Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program “For the sake of peace and justice, let us move toward a world in which all people are at last free to determine their own destiny.” —Ronald Reagan “Like so many other things, democracy has to be nurtured. It has to be cultivated and people have to be given the opportunity to see that it is in their best interests. And so we have come to the conclusion after a long struggle that there must be ways other than with the use of military power, economic tools, and other diplomatic resources, to encourage people to help themselves to the fruits of freedom. This is what the National Endowment for Democracy is all about.” —Dante Fascell 1025 F Street, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20004 202.378.9700 | www.NED.org | [email protected] www.ned.org/fellowships/reagan-fascell-democracy-fellows-program 10years 2 | Leading Testimonials 4 | Programmatic Highlights 37 | Behind the Scenes Democrats at Risk | 20 Fellowship Experience | 6 The Reagan-Fascell Democ- Learning, networking, and international solidarity racy Fellows Program is an international exchange visitor program based at the National Fall 2003 Endowment for Democracy Shahin Abbasov (Azerbaijan) Zainab Bangura (Sierra Leone) (NED), a private, nonprofit Anahit Bayandur (Armenia) Anne Mugisha (Uganda) foundation dedicated to the Albino Okeny (Sudan) growth and strengthening of Tomás Pojar (Czech Republic) Aqil Shah (Pakistan) democratic institutions around Vladimir Tismaneanu (U.S.) 2003 2004 Francisco Villagrán (Guatemala) the world. Each year, NED makes more than 1,000 grants Fall 2004 Ilyas Akhmadov (Russia) to support the projects of non- Dragan Djuric (Montenegro) Abiodun Kolawole (Nigeria) governmental groups abroad Chingiz Mammadov (Azerbaijan) who are working for demo- James Ng’ombe (Malawi) Akintola Olaniyan (Nigeria) cratic goals in more than 90 Yulia Savchenko (Kyrgyzstan) Vitali Silitski (Belarus) countries. 2004 2005 Alumni Roll Call | 34 ON THE COVER, clockwise Alumni Leading the Way | 14 from left: Artist’s rendering of Building new organizations, publishing books, pushing for change Anne-Stella Fomumbod (Cam- eroon, Spring 2011); Ronald Reagan and Dante Fascell; Spring 2009 Fellows’ visit to U.S. Capitol; Fall 2010 Fellows Arturo Alvarado, Roukaya Kasenally, and Levan Berdzen- ishvili; the NED Library. Regional Impact | 22 From the Archives | 36 Strengthening democratic institutions and values worldwide 10 NED International Forum for Democratic Studies y ears 1 s a longtime advocate for international democracy assistance with Tributes“A faith in the power of international exchange, I am impressed with the substantial contribution of the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program over the past ten years. This Congressionally-funded program represents a tangible way in which the American people show their support for human rights and democracy—person by person—across the spectrum of democratic development, from fledgling democracies Leading Testimonials to some of the world’s most repressive political environments. —Richard Gephardt, Chairman, Board of Directors, National Endowment for Democracy s chairman of the he Reagan-Fascell “A Board of the National “TDemocracy Fel- Endowment for Democracy lows Program is a tribute in 2001, it was my privilege to the leadership of two great Americans whose to witness the start-up of the combined vision led to the Reagan-Fascell Democracy creation of the National Fellows Program. Endowment for Democra- What began with four cy: former President Ron- fellows arriving just a few weeks after ald Reagan, whose famous Westminster Address in September 11, 2001, has now developed 1982 launched the field of democracy assistance into a strong alumni network of more internationally; and the late Democratic Con- than 180 democracy activists, journalists, gressman Dante Fascell, whose steadfast commit- and scholars from over 80 countries ment to the cause of democracy was exemplified by his leading role in the founding of the Endow- around the globe. ment. The Fellows Program contributes greatly to all I consider the program to be at the heart of aspects of the Endowment’s work, enhancing what NED does best: supporting courageous both its networking and grantmaking individuals building democracy on their own capability.” terms in their home countries.” —Vin Weber, past Chairman, Board of Directors, NED —Carl Gershman, President, NED 2 Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program | 10th Anniversary have known t has been a am proud to I the Reagan- Igreat joy for I have helped to Fascell Democ- me to oversee launch the Rea- racy Fellows the establish- gan-Fascell De- Program from mocracy Fellows ment of the its inception Program with my in 2001, when Reagan-Fas- NED colleagues. I was asked cell Democ- We felt from the to chair the racy Fellows beginning, and Board’s new Program and to watch it grow we still feel, that having the Fellows, Fellowship Committee, which I with their variety of experiences, did very gladly. over the past ten years. I have come to know an extraordinary intellects, and approaches to demo- I must say this is one group of men and women, both cratic development, in residence at the NED—interacting with the su- scholars and activists, from every of the most successful perb Grantmaking Program staff, the corner of the world. Almost all of programs at the NED. International Forum for Democratic them have been engaged on the Studies, and the Journal of Democra- It brings together both front lines of democratic activism cy—is a wonderfully enriching expe- scholars and activists or scholarship, and my colleagues rience for the entire NED family. The and has helped to create and I have learned an enormous NED is a unique institution in Wash- ington, not only for its longstand- a worldwide network of amount from them. But we have also gained something more—di- ing work as a grassroots democracy individuals who are in rect and personal links with the assistance organization, but also for engaging the world of ideas and re- struggles to achieve and main- the business of building search. The work of the International democratic institutions. tain democracy taking place in so Forum toward uniting theory and many countries across the globe. practice has been advanced signifi- The Reagan-Fascell program Reagan-Fascell alumni testify to cantly by the Reagan-Fascell Fellows enables these individuals to learn the benefits that they derive from over the past ten years. from one another, as their shared experiences are often more their residence at NED, but I often —Larry Diamond relevant than those of people think that the Washington com- Senior Advisor, International Forum for Democratic Studies living in secure democracies. munity gains even more than the One of the great things about fellows do. the program is that after people —Marc F. Plattner come to Washington, they stay Vice-President for Research in touch, and they continue and Studies, NED to share experiences down the road. I congratulate everyone who has been associated with the program and look forward to continuing my involvement in the years ahead. —Francis Fukuyama Member, NED Board of —Carl Gershman, President, NED Directors L-r: Ibrahim Lipumba (Tanzania), Birtukan Midekssa (Ethiopia), Francis Fukuyama, Marc F. Plattner, Timur Kurbanov (Russia), Aziz Royesh (Afghanistan), and Normando Hernández (Cuba). 10 NED International Forum for Democratic Studies 3 A Decade of Democracy Exchange unded by the U.S. Congress and named in honor of NED’s principal founders, former president Ronald Reagan and the late congressman Dante Fascell, the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program was established in 2001 to enable democracy practitioners Fand scholars from around the world to deepen their understanding of democracy and enhance their ability to promote democratic change. This international exchange program hosts democracy activists, human rights advocates, journalists, and others who work on the frontlines of building democracy, bringing fresh insights and perspectives to the Endowment and to Washington, D.C. The Reagan-Fascell program makes The Reagan-Fascell programdemocracies contribute to the its home at the International provides activists and practitioners collegial mix. In recent years, the Programmatic Highlights Programmatic Forum for Democratic Studies, with a needed break from their program has developed specialized the research and publications arm daily routine so that they may resources in support of “emergency” of the National Endowment for reflect on their work, share ideas candidates and democrats at risk, Democracy. Established in 1994, the with counterparts, and reevaluate including human rights defenders Forum has become the preeminent techniques for building democracy in in need of temporary safe haven and center for analysis of the theory and their country of origin. The program exiled advocates seeking to continue practice of democratic developments also welcomes journalists and their democracy work while worldwide, publishing the Journal scholars from emerging and aspiring rebuilding their lives in the United of Democracy and providing a rich democracies, and a small number States. intellectual setting for international of accomplished scholars from the educational exchange. United States and other established The program offers two five-month sessions per year: Fall (October 1– The Reagan-Fascell program facilitates the free exchange of ideas. February 28) and Spring (March L-r: Albino Okeny, Marc F. Plattner, Larry Diamond, Carl Gershman & Zainab Bangura
Recommended publications
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Vol 3, No 1
    PRISM❖ Vol. 3, no. 1 12/2011 PRISM Vol. 3, no. 1 3, no. Vol. ❖ 12/2011 www.ndu.edu A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM ABOUT CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS (CCO) CCO WAS ESTABLISHED TO: PRISM is published by the National Defense University Press for the Center for ❖❖ Serve as an information clearinghouse and knowledge Enhancing the U.S. Government’s Ability to manager for complex operations training and education, PUBLISHER Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex and Prepare for Complex Operations acting as a central repository for information on areas Dr. Hans Binnendijk integrated national security operations; reconstruction and nation-building; such as training and curricula, training and education pro- CCO, a center within the Institute for National Strategic relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and vider institutions, complex operations events, and subject EDITOR AND RESEARCH DIRECTOR Studies at National Defense University, links U.S. education to transform America’s security and development apparatus to meet matter experts Government education and training institutions, including Michael Miklaucic tomorrow’s challenges better while promoting freedom today. related centers of excellence, lessons learned programs, ❖❖ Develop a complex operations training and education com- and academia, to foster unity of effort in reconstruction munity of practice to catalyze innovation and development DEVELOPMENTAL EDITOR and stability operations, counterinsurgency, and irregular of new knowledge, connect members for networking, share Melanne A. Civic, Esq. COMMUNICATIONS warfare—collectively called “complex operations.” existing knowledge, and cultivate foundations of trust and The Department of Defense, with support from the habits of collaboration across the community Constructive comments and contributions are important to us.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008–2009 Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows
    Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Newsletter 2008–2009 Inside This Issue 2009–2010 Reagan-Fascell Fellows...3 2008–2009 Reagan-Fascell Fellows....4 AFRICA: Birame Diop..............................4 Niemat Kuku............................5 Frederic Loua............................6 Gilbert Maoundonodji ...........7 Anyakwee Nsirimovu..............8 ASIA: Jami Chandio.............................9 Suvash Darnal.........................10 Reagan-Fascell Staff (clockwise from bottom left): director Sally Blair, program assistant Jessica Martin, senior Forum Rajesh Dev...............................11 administrator Maria Angelica Fleetwood, research and con- ferences officer Melissa Aten, and manager Zerxes Spencer. Siti Nurjanah...........................12 Ronojoy Sen............................13 EURASIA: Greetings from the National Endowment for Democracy! Ihor Lylo..................................14 On behalf of the International Forum for Democratic Studies, I Ekaterina Osipova.................15 am pleased to share this 2008–2009 Reagan-Fascell Democracy LATIN AMERICA: Fellows Newsletter with you. Now in our ninth year of operation, we Antonio Maldonado...............16 are proud to be associated with 130 alumni from over 60 countries. Enrique Peruzzotti.................17 Established in 2001 by the U.S. Congress in honor of NED’s MIDDLE EAST: two principal founders, former president Ronald Reagan and the late Lila Iril......................................18 congressman Dante Fascell, the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Omar Afifi
    [Show full text]
  • Fellowship Programs
    Fellowship Programs Ilyas Akhmadov (Chechnya) Named in honor of two of NED’s principal founders, former president Ronald Rea- Chechnya’s Struggle gan and the late congressman Dante Fascell, the Reagan-Fascell Democracy for Independence Fellows Program was established in 2001 by the U.S. Congress to enable democratic October 2004–February 2005 activists, policy makers, scholars, and journalists from around the world to deepen Ilyas Akhmadov has long been an out- their understanding of democracy and enhance their ability to promote democratic spoken advocate of peace, moderation, change. Reagan-Fascell fellowships are typically five months in duration and focus on and independence for Chechnya. He the political, social, economic, legal, or cultural aspects of democratic development. was appointed foreign minister in 1999 by Aslan Maskhadov, who was demo- In 2004–2005, the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program hosted leading demo- cratically elected to the presidency of cratic activists, journalists, and scholars from every region of the globe, including Chechnya in 1997. In February 2003, Mr. Australia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Chechnya, China, Ecuador, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Monte- Akhmadov presented a comprehensive negro, Nigeria, South Korea, South Africa, Tajikistan, Turkey, and the United States. peace proposal, titled, The Russian–Chechen Tragedy: Conditional Independence under The Reagan-Fascell program seeks to deepen the knowledge, enrich the skills, broaden an International Administration (coau- the perspectives, and strengthen the
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial Translation CARICC WEEKLY SUMMARY 14.06. to 27.06
    Unofficial translation CARICC WEEKLY SUMMARY (based on mass media reports) 14.06. to 27.06.2021 №21 In the period from 14 to 27 June 2021, based on information from mass media law enforcement bodies and security agencies of CARICC Member States seized 27.2 kg of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including: heroin – 0.500 kg, opium – 8.3 kg cannabis group drugs – 0.843 kg and synthetic drugs - 17.6 kg. CCAARRIICCCC MMEEMMBBEERR SSTTAATTEESS RUSSIAN FEDERATION 17.06.2021 Police officers during investigations in the city of Novocheboksarsk, Chuvash Republic, detained a 40-year-old man who was found and seized 12 kg of mephedrone at his place of residence.https://мвд.рф/news/item/24676647 17.06.2021 Police officers stopped a car driven by a 32-year-old man during search operations in the village of Nizhnedevitsk, Voronezh Region. During the inspection of the car in the cabin, about 1 kg of methylephedrone was found inside the "glove compartment". https://мвд.рф/news/item/24660666 18.06.2021 Police officers detained two men during investigations in the city of Naberezhnye Chelny of the Republic of Tatarstan, who seized 1.1 kg of mephedrone. https://мвд.рф/news/item/24667287 18.06.2021 Police officers detained a 48-year-old local resident, who was engaged in the cultivation of cannabis at his place of residence, during investigations in the city of Gelendzhik, Krasnodar Territory. During the search, 66 hemp bushes and 250 g of marijuana were found. https://мвд.рф/news/item/24695330 19.06.2021 Police officers detained a local resident, who was engaged in the sale of synthetic drugs in a non-contact way - by creating hiding places during investigations in the city of Ivanovo, Ivanovo region.
    [Show full text]
  • Silitski-16-4
    PREEMPTING DEMOCRACY: THE CASE OF BELARUS Vitali Silitski Vitali Silitski is a 2004–2005 Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy. In 2003, he was forced to leave his position as associate professor at the European Humanities University in Minsk after publicly criticizing Belarus’s government. In 2001, ten years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the prospects for democracy in its successor states (outside the Baltic) seemed in- creasingly bleak. Even countries that had begun their independence from the USSR in relatively promising fashion seemed to be sliding back toward autocracy. But then things suddenly seemed to change. A series of dramatic events—Georgia’s 2003 Rose Revolution, Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution, and the Tulip Revolution that ousted Kyrgyz president Askar Akayev following rigged February 2005 parliamentary elections—created a very different set of expectations. Many thought that this new wave of change would spread democratic impulses through- out the region, leading to the ouster of autocrats in other countries. In reaction to the events in Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan, poli- tics is indeed changing in postcommunist Eurasia—but in many places it is changing for the worse. Several of the region’s surviving autocra- cies have tightened the reins: Kazakhstan recently outlawed its major opposition party; Tajikistan introduced new regulations restricting con- tact between foreign diplomats and local civil society groups; Azerbaijan’s opposition groups and independent press face a new round of attacks in advance of the November 2005 parliamentary elections; in Uzbekistan, a May 2005 rebellion against President Islam Karimov was violently suppressed; and Russian president Vladimir Putin recently announced an upcoming ban on civil society assistance from abroad and implemented an electoral reform that makes it impossible for par- ties independent of the presidential administration to win representation in parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Airlift E £100 Rapid Reaction & Tanker Operations
    “THE flagship airlift conference for the community” Wing Commander Andrew Brookes 5th-6th DECEMBER 2011 | THE MARRIOTT HOTEL, AMSTERDAM Ea rly Bird Disc ount: BO OK BY SEPT EMBER AN 30TH D SAV military airlift E £100 rapid reaction & tanker operations KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Major General Major General Major General (S) Attend the largest Jochen Both, (S) Christopher Barbara J. Commander, Bogdan, KC-46 Faulkenberry, bespoke military airlift European Air PEO and Deputy Director, Transport Program Director, J3/J4 Operations conference in Europe Command Aeronautical and Logistics, Systems Center AFRICOM Meet high-level CONFERENCE CHAIRMAN: representation from Wing Commander Andrew Brookes (Rtd), Director, The Air League Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR / ODYSSEY SPEAKER PANEL INCLUDES: DAWN Colonel Birame Diop, Officer in Gunnar Borch, General Manager, Command, Air Transport Section, NATO Airlift Management Senegal Air Force Participants are James Smith, Chief of Movement unrivalled in their Colonel Keith P. Boone, Control Section, United Nations Commander, Heavy Airlift Wing seniority and influence Brigadier General (R) Dimitrios across the international Colonel Christian Schmidt, Director, Petridis, Aviation Project Support Movement Coordination Centre Manager, NAMSA airlift community Europe Laurent Donnet, Project Officer in Colonel Jennifer Thompson, Chief Deployment, European Defence Hear first class presentations AMCC, NATO SHAPE Agency about the following projects, Colonel Bas Pellemans, Paulo Gastão Silva, Vice-President, programs and commands:
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Eastern Partnership
    The EU’s Eastern Partnership Why It May Help Democracy Promotion and How the United States Can Help Move It Forward PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 70 Vitali Silitski Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies September 2009 The European Union’s Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative, generally welcomed on both sides of the Atlantic as a positive step toward drawing the countries of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus into the Western orbit, has also received its share of bad press. According to critics, the EU has failed to give these countries a clear European perspective, instead engaging them in a modified version of Cold War-era Ostpolitik. I argue, however, that the EaP, while modest in scope and scale, is an opportunity over the long term to encourage not only the modernization and democratization of partner states, but also transatlantic democracy promotion efforts and the advancement of U.S. interests in the region. Using the experience of Belarus, I discuss how the EaP could be further fine-tuned to indirectly promote democracy and give U.S. policy in the region a new sense of direction after its “post-orange” democracy promotion agenda has stumbled. Why Eastern Partnership Matters and Why It May Be Good for Democracy The idea for the Eastern Partnership was originally proposed by Poland and Sweden in the spring of 2008, but it was not officially approved until after the August 2008 Russia- Georgia war. The EaP was a symbolically important signal of the EU’s commitment to the future of the region. Its importance arises, first, from the EU’s assertion that its relations with the countries of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus should not be overshadowed by, or be a mere function of, EU-Russian ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Report Helicopter.Pdf
    1 The world’s military helicopter fleets in 2025 currently due to retire in 2025, and possibly for look set to be dominated by the Sikorsky S-70, the Royal Navy’s AW101 MERLIN HM.Mk 2s the Boeing Chonook, the Mil Mi-17 HIP, the and HC MK 4/4As from 2035. Airbus PUMA/Super PUMA family and the Boeing AH-64 Apache, together with the Tilt-rotors might be in more widespread NH90s, Leonardo AW101 MERLINS and service by 2025, with the 316mph V-22 likely AW139/149/169/189s. to gain further customers, and the Leonardo AW609 gaining its first military customer in The AW139 has proven popular with military the shape of the UAE Air Force and Air operators, with more than 100 delivered or on Defence, which ordered three aircraft for SAR order. The Irish Air Corps became the first use by its Joint Aviation Command. military operator of the type, taking delivery of the first of six AW139s in August 2006. The None of the promising compound helicopter type has since been delivered to 19 air forces, and tilt-rotor designs and demonstrator including those of Algeria, Pakistan, Qatar and programmes are likely to lead to frontline the United Arab Emirates. derivatives in any meaningful near-term timescale. The AW149 is an enlarged military derivative with a larger fuselage and more powerful What this means is that most of the world’s engines. Thailand has ordered five AW149 military helicopter fleets in 2025 will look helicopters for the Royal Thai Army, and the much the same as today’s, relying mainly on type has been marketed to South Africa as a the same types, though tactics and doctrine potential replacement for the ageing SAAF will undoubtedly continue to evolve and there ORYX fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • African Air Chiefs Symposium Employing the Network of African Airman to Increase African Aviation Capacity
    AFRICAN AIR CHIEFS SYMPOSIUM EMPLOYING THE NETWORK OF AFRICAN AIRMAN TO INCREASE AFRICAN AVIATION CAPACITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14-17 September 2015 Nouakchott, Mauritania United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) – United States Air Forces Africa (AFAFRICA) and the Etat Major de l’Armée de l’Air des Forces Aérienne de Mauritanie (Headquarters Mauritanian Air Force) co-hosted the fifth annual African Air Chiefs Symposium. Air Force Chiefs of Staff and Deputy Chiefs of Staff from eighteen African countries1 participated in the event, which focused on continuing to build a network of airmen to increase the capabilities of airpower in Africa. The symposium goals included: improving air operations across the continent; identifying key policy, institutional, operational, and capacity challenges confronting African Air Chiefs; exchanging ideas on how to develop African airpower to effectively support the full range of military operations; providing a venue where African air force leaders can network, build trust, and define areas for future operational cooperation; laying the foundation to expand the forum into a decision-making organization; incorporating the African Union (AU) to address continental-wide air requirements; promoting the relevance of airpower in joint and multi-national operations using vignettes and examples of air force successes presented by Air Chiefs; and lastly, developing an action plan that outlines specific items to accomplish in the near-term. Throughout the week, the air chiefs examined the role of airpower in providing security in their countries and regions, the challenges facing this objective, and the steps they must take to reach their goals. They specifically noted the importance of political will and the pervasive lack of familiarity with the role of air forces in providing security.
    [Show full text]
  • Importing Orange? Prospects for Belarusian Democratization
    Importing Orange? Prospects for Belarusian Democratization By Luke Forster Abstract: Eastern Europe’s recent wave of grassroots democratic breakthroughs has removed entrenched authoritarian regimes from Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), and Ukraine (2004). Is there hope that this trend of Color Revolutions will continue and topple Alexander Lukashenko’s oppressive dictatorship in Belarus? Luke Forster examines this question by offering a list of requirements for a Color Revolution and applying it to a case study of Ukraine’s Orange Revolution and the Belarusian presidential elections of 2006. Between Two Worlds The implosion of the Soviet Union in 1991 was widely hailed as an ideological triumph of democracy over authoritarianism. After a forty-five year long standoff, Europe finally seemed safe for democracy. However, old habits die hard, and the mid-1990s saw many Eastern European nations backsliding into autocracy. While a number of these new dictatorships persist, a second wave of pro- democracy movements has ousted authoritarian regimes in Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), and Ukraine (2004). These “Color Revolutions” were large-scale, grassroots movements of oppressed peoples demanding an end to the repression, corruption, and fraud in their governments. But has the advance of democracy halted? Why have some ex- Soviet republics undergone bottom-up democratic breakthroughs while their neighbors still remain bogged down in repression? Although Eastern Europe may sometimes seem half a world away from America, it is nonetheless vital that American policymakers study the region’s recent democratic breakthroughs. As America has always been concerned with promoting democracy, liberty, and the rule of law, it is crucial that we examine how and when democratic breakthroughs emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Limited Response to Belarus' Pseudo 'New Foreign Policy'
    No. 151 y February 2008 Introduction The EU’s Limited Response Relations between the European Union and Belarus have seen little change since President to Belarus’ Pseudo Alexander Lukashenko came to power in 1994. Belarus has languished in a state of self- ‘New Foreign Policy’ imposed political isolation despite the George Dura subsequent waves of enlargement – most notably, the 2004 enlargement which made speculates on how the EU can engage with the Belarus a direct neighbour of the EU – and the people of Belarus more effectively. Finally, the formulation in 2004 of the European Union’s paper puts forward a series of short-term and longer- Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). The EU’s dual-track term measures that the EU might consider, on the approach of imposing sanctions and trade condition that Belarus commits to addressing the restrictions whilst promoting democratisation in most basic requirements in the field of human rights Belarus have so far yielded minimal results. and democratisation. The EU renewed its offer in December 2006 “to the people of Belarus” of closer cooperation, in return 1. EU policy towards Belarus so far for a series of democratisation measures, put Relations between the EU and Belarus swiftly forward in the form of an unofficial document. cooled down after Alexander Lukashenko swept to Today, however, there still exists no framework for power in 1994. Relations further worsened after political dialogue at the highest level between the Lukashenko held a referendum in 1996, thereby EU and Belarus. The energy crisis between Belarus changing the constitution to extend his presidential and Russia in December 2006-January 2007 created mandate until 2001.
    [Show full text]