DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced Theropod Phylogeny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced Theropod Phylogeny Archosaur Phylogeny Mark Norell, George Barrowclough, Joel Cracraft (AMNH), Peter Makovicky (TFM), Brad Livezey (CMNH), James Clark (GWU), John Gatesy (UCR), Chris Brochu (UI) Saurischian diversity All evidence agrees that crocodiles are the closest living relatives of birds. ~10000 species Saurischia Ornithischia a ir Dinosauria C d r ho ur it ~30 species ot n ar r si O Archosauria The Problem…. • Although it has been firmly established that birds are ingroup dinosaurs there have been no detailed phylogenetic treatments of the complete group at fine taxonomic levels. • No large combined analysis of molecular and morphological characters has been undertaken • Our experience working on coelurosaurian phylogeny has taught us that character placement is greatly affected by taxon sampling regimes • Fine-grained taxonomic sampling is key for a clear understanding of macroevolutionary events, such as avian origins and the evolution of associated key morphological and behavioral character systems. 4 winWgehde-rder wome aaeroe saatur Fossilized behavior Goals • Combine all relevant morphological characters into a single large matrix • Examine an extensive series of archosaur taxa • Code taxa at the specimen level • Sequence an extensive series of Neoaves and Crocodylia • Develop a Supermatrix database to store all relevant character and specimen data The Supermatrix • A virtual archive of information • Includes both text and images • Web accessible • Platform independent • Strict version control • Entries can be combined into composites • Data can be output into formats for phylogenetic analysis Progress Supermatrix model developed and site under construction Hundreds of saurischian specimens have been scored & photographed A master list of morphological characters is compiled and being updated Ongoing development and expansion of analyses for sub-clades 0 Lagerpeton chanarensis Marasuchus lilloensis 50 1 Saurischia 2 Pseudolagosuchus major 51 6 Pisanosaurus mertii 53 7 Heterodontosaurus tucki 52 55 8 Lesothosaurus diagnosticus 10 Eoraptor lunensis 54 11 Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis 56 Dinosauria 12 Coelophysis bauri 58 13 Liliensternus liliensterni 57 14 Elaphrosaurus bambergi Saurischia 15 Saturnalia tupiniquim 16 Thecodontosaurus caducus 60 59 17 Thecodontosaurus antiquus Sauropodomorpha Efraasi inor 61 18 a m 21 Ruehleai bedheimensis 64 19 Plateosaurus engelhardti 62 63 20 Plateosaurus gracilis 29 'Kholumolumosaurus ellenbergerorum' 65 72 30 Riojasaurus incertus 24 Massospondylus carinatus 69 67 22 Coloradisaurus brevis 25 Lufengosaurus huenei 66 26 Gyposaurus sinensis 68 27 Yunnanosaurus huangi 23 Mussaurus patagonicus 28 Anchisaurus polyzelus 70 31 Jinshanosaurus xinwaensis 71 33 Melanorosaurus readi 34 Antetonitrus ingenipes 73 35 Lessemsaurus sauropoides 74 36 Blikanasaurus cromptoni 37 Vulcanodon karibaensis 75 38 Kotasaurus yamanpalliensi 76 41 Shunosaurus lii Eusauropoda 81 44 Volkheimeria chubutiensis 80 43 Lappare ntosaurus madagasc 79 40 Barapasaurus tagorei 78 39 Isanosaurus attavipachi 77 42 Omeisaurus maoianus 45 ata osa ru ari s 82 P g u s f a i 47 Diplodocus carnegii 83 48 Camarasaurus lentus 84 Neosauropoda 49 Brachiosaurus brancai Allosaurus Sinosauropteryx Tyrannosaurus Tyrannosaurs Albertosaurus Struthiomimus Ornithomimus Anserimimus Ornithomi- Archaeornithomimus Gallimimus Garudimimus mosaurs Harpymimus Shenzhousaurus } Pelecanimimus Ornitholestes Mononykus Shuuvuia Patagonykus Alvarezsaur Alvarezsaurus } Ingenia Oviraptor Citipati Oviraptor Conchoraptor Chirostenotes Oviraptorosaurs Avimimus Microvenator Caudipteryx } Beipaosaurus Segnosaurus Erlikosaurus Alxasaurus Dromaeosaurus Deinonychus Velociraptor Unenlagia Utahraptor Saurornitholestes Dromaeosaurs Achillobator Adasaurus Ukhaa dromaosaur } Sinornithosaurus Microraptor Sinovenator EK Troodontid Troodon Saurornithoides Saurornithoides Troodontids Byronosaurus Sinornithoides Rahonavis } Theropod Working Group Archeopteryx Confuciusornis Aves http://research.amnh.org/users/ } norell/TWGhome.html = Liaoning taxon NEOAVIAN PHYLOGENY Mayr & Clarke, 2003 Modern Bird Phylogenetics: Scope of the Molecular Data Follow a liberal interpretation of generic limits: ~2450 extant genera to be sampled (expect 82%, or 2112, to be represented by tissues S & A had 760 genera in their "Tapestry." We expect 2.6X coverage in this study. Sequencing partitioned equally between Cracraft, Barrowclough, and Baker labs Furnariidae Dendrocolaptidae Formicariidae Rhinocryptidae Thamnophilidae Conopophagidae Phylogeny of the Furnariidae Furnarii (suboscines) 135 of 148 genera represented many new insights into generic relationships Dendrocolaptidae Formicariidae Rhynocryptidae Thamnophilidae new biogeographic insights into origins of South American avifauna 16 Fringillidae (6) Motacilla Passer Ploceus 23 Prunella Irenidae (2) Nectariniinae (2) Arcanator 22 Modulatrix Promerops Turdinae (2) Muscicapa Cinclus 24 Mimus 15 Sturnus Bombycillidae (2) Regulus (2) Certhia 13 Sitta 21 Polioptila Troglodytes Zosterops Garrulax Sylvia Cisticola Pycnonotus 9 Aegithalos Hirundo (2) 25 Alauda 12 Culicicapa 8 Elminia Parus (2) Remiz Petroicidae (6) Picathartidae (2) 17 Corvus (3) Cyanocitta Corvinella Lanius Monarcha (2) Grallina Melampitta (2) Corcorax Struthidea Manucodia (2) Paradisaea Ptiloris Chaetorhynchus Rhipidura Dicrurus (2) Aegithina Dryoscopus Telophorus Batis 11 Prionops Vanga Artamus Cracticus Gymnorhina Strepera Oreoica Pitohui Oriolus (2) Sphecotheres Paramythia Colluricincla Pachycephala (2) Falcunculus 10 Ptilorrhoa Coracina (2) Lalage 20 Pericrocotus 14 Vireonidae (2) Erpornis Daphoenositta Oscines 18 Cnemophilus Loboparadisaea 19 Philesturnus Callaeatidae Melanocharitidae (4) Orthonychidae (2) Pomatostomidae (2) Ephthianura Meliphaga Pardalotus (2) Meliphagoidea Malurus 7 Ailuroedus Ptilonorhynchus Climacteris Cormobates Climacteridae Menura Menuridae Campylorhamphus Furnarius 6 Formicarius Scytalopus Conopophaga 5 Thamnophilus Mionectes New World Tyrannus Pipra 1 Rupicola 2 Schiffornis Tityra "Suboscines" Neodrepanis 4 Philepitta Psarisomus Old World 3 Smithornis Pitta AcanthisittaÑAcanthisittidae Coracias Gallus Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation F. K. Barker, A. Cibois, P. Schikler, J. Feinstein, and J. Cracraft. 2004. PNAS 101:11040-11045 All "families" except 1 (Hypocoliidae, endemic to Iran and Iraq!) RAG-1 and RAG-2 nuclear genes (4129 bp) The passerines (passeriforms) arose in Australasian part of Gondwana prior to KT Significant incongruence with DNA hybridization "Tapestry" (e.g., Australasian "Corvida" massively paraphyletic) Phodilus Tyto Ninox Athene Aegolius Otus OW Strix Ciccaba Otus NW Otus Af r. Asio Strigiformes Bubo RAG-1 Ketupa Nyctea Phylogeny of the Owls Barn owls are sister to strigines as expected Australasian Ninox is sister to all other strigines 25 of 31 genera Otus is polyphyletic and represented now the separate clades make more sense biogeographically What remains to be done…. • Visit more collections and sequence/score more taxa • Annealing of subclade matrices to create Supermatrix • Upload information onto Supermatrix website • Development of user-friendly interface to facilitate broad use. • Large-scale simultaneous analysis of all the data.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Braincase, Brain and Palaeobiology of the Basal Sauropodomorph Dinosaur Thecodontosaurus Antiquus
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, XX, 1–22. With 10 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa157/6032720 by University of Bristol Library user on 14 December 2020 The braincase, brain and palaeobiology of the basal sauropodomorph dinosaur Thecodontosaurus antiquus ANTONIO BALLELL1,*, J. LOGAN KING1, JAMES M. NEENAN2, EMILY J. RAYFIELD1 and MICHAEL J. BENTON1 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK Received 27 May 2020; revised 15 October 2020; accepted for publication 26 October 2020 Sauropodomorph dinosaurs underwent drastic changes in their anatomy and ecology throughout their evolution. The Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus antiquus occupies a basal position within Sauropodomorpha, being a key taxon for documenting how those morphofunctional transitions occurred. Here, we redescribe the braincase osteology and reconstruct the neuroanatomy of Thecodontosaurus, based on computed tomography data. The braincase of Thecodontosaurus shares the presence of medial basioccipital components of the basal tubera and a U-shaped basioccipital–parabasisphenoid suture with other basal sauropodomorphs and shows a distinct combination of characters: a straight outline of the braincase floor, an undivided metotic foramen, an unossified gap, large floccular fossae, basipterygoid processes perpendicular to the cultriform process in lateral view and a rhomboid foramen magnum. We reinterpret these braincase features in the light of new discoveries in dinosaur anatomy. Our endocranial reconstruction reveals important aspects of the palaeobiology of Thecodontosaurus, supporting a bipedal stance and cursorial habits, with adaptations to retain a steady head and gaze while moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Continental Late Triassic Tetrapod Biochronology. I. the Type Locality of Saturnalia Tupiniquim and the Faunal Succession in South Brazil
    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 19 (2005) 205–218 www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames Studies on continental Late Triassic tetrapod biochronology. I. The type locality of Saturnalia tupiniquim and the faunal succession in south Brazil Max Cardoso Langer* Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeira˜o Preto, SP, Brazil Received 1 November 2003; accepted 1 January 2005 Abstract Late Triassic deposits of the Parana´ Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, encompass a single third-order, tetrapod-bearing sedimentary sequence that includes parts of the Alemoa Member (Santa Maria Formation) and the Caturrita Formation. A rich, diverse succession of terrestrial tetrapod communities is recorded in these sediments, which can be divided into at least three faunal associations. The stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim was collected in the locality known as ‘Waldsanga’ near the city of Santa Maria. In that area, the deposits of the Alemoa Member yield the ‘Alemoa local fauna,’ which typifies the first association; includes the rhynchosaur Hyperodapedon, aetosaurs, and basal dinosaurs; and is coeval with the lower fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation, Bermejo Basin, NW Argentina. The second association is recorded in deposits of both the Alemoa Member and the Caturrita Formation, characterized by the rhynchosaur ‘Scaphonyx’ sulcognathus and the cynodont Exaeretodon, and correlated with the upper fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation. Various isolated outcrops of the Caturrita Formation yield tetrapod fossils that correspond to post-Ischigualastian faunas but might not belong to a single faunal association. The record of the dicynodont Jachaleria suggests correlations with the lower part of the Los Colorados Formation, NW Argentina, whereas remains of derived tritheledontid cynodonts indicate younger ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Second Edition
    MASS ESTIMATES - DINOSAURS ETC (largely based on models) taxon k model femur length* model volume ml x specific gravity = model mass g specimen (modeled 1st):kilograms:femur(or other long bone length)usually in decameters kg = femur(or other long bone)length(usually in decameters)3 x k k = model volume in ml x specific gravity(usually for whole model) then divided/model femur(or other long bone)length3 (in most models femur in decameters is 0.5253 = 0.145) In sauropods the neck is assigned a distinct specific gravity; in dinosaurs with large feathers their mass is added separately; in dinosaurs with flight ablity the mass of the fight muscles is calculated separately as a range of possiblities SAUROPODS k femur trunk neck tail total neck x 0.6 rest x0.9 & legs & head super titanosaur femur:~55000-60000:~25:00 Argentinosaurus ~4 PVPH-1:~55000:~24.00 Futalognkosaurus ~3.5-4 MUCPv-323:~25000:19.80 (note:downsize correction since 2nd edition) Dreadnoughtus ~3.8 “ ~520 ~75 50 ~645 0.45+.513=.558 MPM-PV 1156:~26000:19.10 Giraffatitan 3.45 .525 480 75 25 580 .045+.455=.500 HMN MB.R.2181:31500(neck 2800):~20.90 “XV2”:~45000:~23.50 Brachiosaurus ~4.15 " ~590 ~75 ~25 ~700 " +.554=~.600 FMNH P25107:~35000:20.30 Europasaurus ~3.2 “ ~465 ~39 ~23 ~527 .023+.440=~.463 composite:~760:~6.20 Camarasaurus 4.0 " 542 51 55 648 .041+.537=.578 CMNH 11393:14200(neck 1000):15.25 AMNH 5761:~23000:18.00 juv 3.5 " 486 40 55 581 .024+.487=.511 CMNH 11338:640:5.67 Chuanjiesaurus ~4.1 “ ~550 ~105 ~38 ~693 .063+.530=.593 Lfch 1001:~10700:13.75 2 M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Dinosaurian Physiology Inherited by Birds? Reconciling Slow Growth in Archaeopteryx
    Was Dinosaurian Physiology Inherited by Birds? Reconciling Slow Growth in Archaeopteryx Gregory M. Erickson1,6*, Oliver W. M. Rauhut2, Zhonghe Zhou3, Alan H. Turner4,6, Brian D. Inouye1, Dongyu Hu5, Mark A. Norell6 1 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America, 2 Bayerische Staatssammlung fu¨r Pala¨ontologie und Geologie and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, LMU Munich, Mu¨nchen, Germany, 3 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China, 4 Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America, 5 Paleontological Institute, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China, 6 Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America Abstract Background: Archaeopteryx is the oldest and most primitive known bird (Avialae). It is believed that the growth and energetic physiology of basalmost birds such as Archaeopteryx were inherited in their entirety from non-avialan dinosaurs. This hypothesis predicts that the long bones in these birds formed using rapidly growing, well-vascularized woven tissue typical of non-avialan dinosaurs. Methodology/Principal Findings: We report that Archaeopteryx long bones are composed of nearly avascular parallel- fibered bone. This is among the slowest growing osseous tissues and is common in ectothermic reptiles. These findings dispute the hypothesis that non-avialan dinosaur growth and physiology were inherited in totality by the first birds. Examining these findings in a phylogenetic context required intensive sampling of outgroup dinosaurs and basalmost birds. Our results demonstrate the presence of a scale-dependent maniraptoran histological continuum that Archaeopteryx and other basalmost birds follow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauropodomorph Biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of Southern Africa: Tracking the Evolution of Sauropodomorpha Across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary
    Editors' choice The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary BLAIR W. MCPHEE, EMESE M. BORDY, LARA SCISCIO, and JONAH N. CHOINIERE McPhee, B.W., Bordy, E.M., Sciscio, L., and Choiniere, J.N. 2017. The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 441–465. The latest Triassic is notable for coinciding with the dramatic decline of many previously dominant groups, followed by the rapid radiation of Dinosauria in the Early Jurassic. Among the most common terrestrial vertebrates from this time, sauropodomorph dinosaurs provide an important insight into the changing dynamics of the biota across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. The Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho preserves the richest assemblage of sauropodomorphs known from this age, and is a key index assemblage for biostratigraphic correlations with other simi- larly-aged global terrestrial deposits. Past assessments of Elliot Formation biostratigraphy were hampered by an overly simplistic biozonation scheme which divided it into a lower “Euskelosaurus” Range Zone and an upper Massospondylus Range Zone. Here we revise the zonation of the Elliot Formation by: (i) synthesizing the last three decades’ worth of fossil discoveries, taxonomic revision, and lithostratigraphic investigation; and (ii) systematically reappraising the strati- graphic provenance of important fossil locations. We then use our revised stratigraphic information in conjunction with phylogenetic character data to assess morphological disparity between Late Triassic and Early Jurassic sauropodomorph taxa. Our results demonstrate that the Early Jurassic upper Elliot Formation is considerably more taxonomically and morphologically diverse than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria Rubén D. F. Martínez1*, Matthew C. Lamanna2, Fernando E. Novas3, Ryan C. Ridgely4, Gabriel A. Casal1, Javier E. Martínez5, Javier R. Vita6, Lawrence M. Witmer4 1 Laboratorio de Paleovertebrados, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina, 2 Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 3 Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America, 5 Hospital Regional de Comodoro Rivadavia, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina, 6 Resonancia Magnética Borelli, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Martínez RDF, Lamanna MC, Novas FE, Ridgely RC, Casal GA, Martínez JE, et al. (2016) A Basal Lithostrotian Titanosaur (Dinosauria: Abstract Sauropoda) with a Complete Skull: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of Titanosauria. PLoS We describe Sarmientosaurus musacchioi gen. et sp. nov., a titanosaurian sauropod dino- ONE 11(4): e0151661. doi:10.1371/journal. saur from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian—Turonian) Lower Member of the Bajo Bar- pone.0151661 real Formation of southern Chubut Province in
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in Later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: 2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous 3 Asiamerica 4 5 6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 7 8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA 9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft 12 13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 14 Department of Geology 15 8000 Regents Drive 16 University of Maryland 17 College Park, MD 20742 18 USA 19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084 20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661 21 Email address: [email protected] 22 23 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91 24 ABSTRACT 25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show 26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the 27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of Antetonitrus Ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): Implications for the Origins of Sauropoda
    THE ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF ANTETONITRUS INGENIPES (SAUROPODIFORMES, DINOSAURIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINS OF SAUROPODA Blair McPhee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2013 i ii ABSTRACT A thorough description and cladistic analysis of the Antetonitrus ingenipes type material sheds further light on the stepwise acquisition of sauropodan traits just prior to the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Although the forelimb of Antetonitrus and other closely related sauropododomorph taxa retains the plesiomorphic morphology typical of a mobile grasping structure, the changes in the weight-bearing dynamics of both the musculature and the architecture of the hindlimb document the progressive shift towards a sauropodan form of graviportal locomotion. Nonetheless, the presence of hypertrophied muscle attachment sites in Antetonitrus suggests the retention of an intermediary form of facultative bipedality. The term Sauropodiformes is adopted here and given a novel definition intended to capture those transitional sauropodomorph taxa occupying a contiguous position on the pectinate line towards Sauropoda. The early record of sauropod diversification and evolution is re- examined in light of the paraphyletic consensus that has emerged regarding the ‘Prosauropoda’ in recent years. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express sincere gratitude to Adam Yates for providing me with the opportunity to do ‘real’ palaeontology, and also for gladly sharing his considerable knowledge on sauropodomorph osteology and phylogenetics. This project would not have been possible without the continued (and continual) support (both emotionally and financially) of my parents, Alf and Glenda McPhee – Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Curriculum Vitae
    MARK ALLEN NORELL CURATOR, DIVISION CHAIR AND PROFESSOR DIVISION OF PALEONTOLOGY HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED Ph.D. AREA OF SPECIALIZATION Evolution of avian dinosaurs EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE Ph.D. in Biology, Yale University, 1988 M.Phil. Yale University, 1986 M.S. in Biology, San Diego State University, 1983 B.S. in Zoology, California State University, Long Beach, 1980 PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN DOCTORAL EDUCATION FACULTY APPOINTMENTS Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Yale University, 1995-1999 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Yale University, 1991-1995 Lecturer, Department of Biology, Yale University, 1989 COURSES TAUGHT Richard Gilder Graduate School, Grantsmanship, Ethics and Communication, 2008- present Guest Lecturer- EESC G9668y Seminar in vertebrate paleontology. Origin and evolution of the theropod pectoral girdle, 2007 EESC G9668y Seminar in vertebrate paleontology. A Total Evidence Approach to Lizard Phylogeny, 2006 Columbia University directed research, 2000 Columbia University, Dinosaur Biology, 4 lectures, 1996 Yale University, Evolutionary Biology, 6 lectures, 1995 CUNY, Paleobiological methods, 2 lectures, 1994 GRADUATE ADVISEES Sheana Montanari, Richard Gilder Graduate School, 2008-present Stephen Brusatte, Columbia Universiety, 2008-present Amy Balanoff, Columbia University, 2005- present Alan Turner, Columbia University, Ph.D. candidate, 2004-present Sterling Nesbitt, Columbia University, Ph.D. candidate, 2004-present Daniel Ksepka, Columbia University, Ph.D. candidate, 2002- present Sunny
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full-Text
    Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 6:60-67 60 ISSN 2292-1389 Positional Variation in Pedal Unguals of North American Ornithomimids (Dinosauria, Theropoda): A Response to Brownstein (2017) Bradley McFeeters1*, Michael J. Ryan1,2, and Thomas M. Cullen3 1Dept. Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada; [email protected] 2Cleveland Museum of Natural History, 1 Wade Oval Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 41106-1767, USA; [email protected] 3Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA; thomas.cullen@ fieldmuseum.org Abstract: Positional variation is documented in ornithomimid pedal unguals from the Dinosaur Park and Horseshoe Canyon Formations of Alberta, Canada, and characters for identifying the position of isolated ornithomimid pedal unguals are discussed. Ungual morphology has been used recently to argue for the coexistence of two distinct ornithomimosaurs, a basal taxon and distinctly more derived taxon, in the Early Cretaceous Arundel Clay of Maryland, USA. However, these conclusions are based on misconceptions of the morphology and positional variability of ornithomimosaur unguals. Some characters previously cited as diagnostic of ornithomimosaur unguals are not actually observed in this clade, or are more homoplastically distributed among theropods. Other characters proposed to distinguish between the two pedal ungual morphs in the Arundel Clay material are shown in the Albertan ornithomimid material to consistently distinguish the dif- ferent ungual positions within the pes of one individual. Claims of multiple distinct ornithomimosaur taxa in the Arundel Clay are premature, as the two pedal ungual morphotypes more likely represent positional variation in a single taxon. INTRODUCTION itional variation in a complete set of unguals from a single pes of the ornithomimid Aepyornithomimus tugrikinensis The ornithomimosaur pes is regarded as an important was described and figured.
    [Show full text]