • No large combined analysis of molecular and morphological characters has been undertaken • Our experience working on coelurosaurian phylogeny has taught us that character placement is greatly affected by taxon sampling regimes • Fine-grained taxonomic sampling is key for a clear understanding of macroevolutionary events, such as avian origins and the evolution of associated key morphological and behavioral character systems. 4 winWgehde-rder wome aaeroe saatur Fossilized behavior Goals • Combine all relevant morphological characters into a single large matrix • Examine an extensive series of archosaur taxa • Code taxa at the specimen level • Sequence an extensive series of Neoaves and Crocodylia • Develop a Supermatrix database to store all relevant character and specimen data The Supermatrix • A virtual archive of information • Includes both text and images • Web accessible • Platform independent • Strict version control • Entries can be combined into composites • Data
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Unenlagiid Theropods: Are They Members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)?
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências ISSN: 0001-3765 [email protected] Academia Brasileira de Ciências Brasil AGNOLIN, FEDERICO L.; NOVAS, FERNANDO E. Unenlagiid theropods: are they members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)? Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 83, núm. 1, marzo, 2011, pp. 117-162 Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32717681007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative “main” — 2011/2/10 — 14:01 — page 117 — #1 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2011) 83(1): 117-162 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Unenlagiid theropods: are they members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)? , FEDERICO L. AGNOLIN1 2 and FERNANDO E. NOVAS1 1Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Ángel Gallardo, 470 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropología CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides, Valentín Virasoro 732 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina Manuscript received on November 9, 2009; accepted for publication on June 21, 2010 ABSTRACT In the present paper we analyze the phylogenetic position of the derived Gondwanan theropod clade Unen- lagiidae. Although this group has been frequently considered as deeply nested within Deinonychosauria and Dromaeosauridae, most of the features supporting this interpretation are conflictive, at least.
    [Show full text]