DOCSLIB.ORG

Lin 1Y Section 09 Winter 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lin 1Y Section 09 Winter 2016 Phonetics LIN 1Y SECTION 09 WINTER 2016 1 Phonetics Three areas of study ◦ Articulatory ◦ How speech sounds are produced in the vocal tract ◦ Looks at source of sound ◦ Acoustic ◦ The physical properties of speech sounds (sound waves, frequency spectra, duration, etc.) ◦ Looks at the signal ◦ Auditory ◦ how listeners perceive speech ◦ Looks at reception of sound 2 Describing consonants What is a consonant? ◦ Speech sound involving impedance of the airstream along the vocal tract ◦ English consonants are pulmonic (are moving out from the lungs) Three Part Categorization Voicing ◦ State of glottis (vocal folds vibrating or not) Place of articulation ◦ Where along the vocal tract the airstream is obstructed Manner ◦ How the are stream is impeded 3 Voicing Voiced ◦ vocal folds vibrating Voiceless (unvoiced) ◦ Vocal folds held apart and still [z] vs [s] Note: sometimes spelling that looks voicesless represents a voiced sound, e.g. the ‘s’ in rose 4 Place of articulation Where along the vocal tract the obstruction is located ◦ Lips ◦ Teeth ◦ Alveolar ridge ◦ Hard palate ◦ Soft palate ◦ Uvula ◦ Pharynx ◦ Glottis 5 Place of articulation Bilabial ◦ Lower lip in contact with upper lip Velar Labiodental ◦ tongue root to velum (soft palate) ◦ Lower lip to upper teeth Uvular Interdental ◦ Tongue root to uvula, or trilled uvula ◦ Tongue between teeth Pharyngeal Alveolar ◦ Constriction in pharynx ◦ Tongue to alveolar ridge Glottal Palatal ◦ Vocal folds open or closed ◦ Tongue to hard palate 6 English places of articulation Bilabial: [p], [b], [m] Labiodental: [f], [v] Interdental: [θ], [ð] Alveolar: [t], [d], [n], [s], [z], [ɹ], [l] Alveolopalatal: [ʃ], [ʒ], [ʧ], [ʤ] Palatal: [j] Velar: [k], [ɡ], [ŋ] Glottal: [h], [ʔ] 7 Quiz Places found in languages other than English Uvular (German, French ‘r’ sound) Pharyngeal (Arabic, Hebrew etc.) Dental (Spanish ‘t’ and ‘d’) 9 10 Manner of articulation HOW the air stream is impeded Affricate ◦ Short stop released into fricative Stop ◦ Fully occluded oral cavity Liquid ◦ Partial closure Fricative ◦ resonant ◦ Tight contriction, small space ◦ Turbulent, continuous air Glide ◦ Slightly occluded Trill (not in English) ◦ Vowel-like ◦ Fast air, fluttering articulator Tap/flap ◦ Rapid full closue 11 English manners of articulation stop: [p], [b], [t], [d], [k], [ɡ], [ʔ], [m], [n], [ŋ] tall, able, lack, sing Fricative: [f], [v], [θ], [ð], [s], [z], [ʃ], [ʒ], [h] vine, ricer, miss Tap/flap: [ɾ] butter Affricate: [ʧ], [ʤ] choose, future, judge Liquid: [l], [ɹ] loose, ruler Glide: [w], [j] win, yoyo 12 Non-English manners Trill: [r] (Spanish) [ʙ], [ʀ] Airstream mechanisms Ejectives: glottlic eggressive Implosives: glottalic ingressive ◦ Glug glug Clicks: lingual or velaric ingressive ◦ Tsk tsk 13 Click language 14 Using an IPA chart 15 Bonus Parameter: Nasal/oral Sounds can also be classified as nasal or oral Nasal sounds are produced with the velum lowered ◦ When the velum is lowered, air passes through the nasal passage ◦ Nasal sounds = [m], [n], [ŋ] Oral sounds are produced with the velum raised ◦ Air passes through the oral cavity ◦ Oral sounds = all sounds except nasals 16 Consonants Review What are consonants ◦ Speech sounds with a disturbed airstream How do we classify consonants ◦ Voicing ◦ Place ◦ Manner ◦ Nasal/oral 17 Practice: consonants Identify which of the following are velar consonants: ◦[n] [f] [g] [l] [k] [ŋ] [j] [ɹ] 18 Practice: consonants Identify which of the following are velar consonants: ◦[n] [f] [g] [l] [k] [ŋ] [j] [ɹ] 19 Practice: consonants Identify which of the following are voiced fricatives: ◦[ʃ] [ɹ] [n] [z] [v] [ʧ] [ð] [p] [θ] [ʒ] [f] 20 Practice: consonants Identify which of the following are voiced fricatives: ◦[ʃ] [ɹ] [n] [z] [v] [ʧ] [ð] [p] [θ] [ʒ] [f] 21 IPA practice Write the symbol that corresponds to the description: a. voiceless bilabial oral stop [p] b. voiced velar nasal stop [ŋ] c. voiced palatal glide [j] 22 IPA practice Write the phonetic description for the following symbols: a. [θ] voiceless interdental fricative b.[m] voiced bilabial nasal stop c. [d] voiced alveolar oral stop d.[k] voiceless velar oral stop 23.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic
    Linguistics and Literature Studies 2(7): 185-189, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2014.020702 A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic Iram Sabir*, Nora Alsaeed Al-Jouf University, Sakaka, KSA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract The present study deals with “A brief Modern Standard Arabic. This study starts from an description of consonants in Modern Standard Arabic”. This elucidation of the phonetic bases of sounds classification. At study tries to give some information about the production of this point shows the first limit of the study that is basically Arabic sounds, the classification and description of phonetic rather than phonological description of sounds. consonants in Standard Arabic, then the definition of the This attempt of classification is followed by lists of the word consonant. In the present study we also investigate the consonant sounds in Standard Arabic with a key word for place of articulation in Arabic consonants we describe each consonant. The criteria of description are place and sounds according to: bilabial, labio-dental, alveolar, palatal, manner of articulation and voicing. The attempt of velar, uvular, and glottal. Then the manner of articulation, description has been made to lead to the drawing of some the characteristics such as phonation, nasal, curved, and trill. fundamental conclusion at the end of the paper. The aim of this study is to investigate consonant in MSA taking into consideration that all 28 consonants of Arabic alphabets. As a language Arabic is one of the most 2.
    [Show full text]
  • LT3212 Phonetics Assignment 4 Mavis, Wong Chak Yin
    LT3212 Phonetics Assignment 4 Mavis, Wong Chak Yin Essay Title: The sound system of Japanese This essay aims to introduce the sound system of Japanese, including the inventories of consonants, vowels, and diphthongs. The phonological variations of the sound segments in different phonetic environments are also included. For the illustration, word examples are given and they are presented in the following format: [IPA] (Romaji: “meaning”). Consonants In Japanese, there are 14 core consonants, and some of them have a lot of allophonic variations. The various types of consonants classified with respect to their manner of articulation are presented as follows. Stop Japanese has six oral stops or plosives, /p b t d k g/, which are classified into three place categories, bilabial, alveolar, and velar, as listed below. In each place category, there is a pair of plosives with the contrast in voicing. /p/ = a voiceless bilabial plosive [p]: [ippai] (ippai: “A cup of”) /b/ = a voiced bilabial plosive [b]: [baɴ] (ban: “Night”) /t/ = a voiceless alveolar plosive [t]: [oto̞ ːto̞ ] (ototo: “Brother”) /d/ = a voiced alveolar plosive [d]: [to̞ mo̞ datɕi] (tomodachi: “Friend”) /k/ = a voiceless velar plosive [k]: [kaiɰa] (kaiwa: “Conversation”) /g/ = a voiced velar plosive [g]: [ɡakɯβsai] (gakusai: “Student”) Phonetically, Japanese also has a glottal stop [ʔ] which is commonly produced to separate the neighboring vowels occurring in different syllables. This phonological phenomenon is known as ‘glottal stop insertion’. The glottal stop may be realized as a pause, which is used to indicate the beginning or the end of an utterance. For instance, the word “Japanese money” is actually pronounced as [ʔe̞ ɴ], instead of [je̞ ɴ], and the pronunciation of “¥15” is [dʑɯβːɡo̞ ʔe̞ ɴ].
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00h9g9gg Author Shosted, Ryan K Publication Date 2006 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives by Ryan Keith Shosted B.A. (Brigham Young University) 2000 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: John J. Ohala, Chair Keith Johnson Milton M. Azevedo Fall 2006 The dissertation of Ryan Keith Shosted is approved: Chair Date Date Date University of California, Berkeley Fall 2006 The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives Copyright 2006 by Ryan Keith Shosted 1 Abstract The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives by Ryan Keith Shosted Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley John J. Ohala, Chair Understanding the relationship of aerodynamic laws to the unique geometry of the hu- man vocal tract allows us to make phonological and typological predictions about speech sounds typified by particular aerodynamic regimes. For example, some have argued that the realization of nasalized fricatives is improbable because fricatives and nasals have an- tagonistic aerodynamic specifications. Fricatives require high pressure behind the suprala- ryngeal constriction as a precondition for high particle velocity. Nasalization, on the other hand, vents back pressure by allowing air to escape through the velopharyngeal orifice. This implies that an open velopharyngeal port will reduce oral particle velocity, thereby potentially extinguishing frication. By using a mechanical model of the vocal tract and spoken fricatives that have undergone coarticulatory nasalization, it is shown that nasal- ization must alter the spectral characteristics of fricatives, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to The
    PREVIEW OF THE IPA HANDBOOK Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet PARTI Introduction to the IPA 1. What is the International Phonetic Alphabet? The aim of the International Phonetic Association is to promote the scientific study of phonetics and the various practical applications of that science. For both these it is necessary to have a consistent way of representing the sounds of language in written form. From its foundation in 1886 the Association has been concerned to develop a system of notation which would be convenient to use, but comprehensive enough to cope with the wide variety of sounds found in the languages of the world; and to encourage the use of thjs notation as widely as possible among those concerned with language. The system is generally known as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Both the Association and its Alphabet are widely referred to by the abbreviation IPA, but here 'IPA' will be used only for the Alphabet. The IPA is based on the Roman alphabet, which has the advantage of being widely familiar, but also includes letters and additional symbols from a variety of other sources. These additions are necessary because the variety of sounds in languages is much greater than the number of letters in the Roman alphabet. The use of sequences of phonetic symbols to represent speech is known as transcription. The IPA can be used for many different purposes. For instance, it can be used as a way to show pronunciation in a dictionary, to record a language in linguistic fieldwork, to form the basis of a writing system for a language, or to annotate acoustic and other displays in the analysis of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Singing in English in the 21St Century: a Study Comparing
    SINGING IN ENGLISH IN THE 21ST CENTURY: A STUDY COMPARING AND APPLYING THE TENETS OF MADELEINE MARSHALL AND KATHRYN LABOUFF Helen Dewey Reikofski Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2015 APPROVED:….……………….. Jeffrey Snider, Major Professor Stephen Dubberly, Committee Member Benjamin Brand, Committee Member Stephen Austin, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of Vocal Studies … James C. Scott, Dean of the College of Music Costas Tsatsoulis, Interim Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Reikofski, Helen Dewey. Singing in English in the 21st Century: A Study Comparing and Applying the Tenets of Madeleine Marshall and Kathryn LaBouff. Doctor of Musical Arts (Performance), August 2015, 171 pp., 6 tables, 21 figures, bibliography, 141 titles. The English diction texts by Madeleine Marshall and Kathryn LaBouff are two of the most acclaimed manuals on singing in this language. Differences in style between the two have separated proponents to be primarily devoted to one or the other. An in- depth study, comparing the precepts of both authors, and applying their principles, has resulted in an understanding of their common ground, as well as the need for the more comprehensive information, included by LaBouff, on singing in the dialect of American Standard, and changes in current Received Pronunciation, for British works, and Mid- Atlantic dialect, for English language works not specifically North American or British. Chapter 1 introduces Marshall and The Singer’s Manual of English Diction, and LaBouff and Singing and Communicating in English. An overview of selected works from Opera America’s resources exemplifies the need for three dialects in standardized English training.
    [Show full text]
  • An Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Perceptual Investigation of Word-Initial Denasalization in Korean
    An acoustic, aerodynamic and perceptual investigation of word-initial denasalization in Korean Young Shin Kim A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of University College London. Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences UCL 2011 2 I, Young Shin Kim, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Young Shin Kim 김영신 (金英信) 3 Abstract Korean nasals /m/ and /n/ are generally considered by Korean phoneticians to be hardly different from the corresponding English sounds, but those in word-initial position are often perceived as plosives by native speakers of English. This had been noted by only a few previous observers, and investigated on a very limited scale. In this study, various experimental methods were employed in systematic analyses of the production and acoustic form of word-initial /m/ and /n/ from fluent connected speech collected from a relatively large number of informants, and corresponding perception tests were conducted with groups of Korean and English listeners. Auditory and spectrographic analyses confirmed that the segments were commonly “denasalized”. They display characteristics widely different from those of sonorant nasals, lacking the nasal formants commonly seen in spectrograms; in most cases they were more similar to voiced plosives, many tokens even showing plosive- like release bursts. Spectral analyses confirmed that denasalized nasals are significantly different from sonorant nasals throughout the whole frequency range but remain somewhat different from voiced plosives in the low and high frequency regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossopoeia a Contrastive Phonological Study Of
    DEPARTAMENT DE FILOLOGIA ANGLESA I DE GERMANÍSTICA Glossopoeia A Contrastive Phonological Study of Sindarin and Klingon Treball de Fi de Grau Author: Mónica Malvárez Ocaña Supervisor: Hortènsia Curell Gotor Grau d’Estudis Anglesos June 2020 jyE qhE5 `B 7r$`B6E tiT16E lE5 Law pain i reviar mistar aen. Not all those who wander are lost. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Hortènsia Curell, not only for her help and support during these difficult months that I have been abroad, but also for giving me the opportunity and the freedom to explore other fascinating linguistic areas, such as glossopoeia. I would also like to thank my friends and family for always pushing me to go one step further and to think outside the box. I discovered the universe of Middle-Earth during my childhood, and for that reason, it will always have a special place in my heart. Before going to bed, my father used to read The Hobbit to me. I remember being mesmerized by the story and the characters, and even now, as an adult, I am still mesmerized by what J.R.R. Tolkien created. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2 2. Constructed Languages ............................................................................................... 3 2.1. Classification of Conlangs ................................................................................ 3 2.1.1. Historical Classification ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phones and Phonemes
    NLPA-Phon1 (4/10/07) © P. Coxhead, 2006 Page 1 Natural Language Processing & Applications Phones and Phonemes 1 Phonemes If we are to understand how speech might be generated or recognized by a computer, we need to study some of the underlying linguistic theory. The aim here is to UNDERSTAND the theory rather than memorize it. I’ve tried to reduce and simplify as much as possible without serious inaccuracy. Speech consists of sequences of sounds. The use of an instrument (such as a speech spectro- graph) shows that most of normal speech consists of continuous sounds, both within words and across word boundaries. Speakers of a language can easily dissect its continuous sounds into words. With more difficulty, they can split words into component sounds, or ‘segments’. However, it is not always clear where to stop splitting. In the word strip, for example, should the sound represented by the letters str be treated as a unit, be split into the two sounds represented by st and r, or be split into the three sounds represented by s, t and r? One approach to isolating component sounds is to look for ‘distinctive unit sounds’ or phonemes.1 For example, three phonemes can be distinguished in the word cat, corresponding to the letters c, a and t (but of course English spelling is notoriously non- phonemic so correspondence of phonemes and letters should not be expected). How do we know that these three are ‘distinctive unit sounds’ or phonemes of the English language? NOT from the sounds themselves. A speech spectrograph will not show a neat division of the sound of the word cat into three parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalences Between Different Phonetic Alphabets
    Equivalences between different phonetic alphabets by Carlos Daniel Hern´andezMena Description IPA Mexbet X-SAMPA IPA Symbol in LATEX Voiceless bilabial plosive p p p p Voiceless dental plosive” t t t d ntextsubbridgeftg Voiceless velar plosive k k k k Voiceless palatalized plosive kj k j k j kntextsuperscriptfjg Voiced bilabial plosive b b b b Voiced bilabial approximant B VB o ntextloweringfntextbetag fl Voiced dental plosive d” d d d ntextsubbridgefdg Voiced dental fricative flD DD o ntextloweringfntextipafn;Dgg Voiced velar plosive g g g g Voiced velar fricative Èfl GG o ntextloweringfntextbabygammag Voiceless palato-alveolar affricate t“S tS tS ntextroundcapftntexteshg Voiceless labiodental fricative f f f f Voiceless alveolar fricative s s s s Voiced alveolar fricative z z z z Voiceless dental fricative” s s [ s d ntextsubbridgefsg Voiced dental fricative” z z [ z d ntextsubbridgefzg Voiceless postalveolar fricative S SS ntextesh Voiceless velar fricative x x x x Voiced palatal fricative J Z jn ntextctj Voiced postalveolar affricate d“Z dZ dZ ntextroundcapfdntextyoghg Voiced bilabial nasal m m m m Voiced alveolar nasal n n n n Voiced labiodental nasal M MF ntextltailm Voiced dental nasal n” n [ n d ntextsubbridgefng Voiced palatalized nasal nj n j n j nntextsuperscriptfjg Voiced velarized nasal nÈ N n G nntextsuperscript fntextbabygammag Voiced palatal nasal ñ n∼ J ntextltailn Voiced alveolar lateral approximant l l l l Voiced dental lateral” l l [ l d ntextsubbridgeflg Voiced palatalized lateral lj l j l j lntextsuperscriptfjg Lowered
    [Show full text]
  • Universals, Their Violation and the Notion of Phonologically Peculiar Languages 2
    1 Vladimir Pericliev Journal of Universal Language 5 March 2004, 1-28 Universals, Their Violation and the Notion of Phonologically Pe- culiar Languages Vladimir Pericliev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Abstract A language can be said to be “peculiar” if it violates a universal pattern that admits only very few excep- tions. In the paper, we propose a typology of phonological peculiarities concerning the content of segment inventories, and deal in detail with one of these types. The type involves the illegitimate absence of a segment that an implicational universal predicts should actually be present in the segment inventory of a language. A computer program retrieved 33 phonological peculiarities of this type in the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database (UPSID), comprising 451 languages. It turned out that 391 of these languages had no peculiarity of the type studied, 43 had one, and 17 more than one peculiarity. Some observations are made regarding the last category of 17 “strongly peculiar” languages. In particular, it is shown that despite their strong phonological idiosyncrasy, the peculiar languages have only a limited variability in that they cannot violate more than six universals or have more than three distinct segments lacking. Keywords: phonological universals, types of phonological peculiarities, gaps in segment inventories 1. Introduction A language can be said to be “peculiar” (or “deviant”) if there is a universally valid norm for the class of all languages and this language belongs to a very small subclass of languages that violate the norm. The violated norm (or universal) can be any sort of linguistic object (entity, relation, rule, etc.), and depending on the domain to which the norm belongs, linguistic peculiarities can be phonological, morphological, syntactic or semantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoshone Phonemes
    Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session Volume 11 Article 4 1967 Shoshone phonemes Wesley L. Kosin SIL-UND Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers Part of the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Kosin, Wesley L. (1967) "Shoshone phonemes," Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session: Vol. 11 , Article 4. DOI: 10.31356/silwp.vol11.04 Available at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol11/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rough draft. For private circulation only. Shoshone Phonemes Wesley L. Kosin Summer Institute of Linguistics University of North Dakota l. PHONETIC CHARTS Page 2 2. INTERl'RET AT I ON 3 2.1. INTERPRETATION OF SEMI-VOWELS 3 2.2. SEGI'i1ENTATION 4 2. 3. RESULTANT PHONEME CHART 4 3. CONSONANT PHONEMES 5 4 • VmlEL FHONEME S 9 5. DISTRIBUTION OF PHONEMES 10 6. PREDICTABLE PHONEME VARIATIONS 11 7. SUGGESrED ORTHOGRAPHY 12 Shoshone is a language of the Numic Group of the Shoshonean Family. It is spoken by approximately 5,000 speakers in the Idaho-Nevada-Wyoming area. This description is based on the language as spoken on the Wind River Reserva­ tion in Wyoming. The investigation on which this is based was carried out during the years of 1959 to 1967 except for the summers which were spent at the Summer Institute of Linguistics in Grand Forks, North Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Symbols Because the International Phonetic Association
    List of Symbols Because the International Phonetic Association (IPA) and its symbols and conventions are the most linguistically acceptable tool of phonetic transcription, they have been adopted in this book to transcribe both English and Spanish as well as other languages when necessary. Slight modifications in both letter symbols and diacritics are occasionally used. Below is a list of the symbols and conventions used: Vowels Phonetic Description i Close front with spread lips Close front (somewhat centralized) to close-mid with spread lips گ e Close-mid front with unrounded lips ϯ Open-mid front with unrounded lips ҷ Open-mid central with unrounded lips a Open front with unrounded lips э Near-open central vowel æ Near-open front with unrounded lips Ϫ Open back with unrounded lips Ҳ Open back with rounded lips o Close-mid back with rounded lips ѐ Open-mid back with rounded lips u Close back with rounded lips Ѩ Near-close near-back with rounded lips ѩ Open-mid back with unrounded lips ђ Mid central (neutral) vowel (schwa) ɚ R-colored (rhotacized) mid central (schwar) ɝ R-colored (rhotacized) open-mid central Diphthongs au as in <how, now> ai as in <high, tie> oi as in <boy, noise> ou; o as in <go, know> ei; e as in <bait, gate> i; iɚ as in <here, dear> e; eɚ as in <there, bear> u; uɚ as in <poor, tour> x Consonants Phonetic Description b Voiced bilabial plosive p Voiceless unaspirated bilabial plosive p Voiceless aspirated bilabial plosive d Voiced alveolar plosive t Voiceless unaspirated alveolar plosive t Voiceless aspirated alveolar
    [Show full text]