DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy: Muting the Masculinity of God's Words

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy: Muting the Masculinity of God's Words The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy: Muting the Masculinity of God's Words Vern Poythress & Wayne Grudem Broadman and Holman Publishers Nashville, Tennessee Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 1 © 2000 by Vern S. Poythress and Wayne A. Grudem All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 0-8054-2441-5 Published by Broadman and Holman Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee Dewey Decimal Classification: 220 Subject Heading: BIBLE Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version, © copyright 1973, 1978, 1984. The versions that we quote (except the KJV) all have copyrights. We here list those that have requested that we enter a specific description. The Scripture quotations contained herein [marked NRSV] are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright, 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture [marked NIV] taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. Scripture quotation [marked (NIVI)] taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. First published in Great Britain 1979. Inclusive language version 1995, 1996. Used by permission of Hodder & Stoughton, a member of the Hodder Headline Group. All rights reserved. Scripture [marked NIrV(1995)] taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL READER’S VERSION. Copyright © 1994 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. Scriptures [marked NCV] quoted from The Holy Bible, New Century Version, copyright © 1987, 1988, 1991 by Word Publishing, Dallas, Texas 75039. Used by permission. GOD’S WORD is a copyrighted work of God’s Word to the Nations Bible Society. Quotations [marked GW] are used by permission. Copyright 1995 by God’s Word to the Nations Bible Society. All rights reserved. Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 2 Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright © 1996. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Wheaton, Illinois 60189. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Poythress, Vern S. The gender-neutral Bible controversy: muting the masculinity of God's words / Vern Poythress and Wayne Grudem. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8054-2441-5 (pb) 1. Bible—Translating. 2. Nonsexist language—Religious aspects—Christianity. 3. Bible. English—Versions. I. Grudem, Wayne A. II. Title. BS 449.P69 2000 220.5—dc21 00-04419 1 2 3 4 5 04 03 02 01 00 Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 3 To Joel Belz and James Dobson, who saw that the preservation of God's Word was at stake and stood firm Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 4 Contents Foreward by Valerie Becker Makkai, Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of Illinois-Chicago Preface Abbreviations Chapter 1: What’s Going on with Bible Translations? A. A Controversy over gender terms B. What are these new versions? C. Controversy Chapter 2: The Rise of Gender-Neutral Bible Translations A. Earlier gender-neutral Bible translations 1. An unnoticed gender-neutral translation: the ICB/NCV 2. The first major gender-neutral translation: the NRSV (1990) 3. The Contemporary English Version (CEV) (1995) B. The NIVI Controversy 1. Prominence of the NIV 2. Revising the NIV 3. Timeline of events in the controversy over the inclusive-language NIV C. Personal Observation on the Events in this Timeline 1. Public reaction 2. Why did the issue become so heated? a) The Christian public b) Christian leaders opposed to the NIVI c) Zondervan Publishing Company d) The Committee on Bible Translation e) The International Bible Society 3. What was the fundamental problem? 4. What decided the issue? 5. Clarity versus unclarity in the issues 6. The claims of truth and falsehood D. Developments since the NIV controversy: other translations Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 5 Chapter 3: The Bible: The Word of God A. All the words in Scripture are God’s words 1. The Bible claims to be God's words 2. We are convinced of the Bible’s claims to be God’s words as we read the Bible. 3. Other evidence is useful but not an ultimate foundation 4. The Words of Scripture Are Self-Attesting. 5. Objection: This Is a Circular Argument. 6. This Does Not Imply Dictation From God as the Sole Means of Communication. B. Because All the Words of Scripture Are God’s Words, to Disbelieve or Disobey Any Word of Scripture Is to Disbelieve or Disobey God. C. The Truthfulness of Scripture 1. God Cannot Lie or Speak Falsely 2. Therefore All the Words in Scripture Are Completely True and Without Error in Any Part 3. God’s Words Are the Ultimate Standard of Truth 4. Might Some New Fact Ever Contract the Bible? D. The Inerrancy of Scripture. 1. The Bible can be inerrant and still speak in the ordinary language of everyday speech. 2. The Bible can be inerrant and still include loose or free quotations 3. It is consistent with inerrancy to have unusual or uncommon grammatical constructions in the Bible. E. Written Scripture is Our Final Authority F. How Should We respond to God’s Word? 1. We should trust every detail of meaning in God’s Word 2. We should love and treasure every bit of Scripture 3. We should tremble at God’s Word 4. We should recognize that God’s Word is powerful, eternal and worthy of praise. 5. We should fill our thoughts and lives with God’s Word. G. Faithfulness to God’s Word Chapter 4: How to Translate A. Translation based on the Bible’s command B. Difficulties in translating 1. Words take different meanings 2. Sentence formation differs from language to language 3. Form and meaning 4. The theory of dynamic equivalent translation C. Complexities deliberately left aside in dynamic equivalence theory 1. Developing the theory of dynamic equivalent translation 2. Emphasis on clarity to the neglect of complexity Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 6 3. Refinements in recognizing meaning nuances D. Types of complexity 1. Limits in dictionary summaries 2. One word may combine several meanings 3. Factors that contribute to total meaning 4. Bible translators should try to capture the richness of the Bible E. Translation as maximal equivalence F. But a trustworthy translation is still possible 1. The richness and depth of the Bible 2. The richness of human language G. The tension between preserving form and explaining meaning 1. The problem of idioms 2. Other problems 3. What about paraphrases? 4. But aren’t different translations just different kinds of interpretation? H. Excursus: Analyzing linguistic complexity Chapter 5: Permissible Changes in Translating Gender-Related Terms A. Replacing “man” and “men” when the original includes women 1. Replacing “all men” with “all” or “everyone” when translating Greek pas 2. Replacing “men” with “people” when there is no masculine term in the original text 3. Replacing “men” with “people” for Greek anthrōpos (plural) 4. Replacing “a man” with “a person” when translating Greek anthrōpos (singular) in certain cases 5. Replacing “a man” with “anyone” when translating Greek tis B. Replacing “he who …” with “the one who” or “the person who” C. Replacing “sons” with “children” when translating Hebrew banîm Chapter 6: Unacceptable changes that eliminate references to men A. Removing references to males in historical passages B. Removing references to males in parables C. Removing references to males who are examples of principles D. Colorado Springs Guidelines concerning words for “father” and “son” E. Why is only the male sex indicator deleted in gender-neutral translations? Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 7 Chapter 7: Generic “He” A. What is Generic “He”? B. Changes in gender-neutral translations C. Explicit and implicated meaning D. A failure to recognize the linguistic issue at the heart of this controversy E. Distortions in meaning F. Psalm 34:20: Obscuring the New Testament fulfillment G. Anything but “he” H. Scholarly integrity I. How many verses are affected? J. The Colorado Springs Guidelines on generic “he” K. Making our decision L. The deeper issue: feminism Chapter 8: Feminist Opposition to Generic “He” A. The development of the conflict B. Egalitarianism in the culture C. Generic “he” seen as giving prominence to the male D. Generic “she” E. The “mandate” of the National Council of Churches of Christ F. The explanatory statement of the NIVI G. The explanatory statement of the NLT H. Objections Chapter 9: Arguments for Avoiding Generic “he” for the sake of Acceptability A. “Bible translations should avoid controversy where possible” B. “Bible translations need to be sensitive to women” C. “Bible translations should avoid negative connotations” 1. Some questions to help decide when to seek to avoid a connotation in English 2. Translators should not eliminate the evidence D. “Bible translations need to be updated for modern culture” 1. An analogy: “updating” the Bible’s descriptions of earth? E. “The audience today is no longer mainly men” F. “Gender-neutral Bibles are needed for evangelism” 1. The ideological clash G. “There is a need for niche translations” 1. Some problems with niche translations (constituency translations) 2. Content vs. palatability H. The slippery slope Chapter 0: Table of Contents, Abbreviations, Preface 8 Chapter 10: Other objections against Generic “He” A. Objections related to the meaning of the original text 1. “The basic meaning is still preserved” 2. “Critics are confusing form and meaning” 3. “We are just ignoring what is not ‘intended’ in the original language” B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adam L. Porter
    January 2014 Adam L. Porter Department of Religion 1120 West Lafayette Avenue Illinois College Jacksonville, IL 62650 1101 West College Avenue 269-767-8373 Jacksonville, IL 62650 [email protected] Voice: 919-245-3429 www2.ic.edu/aporter Fax: 919-245-3480 Education: Ph.D., Religious Studies, Duke University May 1999 Major Field: Judaic Studies Minor Fields: Old Testament, Art and Art History Master of Theological Studies, Harvard Divinity School May 1993 Concentration in Western Traditions Bachelor of Arts, Oberlin College May 1988 Major: Economics, Minor: Religion Dean of the Faculty, July 2014 - present Overseeing search and hiring of faculty Assessing faculty performance Associate Academic Dean, July 2013-June, 2014. Leading the team writing Illinois College’s HLC re-accreditation assurance argument Overseeing search and hiring of non-tenure track faculty, as well as meeting with them to discuss their performance Coordinate efforts to improve student retention, serve on college’s Early Intervention Group, student academic advising and progress monitoring Coordinate selecting and brining major speakers to campus as part of Convocation program Special projects and troubleshooting as assigned by the Dean of the College Teaching Experience: Professor, Illinois College, fall 2012-present Associate Professor, Illinois College, fall 2006-spring 2012 Assistant Professor, Illinois College, fall 2000-spring 2006 Courses Taught Abrahamic Religions (fall 2002, 2003, spring 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013) Ancient Near Eastern Religions (fall 2003, 2005) Art and Archaeology of the Ancient Mediterranean (spring 2003, fall 2004, 2006) Biblical Greek (AY 2004-05, AY 2008-09, AY 2010-11, spring 2012, fall 2012, spring 2013) BreakAway: Ancient Greece (spring 2008, 2010) BreakAway: Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Medieval Spain (spring 2003) BreakAway: Italy (May 2012) BreakAway: London (May 2013) BreakAway: Morocco (January 2008) BreakAway: Peru, Past and Present - Inca Trail (Spring 2009) Curriculum Vitæ A.
    [Show full text]
  • H.B. Hackett, "Alleged Anachronism in Acts 5: 36
    1848.] Litlny. From Ba'albek to the sea its direct course is nearest 55 geographical miles. It flows at first along the alluvial valley; then breaks through the southern I!purs of Lebanon by a de~p chasm for about 20 miles, much of the way over a rocky bed and with a rushing and foaming stream; and at last flows to the sea with many windings through a broad low tract of meadow land. If now for this 20 milea mcham, we assume an average fall in the mile of 100 feet, or'20oo feet in all, (which Is a very large allowance, greater indeed than the rate of descent at the Little Falls of the Mohawk,) there yet remain. of the elevation Ilt Ba'albek (8;29 English feet) no less than 1729 feet to be distributed along the rest of the course, or 85 geographical miles. This gives an average fall of very nearly 50 feet in a mile, in a course mostly along alluvial vallies. This result, therefore, goet strongly to confirm that found above in the case of the Orontes; and both together would seem to afford decisive proof, that the reported elevation of the BIlU'a must be greatly exaggerated. Let us hope that public attention may be called to the varioaa points referred to in Ihis paper; and that those who have it in their power, will speedily cause these questions to be put at rest forever. ARTICLE II. ALLEGED ANACHRONISM IN ACTS 5: 36 IN RELATION TO Tmt SEDITION OF THEUDAS. TraDlialad fi'om the German loy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts 5 Commentary
    CCBC Prayer Group Dr. Brendon Witte Acts 5:17-42 Commentary “But the high priest rose up, and all who were with him (that is, the party of the Sadducees), and filled with jealousy they arrested the apostles and put them in the public prison” (vv. 17-18). At the instigation of the presiding member over the Sanhedrin, Annas the high priest (Acts 4:6), the party of the Sadducees arrested the apostles and placed them in prison overnight. The reason for their jealousy is not explained in the text. Perhaps, the Sadducees did not like the way the people treated the apostles with greater respect, even to the point that the crowds were potentially willing to stone some of the Sadducees to rescue the apostles (Acts 5:26). Additionally, they may have been envious of the disciples’ perceived authority; the Sadducees may have feared that power was slipping from their grasp as the disciples led Jews and God-fearers toward Christ and away from the Temple. The Tabernacle, and later the Temple, of God were places of physical and spiritual healing for the Israelites. Peter in the immediately preceding passage (Acts 5:12-16) stood in the Temple precincts and offered both types of restoration apart from the Temple and her priests. This clear display of authority undermined the dominance of the priestly class and the Sadducean party to which many of the aristocratic priests belonged. Neither of these suggestions are mutually exclusive. Either or neither may be correct. The reader simply has not been told the reason for the Sadducees envy; one is left merely to speculate a reason or reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Svensk Exegetisk 81 Årsbok
    SVENSK EXEGETISK 81 ÅRSBOK På uppdrag av Svenska exegetiska sällskapet utgiven av Göran Eidevall Uppsala 2016 Svenska exegetiska sällskapet c/o Teologiska institutionen Box 511, S-751 20 UPPSALA, Sverige www.exegetiskasallskapet.se Utgivare: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Redaktionssekreterare: Tobias Hägerland –2016 ([email protected]) David Willgren 2017– ([email protected]) Recensionsansvarig: Rosmari Lillas-Schuil ([email protected]) Redaktionskommitté: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Rikard Roitto ([email protected]) Blaåenka Scheuer ([email protected]) Cecilia Wassén ([email protected]) Prenumerationspriser: Sverige: SEK 200 (studenter SEK 100) Övriga världen: SEK 300 Frakt tillkommer med SEK 50. För medlemmar i SES är frakten kostnadsfri. SEÅ beställs hos Svenska exegetiska sällskapet via hemsidan eller postadress ovan, eller hos Bokrondellen (www.bokrondellen.se). Anvisningar för medverkande åter- finns på hemsidan eller erhålls från redaktionssekreteraren. Manusstopp är 1 mars. Tidskriften är indexerad i Libris databas (www.kb.se/libris/). SEÅ may be ordered from Svenska exegetiska sällskapet either through the homepage or at the postal address above. Instructions for contributors are found on the homep- age or may be requested from the editorial secretary (david.willgren@ altutbildning.se). This periodical is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database®, published by the Ameri- can Theological Library Association, 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606; E-mail: [email protected]; WWW: https://www.atla.com/. Omslagsbild: Odysseus och sirenerna (attisk vas, ca 480–470 f.Kr., British Museum) Bildbearbetning: Marcus Lecaros © SEÅ och respektive författare ISSN 1100-2298 Uppsala 2016 Tryck: Bulls Graphics, Halmstad Innehåll Exegetiska dagen 2015/Exegetical Day 2015 Bruce Louden Agamemnon and the Hebrew Bible ......................
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2011 The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Perkins, Nancy, "The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism." (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1397. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1397 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _____________________ by Nancy Perkins December 2011 _____________________ William D. Burgess Jr., PhD, Chair Keith Green, PhD Henry Antkiewicz, PhD Keywords: Book of Enoch, Judaism, Second Temple ABSTRACT The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism by Nancy Perkins This thesis examines the ancient Jewish text the Book of Enoch, the scholarly work done on the text since its discovery in 1773, and its seminal importance to the study of ancient Jewish history. Primary sources for the thesis project are limited to Flavius Josephus and the works of the Old Testament. Modern scholars provide an abundance of secondary information.
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of John (Chapters 1 & 2)
    Second Lesson THE GOSPEL OF JOHN (CHAPTERS 1 & 2) I. WHO IS JOHN THE BAPTIST? John the Baptist was the last great prophet prior to the birth of Christ. He was a rabbi and minister who foretold the coming of the Messiah, paving the way for Christ by preparing the mind, bodies and spirits of his disciples for his arrival. Prophet Malachi in 3:1-3 prophecies of John’s coming. He is believed to have belonged to an ascetic group known as Essenes. Who were the Essenes? The Essenes were a Jewish mystical sect somewhat resembling the Pharisees living Qumran caves near the Dead Sea. They lived lives of ritual purity and separation. They originated about 100 B.C., and disappeared from history after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. The Essenes are not directly mentioned in Scripture. It has been popular among some scholars to claim that John the Baptist was an Essene. There are some similarities between John and the Essenes: 1. John was in the desert (Luke 1:80). The Essenes were in the desert. 2. Both John and the Essenes used Isaiah 40:3 to describe themselves as the voice in the wilderness. 3. The baptism (or washing) practiced by John and the Essenes required a change of heart. The Essenes as a sect of Judaism do not exist today. John’s disciples: He also drew his share of disciples. The first two peoples Andrew and John that Jesus called to follow him were first followers of John (John 1:35 - 39). Philip was probably another disciple of John the Baptist.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hail, King of the Jews” Weekly Bible Study March 10, 2013 1St in a Three-Part Series ©2013 Scott L
    “Hail, King of the Jews” Weekly Bible Study March 10, 2013 1st in a three-part series ©2013 Scott L. Engle Mark 15:1–20 (NIV) [After Jesus is tried by the Jewish council, the Sanhedrin, he is taken to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor and representative of Caesar.] Very early in the morning, the chief priests, with the elders, the teachers of the law and the whole Sanhedrin, made their plans. So they bound Jesus, led him away and handed him over to Pilate. 2 “Are you the king of the Jews?” asked Pilate. “You have said so,” Jesus replied. 3 The chief priests accused him of many things. 4 So again Pilate asked him, “Aren’t you going to answer? See how many things they are accusing you of.” 5 But Jesus still made no reply, and Pilate was amazed. 6 Now it was the custom at the festival to release a prisoner whom the people requested. 7 A man called Barabbas was in prison with the insurrectionists who had committed murder in the uprising. 8 The crowd came up and asked Pilate to do for them what he usually did. 9 “Do you want me to release to you the king of the Jews?” asked Pilate, 10 knowing it was out of self-interest that the chief priests had handed Jesus over to him. 11 But the chief priests stirred up the crowd to have Pilate release Barabbas instead. 12 “What shall I do, then, with the one you call the king of the Jews?” Pilate asked them.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Jesus of Nazareth the Predicted Messiah? a Historical-Evidential
    IS JESUS OF NAZARETH THE PREDICTED MESSIAH? A HISTORICAL-EVIDENTIAL APPROACH TO SPECIFIC OLD TESTAMENT MESSIANIC PROPHECIES AND THEIR NEW TESTAMENT FULFILLMENTS By Douglas D. Scott A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SEMINARY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy May 2017 ABSTRACT The primary purpose of this dissertation is to establish if critically acceptable historical- evidential reasons exist for believing that Jesus Christ is the direct fulfillment of the specific OT messianic texts included in the study. The study presupposes many of the conclusions of historical-critical scholarship and employs historical-evidential criteria to evaluate the evidence and attempt to establish the historical warrant for affirming such belief. Secondarily, this study seeks to find minimal facts related to these specific OT prophetic texts. To qualify as a minimal fact, two conditions must be met: (1) there must be more than adequate scholarly evidences usually consisting of several critically ascertained lines of argumentation; and (2) there must be agreement among the majority of contemporary scholars about the historicity of the event or the specific claim the minimal fact affirms. This investigation envisions the existence of three possible outcomes for each prophecy examined: (1) Jesus directly fulfilled the prophecy and sufficient historical evidence establishes the claim as probable, (2) Jesus directly fulfilled the prophecy, but the available historical evidence is insufficient to establish the claim as probable, and (3) sufficient historical evidence exists to refute the claim that Jesus directly fulfilled the prophecy. The historical-evidential approach employed by this study yields the probability of two direct fulfillments and the emergence of fifteen minimal facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Luke the Evangelist
    Luke the Evangelist Luke the Evangelist (Ancient Greek: Λουκᾶς, Loukás) 4:14 and 2 Timothy 4:11)..[4][5][6][7][8] is one of the Four Evangelists - the four authors of His earliest notice is in Paul’s Epistle to Philemon-- canonical Gospels of Jesus Christ. Luke was a native of Philemon 1:24. He is also mentioned in Colossians 4:14 the Hellenistic city of Antioch in Syria. The early church and 2Timothy 4:11, two works commonly ascribed to fathers ascribed to him authorship of both the Gospel ac- Paul. The next earliest account of Luke is in the Anti- cording to Luke and the book of Acts of the Apostles, Marcionite Prologue to the Gospel of Luke, a document which originally formed a single literary work, referred once thought to date to the 2nd century, but which has to as Luke-Acts. Prominent figures in early Christianity more recently been dated to the later 4th century. Helmut such as Jerome and Eusebius later reaffirmed his author- Koester, however, claims that the following part – the ship, although within scholarly circles, both secular and only part preserved in the original Greek – may have been religious, discussions have taken place due to the lack of composed in the late 2nd century: evidence as to the identity of the author of the works. The New Testament mentions Luke briefly a few times, Luke, was born in Antioch, by profession, and the Pauline epistle to the Colossians refers to him as was a physician.[9] He had become a disci- a doctor; thus he is thought to have been both a physician ple of the apostle Paul and later followed Paul and a disciple of Paul.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptist Traditions and Q
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey Mitherausgeber/Associate Editors Friedrich Avemarie • Judith Gundry-Volf Martin Hengel • Otfried Hofius • Hans-Josef Klauck 190 ARTI BUS Clare K. Rothschild Baptist Traditions and Q Mohr Siebeck Clare K. Rothschild, born 1964; 1986 B.A. University of California, Berkeley; 1992 M.T.S. Harvard University; 2003 Ph.D. University of Chicago; currently Assistant Professor of Theology at Lewis University, Romeoville, IL. ISBN 3-16-148791-5 ISSN 0512-1604 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2005 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer in Tübingen, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Großbuchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. For my grandfather: Alexander Bernard Komoroske 1912-2005 The dove descending breaks the air With flame of incandescent terror Of which the tongues declare The one discharge from sin and error. The only hope, or else despair Lies in the choice of pyre or pyre - To be redeemed from fire by fire. T. S. Eliot, "Little Gidding," Four Quartets Acknowledgments The foundational idea for this book arose in a three-and-a-half hour conversa- tion on a car ride from Grand Rapids, MI to Chicago, IL in February, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Is New Testament Inerrancy a New Testament Concept? a Traditional and Therefore Open- Minded Answer
    JETS 57/2 (2014) 265–80 IS NEW TESTAMENT INERRANCY A NEW TESTAMENT CONCEPT? A TRADITIONAL AND THEREFORE OPEN- MINDED ANSWER ARMIN D. BAUM* The reason I put the question this way is the simple observation that the word “inerrancy” does not play any significant role in the NT. I know of just one possible exception in the teaching of Jesus. In his discussion with the Sadducees about the resurrection of the dead, Jesus says: “You are in error (), be- cause you know neither the scriptures nor the power of God” (Matt 22:29 par. Mark 12:24, 27). In other words, the Sadducees would not have erred had they known the Scriptures which do not err, at least not in the section from Exod 3:6 and 15 which Jesus quotes. Furthermore, nowhere in the Gospels does Jesus ever say or imply that the Scriptures can contain errors. According to the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus distin- guished in his Bible between more important and less important sections,1 but he is not reported to have differentiated between biblical passages with and without di- vine authority. On the other hand, we do not have a logion in which Jesus explicitly states that his whole Bible is without error. In order to identify Jesus’ position on biblical inerrancy it is obviously not enough to do a simple word study or to rely on an argument from silence; it is necessary to ask if Jesus’ explicit understanding of his holy Scriptures was compatible with the concept of inerrancy. When it comes to the inerrancy of the NT, we are in a still more difficult po- sition.
    [Show full text]
  • Herod Agrippa I Would Be King Over the Territories Formerly Ruled by Philip and Lysanias, to Which the Tetrarchy of Antipas Would Be Added and Then Judaea and Samaria
    KING HEROD THE GREAT AND HEROD ANTIPATROS HEROD THE GREAT HEROD ANTIPAS HDT WHAT? INDEX HEROD ANTIPATROS KING HEROD 73 BCE At about this point Herod the Great was born as the 2d son of Antipater the Idumaean and Cypros, a Nabatean. “NARRATIVE HISTORY” IS FABULATION, HISTORY IS CHRONOLOGY HDT WHAT? INDEX KING HEROD HEROD ANTIPATROS 48 BCE Antipater the Idumaean sent his older son Phasael to Judaea to be governor of Jerusalem and his younger son Herod (who would come to be known as “Herod the Great”) to be governor of nearby Galilee. Cleopatra was removed from power by Theodotas and Achillas. HDT WHAT? INDEX HEROD ANTIPATROS KING HEROD “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY HDT WHAT? INDEX KING HEROD HEROD ANTIPATROS 43 BCE At about this point Lucius Munatius Plancus was directed by the Roman senate to found, at what would become the city of Lyon, a town called Lugdunum. Antipater the Idumaean granted financial support to the murderers of Julius Caesar, an act which brought chaos, and then was poisoned. Herod the Great, with the support of the Roman Army, executed his father’s poisoner. When Antigonus attempted to seize the throne from his uncle Hyrcanus, Herod the Great defeated him (without, however, managing to capture and kill him) and then, to secure for himself a claim to the throne, took Hyrcanus’s teenage niece, Mariamne (known as Mariamne I), to wife. Inconveniently, he already had a wife, named Doris, and a three-year-old son, named Antipater III — and so he banished both of them.
    [Show full text]