DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Development Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Development Agreement NALCOR ENERGY and EMERA INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED MARITIME LINK – JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT July 31, 2014 A&R ML-JDA Execution Copy 17614717_1.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 INTERPRETATION ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Construction of Agreement ......................................................................................... 22 1.3 Conflicts between Parts of Agreement ....................................................................... 25 1.4 Applicable Law and Submission to Jurisdiction ........................................................... 25 1.5 Schedules..................................................................................................................... 25 1.6 Inter-Relationship with Original ML-JDA ..................................................................... 25 ARTICLE 2 BASIS AND SCOPE OF PROJECT ................................................................................... 26 2.0 Commitment to Proceed ............................................................................................. 26 2.1 Maritime Link .............................................................................................................. 26 2.2 Fundamentals of the ML Transaction ......................................................................... 28 2.3 Estimated Capital Costs of Other Defined Assets ....................................................... 28 2.4 Exclusivity .................................................................................................................... 28 2.5 True Up Adjustment .................................................................................................... 28 ARTICLE 3 PROJECT GOVERNANCE .............................................................................................. 29 3.1 Establishment of JDC-ML............................................................................................. 29 3.2 Decision Making .......................................................................................................... 29 3.3 JDC-ML Composition, Quorum, Duration and Procedures ......................................... 31 3.4 Powers of the JDC-ML ................................................................................................. 31 3.5 Meetings of JDC-ML .................................................................................................... 33 3.6 Resolution in Writing ................................................................................................... 35 3.7 Decisions of JDC-ML Binding ....................................................................................... 35 3.8 Costs of JDC-ML Participation ..................................................................................... 35 ARTICLE 4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 35 4.1 General Principles ....................................................................................................... 35 4.2 Project Director ........................................................................................................... 36 4.3 Project Manager .......................................................................................................... 36 4.4 Maritime Link Project Team ........................................................................................ 36 4.5 Reporting Obligations ................................................................................................. 37 4.6 Records and Audits...................................................................................................... 39 4.7 Access and Information ............................................................................................... 40 ARTICLE 5 PRE-COST SHARING END DATE ACTIVITIES .................................................................. 41 5.1 Pre-CSED Development Activities ............................................................................... 41 A&R ML-JDA Execution Copy 17614717_1.doc Page i 5.2 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 42 5.3 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 42 5.4 Master AFE and Budget ............................................................................................... 42 5.5 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 42 5.6 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 42 5.7 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 42 ARTICLE 6 LAND ACQUISITION AND REGULATORY APPROVALS ................................................... 43 6.1 General ........................................................................................................................ 43 6.2 Land Acquisition Plan .................................................................................................. 43 6.3 Shared Use of Transmission Corridor .......................................................................... 45 6.4 Engagement with Governments ................................................................................. 45 6.5 Environmental Approvals ............................................................................................ 45 6.6 Other Regulatory Approvals ........................................................................................ 46 6.7 Maintenance of Approvals .......................................................................................... 46 ARTICLE 7 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 47 7.1 Duties Regarding Project Implementation .................................................................. 47 7.2 Emera as Representative ............................................................................................ 48 7.3 Project Milestones ...................................................................................................... 48 7.4 Newfoundland and Labrador - Nova Scotia Benefits Agreement ............................... 49 7.5 Project Contracts ......................................................................................................... 49 7.6 Competitive Bidding .................................................................................................... 50 7.7 Terms and Conditions of Project Contracts ................................................................ 50 7.8 Commercial Operation ................................................................................................ 52 7.9 Health, Safety and Environment ................................................................................. 53 7.10 Other Obligations of Emera ........................................................................................ 53 ARTICLE 8 FINANCIAL AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................... 54 8.1 Pre-Cost Sharing End Date Work................................................................................. 54 8.2 Rights and Obligations after Cost Sharing End Date ................................................... 54 8.3 Supplemental AFEs ...................................................................................................... 56 8.4 Limitation on Scope of Project and Expenditures ....................................................... 56 8.5 Annual Work Program and Budget ............................................................................. 56 8.6 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 57 8.7 [Intentionally deleted] ................................................................................................ 57 8.8 Taxes ............................................................................................................................ 57 8.9 Financing ..................................................................................................................... 64 8.10 Invoicing and Payment ................................................................................................ 65 8.11 Other Provisions .......................................................................................................... 66 A&R ML-JDA Execution Copy 17614717_1.doc Page ii ARTICLE 9 PROJECT SUSPENSION AND DELAYS ........................................................................... 67 9.1 Suspension of ML Project ............................................................................................ 67 9.2 Delays and Notice ........................................................................................................ 67 9.3 Force Majeure ............................................................................................................. 67 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE .............................................................................................................. 68 10.1 Insurance Program .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Micmac Migration to Western Newfoundland
    MICMAC MIGRATION TO WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND DENNIS A. BARTELS Department of Anthropology Sir Wilfred Grenfell College Memorial University of Newfoundland Corner Brook, Newfoundland Canada, and OLAF UWE JANZEN Department of History Sir Wilfred Grenfell College Memorial University of Newfoundland Corner Brook, Newfoundland Canada, ABSTRACT / RESUME The Micmac of Cape Breton are known to have had a long history of seasonal contact with Newfoundland. It is generally accepted that they resided there permanently by the early 19th century. The authors review the available evidence and conclude that the permanent occupation of Newfoundland by the Micmac began in the 1760s. On sait que les Micmac de cap-Breton ont eu une longue histoire du contact saisonnier avec la Terre-Neuve. Il est généralement admis qu'ils y habitèrent en permanence au début du XIXe siècle. Les auteurs examinent l'évidence disponible et concluent que l'occupation permanente de la Terre-Neuve par les Micmac a commencé dans les années 1760. 72 Dennis A. Bartel/Olaf Uwe Janzen INTRODUCTION It is generally conceded that the Micmac of Cape Breton Island were a maritime-adapted people with sufficient seafaring skills to extend their territorial range as far into the Gulf of St. Lawrence as the Magdalen Islands and as far east as St. Pierre and Miquelon.1 By the eighteenth century, the Micmac were able to maintain a persistent presence in southern and southwestern Newfoundland. Some scholars have concluded from this that southwestern Newfoundland could have been a regular part of the territorial range of the Cape Breton Micmac since prehistoric times.2 In the absence of archaeological evidence to support such a conclusion, others, such as Marshall (1988) and Upton (1979:64) are unwilling to concede more than a seasonal exploitation of Newfoundland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of the Gulf of St. Lawrence
    Remembrance Series The Battle of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Photographs courtesy of Library and Archives Canada (LAC) and the Department of National Defence (DND). © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada represented by the Minister of Veterans Affairs, 2005. Cat. No. V32-84/2005 ISBN 0-662-69036-2 Printed in Canada The Battle of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Generations of Canadians have served our country and the world during times of war, military conflict and peace. Through their courage and sacrifice, these men and women have helped to ensure that we live in freedom and peace, while also fostering freedom and peace around the world. The Canada Remembers Program promotes a greater understanding of these Canadians’ efforts and honours the sacrifices and achievements of those who have served and those who supported our country on the home front. The program engages Canadians through the following elements: national and international ceremonies and events including Veterans’ Week activities, youth learning opportunities, educational and public information materials (including on-line learning), the maintenance of international and national Government of Canada memorials and cemeteries (including 13 First World War battlefield memorials in France and Belgium), and the provision of funeral and burial services. Canada’s involvement in the First and Second World Wars, the Korean War, and Canada’s efforts during military operations and peace efforts has always been fuelled by a commitment to protect the rights of others and to foster peace and freedom. Many Canadians have died for these beliefs, and many others have dedicated their lives to these pursuits.
    [Show full text]
  • European Exploration of North America
    European Exploration of North America Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand Learning™ & Listening Core Knowledge Language Arts® • • Arts® Language Knowledge Core Grade3 European Exploration of North America Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand GrAdE 3 Core Knowledge Language Arts® Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • CABOT's LANDFALL by C
    _J_ CABOT'S LANDFALL By C. B. FERGUSSON HILE the profound importance and the far-reaching consequences of the discovery of N ortb America by John Cabot in 1497 have long been realized, and in W some measure recognized, his landfall in the New World still remains unmarked. T hat is actually so. But it in­ dicates neither a lack of interest in doing honour to a distin­ guished navigator for his outstanding services, nor a paucity of those who have urged the marking of his landfall or advanced claims with respect to its site. His name and his fame are per­ petuated by Cabot Strait, which separates Cape Breton I sland :..... r- from Newfoundland, by the Cabot Trail, with its unsurt>assed :., , scenic splendour, in Cape Breton Island, and by Cabot 'l'ower on Signal Hill, at St. John's in Newfoundland. It is very fitting that Cabot's a.ctivities should be so com­ memorated in both Cape Breton Island and Newfoundland, for his voyages had great significance for each. Yet these me­ morials, through their different locations, may also indicate the crux of the Cabotian controversy: there is still a lack of un­ animity with respect to the site of Cabot's landfall in 1497. There are some who would claim it for Cape Breton Island, as well as others who would attribute it to Newfoundland or Labra­ dor. And now that Newfoundland is a part of the Canadian nation, these rival claims have been revived, the evidence has been re-considered and re-sifted, and, if it is now possible, a decision should be reached on this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Reorientation of Nocturnal Landbird Migrants Over the Atlantic Ocean Near Nova Scotia in Autumn
    REORIENTATION OF NOCTURNAL LANDBIRD MIGRANTS OVER THE ATLANTIC OCEAN NEAR NOVA SCOTIA IN AUTUMN W. JOHN RICHARDSON LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates,44 Eglinton Avenue West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4R 1A1 ABSTRACT.--The behavior of landbirds involved in the predominating SSW-W migration over and near Nova Scotia during autumn nights was studied by radar. Takeoff began 28 -+ 5 min after sunset. Many landbirds flew from Newfoundland across Cabot Strait to Nova Scotia and from western Nova Scotia across the Gulf of Maine toward New England. Contrary to most previous night observations, some changed course to reach land or to avoid moving offshore. However, many crossedcoasts at right or acute angles without hesitation or turning. Landbirds moved offshore on nights with offshore, alongshore, and even onshore winds. Landbirds flying SSW-W over the sea late in the night sometimesascended and/or reorientedWNW-NNE toward land, especiallywhen winds were unfavorable for continued SW flight and/or favorable for flight to the NW. Reoriented birds usually continued to arrive at the coast until noon, but the density of arrival declined steadily through the morning. Indirect but strong evidence indicates that di- rectional cues additional to sight of land were often used for reorientation. No evidence of dawn reorientation by landbirds flying SE-SSW toward the West Indies was found. Received 15 No- vember 1977, accepted 9 April 1978. LANDBIRDS that normally migrate at night often occur over the western Atlantic Ocean during autumn days (Scholander 1955). Three groups are distinguishable. First, many migrants that fly SW or WSW from near-coastal areas move offshore (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf of St. Lawrence Marine Ecosystem: an Overview of Its Structure and Dynamics, Human Pressures, and Governance Approaches
    1 ICES CM 2008/J:18 The Gulf of St. Lawrence Marine Ecosystem: An Overview of its Structure and Dynamics, Human Pressures, and Governance Approaches Michel Gilbert Fisheries and Oceans Canada Maurice Lamontagne Institute 850, Route de la Mer Mont-Joli, Quebec Canada G5H 3Z4 Tel.: (418) 775-0604 Fax: (418) 775-0546 E-mail: [email protected] Réjean Dufour Fisheries and Oceans Canada Maurice Lamontagne Institute 850, Route de la Mer Mont-Joli, Quebec Canada G5H 3Z4 Tel.: (418) 775-0623 Fax: (418) 775-0740 E-mail: [email protected] The Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence (EGSL) represents one of the largest and most productive estuarine/marine ecosystems in Canada and in the world. However, the EGSL ecosystem is affected by a wide variety of human activities that pose significant threats to its integrity and the sustainable use of its resources. These include fisheries, navigation, mariculture activities, coastal development, recreational use (including marine mammal observation), climate change, and several land–based activities that occur along the EGSL shores and in coastal and upstream rivers and tributaries, including industrial and municipal activities, agriculture, and river damming (for water level control and hydropower). In 2005, the Government of Canada initiated the Oceans Action Plan (OAP) in order to implement an ecosystem-based management approach for five Large Ocean Management Areas (LOMAs), including the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence. This presentation provides an overview of the EGSL ecosystem structure and functioning, as well as its human pressures, through a summary of the scientific tools that were developed within this initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Research Board 0 F Canada
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD 0 F CANADA MANUSCRIPT REPORT SERIES (OCEANOGRAPHIC and LIMNOLOGICAL) No. 5 TITLE THE DEEP WATERS IN THE LAUREN TIAN CHANNEL AUTHORSHIP L. M. Lauzier and R. W. Trites Establishment ATLANTI C OCEANO GRAPHIC GROUP Dated December 9th, 1957 Programmed by THE CANADIAN JOIN T COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY The Deep - aters in the Laurentian Channel by L. M. Lauzier and R. V Trites INTRODUCTION The Laurentian Channel is a deep trough that extends from the edge of the Continental Shelf through the Gulf of St. Lawrence and into the estuary of the St. Lawrence (Fig. This channel, which cuts through the Continental Shelf, separates the Grand Banks and the Scotian Shelf. From the edge of the Continental Shelf to Cabot Strait , it has depths ranging approximately from 600 to 400 metres. From Cabot Strait inward for a distance of about 400 miles, it s hallows to 200 metres and terminates abruptly in the vicinity of the Saguenay River. Cabot Strait provides the only opening to the deep waters of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. This Strait is 56 miles wide (104 km.) and has a maximum depth of 480 The cur- metres. Its cross section has an area of 35 sq. km. rents through Cabot Strait have been investigated by Dawson (1913), Sandstrom (1919), and MacGregor (1956). The circulation in Cabot Strait is featured by an outflowing current along the Cape Breton side and an inflowing current along the Newfoundland side. Dynamic calculations show strongest currents in August and least in April and May. The waters of ;he Laurentian Channel are highly stratified (Lauzier and Bailey, 1957) In the summer, a warm surface layer is superimposed on an intermediate cold-water layer over- lying a deep warm la rer.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Newfoundland & Labrador Phase Two
    SUMMARY OF NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRADORPHASE TWO MEMORIAL CONDUCT OF THE PARTffiS There is no conduct in this case that is relevant to the detennination of an equitable result. The conduct has been too sparse, ambiguous, inconsistent, and brief to meet the stringent standards required in maritime delimitation cases. Nor does it demonstrate acquiescence or estoppel. The proposals exchanged in the early years ofthe dispute were always predicated on the understanding that federal recognition ofthe parties' claims would be required. Examination of the parties' pennitting practices leads to the same conclusion. Their conduct was not mutual, consistent, or clear. First, the pennits that Newfoundland issued between 1965and 1976 disclose no defacto western boundary correspondingto any Nova Scotian easternboundary. Moreover, with the promulgation of the Newfoundland and Labrador Petroleum Regulations, 1977, all prior pennits lapsed. Thereafter Newfoundland issued no pennits in the vicinity of the potential boundary. Second, the pennits were intended to buttress ajurisdictional claim vis-a-vis the federal government. None of the pennits Newfoundland issued after 1971 granted production rights. Third, the parties' conduct was short-lived. Minister Doody's letter of October 6, 1972 demonstrates that by 1973 a dispute existed between the parties as to the existence and location of the boundary. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING (Figure 2) In the Gulf of St. Lawrence, the parties' coasts are adjacent. In the western-most portion of the Cabot Strait, the coasts are opposite. There is no striking difference or disparity between the parties' coasts in these areas. To the east the situation is more complicated. In Canada v. France, the Court noted that the "coasts of Newfoundland and Cape Breton Island from the Burin Peninsula to Scatarie Island, together with the opening to the Gulf of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Between Newfoundland & Labrador and Nova Scotia
    ARBITRATION BETWEEN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR AND NOVA SCOTIA CONCERNING PORTIONS OF THE LIMITS OF THEIR OFFSHORE AREAS AS DEFINED IN THE CANADA-NOVA SCOTIA OFFSHORE PETROLEUM RESOURCES ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT AND THE CANADA- NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT AWARD OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE SECOND PHASE Ottawa, March 26, 2002 Table of Contents Paragraph 1. Introduction (a) The Present Proceedings 1.1 (b) History of the Dispute lA (c) Findings of the Tribunal in the First Phase 1.19 (d) The Positions of the Parties in the Second Phase 1.22 2. The Applicable Law (a) The Terms of Reference 2.1 (b) The Basis of Title 2.5 (c) Applicability of the 1958 Geneva Convention on 2.19 the Continental Shelf (d) Subsequent Developments in the International Law 2.26 of Maritime Delimitation (e) The Offshore Areas beyond 200 Nautical Miles 2.29 (t) The Tribunal's Conclusions as to the Applicable Law 2.35 3. The Process of Delimitation: Preliminary Issues (a) The Conduct of the Parties 3.2 (b) The Issue of Access to Resources 3.19 4. The Geographical Context for the Delimitation: Coasts, Areas and Islands (a) General Description 4.1 (b) Identifying the Relevant Coasts and Area 4.2 (c) Situation of Offshore Islands 4.25 (i) S1.Pierre and Miquelon 4.26 (ii) S1.Paul Island 4.30 (iii) Sable Island 4.32 (iv) Other Islands Forming Potential Basepoints 4.36 5. Delimiting the Parties' Offshore Areas (a) The Initial Choice of Method 5.2 (b) The Inner Area 5A (c) The Outer Area 5.9 (d) From Cabot Strait Northwestward in the Gulf of S1.Lawrence 5.15 (e) Confirming the Equity of the Delimitation 5.16 AWARD Appendix - Technical Expert's Report 1 AWARD In the case concerning the delimitation of portions of the offshore areas between The Province of Nova Scotia and The Province of Newfoundland and Labrador THE TRIBUNAL Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Chapter Iv the Choice of a Method I. 164. 165. 166. 167
    66 CHAPTER IV THE CHOICE OF A METHOD I. Introduction 164. This Chapter is dividedinto two parts. The first is an assessmentof a provisionalequidistant line, an analysis that will both demonstrate that an equitable solution cannot be achieved through the use of that method and helpto identifysome of the key issues that arise out of the unique physicaland politicalgeography of the region. The second part willpresent the claimofN ewfoundlandandLabrador and explainwhythat claimwould resultinanequitable delimitation. 165. TheNova Scotia position has, to date, been based on the line set out in its legislation,whose status was considered in Phase One of this arbitration. At this stage, Newfoundland and Labrador is not in a position to know whether Nova Scotia willcontinueto assert that lineas the basis of its claim or whether it willpropose a new position. Accordingly,this Memorial willnot addressthe existingNova Scotia linein anydetail.TheNewfoundland andLabrador response to the Nova Scotia claim,whatever form it takes, willbe reservedto the subsequent pleadings of this Phase. 166. What must be said, however, is that the line so far claimedbyNova Scotia isunsustainableas a matter of international law. It is not based on any discernableprinciple. It is simply an indefiniteextensionofthe last segmentof the lineoutside Cabot Strait, projectedblindlyinto the outer area over vast distancesto the edge ofthe continentalshelf It is disproportionate; it disregardsthe shiftfrom opposite to adjacentcoasts asthe lineproceeds seaward; and it is constructed as if the entire coast ofN ewfoundlandoutsidethe innerconcavity didnot exist. Whilethere maybe no singlemethod that is legallycorrect under internationallaw, there are methods that are plainly wrong. The present Nova Scotia line, it is submitted, is plainly wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Modeling in the Cabot Strait - St
    GEOPHYSICAL MODELING IN THE CABOT STRAIT - ST. GEORGE’S BAY AREA BETWEEN CAPE BRETON ISLAND AND SOUTHWESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA By Louis Zsámboki Honours B. Sc. (Earth Sciences), McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario 2009 Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (Geology) Acadia University Fall Graduation 2012 © by Louis Zsámboki, 2012 This thesis by Louis Zsámboki was defended successfully in an oral examination on September 6th, 2012. The examining committee for the thesis was: __________________________________ Dr. Kirk Hillier, Chair __________________________________ Dr. Fraser Keppie, External Reader __________________________________ Dr. Robert P. Raeside, Internal Reader __________________________________ Dr. Sandra M. Barr, Supervisor __________________________________ Dr. Sonya A. Dehler, Supervisor __________________________________ Dr. Ian S. Spooner, (Acting) Head of Department This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Division of Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). ……………......................…………………. iii I, Louis Zsámboki, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I, however, retain the copyright in my thesis. ______________________________________ Author ______________________________________ Supervisor ______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbreaking Bulletin of Information and Analysis # 52 on Ship Demolition
    Shipbreaking bulletin of information and analysis # 52 on ship demolition July 31, 2018 Algolake, Algoma Olympic, Algosteel, American Victory from the North American Great Lakes to the Eastern Mediterranean January 7, 2017. © Chuck Wicklund Since the disasters of the Canadian Miner (see "Shipbreaking # 25", p 2) and Lyubov Orlova (see " Shipbreaking # 36", p 66-69), towing operations from Canada are more strictly controlled. The tugs selected are specialists in transoceanic voyages and become regular operators on the Canada-Turkey Line, as he VB Hispania in charge of the Algoma Olympic and the American Victory. The fact remains that conveying Canadian lakers from the St. Lawrence to the Eastern Mediteranean on a 9,000 km-long journey entails risks, and is an additional source of air pollution and CO2 emissions despite the fact local solutions are available or developping such as Marine Recycling Corp facilities in Port Colborne, Ontario, and Sydney, Nova Scotia See p 72-74 Robin des Bois - 1 - Shipbreaking # 52 – July 2018 Shipbreaking # 52, from April 1 to June 30, 2018 Content Relapse in Pakistan 2 Reefer 37 Heading for Africa n°2 3 Offshore service vessel: supply, pipe-layer vessel 40 Shipwrecks on Lake Victoria 3 support vessel, seismic research vessel Shipwrecks in Kenya and Tanzanie 5 Oil tanker 49 Europe is looking for its course 7 Chemical tanker 63 Military and auxiliary vessels on the beach 9 Gas carrier 65 2nd quarter 2018 overview 12 Combination carrier ( 70 tug 15 Bulk carrier 71 Ferry /passenger ship 16 Algoma Central Corp 72 Livestock carrier 20 Cheshire 75 Heavy load carrier 21 Cement carrier 77 Dredger 21 Ro Ro 78 General cargo carrier 23 Car carrier 79 Shipwrecks in Turkey 28 The END: the four lives of the American Victory 80 Ocean Jasper/Sokalique 31 Container ship 35 Sources 84 Relapse in Pakistan May 6, 2018 © Gadani Ship Breaking July 16, 2018.
    [Show full text]