DOCSLIB.ORG

Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341 13 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sanxanigenens 247 0.726705699 14 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. LM7 238 0.700226544 15 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas koreensis 226 0.664921004 16 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Bradyrhizobiaceae Rhodopseudomonas Rhodopseudomonas palustris 223 0.656094619 17 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. MM-1 220 0.647268234 18 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas hengshuiensis 216 0.63549972 19 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. LK11 206 0.606078437 20 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Bradyrhizobiaceae Bradyrhizobium Bradyrhizobium erythrophlei 197 0.579599282 21 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Microvirga ossetica 153 0.450145635 22 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Microvirga Sphingopyxis macrogoltabida 153 0.450145635 23 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Methylobacterium nodulans 147 0.432492865 24 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Rhizorhabdus Rhizorhabdus dicambivorans 142 0.417782224 25 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus thuringiensis 141 0.414840095 26 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Caulobacterales Caulobacteraceae Phenylobacterium Phenylobacterium zucineum 133 0.391303069 27 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Methylobacterium sp. 4-46 131 0.385418812 28 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Oscillatoria nigro-viridis 127 0.373650299 29 Cyanobacteria - Oscillatoriales Oscillatoriaceae Oscillatoria Sphingopyxis sp. QXT-31 127 0.373650299 30 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Sphingobium yanoikuyae 126 0.37070817 31 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas melonis 122 0.358939657 32 Acidobacteria Acidobacteria subdivision 6 - Vicinamibacteraceae Luteitalea Luteitalea pratensis 118 0.347171144 33 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. KC8 109 0.320691989 34 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Methylobacterium sp. 17SD2-17 104 0.305981347 35 Planctomycetes Planctomycetia Planctomycetales Planctomycetaceae Planctomyces Planctomyces sp. SH-PL62 102 0.30009709 36 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. NIC1 101 0.297154962 37 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Caulobacterales Caulobacteraceae Caulobacter Caulobacter mirabilis 100 0.294212834 38 Planctomycetes Planctomycetia Planctomycetales Isosphaeraceae Paludisphaera Paludisphaera borealis 100 0.294212834 39 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Sphingobium sp. SYK-6 97 0.285386449 40 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Methylobacterium sp. 17Sr1-43 96 0.28244432 41 Planctomycetes Planctomycetia Planctomycetales Isosphaeraceae Singulisphaera Singulisphaera acidiphila 94 0.276560064 42 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Microvirga Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1-3 89 0.261849422 43 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Methylobacterium aquaticum 87 0.255965165 44 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Sphingomonas sp. JJ-A5 87 0.255965165 45 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Carnobacteriaceae Carnobacterium Carnobacterium maltaromaticum 85 0.250080909 46 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sp. APR13 81 0.238312395 47 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Hyphomicrobiaceae Rhodoplanes Rhodoplanes sp. Z2-YC6860 80 0.235370267 48 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Sphingopyxis sp. WS5A3p 78 0.22948601 49 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus raffinolactis 77 0.226543882 50 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Rhizobiaceae Rhizobium Rhizobium leguminosarum 76 0.223601754 51 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Sphingopyxis fribergensis 74 0.217717497 52 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Novosphingobium Novosphingobium resinovorum 73 0.214775369 53 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Sandaracinaceae Sandaracinus Sandaracinus amylolyticus 73 0.214775369 54 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Lactococcus lactis 72 0.21183324 55 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Sphingopyxis sp. FD7 72 0.21183324 56 Deinococcus-Thermus Deinococci Deinococcales Deinococcaceae Deinococcus Candidatus Solibacter usitatus 71 0.208891112 57 Acidobacteria Solibacteres Solibacterales Solibacteraceae Candidatus Solibacter Deinococcus swuensis 71 0.208891112 58 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Hymenobacter sp. PAMC 26628 70 0.205948983 59 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Sphingopyxis terrae 70 0.205948983 60 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Methylobacteriaceae Methylobacterium Methylobacterium sp. 17Sr1-28 67 0.197122598 61 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingopyxis Sphingopyxis sp. EG6 66 0.19418047 62 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Sphingobium sp. RAC03 65 0.191238342 63 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sp. PAMC 26554 64 0.188296213 64 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter swuensis 64 0.188296213 65 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Bradyrhizobiaceae Bradyrhizobium Bradyrhizobium lablabi 63 0.185354085 66 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Hyphomicrobiaceae Devosia Devosia sp. A16 63 0.185354085 67 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Rhizobiaceae Sinorhizobium Anaeromyxobacter sp. Fw109-5 62 0.182411957 68 Proteobacteria Betaproteobacteria Burkholderiales Comamonadaceae Variovorax Sinorhizobium fredii 62 0.182411957 69 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Anaeromyxobacteraceae Anaeromyxobacter Variovorax paradoxus 62 0.182411957 70 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Actinoplanes friuliensis 61 0.179469828 71 Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Micromonosporales Micromonosporaceae Actinoplanes Sphingobium sp. SCG-1 61 0.179469828 72 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Caulobacter sp. K31 60 0.1765277 73 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Caulobacterales Caulobacteraceae Caulobacter Rhodobacter sphaeroides 60 0.1765277 74 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhodobacterales Rhodobacteraceae Rhodobacter Sphingobium cloacae 60 0.1765277 75 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Kofleriaceae Haliangium Haliangium ochraceum 59 0.173585572 76 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Bradyrhizobiaceae Bosea Bosea sp. RAC05 58 0.170643443 77 Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Geodermatophilales Geodermatophilaceae Modestobacter Modestobacter marinus 58 0.170643443 78 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingobium Mesorhizobium ciceri 57 0.167701315 79 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobiales Phyllobacteriaceae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asaia Bogorensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Unusual Acetic Acid Bacterium in the Α-Proteobacteria
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2000) 50, 823–829 Printed in Great Britain Asaia bogorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an unusual acetic acid bacterium in the α-Proteobacteria Yuzo Yamada,1 Kazushige Katsura,1 Hiroko Kawasaki,2 Yantyati Widyastuti,3 Susono Saono,3 Tatsuji Seki,2 Tai Uchimura1 and Kazuo Komagata1 Author for correspondence: Yuzo Yamada. Tel\Fax: j81 54 635 2316. 1 Laboratory of General and Eight Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped and peritrichously flagellated strains Applied Microbiology, were isolated from flowers of the orchid tree (Bauhinia purpurea) and of Department of Applied Biology and Chemistry, plumbago (Plumbago auriculata), and from fermented glutinous rice, all Faculty of Applied collected in Indonesia. The enrichment culture approach for acetic acid bacteria Bioscience, Tokyo was employed, involving use of sorbitol medium at pH 35. All isolates grew University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka 1-1-1, well at pH 30 and 30 SC. They did not oxidize ethanol to acetic acid except for Setagaya-ku, one strain that oxidized ethanol weakly, and 035% acetic acid inhibited their Tokoyo 156-8502, Japan growth completely. However, they oxidized acetate and lactate to carbon 2 The International Center dioxide and water. The isolates grew well on mannitol agar and on glutamate for Biotechnology, Osaka agar, and assimilated ammonium sulfate for growth on vitamin-free glucose University, Yamadaoka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, medium. The isolates produced acid from D-glucose, D-fructose, L-sorbose, Japan dulcitol and glycerol. The quinone system was Q-10. DNA base composition 3 Research and ranged from 593to610 mol% GMC.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Pinpointing the Origin of Mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei
    Pinpointing the origin of mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei, China B.S., Wuhan University, 2009 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology University of Virginia August, 2014 ii Abstract The explosive growth of genomic data presents both opportunities and challenges for the study of evolutionary biology, ecology and diversity. Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis (known as phylogenomics) has demonstrated its power in resolving the evolutionary tree of life and deciphering various fascinating questions regarding the origin and evolution of earth’s contemporary organisms. One of the most fundamental events in the earth’s history of life regards the origin of mitochondria. Overwhelming evidence supports the endosymbiotic theory that mitochondria originated once from a free-living α-proteobacterium that was engulfed by its host probably 2 billion years ago. However, its exact position in the tree of life remains highly debated. In particular, systematic errors including sparse taxonomic sampling, high evolutionary rate and sequence composition bias have long plagued the mitochondrial phylogenetics. This dissertation employs an integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria. By strategically sequencing 18 phylogenetically novel α-proteobacterial genomes, using a set of “well-behaved” phylogenetic markers with lower evolutionary rates and less composition bias, and applying more realistic phylogenetic models that better account for the systematic errors, the presented phylogenomic study for the first time placed the mitochondria unequivocally within the Rickettsiales order of α- proteobacteria, as a sister clade to the Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae families, all subtended by the Holosporaceae family.
    [Show full text]
  • Adhesion of <I>Asaia</I> <I>Bogorensis</I> To
    1186 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 78, No. 6, 2015, Pages 1186–1190 doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-440 Copyright G, International Association for Food Protection Research Note Adhesion of Asaia bogorensis to Glass and Polystyrene in the Presence of Cranberry Juice HUBERT ANTOLAK,* DOROTA KREGIEL, AND AGATA CZYZOWSKA Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland MS 14-440: Received 10 September 2014/Accepted 29 January 2015 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/78/6/1186/1686447/0362-028x_jfp-14-440.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to evaluate the adhesion abilities of the acetic acid bacterium Asaia bogorensis to glass and polystyrene in the presence of American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) juice. The strain of A. bogorensis used was isolated from spoiled commercial fruit-flavored drinking water. The cranberry juice was analyzed for polyphenols, organic acids, and carbohydrates using high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry techniques. The adhesive abilities of bacterial cells in culture medium supplemented with cranberry juice were determined using luminometry and microscopy. The viability of adhered and planktonic bacterial cells was determined by the plate count method, and the relative adhesion coefficient was calculated. This strain of A. bogorensis was characterized by strong adhesion properties that were dependent upon the type of surface. The highest level of cell adhesion was found on the polystyrene. However, in the presence of 10% cranberry juice, attachment of bacterial cells was three times lower. Chemical analysis of juice revealed the presence of sugars, organic acids, and anthocyanins, which were identified as galactosides, glucosides, and arabinosides of cyanidin and peonidin.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Small Rnas Expressed by Bartonella Bacilliformis Under Multiple Conditions 2 Reveal Potential Mechanisms for Persistence in the Sand Fly Vector and Human 3 Host
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.235903; this version posted August 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Novel small RNAs expressed by Bartonella bacilliformis under multiple conditions 2 reveal potential mechanisms for persistence in the sand fly vector and human 3 host 4 5 6 Shaun Wachter1, Linda D. Hicks1, Rahul Raghavan2 and Michael F. Minnick1* 7 8 9 10 1 Program in Cellular, Molecular & Microbial Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, 11 University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America 12 2 Department of Biology and Center for Life in Extreme Environments, Portland State 13 University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America 14 15 16 17 * Corresponding author 18 E-mail: [email protected] (MFM) 19 20 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.235903; this version posted August 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 21 Abstract 22 Bartonella bacilliformis, the etiological agent of Carrión’s disease, is a Gram-negative, 23 facultative intracellular alphaproteobacterium. Carrión’s disease is an emerging but neglected 24 tropical illness endemic to Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador. B. bacilliformis is spread between 25 humans through the bite of female phlebotomine sand flies.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Interaction Between Fish Pathogens and Host Aquatic Animals
    K. Tsukamoto, T. Kawamura, T. Takeuchi, T. D. Beard, Jr. and M. J. Kaiser, eds. Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 5th World Fisheries Congress 2008, pp. 277–288. © by TERRAPUB 2008. Molecular Interaction between Fish Pathogens and Host Aquatic Animals Laura L. Brown* and Stewart C. Johnson National Research Council of Canada Institute for Marine Biosciences 1411 Oxford Street Halifax, NS, B3H 3Z1, Canada Present address: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pacific Biological Station 3190 Hammond Bay Road Nanaimo, NS, V9T 6N7, Canada *E-mail: [email protected] We have studied the host-pathogen interactions between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Aeromonas salmonicida. Sequencing the genome of the bacterium allowed us to investigate virulence factors and other gene products with potential as vaccines. Using knock-out mutants of A. salmonicida, we identified key virulence factors. Proteomics studies of bacterial cells grown in a variety of media as well as in an in vivo implant system revealed differential protein production and have shed new light on bacterial proteins such as superoxide dismutase, pili and flagellar proteins, type three secretion systems, and their roles in A. salmonicida pathogenicity. We constructed a whole ge- nome DNA microarray to use in comparative genomic hybridizations (M-CGH) and bacterial gene expression studies. Carbohydrate analysis has shown the variation in LPS between strains and reveals the importance of LPS in viru- lence. Salmon were challenged with A. salmonicida and tissues were taken to construct suppressive subtractive hybridization libraries to investigate differ- ential host gene expression. We constructed an Atlantic salmon cDNA microarray to investigate the host response to A.
    [Show full text]
  • 09 Piqueras.Qxp
    PERSPECTIVES INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY (2007) 10:217-226 DOI: 10.2436/20.1501.01.30 ISSN: 1139-6709 www.im.microbios.org Microbiology: a dangerous profession? Mercè Piqueras President, Catalan Association for Science Communication (ACCC), Barcelona, Spain The history of science contains many cases of researchers eases in Minorca from the year 1744 to 1749 to which is pre- who have died because of their professional activity. In the fixed, a short account of the climate, productions, inhabi- field of microbiology, some have died or have come close to tants, and endemical distempers of that island (T. Cadell, D. death from infection by agents that were the subject of their Wilson and G. Nicol, London, 1751), which he dedicated to research (Table 1). Infections that had a lethal outcome were the Society of Surgeons of His Majesty’s Royal Navy. usually accidental. Sometimes, however, researchers inocu- Minorcan historian of science Josep M. Vidal Hernández has lated themselves with the pathogen or did not take preventive described and carefully analyzed Cleghorn’s work in measures against the potential pathogen because they wanted Minorca and his report [43]. According to Vidal, what to prove their hypotheses—or disprove someone else’s— Cleghorn describes is “tertian” fever, which was the name regarding the origin of the infection. Here is an overview of given at the time to fever caused by malaria parasites with a several episodes in the history of microbiology since the mid periodicity of 48 hours. In fact, Cleghorn used quinine to nineteenth century involving researchers or workers in fields treat tertian fever (i.e, malaria), which was not eradicated related to microbiology who have become infected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Are Tick-Borne Diseases Caused by Obligate Anaplasmosis: Intracellular Bacteria in the Genera Ehrlichia and Anaplasma
    Ehrlichiosis and Importance Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are tick-borne diseases caused by obligate Anaplasmosis: intracellular bacteria in the genera Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. These organisms are widespread in nature; the reservoir hosts include numerous wild animals, as well as Zoonotic Species some domesticated species. For many years, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species have been known to cause illness in pets and livestock. The consequences of exposure vary Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis, from asymptomatic infections to severe, potentially fatal illness. Some organisms Canine Hemorrhagic Fever, have also been recognized as human pathogens since the 1980s and 1990s. Tropical Canine Pancytopenia, Etiology Tracker Dog Disease, Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are caused by members of the genera Ehrlichia Canine Tick Typhus, and Anaplasma, respectively. Both genera contain small, pleomorphic, Gram negative, Nairobi Bleeding Disorder, obligate intracellular organisms, and belong to the family Anaplasmataceae, order Canine Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, Rickettsiales. They are classified as α-proteobacteria. A number of Ehrlichia and Canine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, Anaplasma species affect animals. A limited number of these organisms have also Equine Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, been identified in people. Equine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, Recent changes in taxonomy can make the nomenclature of the Anaplasmataceae Tick-borne Fever, and their diseases somewhat confusing. At one time, ehrlichiosis was a group of Pasture Fever, diseases caused by organisms that mostly replicated in membrane-bound cytoplasmic Human Monocytic Ehrlichiosis, vacuoles of leukocytes, and belonged to the genus Ehrlichia, tribe Ehrlichieae and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, family Rickettsiaceae. The names of the diseases were often based on the host Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, species, together with type of leukocyte most often infected.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Pollution of the Oceans Toxic Chemical Pollutants in the Oceans Have Been Shown Capable of Causing a Wide Range of Human Diseases
    Supplementary Appendix to “Human Health and Ocean Pollution”, Annals of Global Health, 2020 This Supplementary Appendix contains additional references and documentation supporting the information presented in the report, Human Health and Ocean Pollution. Chemical Pollution of the Oceans Toxic chemical pollutants in the oceans have been shown capable of causing a wide range of human diseases. Toxicological and epidemiological studies document that pollutants such as toxic metals, POPs, dioxins, plastics chemicals, and pesticides can cause cardiovascular effects, developmental and neurobehavioral disorders, metabolic disease, endocrine disruption and cancer. Table 1 in this Supplementary Appendix summarizes the known links between chemical pollutants in the oceans and a range of human health outcomes. The strengths of the associations listed in Table 1 vary depending on the nature of the studies establishing these associations. Some associations have been assessed in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal and human data.1 2 Some are single cross-sectional or case-control studies. There are now a growing number of relevant epidemiological studies, including powerful prospective cohort studies, such as the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS)3 Findings from these investigations are strengthening the evidence base for associations between exposures to organic chemical pollutants and adverse health outcomes. Supplementary Appendix Table 1. Adverse Human Health Outcomes
    [Show full text]
  • (Phaseolus Vulgaris) in Native and Agricultural Soils from Colombia Juan E
    Pérez-Jaramillo et al. Microbiome (2019) 7:114 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0727-1 RESEARCH Open Access Deciphering rhizosphere microbiome assembly of wild and modern common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in native and agricultural soils from Colombia Juan E. Pérez-Jaramillo1,2,3, Mattias de Hollander1, Camilo A. Ramírez3, Rodrigo Mendes4, Jos M. Raaijmakers1,2* and Víctor J. Carrión1,2 Abstract Background: Modern crop varieties are typically cultivated in agriculturally well-managed soils far from the centers of origin of their wild relatives. How this habitat expansion impacted plant microbiome assembly is not well understood. Results: Here, we investigated if the transition from a native to an agricultural soil affected rhizobacterial community assembly of wild and modern common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and if this led to a depletion of rhizobacterial diversity. The impact of the bean genotype on rhizobacterial assembly was more prominent in the agricultural soil than in the native soil. Although only 113 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) out of a total of 15,925 were shared by all eight bean accessions grown in native and agricultural soils, this core microbiome represented a large fraction (25.9%) of all sequence reads. More OTUs were exclusively found in the rhizosphere of common bean in the agricultural soil as compared to the native soil and in the rhizosphere of modern bean accessions as compared to wild accessions. Co-occurrence analyses further showed a reduction in complexity of the interactions in the bean rhizosphere microbiome in the agricultural soil as compared to the native soil. Conclusions: Collectively, these results suggest that habitat expansion of common bean from its native soil environment to an agricultural context had an unexpected overall positive effect on rhizobacterial diversity and led to a stronger bean genotype-dependent effect on rhizosphere microbiome assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Comparative Genomics
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Comparative Genomics of Salinispora and the Distribution and Abundance of Secondary Metabolite Genes in Marine Plankton A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology by Kevin Matthew Penn Committee in charge: Paul R. Jensen, Chair Eric Allen Lin Chao Bradley Moore Brian Palenik Forest Rohwer 2012 UMI Number: 3499839 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3499839 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 Copyright Kevin Matthew Penn, 2012 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Kevin Matthew Penn is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my Mom Gail Penn and my Father Lawrence Penn they deserve more credit then any person could imagine. They have supported me through the good times and the bad times. They have never given up on me and they are always excited to know that I am doing well. They just want the best for me.
    [Show full text]