DOCSLIB.ORG

Generation Interconnection Queue: Interconnection Facilities Associated with Higher Queue Interconnection Requests Will Be Modeled in This Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generation Interconnection Queue: Interconnection Facilities Associated with Higher Queue Interconnection Requests Will Be Modeled in This Study Large Generator Interconnection Qualifying Facility FINAL Facilities Restudy Report Completed for (“Interconnection Customer”) Q0650 Q0651 Q0652 Q0653 Proposed Point of Interconnection Hinkle substation April 17, 2018 FINAL Facilities Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................ 1 3.0 STUDY ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................................... 1 4.0 PROPOSED POINT OF INTERCONNECTION .............................................................................. 2 5.0 SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Generating Facility ........................................................................................................... 4 Interconnection Customer to be Responsible For ..................................................... 4 Transmission Provider to be Responsible For .......................................................... 6 5.2 Echo Substation ................................................................................................................ 7 Interconnection Customer to be Responsible For ..................................................... 7 Transmission Provider to be Responsible For .......................................................... 7 5.3 Point of Interconnection – Hinkle substation ................................................................... 7 Transmission Provider to be Responsible For .......................................................... 7 5.4 Other ................................................................................................................................. 8 Interconnection Customer to be Responsible For ..................................................... 8 Transmission Provider to be Responsible For .......................................................... 8 6.0 COST ESTIMATE .................................................................................................................... 9 7.0 SCHEDULE........................................................................................................................... 11 8.0 PARTICIPATION BY AFFECTED SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 12 9.0 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 12 9.1 Appendix 1: Higher Priority Requests ........................................................................... 13 9.2 Appendix 2: Property Requirements .............................................................................. 14 April 17, 2018 Q0650-3 Page i FINAL Facilities Study Report 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT (collectively the “Interconnection Customer”) proposed interconnecting 40 MW of new generation to PacifiCorp’s (“Transmission Provider”) Hinkle substation located in Morrow County, Oregon. project (“Project”) will consist of twenty (20) 2000kW GE 2.0-116 wind turbines for a total output of 40 MW. The requested commercial operation date is October 1, 2019. Interconnection Customer will operate this generator as a Qualifying Facility as defined by the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA). The Transmission Provider has assigned the project “Q0650, Q0651, Q0652 & Q0653.” 2.0 STUDY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES The objective of the facilities study is to: complete a facilities analysis, which shall specify and estimate the cost of equipment, engineering, procurement, and construction required to address issues as outlined in the system impact study, and provide a scope of work and an estimated cost and schedule for completing the scope of work. 3.0 STUDY ASSUMPTIONS All active higher priority transmission service and/or generator interconnection requests will be considered in this study and are listed in Appendix 1. If any of these requests are withdrawn, the Transmission Provider reserves the right to restudy this request, as the results and conclusions contained within this study could significantly change. For study purposes there are two separate queues: o Transmission Service Queue: to the extent practical, all network upgrades that are required to accommodate active transmission service requests will be modeled in this study. o Generation Interconnection Queue: Interconnection Facilities associated with higher queue interconnection requests will be modeled in this study. The Interconnection Customer’s request for interconnection service in and of itself does not convey transmission service. Only a Network Customer may make a request to designate a generating resource as a Network Resource. Because the queue of higher priority transmission service requests may be different when a Network Customer requests network resource designation for this Generating Facility, the available capacity or transmission modifications, if any, necessary to deliver 100% of the Project output to network load may be significantly different. Therefore, the Interconnection Customer should regard the results of this study as informational rather than final. This study assumes the Project will be integrated into Transmission Provider’s system at the agreed upon and/or proposed Point of Interconnection (“POI”). The Interconnection Customer will construct and own any facilities required between the POI and the Project unless specifically identified by the Transmission Provider. Line reconductor or fiber underbuild required on existing poles will be assumed to follow the most direct path on the Transmission Provider’s system. If during detailed design the path must April 17, 2018 Q0650-3 Page 1 FINAL Facilities Study Report be modified it may result in additional cost and timing delays for the Interconnection Customer’s project. Under normal conditions, the Transmission Provider does not dispatch or otherwise directly control or regulate the output of generating facilities. Therefore, the need for transmission modifications, if any, which are required to deliver 100% of Project output to the Network Customer’s network load will be evaluated (i.e., no displacement of other resources in the same area). Generator tripping may be required for certain outages. All facilities will meet or exceed the minimum Western Electricity Coordinating Council (“WECC”), North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”), and Transmission Provider performance and design standards. The Q0650-Q0653 Project has been studied assuming all four interconnection requests are constructed simultaneously. Any modification to the timing or status of any of the four requests by the Interconnection Customer will require a restudy by the Transmission Provider. The Q0650-Q0653 Generating Facilities are studied based on the one-line diagrams provided by the Interconnection Customer labeled SL.01 through SL.04, dated March 30, 2015. Stated facilities include twenty General Electric 2.0-116 wind turbine generators, organized into a single 34.5 kV collector string, with four branches, and a new 34.5 kV to 69 kV fixed ratio, 25/33.3/41.7 MVA, 8% impedance transformer at the Interconnection Customer owned collector substation. For events requiring a Remedial Action Scheme (“RAS”) to trip the 40 MW output of the Q0650-Q0653 Project, the 34.5 kV feeder breaker 52-1 will be tripped. Bonneville Power Administration’s (“BPA”) 115-69 kV transformer located at McNary substation is scheduled to be replaced in the Fall of 2019 and is contingent for this Project. The Project will be interconnected through the Interconnection Facilities associated with the earlier queue projects Q0102-Q0106 and Q0145-Q0147 referred to collectively as the Echo project. This report is based on information available at the time of the study. It is the Interconnection Customer’s responsibility to check the Transmission Provider’s web site regularly for Transmission system updates at http://www.pacificorp.com/tran.html 4.0 PROPOSED POINT OF INTERCONNECTION The Interconnection Customer’s proposed Generating Facility is to be interconnected to the Transmission Provider’s 69 kV Hinkle substation through the existing, approximately 9.7 mile 69 kV transmission tie line constructed for the earlier queue projects Q0102-Q0106 and Q0145- Q0147. April 17, 2018 Q0650-3 Page 2 FINAL Facilities Study Report McNary Substation L366 A 400 0. 37 MILES Umatilla Substation 6. 17 MILES 230 kV Wallula Substation 1W27 Cold Springs Substation 36/48/60 MVA 6.7 MILES 3W120 5/6.25 MVA 4. 59 MILES 3W234 0. 67 MILES NO 3W90 3W67 0.79 MILES Hermiston Substation Point of Interconnection 3.43 MILES Hinkle Substation M R Change of ownership 69kV 9. 7 MILES Echo Substation Q102-106, Q 145-147 R 52-1 34.5 kV Q 0650 52H 52-2 M New Facilities Q0651 VS-1 4 MVAR M Q0652 VS-2 4 MVAR M Q0653 M Figure 1: System One Line Diagram April 17, 2018 Q0650-3 Page 3 FINAL Facilities Study Report 5.0 SCOPE OF WORK 5.1 Generating Facility The following outlines the design, procurement, construction, installation, and ownership of equipment at the Interconnection Customer’s Generation Facility and associated collector substation. INTERCONNECTION CUSTOMER TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR Procure all necessary permits, lands, rights of way and easements required for the construction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited
    Welcome to the latest MTA "Eye on the Future," in which we present currently funded capital projects that are planned to be advertised from September 2017 through August 2018. The "Eye" is hosted along with other information and resources about the MTA Capital Program in one convenient location. It is part of our commitment to improve business practices and we hope that it is useful to you. The MTA Capital Program is very important for the safety and reliability of the MTA transportation system and is vital for the regional economy. As described in this issue of the "Eye," the MTA is preparing to undertake 145 projects valued at approximately $4.71 billion in capital work. This work spans many areas, including civil, structural, and electrical, as well as new technologies. These projects are crucial for the reliability, growth and resiliency of the system and contribute to the regional economy. This amount of investment is projected to generate approximately $8.29 billion in economic activity for the New York region. We want to make sure you’re aware of our recently-launched web-portal: MyMTA.info. This portal enables suppliers and bidders to the MTA to search procurement opportunities and information across all MTA agencies, respond to sourcing events online, select categories for the goods and services your sell and more. Contractors and suppliers have a critical stake in the success of the Capital Program. We appreciate your interest in and support of the projects included in this issue of the "Eye," and we look forward to your participation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — MARCH, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 3 March, 2020 The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ronald Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2019 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Second Avenue Elevated, looking north from 34th The R-42s are seen at Hammels Wye on the last trip northbound from Far Rockaway-Mott Av to Inwood-207 St. Street in about 1937, pho- Marc A. Hermann photograph tographer unknown. MTA New York City Transit retired the last thusiasts joined MTA Chairman and CEO remaining R-42 subway cars from service Patrick J. Foye and NYC Transit President today, ending a 51-year run. The cars have Andy Byford riding the last R-42 in passen- been used on two dozen lines, each traveling ger service. more than seven million miles. They had a “These cars have served the MTA well as a memorable role in an iconic car-vs.-train reliable fleet over the last 50 years,” said Sal- In This Issue: chase in the classic 1971 film French Con- ly Librera, Senior Vice President, Department LIRR Main Line nection. of Subways for New York City Transit. “As Third-Track The final run followed a send-off ceremony technology advances, we’re looking to mod- at the New York Transit Museum, and was ernize our fleet of subway cars to best serve Project Update scheduled to proceed through a final trip on New Yorkers.” …Page 3 the A line from Euclid Av to Far Rockaway (Continued on page 2) to 207 St, before returning to Euclid Av to close its doors for the last time.
    [Show full text]
  • February 27, 2019 FARE and TOLL CHANGE BOOK TABLE of CONTENTS
    Fare and Toll Change Materials February 27, 2019 FARE AND TOLL CHANGE BOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS • Staff Summary and Board Resolution on 2019 Fare Increases • Attachment A Additional Material Relating to Staff Summary on 2019 Fare Increases o NYCT & Affiliates, MTABC Tariff (Redline version) o MNR Fare Change Summary and Fare Tables o LIRR Fare Change Summary and Fare Tables Attachmento B o Title VI Summary • Negative Declaration and Type II Determination • Just and Reasonable Report • Staff Summary and Board Resolution on Environmental and "Just and Reasonable" Determinations • Staff Summary and Board Resolution on Crossing Charge Increase STAFF SUMMARY Subject Date 2019 Fare Increases February 27, 2019 Department Vendor Name Chief Financial Officer Department Head Name Contract Number Robert Foran Department Head Signature Contract Manager Name Project Manager Name Table of Contents Ref # Monica Murray Board Action Internal Approvals Order To Date Approval Info Other Order Approval Order Approval 1 Chief Financial Officer 1 Board 2/27/2019 2 Legal 3 Chief of Staff Narrative Purpose: To obtain the Board’s adoption and approval of a Resolution authorizing proposed fare increases, below the rate of inflation, as set forth in Attachment A to the Resolution. Discussion: Fares and tolls are essential revenue that support the quality and quantity of service the MTA provides while helping to meet rising costs and achieve a balanced budget as required by law. For this reason, the MTA Financial Plan includes proposed increases every two years. The Proposed Financial Plan 2019-2022 presented at the July 25, 2018 Board meeting contemplates implementation of increased fares to achieve budgeted revenue targets.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Capital Project Listing Sorted by Department, Facility, Asset Category, and Plan Category ($ in Thousands) (Glossary Located on the Last Page of This Document)
    2018 Capital Project Listing Sorted by Department, Facility, Asset Category, and Plan Category ($ in thousands) (Glossary located on the last page of this document) Project Plan Asset 2018 Title Stage ID Category Category Budget DEPARTMENT: TUNNELS, BRIDGES & TERMINALS CB02 - HOLLAND TUNNEL CB02-040 REHABILITATION OF TUNNEL VENTILATION SYSTEM - MECHANICAL AND Deliver HVAC, Plumbing & Sprinklers 4 $6,581 ELECTRICAL CB02-123 REPLACEMENT OF PIER 9 AND PIER 204 Deliver Port Wharfs M4 10,042 CB02-156 REPLACEMENT OF SUPERVISORY CONTROL SYSTEM Renew Control Systems 3 966 CB02-166 REPLACEMENT OF HVAC SYSTEM AT ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE Deliver HVAC, Plumbing & Sprinklers 4 32 BUILDINGS CB02-175 REPLACEMENT OF BULKHEAD DOORS IN VENTILATION BUILDINGS Renew Buildings & Garages 3 399 CB02-180 REHABILITATION OF STAIR IN NEW YORK RIVER VENTILATION BUILDINGS Deliver Buildings & Garages 4 20 CB02-184 ENHANCEMENT OF ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM Deliver Control Systems 4 22 CB02-193 REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE AND STEEL Renew Tunnels P 422 CB02-195 REHABILITATION OF SUPPLY BLOWER PORTS Deliver Tunnels 4 4,315 CB02-202 REPLACEMENT OF TOLL COLLECTION SYSTEM Renew Control Systems 4 2,004 CB02-205 UPGRADE OF 800 MHZ SIMULCAST TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEM Deliver Control Systems M4 131 CB02-207 REHABILITATION OF BRONZE DOORS AT SPRING STREET Renew Buildings & Garages 3 1,004 CB02-213 MITIGATION OF WATER LEAKAGE AT VENTILATION DUCTS AND MID- Renew Tunnels 4 2,170 RIVER PUMP ROOM CB02-217 REPLACEMENT OF ROOF AND PARAPET AT NEW YORK EMERGENCY Renew Buildings & Garages 3 570
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Regulated PCB Transformer Data
    A B C D E F G H I J K Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Database Last Modified: 13-Sep-19 1 Number Date De-Registered/ Number Original Date Registered Remaining Company Street City State Zip Contact Name Contact Phone Latest Removal Date Transformers 2 Transformers 3 12-Jan-06 15 15 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 4 12-Jan-06 31 31 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 5 10-Apr-06 32 32 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 6 16-Dec-98 35 35 3448US Army Armor Center and Fort Knox Not Provided Fort Knox KY 40121-5000Louis Barnhart 502-624-3629 7 9-Mar-18 2 2 83 Griffith St, LLC 3333 Allen Parkway Salem NJ 08079 Harold Polk (346) 970-8909 8 21-Dec-98 1 1 AAF International 215 Central Ave. Louisville KY 40208 Ron Unthank 502-637-0221 9 21-Dec-98 1 1 AAF International 215 Central Ave. Louisville KY 40208 Ron Unthank 502-637-0221 10 26-Jan-10 12 12 Abitibi Bowater (Formerly US Alliance Coos17589 Plant Road Coosa PinesAL 35044 Brian Smith 256-378-2126 11 20-Oct-08 13 13 Acero Junction Inc. (FKA Severstal Wheelin1134 Market Street Wheeling WV 26003 Patrick J. Smith 740-283-5542 12 3-Dec-98 2 2 Acme Steel Company 13500 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting November 2020 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 11/18/2020 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 2020 Minutes from October ‘20 - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2020 - 2021 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. C&D CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Update on Signals and Train Control - Page 6 IEC Project Review on Queens Boulevard CBTC - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Culver Line CBTC - Page 15 IEC Project Review on 8th Avenue CBTC - Page 19 IEC Project Review on Bus Radio System - Page 24 5. UPDATE ON OMNY, MTA’s NEW FARE PAYMENT SYSTEM Update on OMNY - Page 28 IEC Project Review on OMNY - Page 36 IEC OMNY Appendix - Page 41 6. UPDATE ON SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Small Business Development Program - Page 44 7. UPDATE M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB PARTICIPATION on CAPITAL PROJECTS M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB Participation - Page 74 8. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 75 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE October 28, 2020 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on October 28, 2020, which included the following committees: Joint Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad Committees; New York City Transit and MTA Bus Committee; Bridges and Tunnels Committee; Finance Committee; Audit Committee; Safety Committee; Capital Program Oversight Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Appendix G. Distribution Need Analysis
    Proponent’s Environmental Assessment Estrella Substation and Paso Robles Area Reinforcement Project May 2018 Updated Appendix G. Distribution Need Analysis Proponent’s Environmental Assessment Estrella Substation and Paso Robles Area Reinforcement Project May 2018 This page intentionally left blank Proponent’s Environmental Assessment Estrella Substation and Paso Robles Area Reinforcement Project May 2018 CONTENTS I. Limitations in the Existing Distribution System ...................................................... 1 A. Reliability .................................................................................................... 1 B. Capacity ...................................................................................................... 4 II. Siting of New Distribution Substation....................................................................... 7 A. Siting Principles .......................................................................................... 7 B. Location of Expected Load Growth ............................................................ 7 C. Why Locate the New Substation within 2.2 Miles of the SR-46 230 kV Line Intersection? ........................................................................... 8 III. Timing of New Distribution Substation .................................................................. 14 A. Predictive Factors for Electrical Load Growth ......................................... 14 B. LoadSEER Forecasts ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017- 2026 Capital Project List — Renew Sorted by Department, Facility, and Program (In Thousands)
    2017- 2026 Capital Project List — Renew Sorted by Department, Facility, and Program (in thousands) 2017-2021 2022-2026 2017-2026 ProjeCt ID ProjeCt Title Stage Asset Category Spending Spending Spending TUNNELS, BRIDGES AND TERMINALS GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECOATING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR FORT CB04-223 Planning Bridges $3,900 $1,500 $5,400 WASHINGTON AVE REHABILITATION AND RECOATING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR CB04-224 Planning Bridges 4,200 1,500 5,700 AMSTERDAM AVENUE REPLACEMENT OF LIGHTING ALONG FIXTURES, FEEDERS AND Electrical Power & CB04-229 Planning 1,700 – 1,700 WIRING RAMPS Lighting Electrical Power & CB04-241 REHABILITATION OF NJ/NY HIGH TENSION ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR Planning 9,400 46,600 56,000 Lighting CB04-260 REPLACEMENT OF TOLL COLLECTION SYSTEM Construction Control Systems 55,000 – 55,000 CB04-263 REHABILITATION OF TRANS MANHATTAN EXPRESSWAY Planning Paving & Roadways 800 39,100 39,900 REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, LEAD ABATEMENT & CB04-286 Planning Bridges 5,300 7,200 12,500 PAINT FOR NEW YORK RAMPS HVAC, Plumbing & CB04-310 REPLACEMENT OF CHILLER AT TOLL HOUSES Planning 4,900 3,000 7,900 Sprinklers CB04-312 UPGRADE/REPLACEMENT OF SIGNS AND FIELD DEVICES Design Control Systems 49,000 800 49,800 Electrical Power & CB04-325 REPLACEMENT OF EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM Design 3,300 – 3,300 Lighting CB04-328 UPGRADE OF FLAG HOIST SYSTEM ACCESS Planning Bridges 1,500 – 1,500 CB04-330 REHABILITATION OF HUDSON RAMPS COMPLEX – PHASE II Planning Bridges – 3,400 3,400 REHABILITATION OF ROADWAY DECK OVER EMERGENCY
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed MTA Capital Program 2010-2014
    Proposed MTA Capital Program 2010-2014 September 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OVERVIEW 1 The MTA 2010-2014 Capital Program-- “Preserving the Transportation System’s Rich Heritage for Future Generations” INTRODUCTION 15 Investment Summary and Program Funding CORE CPRB CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 MTA NYC Transit Capital Program 25 Overview Program Plan MTA Long Island Rail Road Capital Program 53 Overview Program Plan MTA Metro-North Railroad Capital Program 77 Overview Program Plan MTA Bus Company Capital Program 101 Overview Program Plan MTA-Wide Security and Safety Capital Program 109 Overview Introduction MTA Interagency Capital Program 115 Overview Program Plan NETWORK EXPANSION: 2010-2014 MTA Capital Construction Capital Program 125 Overview Program plan MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 143 Overview Program Plan PROGRAM PROJECT LISTINGS: 2010-2014 165 Proposed 2010-2014 Capital Program (This page intentionally left blank.) Proposed 2010-2014 Capital Program THE 2010-2014 CAPITAL PROGRAM: Preserving the Transportation System’s Rich Heritage for Future Generations Introduction The MTA’s network of subways, buses and railroads move 2.6 billion New Yorkers a year, about one in every three users of mass transit in the United States and two thirds of the nation’s rail riders. MTA bridges and tunnels carry nearly 300 million vehicles annually—more than any bridge and tunnel authority in the nation. This vast transportation network –North America’s largest— serves a population of 14.5 million people in the 5,000 square–mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State and Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Supply Collection Accession 2006.39
    The New York Transit Museum Archives 130 Livingston St. • Brooklyn, NY 11201-5106 Phone (718) 694-1068 • Fax (718) 694-5487 Finding Aid for POWER SUPPLY COLLECTION ACCESSION 2006.39 SUMMARY INFORMATION CREATOR: Manhattan Railway, Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation, and Independent System TITLE: Power Supply Collection INCLUSIVE DATES: 1898-1998 BULK DATES: 1901-1920, 1948-1980 QUANTITY: 39.1 linear feet ABSTRACT: The Power Supply Collection contains records and photographs of the construction and maintenance of the electrical power generation and distribution systems for the New York City subway, from 1898 through 1998. The collection primarily documents the building and modernizing of electrical substations and powerhouses of the Manhattan Railway Company, Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation, and the Independent System. Updated: 11/20/2007 New York Transit Museum Archives Power Supply Collection Accession 2006.39 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: There are no restrictions on this collection. COPYRIGHT: New York Transit Museum PREFERRED CITATION: Courtesy of the New York Transit Museum PROCESSING INFORMATION: Finding aid prepared by Chela Scott Weber and Desiree Alden HISTORICAL NOTE/BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE At the end of the 19th Century, New York City had a system of steam-powered, elevated train lines, run by the Manhattan Railway (MRy) in Manhattan and the Bronx, and by the Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company (BRT) in Brooklyn. Between 1898 and 1903, these steam-powered lines were converted to electric power. In 1899, the MRy began building a large powerhouse on the East River at 74th Street to generate power for its elevated lines and 8 substations to convert and transmit that power to the train lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Contains Details to Implement the Requirements of Technical Specifications 6.7.6G and 6.7.6H
    PJVID Controlled Copy PROGRAM MANUAL Offsite Dose Calculation Manual SORC Review: 08-040 Date: 7/17/08 Effective Date: 7-18-08 FRINFOPMATION OMNY ODCM Manual Owner: Rev. 32 D. A. Robinson ABSTRACT The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) contains details to implement the requirements of Technical Specifications 6.7.6g and 6.7.6h. The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is divided into two parts: (1) the Radioactive Effluent Controls Program for both in-plant radiological effluent monitoring of liquids and gases, along with the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) (Part A); and (2) approved methods to determine effluent monitor setpoint values and estimates of doses and radionuclide concentrations occurring beyond the boundaries of Seabrook Station resulting from normal Station operation (Part B). The sampling and analysis requirements of the Radioactive Effluent Controls Program, specified in Part A, provide the inputs for the models of Part B in order to calculate offsite doses and radionuclide concentrations necessary to determine compliance with the dose and concentration requirements of the Station Technical Specification 6.7.6g. The REMP required by Technical Specification 6.7.6h, and as specified within this manual, provides the means to determine that measurable concentrations of radioactive materials released as a result of the operation of Seabrook Station are not significantly higher than expected. Revisions to the ODCM require an interdisciplinary review documented on the following page as well as a SORC review prior to implementing the change. An interdisciplinary review includes as a minimum the potential impact the change has on the respective departments' programs and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration & Finance Design and Construction Specifications for the Bressler Research Building Substations 4-7 Renewal
    ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BRESSLER RESEARCH BUILDING SUBSTATIONS 4-7 RENEWAL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY PROJECT # 19-312 BUILDING INVENTORY No. 8050 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROJECT SPECFICATIONS December 18, 2020 Office of Facilities Management Design and Construction ________________________________________________________________________ Owner Board of Public Works University of Maryland, Baltimore Lawrence J. Hogan Jr., Governor Design and Construction Peter Franchot, Comptroller Office of Facilities Management Nancy K. Kopp, Treasurer 620 W. Lexington Street, 6 th Floor Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Maryland General Assembly William C. Ferguson, Senate President Adrienne A. Jones, House Speak ________________________________________________________________________ Architect Marshall Craft Associates, Inc. 2031 Clipper Park Road Baltimore, MD 21211 MEP Engineer WFT Engineering 1801 Research Blvd., Suite 100 Rockville, MD 20850 Structural Engineer Carroll Engineering 215 Schilling Circle, Suite 102 Hunt Valley, MD 21031 University of Maryland Bressler Research Building – Substations 4-7 Renewal Project No: 19-312 Construction Documents December 18, 2020 UMB MASTER SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 01: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION TITLE 010100 SUMMARY OF WORK 010270 APPLICATIONS FOR PAYMENT 010350 MODIFICATION PROCEDURES 010400 COORDINATION 010450 CUTTING AND PATCHING 010950 REFERENCE STANDARDS & DEFINITIONS 012000 PROJECT MEETINGS 012300 ALTERNATES 013000 SUBMITTALS PROCEDURES
    [Show full text]