DOCSLIB.ORG

CENTRAIDE of GREATER MONTREAL March 31, 2017 TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL March 31, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditor’s Report 2-3 Statements of operations and fund balance Operating Fund 5 Stabilization Fund 6 Capital Asset Fund 7 Development Fund 8 Collective Impact Project Fund 9 Balance sheet 10-11 Statement of cash flows 12 Notes to the financial statements 13-23 Schedule 1 – Allocations to agencies — Operating Fund 24-34 Schedule 2 – Allocations to agencies — Collective Impact Project Fund 35 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL March 31, 2017 Independent Auditor’s Report To the Members of Centraide of Greater Montreal We have audited the financial statements of Centraide of Greater Montreal, which comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 2017, and the statements of operations and fund balance of Operating Fund, Stabilization Fund, Capital Asset Fund, Development Fund and Collective Impact Project Fund and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Centraide of Greater Montreal as at March 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations. May 23, 2017 1 CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A120628 Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL 3 OPERATING FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND FUND BALANCE Year ended March 31, 2017 Notes 2017 2016 $ $ Revenue Subscriptions 55,597,019 53,455,363 Uncollectible subscriptions ( 1 , 678 , 437 ) (1 , 605 , 000 ) 53,918,582 51,850,363 Interest 147,013 137,519 54,065,595 51,987,882 Expenses Fundraising and operating cost 6 7,479,572 7,475,709 Result before allocations and assistance to agencies 46,586,023 44,512,173 Allocations and assistance to agencies Allocations to agencies (Schedule 1) 42,023,922 42,195,230 Assistance to agencies and community and operating cost 6 3,241,087 3,353,301 45,265,009 45,548,531 Net result (deficit) 1,321,014 ( 1 , 036 , 358 ) Fund balance at beginning 37,172,992 38,209,350 Change in revaluation and other recognized elements (12 , 100 ) – Interfund transfers (370 , 000 ) – Fund balance at end 38,111,906 37,172,992 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL 5 STABILIZATION FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND FUND BALANCE Year ended March 31, 2017 2017 2016 $ $ Revenue Investments 555,166 (137 , 452 ) Net result (deficit) 555,166 (137 , 452 ) Fund balance at beginning 4,778,349 4,915,801 Fund balance at end 5,333,515 4,778,349 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL CAPITAL ASSET FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND FUND BALANCE Year ended March 31, 2017 2017 2016 $ $) Revenue Donation from Centraide of Greater Montréal Foundation 380,000 115,000 Interest 7,363 6,841 Other revenue 32,150 32,150 419,513 153,991 Expenses Amortization of fixed assets 189,622 196,839 Other 188,991 164,562 378,613 361,401 Net result (deficit) 40,900 (207 , 410 ) Fund balance at beginning 5,009,162 5,216,572 Interfund transfer 500,000 – Fund balance at end 5,550,062 5,009,162 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL 7 DEVELOPMENT FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND FUND BALANCE Year ended March 31, 2017 2017 2016 $ $ Revenue Donation from Centraide of Greater Montréal Foundation 150,000 – Other donation 75,500 – Interest 2,480 4,211 227,980 4,211 Expenses Training, research and development costs 189,473 368,072 Net result (deficit) 38,507 (363 , 861 ) Fund balance at beginning 340,777 704,638 Fund balance at end 379,284 340,777 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL COLLECTIVE IMPACT PROJECT FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND FUND BALANCE Year ended March 31, 2017 2017 2016 $ $ Revenue Donations 2,740,000 1,440,000 Interest 15,904 2,085 2,755,904 1,442,085 Expenses Allocations to agencies (Schedule 2) 772,716 – Operating costs 381,379 111,304 1,154,095 111,304 Net result 1,601,809 1,330,781 Fund balance at beginning 1,330,781 – Interfund transfer ( 130 , 000 ) – Fund balance at end 2,802,590 1,330,781 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL 9 BALANCE SHEET As at March 31, 2017 Notes 2017 2016 Operating Stabilization Capital Assets Development Collective Impact Fund Fund Fund Fund Project Fund Total Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Assets Current assets Cash 418,480 – – – – 418,480 1,954,996 Investments, 0.71% to 2.15% (0.65% to 3.05% in 2016) 30,302,731 – – – – 30,302,731 23,581,550 Subscriptions receivable (net of a provision for uncollectible , , , , , , subscriptions of $2,717,650; $2,926,074 in 2016) 16 188 913 – – – – 16 188 913 17083 984 Interfund receivable – – 1,622,357 379,284 2,802,590 – – Other assets 4 1,036,083 – – – – 1,036,083 1,090,871 47,946,207 – 1,622,357 379,284 2,802,590 47,946,207 43,711,401 Investments – 5,335,915 – – – 5,335,915 4,780,749 Fixed assets 3 – – 3,927,705 – – 3,927,705 4,090,307 47,946,207 5,335,915 5,550,062 379,284 2,802,590 57,209,827 52,582,457 Liabilities Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,110,635 2,400 – – – 4,113,035 3,407,271 Balance payable to agencies 280,186 – – – – 280,186 6,224 Interfund payable 4,804,231 – – – – – – Deferred revenue 639,249 – – – – 639,249 536,901 9,834,301 2,400 – – – 5,032,470 3,950,396 Commitment 7 Fund balances Invested in fixed assets – – 5,550,062 – – 5,550,062 5,009,162 Externally restricted – – – 379,284 2,802,590 3,181,874 1,671,558 Internally restricted 38,111,906 5,333,515 – – – 43,445,421 41,951,341 38,111,906 5,333,515 5,550,062 379,284 2,802,590 52,177,357 48,632,061 47,946,207 5,335,915 5,550,062 379,284 2,802,590 57,209,827 52,582,457 * These items are not reported in the Total column because they offset each other. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. Approved by the Board Nathalie Bernier, Chair of the Board 10 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016-2017 | CENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL Notes 2017 2016 Operating Stabilization Capital Assets Development Collective Impact Fund Fund Fund Fund Project Fund Total Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Assets Current assets Cash 418,480 – – – – 418,480 1,954,996 Investments, 0.71% to 2.15% (0.65% to 3.05% in 2016) 30,302,731 – – – – 30,302,731 23,581,550 Subscriptions receivable (net of a provision for uncollectible , , , , , , subscriptions of $2,717,650; $2,926,074 in 2016) 16 188 913 – – – – 16 188 913 17083 984 Interfund receivable – – 1,622,357* 379,284* 2,802,590* – – Other assets 4 1,036,083 – – – – 1,036,083 1,090,871 47,946,207 – 1,622,357 379,284 2,802,590 47,946,207 43,711,401 Investments – 5,335,915 – – – 5,335,915 4,780,749 Fixed assets 3 – – 3,927,705 – – 3,927,705 4,090,307 47,946,207 5,335,915 5,550,062 379,284 2,802,590 57,209,827 52,582,457 Liabilities Current
Recommended publications
  • 3. the Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust by Max Beer

    3. the Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust by Max Beer

    Curr Psychol DOI 10.1007/s12144-007-9017-3 The Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust Max Beer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract In 1993 Hitler and the Nazi party came to power in Germany. At the same time, in Canada in general and in Montreal in particular, anti-Semitism was becoming more widespread. The Canadian Jewish Congress, as a result of the growing tension in Europe and the increase in anti-Semitism at home, was reborn in 1934 and became the authoritative voice of Canadian Jewry. During World War II the Nazis embarked on a campaign that resulted in the systematic extermination of millions of Jews. This article focuses on the Montreal Jewish community, its leadership, and their response to the fate of European Jewry. The study pays particular attention to the Canadian Jewish Congress which influenced the outlook of the community and its subsequent actions. As the war progressed, loyalty to Canada and support for the war effort became the overriding issues for the community and the leadership and concern for their European brethren faded into the background. Keywords Anti-Semitism . Holocaust . Montreal . Quebec . Canada . Bronfman . Uptowners . Downtowners . Congress . Caiserman The 1930s, with the devastating worldwide economic depression and the emergence of Nazism in Germany, set the stage for a war that would result in tens of millions of deaths and the mass extermination of Europe’s Jews. The decade marked a complete stoppage of Jewish immigration to Canada, an increase in anti-Semitism on the North American continent, and the revival of the Canadian Jewish Congress as the voice for the Canadian Jewish community.
  • Demographic Context

    Demographic Context

    Demographic context Greater Montréal encompasses 82 municipalities, broken down into 5 territories, and includes the island of Montréal at its centre and the cities of Longueuil and Laval along the north and south shores. According to the 2016 Census, the Montréal census metropolitan area (CMA) had 4,098,930 inhabitants, up 4.2% from 2011. The Toronto CMA’s population rose 6.2% and the Vancouver CMA’s population rose 6.5% over the same period.1 OVER 800,000 CHILDREN UNDER 18 A total of 821,275 children under age 18 were living in the Montréal CMA in 2016. — 46% were between the ages of 13 and 17 (Figure 1). 1 Unless otherwise indicated, demographic data are taken from the 2016 Census. Figure 1.8 Breakdown of the population under the age of 18 (by age) and in three age categories (%), Montréal census metropolitan area, 2016 Source: Statistics Canada (2017). 2016 Census, product no. 98-400-X2016001 in the Statistics Canada catalogue. The demographic weight of children under age 18 in Montréal is higher than in the rest of Quebec, in Vancouver and in Halifax, but is lower than in Calgary and Edmonton. While the number of children under 18 increased from 2001 to 2016, this group’s demographic weight relative to the overall population gradually decreased: from 21.6% in 2001, to 20.9% in 2006, to 20.3% in 2011, and then to 20% in 2016 (Figures 2 and 3). Figure 2 Demographic weight (%) of children under 18 within the overall population, by census metropolitan area, Canada, 2011 and 2016 22,2 22,0 21,8 21,4 21,1 20,8 20,7 20,4 20,3 20,2 20,2 25,0 20,0 19,0 18,7 18,1 18,0 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 2011 2016 Source: Statistics Canada (2017).
  • Palliative Care Home Care Services, Montreal Region CLSC Postal Code # of MD's # of Nurses Allied Health Professionals Hospice/H

    Palliative Care Home Care Services, Montreal Region CLSC Postal Code # of MD's # of Nurses Allied Health Professionals Hospice/H

    Palliative Care Home Care Services, Montreal region CLSC Postal Code # of MD's # of nurses allied health professionals Hospice/Hospital Prognosis for palliative profile Contact # Lac St Louis H9K – H9T – H9W – H9X 3 2 OT, PT, SW, PAB West Island Palliative Care flexible 514 697-4110 X 3877 H8Y – H8Z – H9A – H9B – Pierrefonds H9C – H9E –H9G –H9H –H9K 2 2 OT, SW, PAB, nutritionist West Island Palliative Care < 1 year Dorval - Lachine H8S-H8T 1 2 OT, SW, PAB Hopital Lachine flexible 514 – 639-0063 X 14254 H4Y-H9P-H9S - H8N-H8P- flexible for RN's, but some MD's only accept < 3 Lasalle Ouest de l'ile H8R 3 2 OT, PT, SW, PAB, nutritionist Champlain, Lachine, WI PCU months 514 - 364 - 2572 X 25100 Mount Sinai, St Raphael, Glen, Jewish René-Cassin H3X- H4V- H4W 4 (Mount Sinai program) 2 PT, OT, SW, psychologist, General < 6 months 514-484-7878 X 61330 OT, PT, SW, psychologist, Mount Sinai, Glen, St Raphael, Jewish NDG/Benny Farm Cavendish H4A-H4B-H4V-H4X 5 (4 from Mount Sinai) 2 spiritual care General flexible 514) 484-7878 ext 61242 Cote-des-neiges H2V-H3P-H3R-H3S-H3T-H3V-H3W-H4P3 1 PT, OT, SW, psychologist St Raphael, Mount Sinai < 6 months 514-731-1386 X 8035 Parc Extension H3N 3 1 PT, OT, SW, psychologist St Raphael, Mount Sinai < 6 months De la Montagne Metro H3A-H3G-H3H-H3Y-H3Z 3 1 PT, OT, SW, psychologist St Raphael, Mount Sinai < 6 months (514)-934-0505 X 7290 Pointe St. Charles H3K Verdun H3E-H4E-H4G-H4H 10 3 SW, OT CHSLD Champlain < 6 months (514) 766-0546 X 53503 Sud-Ouest Verdun St Henri H3C-H3J-H4C-H4Z-H5A 10 1 OT, PT, SW CHSLD Champlain flexible 514 933-7541 X 58445 St-Louis du Parc H2T-H2W Des Faubourgs H2K-H2L-H2X-H2Z-H3R-H5B 2 2 OT, PT, SW, nutritionist Notre Dame, Marie Clarac flexible 514-527-9565 X 3624 Jeanne-Mance Plateau Mont Royal H2H-H2J 2 1 SW, OT, PT, spiritual care CHUM, Hopital Notre Dame < 6 months 514-521-1320 X 6521 Bordeaux-Cartierville H3M-H4J-H4K 3 2 SW CHSLD des Batisseurs flexible (514) 331-2572 X 4169 Bordeaux-Cartierville-St Laurent St.
  • Your Gateway to North American Markets

    Your Gateway to North American Markets

    YOUR GATEWAY TO NORTH AMERICAN MARKETS Biopharmaceuticals Medical technologies Contract research organizations Incubators and accelerators Research centers Rental and construction opportunities GREATER MONTREAL A NETWORK OF INNOVATIVE BUSINESSES Private and public contract research organizations (CRO), medication manufacturers and developers (CMO and CDMO). A HOSPITAL NETWORK Over 30 hospitals, 2 of which are university “super hospitals”: the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and the McGill University Health Centre. A BUSINESS NETWORK BIOQuébec, Montréal In Vivo, Montréal International, Medtech Canada, etc. Biotech City supports the creation and growth of life sciences businesses by offering them an exceptional working environment. Rental spaces, laboratories, land, etc. Access to a network of R&D _ Assistance with funding applications; professionals and partners _ Financing programs available to _ A skilled workforce; SMEs; _ Collaboration between universities; _ Property tax credit; _ Events and networking (local _ International mobility support. ecosystem); _ Venture capital. A SEAMLESS VALUE CHAIN FROM DISCOVERY TO PRODUCTION The result of a partnership between the Ville de Laval and the Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), Biotech City is a business and scientific research centre focused on business development, innovation and business competitiveness. Strategically located near Montreal, Biotech City is also close to several airports. 110 5,500 4.5 1.2 businesses jobs billion in private millions of (multinationals, investments sq. m. dedicated SMEs, start-ups) since 2001 to life sciences and high-tech innovation VANCOUVER 5 h 30 min LAVAL MONTREAL TORONTO 1 h 10 min BOSTON 1 h 15 min NEW YORK 1 h 25 min SAN FRANCISCO 6 h 25 min RALEIGH-DURHAM 3 h 30 min QUEBEC BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTRE (QBIC) The QBIC has acted as an incubator for life sciences and health technologies companies for the past 25 years.
  • Canada's Population 1

    Canada's Population 1

    Canada’s Demographics Reading • Most standard textbooks on the geography of Canada have a population chapter Data Sources • Until September 2013 Census and StatsCan data was released to universities via E-STAT – Site discontinued • Data now available free on the web • Best to use the University’s on-line research guide Statscan Canada’s Population • Canada in 2016 had 36.3 million people • The birth rate is low, and falling – Except among aboriginal peoples • But Canada’s population still grew by 15% 2011-16 Canada’s Population • 2/3 of population growth now through immigration – From global and increasingly non-European sources – Immigrant and aboriginal fertility props up the birth rate • Canada had the fastest population growth in the G8 (5.9% in 2006-11, 15% 2011-16). Canada’s Population • Changes in Canada’s economy drive internal migration, and shift population growth – Nationally, growth connected to resource sector especially of energy resources – Decline of manufacturing jobs, locally, nationally • Population and employment shifts westwards to BC, Prairies. Population Size • Canada 1867: – 3.4 million people • Canada 2016: – 36.3 million people Population Distribution • Where do people live? • What kinds of settlements? Population Distribution • Population Density – People per unit of territory – Usually people/km2 • Canada 2011: – 33.5 Million people – 9.2 Million km2 of land area – 3.6 people/km2 Population Density Varies • Within Canada • 13.4 people/km2 in Ontario – Much higher in south, lower in north • 0.03 people/km2 in
  • Organization and Management of Benny Fram Site Public, Private and Semi-Private Spaces September 25 , 2003

    Organization and Management of Benny Fram Site Public, Private and Semi-Private Spaces September 25 , 2003

    Organization and Management of Benny Fram Site Public, Private and Semi-private Spaces th September 25 , 2003 ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF BENNY FARM SITE INTRODUCTION This report is organized into four sections as follows: 1. Public, Private and Semi-Private Spaces 2. Legal Tools 3. Examples of Residential Projects 4. Recommendations and Next Steps In the first section, we analyze the Benny Farm site in terms of the different property regimes, namely, public, private and semi-private land. We also identify the issues of overall site integration and management. In the second part, we provide two possible legal tools that may be used to ensure that the whole project is integrated in terms of overall architectural style and landscaping quality and that the different areas are properly maintained. In the third part, we provide examples of other residential projects in the Montreal area. Finally, we provide our preliminary recommendations as to which legal regime is best suited for Benny Farm and how you may proceed. 1. PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE SPACES With reference to the site plan prepared by Saia et Barbarese/Claude Cormier in August 2003 (the “Site Plan”), the site may be organized into three property regimes: public, private and semi-private. 1.1 Public Spaces (a) Definition In the event that the City acquires a portion of the northeast corner of the site for a community recreation center, such area will become a public space. The Benny Farm site plan includes a new road west of Cavendish. This road is an extension of Prince of Wales Avenue, which will be transferred to the City and become public.
  • 5.0. Community Architecture in Montreal

    5.0. Community Architecture in Montreal

    5.0. Community Architecture In Montreal The main focus of the last chapter was to present the evolution of community participation in architecture at a global scale. However, since the case study project of this research report is situated in the city of Montréal, Canada, it is also important to present a more local perspective of community-based architecture. The following text accounts the significant events in the history of Montréal that fortified the concept of community participation in architecture in the city. 5.1. The Milton-Park Project At the beginning of this research, one of the main reasons for selecting a project based in Montréal was the feasibility factor due to my location in this city. However, what I did not know at that time was how Montréal has had an active history of community-based initiatives in architecture. One such example and probably the most successful is that of my very neighborhood, popularly known as the McGill Ghetto, located next to the McGill University. The neighborhood is formally known as the Milton-Park area and comprises about eight blocks, which were the “battleground” between the community members residing in this area and a private developer from 1968 to 1983 (Helman 9, 13). Claire Helman in her book, The Milton-Park Affair: Canada’s Largest Citizen-Developer Confrontation, gives a step- by-step account of the efforts of the residents who were involved in a fight to protect their houses and neighborhood from the fate of destruction. In 1860s, the 53 development of the Milton-Park area began with the construction of a new Hotel- Dieu.
  • Laneway House

    Laneway House

    building affordable homes and communities BACKGROUND adverse economic reality demographic transformation new lifestyles archaic technologies still dominate depleting natural resources ignorance of do-it-yourself skills rampant urban sprawl inadequate zoning HOMES the grow home • Narrow-front (14 feet – 16 feet) • Unfinished basement and attic • Choice of interior components and finishes by occupants • Built as condominiums (shared maintenance costs) Plan Wall Area Energy Monthly Component Heat Loss (Watts) Component Heat Loss (Watts) Configuration (m2) Required Heating Cost (KWh) ($) Bungalow Two story Detached Semi-det Rowhouse Roof 558 279 Roof 279 279 279 Plan A (H) 160 2856 134 Walls 1005 1643 Walls 1643 1005 367 Plan B (T) 140 2501 117 Doors and Windows 1598 1598 Doors and Windows 1598 1598 1598 Basement 1560 1249 Basement 1249 780 311 Plan C (L) 123 2198 103 Infiltration 1547 1413 Infiltration 1413 1250 1087 Plan D 112 2001 94 Total 6267 6182 Total 6182 4912 3642 (rectangle) Annual Energy Consumed 9154 9029 Annual Energy 9029 7174 5320 Plan E 106 1894 89 (KWh) Consumed (KWh) (square) Associated Heating Costs $429 $423 Heating Costs $423 $336 $249 Plan F 94 1679 79 (Montreal) (Montreal) (circle) six months later the adoption of innovation curve First Floor Basement First Floor Basement small builders / medium-sized projects previous ownership household type new spaces in basements homeowners’ work the next home • Narrow-front (20 feet – 25 feet) • Buyers select the number of levels • Adaptable and flexible interiors • Optional unfinished basement and attic • Choice of interior components and finishes by occupants • Built as condominiums (shared maintenance costs) • Common outdoor parking X buyer choice: size buyer choice: components buyer choice: layout D a y 2 D a y 3 D a y 4 D a y 5 D a y 6 D a y 7 D a y 8 D a y 9 D a y 12 interior panels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 exterior panels 14’ x 8’ 16’ x 8’ 18’ x 8’ 20’ x 8’ 22’ x 8’ 28’ x 8’ 32’ x 8’ exterior features BALCONY PORCH ENTRY bradford, u.k.
  • Industrial Outlook Q4 2020

    Industrial Outlook Q4 2020

    JLL Research Report Canada | Q4 2020 Research Industrial Outlook Vacancy is once again reaching for historic lows as developers find creative ways to meet demand 2 Industrial Outlook | Canada | Q4 2020 Contents Key trends 3 State of the market 4 Local Markets Metro Vancouver 8 Calgary & Area 9 Greater Edmonton Area 10 Metro Winnipeg 11 Greater Toronto Area 12 Greater Ottawa Area 13 Greater Montréal Area 14 Greater Montréal Area (French) 15 Appendix 17 About JLL 19 Top industrial trends 1. 3 2. 3. After a slight Logistics Large scale multi- midyear uptick companies story industrial vacancy starts to overtake e- facilities make their trend downward commerce with Canadian debut as hitting 2.7% while over 2.7M s.f. of developers rents rise 7.2% in large lease activity scramble to meet 2020 in the fourth demand quarter 4 Industrial Outlook | Canada | Q4 2020 Canada key statistics Quarterly net YTD net Quarterly YTD Under Q4 2020 Total Total absorption absorption Completions Completions construction direct net Inventory (s.f.) vacancy availability (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) rent 1,827,783,548 2.7% 3.8% 5,681,200 18,359,875 5,578,006 22,193,924 26,989,726 $9.92 After a slight uptick during the first wave of the pandemic vacancy and availability trend back down in the fourth quarter Strong user demand to close out 2020 has maintained historically tight market conditions 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% -40 bps Change in Availability rate in Q4 5.0% Vacancy Rate (%) 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Availability Vacancy Source: JLL Research , CoStar, Altus Insite The Canadian Industrial market posted a vacancy rate of acquired almost 500,000 s.f.
  • FORWARD THINKING: a TOD Concept Plan for the Pinecrest Foster Farm Community

    FORWARD THINKING: a TOD Concept Plan for the Pinecrest Foster Farm Community

    FORWARD THINKING: A TOD Concept Plan for the Pinecrest Foster Farm Community 21 December 2018 FORWARD THINKING | SURP 824 This page was intentionally left blank. P A G E ii FORWARD THINKING | SURP 824 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Pinecrest Foster Farm community, located in the City of Ottawa’s west end, is anticipating the arrival of the Pinecrest light rail transit (LRT) station in 2023. Ottawa Community Housing (OCH), as a major affordable housing provider in the City, and as a major property owner in the area, has a key interest in ensuring that affordable housing is provided near the LRT station. OCH, with support from the City of Ottawa, has retained the Project Team to create a concept plan of what Ottawa’s Pinecrest Foster Farm community might look like if it were redeveloped according to transit-oriented development (TOD) principles. The Concept Plan is looking to a final build-out in 2035. The vision for Pinecrest Foster Farm is to create an inclusive, mixed-use, and transit-oriented community that is a safe and liveable environment for residents and visitors. The geographic scope for this project is differentiated by the Study Area, the site, and OCH-owned property (Figure 1). The Study Area defines a broad area of interest surrounding the future Pinecrest LRT Station, with a focus on lands north of the Highway 417 and west of Pinecrest Road. The site, which is comprised of key lands to be considered for redevelopment, is the focus of the Concept Plan. The site itself is comprised of nineteen hectares of land, which include OCH, municipal, and provincial properties, as well as a few key non-residential private properties.
  • Aviation Investigation Report A93O0343

    Aviation Investigation Report A93O0343

    AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT LOSS OF CONTROL BEECH B58P BARON C-FKSB TORONTO ISLAND AIRPORT, ONTARIO 1.8 nm W 09 OCTOBER 1993 REPORT NUMBER A93O0343 MANDATE OF THE TSB The Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act provides the legal framework governing the TSB's activities. Basically, the TSB has a mandate to advance safety in the marine, pipeline, rail, and aviation modes of transportation by: ! conducting independent investigations and, if necessary, public inquiries into transportation occurrences in order to make findings as to their causes and contributing factors; ! reporting publicly on its investigations and public inquiries and on the related findings; ! identifying safety deficiencies as evidenced by transportation occurrences; ! making recommendations designed to eliminate or reduce any such safety deficiencies; and ! conducting special studies and special investigations on transportation safety matters. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. However, the Board must not refrain from fully reporting on the causes and contributing factors merely because fault or liability might be inferred from the Board's findings. INDEPENDENCE To enable the public to have confidence in the transportation accident investigation process, it is essential that the investigating agency be, and be seen to be, independent and free from any conflicts of interest when it investigates accidents, identifies safety deficiencies, and makes safety recommendations. Independence is a key feature of the TSB. The Board reports to Parliament through the President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada and is separate from other government agencies and departments. Its independence enables it to be fully objective in arriving at its conclusions and recommendations.
  • Chantiers De Construction En Cours

    Chantiers De Construction En Cours

    Chantiers de construction en cours Agglomération de Montréal Décembre 2012 Une publication de Montréal en statistiques Nombre de Valeur Division de la planification urbaine chantiers (M $) Direction de l’urbanisme et du développement économique Agglomération de Montréal 120 14 781,3 Service de la mise en valeur du territoire Montréal 111 14 242,1 Ahuntsic-Cartierville 7 318,2 120 chantiers en cours Anjou 1 86,0 14,8 milliards de dollars d’investissements Côte-des-Neiges–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce 9 2 768,4 Lachine 0 0,0 La Commission de la construction du Québec a récemment publié la liste des LaSalle 4 354,3 chantiers en cours en décembre dernier sur le territoire de l’agglomération de Le Plateau-Mont-Royal 3 52,0 Montréal. Nos compilations spéciales révèlent que : Le Sud-Ouest 12 2 110,0 • parmi les chantiers en cours sur l’île de Montréal, on compte 65 projets L'Île-Bizard–Sainte-Geneviève - - résidentiels, 37 projets institutionnels et commerciaux, 16 projets de génie Mercier–Hochelaga-Maisonneuve 7 832,5 civil et de voirie ainsi que 2 projets industriels Montréal-Nord 5 115,3 Outremont 1 120,0 • l’institutionnel et le commercial comptent pour 46 % de la valeur totale des Pierrefonds-Roxboro 3 96,8 chantiers, soit 6,7 G$ et la valeur des projets industriels s’élève à 184 M$, soit Rivière-des-Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles 4 210,0 1,2 % des investissements totaux Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie 3 39,0 Saint-Laurent 8 617,0 • les trois arrondissements qui bénéficient le plus des sommes investies dans Saint-Léonard 1 183,9 l’agglomération sont Ville-Marie