Properties of Constructed Soils Along Four-Lane Highways in West Virginia1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Properties of Constructed Soils Along Four-Lane Highways in West Virginia1 Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2004 PROPERTIES OF CONSTRUCTED SOILS ALONG FOUR-LANE HIGHWAYS IN WEST VIRGINIA1 Rosa Lee Miller and John C. Sencindiver2 Abstract. Four-lane highways have been constructed in West Virginia since the 1960’s. During the early construction periods of four-lane highways, geologic information was not assessed, nor was the effect of the disturbance of these geologic materials on soil quality established prior to construction activities. Due to the mountainous topography of the Central Appalachian region, the construction of four-lane highways requires large, expansive cut and fill areas that may contain acid or alkaline producing materials. The disturbance and mixing of these materials with the original soil produces “new” soil that differs considerably from the surrounding native soil. In order to evaluate highway substrate conditions and the development processes of these new soils, study areas along sections of highways have been selected for comparison based on differences in age and geologic parent materials. The long-term goal of this research is to improve selective soil handling of earth excavated during highway construction similar to that of mine overburden materials. Cut, fill and on-grade areas within sections of Interstates 68, 79, and 81 and Corridor H (U.S. Route 33 and State Route 55) have been randomly selected as sampling sites. Soil pits located at 10- m increments along transects perpendicular to these four-lane highways have been sampled at 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm depths and described according to USDA methods. Surface samples also were taken near the edge of the highway. Field pH values of all sites ranged from 5 to 8. Preliminary analysis of the data suggests that thin A horizons develop within 1 to 2 years in rapidly weathering surface materials. In these young soils, little development is observed beneath a weakly developed A horizon, commonly creating an A-C1-C2 or A-AC-C horizon sequence. Soils of intermediate ages (9-12 yrs) were similar to young soils, although at some sites a more developed soil profile was occasionally observed (A-Bw-C1-C2). The most developed soil profiles were observed on sites where soils had been constructed 25 to 43 years ago. At these locations, multiple B horizon sequences were common creating A-Bw1-Bw2-C or A-Bw- BC-C horizons. Additional Key Words: Soil quality, soil development, disturbed soils, minesoils, soil genesis. 1 Paper was presented at the 2004 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation and The 25th West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force, April 18-24, 2004. Published by ASMR, 3134 Montavesta Rd., Lexington, KY 40502. 2 Rosa Lee Miller is a research assistant and John C. Sencindiver is a professor in the Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2004 pp 1315-1337 DOI: 10.21000/JASMR04011315 1315 Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2004 Introduction Highway construction disturbs long linear strips that cross a variety of soil and geologic materials. Therefore, soil placement and handling problems are unique. Many completely different micro sites may be generated over short distances. Some areas along highway corridors remain bare of vegetation, even after periods of greater than 25 years have passed since construction. With prior knowledge of these potential problem areas, engineers and planners would be able to develop alternative methods of soil and rock handling. For instance, analysis of soils and geologic materials in advance of highway construction, similar to that required for surface coal mining operations, would assist in the prediction of problem areas for the establishment of vegetation for effective sediment and erosion control. Because soils along highway corridors are disturbed in a similar way as surface coal mining, these two different activities are comparable. Disturbed soils have distinctly different morphological features when compared to contiguous native soils. Disturbed soil properties are the result of various blasting and soil/rock handling and placement procedures employed as well as the consequent natural soil formation functions of time, topography, parent material, biological activity, and climate. These disturbed soils are in theory quite “young” in the sense that time has not fully acted upon them, and they have not yet reached a state of equilibrium with the environment. However, several studies have noted that surface horizonation is evident in as little as three years post disturbance creating an A-C horizon sequence (Ciolkosz et al., 1985; Daniels and Amos, 1981; Shafer, 1980; Sencindiver and Ammons, 2000; Thurman and Sencindiver, 1986). This trend is credited to the acceleration of the soil physical and chemical processes performed by air, water and plant roots acting upon consolidated rock at the surface or near surface of disturbed soils (Sencindiver and Ammons, 2000). Seventeen of 29 pedons described in Pennsylvania minesoils, aged 1 to 29 years had AC or Bw subsurface horizons (Ciolkosz et al., 1985). Haering et al. (1993) observed Bw horizons in minesoils constructed from coal overburden strata consisting of siltstone, but in material containing more than 25% sandstone, only A, AC and C horizons were evident. The importance of soil texture to chemical and physical properties, such as nutrient and water behavior is well documented. Sobek et al. (1978) observed that minesoil properties were closer to their parent material properties than natural soils were to their parent material properties. The texture of soils disturbed by mining 1316 Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2004 operations and road construction is directly related to the geologic materials disturbed and may be sandy, if derived of sandstone, or silty, if derived of siltstone. Successful reclamation along highways is dependent upon a thorough knowledge of the individual soil and site properties that must be stabilized and a prediction of how the soils will behave over time (Booze-Daniels et al., 2000). Soils on cut areas will be thinner than the native soils; therefore, vegetation will have a smaller volume of soil from which to absorb water and nutrients. Soils on fill areas may be thicker than soils on cut and on-grade areas, so effective plant rooting should not be restricted by unbroken parent material or underlying rock. Compacted zones may perch water tables during wet weather conditions causing saturation and anaerobic conditions within the rooting zone. In a study of older mine soils (5-20 years old) at the Powell River Project watershed in southwest Virginia, compaction was the most significant soil factor limiting successful long-term revegetation (Daniels and Zipper, 1997). Severely compacted mine soils, especially those with less than 60 cm of effective rooting depth, cannot hold enough plant available water to sustain plant communities through extended periods of drought (Daniels and Zipper, 1997). Current interest by the West Virginia Division of Highways (DOH) in the use of native plant species for site stabilization has led to a parallel study of the anthropogenic substrates. This study seeks to evaluate existing soil conditions along highway corridors and develop new methods to enhance soil quality on highway cut, fill and on-grade areas. The first objective was to evaluate and compare soil properties on highway cut, fill and on-grade sites located adjacent to Interstate Highways 68, 79 and 81 in West Virginia. The ongoing construction of Corridor H along U.S. Route 33 and State Route 55 presents a unique opportunity to study development of soils affected by highway construction over time. Therefore, the second objective was to evaluate soil development on five fill areas adjacent to Corridor H, and to compare soil properties to age and geology. Methods and Materials Procedures for Selecting Sampling Sites Sampling sites were selected along Interstate Highways 68, 79, and 81, and Corridor H (U.S. Route 33 and State Route 55) in West Virginia. Before field work began, the following criteria were established for selecting highway sampling sites: 1317 Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2004 1. Slope steepness should be no more than 70%. 2. Cut and fill areas must extend at least 20 m perpendicular to the highway from the point at which vegetation begins (described as the site boundary) to allow for 10-m and 20-m sampling points (on-grade areas must extend at least 10 m). 3. Bridges, culverts or any other type of drainage structure should not interrupt transects. 4. There must be ample parking space at the site for safety of the workers. Highways were first subdivided based on gross geologic differences. It was determined that geology for the entire length of Interstate 68 was uniform. Interstate 79 was originally divided into two sections, but fieldwork indicated that soils were similar between the two sections. Therefore, only the northern section was included in this paper. For Interstate 81, two geologic sections were originally identified. The longer section was predominantly limestone whereas a shorter section on the northern end consisted mostly of shale. However, no acceptable sampling sites were identified within the shale section. Therefore, only the limestone section was evaluated. Each highway was visually surveyed, for all cut, fill and on-grade sites apparently meeting the criteria described above. Potential sites were listed according to type and were randomized using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with RAND and RANK functions. Sampling sites were selected by visiting the first site on each randomized list. If the site met the selection criteria, then the site was chosen for sampling. If the site did not meet all of the selection criteria, then the next site on the list was visited. This selection process continued until one fill, one cut and one on-grade site in each section met all the selection criteria.
Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    visionHagerstown 2035 5 | Transportation Transportation Introduction An adequate vehicular circulation system is vital for Hagerstown to remain a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Road projects that add highway capacity and new road links will be necessary to meet the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for growth management, economic development, and the downtown. This chapter addresses the City of Hagerstown’s existing transportation system and establishes priorities for improvements to roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities over the next 20 years. Goals 1. The city’s transportation network, including roads, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, will meet the mobility needs of its residents, businesses, and visitors of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. 2. Transportation projects will support the City’s growth management goals. 3. Long-distance traffic will use major highways to travel around Hagerstown rather than through the city. Issues Addressed by this Element 1. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs to be enhanced to maintain safe and efficient flow of people and goods in and around the city. 2. Hagerstown’s network of major roads is generally complete, with many missing or partially complete segments in the Medium-Range Growth Area. 3. Without upgrades, the existing road network will not be sufficient to accommodate future traffic in and around Hagerstown. 4. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs more alternatives to the automobile, including transit and bicycle facilities and pedestrian opportunities. Existing Transportation Network Known as “Hub City,” Hagerstown has long served as a transportation center, first as a waypoint on the National Road—America’s first Dual Highway (US Route 40) federally funded highway—and later as a railway node.
    [Show full text]
  • TRB Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, And
    Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles SPECIAL REPORT 267 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2002 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chairman: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chairman: Genevieve Giuliano, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board William D. Ankner, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence Thomas F. Barry, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee Michael W. Behrens, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin Jack E. Buffington, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Sarah C. Campbell, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, D.C. Joanne F. Casey, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland James C. Codell III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort John L. Craig, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln Robert A. Frosch, Senior Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Susan Hanson, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Lester A. Hoel, L.A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany College of Maryland Facility Is Directly Ahead
    2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:46 AM Page 21 Board of Trustees Mr. Kim B. Leonard, Chair 301­707­0123 [email protected] Mrs. Jane A. Belt, Vice­Chair 304­726­7261 [email protected] Members Ms. Mirjhana Buck 301­724­2660 [email protected] Ms. Linda W. Buckel, Esq. 301­697­5371 [email protected] Ms. Joyce K. Lapp 301­268­3249 [email protected] Mr. James R. Pyles 240­580­0865 [email protected] Mr. Barry P. Ronan 240­964­7236 [email protected] Secretary­Treasurer Dr. Cynthia S. Bambara, 301­784­5270 [email protected] President Board Staff Ms. Bobbie Cameron Sr. Execuve Associate to the President and Board of Trustees President Phone: 301­784­5270 Fax: 301­784­5050 [email protected] 14 2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:46 AM Page 22 12401 Willowbrook Road, SE Cumberland, Maryland 21502 301­784­5005 www.allegany.edu President Dr. Cynthia S. Bambara 301­784­5270 [email protected] Sr. Execuve Associate to the Ms. Bobbie Cameron 301­784­5270 [email protected] President & the Board of Trustees VP of Finance and Admin/Facilies Ms. Chrisna Kilduff 301­784­5221 ckilduff@allegany.edu Sr. VP of Instruconal and Dr. Kurt Hoffman 301­784­5287 khoff[email protected] Student Affairs VP Advancement and Community Mr.DavidJones 301­784­5350 [email protected] Relaons/Fundraising Addional MACC Contacts: Student and Legal Affairs Dr. Renee Conner 301­784­5206 [email protected] Educaonal Services Dr. Connie Clion 301­784­5429 [email protected] Enrollment Services & Advising Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Motor Carrier Handbook Revised DECEMBER 2014 in Cooperation With
    Maryland Motor Carrier Handbook Revised DECEMBER 2014 In Cooperation with: Maryland Port Administration Maryland Transportation Authority Maryland State Police Motor Vehicle Administration Public Service Commission Comptroller of Maryland Maryland Department of the Maryland Department of Transportation Environment Maryland Virtual Weigh Station Technology Weight: 103530 lbs Speed: 55.6 mph Length: 64.2 ft Class: 10 Flags: Overweight gross, overweight bridge, overweight axle, overweight tandems VIOLATION Spacing: 4.2 4.2 34.6 4.5 16.7 Axles: Wt.: 16.1 18.9 17.4 20.5 21.3 9.5 Disclaimer: Information contained in the Handbook regarding the various laws and regulations governing commercial motor vehicle operations in Maryland are subject to change without notice. The Handbook is produced solely as a convenience to the public and the State assumes no warranty or representation, either expressed or implied, regarding the information given or the use of any of the material provided or for unintentional omissions, errors, or misprints which appear in the Handbook. On The Cover: Maryland’s Virtual Weigh Station Program is designed to monitor select roadways to assure that vehicles comply with size and weight laws. Enforcement personnel are able to use wireless technology to access the sites remotely and can identify and stop violators. i Maryland Motor Carrier Handbook Survey 1. What do you like about the Handbook? __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany County Is Situated in the Heart of Western Maryland Equidistant from Baltimore, Washington, D.C
    ALLEGANY COUNTY, MAR Y L A N D , U S A FROSTBURG BUSINESS P ARK Allegany County is situated in the heart of Western Maryland equidistant from Baltimore, Washington, D.C. and Pittsburgh. It is crossed by Interstate 68 and the main lines of CSX Transportation, providing excellent access to major markets in the East and Midwest. Likewise, Allegany County is within a one-hour drive of major routes to the North and South via I-79 to the West and I-81 to the East. Frostburg Business Park has a diverse mix of business/manufacturing occupants. Hamilton Relay provides traditional relay services for the State of Maryland including TTY, Voice Carry Over (VCO), Hearing Carry Over (HCO), Speech-to-Speech (STS), Spanish-to-Spanish and CapTel®. Two hotels are close by, Days Inn was built in the 1990s and Hampton Inn was added in 2003. Sierra Hygiene, the most recent tenant, focuses on the away-from-home paper market in North America such as hand towels, bathroom tissue and industrial wipes. FROSTBURG BUSINESS PARK REGION DEMOGRAPHICS MAJOR EMPLOYERS Within a 25 mile radius from Frostburg Business Park: Employer Type Employees Population: 151,190 C & S Landscaping Landscaping 8 Average Household Income: $31,686 Days Inn Hotel 19 Households: 58,322 First United Bank Bank 7 Civilian Labor Force: 67,324 Hamilton Relay Hearing Impaired Relay Service 211 Hampton Inn Motel 20 Source: US Census 2000 Rish Equipment Construction Equipment 9 Sierra Hygiene Paper Resheeting 7 Western MD Signs Signs 4 PARK INFORMATION Location: Frostburg, Maryland Ownership: Cumberland/Allegany
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany P14-16.Pdf
    Board of Trustees Mr. Kim B. Leonard, Chair 301-707-0123 [email protected] Mrs. Jane A. Belt, Vice-Chair 304-726-7261 [email protected] Members Ms. Mirjhana Buck 301-724-2660 [email protected] Ms. Linda W. Buckel, Esq. 301-697-5371 [email protected] Ms. Joyce K. Lapp 301-268-3249 [email protected] Mr. James R. Pyles 240-580-0865 [email protected] Mr. Barry P. Ronan 240-964-7236 [email protected] Secretary-Treasurer Dr. Cynthia S. Bambara, 301-784-5270 [email protected] President Board Staff Ms. Bobbie Cameron Sr. Executive Associate to the President and Board of Trustees President Phone: 301-784-5270 Fax: 301-784-5050 [email protected] 14 12401 Willowbrook Road, SE Cumberland, Maryland 21502 301-784-5005 www.allegany.edu President Dr. Cynthia S. Bambara 301-784-5270 [email protected] Sr. Executive Associate to the Ms. Bobbie Cameron 301-784-5270 [email protected] President & the Board of Trustees VP of Finance and Admin/Facilities Ms. Christina Kilduff 301-784-5221 ckilduff@allegany.edu Sr. VP of Instructional and Dr. Kurt Hoffman 301-784-5287 khoff[email protected] Student Affairs VP Advancement and Community Mr. David Jones 301-784-5350 [email protected] Relations/Fundraising Additional MACC Contacts: Student and Legal Affairs Dr. Renee Conner 301-784-5206 [email protected] Educational Services Dr. Connie Clifton 301-784-5429 [email protected] Enrollment Services & Advising Ms. Jennifer Engelbach 301-784-5656 [email protected] Continuing Education Mr. Jeff Kirk 301-784-5277 [email protected] Institutional Assessment, Research Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overall Pian for the Development and Preservation of the City of Mooha, Pennsylvania
    An Overall Pian for the Development and Preservation of the City of Mooha, Pennsylvania Prepzred Under the Direction of the City of Altoona Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee and Staff of the City of Altoona Depaitmsnt of Planning and Development Adopted by Resolution or' Altoona City CounciI on August 9, 2gOo. Cornm u n it4 Plann i r ia Cons u I t a nt [Jrban Research and Devetoprneilt Corporation Bothle hem, Penns y lva tiia CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................... 1 Great Things Are Happening ................................................... 1 AltoonaWithintheRegion .................................................... 2 I Altoona’sRichHeritage ....................................................... 3 I How This Plan Was Developed ................................................. 4 1 c Initial Public Input ................................................................ 5 Community-Wide Survey ..................................................... 5 Neighborhood Workshops ..................................................... 6 I Results of Focus Group Interviews .............................................. 9 Mission Statement .......................................................... 11 Direction: The Major Goals of this Plan ......................................... 11 I Relationships Between the Components of this Plan ............................... 13 I Land Use and Housing Plan ....................................................... 15 L Economic Development and Downtown Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory GIS for Growth Management in the Cheat Lake Planning District of Monongalia County, West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 Participatory GIS for growth management in the Cheat Lake planning district of Monongalia County, West Virginia Timothy L. Hawthorne West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hawthorne, Timothy L., "Participatory GIS for growth management in the Cheat Lake planning district of Monongalia County, West Virginia" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 702. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/702 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Participatory GIS for Growth Management in the Cheat Lake Planning District of Monongalia County, West Virginia Timothy L. Hawthorne Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Daniel Weiner, Ph.D., Chair Gregory Elmes, Ph.D. Brent McCusker, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2005 Keywords: Participatory GIS, Land Use Planning, Local Knowledge, West Virginia Copyright 2005 Timothy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Information About the Sideling Hill Road Cut & Exhibit Center
    FactSheet 17: Construction Information about the Sideling Hill Road Cut & Exhibit Center Compiled from various sources by staffs of the Maryland Geological Survey and the Sideling Hill Exhibit Center. The I-68 roadcut through the crest of Sideling Hill in western Washington County, Maryland, created one of the best geologic exposures in the northeastern United States. Revealing a cross section through a synclinal ridge, this massive cut has proven to be a significant educational and research tool and tourist attraction. Aside from the geology, however, many visitors ask questions about the construction of this road cut and the Sideling Hill Exhibit Center, which has now moved to Hancock, MD. This fact sheet attempts to answer many of those questions. When was this part of the Interstate 68 and the road cut constructed? Excavation began in April 1983, blasting was completed 16 months later in August 1984; the completed highway was opened in August 1985. How deep is the Sideling Hill road cut? The cut is 340 feet deep from the ridge crest to road level. Surface elevation at the ridge crest is about 1,620 feet and at road level about 1,280 feet. Oblique aerial view west toward the roadcut shows Obique view closer to Sideling Hill than the photo at the ridge form of Sideling Hill before construction of left. In this photo, the Exhibit Center and pedestrian the exhibit center and rest area. (Photo by Paul bridge are clearly visible. (Federal Highway Breeding for the Maryland Geological Survey, 1986) Administration, Maryland Division) Oblique view of the north side (south-facing) side of the roadcut, showing the syncline that underlies Sideling Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Fog Detection for Interstate and State Highways
    Fog Detection for Interstate and State Highways Prepared by West Virginia University The Pennsylvania State University University of Maryland University of Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University West Virginia University 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. WVU-2010-01 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Fog Detection for Interstate and State Highways December 2012 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mehrdad Shahabi, Aung Hlaing, David R. Martinelli, Avinash Unnikrishnan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 11. Contract or Grant No. DTRT07-G-0003 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered US Department of Transportation Final 8/1/11 – 1/31/13 Research & Innovative Technology Admin UTC Program, RDT-30 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Fog is a common and recurrent phenomenon in West Virginia which is the cause of nearly 1.3% of all fatal crashes occurring all over the state. All three types of fog are common in the state which results in lack visibility, limited contrast, distorted perception, judgment errors, and reduction in headway and speed of the vehicle traveling in foggy conditions. State of West Virginia is suffering from lack of suitable fog detection and warning system along many of its arterials where fog is a major issue. The purpose of this project is to first determine favorable fog condition in terms of different meteorological components and introducing various forecasting tools which are utilized by different agencies in fog forecasting process.
    [Show full text]
  • US 219: I-68 (MD) to Meyersdale (PA) Planning and Environment Linkages Study Garrett County, MD and Somerset County, PA
    I-68 TO MEYERSDALE, PA July 2016 US 219 US 219: I-68 (MD) to Meyersdale (PA) Planning and Environment Linkages Study Garrett County, MD and Somerset County, PA Meadow Run and fringe Intersection of US 219 and Mine portals can provide Farms are typical to the wetland Route 40 Alternate habitat for rare bat species Study Area Aerial of the Study Area Executive Summary The Maryland Department of Transportation’s State Highway Administration (MDOT/SHA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) through coordination with the Federal Highway Administration division offices in both states collaborated to complete a Planning and Environment Linkages (PEL) study for improving US 219 between I-68 (Maryland) and the Meyersdale Bypass (Pennsylvania). The US 219 PEL study focused on identifying a range of solutions to advance the PEL’s Vision of completing Corridor N of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS). Additionally, The PEL will review the corridor to determine if any smaller standalone projects with independent utility and logical termini exist. The PEL Vision is to assist ARC in working toward the completion of Corridor N of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) through improvements to the section of US 219 between Meyersdale, Pennsylvania and I-68 in Maryland. The vision includes the desire to generate economic development in previously isolated areas1, supplement the interstate system through connecting I-68 and the Pennsylvania Turnpike (I-76), connect the study area portion of Appalachia to the interstate system, provide access to areas within the region as well as to markets in the rest of the nation2, and improve (the level of) safety for motorists traveling on US 219.
    [Show full text]