The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE Much in Little Revisited: The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger R.E. Velema, Department of History, University of Amsterdam Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Republican Tradition: From the Hanseatic League to the Era of the Enlightenment’, European University at St. Petersburg, December 7-9, 2012 Not to be quoted or cited without permission from the author It is more than half a century ago that R.R. Palmer, who was soon to become famous with his magisterial work The Age of the Democratic Revolution, introduced an international scholarly audience to the Dutch revolution of 1795, also known as the Batavian revolution. In his pioneering article ‘Much in Little: the Dutch Revolution of 1795’, he pointed out that the fall of the Dutch ancien régime and the revolutionary transformation of the Netherlands that followed this downfall could best be understood as part of an international and interlinked series of revolutionary events.1 On a small scale, the Batavian revolution therefore could serve to ‘illuminate the whole complex of war and revolution which then gripped the Western world’.2 As he made abundantly clear in the title of his later magnum opus, Palmer had a relatively simple and straightforward view of the struggles that tore the Western world of the late eighteenth century apart. Just as democracy had been at issue in the Dutch revolution of 1795, the whole European and American world of the final decades of the century of Enlightenment saw the rise of a new and historically unprecedented democratic opposition against all sorts of aristocratic ‘constituted bodies’. The international democratic movement of the later eighteenth century opposed ‘the possession of government, or any public power, by any established, privileged, closed, or self-recruiting group of men’.3 In Palmer’s view, this democratic movement was a more or less direct consequence of the progressive political thought of the Enlightenment and was the very embodiment of political modernity. Indeed, the ‘Age of the Democratic Revolution’, of which the Dutch revolution of 1795 was such a perfect example, undoubtedly was the most crucial episode in the rise of the modern political world. In the more than fifty years that have passed since Palmer developed his thesis about the ‘Age of the Democratic Revolution’, scholarship on both the politics and the political thought of the eighteenth century has been transformed.4 From the perspective of the history of political thought, perhaps the most crucial development since Palmer formulated his thesis has been the discovery of early modern republicanism and of its continued importance during the eighteenth century. Already in 1971, just a few years after the appearance of the second volume of Palmer’s Age of the Democratic Revolution, the Italian historian Franco Venturi suggested that ‘it is more worthwhile to follow the involvement, modifications and dispersion 1 R.R. Palmer, ‘Much in Little: The Dutch Revolution of 1795’, Journal of Modern History 26 (1954) 15-35; R.R. Palmer, The Age of the Democratic Revolution. A Political History of Europe and America, 1760-1800 (2 vols. Princeton 1959-1964). 2 Palmer, ‘Much in Little’, 15. 3 Palmer, Age of the Democratic Revolution, I, 4. 4 Recent reassessments of the Palmer thesis include Wim Klooster, Revolutions in the Atlantic World: A Comparative History (New York 2009); Manuela Albertone and Antonino de Francesco, ed. Rethinking the Atlantic World: Europe and America in the Age of Democratic Revolution (Basingstoke 2009) and David Armitage and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, ed. The Age of Revolution in Global Context, c. 1760-1840 (Basingstoke 2010). of the republican tradition in the last years of the eighteenth century, than to examine the emergence of the idea of democracy in those same years’.5 Since then, the work of John Pocock, Quentin Skinner and many of their pupils has provided us with a rich and complex panorama of the varieties of early modern – and ultimately classical – republican thought. Yet until very recently, this new historiography of republicanism presented students of the European revolutions of the late eighteenth century with a curious problem, since it largely ignored Venturi’s illuminating suggestion and therefore failed to include the revolutions analyzed by Palmer in the history of republican political thought. John Pocock, who in his Machiavellian Moment famously described the American revolution as the ‘last act of the civic Renaissance’, has remained remarkably silent about the fate of the Atlantic republican tradition in all other late eighteenth-century revolutions.6 Quentin Skinner, too, has shown himself rather reluctant to discuss the relationship between neo-roman thought and the revolutions of the later eighteenth century in any detail. The eighteenth-century rise of classical utilitarianism and liberalism, he simply tells us, meant that ‘the theory of free states fell increasingly into disrepute, and eventually slipped almost wholly out of sight’.7 The two leading analysts of early modern republicanism thus, for once, seem to agree: the early modern republican tradition came to an abrupt end at some point in time before the eruption of the French revolution and was replaced completely by something else, be it utilitarianism or liberalism. Virtue gave way to rights; liberty no longer meant living in a free state, but just being free from coercion and interference.8 Both the Palmer-thesis and the historiography on early modern republicanism thus present the student of the late eighteenth-century continental European revolutions with the image of a complete watershed. The sudden emergence of ‘democracy’ and ‘liberalism’, almost ex nihilo, is held to constitute a clean break with both the institutions of the old order and its various modes of political discourse. The most obvious problem with this entire line of interpretation is the fact that late eighteenth-century European revolutionaries, while certainly shedding the pejorative connotations which had always been attached to the term ‘democracy’, never used the term liberalism and first and foremost regarded themselves as republicans. Indeed, these were the very decades in which the term ‘republicanism’ was invented and was for the first time widely used in public discourse.9 It might of course be argued that the revolutionary use of republican vocabulary is in fact a case of spurious persistence and that continuities in vocabulary mask fundamental changes in substance. 10 The ‘modern’ republic the revolutionaries envisaged, in other words, was something fundamentally different from both the classical and the early modern republic. There is certainly something to be said for this point of view, for it is undeniably true that many late eighteenth-century republicans considered the republics they were trying to establish as 5 Franco Venturi, Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment (Cambridge 1971) 90. 6 J.G.A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton 1975) 462. 7 Quentin Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge 1998) 96. 8 J.G.A. Pocock, ‘Virtues, rights, and manners: A model for historians of political thought’ , in: J.G.A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge 1985) 37-50; Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism, 96-99. 9 On the conceptual history of ‘republic’ and ‘republicanism’ see Wolfgang Mager, ‘Republik’ , in: Otto Brunner, Werner Conze and Reinhardt Koselleck, ed. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch- sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (8 vols. Stuttgart, 1972 - 1997) V, 549-651. 10The term ‘spurious persistence’ was coined by Peter Gay in his polemic with Carl Becker. See Peter Gay, ‘Carl Becker’s Heavenly City’, in: Peter Gay, The Party of Humanity. Essays in the French Enlightenment (New York 1971) 188-210. something new and historically unprecedented.11 Yet it is equally undeniable that a great number of the conceptual problems they were wrestling with were rooted in the pre-existing republican tradition. Rather than constituting a clean break with the republican past, late eighteenth-century revolutionary republicanism should therefore be understood as an extremely complex intellectual struggle to adapt classical and early modern republicanism to the circumstances of the modern age. That such a case can indeed be convincingly argued has particularly transpired in recent scholarship on the French case. In a rather dramatic shift of emphasis, historians have started to argue that viewing French revolutionary republicanism as an attempted transformation of rather than as a complete break with classical and early modern republicanism allows us a much deeper and better understanding of French late eighteenth-century republican discourse than was the case hitherto.12 It also allows us to see the eventual emergence of liberalism more as a gradual development than as a sudden and dramatic rupture with the republican past. In the words of Andreas Kalyvas and Ira Katznelson: ‘liberalism as we know it was born from the spirit of republicanism, from the attempts to adapt republicanism to the political, economic, and social revolutions of the eighteenth century and the first decades of the nineteenth’, or more succinctly: ‘political liberalism burst from the shell of a republican chrysalis’.13 Both the rise of the historiography of republicanism in general and our recent renewed understanding of the relationship between classical and early modern republicanism on the one hand, and the republican revolutions of the later eighteenth century on the other, provide ample reasons to take a new look at the Dutch revolution of 1795. Palmer was indeed right in suggesting that the Batavian revolution of 1795 offered ‘much in little’ to the historian, but his preoccupation with the sudden rise of modern democracy prevented him from seeing that the true richness of this revolution must be sought in its attempt to transform the classical and early modern republican tradition and to adapt it to the modern age.
Recommended publications
  • And the Jena 6: a Tragedy in Three Acts Anthony V
    Washington University Jurisprudence Review Volume 2 | Issue 2 2010 ‘Slavery’ and the Jena 6: A Tragedy in Three Acts Anthony V. Baker Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence Part of the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Anthony V. Baker, ‘Slavery’ and the Jena 6: A Tragedy in Three Acts, 2 Wash. U. Jur. Rev. 212 (2010). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol2/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Jurisprudence Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. `SLAVERY' AND THE JENA 6: A TRAGEDY IN THREE ACTS ANTHONY V. BAKER* "WA remain imprisoned by the past as long as we deny its influence in the present."1 I. PROLOGUE: ART . AND CRAFT Law changes things. A world of received and perceived meaning lies within this three-word mantra—the mantra of the post-Hurstian2 legal historian. For the law-in-history legal * Visiting Professor, Atlanta's John Marshall Law School; Professor of Law, the Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law, Campbell University; LL.M, University of Wisconsin Law School (1998); J.D., University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill (1981); A.B., Duke University (1977). A draft of this paper was presented at the Southeast/Southwest People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference 2008, at North Carolina Central University School of Law in Durham, North Carolina. Thanks to conference participants for the helpful responses to the presented draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodewijk Napoleon En Het Einde Van De Republikeinse Politiek Wyger R.E
    P147-158 Wyger R.E. Velema:P147-158 Wyger R.E. Velema 13-12-2006 15:06 Pagina 147 Lodewijk Napoleon en het einde van de republikeinse politiek Wyger R.E. Velema ‘Een koningrijk! Ja mijn vriend, zoover is het eindelijk met ons land gekomen’, schreef Anton Reinhard Falck op 13 juni 1806, in een brief vol walging en ver- ontwaardiging, aan Johan Hora Siccama in Groningen.1 Hij was bepaald niet de enige tijdgenoot die met afgrijzen en verbazing reageerde op het definitieve einde van de republikeinse regeringsvorm, een regeringsvorm die twee eeuwen lang, weliswaar met telkens andere argumenten maar altijd in de overtuiging van haar superioriteit aan iedere vorm van monarchie, in eensgezindheid door de Nederlanders was geroemd. Gedurende de gehele achttiende eeuw, om niet verder in de tijd terug te gaan, waren eerst Staatsgezinden en Orangisten en la- ter ook revolutionairen en conservatieven het, bij al hun vaak fundamentele onderlinge politieke meningsverschillen, over één ding eens geweest: het land was een republiek en diende dat te blijven. Gezien deze opmerkelijke continuï- teit in republikeinse politieke gezindheid, zou men mogen verwachten dat de abrupte overgang naar een monarchale regeringsvorm in 1806 door historici grondig is onderzocht en uitputtend is geanalyseerd. Niets is echter minder waar. Net als de politieke en politiek theoretische geschiedenis van het hele de- cennium waarin deze transitie plaatsvond, is de vestiging van de monarchie on- der Lodewijk Napoleon een onderbelicht onderdeel in de geschiedschrijving over het ontstaan van het moderne Nederland gebleven. De verklaring voor deze hardnekkige lacune moet ten dele worden gezocht in de manier waarop historici tegenwoordig de decennia rond 1800 indelen.
    [Show full text]
  • De Tweede Wereldoorlog Een Totale Oorlog in Nieuwe Historische Kaders 450
    Inhoud Redactioneel 448 Kees Ribbens Global dimensions van de Tweede Wereldoorlog Een totale oorlog in nieuwe historische kaders 450 Karel Davids De Tweede Wereldoorlog: een breuk in de economische ontwikkeling in de wereld? 464 Remco Raben De Tweede Wereldoorlog in Indonesië als een geschiedenis van beweging en begrenzing 476 Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis - 122e jaargang, nummer 4 Floris Vletter De Bataafse Burgermacht als bolwerk der vrijheid De politieke en militaire betekenis van een burgerschapsideaal 492 Wouter Groot en Karel Dibbets Welke Slag aan de Somme? Oorlog en neutraliteit in Nederlandse bioscopen, 1914-1918 508 Maar ten Van Ginderachter Het vaderland vanuit kikker- perspectief Recent Belgisch en Nederlands onderzoek naar natievorming tijdens de lange negentiende eeuw 522 Anneleen Arnout Lieux de mémoire Erfgoed en geschiedenis 538 Summaries 550 Recensies 552 Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis - 122e jaargang, nummer 4 448 Redactioneel Terwijl de 65-jarige bevrijding van opeenvol- Op mondiaal niveau zijn deze en soortge- gende delen van Nederland wordt herdacht, lijke vragen niet minder relevant. Dat hangt weerklinkt hier en daar de gedachte dat ‘de deels samen met het gegroeide besef van glo- oorlog’ nu met pensioen gaat. Inderdaad balisering, een fenomeen dat ook de blik van neemt de temporele afstand tot de Tweede historici beïnvloedt. Naarmate de geschiedwe- Wereldoorlog toe. Maar een aanzienlijke tenschap beter zicht krijgt op deze historische vermindering van de nog altijd ruime belang- ontwikkeling blijkt de toegenomen internatio- stelling voor dit wereldwijde conflict lijkt op nale verwevenheid op uiteenlopende terreinen korte termijn onwaarschijnlijk. Evenwel blijkt een langere en minder eenduidige geschiede- de blik waarmee deze oorlog wordt bezien nis te hebben dan veelal wordt aangenomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Van Tekst
    In het land der blinden Willem Oltmans bron Willem Oltmans, In het land der blinden. Papieren tijger, Breda 2001 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/oltm003inhe01_01/colofon.php © 2015 dbnl / Willem Oltmans Stichting 2 voor Jozias van Aartsen Willem Oltmans, In het land der blinden 7 1 Start Op 10 augustus 1953 besteeg ik voor het eerst de lange trappen naar de bovenste verdieping van het gebouw van het Algemeen Handelsblad aan de Nieuwezijds Voorburgwal in Amsterdam om mijn leven als journalist te beginnen. Chef van de redactie buitenland was dr. Anton Constandse. Van 1946 tot en met 1948 had ik de opleiding voor de diplomatieke dienst gevolgd van het Nederlands Opleidings Instituut voor het Buitenland (NOIB) op Nijenrode. Van 1948 tot en met 1950 volgde ik op het Yale College in New Haven, Connecticut, de studie Political Science and International Relations. Inmiddels 25 jaar geworden twijfelde ik steeds meer aan een leven als ambtenaar van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Was ik niet een te vrijgevochten en te zelfstandig denkende vogel om zonder tegensputteren of mokken braaf Haagse opdrachten uit te voeren waar ik het wellicht faliekant mee oneens zou zijn? Van een dergelijke incompatibilité d'humeurs zou immers alleen maar gedonder kunnen komen. Op het Yale College had ik in dit verband al het een en ander meegemaakt. In 1949 was ik tot praeses van de Yale International Club gekozen, een organisatie voor de in New Haven studerende buitenlandse studenten. Nederland knokte in die dagen onder de noemer van ‘politionele acties’ tegen Indonesië. Ik nodigde ambassadeur F.C.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ENTER the GHOST Cashless Payments in the Early Modern Low
    ENTER THE GHOST Cashless payments in the Early Modern Low Countries, 1500-18001 Oscar Gelderbloma and Joost Jonkera, b Abstract We analyze the evolution of payments in the Low Countries during the period 1500-1800 to argue for the historical importance of money of account or ghost money. Aided by the adoption of new bookkeeping practices such as ledgers with current accounts, this convention spread throughout the entire area from the 14th century onwards. Ghost money eliminated most of the problems associated with paying cash by enabling people to settle transactions in a fictional currency accepted by everyone. As a result two functions of money, standard of value and means of settlement, penetrated easily, leaving the third one, store of wealth, to whatever gold and silver coins available. When merchants used ghost money to record credit granted to counterparts, they in effect created a form of money which in modern terms might count as M1. Since this happened on a very large scale, we should reconsider our notions about the volume of money in circulation during the Early Modern Era. 1 a Utrecht University, b University of Amsterdam. The research for this paper was made possible by generous fellowships at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies (NIAS) in Wassenaar. The Meertens Institute and Hester Dibbits kindly allowed us to use their probate inventory database, which Heidi Deneweth’s incomparable efforts reorganized so we could analyze the data. We thank participants at seminars in Utrecht and at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, and at the Silver in World History conference, VU Amsterdam, December 2014, for their valuable suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 Hugh Dunthorne Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83747-7 - Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 Hugh Dunthorne Frontmatter More information Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 England’s response to the Revolt of the Netherlands (1568–1648) has been studied hitherto mainly in terms of government policy, yet the Dutch struggle with Habsburg Spain affected a much wider commu- nity than just the English political elite. It attracted attention across Britain and drew not just statesmen and diplomats but also soldiers, merchants, religious refugees, journalists, travellers and students into the confl ict. Hugh Dunthorne draws on pamphlet literature to reveal how British contemporaries viewed the progress of their near neigh- bours’ rebellion, and assesses the lasting impact which the Revolt and the rise of the Dutch Republic had on Britain’s domestic history. The book explores affi nities between the Dutch Revolt and the British civil wars of the seventeenth century – the fi rst major challenges to royal authority in modern times – showing how much Britain’s chang- ing commercial, religious and political culture owed to the country’s involvement with events across the North Sea. HUGH DUNTHORNE specializes in the history of the early modern period, the Dutch revolt and the Dutch republic and empire, the his- tory of war, and the Enlightenment. He was formerly Senior Lecturer in History at Swansea University, and his previous publications include The Enlightenment (1991) and The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the Low Countries
    [Show full text]
  • Bijdragen En Mededeelingen Van Het Historisch Genootschap. Deel 31
    Bijdragen en Mededeelingen van het Historisch Genootschap. Deel 31 bron Bijdragen en Mededeelingen van het Historisch Genootschap. Deel 31. Johannes Müller, Amsterdam 1910 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_bij005191001_01/colofon.php © 2012 dbnl i.s.m. I Verslag van het bestuur over het dienstjaar 1909. In tegenstelling met het vorige jaar hebben wij ditmaal weinig over onszelf mede te deelen. In de samenstelling van het actieve gedeelte van het Bestuur bracht het achter ons liggende jaar geen verandering, doch ons honorair lid mochten wij niet lang meer behouden. De hoop, die wij in het vorige Verslag uitspraken, dat Mr. Baert nog lang, zij het dan ook door een losser band eraan verbonden, voor het Bestuur behouden mocht blijven, is niet verwezenlijkt. In Mei, toen ons Verslag over 1908 nog niet eens onze leden had bereikt, is hij op 75-jarigen leeftijd heengegaan. Wat hij voor het Genootschap en het Bestuur geweest is, hebben wij reeds het vorige jaar gezegd; nu past ons slechts een woord van eerbiedige en dankbare herinnering. Het ledental van het Genootschap bleef stationnair, wat ons bij het stijgen van onze noodzakelijke uitgaven niet geheel zonder bezorgdheid laat. Door overlijden en bedanken verdwenen de namen van één honorair lid en 24 gewone leden van onze lijst, terwijl wij ons genoodzaakt zagen één lid wegens wanbetaling te schrappen. Tegenover dit verlies van 24 gewone leden staat een aanwinst van een gelijk aantal Bijdragen en Mededeelingen van het Historisch Genootschap. Deel 31 II nieuw toegetredenen. Als Bijlage A tot dit Verslag volgt hierachter de lijst der 30 honoraire en 475 gewone leden, die het Genootschap op 1 Januari 1910 telde.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioniers in Schaduwbeeld: Het Eerste Parlement Van Nederland 1796-1798
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796-1798 Oddens, J. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Oddens, J. (2012). Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796- 1798. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 HOOFDSTUK I Bewustwording Er werd in de stilte der nacht allerwegen in stede en dorpen een boekje gestrooit […] Ontzettend was de indruk, die deze verassing baarde […] Geheel Nederland ontwaarde met schrik en verontwaardiging dat in geheel Nederland geen wettig bestuur bestond. – Pieter Vreede1 alverwege de jaren dertig van de negentiende eeuw diepte Pieter Vreede, in zijn hoogtijdagen een van de markantste leden van het Bataafse parlement, een iconische H gebeurtenis op uit zijn geheugen.2 In de herinnering van Vreede was het volk van Nederland op de ochtend van 26 september 1781 ontwaakt uit meer dan nachtrust alleen.
    [Show full text]
  • Fred Vogelzang De Baronie Ijsselstein Werd Tot 1795 Direct Door De Stadhouders Be­
    Fred Vogelzang De baronie IJsselstein werd tot 1795 direct door de stadhouders be­ stuurd. In de jaren '80 van de achttiende eeuw kwam de stadhouder on­ der vuur te liggen van de zogenaamde patriotten. In dit artikel wordt onderzocht, hoe deze protestbeweging in IJsselstein opereerde. Het blijkt dat de bevolking zeer verdeeld was. Een machtsstrijd ontspon zich, die aanvankelijk door de patriotten gewonnen leek te worden. Ze dwongen de heroprichting van de schutterij af en usurpeerden alle officiersposten. Tegen de bedoeling in functioneerde die schutterij niet als het middel om I de IJsselsteiners te doordringen van Fred Vogelzang(i96i) studeerde geschiedenis aan de universiteiten van Utrecht en Leiden en was daarna de patriotse idealen. Al snel werden een aantal jaren werkzaam als docent en wetenschap-^' , . , ,^, §jfiÉ| het gedwongen exerceren en wachtlo- pelijk onderzoeker aan de universitaire lerarenoplei­ ding in Utrecht, Vervolgens trad hij in dienst bij de Pcn Juist de aanleiding tot veel verzet Federatie Stichts Cultureel Erfgoed, nu Erfgoedhuis . % ^ • _ I tegen de patriotten. Utrecht, als consulent regionale geschiedenis. In die functie ondersteunt hij professionele en vrijetijdshis- Een tweede kans doemde voor de torici die zich bezig houden met de geschiedenis van _ _ L I patriotten op toen het gewest stad en provincie Utrecht. Hij is betrokken bij diverse publicaties en series op dat gebied. I Holland patriotse troepen in IJsselstein legerde. Die inkwartiering drukte echter zwaar op de bevolking. Bovendien bleken de troepen even­ min achter de patriotse leiders te staan, waardoor het ieder moment tot een gewapend treffen tussen burgers, schutters en Hollandse militairen kon komen.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Revolution Institute Plan of Instruction on the American Revolution
    The American Revolution Institute Plan of Instruction on the American Revolution In order to ensure proper understanding and appreciation of the American Revolution and its legacy, the American Revolution Institute of the Society of the Cincinnati has developed this plan of instruction on the American Revolution for students in grades nine through twelve. The plan is designed to be followed during that part of a secondary school course on U.S. history that covers the period between 1754 and 1791, beginning with the French and Indian War and ending with the ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights. The American Revolution Institute recommends that each state, or as local circumstances may dictate, each school district, adopt a version of this plan. The plan is based on the interpretive framework developed by the American Revolution Institute to organize and synthesize the enduring achievements of the American Revolution and presents them in a way that makes sense of an extremely complex series of social, economic, political, intellectual, legal, and constitutional developments spanning nearly forty years. That interpretive framework rests on the best advanced scholarship on the Revolution published over the last seventy years, an extraordinary body of creative work that places the American Revolution at the center of American history. Students taught according to this plan of instruction should learn that the American Revolution: • secured the independence of the United States from British rule; • established republics in each of the independent states as well as a federal government based on republican principles; • created American national identity; and • committed the new nation to ideals of liberty, equality, natural and civil rights, and responsible citizenship that have shaped American history for nearly 250 years.
    [Show full text]
  • "SOLIZE India Technologies Private Limited" 56553102 .FABRIC 34354648 @Fentures B.V
    Erkende referenten / Recognised sponsors Arbeid Regulier en Kennismigranten / Regular labour and Highly skilled migrants Naam bedrijf/organisatie Inschrijfnummer KvK Name company/organisation Registration number Chamber of Commerce "@1" special projects payroll B.V. 70880565 "SOLIZE India Technologies Private Limited" 56553102 .FABRIC 34354648 @Fentures B.V. 82701695 01-10 Architecten B.V. 24257403 100 Grams B.V. 69299544 10X Genomics B.V. 68933223 12Connect B.V. 20122308 180 Amsterdam BV 34117849 1908 Acquisition B.V. 60844868 2 Getthere Holding B.V. 30225996 20Face B.V. 69220085 21 Markets B.V. 59575417 247TailorSteel B.V. 9163645 24sessions.com B.V. 64312100 2525 Ventures B.V. 63661438 2-B Energy Holding 8156456 2M Engineering Limited 17172882 30MHz B.V. 61677817 360KAS B.V. 66831148 365Werk Contracting B.V. 67524524 3D Hubs B.V. 57883424 3DUniversum B.V. 60891831 3esi Netherlands B.V. 71974210 3M Nederland B.V. 28020725 3P Project Services B.V. 20132450 4DotNet B.V. 4079637 4People Zuid B.V. 50131907 4PS Development B.V. 55280404 4WEB EU B.V. 59251778 50five B.V. 66605938 5CA B.V. 30277579 5Hands Metaal B.V. 56889143 72andSunny NL B.V. 34257945 83Design Inc. Europe Representative Office 66864844 A. Hak Drillcon B.V. 30276754 A.A.B. International B.V. 30148836 A.C.E. Ingenieurs en Adviesbureau, Werktuigbouw en Electrotechniek B.V. 17071306 A.M. Best (EU) Rating Services B.V. 71592717 A.M.P.C. Associated Medical Project Consultants B.V. 11023272 A.N.T. International B.V. 6089432 A.S. Watson (Health & Beauty Continental Europe) B.V. 31035585 A.T. Kearney B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]