Charles Darwin, Alfred Wallace, and Natural Selection Charles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charles Darwin, Alfred Wallace, and Natural Selection Charles 8/29/2011 Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) Charles Darwin, Alfred Wallace, and Natural Selection 1881 1840 Charles Darwin by the early 1800s: •credited with “discovering” evolution • Generally accepted that both plants and • On the Origin of Species animals are sexual organisms • did two things • males use sperm/pollen to pass traits; females •established that species have changed over time use eggs (evolved) • need for pollen in sexual reproduction by •proposed a mechanism for how that process took plants is well known place (natural selection) 1. Stable varieties nearly always breed true. 2. You can mate two different parents to Also by the early 1800s, farmers and generate hybrids, which can be identical to stockbreeders had some “rules of one parent or combine features of both parents. (hybrid x hybrid crosses result in thumb” on practical genetics. extreme variation in the offspring → hybrids don’t breed true) 3. Sometimes you get “sports” (mutants), even in stable varieties. (The sports could be backcrossed with “normals” to create new stable varieties.) 1 8/29/2011 • Erasmus Darwin: wrote a book ( Zoonomia ) and poems that included passages about But, a prevalent idea in the 19th century was organisms changing over time fixity of species • Buffon (Laclerc): in his 44 volume magnum – each species is a separate creation by a creator opus, provided evidence for change over time – species have not changed over time • Lamarck: hereditary change over time occurred due to characteristics acquired That species are not fixed: “a common enough during the lifetime of an organism heresy at the time” • striving to acquire a trait vs. the random occurrence of mutations Disproving Lamarck Natural Selection • Remember: science as a process to acquire mid-1800s: information to understand the natural world Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin • based on observations, formulate hypotheses, make independently proposed that inherited change predictions, do experiments over time occurs by natural selection • If Lamarck is correct, then we should be able to alter an existing trait and then see that new version passed to offspring • Removed mouse tails for several generations. Tails never disappeared from subsequent generations; tails didn't even get shorter over time. Alfred Russel Wallace Charles Robert Darwin • 1855: "On the Law Which Has Regulated the Introduction of New Species" • 1859: On the Origin of Species – – In this pre-natural selection essay Wallace all provided copious evidence that species are not fixed but directly states the role of natural – proposed theory of natural selection selection in an evolutionary interpretation of as the mechanism for evolutionary geographical and geological patterns of change species distribution. • 1868: Variations in Animals and • 1858: "On the Tendency of Varieties to Plants under Domestication – used domestication of species to Depart Indefinitely from the Original show how selection of certain traits Type" over time can change a species – The 'Ternate essay' Wallace sent to Darwin containing the former's original elucidation of the theory of natural selection. 1868 Portrait by Julia Cameron http://kentsimmons.uwinnipeg.ca/16cm05/1116/16evolut.htm http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/index1.htm http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/awlee/art242/cameron/image3.html 2 8/29/2011 • They were two of the many Europeans who went to New World tropics in the 19 th century as naturalists • Darwin was on an official survey mission with the British Navy; originally as the captain's social companion; became the de facto naturalist • Wallace went with a friend (Henry Walter Bates); backed by a vendor in Britain who would sell their collections • Both Darwin and Wallace collected multiple • Both shared the two sources of information individuals of the same species – saw the for their eureka moment variation of a single species • 1. observing biogeography of similar species • saw similarities between species in adjacent on nearby islands locales • Darwin, the Galapagos Islands • observed geographic distributions of species • Wallace, the Malay archipelago (biogeography) Natural Selection • 2. Read Malthus • resources limit the numbers in a population • more offspring are produced than can survive • the human population will outstrip its food supply • individuals within a population vary; at least unless the population is held in check by war, some of the variation can be inherited disease, etc. • differential reproduction and survival • Darwin and Wallace realized that natural • populations are held in check by some limiting therefore, over time, the most advantageous factor in their environments; only those traits for reproduction and survival individuals that survived the “check” will (adaptations) will increase in a population reproduce 3 8/29/2011 Adaptation Darwin in the Galapagos • structure, physiology, behavior • was collecting tortoises • aids in fitting an organism to its environment • someone told him that he must • examples have been on island X in order to get those tortoises – the butterfly egg mimics on the passionflower • Darwin realizes that the different tendrils islands have distinct species and – creosote bush produces that he should label his collections as coming from a allelopathic chemicals specific island, rather than the which reduce competition Galapagos as a whole. for water and minerals • has to re-label his bird collections http://www.tarleton.edu/Departments/range/Shrublands/Sonoran%20Desert/sonorandesert.html Darwin's Finches http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Ec&Ev_Distance_learning/Finches/darwin_review.htm C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species Darwin's Orchid Natural Selection • result of variation, differential reproduction, and heredity • it is not planned; there are no goals; there is no "progress" up an evolutionary ladder • it does not produce perfection; an organism is “good enough” to survive long enough and produce offspring Angraecum sesquipedale Xanthopan morganii praedicta http://www.larsen-twins.dk/orch-new/Orc_a/Angraecum_sesquipedale_391-22x.html http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sharemed/targets/images/pho/t045/T045107A.jpg 4.
Recommended publications
  • Orquídeas Christian Demetrio Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998 Classificação
    Orquídeas Christian Demetrio Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998 Classificação: • Domínio: Eukariota • Reino: Plantae • Divisão: Magnoliophyta (Angiospermas) • Classe: Liliopsida (Monocotiledoneas) • Ordem: Asparagales • Família: Orchidaceae Família: Orchidaceae • Subfamílias: Apostasioidea Vanilloidea Cypripedioidea Orchidoidea Epidendroidea Distribuição: Gênero tipo – Lineu 1753 Orchis Espécie tipo: Orchis militaris Família Orchidaceae • 850 gêneros • 25.000 espécies • Mais de 100.000 híbridos registrados (RHS) Orchidaceae - Brasil Gêneros: 221 Espécies: 2491 Subespécies: 10 Variedades: 17 Orchidaceae in Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB179>. Acesso em: 04 Abr. 2017 Caracterização da Família • Características gerais das monocotiledôneas • Estrutura floral: simetria bilateral Pétalas e sépalas semelhantes Labelo Coluna Polínia Ressupinação • Raízes com velame (epífitas) • Sementes diminutas X micorriza (Mycorrhyzum) Folhas: paralelinérvicas Sobralia spp Raízes fasciculadas Velame Estrutura Floral Sépala dorsal ou superior Pétalas Lóbulos laterais Sépalas laterais ou inferiores Lóbulo medial Estrutura Floral 1 – Sépala Dorsal; 2 – Pétalas; 3 – Sépalas Laterais; 4 – Lóbulo Frontal; 5 – Labelo; 6 – Ovário; 7 – Coluna; 8 – Estigma; 9 – Antena Coluna Políneas Antera Estigma Ressupinação Angraecum scottianum não ressupina Laelia purpurata ressupina Classificação pelo tipo de crescimento Simpodial Classificação pelo
    [Show full text]
  • January 2011
    An Affiliate of the American Orchid Society FORT LAUDERDALE ORCHID SOCIETY January 20lL Fred Clarke To Speak Jan. 10th Our Best Time, Show Time This artwork is to set the tone for beautiful and Our January meeting always kicks off show week and special which describes our show and one of the for that reason alone it is both busy and exciting. TIlis world's most famous orchids to be described here later. year we have a very exciting night planned. Fred Now some show thoughts. Our show is probably Clarke is famous for his ("a/ose/1I1Il intergencric the second largest display show in the United States. hybrids which produced, afier 10 years of work, the It costs about S50,000 to put on. One of the many blackest flowers every witnessed. That plant was of happy things about the show is the tim of working course Fredclarkeara After Dark wh ich has been together, and we do work. It takes 163 fo ur hour shill:; awarded eight FCCs. Fred has recently added New to make the show what it is while it is open. [t takes Guiana DendrobiulIIs to his ' normal' interest range of mega other hours for pre-show activities. This Co/ase/ums. Cyc floches, Mormodes and hybridizing newsletter is going out early to remind you to COllleyas. Bulbop/iylulIIs and PaphiopedilulIls. volunteer for one or more show sbifts. The greatest Fred's business is Sunset Orchids in Vista, needs are for the I :20-4:40, and the 4:40-8:00 PM Ca lifornia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orchid Society of Karnataka (TOSKAR) Newsletter – June 2016 1
    The Orchid Society of Karnataka (TOSKAR) Newsletter – June 2016 1 The Orchid Society of Karnataka (TOSKAR) Newsletter – June 2016 2 The Orchid Society of Karnataka (TOSKAR) Newsletter – June 2016 3 NAGESHWAR’S JOURNEY FROM ONION TO ORCHIDS Dr N. Shakuntala Manay Here is Nagesh’s story, the first recipient of TOSKAR Rolling Shield for the Best Orchid. His interest in growing plants started as a child of eight when he would pick up sprouting onions from Mom’s kitchen onion and plant them in the yard and watched them grow into green leeks. This got him into the hobby to grow vegetables. By this time he was 14. Later he turned to growing foliage plants like succulents, Anthuriums and Cacti. Thus he dared to enter into annual shows at Lalbagh and won many prizes. In “small homes garden” categories he won eight awards from Urban Art Commission such as “Best Maintained Building & Garden” “Pride of Bangalore” “Role of Honour” etc. Ex- commissioners of Bangalore City Corporation Late N. Laxman Rao and Late Mr. Parthsarathy would visit his house as Judges. He received these prestigious prizes amidst distinguished guests and dignitaries at Rajbhavan. Trophies gathered so fast that there was no place for them at home. Twenty years ago he got one orchid from Indo American Nursery. Thus he began collecting orchids from Kerala, North East India and Western Ghats. Now on his terrace of 800 sq ft he has 1500 orchids! Among these Dracula Orchid (Monkey face) which grows in cloud mountains of Mexico, Central America and Colombia is one of his special collections, and more than 15 varieties of Carnivorous Plants and many Tillandsias also add to his collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid View OUR NEXT MONTHLY MEETING October 2, 2017 MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS Great Room by the Bay, the Activities Center, 811 S
    October Orchid View OUR NEXT MONTHLY MEETING October 2, 2017 MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS Great Room by the Bay, The Activities Center, 811 S. Palm Avenue, Sarasota, FL 6:00 Door Opens 6:15 Culture class with Roy Krueger 7:00 Business Meeting Speaker Dr. Kristen Uthus from New World Orchids Subject: Japanese Orchids Members Only’ Silent Auction Members’ Plant Table Plant Raffle completes our Meeting! Guests are always welcome! Club address; PO Box 19895, Sarasota, FL 34276-2895 Please Note: Should you arrive to our Monthly SOS Meeting after 7:00 pm, when the Gate to the Selby Activities Center is locked, please call the cell phone of one of our members in the meeting, as listed on the gate. Someone will come down to let you in. Selby’s Rules are such that the Gate must be locked once our meeting has started, at which time no one is available to continue to sit by the gate. 1 Show Notes; The Volunteer Signup Book for the 2018 Show will be on hand at the October meeting. For those who can’t sign up in person, we will send an email with information about how to sign up for your preferred committee. We need everyone’s participation to make this the best show ever! -------------------------------------------------- Our Speaker----- Dr. Kristen Uthus New World Orchids is owned and operated by Dr. Kristen Uthus with help from her husband, Dr. Kevin Wehrly, and her two sons, Henry and Gus. Although they specialize in Japanese species, in the last year, they have expanded their collection back into the New World by offering a number of miniature species from other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • PHES12 343-403.Pdf
    343 Insects Associated with Orchids By O. H. SWEZEY Consulting Entomologist Experiment Station, H.S.P.A., Honolulu CONTENTS PAGE PAGE Introduction --- ••— 344 Heteroptera " - ----- 367 Coleoptera apparently attached Miridae (Plant bugs attached- . to orchids) 367 to orchids Curculionidae :: 345 Miscellaneous bugs intercepted Orchid weevils in Hawaii.... 345 on orchids 368 Orchid weevils known else Cydnidae 368 where than in Hawaii 349 Pentatomidae 3t>9 Scolytidae 352 Coreidae 369 Mordellistenidae 3W Lygaeidae - --- 370 Cerambycidae 354 Pyrrhocondae o/i Hispidae 354 Tingitidae 371 Chrysomelidae 355 - Aradidae : 3J2 List of Intercepted beetles 355 Miridae - -372 Chrysomelidae 355 Homoptera *. *'* Tenebrionidae 356 Aphididae - 372 Aleurodidae' .: * 3/6 Cucujidae - - - 357 Psyllidae 374 Trixagidae - M ' Lampyridae &» Membracidae - ^ Elateridae - - ^/ Coccidae r -;—- 3/4 List of scale insects for which Dermestidae 358 Lyctidae 358 orchids are the sole or Colidiidae 358 chief food plant 374 Anthribidae 358 List of scale insects having diverse food plants, in Hydrophilidae —• 358 cluding orchids -- 382 Scaphydiidae 358 Ptinidae 358 Orthoptera - -- 390 Melandryidae ^° Tettigoniidae ^ Coccinellidae - 358 Locustidae 392 Scarabaeidae ......— - 359 Gryllidae '- : 392 Endomychidae -• 359 Phasmidae I - 392 Scolytidae 359 Dermaptera - 392 Hymenoptera • 359 Roaches - —- 393 Eurytomidae - 6^/ Thysanoptera 393 Xylocopidae 360 Thrips described from orchids.. 393 Formicidae - ^ Thrips incidentally on orchids Lepidoptera - 362 or intercepted on imported Lycaenidae &£ orchids - 395 Castniidae • 362 Embioptera - - 396 Geometridae 364 Limacodidae ^4 Isoptera 397 Lithosiadae 364 Collembola - - 397 Liparidae 365 Insects which pollinate orchids.. 397 Plusiadae ; 365 Butterflies 398 Psychidae - 3o5 Moths 398 Pyralidae - 365 Bees 399 Tortricidae ^ Stinging ants y\ Cosmopterygidae 366 Wasps - ■■■■■ 401 Acrolophidae Flies ■ ■ 401 366 Diptera Diptera (undetermined) 402 Cecidomyiidae 366 Beetles - - 402 Tephritidae - 367 Thrips 402 Anthomyiidae 60/ Proc.
    [Show full text]
  • SAOS Newsletter
    NEWSLETTER February 2019 Volume 14 Issue #2 CLUB NEWS Feb. 5, 2019 Monthly winter growing SAOS Meeting area, review By Janis Croft how to prepare your orchids Welcome and Thanks. for display and President Tom Sullivan orchid shows opened the meeting at 7:00 and watch a pm with a 67 attendees. He demonstration asked Rae to announce our on navigating the four new members, Charlie SAOS website to Rowell, Anne O’Connor, find answers to all Shanti Bjorkman, Larry of your questions McNally, and returning Jerry and issues. She also announced that her husband Doug Fowler. Each received a free will be organizing a road trip to the Jacksonville Orchid Gene Crocker raffle ticket for joining this Society Show. month. Tom thanked Dottie Birthdays this Month - Our two February birthday people and Jeanette for bringing in desserts and Jeanette for raised their hands for their free raffle tickets. Sunshine organizing the refreshments. He then reminded all to drop Coordinator and Membership VP Linda announced that if a dollar in the basket while enjoying their refreshments. you know of anyone in need of a cheering up or get well card, Tom next informed all that the Best of Show voting would let Linda know by emailing her at info@staugorchidsociety. occur after the Show Table discussion and the silent auction org. would end before the presentation. He encouraged all to Library – Librarian Bea Orendorff brought in five books on vote for their favorite orchid on the Show Table. Cattleyas for people to borrow. If you would like a book, send a request to [email protected] and Bea will Club Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchids and Their Pollinators
    ORCHIDS AND THEIR POLLINATORS While some orchids are self-pollinating, most attract and rely on a specific pollinator to reproduce. Orchids evolved alongside their pollinators, including bees, wasps, flies, moths, butterflies, crickets, and the occasional bird. Many of the plant’s unique shapes and smells accommodate just one pollinator or a closely related group of pollinators. Masters of Deception Orchids are world class liars, using energy-rich nectar, protein-rich pollen, color, shape, and fragrance to attract pollinators. In doing so, pollinators unknowingly collect pollen on their bodies, which fertilizes the next orchid they visit. Mimicking the smell and shape of a female insect or the flower of another plant, or temporarily entrapping their victims, are just a few of the tricks orchids use. The labellum of the mirror orchid (Ophrys speculum) resembles the female wasp (Dasyscolia ciliata) to lure the male wasp to the flower for pollination. Darwin’s Orchid In 1862, Charles Darwin, the naturalist most known for his theory of evolution, was sent a sample of the Madagascar star orchid (Angraecum sesquipedale). After seeing the orchids long, narrow nectar tube, he predicted that there must be an insect with a very long proboscis (i.e. tongue-like part) that could reach all the way to the bottom of the tube to drink the nectar. However, no such insect had been discovered. Many believed that Darwin’s claim was ridiculous and some ridiculed his theory. However, in 1903, more than 20 years after Darwin’s death, the Morgan Sphinx moth (Xanthopan morganii praedicta) was discovered, fulfilling Darwin’s prediction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Margaret C. Ferguson Greenhouses Winter 2010
    WINTER 2010 THE BOOKS THAT BIND CENTERS FOR WOMEN 35TH ANNIVERSARY SMALL CHANGE, BIG CHANGES WHERE SCIENCE TAKES ROOT THE MARGARET C. FERGUSON GREENHOUSES WINTER 2010 ‘I think of [the Margaret C. 22 Where Science Takes Root by Jennifer McFarland Flint. Ferguson Greenhouses] as a With a lush and expansive collection ranging from the 130-year-old Durant low-hurdle introduction to Camellia to the pungent Brazilian Dutchman’s Pipe, the Margaret C. Ferguson science. You come in here Greenhouses aim to draw students into science and promote scientific and and get curious about these environmental literacy. cool plants, and that curiosity by Francie Latour. With its core is what will propel you to 32 Small Change, Big Changes principles of service, global engagement, and women’s empowerment, the next step, to start asking the microfinance industry has drawn scores of Wellesley alumnae questions.’ to its ranks. Here’s how dozens of alumnae are hoping to change —Kristina Jones, director of the Wellesley College Botanic Gardens the world, one small loan at a time. by Jenny Nash ’86. Cover photograph of bird of paradise and 38 The Books that Bind Alumnae reading tree frog and photograph above of the together in Wellesley book clubs find all kinds of connections—to the texts Mabel A. Stone Cryptogam House shot in the Margaret C. Ferguson Greenhouses and authors, to one another, and to their past selves as students and scholars. by Richard Howard 2 From the Editor 22 3 Letters to the Editor 4 From the President by H. Kim Bottomly 5 Window on Wellesley by Alice Hummer, Lisa Scanlon ’99, Francie Latour, and Jennifer McFarland Flint RICHARD HOWARD 18 Shelf Life Jean Mulvey Friedmann ’49, editor 32 38 20 First Person—Reading Nabokov in Wellesley by Alex Pistey ’10 44 Your Alumnae Association 46 Class Notes 76 In Memoriam—Nancy Longley Agnew ’50, Alice Turner Schafer, Linda K.
    [Show full text]
  • Orquídeas Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998
    14/05/2019 Orquídeas Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998 Christian Aparecido Demetrio Tetracampeão Nacional – CAOB 2010 – 2011 – 2012 – 2013 Mercado Consumidor Vanilla planifolia • Colecionadores: mudas, plantas adultas • Flores de corte • Flores em vasos • Mudas para produtores comerciais • Laboratório: próprio ou terceirizado, sementeiras e meristemas (outros produtos além de orquídeas) • Alimentício, medicina... 1 14/05/2019 Vanilla planifolia Classificação: • Domínio: Eukariota • Reino: Plantae • Divisão: Magnoliophyta (Angiospermas) • Classe: Liliopsida (Monocotiledoneas) • Ordem: Asparagales • Família: Orchidaceae Família: Orchidaceae Distribuição: • Subfamílias: Apostasioidea Vanilloidea Cypripedioidea Orchidoidea Epidendroidea 2 14/05/2019 Gênero tipo – Lineu 1753 Orchis Espécie tipo: Orchis militaris Orchidaceae - Brasil Família Orchidaceae • 850 gêneros • 25.000 espécies • Mais de 100.000 híbridos registrados Gêneros: 219 Espécies: 2451 (RHS) Subespécies: 10 Variedades: 16 Orchidaceae in Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB179>. Acesso em: 18 Mar. 2019 3 14/05/2019 Caracterização da Família • Características gerais das monocotiledôneas • Estrutura floral: simetria bilateral ✔Pétalas e sépalas semelhantes ✔Labelo ✔Coluna ✔Polínia ✔Ressupinação • Raízes com velame (epífitas) Velame • Sementes diminutas X micorriza (Mycorrhyzum) Coluna Estrutura Floral Sépala dorsal ou superior Políneas Anter a Pétalas Estigma
    [Show full text]
  • Wallace's Moth and Darwin's Orchid by George W
    1 Wallace's Moth and Darwin's Orchid By George W. Beccaloni, 2017 [This article may be cited as follows: Beccaloni, G. W. 2017. Wallace's moth and Darwin's orchid. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35778.38087] In January 1862 Charles Darwin was given a specimen of the Madagascan orchid Angraecum sesquipedale and was amazed by its spectacular flowers, which have a 30cm+ long hollow spur containing nectar near the bottom. He remarked in a letter to his friend Joseph Hooker "I have just received...a Box...from Mr Bateman with the astounding Angræcum sesquipedalia with a nectary a foot long— Good Heavens what insect can suck it". Later that year he published his book On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing (Darwin, 1862) and predicted that a moth would be found in Madagascar with a proboscis long enough to reach the nectar at the end of the spur, a suggestion that some of his colleagues scoffed at. A few years later in 1867 Alfred Russel Wallace published an article in which he supported Darwin's hypothesis, remarking that the African hawkmoth Xanthopan morganii (then known as Macrosila morganii) had a proboscis almost long enough to reach the bottom of the spur. In a footnote to this article Wallace wrote "That such a moth exists in Madagascar may be safely predicted; and naturalists who visit that island should search for it with as much confidence as astronomers searched for the planet Neptune, -and they will be equally successful!" (Wallace, 1867).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Cuttings Available Online at News in Botany: Nigel Chaffey Presents a Round-Up of Plant-Based Items from the World’S Media
    Annals of Botany 110: iv–vi, 2012 Plant Cuttings Available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org News in Botany: Nigel Chaffey presents a round-up of plant-based items from the world’s media Bigging-up the AoB Blog [or, Cann can – and does!] being a pronouncement by the venerable naturalist – or maybe The communication of science because of that? – the assertion was controversial at the time and (and particularly discussion not without its detractors. Nevertheless, this incident helped to thereof and thereon, which often place the notion of insect–plant co-evolution firmly onto the takes the form of post-publication agenda and started a debate that continues into the 21st century review) has many opportunities in (e.g. Miguel Rodrı´guez-Girone´sandAnaLlandres,PLoS One 3: this electronic age. One such outlet e2992, 2008). Sadly, the Great Man never lived to see his is the plethora of social networking prediction confirmed and his prescience vindicated – that only fora. In this regard I’m happy to happened in the late 20th century, but a fitting tribute to this put in a plug for the Annals of remarkable story has been produced by Joe Arditti and colleagues Botany’s own ground-breaking (Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 169: 403–432, 2012). Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/110/3/iv/2769184 by guest on 23 September 2021 work, noticeably via its blog (http://aobblog.com/), which is For many years the identity of the nectar-sucking moth was not cared for by ‘the two Alans’ – Alun Salt (http://aobblog.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Content in Floral and Extrafloral Exudates of Orchids: Pollination, Myrmecology and Chemotaxonomy Implication
    SUGAR CONTENT IN FLORAL AND EXTRAFLORAL EXUDATES OF ORCHIDS: POLLINATION, MYRMECOLOGY AND CHEMOTAXONOMY IMPLICATION BY DAVID C. JEFFREY, JOSEPH ARDITTI AND HAROLD KOOPOWITZ Department of Organismic Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92664 (Recei.ved 8 July 1969) SUMMARY Sugars present in the floral and extrafloral exudates from a number of orchid species have been analysed. All contain fructose, glucose and sucrose. Raffinose is the next most common sugar and stachyose occurs less frequently. Cellobiose, gentiobiose, lactose, maltose, melibiose, melezitose and a few large oligosaccharides may also be present. The distribution of these sugars in orchids may have some chemotaxonomic implications. There appears to be no correlation between the sugar content of exudates and orchid pollinators. This would seem to suggest that scent, form and colour are the major attractants to pollinators in orchids. Floral and extrafloral exudates in orchids may also function as attractants for ants which probably feed on them and repel grazers. INTRODUCTION Many orchids, both in their native habitat and under cultivation, secrete copious amounts of floral and extrafloral exudates or nectar (Darwin, 1904). Secretion occurs from organs of great diversity of position and structure (Darwin, 1904; Van der Pijl and Dodson, 1966; Thien, 1969). They were apparently first described as small droplets on the buds of Cattleya mendelii and called honey (Burbidge, x885). A more specific description of the exudates was given by a 'Mr. Rogers, of Sevenoakes' who informed Darwin that he had removed 'crystals of sugar of considerable size from the nectary of Aerides cornutum' (Darwin, 1904). Qualitative analyses of orchid exudates or nectars have been attempted relatively recently (Table 1).
    [Show full text]