DOCSLIB.ORG

Unarmed Cananefates?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unarmed Cananefates? Unarmed Cananefates? Roman military equipment and horse gear from non military context in the civitas Cananefatium. Julius van Roemburg Front cover illustration: bronze umbo from Rotterdam (Photo Boor: Rotterdam). Unarmed Cananefates? Roman military equipment and horse gear from non military context in the civitas Cananefatium. MA-Thesis University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Master Programme: Archaeology of North-western Europe Supervisors: Drs. J. de Bruin/Dr. S. Heeren Julius van Roemburg Student number: 0233285 Leidschendam, 15 December 2011 - Unarmed Cananefates? - Contents Preface 5 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Research background 7 1.1.1 Armed Batavians 9 1.1.2 Unarmed Cananefates? 10 1.2 Research objectives and questions 11 1.3 Research methods: overview 12 1.4 Research area 13 1.5 Thesis structure 14 2. The civitas Cananefatium: an overview of the research area and the 15 involvement of Cananefates with the Roman army. 2.1 The Cananefates 15 2.2 Tribal areas and civitates in the Netherlands 16 2.3 Geology and landscape 17 2.4 Settlement pattern and civilian sites 19 2.5 Chronological development and size of population 22 2.6 Military installations and military occupation in the civitas Cananefatium 24 2.7 Recruitment and the Cananefatian auxilia units 27 3. Roman military equipment 37 3.1 The typology of Nicolay 37 3.2. Critique on the typology of Nicolay and recent developments in the field 45 of Roman military equipment studies 4. Roman military equipment from the civitas Cananefatium 49 4.1 Survey method and completeness 49 4.2 Archaeological collection methods of the finds 51 4.3 Data overview: find contexts 52 4.4 Chronological and spatial patterns 57 4.4.1 Chronological patterns of military equipment: weaponry 58 4.4.2 Chronological patterns of military equipment: suspension 60 4.4.3 Chronological patterns of horse gear 63 3 - Unarmed Cananefates? - 4.5. The sites: rural settlements 66 4.5.1 Recognizing military sites and veterans 67 4.5.2 Rural Settlements in the limes zone 68 4.5.3 Rural Settlements along the Meuse banks 70 4.5.4 Rural Settlements in the Westland and Midden-Delfland clay 73 area (Gantel system) 4.5.5 Rural Settlements in the beach barrier area 82 4.5.6 Rural settlement summary 86 4.6 Urban centres: Forum Hadriani 87 4.7 Cemeteries 92 4.8 Cult places 92 4.9 Rivers 93 4.9.1 The Rhine 93 4.9.2 The Meuse estuary 97 4.9.3 River finds comparison 98 4.10 Chronological patterns of the different find contexts 99 101 5. Cananefates vs. Batavians 5.1 Representativeness of the data sets for comparison 101 5.2 Chronological comparison 106 5.3 Context comparison 109 5.4 Conclusion 116 6. Conclusions 119 6.1 Further research 127 Abstract 129 Bibliography 131 List of figures 147 List of tables 151 Appendix 1: The sites 153 Appendix 2: Typology of Roman military equipment and horse gear 155 Appendix 3: Data 163 Appendix 4: Plates 4 - Unarmed Cananefates? - Preface When you have the same name as one of the most famous Romans and also study archaeology, you can expect a few jokes coming your way. Furthermore, everybody will expect you to specialize in (provincial) Roman Archaeology. I do not know if those jokes and expectations played a role, but in the earlier years of my study I actually tried to steer clear of Roman archaeology. However, over time, archaeological fieldwork kept throwing Roman archaeology at my feet. It started with the fieldschool at Den Haag Uithofslaan VP3, followed by fieldwork at Roman period settlements at Naaldwijk Zuidweg, Midden-Delfland Harnaschpolder, Roman roads in Utrecht, Roman period dams with culverts at Bernisse, the fortress at Vechten, and very recently Naaldwijk again. Before I knew it, I was completely “hooked ”. Although I initially intended to focus my research on the transition period from the Iron Age to the Roman period in Zuid-Holland, a period that is still poorly understood, the lack of material forced me to change my plans. Therefore, this thesis mainly concerns Roman military equipment from civilian contexts of the late 1 st to early 3 rd century AD. This research would never have been possible without the cooperation of many people working at the various archaeological companies, municipal services, museums, depots etc. I especially would like to thank Jean Paul Bakx (erfgoed Delft), Jeroen van Zoolingen & Ab Waasdorp (gemeente Den Haag), Tim de Ridder (Vlak), Hans Koot (gemeente Rijswijk), Kees Herweijer (BOOR), Ton Immerzeel & C. van der Doef (Westlands Museum), Lourens van der Feijst (ADC), Tiziano Goossens & Michiel Goddijn (Archol), Heleen van Londen, Mark Driessen & Stefanie Hoss (University of Amsterdam), Daphne Smits (BAAC) and Jasper de Bruin (Leiden University Leiden). Furthermore, I like to thank the various sections of AWN. It was my intention to include as many private collections as possible. To be honest, I am not completely sure whether I succeeded or not. However, I have met a number of very friendly and cooperative amateur archaeologists, who, sometimes without even having any military equipment or horse gear in their collections, helped me a great deal in understanding the metal detecting situation in Zuid-Holland. My colleagues at RAAP West have been a great help by relentlessly inquiring about my progress, although for one the motivation for doing so seemed to be the cake and graduation party. But more importantly, the many discussions about the subject were invaluable. Special thanks go out to Jan Albert Schenk and especially Geuch de Boer for their help with the maps. 5 - Unarmed Cananefates? - But most importantly, I have to thank Esther for her unending patience and her help to keep me on track when I was lost in the most remote corners of the Roman Empire in search of more information. And finally, although it will take many years before she can read this, I have to thank little Erlijn, for the motivation to see this to a good end. 6 - Unarmed Cananefates? - 1. Introduction Since in 1992 the Valletta treaty was signed, the Dutch archaeological world started to change and saw the introduction of (semi) commercially operating companies. This resulted roughly a decade later in a considerably increased volume of research. However, the new (semi)commercial approach is often criticized for being less or not scientific, as it is driven by modern day infrastructural developments and not necessarily by scientific research questions (e.g. Bazelmans 2009; KNAW 2007; Raemaekers 2008) . On the other hand, the new system is responsible for a substantial part of the research taking place in areas and locations, which have been largely neglected by the ‘traditional ’ scientific archaeological world with unsuspected results on a regular basis. 1.1 Research background. During the last few decades, a tremendous amount of research has been carried out focusing on the rural communities during the Roman period in the Netherlands. Recurring themes in this research are Romanization and identity (Roymans 1996; 2004). Unfortunately, this research is very unevenly distributed over the Netherlands as the majority of these studies are focused on the Batavian region in the Dutch Eastern River Area (Heeren 2009; Nicolay 2007; Roymans 2004; Vos 2009; Willems 1981; 1984). This high degree of attention for the Batavians is not surprising. Firstly, a wealth of historical sources mention the Batavians, e.g. Historiae, Annales, Germania (Tacitus). According to Tacitus, the Batavians were exempt from regular taxes (at least for the 1 st century), based on an old treaty with Rome ( civitas antiqua ). Instead, they supplied a high number of troops for the auxilia (8 cohors and 1 ala ) and a substantial part of the emperors ’ bodyguard. 1 In doing so, the Batavians were the principal supplier of Roman troops in Northern Gaul (Nicolay 2007, 7). The historical authors emphasize their prominent military role and martial prowess, e.g. ‘they [Batavians] are like weapons and armor – only to be used in war ’ (Tacitu s, Germ. 29). Furthermore, the historical sources give an exceptional detailed account of the Batavian revolt of AD 69, in which the Batavians and their allies laid waste to parts of the Rhine limes . 1 The possibility of regular taxes being collected in the Batavian area during the 2 nd century AD has recently been demonstrated (Groot et. al. 2009). 7 - Unarmed Cananefates? - Secondly, the epigraphic (military) evidence on the Batavians (veteran diploma’s, gravestones, etc) found throughout the area of the Roman Empire is abundant and detailed (Derks 2009) providing an important secondary source for researchers. Thirdly, the Batavian region contains well preserved sites with excellent preserved bones and metals (including military equipment) that have been systematically mapped (Willem 1981), providing another key source for researchers. These sources and evidence have served to shape the Batavian image of an exceptionally warlike “warrior elite ”. However, do the Batavians indeed have this exceptional martial identity or is that a general characteristic for all the communities along the Roman Rhine limes ? In other words, are the Batavians representative for the other communities along the Roman Rhine limes ? Hardly any overview studies have been made about the other known tribal areas or civitates in the Netherlands. For example, the Batavian western neighbors, the Cananefates, only received fragmentary attention (as stated by Bazelmans and De Jonge 2006, 39). In the Dutch Archaeological Research Agenda chapter on the limes (Van Enckevort and Vos 2006), the Cananefates are not mentioned at all in the text, although the limes coincides with the northern border of the civitas Cananefatium. The Batavians, on the other hand, are mentioned over twenty times. Furthermore, the first synthesizing work about the Cananefatian area, published in 1978 by Bloemers, is still a principal source, despite being 32 years old.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Voorburg-Arentsburg : Forum Hadriani *)
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/26485 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-29 and may be subject to change. VOORBURG-ARENTSBURG : FORUM HADRIANI *) Keizer Hadrianus heeft, waarschijnlijk in 120 of 121, in het woongebied van de Canane- fates een marktplaats gesticht, of aan een reeds bestaande nederzetting marktrecht geschon­ ken : Forum Hadriani. Deze nederzetting is tevens de hoofdplaats geweest van de civitas der Cananefates. Nog tijdens de regering van Hadrianus(?) of liever onder Antoninus Pius of Marcus Aurelius, op zijn laatst in 162, is deze plaats tot municipium verheven. De officiële naam Inidde sindsdien Municipium Aelium of Aurelium Cananefat(i)um, M.A.C. op een mijl­ paal die omstreeks 1500 gevonden is in het land der Cananefates, te Monster of Naaldwijk, en die is opgericht in 162 tijdens de regering van Marcus Aurelius en zijn adoptief broer Lucius Verus 1). De naam Forum Hadriani bleef daarnaast gehandhaafd, zoals blijkt uit de vermelding van deze plaatsnaam op de Tabula Peutingeriana, in een inscriptie op een askist uit de 3de eeuw, die gevonden is in Pannonia Superior 2), en in het opschrift van de in 1963 te Rijswijk (Z.-H.) ontdekte mijlpaal, die dateert uit 250 na Chr., uit de regeringstijd van Decius 3). Deze laatste vondst heeft opnieuw het probleem van de lokalisering van Forum Hadriani onder de aandacht gebracht. In de Bonner Jahrbücher 164, 1964 werd naar aanleiding van de mijlpaal van Rijswijk 4) betoogd dat Forum Hadriani in of bij Voorburg (zie afb.) heeft gelegen, niet ver van de plaats waar ten westen van de Vliet, d.i.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans and Batavians: Regional Developments at the Imperial Frontier
    ROMANS AND BATAVIANS: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS AT THE IMPERIAL FRONTIER WillemJ.H. Willems The Batavians are certainly among the most well-known tribes in the Roman empire, both in antiquity and today. Their relation with the Romans has been the subject of much scholarly discussion in the past and the present, but most of this discussion was based primarily on literary data. With the exception of the work of Modderman (1949, 1951), however, no effort has been made to substanriate the archaeological data-base of the Batavian tribal area in the eastern part of the Dutch Rhine delta. Fortunately, in 1978 a detailed study of all archaeological evidence of the central part of this area could be starled. On the basis of the preliminary results of this project, it is now pos- sible to examine some of the archaeological correlates of the acculturation processes which operated here from the Late Iron Age to the Early Middle Ages (c. 250 B.C. - A.D. 750). But first it is necessary to examine some of the theoretical concepts invol- ved. Since the 1954 SSRC Seminar, acculturation is often defined as culture change that is initiated by the conjunction of two or more autonomous cultural systems. In our case it is evident that the differences between the cultural systems involved are very large in- deed (below p. 112 and Roymans this vol.). On the one hand is a system which may be described as a state, while on the other hand we are dealing with a society at a much lower level of social complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Tilburg-5.Indd 27 28-07-15 17:26 Van Tilburg-5.Indd 28 28-07-15 17:26 Traffi C Policy and Circulation in Roman Cities
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/35894 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Tilburg, Cornelis Richard van Title: Streets and streams : health conditions and city planning in the Graeco-Roman world Issue Date: 2015-10-14 I. CITY AND TRAFFIC van Tilburg-5.indd 27 28-07-15 17:26 van Tilburg-5.indd 28 28-07-15 17:26 Traffi c Policy and Circulation in Roman Cities van Tilburg-5.indd 29 28-07-15 17:26 CITY AND TRAFFIC Context In 2007, I published Traffi c and Congestion in the Roman Empire (second edition 2012). Th is book was the reason for the CASA/KVSA (Classical Association of South Africa/Klassieke Vereniging van Suid-Afrika) to invite me to present a paper, enti- tled ‘Traffi c Policy in Roman Cities’, at the biennial conference ‘Aspects of Empire’, 2-5 July 2007, held at the University of Cape Town. Th is paper was the basis of the following chapter. Since then, more books and articles on this theme have been published.1 How- ever, the majority of these articles are restricted to the situation in Pompeii , the best preserved ancient Roman city. In 2011, however, a volume was published by R. Lau- rence and D.J. Newsome, in which – besides Pompeii – traffi c aspects of Rome and Ostia are discussed.2 For a positive review see R. Benefi el (2012): ‘this is a beautifully produced book that moves its reader onto and through the streets of the Roman city’.3 However, I agree with a more critical opinion by M.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeinen in Katwijk Knooppunt in Een Wereldrijk Parklaan Landschapsarchitecten B.V
    Romeinen in Katwijk Knooppunt in een wereldrijk Parklaan Landschapsarchitecten b.v. T: 073 - 614 01 91 weleer Vughterstraat 221 E: [email protected] erfgoedcommunicatie 5211 GD Den Bosch I: www.parklaan.nl Romeinen in Katwijk Knooppunt in een wereldrijk Een visie op de communicatie van de Romeinse Limes in de gemeente Katwijk voorblad; Katwijk en Brittenburg, van Goyen 1627 februari 2016 1. Aanleiding Verschillende rijks- en provinciale overheden werken op Om het streven naar draagvlak voor het Nederlandse plannen, waarbij elke gemeente een eigen accent of thema landelijk niveau samen om het Nederlandse deel van de deel van de Limes vorm te geven is in 2012 het landelijke kan hebben. Limes, de noordgrens van het Romeinse Rijk, op de UNES- ‘Uitvoeringsprogramma Publieksbereik Romeinse Limes’ CO-werelderfgoedlijst te krijgen. In januari 2014 heeft de opgesteld. De provincie Zuid-Holland heeft bovendien in De provincie Zuid-Holland heeft de erfgoedlijn Limes uitge- gemeente Katwijk daartoe de Intentieverklaring Werelderf- 2013 het Uitvoeringsprogramma Erfgoedlijnen (2013-2016) werkt in het document Romeinse Limes Zuid-Holland, visie goednominatie Romeinse Limes ondertekend1 . De prelude vastgesteld. Alle investeringen in erfgoed in deze periode 2020, meerjarenprogramma 2014-2016. Katwijk wordt in dit hiervan luidt: worden geconcentreerd op zeven erfgoedlijnen, met als beleidsstuk genoemd als te ontwikkelen recreatief-toeris- De Romeinse Limes, de noordgrens van het Romeinse uitgangspunt het streven naar beschermen, beleven en tisch Limesknooppunt. De Limes moet beleefbaar, bekend, Rijk, is de grootste lineaire archeologische structuur in benutten. Eén van die erfgoedlijnen is de Romeinse Limes. bereikbaar en benut worden. Naast de dynamische limes Europa. Een indrukwekkend restant van dit verleden is de Katwijk is daarbinnen door de provincie Zuid-Holland recent is de Oude Romeinse waterbaan belangrijk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine: Germany's River, Not Germany's Boundary
    Source: E.M. Arndt, Deutschlands Fluss, aber nicht Deutschlands Gränze, English trl. UvA Talen / SPIN. the French was as bad as it was foolish. One would have The Rhine: Germany’s river, not Germany’s thought that ten years, indeed twenty years, of blindness and misfortune might have sent a little light into their dark minds boundary and brought the errants back into line, especially since the French had long ago overturned their own proof, but far from it. There are still many who behave, indeed who exhaust Ernst Moritz Arndt themselves in deductions and proofs, as if the Rhine as the border between France and Germany is something indispu- table and settled. So effective is constant repetition, and so little are most Germans – who pride themselves on their ‘The Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ is what Sully proved profundity in thought and speech – accustomed to thinking. 1600 and 1610; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ The empty echoing of foreign opinions, especially the proclaimed Richelieu in 1625 and 1635; ‘the Rhine is France’s echoing of French hocus-pocus and sophistries, has sadly natural boundary,’ declared Count d’Avaux in the 1640s at become too much of a fashion on this side of the Rhine, in Münster, in the holy places where Hermann the Cheruscan had the country where thoroughness and depth of thought is once made a dufferent typeof declaration to the Romans; ‘the supposed to reside. Given this state of affairs, especially this Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ resounded from 1670 to sad state of German minds and hearts, I consider it not super- 1700 in Louvois’ and Colbert’s speeches in Louis XIV’s council fluous to present our ancient, magnificent and holy River of state, and the court poets Boileau and Racine sang it in the Rhine, what it was, is and will be, to the good German antechamber; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ cried the people, who are confused by too many political prattlers and monsters on the Seine from 1790 to 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.00 Download Free
    This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA 45 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd I 16/07/15 13:00 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd II 16/07/15 13:00 ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY EXCERPTA ARCHAEOLOGICA LEIDENSIA EDITED BY CORRIE BAKELS AND HANS KAMERMANS LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2015 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd III 16/07/15 13:00 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Editor of illustrations: Joanne Porck Copyright 2015 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-822251-2-9 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia can be ordered at: P.J.R. Modderman Stichting Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9514 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd IV 16/07/15 13:00 Contents The stable isotopes 13C and 15N in faunal bone of the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen (Germany): statistical modeling 1 Juliette Funck Thijs van Kolfschoten Hans van der Plicht ‘Trapping the past’? Hunting for remote capture techniques and planned coastal exploitation during MIS 5 at Blombos Cave and Klasies River, South Africa 15 Gerrit L. Dusseldorp Geeske H.J. Langejans A Late Neolithic Single Grave Culture burial from Twello (central Netherlands): environmental setting, burial ritual and contextualisation 29 Lucas Meurkens Roy van Beek Marieke Doorenbosch Harry
    [Show full text]
  • Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F
    Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F. Bloemers, 1995 Introduction The map covers a large part of what Ptolemy (2.Prolog.; 2.11) called Germania Megale, that immense part of Germania outside the formal north-west limits of the Roman empire, bordered by the North Sea and Baltic Sea. During the Roman period the landscape was, as elsewhere, quite different from the present; in this region the coast, estuaries, rivers and moors deserve special attention. Long-known historical information has to be combined with knowledge acquired after World War II by intensive geological and palaeogeographical research in the Netherlands and northern Germany. Due to the rise in sea level and post-Roman shoreline changes, the coast along the southern North Sea has changed considerably since the Roman period, retreating landwards. In general, with the help of well-founded geological data, it can now be reconstructed in advance of the present-day shoreline (Kossack 1984, 51-82; van Es 1988, 88-94). Even so, it still seems prudent to render long stretches as approximate. In antiquity, principal rivers such as the Rhenus, Visurgis and Albis spread over wide flood-plains, but are now channeled between embankments. Large areas in the north of the modern Netherlands and Germany were covered by peat, and consequently almost inaccessible. Today, these are drained and cultivated, with the result that the ground level is now many feet lower than during Roman times. In addition, ancient Germania Megale was famous for its extensive, dense forests. All the Greek and Roman texts relating to the region are conveniently assembled by Byvanck (1931) and Goetz (1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Plangebied Besjeslaan 3 Te Leiden
    Plangebied Besjeslaan 3, Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo G.H. de Boer Archol 489 Archol Plangebied Besjeslaan 3 te Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo G.H. de Boer Colofon Archol Rapport 489 Plangebied Besjeslaan 3, Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo Projectleiding: drs. A.J. Tol Auteur: ir. G.H. de Boer Tekstredactie drs. A.J. Tol Beeldmateriaal: ir. G.H de Boer Opmaak: A.J. Allen Druk: Haveka, Alblasserdam / Archol bv, Leiden Autorisatie: drs. A.J. Tol Handtekening ISSN 1569-2396 © Archol, Leiden 2019 Einsteinweg 2 2333 CC Leiden [email protected] Tel. 071 527 33 13 Inhoudsopgave Samenvatting 5 1 Inleiding 7 1.1 Aanleiding en doelstelling 7 1.2 Ligging plangebied en bouwplannen 8 1.3 Onderzoeksopzet en organisatie 10 2 Bekende gegevens 13 2.1 Landschappelijk kader 13 2.2 Archeologisch kader en verwachte bodemopbouw 14 2.3 Mogelijke verstoringen 16 3 Verkennend booronderzoek 17 3.1 Doel en vraagstellingen 17 3.2 Methodiek 17 3.3 Resultaten 19 3.3.1 Algemeen 19 3.3.2 Bodemopbouw 20 3.4 Interpretatie 25 4 Conclusie 27 4.1 Onderzoeksvragen 27 4.2 Advies 29 Literatuur 31 Figurenlijst 33 Tabellenlijst 33 Bijlage 1 Boorkolommen 35 BESJESLAAN 5 Samenvatting In opdracht van de familie Langezaal heeft Archol BV een inventariserend archeologisch veldonderzoek (verkennende fase door middel van boringen) uitgevoerd op het perceel Besjeslaan 3 te Leiden. Aanleiding voor het onderzoek is de voorgenomen sloop van de huidige woning en de bouw van een nieuwe woning op globaal dezelfde locatie.
    [Show full text]
  • Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia and Single Volumes Can Be Ordered At
    ANALECTA Thijs van Kolfschoten, Wil Roebroeks, Dimitri De Loecker, Michael H. Field, Pál Sümegi, Kay C.J. Beets, Simon R. Troelstra, Alexander Verpoorte, Bleda S. Düring, Eva Visser, Sophie Tews, Sofia Taipale, Corijanne Slappendel, Esther Rogmans, Andrea Raat, Olivier Nieuwen- huyse, Anna Meens, Lennart Kruijer, Harmen Huigens, Neeke Hammers, Merel Brüning, Peter M.M.G. Akkermans, Pieter van de Velde, Hans van der Plicht, Annelou van Gijn, Miranda de Kreek, Eric Dullaart, Joanne Mol, Hans Kamermans, Walter Laan, Milco Wansleeben, Alexander Verpoorte, Ilona Bausch, Diederik J.W. Meijer, Luc Amkreutz, Bertil van Os, Liesbeth Theunissen, David R. Fontijn, Patrick Valentijn, Richard Jansen, Simone A.M. Lemmers, David R. Fontijn, Sasja A. van der Vaart, Harry Fokkens, Corrie Bakels, L. Bouke van der Meer, Clasina J.G. van Doorn, Reinder Neef, Federica Fantone, René T.J. Cappers, Jasper de Bruin, Eric M. Moormann, Paul G.P. PRAEHISTORICA Meyboom, Lisa C. Götz, Léon J. Coret, Natascha Sojc, Stijn van As, Richard Jansen, Maarten E.R.G.N. Jansen, Menno L.P. Hoogland, Corinne L. Hofman, Alexander Geurds, Laura N.K. van Broekhoven, Arie Boomert, John Bintliff, Sjoerd van der Linde, Monique van den Dries, Willem J.H. Willems, Thijs van Kolfschoten, Wil Roebroeks, Dimitri De Loecker, Michael H. Field, Pál Sümegi, Kay C.J. Beets, Simon R. Troelstra, Alexander Verpoorte, Bleda S. Düring, Eva Visser, Sophie Tews, Sofia Taipale, Corijanne Slappendel, Esther Rogmans, Andrea Raat, Olivier Nieuwenhuyse, Anna Meens, Lennart Kruijer, Harmen Huigens, Neeke Hammers, Merel Brüning, Peter M.M.G. Akkermans, Pieter van de Velde, Hans van der Plicht, Annelou van Gijn, Miranda de Kreek, Eric Dullaart, Joanne Mol, Hans Kamermans, Walter Laan, Milco Wansleeben, Alexander Verpoorte, Ilona Bausch, Diederik J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Van Tekst
    Voorloopige lijst der Nederlandsche monumenten van geschiedenis en kunst. Deel III. De provincie Zuidholland bron Voorloopige lijst der Nederlandsche monumenten van geschiedenis en kunst. Deel III. De provincie Zuidholland. A. Oosthoek, Utrecht 1915 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_voo016voor12_01/colofon.php © 2013 dbnl i.s.m. V Voorwoord. Bij Koninklijk Besluit van 7 Juli 1903, No. 44, werd ingesteld eene Rijkscommissie tot het opmaken en uitgeven van een inventaris en eene beschrijving van de Nederlandsche monumenten van Geschiedenis en Kunst. De taak dezer Rijkscommissie is: het samenstellen en uitgeven eener geïllustreerde beschrijving van alle in Nederland aanwezige gebouwen en voorwerpen, dagteekenend van vóór 1850, die belang bezitten als uiting van kunst of om eene er aan verbonden historische herinnering. Aldus zal worden verkregen een handboek, waarin men over de aanwezigheid, de artistieke of historische waarde en den toestand der monumenten van geschiedenis en kunst uitvoerige inlichting kan vinden en tegelijkertijd een volledige en betrouwbare bron voor de Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis. Ten einde dit groote werk, dat vele jaren zal vorderen, met meer kennis van zaken te kunnen ondernemen en tevens zoo spoedig mogelijk een overzicht te geven van al wat het behouden waard is, besloot de Rijkscommissie eene ‘Voorloopige Lijst’ der monumenten te bewerken, waarin gebouwen en met gebouwen samenhangende voorwerpen alleen kort worden vermeld. Voor het thans verschijnend derde deel dezer lijst1), bevattende de monumenten der provincie Zuidholland, zijn de gegevens, met uitzondering van die betreffende de gemeenten Delft en 's-Gravenhage, door onderzoek ter plaatse van 1904 tot 1909 verzameld door Mr. Dr. J.C. OVERVOORDE.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarboekje 1933
    JAARBOEKJE JAARBOEKJE VOOR GESCHIEDENIS EN OUDHEIDKUNDE VAN LEIDEN EN RIJNLAND TEVENS ORGAAN VAN DE VEREENIGING ,,OUD-LEIDEN” 1932-1933 (VIJF-EN-TWINTIGSTE DEEL) LEIDEN - P. J. MULDER & ZOON EEN WOORD VOORAF Tot onze blijdschap kunnen wij het jaarboekje weder wat vroeger doen verschijnen en hopen zeer, dat het de belangstelling in en de kennis van onze stad en haar vroegere schoonheid zal vermeerderen. Daarom ook meenden wij goed te doen voortaan eene lijst te geven van nieuw verschenen werken over de stad en hare omgeving. Ons rest alleen nog zoowel aan onze medewerkers als aan onzen uitgever onzen welgemeenden dank te betuigen. M AART 1933. DE REDACTIE. VEREENIGING ,,OUD-LEIDEN” Verslag over het jaar 1932 De Voorzitter Prof. Mr. D. van Blom heeft gemeend wegens zeer vermeerderde werkzaamheden zijne functie te moeten neerleggen en werd opgevolgd door Prof. Dr. L. Knappert. In plaats van den heer Aug. L. Reimeringer, die de gemeente metterwoon heeft verlaten, is door het College van Burgemeester en Wethouders als lid van het Bestuur aangewezen de Burgemeester, Mr. A. van de Sande Bakhuyzen, die zich deze benoeming heeft laten welgevallen. Evenzoo is Mr. J. J. van der Lip door het Collegium van het Leidsch Studentencorps vervangen door den heer E. Pelinck. Door Dr. M. D. Ozinga werd een lezing gehouden over ,,Leidsche Kerken”, door Mr. J. W. Verburgt over ,,Het leven van Jan Pietersz. Dou als burger, landmeter, wijnroeier en notaris van Leiden 1573- 1635” en door Mevrouw M. L. H. Eerdbeek-Claasen over ,Rijnsburg, dorp en abdij”; de beide eerste lezingen hadden plaats in Februari en Maart, de laatste in December.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell
    1st Century AD Roman Soldier VERSUS Germanic Warrior Lindsay Powell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 1st Century ad Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay PowellPowell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION 4 THE OPPOSING SIDES 10 Recruitment and motivation t Morale and logistics t Training, doctrine and tactics Leadership and communications t Use of allies and auxiliaries TEUTOBURG PASS 28 Summer AD 9 IDISTAVISO 41 Summer AD 16 THE ANGRIVARIAN WALL 57 Summer AD 16 ANALYSIS 71 Leadership t Mission objectives and strategies t Planning and preparation Tactics, combat doctrine and weapons AFTERMATH 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com Introduction ‘Who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italia for Germania, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?’ (Tacitus, Germania 2). This negative perception of Germania – the modern Netherlands and Germany – lay behind the reluctance of Rome’s great military commanders to tame its immense wilderness. Caius Iulius Caesar famously threw a wooden pontoon bridge across the River Rhine (Rhenus) in just ten days, not once but twice, in 55 and 53 bc. The next Roman general to do so was Marcus Agrippa, in 39/38 bc or 19/18 bc. However, none of these missions was for conquest, but in response to pleas for assistance from an ally of the Romans, the Germanic nation of the Ubii. It was not until the reign of Caesar Augustus that a serious attempt was made to annex the land beyond the wide river and transform it into a province fit for Romans to live in.
    [Show full text]