DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Soil Bacteria As Bioinoculants for the Control of Field Pea Root Rot Caused by Aphanomyces Euteiches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Soil Bacteria As Bioinoculants for the Control of Field Pea Root Rot Caused by Aphanomyces Euteiches Evaluation of soil bacteria as bioinoculants for the control of field pea root rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Ashebir Tsedeke Godebo © Copyright Ashebir Tsedeke Godebo, March 2019. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirement for a post graduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the library of this University may take it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purpose may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work is done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis part or its parts for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due consideration shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Request for permission to copy or to make other use of any material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Soil Science 51 Campus drive University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i DISCLAIMER Reference in this thesis to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the University of Saskatchewan. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not state or reflect those of the University of Saskatchewan and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. ii ABSTRACT Aphanomyces euteiches is an oomycete pathogen that is becoming a serious problem for field pea (Pisum sativum L) production in western Canada. The pathogen causes severe rot in the root, cortex, and epicotyl of field pea resulting in stunting, yellow and wilting leaves, or plant death. Aphanomyces root rot develops because of zoosporic or myceliogenic infection when oospores germinate to form germ sporangia and germ tubes, respectively. Until the recent introduction of the fungicide INTEGOTM Solo (ethaboxam) and Vibrance® Maxx RFC, there was no fungicide available in Canada that effectively suppresses or controls aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Additional control measures are needed, and one addition to chemical control is the development of bacterial inoculants that interrupt the pathogen’s lifecycle and ultimately control or reduces disease expression in the host plant. This study comprised laboratory studies aimed at isolating and identifying antagonistic bacteria against A. euteiches mycelia and zoospore growth stages, and growth chamber trials that examined efficacy of antagonistic bacteria as biocontrol agents against aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Soils were collected from 43 commercial field pea fields across Saskatchewan. Initial screening of antagonistic bacteria was completed by assessing mycelia growth inhibition of A. euteiches in vitro. Growth inhibition of each antagonistic bacterium was further evaluated using a dual plate assay technique where single colonies of the antagonistic bacterial isolates were inoculated at two opposite edges on a PDA plate and a plug of A. euteiches mycelia was placed in the center of the plate. Additionally, a preliminary screening assay utilizing a dual plate technique was employed to assess 170 bacterial isolates for biocontrol activity against A. euteiches. These iii 170 bacterial isolates were from a previously existing bacteria culture collection of roots associated rhizobacteria from a variety of field crops. The antagonistic bacterial isolates were also assayed for in vitro zoospore germination inhibition. A total of 184 antagonistic bacteria, of which 22 were from a previously existing bacteria culture collection, that inhibited the mycelia stage of A. euteiches were identified using the initial screening assay. Of these, 47 inhibited zoospore germination by 75% or more compared to a control assay plate. The mean mycelial growth inhibition potential of the isolates ranged from 1 mm to 12 mm whereas the mean zoospore germination inhibition potential of the isolates ranged from 0 to 100 %. Based on 16S rDNA gene sequencing, the antagonistic bacterial isolates were placed into 18 different genera with Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus, Lysobacter and Streptomyces being the top five containing 45, 32, 29,17 and 12 antagonistic bacterial isolates, respectively. Bacterial isolates that inhibited mycelia growth and zoospore germination by 75% or more were selected for further evaluation in growth chamber trials. In the first set of experiments (Trial 1) pea plants were grown in vermiculite and inoculated with antagonistic bacterial suspensions and A. euteiches zoospores. Four weeks after planting, the pea plants were harvested, and roots assessed for level of disease development. Isolates which significantly suppressed aphanomyces root rot in vermiculite were further evaluated as soil inoculants in pot experiments using non- sterile field soil (Trial 2). Screening of 47 antagonistic bacteria as bioinoculants in growth chamber Trial 1 identified 29 that significantly (α = 0.05) suppressed or reduced aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Of these, 20 isolates were selected and screened as soil inoculants in a second set of experiments (Trial 2) iv and three isolates produced the highest biocontrol activity and significantly (α = 0.05) suppressed or reduced aphanomyces root rot in field pea. From the findings of this research, it can be concluded that the A. euteiches lifecycle can be interrupted using rhizosphere bacteria and hence these bacterial isolates may be used as biocontrol agents to suppress or reduce aphanomyces root rot in field pea. Variations of inhibition potential among isolates suggests that the mechanisms by which biocontrol is achieved such as the production and secretion of inhibitory compounds and/or the mode of action exerted by the inhibitory metabolites likely varies among isolates. The results of this research indicate the potential promise for the development of microbial biocontrol agents. Further studies aimed at assessing the efficacy of the promising isolates under field conditions in Saskatchewan and other manipulative studies that would maximize biocontrol potential and their effective utilization are a necessary next step. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am truly thankful to my supervisors Drs. Fran Walley and Jim Germida for their continuous help and support throughout my program at the University of Saskatchewan. Without their guidance and help, I wouldn’t have been able to excel in my studies and research. I would also like to thank and greatly appreciate the time and help given by other committee members, Drs. Sabine Banniza and Jeff Schoenau. I am grateful to Dr. Bobbi Helgeson and people in Soil Microbiology lab. A very special thanks go to Jorge Cordero, Eduardo Kovalski, Akeem Shorunke, Claire Kohout, Zayda Morales, Bethany Templeton, Panchali Katalunda and the summer students Ian Hnatowich and Kyler Kanegawa. This also extends to Nimllash Sivachandrakumar and Laura Cox from Dr. Sabine’s lab who provided technical help. I would also like to thank Marc St. Arnaud and Kim Heidinger from the Department of Soil Science for the administrative assistance. Finally, I would like to thank the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers for supporting this project financially. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE ................................................................................................................................. i DISCLAIMER .............................................................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ x LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF EQUATIONS ............................................................................................................................. xiv 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVE .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Specific objectives ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tesis Doctoral 2014 Filogenia Y Evolución De Las Poblaciones Ambientales Y Clínicas De Pseudomonas Stutzeri Y Otras Especies
    TESIS DOCTORAL 2014 FILOGENIA Y EVOLUCIÓN DE LAS POBLACIONES AMBIENTALES Y CLÍNICAS DE PSEUDOMONAS STUTZERI Y OTRAS ESPECIES RELACIONADAS Claudia A. Scotta Botta TESIS DOCTORAL 2014 Programa de Doctorado de Microbiología Ambiental y Biotecnología FILOGENIA Y EVOLUCIÓN DE LAS POBLACIONES AMBIENTALES Y CLÍNICAS DE PSEUDOMONAS STUTZERI Y OTRAS ESPECIES RELACIONADAS Claudia A. Scotta Botta Director/a: Jorge Lalucat Jo Director/a: Margarita Gomila Ribas Director/a: Antonio Bennasar Figueras Doctor/a por la Universitat de les Illes Balears Index Index ……………………………………………………………………………..... 5 Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………... 7 Abstract/Resumen/Resum ……………………………………………………….. 9 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………. 15 I.1. The genus Pseudomonas ………………………………………………….. 17 I.2. The species P. stutzeri ………………………………………………......... 23 I.2.1. Definition of the species …………………………………………… 23 I.2.2. Phenotypic properties ………………………………………………. 23 I.2.3. Genomic characterization and phylogeny ………………………….. 24 I.2.4. Polyphasic identification …………………………………………… 25 I.2.5. Natural transformation ……………………………………………... 26 I.2.6. Pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance …………………………….. 26 I.3. Habitats and ecological relevance ………………………………………… 28 I.3.1. Role of mobile genetic elements …………………………………… 28 I.4. Methods for studying Pseudomonas taxonomy …………………………... 29 I.4.1. Biochemical test-based identification ……………………………… 30 I.4.2. Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids ................................ 32 I.4.3. Matrix Assisted Laser-Desorption Ionization Time-Of-Flight
    [Show full text]
  • Published Version
    PUBLISHED VERSION Rays H. Y. Jiang ... Vincent Bulone ... et al. Distinctive expansion of potential virulence genes in the genome of the oomycete fish pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica PLoS Genetics, 2013; 9(6):e1003272-1-e1003272-20 © 2013 Jiang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Originally published at: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003272 PERMISSIONS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://hdl.handle.net/2440/97179 Distinctive Expansion of Potential Virulence Genes in the Genome of the Oomycete Fish Pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica Rays H. Y. Jiang1., Irene de Bruijn2¤a., Brian J. Haas1., Rodrigo Belmonte2,3,LarsLo¨ bach2, James Christie2,3, Guido van den Ackerveken4, Arnaud Bottin5, Vincent Bulone6, Sara M. Dı´az-Moreno6, Bernard Dumas5, Lin Fan1, Elodie Gaulin5, Francine Govers7,8, Laura J. Grenville-Briggs2,6, Neil R. Horner2, Joshua Z. Levin1, Marco Mammella9, Harold J. G. Meijer7, Paul Morris10, Chad Nusbaum1, Stan Oome4, Andrew J. Phillips2, David van Rooyen2, Elzbieta Rzeszutek6, Marcia Saraiva2, Chris J. Secombes3, Michael F. Seidl8,11, Berend Snel8,11, Joost H. M. Stassen4, Sean Sykes1, Sucheta Tripathy12, Herbert van den Berg2, Julio C. Vega-Arreguin13, Stephan Wawra2, Sarah K. Young1, Qiandong Zeng1, Javier Dieguez- Uribeondo14, Carsten Russ1", Brett M. Tyler12¤b", Pieter van West2*" 1 Broad Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Composition and Role of the Prokaryotic Diversity in the Potato Rhizosphere for Crop Improvement in the Andes
    Understanding the composition and role of the prokaryotic diversity in the potato rhizosphere for crop improvement in the Andes Jonas Ghyselinck Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor (Ph.D.) in Sciences, Biotechnology Promotor - Prof. Dr. Paul De Vos Co-promotor - Dr. Kim Heylen Ghyselinck Jonas – Understanding the composition and role of the prokaryotic diversity in the potato rhizosphere for crop improvement in the Andes Copyright ©2013 Ghyselinck Jonas ISBN-number: 978-94-6197-119-7 No part of this thesis protected by its copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system without written permission of the author and promotors. Printed by University Press | www.universitypress.be Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. This Ph.D. work was financially supported by European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 under grant agreement N° 227522 Publicly defended in Ghent, Belgium, May 28th 2013 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE Prof. Dr. Savvas Savvides (chairman) Faculty of Sciences Ghent University, Belgium Prof. Dr. Paul De Vos (promotor) Faculty of Sciences Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Kim Heylen (co-promotor) Faculty of Sciences Ghent University, Belgium Prof. Dr. Anne Willems Faculty of Sciences Ghent University, Belgium Prof. Dr. Peter Dawyndt Faculty of Sciences Ghent University, Belgium Prof. Dr. Stéphane Declerck Faculty of Biological, Agricultural and Environmental Engineering Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Dr. Angela Sessitsch Department of Health and Environment, Bioresources Unit AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Tulln, Austria Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S1 Supplementary Figure 1. Phylogenetic Tree for Reb
    Figure S1 Shewanella denitrificans OS217-reb1 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb8 Polymorphum gilvum SL003B-26A1-reb1 Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri str. 306-reb6 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb6 Azorhizobium caulinodans-reb3 Rhodospirillum centenum-reb1 Azorhizobium caulinodans-reb1 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb3 Rhodospirillum centenum-reb2 Rhodospirillum centenum-reb5 Rhodospirillum centenum-reb4 Burkholderia ambifaria AMMD-reb2 Burkholderia ambifaria AMMD-reb1 Burkholderia ambifaria AMMD-reb3 Rhodospirillum centenum-reb3 Burkholderia lata-383 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb5 Azorhizobium caulinodans-reb2 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb4 Azorhizobium caulinodans-reb4 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb7 Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS3-reb2 Pseudomonas fluorescens NEP1-reb2 Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472-reb5 Plesiocystis pacifica SIR-1-reb2 Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC Polymorphum 12472-reb6 gilvum SL003B-26A1-reb2 Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS3-reb1 Pseudomonas fluorescens A506-reb3 Pseudomonas antarctica BS2772-reb3 Bukholderia Bukholderia sp. CCGE1003-reb1 sp. CCGE1003-reb2 Pseudomonas palleroniana Pseudomonas BS3265-reb3 protegens pf5-reb3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14-PA14_27630 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14-PA14_27640 Pseudomonas synxantha BS33R-reb3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa AR0440-reb1 Pseudomonas libanensis BS2975-reb3 Pseudomonas mucidolens LMG2223-reb3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB58-reb2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa AR0440-reb2 Pseudomonas chlororaphis B25-reb3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB58-reb1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB58-reb3 Chromobacterium
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions in Root Infecting Oomycete Species
    Host-Pathogen Interactions in Root Infecting Oomycete Species Sara Hadji Mollahossein Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2015 Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae 2015:9 Cover: Pea plant infected with Phytophthora pisi (left), control plant (right). Sporangia releasing zoospores (left) and oospores (right) in infected root tissue. (Photo: Sara Hosseini) ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-576-8216-1 ISBN (electronic version) 978-91-576-8217-8 © 2015 Sara Hadji Mollahossein, Uppsala Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2015 Host-Pathogen Interactions in Root Infecting Oomycete Species Abstract The oomycetes include some of the most devastating pathogens on both cultivated crops and wild plants. In the genus Phytophthora some closely related species have a broad host range, while others are very host specific. The aim of this project was to gain an understanding of the mechanisms underlying the differentiation of a subgroup of root-infecting Phytophthora species and to gain knowledge about the plant immune responses triggered by distantly related oomycetes that adapted to the same legume host. We investigated the zoospore chemotaxis of legume-root infecting Phytophthora species to different isoflavonoid compounds and explored a possible connection to host preference. Our results showed that specific chemotaxis towards host isoflavones is of limited importance in Phytophthora sojae and Phytophthora vignae, while, specific chemotaxis of Phytophthora pisi and Phytophthora niederhauserii indicated an adaptation to their pathogenicity on the host and lack of pathogenicity on non-host plants. The comparative proteomic study of P. pisi and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Étude Des Communautés Microbiennes Rhizosphériques De Ligneux Indigènes De Sols Anthropogéniques, Issus D’Effluents Industriels Cyril Zappelini
    Étude des communautés microbiennes rhizosphériques de ligneux indigènes de sols anthropogéniques, issus d’effluents industriels Cyril Zappelini To cite this version: Cyril Zappelini. Étude des communautés microbiennes rhizosphériques de ligneux indigènes de sols anthropogéniques, issus d’effluents industriels. Sciences agricoles. Université Bourgogne Franche- Comté, 2018. Français. NNT : 2018UBFCD057. tel-01902775 HAL Id: tel-01902775 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01902775 Submitted on 23 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE FRANCHE-COMTÉ École doctorale Environnement-Santé Laboratoire Chrono-Environnement (UMR UFC/CNRS 6249) THÈSE Présentée en vue de l’obtention du titre de Docteur de l’Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Spécialité « Sciences de la Vie et de l’Environnement » ÉTUDE DES COMMUNAUTES MICROBIENNES RHIZOSPHERIQUES DE LIGNEUX INDIGENES DE SOLS ANTHROPOGENIQUES, ISSUS D’EFFLUENTS INDUSTRIELS Présentée et soutenue publiquement par Cyril ZAPPELINI Le 3 juillet 2018, devant le jury composé de : Membres du jury : Vera SLAVEYKOVA (Professeure, Univ. de Genève) Rapporteure Bertrand AIGLE (Professeur, Univ. de Lorraine) Rapporteur & président du jury Céline ROOSE-AMSALEG (IGR, Univ. de Rennes) Examinatrice Karine JEZEQUEL (Maître de conférences, Univ. de Haute Alsace) Examinatrice Nicolas CAPELLI (Maître de conférences HDR, UBFC) Encadrant Christophe GUYEUX (Professeur, UBFC) Co-directeur de thèse Michel CHALOT (Professeur, UBFC) Directeur de thèse « En vérité, le chemin importe peu, la volonté d'arriver suffit à tout.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Core Proteomes Among The
    Diversity 2020, 12, 289 1 of 25 Article Comparative Analysis of the Core Proteomes among the Pseudomonas Major Evolutionary Groups Reveals Species‐Specific Adaptations for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas chlororaphis Marios Nikolaidis 1, Dimitris Mossialos 2, Stephen G. Oliver 3 and Grigorios D. Amoutzias 1,* 1 Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece; [email protected] 2 Microbial Biotechnology‐Molecular Bacteriology‐Virology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece; [email protected] 3 Cambridge Systems Biology Centre & Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30‐2410‐565289; Fax: +30‐2410‐565290 Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 22 July 2020; Published: 24 July 2020 Abstract: The Pseudomonas genus includes many species living in diverse environments and hosts. It is important to understand which are the major evolutionary groups and what are the genomic/proteomic components they have in common or are unique. Towards this goal, we analyzed 494 complete Pseudomonas proteomes and identified 297 core‐orthologues. The subsequent phylogenomic analysis revealed two well‐defined species (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas chlororaphis) and four wider phylogenetic groups (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas putida) with a sufficient number of proteomes. As expected, the genus‐level core proteome was highly enriched for proteins involved in metabolism, translation, and transcription. In addition, between 39–70% of the core proteins in each group had a significant presence in each of all the other groups. Group‐specific core proteins were also identified, with P.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Mapping of Resistance to Aphanomyces Root Rot in Alfalfa *E
    Genetic mapping of resistance to Aphanomyces root rot in alfalfa15 Samac, D.A.*, Dornbusch, M. R., Bucciarelli, B., Miller, S. S. and Yu, L.-X. USDA-Agricultural Research Service *e-mail: [email protected] KEYWORDS: Aphanomyces euteiches, genotyping by sequencing, NBS-LRR resistance genes Aphanomyces root rot (ARR), caused by the oomycete Aphanomyces euteiches, is one of the most important yield-limiting factors in production of legumes. In Europe, it is the main limiting factor for pea production while in the United States it is one of the most important diseases of alfalfa and pea (Gaulin et al., 2007). The disease causes stunting and death of alfalfa seedlings with complete stand loss occurring in wet and poorly drained soils. Non-lethal damage to seedling roots reduces forage yields and winter survival. The pathogen can infect adult plants during wet periods to cause loss of feeder roots and root nodules, reducing nitrogen fixation, forage yield, and stand life. Varieties with resistance to ARR became widely available in the 1990s; however, failure of resistant varieties identified a second race of the pathogen. Recent reports of failure of varieties with resistance to both race 1 and race 2 suggest that additional pathogenic races are present in alfalfa production fields. The goals of this research were to: (i) determine the prevalence of race 1 and race 2 strains in Minnesota and New York; (ii) identify novel strains of the pathogen; (iii) characterize the race-specific resistance to Aphanomyces root rot; and (iv) map resistance genes in order to facilitate breeding for resistance and to clarify race/resistance gene relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of New Genome-Informed Genotyping Tools for Aphanomyces Astaci
    Development of new genome-informed genotyping tools for Aphanomyces astaci Submitted by Diana Minardi to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences In May 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely thank my supervisors Dr Mark van der Giezen, Dr David Studholme, and Dr Birgit Oidtmann for their invaluable guidance and support during these 3 years (plus a bit) of PhD, both practically and in the writing of the thesis. I would like to thank Cefas and the University of Exeter for funding the project and for giving me the opportunity to embrace this challenge and adventure. I would like to thank all of the University of Exeter “Biocat” lab and office, with whom I’ve spent most of my coffee time. But especially Mirella (for the laughs and cries) and Simone (for the sweaty runs around campus). I would also like to thank Chiara for her constant support, encouragement, and beer. Finally, I would like to thank Tony, for his patience, and my family, for their “overseas” support: I’ve finally finished “the shrimp” book! 2 Abstract Aphanomyces spp. are water moulds, eukaryotic fungus-like organisms, belonging to the class Oomycota.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7476,532 B2 Schneider Et Al
    USOO7476532B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7476,532 B2 Schneider et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 13, 2009 (54) MANNITOL INDUCED PROMOTER Makrides, S.C., "Strategies for achieving high-level expression of SYSTEMIS IN BACTERAL, HOST CELLS genes in Escherichia coli,” Microbiol. Rev. 60(3):512-538 (Sep. 1996). (75) Inventors: J. Carrie Schneider, San Diego, CA Sánchez-Romero, J., and De Lorenzo, V., "Genetic engineering of nonpathogenic Pseudomonas strains as biocatalysts for industrial (US); Bettina Rosner, San Diego, CA and environmental process.” in Manual of Industrial Microbiology (US) and Biotechnology, Demain, A, and Davies, J., eds. (ASM Press, Washington, D.C., 1999), pp. 460-474. (73) Assignee: Dow Global Technologies Inc., Schneider J.C., et al., “Auxotrophic markers pyrF and proC can Midland, MI (US) replace antibiotic markers on protein production plasmids in high cell-density Pseudomonas fluorescens fermentation.” Biotechnol. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Prog., 21(2):343-8 (Mar.-Apr. 2005). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Schweizer, H.P.. "Vectors to express foreign genes and techniques to U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. monitor gene expression in Pseudomonads. Curr: Opin. Biotechnol., 12(5):439-445 (Oct. 2001). (21) Appl. No.: 11/447,553 Slater, R., and Williams, R. “The expression of foreign DNA in bacteria.” in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Walker, J., and (22) Filed: Jun. 6, 2006 Rapley, R., eds. (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2000), pp. 125-154. (65) Prior Publication Data Stevens, R.C., “Design of high-throughput methods of protein pro duction for structural biology.” Structure, 8(9):R177-R185 (Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Rots in Pulses
    CROP DEVELOPMENT CENTRE Root Rots in Pulses Michelle Hubbard, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current Research Scientist, Pulse Pathology Co-authors: Sabine Banniza, Zakir Hossain, Sherrilyn Phelps, Syama Chatterton, Luke Bainard & Barb Ziesman What is root rot? Caused by micro-organisms Range of pathogens • Fusarium species • Pythium species • Rhizoctonia solani • Aphanomyces euteiches Pea and lentil do not like wet feet High soil moisture can cause • ↓ root and shoot growth • yellowing • ↓ nodulation Stressed plants are more susceptible to infection Normal soil Water- moisture saturated Peas in sterile field soil Root rot is a complex Fusarium species Pythium species Rhizoctonia solani Aphanomyces euteiches And it is complicated! Wider host range True fungi • Fusarium spp. (e.g. solani, • Fusarium spp. avenaceum, acuminatum, graminearum) • Rhizoctonia solani • Rhizoctonia solani • Pythium spp. Fungus-like organisms (oomycetes) Attack only specific plants: • Pythium spp. • Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi, f.sp. ciceris or f. sp. • Aphanomyces lentis, F. virgulifome euteiches • Aphanomyces euteiches • Phytophthora spp. • Phytophthora spp Fusarium Courtesy of S. Chatterton, AAFC Infects many different plants Courtesy of F. Dokken-Bouchard, SMA Aphanomyces Oospores Infects pea and lentil Oospores = resting spores • More vulnerable after they germinate Zoospores: can swim short distances Courtesy of S. Chatterton, AAFC Courtesy of F. Dokken-Bouchard, SMA Aphanomyces Oospores EveryInfects time pea aand plant lentil gets infected,Oospores
    [Show full text]