Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1
Manuscript Type: Article
Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author:
Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae
Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? :
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis:
2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous
3 Asiamerica
4
5
6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
7
8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA
9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA
10 Email address: [email protected]
11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft
12
13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
14 Department of Geology
15 8000 Regents Drive
16 University of Maryland
17 College Park, MD 20742
18 USA
19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084
20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661
21 Email address: [email protected]
22
23
1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91
24 ABSTRACT
25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show
26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the
27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia. The large
28 carnivore guilds in Asiamerican assemblages are monopolized by tyrannosaurids, with adult
29 medium-sized (50-500 kg) predators rare or absent. In contrast, various clades of theropods are
30 found to occupy these body sizes in earlier faunas, including early tyrannosauroids. Assemblages
31 with “missing middle sized” predators are not found to have correspondingly sparser diversity of
32 potential prey species recorded in these same faunas. The “missing middle sized” niches in the
33 theropod guilds of Late Cretaceous Laramidia and Asia may have been assimilated by juvenile
34 and subadults of tyrannosaurid species, Draftfunctionally distinct from their adult ecomorphologies. It
35 is speculated that if tyrannosaurids assimilated the niches previously occupied by mid-sized
36 theropod predators that we would expect the evolution of distinct transitions in morphology and
37 possibly the delay of the achievement of somatic maturity in species of this taxon.
38
39 Keywords: dinosaurs, ontogeny, theropod, paleoecology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
2 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 3 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
47
48 INTRODUCTION
49 Dale Russell’s (1970) review of the Tyrannosauridae of the Late Cretaceous Western Canada
50 represents one of the most significant contributions to the study of the tyrant dinosaur in the mid-
51 20th Century. As well as introducing the species Daspletosaurus torosus and summarizing what
52 was then the most extensive collections of North American tyrannosaurids, Russell also
53 speculated on the anatomy and proportions of a hypothetical hatchling albertosaurine (Fig. 1),
54 extrapolated from observed allometric changes in subadult and adult specimens. This
55 hypothetical reconstruction emphasized that the early ontogenetic stages of an animal which
56 undergoes very large increases in size might have strikingly different functional morphology and
57 ecological roles than the adult of the sameDraft species.
58
59 The scale of ontogenetic morphological transformation in Tyrannosauridae was first explored by
60 Rozhdestvesnky (1965). He observed that several specimens initially regarded as separate
61 species (Gorgosaurus novojilovi, Gorgosaurus lancinator, Tarbosaurus efremovi, and
62 Tyrannosaurus bataar) represented a single taxon, for which the proper name was Tarbosaurus
63 bataar. Morphological distinctions beyond body size, such as changes in hindlimb proportion
64 and a shift from relatively ziphodont (blade-like) maxillary and dentary teeth in the smaller
65 “species” versus incrassate (inflated) teeth in the adult, had led previous authors to consider as
66 separate taxa what were in fact a continuous growth series. Subsequently similar changes were
67 observed in other Asian and North American tyrannosaurids, with recognition that some
68 previously proposed species were parts of ontogenetic sequences (Carr 1999, 2020; Currie 2003;
69 Carr and Williamson 2004).
3 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 4 of 91
70
71 Given these anatomical transitions at different age classes, the question of the possibility of
72 substantial shifts in functional anatomy and ecology through ontogeny in tyrannosaurids has
73 been speculated upon by a number of authors (Holtz 2004a, 2004b; Snively et al. 2006; Bates
74 and Falkingham 2012; Woodward et al. 2020; Carr 2020). Indeed, an ontogenetic niche shift
75 would be unavoidable in an animal that underwent a multiple order of magnitude increase in size
76 from hatching to adulthood (Taylor 1979; Auffenberg 1981; Tucker et al. 1996; Purwanda et al.
77 2016), barring provisioning by an adult throughout the entire growth series or membership in a
78 gregarious social group responsible for all food acquisition (but see Currie and Eberth (2010) for
79 the possibility for gregariousness in the Early Maastrichtian tyrannosaurid Albertosaurus
80 sarcophagus.) Draft
81
82 How might these ontogenetic niche shifts be reflected in the structure of the communities of
83 carnivorous dinosaurs, and do communities in which tyrannosaurids are the largest (presumably
84 apex) predators differ from those in which the largest members are other theropod clades?
85 Theropod dinosaurs first appeared in the Late Triassic (Sereno 1999; Holtz and Osmólska 2004)
86 but were not the dominant predators until the loss of their competitors (primarily loricatan
87 pseudosuchians: Zanno et al. 2015) in the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event (Olsen et al. 2002).
88 During the subsequent 135 million years, theropods were the primary large-bodied flesh-eaters in
89 terrestrial ecosystems.
90
91 As such, the assemblage of theropods in a given faunal community can be considered an
92 ecological guild. As originally described by Root (1967), a guild comprises “a group of species
4 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 5 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
93 that exploit the same class of environmental resources in a similar way.” Therefore, members of
94 a guild are expected to be in principle each other’s most likely competitors, resulting in character
95 displacement (Brown and Wilson 1956; Van Valkenburgh 1988, 1994; Henderson 2000): the
96 selection for anatomical and behavioral adaptations that reduce the overlap of specific ecological
97 parameters for each taxon.
98
99 Aspects of theropod guild structure has been the subject of several previous studies. For
100 example, Henderson (2000) examined the functional differences in cranial form of sympatric
101 large theropods of the Morrison Formation. Van Valkenburgh and Molnar (2002) compared the
102 assemblages of theropods of the Morrison, Dinosaur Park, and Nemegt Formations with
103 communities of carnivorous mammals fromDraft various Cenozoic communities. Farlow and Pianka
104 (2003) observed the overlap in body size and form among the tyrannosaurids of the Dinosaur
105 Park Formation. Carbone et al. (2011) utilized theoretical ecology and the observed size
106 distribution of Hell Creek Formation dinosaurs to test the possibility of obligate scavenging in
107 Tyrannosaurus rex. More recently Torices et al. (2018) examined the functional differences in
108 tooth morphology for sympatric theropod species of western Canada. Frederickson et al. (2018)
109 studied niche partitioning in theropod dinosaurs in terms of diet and habitat preference in the
110 Mussentuchit Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation.
111
112 One significant observation about Mesozoic theropod guilds is the qualitative difference between
113 Jurassic and Early Cretaceous assemblages relative to the later Late Cretaceous assemblages of
114 western North America and eastern and central Asia (Foster et al. 2001; Farlow and Holtz 2002;
115 Holtz 2004a, 2004b). While the former communities show a diversity of theropod lineages
5 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 6 of 91
116 represented among the larger carnivores, the latter contain only members of Tyrannosauridae.
117 This transition occurred sometime after the Turonian (Zanno and Makovicky 2013; Zanno et al.
118 2019; Nesbitt et al. 2019) and before the middle Campanian (Loewen et al. 2013) in North
119 America. A similar pattern is observed in Asia, where the tyrannosauroid Timurlengia of the
120 Turonian Bissekty Formation is a mid-sized predator (Brusatte et al. 2016), while a larger
121 carcharodontosaurid has recently been reported from the same unit (Tanaka et al. 2020). The
122 slightly stratigraphically younger Turonian-Santonian Upper Bayan Shireh Formation of
123 Mongolia and Santonian Iren Dabasu Formation of Inner Mongolia (Averianov and Sues 2012)
124 lack evidence at present of carcharodontosaurids, although in the former the large dromaeosaurid
125 Achillobator rivals the sympatric tyrannosauroid cf. Alectrosaurus in size (Perle et al. 1999). In
126 the post-Santonian no large carnivorousDraft theropods other than tyrannosaurids are observed in this
127 region.
128
129 The cause of the transition from carcharodontosaurid- to tyrannosaurid-dominated theropod
130 guilds in Asiamerica is still not understood. The disappearance of previous apex theropod clades
131 such as Spinosauridae and Allosauroidea between the Turonian and the Campanian may be due
132 to out-competition by the newly evolved Tyrannosauridae, loss of the primary prey of these older
133 taxa, or other environmental changes, but poor sampling of the interval involved leaves the cause
134 of this transformation (and the similar event in Gondwana) unresolved at present.
135
136 The present study seeks to compare tyrant-dominated and non-tyrant-dominated theropod guilds
137 through a number of different parameters. “Tyrant” in this context refers to Tyrannosauridae
138 proper as well as other large-bodied immediate outgroups (such as Teratophoneus and
6 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 7 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
139 Appalachiosaurus: Brusatte and Carr 2016): taxa typically of 1000 kg or more with powerful
140 jaws and laterally expanded (incrassate) teeth, reduced forelimbs ending in a didactyl manus, and
141 elongate hindlimbs terminating in an arctometatarsus (Holtz 2004a). The more inclusive clade
142 Tyrannosauroidea contains Jurassic and Early-to-early Late Cretaceous groups of smaller-bodied
143 taxa including Coeluridae, Proceratosauridae (although at least two genera of this group achieved
144 tyrannosaurid sizes, Sinotyrannus and Yutyrannus: Ji et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2012), and
145 Stokesosauridae. These early tyrannosauroids were more typically middle-sized predators in
146 their respective guilds. Some Early-to-early Late Cretaceous tyrannosauroids of North America
147 and Asia such as Xiongguanlong, Moros, and Suskityrannus demonstrate that some of the
148 anatomical traits characteristic of Tyrannosauridae evolved in the context of smaller body size
149 (Li et al. 2010; Zanno et al. 2019; NesbittDraft et al. 2019).
150
151 INSTITUTIONAL ABBREVIATIONS
152 AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York, USA; BMRP,
153 Burpee Museum of Natural History, Rockford, Illinois, USA; FMNH, Field Museum of Natural
154 History, Chicago, Illinois, USA; PIN, Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences,
155 Moscow, Russia; ROM, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada.a
156
157 METHODS AND MATERIALS
158 Statistics for this study were calculated using the PAST 4.03 software package (Hammer et al.
159 2001; 2020).
160
7 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 8 of 91
161 Theropods range in size from Mellisuga hellenae (the bee hummingbird) to 14 m long, 8 tonne
162 or more giants including Tyrannosaurus rex, Giganotosaurus carolinii, and Spinosaurus
163 aegyptiacus (Mazzetta et al. 2004; Holtz and Osmólska 2004; Persons et al. 2020; Campione and
164 Evans 2020). Even removing the avialian (bird) component of this clade, the known lower end of
165 Mesozoic theropod range includes 50-cm long taxa such as Mei long and Microraptor zhaoianus.
166 Consequently, size represents a parameter in which the guild of carnivorous dinosaurs might
167 easily partition the niche of flesh-eaters, especially as predator body size is positively associated
168 with maximum prey body size and total range of prey sizes (Van Valkenburgh and Hertel 1998;
169 Meers 2002; Radloff and Du Toit 2004).
170
171 Size estimates for individual theropod specimensDraft are derived primarily from the supplementary
172 data of Benson et al. (2018) and Campione and Evans (2020); for taxa not included in those
173 previous analyses, size class was assigned based on those of other theropod species with the most
174 similar femoral, tibial, or skull length. The size classes used in this study are: size class 1, 10 kg
175 or less; size class 2, 11-50 kg; size class 3, 51-100 kg; size class 4, 101-500 kg; size class 5, 501-
176 1000 kg; size class 6, 1001-5000 kg; and size class 7, greater than 5000 kg. These broad
177 categories, rather than particular estimated masses, are employed to reduce the uncertainties
178 resulting from differences in mass estimation techniques, inaccurate models, incomplete
179 preservation of the specimens, and variability within the taxon (Campione and Evans 2020).
180 Where possible, the size of the largest known individual of that species was used as the best
181 approximation of adult body size, with the recognition that our limited data set for most dinosaur
182 species might not currently include fully adult individuals (Hone et al. 2016). Carbone et al.
183 (1999) found a transition in extant mammalian predators between those which fed on small prey
8 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 9 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
184 (less than ½ predator mass) to large prey (near predator mass) at 21.5-25 kg. This inflection point
185 is within size class 2 in this study. At present it is uncertain where the equivalent inflection point
186 would be in Mesozoic theropods (or indeed if there is such an inflection rather than a gradual
187 transition). Thus, the scheme used here is admittedly a simplification.
188
189 For purposes of comparison, this study seeks to examine sympatric communities of organisms:
190 that is, those which actually inhabited the same geographical region at the same time. Almost
191 assuredly most carnivorous theropod species had ranges that extended beyond a single
192 depositional basin (Farlow 1993), but most species of dinosaur are currently known from only a
193 single stratigraphic unit. The question as to the degree of intracontinental endemism and
194 provincialization in dinosaurian faunas remainsDraft a matter of debate (Sampson et al. 2010; Vavrek
195 and Larsson 2010; Lucas et al. 2016; Whitlock et al. 2018). While there may be some interaction
196 between faunal assemblages in different neighboring regions that are currently unrecognized due
197 to low levels of sampling (Vavrek and Larsson 2010), the present study takes the conservative
198 approach in using only taxa presently observed in the same stratigraphic units as being
199 sympatric. In at least the case of one individual of hadrosaurid from the Dinosaur Park Formation
200 it was found that the total geographic range based on strontium isotopic data was only on the
201 scale of a few 100 kms (Terrill et al. 2020), potentially justifying the restriction of faunas to
202 single depositional basins.
203
204 For some very well-sampled dinosaur-bearing strata, recent work has provided detailed
205 biozonation of the individual species, reducing the chance of including taxa that did not actually
206 exist at the same time. Fowler (2017) provides a comprehensive overview of this for dinosaurs of
9 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 10 of 91
207 the Santonian through Maastrichtian of the Western Interior of North America. Examples of
208 specific Western North American formations for which such data are available include the
209 Kimmeridgian-Tithonian Morrison Formation (Foster 2003), the middle-to-upper Campanian
210 Dinosaur Park Formation (Mallon 2019), and the Horseshoe Canyon Formation of the late
211 Campanian-early Maastrichtian (Eberth and Kamo 2019). These works additionally show that
212 individual dinosaur species were often present for relatively short geologic durations, shorter that
213 the deposition of the formations in which they were present. Thus, including all the species
214 recovered in a single formation as being part of the same faunal community may be exaggerating
215 the diversity, transforming successions of taxa into one fauna. However, detailed biostratigraphic
216 work has not been conducted or published for many dinosaur bearing strata. Consequently, the
217 study here may be combining taxa whichDraft did not actually interact in life for these formations.
218
219 The focus of this analysis is theropods as hypercarnivorous specialists feeding on other
220 dinosaurs. As such, regarding “carnivorous theropods” as a guild (a group of species that exploit
221 the same class of environmental resources in a similar way) rather than a clade (an ancestor and
222 all of its descendants), the highly derived pygostylians (Confusciusornis, enantiornithine, and
223 more derived birds: Cau 2018) are excluded from this particular study. None of the currently
224 known Mesozoic members of this clade are likely to have competed over the primary resource of
225 significance here, namely dead dinosaurs. The skull, and consequently the feeding ecology, of
226 the large probable ornithurine bird Gargantuavis remains unrecovered (Buffetaut and Angst
227 2020); however, barring discovery that this was a Maastrichtian phorusrhacid-mimic it will be
228 omitted as a dinosaur-eating theropod.
229
10 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 11 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
230 Similarly, the size class 1 theropods are excluded from the calculations in this study, as taxa of
231 such body size are more likely feeding on invertebrates and microvertebrates and again would
232 not be competing for comparable resources (Hirt et al. 2020). Additionally, several theropod
233 clades (including elaphrosaurine noasaurids, ornithomimosaurs, therizinosaurs, and
234 oviraptorosaurs) evolved away from the ancestral hypercarnivorous diet, instead incorporating
235 foods such as insects and plants (Zanno and Makovicky 2011); these non-predaceous theropods
236 are excluded from the histogram analysis but are included in the total dinosaurian diversity
237 portion of the study. While some of them may have consumed vertebrates, these were likely
238 restricted to small fish, amphibians, mammals, and lizards; it is unlikely that any of these taxa
239 routinely killed and ate other dinosaurs, except for eggs and hatchlings.
240 Draft
241 The skulls of the peculiar bahariasaurid (Motta et al. 2016; Porfiri et al. 2018; Lamana et al.
242 2020) theropods Deltadromeus agilis and Bahariasaurus ingens of early Late Cretaceous
243 northern Africa and Gualicho shinyae and Aoniraptor liberatem of comparable age in Argentina
244 lack cranial material, and it is possible that these represent large-bodied elaphrosaurine-like
245 noasaurids similar to the much-smaller non-carnivorous Limusaurus (Ibrahim et al. 2020). If so,
246 they should not be included among the predatory forms. However, they are here conservatively
247 assumed to have retained the ancestral carnivorous diet.
248
249 Other contemporaneous carnivorous taxa, including mammals (Hu et al. 2005), squamates (Wick
250 et al. 2015), and crocodyliforms (Boyd et al. 2013; Sellés et al. 2020) competed with theropods,
251 especially in the smaller size classes. However, the limited size and/or mobility of these taxa
252 compared to predatory dinosaurs meant they were likely only a minor portion of the terrestrial
11 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 12 of 91
253 predator guild where larger-bodied dinosaurs were concerned (but see Dal Sasso et al. 2017 for a
254 case of a substantial-sized terrestrial crocodyliform which may have served as the apex predator
255 of its Middle Jurassic community.) These non-dinosaurian carnivores are not included here either
256 as members of the predatory guild nor in the count of prey items.
257
258 Adult body size distribution histograms of each community (or potential community) of
259 carnivorous dinosaurs were assembled. Previous work (for example, Travouillon and Legendre
260 2009) has used this technique in comparing mammalian faunas. Longrich and Currie (2009) and
261 Carbone et al. (2011) have used this method in a limited fashion for a single theropod fauna
262 each, while Mallon (2019) used it to compare the Dinosaur Park Formation dinosaurian
263 assemblage to a series of Cenozoic mammalianDraft communities.
264
265 This study only examines faunal assemblages of the Jurassic and Cretaceous. While theropods
266 (Zahner and Brinkmann 2019; Marsh and Parker 2020; Müller 2020) and non-theropod
267 herrerasaurids (Pacheco et al. 2019) were part of the guild of medium-sized terrestrial carnivores
268 in the Late Triassic, the largest predators (as well as the most abundant and morphologically
269 disparate) in these faunal assemblages were pseudosuchian archosaurs (Brusatte et al. 2008;
270 Zanno et al. 2015). Future research to compare the carnivorous guilds of the Triassic with those
271 of the Jurassic and Cretaceous is planned but is not part of the present set of analyses.
272
273 The following parameters were used to evaluate whether a particular faunal assemblage was
274 included. At least three distinguishable carnivorous theropod taxa in size classes 2 upwards had
275 to have been confirmed. Additionally, a total of at least six distinguishable dinosaurian taxa (in
12 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 13 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
276 this case, including size class 1 carnivorous theropods, non-carnivorous theropods of any size,
277 and ornithischian and sauropodomorph dinosaurs) must be documented from this assemblage. In
278 determining total faunal diversity, instantaneous diversity counts were used rather than time-
279 binning: for instance, stratigraphically successive species within subclades of Centrosaurinae in
280 the same faunal zone in the Dinosaur Park Formation (Mallon 2019) would be considered as a
281 single species present at a given time, rather than two species for that fauna. (Whether these are
282 actually chronospecies or represent the termination of a lineage and a replacement from outside
283 this depositional basin is not considered in this analysis.) Woodruff (2019) highlighted some of
284 the difficulties in determining horizon-based species diversity in large dinosaurian taxa.
285
286 As a consequence, some particular faunasDraft in a sequence may be excluded even if those
287 stratigraphically above or below were part of the analysis. For instance, the uppermost biozone
288 of the Horseshoe Canyon Formation, containing the triceratopsin Eotriceratops xerinsularis, was
289 not included as total dinosaurian diversity was too low (Eberth and Kamo 2019). Similarly,
290 Morrison Zone 1 (the lowermost biozone of that unit) was excluded as lacking sufficient number
291 of diagnosable theropod taxa (Foster 2003). The Middle-to-Late Jurassic Yanliao biota of the
292 Daohugou Formation (Xu et al. 2013) and the Early Cretaceous Jehol biota of the Yixian and
293 Jiufotang Formations (Zhao 2014) were excluded as well: although exceptionally diverse in
294 terms of smaller-bodied (size classes 1 and 2) dinosaurian taxa, the depositional setting of these
295 Lagerstätten preferentially excludes common preservation of larger-bodied organisms and hence
296 these assemblages are not broadly comparable samples to more typical fluviolacustrine and
297 deltaic dinosaur-bearing formations. In the case of the Jiufotang Formation among
298 hypercarnivorous dinosaurs there is none currently described between the various (all size class
13 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 14 of 91
299 1) species of Microraptor and the proceratosaurid tyrannosauroid (size class 6) Sinotyrannus
300 kazuoensis: consequently, there is only that latter carnivorous theropod in the study range and
301 this assemblage fails to meet the “three or more diagnosable size 2 or larger carnivorous
302 theropod” criterion. A few of the Yixian hypercarnivorous coelurosaurs (the primitive
303 tyrannosauroid Dilong paradoxus and the compsognathids Huaxiangnathus orientalis and
304 Sinocalliopteryx gigas) reach size class 2. The first two of these are from the Liujiatun Bed,
305 while Sinocalliopteryx is from the older Jianshangou Bed and consequently nearly 1 Myr older.
306 Unfortunately, the stratigraphic level (and indeed most of the relevant geologic context) of the
307 one known giant theropod within the 8 Myr duration of the Yixian Formation (Chang et al.
308 2009), namely Yutyrannus huali (size class 6), is not presently described (Xu et al. 2012). This
309 hinders our ability to put this proceratosauridDraft in its proper faunal assemblage with regards to the
310 stratigraphically better constrained smaller bodied taxa.
311
312 It is recognized that the parameters chosen for the criteria are ultimately arbitrary and not
313 necessarily informed by some biological or sampling reality. They represent an intentional
314 compromise between restricting the study only to the small number of faunal assemblages that
315 have been subjected to substantial multi-decadal research on the one hand and the desire to
316 include as extensive a geographic and stratigraphic range of dinosaurian communities as
317 possible. Potentially future iterations of this or similar work might refine the methodology from
318 its initial version here.
319
320 A total of 60 faunal assemblages were recognized, from the Toarcian Cañadon Asfalto
321 Formation of Argentina (Pol et al. 2020) and the Bajocian-Callovian Xiashaximiao Formation
14 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 15 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
322 (Lower Shaximiao Formation, or Shunosaurus-Omeisaurus assemblage), of Sichuan and Yunnan
323 Basins, China (Li et al. 2011) through latest Maastrichtian upper Hell Creek Formation fauna of
324 the North American Western Interior (Fowler 2017). Twenty-nine of these (mostly from the later
325 Late Cretaceous of Asia and western North America: the Asiamerican landmass of that interval)
326 represent assemblages in which tyrannosaurids and their immediate outgroups were the apex
327 predators; the remaining 31 (representing the Jurassic through early Late Cretaceous, as well as
328 the Gondwanan landmasses of the late Late Cretaceous) had other taxa as their largest predators.
329 These faunal assemblages are described in Tables 1, S1, and S2.
330
331 Tyrannosauridae is not presently represented in any fauna in which that clade is not the apex
332 predator; however, earlier tyrannosauroidsDraft such as coelurids, proceratosaurids, and
333 stokesosaurids are present in communities with other theropods as the largest forms. These
334 earlier tyrannosauroids are so indicated on their respective histograms. In the present study
335 megaraptorids are not listed as being members of Tyrannosauroidea. However, some recent
336 analyses, such as Delcourt and Grillo (2018), Cau (2018), and Lamanna et al. (2020), find this
337 clade to represent a lineage within Tyrannosauroidea phylogenetically close to Tyrannosauridae.
338 Regardless of their phylogenetic affinity, the long slender snouts, ziphodont dentition, and large
339 grasping forelimbs with exceedingly large unguals of megaraptorids (Lamanna et al. 2020)
340 indicates a different style of prey acquisition in Megaraptoridae relative to Tyrannosauridae. The
341 presence or absence of members of Tyrannosauroidea other than Tyrannosauridae in the non-
342 tyrant faunas is not a factor of the analysis, but the position of these taxa as smaller predators in
343 earlier dinosaurian communities is shown of the histograms.
344
15 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 16 of 91
345 After histogram construction, the number of size classes in which adult predaceous theropods are
346 not currently discovered was assessed. Size class 1 (<10 kg) was excluded, as was size class 7
347 (>5000 kg) as only a few theropod lineages achieved this size. In some assemblages no size
348 classes were missing; in others all size classes between 2 and 7 were unoccupied (and thus 4
349 classes were missing.)
350
351 RESULTS
352 Some representative histograms from the better sampled tyrant faunas are shown in Fig. 2, and
353 from non-tyrant faunas in Fig. 3.
354
355 Box-and-whisker plots of the representativeDraft classes of fauna are shown as Fig. 4. For the tyrant
356 assemblages the mean number of missing cells was found to be 2.9±0.8 and a median of 3, while
357 for the non-tyrant assemblages this mean was 1.8±1.2 and a median of 2 (full statistics for this
358 and other analyses available in Table S3). To test to see if these represent statistically significant
359 distributions, Student t-tests testing for equal means and Mann-Whitney U-tests for distributions
360 around equal medians were conducted. These two classes were found to have statistically distinct
361 means (p = 0.000077) and medians (p = 0.00024). Thus, there is a quantitative difference in the
362 size distribution of theropods in communities in which tyrannosaurids are present versus those in
363 which tyrants are absent.
364
365 It is recognized that not all formations have been equally well surveyed. Some have only been
366 explored for a few field seasons, while others have had multiple teams engaged in field work
367 every field season for multiple decades. Nevertheless, this difference in fieldwork does not seem
16 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 17 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
368 to be the sole or even primary reason for missing medium-sized theropods in the tyrant-
369 dominated assemblages. While it is true that some of the Campano-Maastrichtian Asiamerican
370 strata have only been explored for a few field seasons, other tyrant-bearing formations such as
371 the Hell Creek, Horseshoe Canyon, Dinosaur Park, Nemegt, and Kaiparowits are among the
372 most intensely surveyed dinosaur-bearing units known, rivaled by very few others (e.g., the
373 Morrison). Thus, we would expect on average a better knowledge of theropods of all sizes within
374 these formations compared to more poorly sampled ones, and yet intermediate-sized taxa are rare
375 or absent in these well-studied units. In contrast, less well-studied units such as the Cañadón
376 Asfalto and Huincul Formations of Argentina have already yielded a high diversity of medium-
377 to-large carnivorous theropods (in the first case, the allosauroid Asfaltovenator vialidadi, the
378 megalosauroids Piatnitzkysaurus floresiDraft and Condorraptor currumili, and the abelisauroid
379 Eoabelisaurus mefi, and in the second the carcharodontosaurids Mapusaurus rosea and
380 Taurovenator violantei, the abelisaurids Skorpiovenator bustingorryi, Ilokelesia
381 aguadagrandensis, and Tralkasaurus cuyi, and the ?bahariasaurids Gualicho shinyae and
382 Aoniraptor liberatem.)
383
384 One possibility that might explain this difference would be if the potential prey diversity were
385 lower in the tyrant-dominated assemblages, so that there was less opportunity for niche
386 partitioning among the carnivores and thus lower overall spread of theropod sizes. Recognizing
387 that not all theropods would have eaten dinosaurs of all size classes (Hone and Rauhut 2010), in
388 principle we might expect a more diverse food resource base to support a broader variety of
389 carnivores and thus more extensive niche partitioning. Additionally, all the prey taxa had to pass
390 through the smaller size classes on their way to adulthood, and thus were potentially prey for
17 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 18 of 91
391 smaller theropods while they were hatchlings and juveniles (e.g., even Brachiosaurus and
392 Brontosaurus were potential food for Ornitholestes).
393
394 Fig. 5A shows the plot of carnivorous theropod diversity against total faunal size; no clear
395 distinction between the two classes is apparent. Box-and-whisker plots of these data are shown in
396 Fig. 5B. The mean number of dinosaurian taxa in the tyrant-dominated assemblages is 13.9±5.8
397 and a median of 14. In contrast the non-tyrant mean is in fact slightly lower, with a mean of
398 12.4±4.3 and a median of 12. This slight difference is statistically insignificant, however, as
399 analysis fails to reject the null hypothesis for either the mean (p = 0.28) or the median (p = 0.47).
400
401 A related issue to consider is the effect ofDraft the presence or absence of sauropod dinosaurs within
402 the community. Such exceedingly large-bodied prey, often greatly exceeding the predator mass
403 in the same faunal assemblage (Sander et al. 2010), could conceivably serve as food items for the
404 entire predatory theropod guild between their eggs to adulthood. The same tyrant dominated
405 Asiamerican communities, or more specifically most of the western North American
406 (Laramidian) component of these, are noteworthy in being among the very few Jurassic and
407 Cretaceous dinosaurian faunal assemblages in which sauropods were absent (D’Emic et al.
408 2010). Among the faunas in this study, only the Bissekty Formation (Turonian of Uzbekistan)
409 among the non-tyrant assemblages lacks a known sauropod presence, while among the tyrant
410 assemblages sauropods are known at present only from the Iren Dabasu, Bayan Shireh, and
411 Nemegt Formations of Mongolia and the Javelina Formation and Naashoibito Member of the
412 Ojo Alamo Formation of the late Maastrichtian of the American Southwest (D’Emic et al. 2010).
413
18 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 19 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
414 In order to see if the presence of sauropods is reflected in the number of missing size classes,
415 another iteration of comparisons was conducted (Fig. 6). The mean number of missing sizes in
416 sauropod faunas was a mean of 1.9±0.2 and a median value of 2, while those lacking sauropods
417 had a mean of 2.9±0.2 and a median value of 3. Similar to the comparison of tyrant vs. non-
418 tyrant faunas, it was found that these classes were found to have statistically distinct means (p =
419 0.0021) and medians (p = 0.0059). Thus, this reinforces the observation that the dinosaurian
420 faunas of Campano-Maastrichtian Laramidia (at least) show a different observed guild structure
421 than typical Jurassic-Cretaceous theropod communities.
422
423 DISCUSSION
424 Might the apparent lack of middle-sizedDraft (50-1000 kg) predatory dinosaurs in many communities
425 of the Campanian and Maastrichtian of Asiamerica be the product of undersampling? This seems
426 unlikely, as these include some of the best studied dinosaurian assemblages in the world (e.g.,
427 Lyson and Longrich 2011; Horner et al. 2011; Larson and Currie 2013; Fowler 2017; Mallon
428 2019; Eberth and Kamo 2019).
429
430 That is not to say that middle-sized predatory dinosaurs are entirely absent in these assemblages.
431 DePalma et al. (2015) document the existence of Dakotaraptor steini, a size class 4 (101-500 kg)
432 dromaeosaurid in the upper Hell Creek community. However, its remains are apparently rare
433 enough that its presence was not recovered at all in major census studies of the Hell Creek
434 Formation (Lyson and Longrich 2011; Horner et al. 2011). The troodontid Latenivenatrix
435 mcmasterae is a size class 3 (50-100 kg) theropod distributed in both Megaherbivore Zones 1
436 and 2 within the Dinosaur Park Formation (van der Reest and Currie 2017). Holtz et al. (1998)
19 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 20 of 91
437 proposed that at least some of the troodontids were omnivorous rather than strictly herbivorous,
438 and it might be that they fed on smaller-bodied dinosaurs than comparable-sized
439 eudromaeosaurs; this would be consistent with Torices et al.’s (2018) estimation that troodontids
440 favored softer, smaller, or immobile prey. Potentially Latenivenatrix may have effectively been a
441 “smaller” predator than its body size would suggest. Similarly, in the Nemegt Formation the
442 enigmatic theropod Bagaraatan ostromi is a size class 3 carnivore (Osmólska 1996). However,
443 the latter is known from a single incomplete skeleton at present. Additionally, there is a size class
444 4 tyrannosaurid (Alioramus altai) in that community, as well as the apex predator Tarbosaurus
445 bataar (at size class 5).
446
447 However, as the histogram studies show,Draft this situation is in contrast to that seen in typical
448 Jurassic and Early Cretaceous dinosaurian communities, where middle sized taxa (including
449 ceratosaurids, piatnitzkysaurids, metriacanthosaurids, neovenatorids, megaraptorids, and early
450 tyrannosauroids such proceratosaurids and stokesosaurids) occupied these intermediate sizes
451 below the apex predators.
452
453 If the distinction of the missing middle-sized portion of the theropod communities is indeed an
454 actual attribute of these assemblages and not simply a taphonomic sampling issue, what might
455 this imply about dinosaurian ecosystems of the Campanian and Maastrichtian of Asiamerica?
456 One possibility briefly suggested previously by Holtz (2004a, 2004b) is that the younger
457 individuals of tyrannosaurids might have occupied these middle-sized niches. That is while the
458 earlier growth stages of (for example Tarbosaurus bataar) were not actually distinct taxa such as
459 “Gorgosaurus novojilovi’ and “Gorgosaurus lancinator”, but that they were ecologically
20 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 21 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
460 functioning as distinct predators in their communities. Ontogenetic niche shifts have recently
461 been proposed on isotopic evidence in the Early Cretaceous dromaeosaurid Deinonychus
462 antirrhopus (Frederickson 2020).
463
464 Consider small-bodied tyrannosaurid individuals such as juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex BMRP
465 2002.4.1 or the juvenile Gorgosaurus libratus AMNH 5664 or ROM 1247 (size class 5
466 individuals). At this size their bite forces are an order of magnitude smaller than the adult
467 individuals (Bates and Falkingham 2012; Gignac and Erickson 2017; Therrien et al. this issue),
468 while their agility as measured by the ability to turn quickly was considerably higher (Snively et
469 al. 2019). At less than 1000 kg these individuals would still be in a size range in which their
470 elongate distal limb proportions would provideDraft a net benefit in maximal speed relative to shorter
471 limbed animals (Dececchi et al. 2020). Such an individual would be functionally distinct from
472 adults of the same species. It might be easier for these partially grown individuals to acquire and
473 dispatch smaller and more agile prey such as ornithomimids, thescelosaurids, and
474 pachycephalosaurids than it would be for the more massive adult relatives. Indeed, Codron et al.
475 (2013) argued that very large theropods may have found such small prey insufficient to supply
476 their meat requirements. In contrast, young tyrannosaurid individuals would likely lack sufficient
477 force to take down the large prey animals such as adult hadrosaurids and ceratopsids known to
478 have been fed upon by fully grown tyrannosaurids (Gignac and Erickson 2017; Therrien et al.
479 this issue). At least some subadult tyrannosaurids were feeding on large-sized food sources
480 (Peterson and Daus 2019), but whether they were scavenging or took down this large prey cannot
481 be determined. Even the mode of prey acquisition and manipulation would be expected to be
482 different in juvenile and sub-adult tyrannosaurids relative to adults. For instance, in some
21 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 22 of 91
483 tyrannosaurid taxa the smaller individuals have proportionately longer arms (compare 660 kg
484 Tyrannosaurus rex BMRP 2002.4.1 with a humerus 0.39 times the estimated length of the femur,
485 to 0.29 for the same ratio in the ten-times larger specimen FMNH PR2081); the proportionately
486 longer forelimb of younger and weaker-jawed Tyrannosaurus might have served in a form of
487 prey capture or manipulation which was lost or greatly reduced in later growth stages.
488
489 While some workers consider certain tyrannosaurid specimens (including BMRP 2002.4.1) of
490 the Hell Creek Formation as representing a distinct taxon Nanotyrannus lancensis (Bakker et al.
491 1988; Larson 2013; Persons and Currie 2018), the observation would still remain that younger
492 individuals of Tyrannosaurus rex would necessarily pass through these intermediate size ranges.
493 Furthermore, the published specimens ofDraft this proposed taxon demonstrate juvenile histological
494 (Woodward et al. 2020) and morphological (Carr 2020) traits, so that even if it is its own species
495 the adult form would presumably be a larger animal.
496
497 Brett-Surman (1989, 1997) proposed the concept of “niche assimilation”: the observation that
498 large dinosaurs, as terrestrial animals which went through multiple orders of magnitude size
499 growth during ontogeny, were functionally equivalent to what would be in large mammals
500 several successive niches occupied by separate species. For instance, an individual of
501 Edmontosaurus annectens was hatched as a dik-dik (Madoqua spp.) sized small browser but as
502 an adult equaled or exceeded the size of Loxodonta africana, and thus throughout its life cycle
503 operates as the functional ornithischian equivalent of the Serengeti’s entire size range of hoofed
504 mammals.
505
22 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 23 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
506 As proposed here, the “tyrannosaurid niche assimilation hypothesis” is the concept that juvenile
507 and subadult members of Tyrannosauridae were the functional equivalent of earlier middle-sized
508 theropod carnivores. Of course, all theropods of size classes 6 and 7 would have occupied these
509 smaller size classes during their growth from hatching to maturity, and thus broadly speaking
510 went through the same general niche shifts as tyrannosaurids. However, species in communities
511 with closer packing of niches might be suspected as being under a different set of selective
512 pressures than those experienced by a species which was the only member of the guild
513 occupying those sizes. Thus, from this hypothesis several predictions can be made.
514
515 1) Transitions from one phase of niche occupation to the next might involve rapid transitions or
516 transformations rather than simple gradualDraft allometric trends. Imansyah et al. (2008) and
517 Purwanda et al. (2016) have demonstrated such transformations in anatomy and life habits in
518 Varanus komodoensis. Ecological thresholds concerning (for instance) size of prey and style of
519 prey acquisition may be relatively abrupt with increasing size, as described by Carbone et al.
520 (1999), Randolff and Du Toit (2004), and Hirt et al. (2020) (although these authors were
521 concerned with predatory taxa of different sizes rather than different sized individuals of the
522 same species.) Carr (2020), in the most thorough analysis of Mesozoic theropod ontogeny so far,
523 has demonstrated that in Tyrannosaurus rex in particular a “secondary metamorphosis” from
524 juvenile to subadult forms, evidenced in nearly every portion of the skeletal anatomy he studied.
525 Additional comparable work on the ontogeny of other large theropods species may demonstrate
526 to what degree this was unique to Tyrannosaurus rex, or if were more widespread among
527 tyrannosaurids, or if it were present in theropods in more closely packed guilds. Cullen et al.
528 (2020) demonstrated in a single individual of large bodied carcharodontosaurid from the Huincul
23 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 24 of 91
529 Formation that it showed a much more gradual growth pattern rather than the accelerated growth
530 phase as seen in tyrannosaurids; whether this attribute is present in other non-tyrannosaurids
531 remains to be discovered.
532
533 2) In faunas with multiple middle-to-large bodied predatory theropod species, niche partitioning
534 would favor the rapid achievement of adult body size to reduce competition with other sized
535 sympatric theropod species. In contrast, under the tyrannosaurid niche assimilation hypothesis
536 such a pressure might be relaxed for tyrant dinosaurs, such that the energy available from small-
537 to-middle sized prey might be more effectively exploited by the predatory species before it grew
538 too large to acquire such food resources.
539 Draft
540 The study of ontogeny has been greatly enhanced by histologically based within-species growth
541 curve analysis (Erickson et al. 2001; Erickson 2014; Woodward et al. 2015). Tyrannosaurids
542 have been among the first and most extensively dinosaurian taxa so studied (Erickson et al. 2004,
543 2006, 2010). While the best or preferred specific methodology for growth curve fitting remains
544 debated (Lee and Werning 2008; Erickson 2014; Myhrvold 2016), age of somatic maturity can
545 generally be assessed by the onset of the external fundamental system (EFS). Previous work has
546 found that tyrannosaurids have among the latest such onset among non-sauropod dinosaurs. For
547 instance, Erickson et al. (2004) found the EFS appeared in tyrannosaurids around ages 14-16 for
548 Albertosaurus, Gorgosaurus, and Daspletosaurus and 18.5 for Tyrannosaurus; in contrast, full
549 somatic maturity was found to be achieved at 9 years in the hadrosaurid Maiasaura (Woodward
550 et al. 2015) and estimated at 10-15 years in the larger hadrosaurid Edmontosaurus (Vanderven et
551 al. 2014).
24 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 25 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
552
553 However, at present while the data for tyrannosaurids can compared to small-bodied theropods
554 and to herbivorous dinosaur species, there are few published studies of other large-bodied
555 theropods for comparison. Despite a large sample size examined no specimen of the Jurassic
556 allosauroid Allosaurus fragilis has been found with an EFS (Bybee et al. 2006; Lee and Werning
557 2008), suggesting we may not have a fully-grown specimen of this commonly recovered
558 theropod species or alternatively that this species did not have determinate growth. (The large
559 sympatric allosaurid Saurophaganax maximus may in fact be the fully adult form of Allosaurus,
560 but this has yet to be assessed histologically.) Thus, we are not currently in a situation to
561 compare growth history patterns of tyrannosaurids to most other large theropods. Such data
562 would be extremely useful in determiningDraft if theropods in closely packed ecosystems had growth
563 patterns similar to tyrannosaurids (perhaps achieving full body size earlier) or not. Indeed,
564 Cullen et al. (2020) found the opposite of the prediction here, and instead that the growth of an
565 unnamed Huincul Formation carcharodontosaurid was more gradual and extended than in
566 tyrannosaurids. Future studies will help to see if this is a typical pattern among non-
567 tyrannosaurid giant theropods.
568
569 3) Similar patterns of niche assimilation may be present in later Late Cretaceous Gondwanan
570 theropod guilds. While earlier Late Cretaceous southern continent theropod guilds typically
571 included members of both the ceratosaurian group Abelisauridae and the enigmatic coelurosaur
572 clade Megaraptoridae, the latter clade is not known to extend beyond the Santonian or early
573 Campanian in northern South America, while giant megaraptorids are present and abelisaurids
574 apparently absent in Campano-Maastrichtian southern South America (Porfiri et al. 2018;
25 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 26 of 91
575 Lamanna et al. 2020). Thus, just as the Tyrannosauridae would have been the sole large-bodied
576 theropods of late Campanian and Maastrichtian, the Abelisauridae and Megaraptoridae may have
577 been in the same situation for their respective regions of Gondwana in the same time interval.
578 Thus, they would have had a similar release from the selective pressure of niche partitioning and
579 might have assimilated the niches once occupied by middle-sized theropods in a comparable
580 fashion. If so, we might similarly predict comparable rapid transformations in morphology
581 during ontogeny and/or delays in achievement of somatic maturity as hypothesized for
582 Tyrannosauridae.
583
584 As is typical for dinosaurian studies, however, we are hindered by the small sample size of
585 individuals and a dearth of relevant specimens.Draft Future discoveries of growth series of
586 abelisaurids, allosauroids, and other large-bodied theropods, including documentation of their
587 anatomical transformations and histologically assessed chronological ages, will bring our
588 understanding of these other groups of carnivorous dinosaurs to a comparable state as that
589 achieved for tyrannosaurids.
590
591 CONCLUSIONS
592 All large-bodied carnivorous theropod dinosaurs necessarily passed through a wide range of
593 body sizes from hatching to adulthood. Consequently, unless they were provisioned throughout
594 growth, the ecological niche of any given individual shifted throughout its lifetime. For Jurassic
595 through early Late Cretaceous this transition occurred in the context of ecosystems in which the
596 juveniles and subadults potentially competed with other theropod species with medium adult
597 body sizes. As shown here, however, there is an observed quantitative distinction between the
26 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 27 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
598 theropod guilds of Campano-Maastrichtian Asiamerica and most of the rest of theropod-
599 dominated communities. In the former, tyrannosaurid juveniles and subadults represent most or
600 all of the intermediate-sized carnivorous forms, as medium-sized predatory taxa of other clades
601 are rare or absent. This distinction is independent of the total diversity of potential dinosaurian
602 prey. The cause of this ecological isolation of Tyrannosauridae in Campano-Maastrichtian
603 Asiamerica compared to the rather more ecologically densely packed guilds of other dinosaurian
604 communities remains unresolved. It is noteworthy that in Campanian and early Maastrichtian
605 Laramidia at least these same tyrant-dominated communities are also absent any confirmed
606 sauropod dinosaurs, which might serve throughout their own ontogeny to serve as prey for
607 theropods of all size classes; that said, sauropods are present in at least some Asian tyrant-
608 dominated communities and in the AmericanDraft southwest during the late Maastrichtian.
609
610 The absence of potential mid-sized competitors in Campano-Maastrichtian Asiamerica may be a
611 factor in some evolutionary transformations in Tyrannosauridae not yet documented in other
612 large-bodied theropod clades. In particular, tyrannosaurids show profound transitions in potential
613 prey acquisition and dispatch adaptations such as bite force and agility, and recent work on the
614 ontogeny of tyrant dinosaurs demonstrates that in at least some of these species these ontogenetic
615 transformations occurred quite rapidly and dramatically. This might reflect selection in
616 tyrannosaurid evolution favoring distinctly different ecomorphologies and prey selection at
617 different ontogenetic phases as this lineage assimilated the otherwise missing niches of the
618 theropod predatory guilds.
619
620 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
27 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 28 of 91
621 I would like to thank the editors for the invitation to contribute to this volume. Dale Russell was
622 among the first professional vertebrate paleontologists outside my graduate committee to advise
623 me and support my research in its early days. Conversations with him about dinosaur ecology
624 and ontogeny were among the initial inspiration for the research that led to this study. Even more
625 so, Dale emphasized to me (and to all scientists) the importance of speculation, creativity, and
626 wonder in our examination of the natural world; I hope that some of that encouragement is
627 reflected here.
628
629 In additional to Dale Russell, other researchers whose discussions and conversations led to my
630 initial exploration of the topics here include Michael Brett-Surman, Thomas Carr, Phil Currie,
631 Jim Farlow, and Ralph Molnar. I am indebtedDraft to the two anonymous reviewers and to the editors
632 of this issue for their suggestions and corrections which greatly improved this research. In
633 particular, one of the reviewers and (assuming said reviewer was not him) Roger Benson
634 encouraged the iteration of the analysis exploring sauropod versus non-sauropod communities.
635
28 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 29 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
636 REFERENCES
637 Auffenberg, W. 1981. The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor. Univ. Press of Florida,
638 Gainesville, Fla. 406 pp.
639
640 Averianov, A., and H.-D. Sues. 2012. Correlation of Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate
641 assemblages in Middle and Central Asia. Journal of Stratigraphy 36: 462-485. Available from
642 https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/19377/paleo_AVERIANOV_and_SUES_2012B
643 .pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1 [Accessed 29 December 2020].
644
645 Bakker, R. T., Williams, M., and Currie, P. J. 1988. Nanotyrannus, a new genus of pygmy
646 tyrannosaur, from the latest Cretaceous Draftof Montana. Hunteria 1(5): 1-30.
647
648 Bates, K.T., and P.L. Falkingham. 2012. Estimating the maximum bite performance in
649 Tyrannosaurus rex using multi-body dynamics. Biology Letters 8: 660-664. doi:
650 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0056.
651
652 Benson, R.B.J., G. Hunt, M.T. Carrano, and N. Campione. 2018. Cope’s rule and the adaptive
653 landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology 61: 13-48. doi: 10.1111/pala.12329.
654
655 Boyd, C.A., S.K. Drumheller, and T.A. Gates. 2013. Crocodyliform feeding traces on juvenile
656 ornithischian dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Kaiparowits Formation, Utah.
657 PLoS ONE 8(2): e57605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057605.
658
29 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 30 of 91
659 Brett-Surman, M.K. 1989. A revision of the Hadrosauridae (Reptilia: Ornithischia) and their
660 evolution during the Campanian and Maastrichtian. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, George
661 Washington University, Washington, DC.
662
663 Brett-Surman, M.K. 1997. Ornithopods. In The Complete Dinosaur. Edited by J.O. Farlow and
664 M.K. Brett-Surman. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind. pp. 330-346.
665
666 Brown, W.L., and E.O. Wilson. 1956. Character displacement. Systematic Zoology 5: 49-64.
667 Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2411924 [accessed 13 September 2020].
668
669 Brusatte, S.L., and T.D. Carr. 2016. TheDraft phylogeny and evolutionary history of tyrannosauroid
670 dinosaurs. Scientific Reports 6: 20252. doi: 10.1038/srep20252.
671
672 Brusatte, S.L., M.J. Benton, M. Ruta, and G.T. Lloyd. 2008. Superiority, competition, and
673 opportunism in the evolutionary radiation of dinosaurs. 2008. Science 321: 1485-1488. doi:
674 10.1126/science.1161833.
675
676 Brusatte, S.L., A. Averianov, H.-D. Sues, A. Muir, and I.B. Butler. 2016. New tyrannosaur from
677 the mid-Cretaceous of Uzbekistan clarifies evolution of giant body size and advanced senses in
678 tyrant dinosaurs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 3447-3452. doi:
679 10.1073/pnas.1600140113.
680
30 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 31 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
681 Buttetaut, E., and D. Angst. Gargantuavis is an insular basal ornithurine: a comment on Mayr et
682 al., 2020, ‘A well-preserved pelvis from the Maastrichtian of Romania suggests that the
683 enigmatic Gargantuavis is neither an ornithurine bird nor an insular endemic’. Cretaceous
684 Research 112: 104438. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104438.
685
686 Bybee, P.J., A.H. Lee, and E.T. Lamm. 2006. Sizing the Jurassic theropod dinosaur Allosaurus:
687 assessing growth strategy and evolution of ontogenetic scaling of limbs. Journal of Morphology
688 267: 347-359. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10406.
689
690 Campione, N.E., and D.C. Evans. 2020. The accuracy and precision of body mass estimation in
691 non-avian dinosaurs. Biological ReviewsDraft 95: 1759-1797. doi: 10.1111/brv.12638.
692
693 Carbone, C., G.M. Mace, S.C. Roberts and D.W. Macdonald. 1999. Energetic constraints on the
694 diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature 402: 286-288. doi: 10.1038/46266.
695
696 Carbone, C., S.T. Turvey, and J. Bielby. 2011. Intra-guild competition and its implications for
697 one of the biggest terrestrial predators, Tyrannosaurus rex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B
698 278: 2682-2690. doi: 10.1098/rsbp.2010.2497.
699
700 Carr, T.D. 1999. Craniofacial ontogeny in Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria: Coelurosauria). Journal
701 of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 497-520. doi: 10.1080/02724634.1999.10011161.
702
31 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 32 of 91
703 Carr, T.D. 2020. A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple
704 lines of evidence. PeerJ 8: e9192. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9192.
705
706 Carr, T.D., and T.E. Williamson. 2004. Diversity of late Maastrichtian Tyrannosauridae
707 (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from western North America. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
708 Society 142: 479-523. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00130.x.
709
710 Cau, A. 2018. The assembly of the avian body plan: a 160-million-year long process. Bolletino
711 della Società Palaeontologica Italiana 57: 1-25. doi: 10.4435/BSPI.2018.1.
712
713 Chang, S., H. Zhang, P.R. Renne, and Y.Draft Fang. 2009. High-precision 40Ar/39Ar age for the Jehol
714 Biota. Palaeogeography, Palaoclimatology, Palaeoecology 280: 94-104. doi:
715 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.06.021.
716
717 Codron, D., C. Carbone, and M. Clauss. 2013. Ecological interactions in dinosaur communities:
718 influences of small offspring and complex ontogenetic life histories. PLoS ONE 8(10): e77110.
719 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077110.
720
721 Cullen, T.M., J.I. Canale, S. Apestuguía, N.D. Smith, D. Hu, and P.J. Makovicky. 2020.
722 Osteohistological analyses reveal diverse strategies of theropod dinosaur body-size evolution.
723 Proceedings of the Royal Society B 287: 20202258. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2258.
724
32 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 33 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
725 Currie, P.J. 2003. Allometric growth in tyrannosaurids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper
726 Cretaceous of North America and Asia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 40: 651-665. doi:
727 10.1139/E02-083.
728
729 Currie, P.J., and D.A. Eberth. 2010. On gregarious behavior in Albertosaurus. Canadian Journal
730 of Earth Sciences 47: 1277-1289. doi: 10.1139/E10-072.
731
732 D’Emic, M.D., J.A. Wilson, and R. Thompson. 2010. The end of the sauropod dinosaur hiatus in
733 North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 297: 486-490. doi:
734 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.08.032.
735 Draft
736 Dal Sasso C, Pasini G, Fleury G, Maganuco S. 2017. Razanandrongobe sakalavae, a gigantic
737 mesoeucrocodylian from the Middle Jurassic of Madagascar, is the oldest known notosuchian.
738 PeerJ 5: e3481 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3481
739
740 Dececchi, T.A., A.M. Mloszewska, T.R. Holtz, Jr., M.B. Habib, and H.C.E. Larsson. 2020. The
741 fast and the frugal: divergent locomotor strategies drive limb lengthening in theropod
742 dinosaurs. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0223698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223698.
743
744 Delcourt, R., and O.N. Grillo. 2018. Tyrannosauroids from the Southern Hemisphere:
745 implications for biogeography, evolution, and taxonomy. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
746 Paleoecology 511: 379-387. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.09.003.
747
33 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 34 of 91
748 DePalma, R.A., D.A. Burnham, L.D. Martin, P.L. Larson, and R.T. Bakker. 2015 The first giant
749 raptor (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Hell Creek Formation. Paleontological
750 Contributions 14: 1-16. doi: 10.17161/paleo.1808.18764
751
752 Eberth, D.A., and S.L. Kamo. 2019. High-precision U-Pb CA-ID-TIMS dating and
753 chronostratigraphy of the dinosaur-rich Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Upper Cretaceous,
754 Campanian-Maastrichtian), Red Deer River valley, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth
755 Sciences 57: 1220-1237. doi: 10.1139/cjes-2019-0019.
756
757 Erickson, G.M. 2014. On dinosaur growth. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 47:
758 675-697. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054858.Draft
759
760 Erickson, G.M., K. Curry Rogers, and S. Yerby. 2001. Dinosaur growth patterns and rapid avian
761 growth rates. Nature 412: 429–433. doi: 10.1038/35086558.
762
763 Erickson, G.M., P.J. Makovicky, P.J. Currie, M.A. Norell, S.A. Yerby, and C.A. Brochu. 2004.
764 Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Nature 430: 772-
765 775. doi: 10.1038/nature02699.
766
767 Erickson, G.M., P.J. Currie, B.D. Inouye, and A.A. Winn. 2006. Tyrannosaur life tables: an
768 example of nonavian dinosaur population biology. Science 313: 213-217. doi:
769 10.1126/science.1125721.
770
34 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 35 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
771 Erickson, G.M., P.J. Currie, B.D. Inouye, and A.A. Winn. 2010. A revised life table and
772 survivorship curve for Albertosaurus sarcophagus based on the Dry Island mass death
773 assemblage. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 47: 1269-1275. doi: 10.1139/E10-051.
774
775 Farlow, J. O. 1993. On the rareness of big, fierce animals: speculations about the body sizes,
776 population densities, and geographic ranges of predatory mammals and large carnivorous
777 dinosaurs. American Journal of Science 293-A: 167-199. Available from
778 http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~ajs/1993/11.1993.06Farlow.pdf [Accessed on 13 September
779 2020].
780
781 Farlow, J.O. and T.R. Holtz, Jr. 2002. TheDraft fossil record of predation in dinosaurs. In The Fossil
782 Record of Predation. Edited by M. Kowalewski and P.H. Kelley. The Paleontological Society
783 Papers 8, pp. 251-266.
784
785 Farlow, J.O., and E.R. Pianka. 2002. Body size overlap, habitat partitioning and living space
786 requirements of terrestrial vertebrate predators: implications for the paleoecology of large
787 theropod dinosaurs. Historical Biology 16: 21-40. doi: 10.1080/0891296031000154687.
788
789 Foster, J.R. 2003. Paleoecological analysis of the vertebrate fauna of the Morrison Formation
790 (Upper Jurassic), Rocky Mountain region, U.S.A. New Mexico Mueum of Natural History &
791 Science Bulletin 23: 1-95.
792
35 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 36 of 91
793 Foster, J.R., T.R. Holtz, Jr., and D.J. Chure. 2001. Contrasting patterns of diversity and
794 community structure in the theropod faunas of the Late Jurassic and Late Cretaceous of western
795 North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21 (suppl. to 3): 51A.
796
797 Fowler, D.W. 2017. Revised geochronology, correlation, and dinosaur stratigraphic ranges of the
798 Santonian-Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) formations of the Western Interior of North America.
799 PLoS ONE 12(11): e0188426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188426.
800
801 Frederickson. J.A., M.H. Engel, and R.L. Cifelli. 2018. Niche partitioning in theropod dinosaurs:
802 diet and habitat preference in predators from the uppermost Cedar Mountain Formation (Utah,
803 U.S.A.). Scientific Reports 8: 17872. Doi:Draft 10.1038/s41598-018-35689-6.
804
805 Frederickson. J.A., M.H. Engel, and R.L. Cifelli. 2020. Ontogenetic dietary shifts in
806 Deinonychus antirrhopus (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae): insights into the ecology and social
807 behavior of raptorial dinosaurs through stable isotopes. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
808 Palaeoecology 552: 109780. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109780.
809
810 Gignac, P.M., and G.M. Erickson. 2017. The biomechanics behind extreme osteophagy in
811 Tyrannosaurus rex. Scientific Reports 7: 479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02161-w.
812
813 Hammer, Ø., D.A.T. Harper, and P.D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software
814 Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9 pp. Version 4.03
815 (2020). Available from https://folk.uio.no/ohammeer/past [Accessed 13 September 2020].
36 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 37 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
816
817 Henderson, D.M. 2000. Skull and tooth morphology as indicators of niche partitioning in
818 theropods. Gaia 15: 219-226. Available from
819 http://www.arca.museus.ul.pt/ArcaSite/obj/gaia/MNHNL-0000784-MG-DOC-web.PDF
820 [Accessed on 13 September 2020].
821
822 Hirt, M.R., M. Tucker, T. Müller, B. Rosenbaum, and U. Brose. 2020. Rethinking trophic niches:
823 speed and body mass colimit prey space of mammalian predators. Ecology and Evolution 10:
824 7094-7105. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6411.
825
826 Holtz, T.R., Jr. 2004a. Tyrannosauroidea.Draft In The Dinosauria, 2nd Edition. Edited by D.B.
827 Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif. pp.
828 111-136.
829
830 Holtz, T.R., Jr. 2004b. Taxonomic diversity, morphological disparity, and guild structure in
831 theropod carnivore communities: implications for paleoecology and life history strategies in
832 tyrant dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24 (supplement to 3): 72A.
833
834 Holtz, T.R., Jr., and H. Osmólska. 2004. Saurischia. In The Dinosauria, 2nd Edition. Edited by
835 D.B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.
836 pp. 21-24.
837
37 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 38 of 91
838 Holtz, T.R., Jr., D.L. Brinkman, and C.L. Chandler. 1998. Denticle morphometrics and a
839 possibly omnivorous feeding habit for the theropod dinosaur Troodon. Gaia 15: 159-166.
840 Available from https://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/gaiatroo.pdf [Accessed on 27 December
841 2020].
842
843 Hone, D.W.E., A.A. Farke and M.J. Wedel. 2016. Ontogeny and the fossil record: what, if
844 anything, is an adult dinosaur? Biology Letters 12: 0947. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0947.
845
846 Hone, D.W.E., and O.W.M. Rauhut. 2010. Feeding behaviour and bone utilization by theropod
847 dinosaurs. Lethaia 43: 232-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00187.x.
848 Draft
849 Horner, J.R., M.B. Goodwin, and N. Myhrvold. 2011. Dinosaur census reveals
850 abundant Tyrannosaurus and rare ontogenetic stages in the Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek
851 Formation (Maastrichtian), Montana, USA. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16574. doi:
852 10.1371/journal.pone.0016574
853
854 Hu, Y., J. Meng, Y. Wang, and C. Li. 2005. Large Mesozoic mammals fed on young dinosaurs.
855 Nature 433: 149-152. doi: 10.1038/nature03102.
856
857 Ibrahim, N., P.C. Sereno, D.J. Varricchio, D.M. Martill, D.B.Dutheil, D.M. Unwin, L. Baidder,
858 H.C.E. Larsson, S. Zouhri, and A. Kaoukaya. 2020. Geology and paleontology of the Upper
859 Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco. ZooKeys 928: 1-216. doi:
860 10.3987/zookeys.928.47517.
38 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 39 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
861
862 Imansyah, M.J., T.S. Jessop, C. Ciofi, and Z. Akbar. 2008. Ontogenetic differences in the spatial
863 ecology of immature Komodo dragons. Journal of Zoology 274: 107-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-
864 7998.2007.00368.x.
865
866 Ji, Q. S. Ji, and L. Zhang. 2009. First large tyrannosauroid theropod from the Early Cretaceous
867 Jehol Biota in northeastern China. Geological Bulletin of China 28: 1369-1374. Available from
868 https://web.archive.org/web/20181001133033/http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/1225428/37576846
869 9/name/20091001.pdf [Accessed on 13 September 2020].
870
871 Lamanna, M.C., G.A. Casal, R.D.F. Martínez,Draft and L.M. Ibiricu. 2020. Megaraptorid (Theropoda:
872 Tetanurae) partial skeletons from the Upper Cretaceous Bajo Barreal Formation of central
873 Patagonia, Argentina: implications for the evolution of large body size in Gondwanan
874 megaraptorans. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 86: 255-294. doi: 10.2992/007.086.0302.
875
876 Larson, D.W., and P.J. Currie. 2013. Multivariate analyses of small theropod dinosaur teeth and
877 implications for paleoecological turnover through time. PLoS ONE 8(1): e54329. doi:
878 10.1371/journal.pone.0054329
879
880 Larson, P. 2013. The case for Nanotyrannus. In Tyrannosaurid Paleobiology. Edited by J.M.
881 Parrish, R.E. Molnar, and P.J. Currie. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana. pp. 15-53.
882
39 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 40 of 91
883 Lee, A.H., and S. Werning. 2008. Sexual maturity in growing dinosaurs does not fit reptilian
884 growth models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 582-587. doi:
885 10.1073/pnas.0708903105.
886
887 Li, D., M.A. Norell, K.-Q. Gao, N.D. Smith, and P.J. Makovicky. 2010. A longirostrine
888 tyrannosauroid from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277:
889 183-190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0249.
890
891 Li, K., J. Liu, C. Yang, and F. Hu. 2011. Dinosaur assemblages from the Middle Jurassic
892 Shaximiao Formation and Chuanjie Formation in the Sichuan-Yunnan Basin, China. Volumina
893 Jurassica 9: 21-42. Available from https://vjs.pgi.gov.pl/article/view/26567Draft [Accessed on 13
894 September 2020].
895
896 Loewen, M.A., R.B. Irmis, J.J.W. Sertich, P.J. Currie, S.D. Sampson. 2013. Tyrant Dinosaur
897 Evolution Tracks the Rise and Fall of Late Cretaceous Oceans. PLoS ONE 8(11): e79420. doi:
898 10.1371/journal.pone.0079420
899
900 Longrich, N.R., and P.J. Currie. 2009. A microraptorine (Dinosauria-Dromaeosauridae) from the
901 Late Cretaceous of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 5002-
902 5007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811664106.
903
904 Lucas, S.G., R.M. Sullivan, A.J. Lichtig, S.G. Dalman, and S.E. Jasinski. 2016. Late Cretaceous
905 dinosaur biogeography and endemism in the Western Interior basin: a critical re-evaluation. New
40 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 41 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
906 Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 71: 195-213. Available from
907 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asher_Lichtig/publication/303936024_Late_Cretaceous_di
908 nosaur_biogeography_and_endemism_in_the_Western_Interior_basin_North_America_A_critic
909 al_re-evaluation/links/575ef2b708aec91374b42caa/Late-Cretaceous-dinosaur-biogeography-and-
910 endemism-in-the-Western-Interior-basin-North-America-A-critical-re-evaluation.pdf [Accessed
911 29 December 2020].
912
913 Lyson, T.R., and N.R. Longrich. 2011. Spatial niche partitioning in dinosaurs from the Late
914 Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278: 1158-
915 1164. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1444.
916 Draft
917 Mallon, J.C. 2019. Competition structured a Late Cretaceous megaherbivorous dinosaur
918 assemblage. Scientific Reports 9: 15447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51709-5.
919
920 Mallon, J.C., D.C. Evans, M.J. Ryan, and J.S. Anderson. 2012. Megaherbivorous dinosaur
921 turnover in the Dinosaur Park Formation (upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada.
922 Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 350-352: 124-138. doi:
923 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.06.024.
924
925 Marsh, A.D., and W.G. Parker. 2020. New dinosauromorph specimens from Petrified Forest
926 National Park and a global biostratigraphic review of Triassic dinosauromorph body fossils.
927 PaleoBios 37: ucmp_paleobios_50859. Available from
928 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/01w536hs [Accessed on 28 December 2020].
41 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 42 of 91
929
930 Mazzetta, G.V., P, Christiansen, and R.A. Fariña. 2004. Giants and bizarres: body size of some
931 southern South American Cretaceous dinosaurs. Historical Biology 16: 71-83. doi:
932 10.1080/08912960410001715132.
933
934 Meers, M.B. 2002. Maximum bite force and prey size of Tyrannosaurus rex and their
935 relationships to the inference of feeding behavior. Historical Biology 16: 1-12. Doi:
936 10.1080/0891296021000050755.
937
938 Mhyrvold, N.P. 2016. Dinosaur Metabolism and the Allometry of Maximum Growth Rate. PLoS
939 ONE 11(11): e0163205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163205.Draft
940
941 Motta, M.J., A.M. Aranciaga Rolando, S. Rozadilla, F.E. Agnolín, N.R. Chimento, F.B. Egli,
942 and F.E. Novas. 2016. New theropod fauna from the Upper Cretaceous (Hunicul Formation) of
943 Northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science
944 Bulletin 71: 231-253. Available from
945 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sebastian_Rozadilla/publication/304013683_NEW_THER
946 OPOD_FAUNA_FROM_THE_UPPER_CRETACEOUS_HUINCUL_FORMATION_OF_NOR
947 THWESTERN_PATAGONIA_ARGENTINA/links/5762fe8208ae192f513e3db2/NEW-
948 THEROPOD-FAUNA-FROM-THE-UPPER-CRETACEOUS-HUINCUL-FORMATION-OF-
949 NORTHWESTERN-PATAGONIA-ARGENTINA.pdf [Accessed 29 December 2020].
950
42 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 43 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
951 Müller, R.T. 2020. A new theropod dinosaur from a peculiar Late Triassic assemblage of
952 southern Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences in press. doi:
953 10.1016/j.jsames.2020.103026.
954
955 Naish, D.M., S. Hutt, and D.M. Martill. 2001. Saurischian dinosaurs 2: theropods.
956 Palaeontological Association Field Guide to Fossils 10: 242-309.
957
958 Nesbitt, S.J., R.K. Denton, Jr., M.A. Loewen, S.L. Brusatte, N.D. Smith, A.H. Turner, J.I.
959 Kirkland, A.T. McDonald, and D.G. Wolfe. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 892-899. doi:
960 10.1038/s41559-019-0888-0.
961 Draft
962 Olsen, P.E., D.V. Kent, H.-D. Sues, C. Koeberl, H. Huber, A. Montanari, E.C. Rainforth, S.J.
963 Fowell, M J. Szajna, and B.W. Hartline. 2002. Ascent of dinosaurs linked to an iridium anomaly
964 at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Science 296: 1305-1307. doi: 10.1126/science.1065522.
965
966 Osmólska, H. 1996. An unusual theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Nemegt Formation
967 of Mongolia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 41: 1-38. Available from
968 https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app41-001.html [Accessed on 13 September 2020].
969
970 Pacheco, C., R.T. Müller, M. Langer, F.A. Pretto, L. Kerber, and S. Dias da Silva. 2019.
971 Gnathovorax cabreirai: a new early dinosaur and the origin and initial radiation of predatory
972 dinosaurs. PeerJ 7: e7963. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7963.
973
43 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 44 of 91
974 Perle, A., M.A. Norell, and J.M. Clark. 1999. A new maniraptoran Theropod-Achillobator
975 giganticus (Dromaeosauridae)-from the Upper Cretaceous of Burkhant, Mongolia. Contributions
976 of the Geology and Mineralogy Chair, National Museum of Mongolia: 1-105. Available from
977 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FtVZYSTmgXXBejYfYDKUIg-giwJXNy39/view [Accessed 29
978 December 2020].
979
980 Persons, W.S., IV, and P.J. Currie. 2016. An approach to scoring cursorial limb proportions in
981 carnivorous dinosaurs and an attempt to account for allometry. Scientific Reports 6: 19828. doi:
982 10.1038/srep19828.
983
984 Persons, W.S., IV, P.J. Currie, and G.M.Draft Erickson. 2020. An older and exceptionally large adult
985 specimen of Tyrannosaurus rex. The Anatomical Record 303: 656-672. doi: 10.1002/ar.24118.
986
987 Peterson, J.E., and K.N. Daus. 2019. Feeding traces attributable to juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex
988 offer insight into ontogenetic dietary trends. PeerJ 7: e6573. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6573.
989
990 Pol, D., J. Ramezani, K. Gomez, J.L. Carballido, A. Paulina Carabajal, O.W.M. Rauhut, I.H.
991 Escapa, and N.R. Cúneo. 2020. Extinction of herbivorous dinosaurs linked to Early Jurassic
992 global warming event. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 287: 20202310. doi:
993 10.1098/rspb.2020.2310.
994
44 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 45 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
995 Porfiri, J.D., R.D. Juárez Valieri, D.D.D. Santos, and M.C. Lamanna. 2018. A new megaraptoran
996 theropod dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Bajo de la Carpa Formation of northwestern
997 Patagonia. Cretaceous Research 89: 302-319. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2019.03.014.
998
999 Purwandana, D., A. Ariefiandy, M.J. Imansyah, A. Seno, C. Ciofi, M. Letnic, and T.S. Jessop.
1000 2016. Ecological allometries and niche use dynamics across Komodo dragon ontogeny. The
1001 Science of Nature 103: 27. doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1351-6.
1002
1003 Radloff, F.G.T., and J.T. Du Toit. 2004. Large predators and their prey in a southern African
1004 savanna: a predator’s size determines its prey size range. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 410-
1005 423. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x.Draft
1006
1007 Rauhut, O.W.M. 2005. Post-cranial remains of ‘coelurosaurs’ (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the
1008 Late Jurassic of Tanzania. Geological Magazine 142: 97-107. doi:
1009 10.1017/S0016756804000330.
1010
1011 Rauhut, O.W.M. 2011. Theropod dinosaurs from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru. Special Papers
1012 in Palaeontology 86: 195-239. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01084.x.
1013
1014 Root, R.B. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecological
1015 Monographs 37: 317-350. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1942327 [Accessed 13
1016 September 2020].
1017
45 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 46 of 91
1018 Rozhdestvensky, A.K. 1965. [Growth changes in Asian dinosaurs and some problems of their
1019 taxonomy.] Paleontologičeskij žhurnal 3: 95-109. [in Russian].
1020
1021 Russell, D.A. 1970. Tyrannosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of Western Canada. National
1022 Museum of Natural Sciences Publications in Palaeontology 1: 1-32.
1023
1024 Sampson, S.D., M.A. Loewen, A.A. Farke, E.M. Roberts, C.A. Forster, J.A. Smith, and A.L.
1025 Titus. 2010. New horned dinosaurs from Utah provide evidence for intracontinental dinosaur
1026 endemism. PLoS ONE 5(9): e12292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012292.
1027
1028 Sander, P.M., A. Christian, M. Clauss, R.Draft Fechner, C.T. Gee, E.-M. Griebler, H.-C. Gunga, J.
1029 Hummel, H. Mallison, S.F. Perry, H. Preuschoft, O.W.M. Rauhut, K. Remes, T. Tütken, O.
1030 Wings, and U. Witzel. 2010. Biology of the sauropod dinosaurs: the evolution of gigantism.
1031 Biological Reviews 86: 117-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00137.x.
1032
1033 Sellés, A.G., A. Blanco, B. Vila, J. Marmi, F.J. López-Soriano, S. Llácer, J. Frigola, M. Canals,
1034 and À. Galobart. A small Cretaceous crocodyliform in a dinosaur nesting ground and the origins
1035 of sebecids. Scientific Reports 10: 15293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71975-y.
1036
1037 Sereno, P.C. 1999. The evolution of dinosaurs. Science 284: 2137-2147. doi:
1038 10.1126/science.284.5423.2137.
1039
46 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 47 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1040 Snively, E., D.M. Henderson, and D.S. Phillips. 2006. Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid
1041 dinosaurs: implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics. Acta Palaeontologica
1042 Polonica 51: 435-454. Available from https://app.pan.pl/archive/published/app51/app51-435.pdf
1043 [Accessed 13 September 2020].
1044
1045 Snively, E., H. O'Brien, D.M. Henderson, H. Mallison, L. Surring, M.E. Burns, T.R. Holtz, Jr.,
1046 A.P. Russell, L.M. Witmer, P.J. Currie, S.A. Hartman & J.R. Cotton. 2019. Lower rotational
1047 inertia and larger leg muscles indicate more rapid turns in tyrannosaurids than in other large
1048 theropods. PeerJ 7: e6432. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6432.
1049
1050 Tanaka, K., O.U. Anvarov, A. Ahmedshaev,Draft and Y. Kobayashi. 2020 A large neovenatorid
1051 (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous Bissekty Formation (Turonian), Uzbekistan.
1052 80th Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Abstract Volume: 265. Available
1053 from http://vertpaleo.org/GlobalPDFS/SVP2020_FINAL-Abstract-Book_10_08_2020.aspx
1054 [Accessed 29 December 2020].
1055
1056 Taylor, J.A. 1979. The foods and feeding habits of subadult Crocodylus prorosus Schneider in
1057 northern Australia. Wildlife Research 6: 347-359. doi: 10.1071/WR9790347.
1058
1059 Terrill, D.F., C.M. Henderson, and J.S. Anderson. 2020. New application of strontium isotopes
1060 reveals evidence of limited migratory behaviour in Late Cretaceous hadrosaurs. Biology Letters
1061 16: 20190930. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0930.
1062
47 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 48 of 91
1063 Therrien, F., D. Zelenitsky, J. Voris, and K. Tanaka. 2020. Mandibular force profiles and tooth
1064 morphology in a growth series of Albertosaurus sarcophagus and Gorgosaurus libratus
1065 (Tyrannosauridae: Albertosaurinae) provide evidence for an ontogenetic dietary shift. Canadian
1066 Journal of Earth Sciences this issue.
1067
1068 Travouillon, K.J., and S. Legendre. 2009. Using cenograms to investigate gaps in mammalian
1069 body mass distributions in Australian mammals. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
1070 Palaeoecology 272: 69-84. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.11.009.
1071
1072 Torices, A., R. Wilkinson, V.M. Arbour, J.I. Ruis-Omeñaca, and P.J. Currie. 2018. Puncture-
1073 and-pull biomechanics in the teeth of predatoryDraft coelurosaurian dinosaurs. Current Biology 28:
1074 P1467-1474.E2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.042.
1075
1076 Tucker, A.D., C.J. Limpus, H.I. McCallum, and K.R. McDonald. 1996. Ontogenetic dietary
1077 partitioning by Crocodylus johnstoni during the dry season. Copeia 1996: 978-988. Available
1078 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1447661 [Accessed 13 September 2020].
1079
1080 Van Valkenburgh, B. 1988. Trophic diversity within past and present guilds of large predatory
1081 mammals. Paleobiology 14: 156-173. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2400780
1082 [Accessed 13 September 2020].
1083
48 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 49 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1084 Van Valkenburgh, B. 1994. Extinction and replacement among predatory mammals in the North
1085 American Late Eocene-Oligocene: tracking a guild over twenty million years. Historical Biology
1086 8: 1-22. doi: 10.1080/10292389409380474.
1087
1088 Van Valkenburgh, B., and F. Hertel. 1998. The decline of North American predators during the
1089 Late Pleistocene. In Quaternary Paleozoology in the Northern Hemisphere. Edited by J.J.
1090 Saunders, B.W. Styles, and G.F. Baryshnikov. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 27: 357-
1091 374. Available at
1092 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Blaire_Van_Valkenburgh/publication/284580811_The_decl
1093 ine_of_North_American_predators_during_the_late_Pleistocene/links/56702f8f08ae0d8b0cc0dc
1094 16/The-decline-of-North-American-predators-during-the-late-Pleistocene.pdfDraft [Accessed on 13
1095 September 2020].
1096
1097 Van Valkenburgh, B., and R.E. Molnar. 2002. Dinosaurian and mammalian predators compared.
1098 Paleobiology, 28: 527-543.
1099
1100 Van der Reest, A.J., and P.J. Currie. 2017. Troodontids (Theropoda) from the Dinosaur Park
1101 Formation, Alberta, with a description of a unique new taxon: implications for deinonychosaur
1102 diversity in North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 54: 919-935. doi: 10.1139/cjes-
1103 2017-0031.
1104
1105 Vanderven, E., M.E. Burns, and P.J. Currie. 2014. Histologic growth dynamic study of
1106 Edmontosaurus regalis (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from a bonebed assemblage of the Upper
49 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 50 of 91
1107 Cretaceous Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1108 51: 1023-1033. doi: 10.1139/cjes-2014.0064.
1109
1110 Vavrek, M.J., and H.C.E. Larsson. 2010. Low beta diversity of Maastrichtian dinosaurs of North
1111 America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 8265-8268. doi:
1112 10.1073/pnas.0913645107.
1113
1114 Whitlock, J.A., K.C. Trujillo, and G.M. Hanik. 2019. Assemblage-level structure in Morrison
1115 Formation dinosaurs, Western Interior, USA. Geology of the Intermountain West 5: 9-22. doi:
1116 10.31711/giw.v5.pp9-22.
1117 Draft
1118 Wick, S.L., T.M. Lehman, and A.A. Brink. 2015. A theropod tooth assemblage from the lower
1119 Aguja Formation (early Campanian) of West Texas, and the roles of small theropod and varanoid
1120 lizard mesopredators in a tropical predator guild. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
1121 Palaeoecology 418: 229-244. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.11.018.
1122
1123 Woodruff, D.C. 2019. What factors influence our reconstructions of Morrison Formation
1124 sauropod diversity? Geology of the Intermountain West 6: 93-112. doi: 10.31711/giw/v6.pp93-
1125 112.
1126
1127 Woodward, H.N., E.A. Freedman-Fowler, J.O. Farlow, and J.R. Horner. 2015. Maiasaura, a
1128 model organism for extinct vertebrate population biology: a large sample statistical assessment
1129 of growth and survivorship. Paleobiology 41: 503-527. doi: 10.1017/pab.2015.19.
50 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 51 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1130
1131 Woodward, H.N., K. Tremaine, S.A. Williams, L.E. Zanno, J.R. Horner, and N. Mhyrvold. 2020.
1132 Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports
1133 ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus. Science Advances 6: eaax6250. doi:
1134 10.1126/sciadv.aax6250.
1135
1136 Xu, X., K. Wang, K. Zhang, Q. Ma, L. Xing, C. Sullivan, D. Hu, S. Cheng, and S. Wang. 2012.
1137 A gigantic feathered dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of China. Nature 484: 92-95. doi:
1138 10.1038/nature10906.
1139
1140 Xu, X., Z. Zhou, C. Sullivan, Y. Wang, Draftand D. Ren. 2016. An updated review of the Middle-Late
1141 Jurassic Yanliao Biota: chronology, taphonomy, paleontology and paleoecology. Acta Geologica
1142 Sinica 90: 2229-2243. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.13033.
1143
1144 Zahner, M., and W. Brinkmann. 2019. A Triassic averostran-line theropod from Switzerland and
1145 the early evolution of dinosaurs. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 1146-1152. doi:
1146 10.1038/s41559-019-0941-z.
1147
1148 Zanno, L.E., and P.J. Makovicky. 2011. Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns
1149 in theropod dinosaur evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 232-237.
1150 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011924108.
1151
51 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 52 of 91
1152 Zanno, L.E., and P.J. Makovicky. 2013. Neovenatorid theropods are paex predators of the Late
1153 Cretaceous of North America. Nature Communications 4: 2827. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3827.
1154
1155 Zanno, L.E, S. Drymala, S.J. Nesbitt, and V.P. Schneider. 2015. Early crocodylomorph increases
1156 top tier predator diversity during the rise of dinosaurs. Scientific Reports 5: 9276. doi:
1157 10.1038/srep09276.
1158
1159 Zanno, L.E., R.T. Tucker, A. Canoville, H.M. Avrahami, T.A. Gates, and P.J. Makovicky. 2019.
1160 Diminutive fleet-footed tyrannosauroid narrows the 70-million-year gap in the North American
1161 fossil record. Communications Biology 2: 64. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0308-7.
1162 Draft
1163 Zhou, Z. 2014. The Jehol Biota, an Early Cretaceous terrestrial Lagerstätte: new discoveries and
1164 implications. National Science Review 1: 543-559. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwu055.
52 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 53 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1165 TABLES
1166
1167 TABLE 1. List of theropod guilds
1168
1169 Faunas within each category listed in stratigraphic order. Tyrannosauroid taxa denoted by
1170 asterisk (*). Size classes: 1 = <10 kg; 2 = 11-50 kg; 3 = 51-100 kg; 4 = 101-500 kg; 5 = 501-
1171 1000 kg; 6 = 1001-5000 kg; 7 = >5000 kg. Correlations for Western Interior Formations from
1172 Fowler (2017).
1173
1174
1175 Draft
1176 Tyrant-dominated communities
1177
1178 Hell Creek Formation, Upper (latest Maastrichtian; Montana, South Dakota, North
1179 Dakota, USA)
1180 Carnivorous Theropods:
1181 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1182 Size class 6 --
1183 Size class 5 --
1184 Size class 4 Dakotaraptor steini
1185 Size class 3 --
1186 Size class 2 Acheroraptor temertyorum, cf. Richardoestesia gilmorei, Pectinodon
1187 bakkeri
53 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 54 of 91
1188 Size class 1 --
1189 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 10 spp.
1190
1191 Hell Creek Formation, Middle (late Maastrichtian; Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota,
1192 USA)
1193 Carnivorous Theropods:
1194 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1195 Size class 6 --
1196 Size class 5 --
1197 Size class 4 --
1198 Size class 3 -- Draft
1199 Size class 2 Acheroraptor temertyorum, cf. Richardoestesia gilmorei, Pectinodon
1200 bakkeri
1201 Size class 1 --
1202 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
1203
1204 Hell Creek Formation, Lower (late Maastrichtian; Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota,
1205 USA)
1206 Carnivorous Theropods:
1207 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1208 Size class 6 --
1209 Size class 5 --
1210 Size class 4 --
54 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 55 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1211 Size class 3 --
1212 Size class 2 Acheroraptor temertyorum, cf. Richardoestesia gilmorei, Pectinodon
1213 bakkeri
1214 Size class 1 --
1215 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
1216
1217 Scollard Formation (late Maastrichtian; Alberta, Canada)
1218 Carnivorous Theropods:
1219 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1220 Size class 6 --
1221 Size class 5 -- Draft
1222 Size class 4 --
1223 Size class 3 --
1224 Size class 2 Dromaeosauridae indet., cf. Richardoestesia gilmorei, Troodontidae indet.
1225 Size class 1 --
1226 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1227
1228 Frenchman Formation (late Maastrichtian; Saskatchewan, Canada)
1229 Carnivorous Theropods:
1230 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1231 Size class 6 --
1232 Size class 5 --
1233 Size class 4 --
55 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 56 of 91
1234 Size class 3 --
1235 Size class 2 Acheroraptor sp., Troodontidae indet.
1236 Size class 1 --
1237 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 4 spp.
1238
1239 Lance Formation (late Maastrichtian; Wyoming, USA)
1240 Carnivorous Theropods:
1241 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus rex*
1242 Size class 6 --
1243 Size class 5 --
1244 Size class 4 -- Draft
1245 Size class 3 --
1246 Size class 2 Acheroraptor sp.., Richardoestesia sp., Pectinodon bakkeri
1247 Size class 1 --
1248 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
1249
1250 Naashoibito Member, Ojo Alamo Formation (late Maastrichtian; New Mexico, USA)
1251 Carnivorous Theropods:
1252 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus sp.*
1253 Size class 6 --
1254 Size class 5 --
1255 Size class 4 --
1256 Size class 3 --
56 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 57 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1257 Size class 2 Dineobellator notohesperus, Richardoestesia sp., Troodontidae indet.
1258 Size class 1 --
1259 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1260
1261 Javelina Formation (late Maastrichtian; Texas, USA)
1262 Carnivorous Theropods:
1263 Size class 7 Tyrannosaurus sp.*
1264 Size class 6 --
1265 Size class 5 --
1266 Size class 4 --
1267 Size class 3 -- Draft
1268 Size class 2 Saurornitholestinae indet., Troodontidae indet.
1269 Size class 1 --
1270 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 4 spp.
1271
1272 Nemegt Formation (early Maastrichtian; Bayankhongor, Ömnögovi, Övörkhangai,
1273 Mongolia)
1274 Carnivorous Theropods:
1275 Size class 7 --
1276 Size class 6 Tarbosaurus bataar
1277 Size class 5 --
1278 Size class 4 Alioramus altai
1279 Size class 3 Bagaraatan ostromi
57 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 58 of 91
1280 Size class 2 Adasaurus mongoliensis, Tochisaurus nemegtensis, Borogovia gracilicrus,
1281 Zanabazar junior
1282 Size class 1 --
1283 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 22 spp.
1284
1285 Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Middle (early Maastrichtian; Alberta, Canada)1
1286 Carnivorous Theropods:
1287 Size class 7 --
1288 Size class 6 Albertosaurus sarcophagus*
1289 Size class 5 --
1290 Size class 4 -- Draft
1291 Size class 3 --
1292 Size class 2 Dromaeosauridae indet., Richardoestesia sp., Troodontidae indet.
1293 Size class 1 --
1294 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1295
1296 Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Lower (late Campanian; Alberta, Canada)2
1297 Carnivorous Theropods:
1298 Size class 7 --
1299 Size class 6 Albertosaurus sarcophagus*
1300 Size class 5 --
1301 Size class 4 --
1302 Size class 3 --
58 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 59 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1303 Size class 2 Atrociraptor marshalli, Richardoestesia sp., Albertavenator curriei
1304 Size class 1 --
1305 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 10 spp.
1306
1307 De-na-zin Member, Kirtland Formation (late Campanian; New Mexico, USA)
1308 Carnivorous Theropods:
1309 Size class 7 --
1310 Size class 6 Bistahieversor sealeyi*
1311 Size class 5 --
1312 Size class 4 --
1313 Size class 3 -- Draft
1314 Size class 2 Saurornitholestes sullivani, Troodontidae indet.
1315 Size class 1 --
1316 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1317
1318 Kaiparowits Formation, Middle (late Campanian; Utah, USA)
1319 Carnivorous Theropods:
1320 Size class 7 --
1321 Size class 6 Teratophoneus curriei*
1322 Size class 5 --
1323 Size class 4 --
1324 Size class 3 Talos sampsoni
1325 Size class 2 Paronychodon indet., Richardoestesia sp.
59 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 60 of 91
1326 Size class 1 --
1327 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1328
1329 Dinosaur Park Formation, Megaherbivore Assemblage Zone 2b (late Campanian; Alberta,
1330 Canada)3
1331 Carnivorous Theropods:
1332 Size class 7 --
1333 Size class 6 Daspletosaurus sp.*
1334 Size class 5 --
1335 Size class 4 --
1336 Size class 3 Latenivenatrix mcmasteraeDraft
1337 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Richardoestesia sp.
1338 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1339 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 9 spp.
1340
1341 Dinosaur Park Formation, Megaherbivore Assemblage Zone 2a (late Campanian; Alberta,
1342 Canada)3
1343 Carnivorous Theropods:
1344 Size class 7 --
1345 Size class 6 Gorgosaurus libratus*, Daspletosaurus sp.*
1346 Size class 5 --
1347 Size class 4 --
1348 Size class 3 Latenivenatrix mcmasterae
60 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 61 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1349 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Richardoestesia gilmorei
1350 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1351 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1352
1353 Kaiparowits Formation, Lower (late Campanian; Utah, USA)
1354 Carnivorous Theropods:
1355 Size class 7 --
1356 Size class 6 Teratophoneus curriei*
1357 Size class 5 --
1358 Size class 4 --
1359 Size class 3 Talos sampsoni Draft
1360 Size class 2 Paronychodon indet., Richardoestesia sp.
1361 Size class 1 --
1362 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 3 spp.
1363
1364 Dinosaur Park Formation, Megaherbivore Assemblage Zone 1b (late Campanian; Alberta,
1365 Canada)3
1366 Carnivorous Theropods:
1367 Size class 7 --
1368 Size class 6 Gorgosaurus libratus*, Daspletosaurus sp.*
1369 Size class 5 --
1370 Size class 4 --
1371 Size class 3 Latenivenatrix mcmasterae
61 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 62 of 91
1372 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Saurornitholestes langstoni, Richardoestesia
1373 gilmorei, Stenonychosaurus inequalis
1374 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1375 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 17 spp.
1376
1377 Dinosaur Park Formation, Megaherbivore Assemblage Zone 1a (late Campanian; Alberta,
1378 Canada)3
1379 Carnivorous Theropods:
1380 Size class 7 --
1381 Size class 6 Gorgosaurus libratus*
1382 Size class 5 -- Draft
1383 Size class 4 --
1384 Size class 3 Latenivenatrix mcmasterae
1385 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Saurornitholestes langstoni, Richardoestesia
1386 gilmorei, Stenonychosaurus inequalis
1387 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1388 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 16 spp.
1389
1390 Two Medicine Formation, Upper (middle Campanian; Montana, USA)
1391 Carnivorous Theropods:
1392 Size class 7 --
1393 Size class 6 Daspletosaurus horneri*, Gorgosaurus sp.*
1394 Size class 5 --
62 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 63 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1395 Size class 4 --
1396 Size class 3 --
1397 Size class 2 Saurornitholestes sp., Richardoestesia sp., Troodon sp.
1398 Size class 1 Bambiraptor feinbergorum
1399 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 10 spp.
1400
1401 Judith River Formation (middle Campanian; Montana, USA)
1402 Carnivorous Theropods:
1403 Size class 7 --
1404 Size class 6 Tyrannosauridae indet.*.
1405 Size class 5 -- Draft
1406 Size class 4 --
1407 Size class 3 --
1408 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Saurornitholestes sp., Troodon formosus
1409 Size class 1 --
1410 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 6 spp.
1411
1412 Oldman Formation, Upper (middle Campanian; Alberta, Canada)
1413 Carnivorous Theropods:
1414 Size class 7 --
1415 Size class 6 Daspletosaurus torosus*
1416 Size class 5 --
1417 Size class 4 --
63 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 64 of 91
1418 Size class 3 --
1419 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Saurornitholestes langstoni, Richardoestesia
1420 sp., Troodontidae indet.
1421 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1422 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 13 spp.
1423
1424 Oldman Formation, Lower (middle Campanian; Alberta, Canada)
1425 Carnivorous Theropods:
1426 Size class 7 --
1427 Size class 6 Daspletosaurus torosus*
1428 Size class 5 -- Draft
1429 Size class 4 --
1430 Size class 3 --
1431 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Saurornitholestes langstoni, Richardoestesia
1432 sp., Troodontidae indet.
1433 Size class 1 Hesperonychus elizabethae
1434 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 2 spp.
1435
1436 Two Medicine Formation, Lower (middle Campanian; Montana, USA)
1437 Carnivorous Theropods:
1438 Size class 7 --
1439 Size class 6 Tyrannosauridae indet.*
1440 Size class 5 --
64 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 65 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1441 Size class 4 --
1442 Size class 3 --
1443 Size class 2 Dromaeosaurus sp., Saurornitholestes sp.
1444 Size class 1 --
1445 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 4 spp.
1446
1447 Hunter Wash Member, Kirtland Formation (middle Campanian; New Mexico, USA)
1448 Carnivorous Theropods:
1449 Size class 7 --
1450 Size class 6 Bistahieversor sealeyi*
1451 Size class 5 -- Draft
1452 Size class 4 --
1453 Size class 3 --
1454 Size class 2 Dromaeosauridae indet., Troodontidae indet.
1455 Size class 1 --
1456 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 5 spp.
1457
1458 Fruitland Formation (middle Campanian; New Mexico, USA)
1459 Carnivorous Theropods:
1460 Size class 7 --
1461 Size class 6 Tyrannosauridae indet*
1462 Size class 5 --
1463 Size class 4 --
65 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 66 of 91
1464 Size class 3 --
1465 Size class 2 Dromaeosauridae indet., Troodontidae indet.
1466 Size class 1 --
1467 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 4 spp.
1468
1469 Aguja Formation (middle Campanian; Texas, USA)
1470 Carnivorous Theropods:
1471 Size class 7 --
1472 Size class 6 Tyrannosauridae indet*
1473 Size class 5 --
1474 Size class 4 -- Draft
1475 Size class 3 --
1476 Size class 2 cf. Dromaeosaurus sp., Richardoestesia sp., Troodontidae indet.
1477 Size class 1 --
1478 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1479
1480 Djadochta Formation (early Campanian; Ömnögovi, Mongolia)
1481 Carnivorous Theropods:
1482 Size class 7 --
1483 Size class 6 --
1484 Size class 5 Tyrannosauridae indet.*
1485 Size class 4 --
1486 Size class 3 --
66 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 67 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1487 Size class 2 Velociraptor mongoliensis, Tsaagan mangas, Gobivenator mongoliensis,
1488 Saurornitholestes mongoliensis, Byronosaurus jaffei
1489 Size class 1 Archaeornithoides deinosauriscus, Mahakala omnogovae, Almas ukhaa
1490 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 15 spp.
1491
1492 Iren Dabasu Formation (Santonian; Nei Mongol, China)
1493 Carnivorous Theropods:
1494 Size class 7 --
1495 Size class 6 --
1496 Size class 5 Alectrosaurus olseni*
1497 Size class 4 -- Draft
1498 Size class 3 --
1499 Size class 2 Velociraptorinae indet., Troodontidae indet.
1500 Size class 1 --
1501 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1502
1503 Bayan Shireh Formation, Upper (late Turonian-late Santonian; Dornogovi, Ömnögovi,
1504 Mongolia)
1505 Carnivorous Theropods:
1506 Size class 7 --
1507 Size class 6 --
1508 Size class 5 cf. Alectrosaurus*, Achillobator giganticus
1509 Size class 4 --
67 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 68 of 91
1510 Size class 3 --
1511 Size class 2 Velociraptorinae indet.
1512 Size class 1 --
1513 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1514
1515 Non-tyrant-dominated communities
1516 Lameta Formation (late Maastrichtian; Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, India)
1517 Carnivorous Theropods:
1518 Size class 7 --
1519 Size class 6 Indosaurus matleyi, Rajasaurus narmadensis, Rahiolisaurus gujaratensis
1520 Size class 5 -- Draft
1521 Size class 4 --
1522 Size class 3 --
1523 Size class 2 Laevisuchus indicus
1524 Size class 1 --
1525 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 5 spp.
1526
1527 Maevarano Formation (Maastrichtian; Mahajanga, Madagascar)
1528 Carnivorous Theropods:
1529 Size class 7 --
1530 Size class 6 --
1531 Size class 5 Majungasaurus crenatissimus
1532 Size class 4 --
68 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 69 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1533 Size class 3 --
1534 Size class 2 Masiakasaurus knopfleri
1535 Size class 1 Rahonavis ostromi
1536 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 3 spp.
1537
1538 Allen Formation (middle Campanian-early Maastrichtian; Rio Negro, Neuquèn, La
1539 Pampa, Argentina)
1540 Carnivorous Theropods:
1541 Size class 7 --
1542 Size class 6 --
1543 Size class 5 -- Draft
1544 Size class 4 Quilmesaurus curriei, Austroraptor cabazai
1545 Size class 3 Niebla antiqua
1546 Size class 2 --
1547 Size class 1 --
1548 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
1549
1550 Anacleto Formation (late Santonian-early Campanian; Mendoza, Rio Negro, Neuquèn,
1551 Argentina)
1552 Carnivorous Theropods:
1553 Size class 7 --
1554 Size class 6 Abelisaurus comahuensis, Aerosteon riocoloradensis
1555 Size class 5 Aucasaurus garriodi
69 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 70 of 91
1556 Size class 4 --
1557 Size class 3 --
1558 Size class 2 --
1559 Size class 1 --
1560 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 5 spp.
1561
1562 Bajo de la Carpa Formation (middle-late Santonian; Rio Negro, Neuquèn, Argentina)
1563 Carnivorous Theropods:
1564 Size class 7 --
1565 Size class 6 Tratayenia rosalesi
1566 Size class 5 Viavenator exxoniDraft
1567 Size class 4 --
1568 Size class 3 --
1569 Size class 2 Velocisaurus unicus
1570 Size class 1 --
1571 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1572
1573 Portezuelo Formation (late Turonian-early Coniacian; Mendoza, Rio Negro, Neuquèn,
1574 Argentina)
1575 Carnivorous Theropods:
1576 Size class 7 --
1577 Size class 6 Megaraptor namunhuaiquii
1578 Size class 5 --
70 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 71 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1579 Size class 4 --
1580 Size class 3 Unenlagia comahuensis
1581 Size class 2 Neuquenraptor argentinus
1582 Size class 1 Pamparaptor micros
1583 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 6 spp.
1584
1585 Bissekty Formation (middle-late Turonian; Uzbekistan)
1586 Carnivorous Theropods:
1587 Size class 7 --
1588 Size class 6 Unnamed carcharodontosaurid4
1589 Size class 5 Timurlengia euoticaDraft*
1590 Size class 4 --
1591 Size class 3 --
1592 Size class 2 Itemirus medullarius, Euronychodon asiaticus, Urbacodon sp.
1593 Size class 1 --
1594 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1595
1596 Bajo Barreal Formation (middle Cenomanian-Turonian; Chubut, Santa Cruz, Argentina)
1597 Carnivorous Theropods:
1598 Size class 7 --
1599 Size class 6 Xenotarsosaurus bonapartei, Carcharodontosauridae indet.,
1600 Megaraptoridae indet.
1601 Size class 5 --
71 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 72 of 91
1602 Size class 4 --
1603 Size class 3 --
1604 Size class 2 Aniksosaurus darwini, Dromaeosauridae indet.
1605 Size class 1 --
1606 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 6 spp.
1607
1608 Huincul Formation (late Cenomanian; Mendoza, Rio Negro, Neuquèn, Argentina)
1609 Carnivorous Theropods:
1610 Size class 7 Mapusaurus rosae
1611 Size class 6 Skorpiovenator bustingorryi, Taurovenator violantei
1612 Size class 5 Ilokelesia aguadagrandensis,Draft Gualicho shinyae, Aoniraptor liberatem
1613 Size class 4 Tralkasaurus cuyi
1614 Size class 3 --
1615 Size class 2 --
1616 Size class 1 Overoraptor chimentoi
1617 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1618
1619 Candeleros Formation (early Cenomanian; Mendoza, Rio Negro, Neuquèn, Argentina)
1620 Carnivorous Theropods:
1621 Size class 7 Giganotosaurus carolinii
1622 Size class 6 Ekrixinatosaurus novasi
1623 Size class 5 --
1624 Size class 4 --
72 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 73 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1625 Size class 3 --
1626 Size class 2 Bicentenaria argentina, Buitreraptor gonzalezorum
1627 Size class 1 --
1628 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 5 spp.
1629
1630 Bahariya Formation (early Cenomanian; Western Desert, Egypt)
1631 Carnivorous Theropods:
1632 Size class 7 Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, Bahariasaurus
1633 saharicus
1634 Size class 6 Deltadromeus agilis
1635 Size class 5 Rugops sp. Draft
1636 Size class 4 --
1637 Size class 3 --
1638 Size class 2 Dromaeosauridae indet.
1639 Size class 1 --
1640 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 3 spp.
1641
1642 Aoufous Formation (early Cenomanian; Errachidia, Morocco)
1643 Carnivorous Theropods:
1644 Size class 7 Spinosaurus cf. S. aegyptiacus, Sigilmassasasaurus brevicollis (?=
1645 Spinosaurus), Carcharodontosaurus saharicus
1646 Size class 6 Sauroniops pachytholus, Deltadromeus agilis
1647 Size class 5 Rugops sp.
73 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 74 of 91
1648 Size class 4 --
1649 Size class 3 --
1650 Size class 2 Noasauridae indet., Dromaeosauridae indet.
1651 Size class 1 --
1652 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 3 spp.
1653
1654 Echkar Formation (late Albian-early Cenomanian; Agadez, Niger)
1655 Carnivorous Theropods:
1656 Size class 7 Spinosaurus sp., Carcharodontosaurus iguidiensis, Bahariasaurus sp.
1657 Size class 6 --
1658 Size class 5 Rugops primus Draft
1659 Size class 4 --
1660 Size class 3 --
1661 Size class 2 --
1662 Size class 1 --
1663 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 2 spp.
1664
1665 Mussentuchit Member, Cedar Mountain Formation (early Cenomanian; Utah, USA)
1666 Carnivorous Theropods:
1667 Size class 7 --
1668 Size class 6 Siats meekerorum
1669 Size class 5 --
1670 Size class 4 --
74 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 75 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1671 Size class 3 Moros intrepidus*, Dromaeosauridae indet.
1672 Size class 2 cf. Richardoestesia, Troodontidae indet.
1673 Size class 1 --
1674 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 7 spp.
1675
1676 Elrhaz Formation (late Aptian-early Albian; Niger)
1677 Carnivorous Theropods:
1678 Size class 7 --
1679 Size class 6 Suchomimus tenerensis, Eocarcharia dinops
1680 Size class 5 Kryptops palaios
1681 Size class 4 -- Draft
1682 Size class 3 --
1683 Size class 2 Afromimus tenerensis
1684 Size class 1 --
1685 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 5 spp.
1686
1687 Cloverly Formation (Aptian-Albian; Wyoming, Montana, USA)
1688 Carnivorous Theropods:
1689 Size class 7 --
1690 Size class 6 Acrocanthosaurus sp.
1691 Size class 5 --
1692 Size class 4 Tyrannosauroidea indet.*
1693 Size class 3 Deinonychus antirrhopus
75 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 76 of 91
1694 Size class 2 --
1695 Size class 1 --
1696 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1697
1698 Yellow Cat & Poison Strip Members, Cedar Formation (Barremian-early Aptian; Utah,
1699 USA)
1700 Carnivorous Theropods:
1701 Size class 7 --
1702 Size class 6 --
1703 Size class 5 Utahraptor ostrommaysi
1704 Size class 4 -- Draft
1705 Size class 3 --
1706 Size class 2 Yurgovuchia doellingi, Geminiraptor suarezorum
1707 Size class 1 --
1708 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1709
1710 Sao Khua Formation (Barremian; Thailand)
1711 Carnivorous Theropods:
1712 Size class 7 --
1713 Size class 6 Siamosaurus suteethorni
1714 Size class 5 Siamotyrannus isanensis, Phuwiangovenator yaemniyomi
1715 Size class 4 Vayuvenator nongbualamphuensis
1716 Size class 3 --
76 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 77 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1717 Size class 2 --
1718 Size class 1 Compsognathid indet.
1719 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 2 spp.
1720
1721 Wessex Formation (late Berriasian-Barremian; Dorset, Isle of Wight, UK)
1722 Carnivorous Theropods:
1723 Size class 7 --
1724 Size class 6 Baryonyx walkeri, Neovenator salierii
1725 Size class 5 Tyrannosauroidea indet.*5, Basal tetanurine5
1726 Size class 4 Eotyrannus lengi*
1727 Size class 3 Thecocoelurus daviesiDraft
1728 Size class 2 Aristosuchus pussilis, Calamosaurus foxi, Dromaeosauridae indet.
1729 Size class 1 Ornithodesmus cluniculus, Yaverlandia bitholus
1730 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 10 spp.
1731
1732 Upper Dinosaur Member, Tendaguru Formation (Tithonian; Lindi, Tanzania)
1733 Carnivorous Theropods:
1734 Size class 7 --
1735 Size class 6 Ostafrikasaurus crassiserratus, Basal tetanurine6
1736 Size class 5 Basal ceratosaur6
1737 Size class 4 --
1738 Size class 3 --
1739 Size class 2 --
77 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 78 of 91
1740 Size class 1 --
1741 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1742
1743 Lourinhã Formation (Kimmeridgian-Tithonian; Lourinhã, Portugal)
1744 Carnivorous Theropods:
1745 Size class 7 --
1746 Size class 6 Torvosaurus gurneyi, Allosaurus europaeus
1747 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus sp., Abelisauridae indet.
1748 Size class 4 Lourinhanosaurus antunesi
1749 Size class 3 Lusovenator santosi
1750 Size class 2 Aviatyrannis jurassica,Draft cf. Richardoestesia
1751 Size class 1 --
1752 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 13 spp.
1753
1754 Morrison Formation, Zone 6 (early Tithonian; Western Interior, USA)7
1755 Carnivorous Theropods:
1756 Size class 7 --
1757 Size class 6 Allosaurus fragilis
1758 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus nasicornis
1759 Size class 4 --
1760 Size class 3 --
1761 Size class 2 Koparion douglassi
1762 Size class 1 --
78 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 79 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1763 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1764
1765 Morrison Formation, Zone 5 (late Kimmeridgian-early TIthonian; Western Interior,
1766 USA)7
1767 Carnivorous Theropods:
1768 Size class 7 Saurophaganax maximus
1769 Size class 6 Torvosaurus tanneri, Allosaurus fragilis
1770 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus nasicornis
1771 Size class 4 Marshosaurus bicentissimus
1772 Size class 3 Stokesosaurus clevelandi*
1773 Size class 2 Coelurus fragilis*Draft
1774 Size class 1 --
1775 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 9 spp.
1776
1777 Middle Dinosaur Member, Tendaguru Formation (late Kimmeridgian; Lindi, Tanzania)
1778 Carnivorous Theropods:
1779 Size class 7 --
1780 Size class 6 Veterupristatisaurus milneri
1781 Size class 5 Basal ceratosaur6
1782 Size class 4 --
1783 Size class 3 --
1784 Size class 2 Abelisauroid2, Basal tetanurine2
1785 Size class 1 --
79 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 80 of 91
1786 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 8 spp.
1787
1788 Morrison Formation, Zone 4 (late Kimmeridgian; Western Interior, USA)7
1789 Carnivorous Theropods:
1790 Size class 7 --
1791 Size class 6 Torvosaurus tanneri, Allosaurus fragilis
1792 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus nasicornis
1793 Size class 4 --
1794 Size class 3 --
1795 Size class 2 --
1796 Size class 1 HesperornithoidesDraft miessleri
1797 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 13 spp.
1798
1799 Morrison Formation, Zone 3 (middle Kimmeridgian; Western Interior, USA)7
1800 Carnivorous Theropods:
1801 Size class 7 --
1802 Size class 6 Torvosaurus tanneri, Allosaurus fragilis
1803 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus nasicornis
1804 Size class 4 Marshosaurus bicentissimus
1805 Size class 3 --
1806 Size class 2 --
1807 Size class 1 --
1808 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
80 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 81 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1809
1810 Morrison Formation, Zone 2 (middle Kimmeridgian; Western Interior, USA)7
1811 Carnivorous Theropods:
1812 Size class 7 --
1813 Size class 6 Allosaurus fragilis
1814 Size class 5 Ceratosaurus nasicornis
1815 Size class 4 --
1816 Size class 3 Stokesosaurus clevelandi*
1817 Size class 2 Coelurus fragilis*, Tanycolagreus topwilsoni*, Ornitholestes hermanni
1818 Size class 1 --
1819 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 14 spp. Draft
1820
1821 Shangshaximiao Formation (?Oxfordian; Sichuan, China)
1822 Carnivorous Theropods:
1823 Size class 7 --
1824 Size class 6 Yangchuanosaurus shangyouensis
1825 Size class 5 Szechuanosaurus campi, Yangchuanosaurus hepingensis
1826 Size class 4 --
1827 Size class 3 --
1828 Size class 2 --
1829 Size class 1 --
1830 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1831
81 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 82 of 91
1832 Shishugou Formation, Upper (Callovian-Oxfordian; Xinjiang, China)
1833 Carnivorous Theropods:
1834 Size class 7 --
1835 Size class 6 --
1836 Size class 5 Sinraptor dongi
1837 Size class 4 Guanlong wucaii*
1838 Size class 3 --
1839 Size class 2 Zuolong salleei
1840 Size class 1 --
1841 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 12 spp.
1842 Draft
1843 Xiashaximiao Formation (Bajocian-Callovian; Xinjiang, China)
1844 Carnivorous Theropods:
1845 Size class 7 --
1846 Size class 6 --
1847 Size class 5 Leshansaurus qianweiensis, Yangchuanosaurus zigongensis
1848 Size class 4 Kiajiangosaurus lini, Xuanhanosaurus qilixiaensis
1849 Size class 3 Gasosaurus constructus
1850 Size class 2 Chuandongocoelurus primitivus
1851 Size class 1 --
1852 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 11 spp.
1853
1854 Cañadon Asfalto Formation (Toarcian8; Chubut, Argentina)
82 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 83 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1855 Carnivorous Theropods:
1856 Size class 7 --
1857 Size class 6 --
1858 Size class 5 Asfaltovenator vialidadi
1859 Size class 4 Eoabelisaurus mefi, Piatnitzkysaurus floresi
1860 Size class 3 Condorraptor currumili
1861 Size class 2 --
1862 Size class 1 --
1863 Non-carnivorous Dinosaurs: 3 spp.
1864
1865 Draft
1866 1The Hypacrosaurus altispinus-Saurolophus osborni Dinosaur Macrofossil Assemblage Zone of
1867 Eberth et al. (2013).
1868 2The Edmontosaurus regalis-Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis Dinosaur Macrofossil Assemblage
1869 Zone of Ebert et al. (2013).
1870 3Megaherbivore Assemblage Zones and subdivisions from Mallon et al. (2012) and Mallon
1871 (2019)
1872 4Bissekty Formation carcharodontosaurid reported in Tanaka et al. (2020).
1873 5Wessex Formation theropods after Naish et al. (2001).
1874 6Tendaguru Formation theropods after Rauhut (2005, 2011).
1875 7Morrison Formation biozonation from Foster (2003).
1876 8Toarcian age for the Cañadón Asfalto Formation from Pol et al. (2020).
1877
83 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 84 of 91
1878 FIGURE CAPTIONS
1879
1880 Fig. 1. Hypothetical hatchling albertosaurine tyrannosaurid, from Russell (1970). Reproduced by
1881 permission: Dale Russell © Canadian Museum of Nature. Femur length 100 mm. Although
1882 other researchers have estimated somewhat different proportions for these individuals (Currie
1883 2003), this reconstruction emphasizes the different morphology, and consequently different
1884 ecological role, of young tyrant dinosaurs compared to the adult stages.
1885
1886 Fig. 2. Histogram of theropod size distribution in selected tyrant-dominated guilds. Solid bars
1887 represent non-tyrant taxa; bars with diagonal pattern represent tyrannosauroids. Data from Table
1888 1. Draft
1889
1890 Fig. 3. Histogram of theropod size distribution in selected non-tyrant-dominated guilds. Solid
1891 bars represent non-tyrant taxa; bars with diagonal pattern represent tyrannosauroids. Data from
1892 Table 1.
1893
1894 Fig. 4. Box-and-whisker plot of number of missing size classes for tyrant and non-tyrant guilds.
1895 Data from Table 1. Silhouettes of Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from
1896 PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman and reproduced under CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported License: For
1897 Teratophoneus curriei: http://phylopic.org/image/ad05ef4a-3533-4b30-b1ff-3d1faf393337/
1898 Allosaurus fragilis: http://phylopic.org/image/a3fe8af3-8bcf-469a-b3d8-08bc0f071c98/
1899
84 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 85 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
1900 Fig. 5. A, Scatter plot of number of carnivorous theropod taxa against total number of dinosaur
1901 species in faunal assemblages. Crosses, tyrant-dominated faunas; open circles, non-tyrant-
1902 dominated faunas. B, Box-and-whisker plot of total number of dinosaurian species in faunal
1903 assemblages for tyrant and non-tyrant-dominated faunas. Data from Table 1. Silhouettes of
1904 Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman and
1905 reproduced under CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported License: For Teratophoneus
1906 curriei: http://phylopic.org/image/ad05ef4a-3533-4b30-b1ff-3d1faf393337/
1907 Allosaurus fragilis: http://phylopic.org/image/a3fe8af3-8bcf-469a-b3d8-08bc0f071c98/
1908
1909
1910 Fig. 6. Box-and-whisker plot of numberDraft of missing size classes in theropod guilds for
1911 dinosaurian faunas in which sauropods were present and absent. Data from Table 1. Silhouette of
1912 Camarasaurus supremus from PhyloPic.org, by Mathew Wedel and reproduced under CCA-NC-
1913 SA 3.0 Unported License: http://phylopic.org/image/7a99b167-b719-4233-946c-addf3ef1c06c/
1914
85 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 86 of 91
Draft
Fig. 1. Hypothetical hatchling albertosaurine tyrannosaurid, from Russell (1970). Reproduced by permission: Dale Russell © Canadian Museum of Nature. Femur length 100 mm. Although other researchers have estimated somewhat different proportions for these individuals (Currie 2003), this reconstruction emphasizes the different morphology, and consequently different ecological role, of young tyrant dinosaurs compared to the adult stages.
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 87 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Draft
Fig. 2. Histogram of theropod size distribution in selected tyrant-dominated guilds. Solid bars represent non- tyrant taxa; bars with diagonal pattern represent tyrannosauroids. Data from Table 1.
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 88 of 91
Draft
Fig. 3. Histogram of theropod size distribution in selected non-tyrant-dominated guilds. Solid bars represent non-tyrant taxa; bars with diagonal pattern represent tyrannosauroids. Data from Table 1.
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 89 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Draft
Fig. 4. Box-and-whisker plot of number of missing size classes for tyrant and non-tyrant guilds. Data from Table 1. Silhouettes of Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman Silhouettes of Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman and reproduced under CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported Licence: For Teratophoneus curriei: http://phylopic.org/image/ad05ef4a-3533-4b30-b1ff-3d1faf393337/ Allosaurus fragilis: http://phylopic.org/image/a3fe8af3-8bcf-469a-b3d8-08bc0f071c98/
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 90 of 91
Draft
Fig. 5. A, Scatter plot of number of carnivorous theropod taxa against total number of dinosaur species in faunal assemblages. Crosses, tyrant-dominated faunas; open circles, non-tyrant-dominated faunas. B, Box- and-whisker plot of total number of dinosaurian species in faunal assemblages for tyrant and non-tyrant- dominated faunas. Data from Table 1. Silhouettes of Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman Silhouettes of Teratophoneus curriei and Allosaurus fragilis from PhyloPic.org, by Scott Hartman and reproduced under CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported Licence: For Teratophoneus curriei: http://phylopic.org/image/ad05ef4a-3533-4b30-b1ff-3d1faf393337/ Allosaurus fragilis: http://phylopic.org/image/a3fe8af3-8bcf-469a-b3d8-08bc0f071c98/
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 91 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Draft
Fig. 6. Box-and-whisker plot of number of missing size classes in theropod guilds for dinosaurian faunas in which sauropods were present and absent. Data from Table 1. Silhouette of Camarasaurus supremus from PhyloPic.org, by Mathew Wedel and reproduced under CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported Licence: http://phylopic.org/image/7a99b167-b719-4233-946c-addf3ef1c06c/
© The Author(s) or their Institution(s)