Afghanistan ORBAT
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Afghanistan Order of Battle by Wesley Morgan December 2012
Coalition Combat Forces in Afghanistan AFGHANISTAN ORDER OF BATTLE by Wesley Morgan December 2012 This document describes the composition and placement of U.S. and other Western combat forces in Afghanistan down to battalion level. It includes the following categories of units: maneuver (i.e. infantry, armor, and cavalry) units, which in most cases are responsible for particular districts or provinces; artillery units, including both those acting as provisional maneuver units and those in traditional artillery roles; aviation units, both rotary and fixed-wing; military police units; most types of engineer and explosive ordnance disposal units; and “white” special operations forces, described in general terms. It does not include “black” special operations units or other units such as logistical, transportation, medical, and intelligence units or Provincial Reconstruction Teams. International Security Assistance Force / United States ForcesAfghanistan (Gen. John Allen, USMC)ISAF Headquarters, Kabul Special Operations Joint Task ForceAfghanistan / NATO Special Operations Component CommandAfghanistan (Maj. Gen. Raymond Thomas III, USA)Camp Integrity, Kabul1 Combined Joint Special Operations Task ForceAfghanistan (USA)Bagram Airfield; village stability operations, Afghan commando advisors, and other SOF missions2 Special Operations Task ForceEast (USA)Bagram Airfield; operating in eastern Afghanistan Special Operations Task ForceSouth (USA)Kandahar Airfield; operating in Kandahar Province Special Operations Task ForceSouth-East (USN)U/I location; operating in Uruzgan and Zabul Provinces Special Operations Task ForceWest (USMC)Camp Lawton, Herat; operating in western Afghanistan and Helmand Province TF Balkh / 2-7 Infantry (Lt. Col. Todd Kelly, USA)Camp Mike Spann, Mazar-e-Sharif; operating in northern Afghanistan 3 TF 3-69 Armor (Lt. Col. Orestees Davenport, USA)U/I location; possibly attached to CJSOTF-A in Ghazni Province 4 ISAF Special Operations Forces / Special Operations Command and Control Element (Brig. -
A1, A2, A3, A7 Sep 22 Semifinal.Indd
Celebrating 100 Years of Marine Aviation Vol. 69, No. 38 www.cherrypoint.marines.mil September 22, 2011 ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ law repealed after nearly 2 decades CPL. SAMUEL A. NASSO MCAS CHERRY POINT Gays and lesbians may openly serve in the military, due to the recent repeal of Title 10 of the U.S. Code, Section 654, more commonly known as the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law. The DADT law, established in 1993, allowed gays to serve as long as they kept their sexual orientation private. The repeal, enacted through a congressional bill in December, went into effect Tuesday, after the DOD certifi ed that current military members have been trained to adjust to the new policy. President Barack Obama certifi ed to Congress on July 22 that the U.S. Armed Forces have “prepared the necessary policies and regulations” to effectuate repeal and that implementation of these policies and regulations is consistent with the standards of military readiness, military effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention of the Armed Forces. A 60- LANCE CPL. SCOTT L. TOMASZYCKI day waiting period was then enacted before the new Tour guide Onofre Vellos gives the Marines of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 365 a Mayan math lesson atop policy took effect. a ruin at Altun Ha, Belize, Sept. 14. Despite never moving past the Stone Age, the Mayans were still experts “We have all been trained and without a doubt in astronomy and mathematics. For example, they had a numeral to represent zero, or lack of value, which is we are going to continue to execute our mission something that Roman numerals lack. -
Always a Marine” Men’S Hoodie for Me City State Zip in the Size Indicated Below As Described in This Announcement
MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES 4 1 0 2 LY U J Leathernwwew.mca-marcines.org/lekatherneck Happy Birthday, America Iraq 2004: Firefghts in the “City of Mosques” Riding With the Mounted Color Guard Settling Scores: The Battle to Take Back Guam A Publication of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation Cov1.indd 1 6/12/14 12:04 PM Welcome to Leatherneck Magazine’s Digital Edition July 2014 We hope you are continuing to enjoy the digital edition of Leatherneck with its added content and custom links to related information. Our commitment to expanding our digital offerings continues to refect progress. Also, access to added content is available via our website at www.mca- marines.org/leatherneck and you will fnd reading your Leatherneck much easier on smartphones and tablets. Our focus of effort has been on improving our offerings on the Internet, so we want to hear from you. How are we doing? Let us know at: [email protected]. Thank you for your continuing support. Semper Fidelis, Col Mary H. Reinwald, USMC (Ret) Editor How do I navigate through this digital edition? Click here. L If you need your username and password, call 1-866-622-1775. Welcome Page Single R New Style.indd 2 6/12/14 11:58 AM ALWAYS FAITHFUL. ALWAYS READY. Cov2.indd 1 6/9/14 10:31 AM JULY 2014, VOL. XCVII, No. 7 Contents LEATHERNECK—MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES FEATURES 10 The In-Between: Touring the Korean DMZ 30 100 Years Ago: Marines at Vera Cruz By Roxanne Baker By J. -
Afghanistan ORBAT
CoaLITION CombaT AND ADVISORY FoRCES IN AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN ORDER OF BATTLE BY WESLEY MORGAN AUGUST 2014 This document describes the composition and placement of U.S. and other Western combat and advisory forces in Afghanistan down to battalion level. It includes the following categories of units: maneuver and advisory (i.e. infantry, armor, and cavalry) units; artillery units; aviation units, both rotary and fixed-wing; military police units; most types of engineer and explosive ordnance disposal units; and “white” special operations forces. It does not include “black” special operations units or other units such as logistical, transportation, medical, and intelligence units or Provincial Reconstruction Teams. International Security Assistance Force / United States ForcesAfghanistan (Gen. Joseph Dunford, USMC)ISAF Headquarters, Kabul Kabul Support Unit / 1 Coldstream Guards (Lt. Col. Toby Till, UK)Camp Souter, Kabul; security force supporting British personnel and facilities and ISAF headquarters1 TF 1-Fury / 1-508 Parachute Infantry (USA)U/I location Special Operations Joint Task ForceAfghanistan / NATO Special Operations Component CommandAfghanistan (Maj. Gen. Ed Reeder, USA)Camp Integrity, Kabul2 Combined Joint Special Operations Task ForceAfghanistan (USA)Bagram Airfield; village stability operations, advisors to Afghan Defense Ministry special operations forces, and other missions3 Special Operations Task ForceNorth-East (USA)Bagram Airfield; operating in eastern Afghanistan Special Operations Task ForceSouth (USA)Kandahar Airfield; -
Operation Golden Gate to Connect Sangin, Musa Qal'ah Tanks Disrupt
NEWS Operation Golden Gate to connect Sangin, Musa Qal'ah Story and photos by Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr. SANGIN DISTRICT, Afghanistan – Ground was broken for the start of Operation Golden Gate in the Sangin District of Helmand province, Afghanistan, Nov. 4. Marines, sailors and soldiers are working together in an effort to build a bridge more than 24 feet wide that will span more than 150 feet across the Helmand River, allowing for easy passage for the local people. “This is a joint project to build a permanent bridging solution to connect the east and west banks of the river, “said 2nd Lt. Benjamin Nelson, mission commander for Engineer Company, Combat Logistics Battalion 2, Combat Logistics Regiment 15. The current bridge site is near the northern causeway, which once housed a bridge that connected the people of Sangin and Musa Qal’ah. “The northern causeway was the site of an existing medium girder bridge,” said Lt. j.g. James A. Bruno, platoon commander with Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 133. “Over time, the river expanded west, making it no longer feasible to have the bridge there.” (Read the STORY) Tanks disrupt enemy activity in known insurgent hotbed Story and photos by Cpl. Mark Garcia COMBAT OUTPOST SHIR GHAZAY, Afghanistan – During a time when insurgents typically bed down for the winter, Marines and coalition forces engaged multiple enemy forces during Operation Helmand Viper, Oct. 19 through 27. Tanks with Bravo Company, 2nd Tank Battalion, Regimental Combat Team 7, led the support mission for special operations forces. The operation’s focus was to find and destroy weapons caches, improvised explosive devices and drug producing facilities. -
The United States and Other Donor Countries Have Reportedly Invested $4 Billion in Afghan Roads
June 6, 2014 Mr. William Hammink USAID Mission Director for Afghanistan Dear Director Hammink: The United States and other donor countries have reportedly invested $4 billion in Afghan roads. As you know, the United States provided a significant proportion of those funds. USAID alone invested over a billion dollars in road projects in addition to hundreds of millions of dollars provided by the Department of Defense (DOD). Following conversations that I had during my trip to Afghanistan last fall, I’m concerned that the U.S. government may be supporting road projects in Afghanistan that will be unsustainable due to not being properly maintained. In Kabul, a senior U.S. government official expressed his misgivings to me regarding the efficacy of U.S. and Afghan road maintenance efforts and stated that he believed maintenance problems pose a major challenge to the sustainability of Afghanistan’s transportation network. A recent report in the Washington Post stated that Highway 1, a critical piece of Afghanistan’s transport infrastructure, is nearly impassible at certain points due to damage caused by insurgent activity, coupled with a lack of road maintenance by the Afghan government.1 It’s reported that this road was built by U.S. and coalition partners at a cost of approximately $3 billion. The Washington Post article stated that USAID ceased funding Afghan government road maintenance programs in 2012, when the agency determined that Afghan government’s road maintenance efforts were inadequate. I am concerned that roads built at great risk and expense by the U.S. and other donors are not and will not be properly maintained. -
AFGHANISTAN South
AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (25 – 31 January 2021) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2021 (AS OF 31 JANUARY) 3,430 People displaced by conflict (verified) 35,610 Received assistance (including 2020 caseload) NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 31 JANUARY) 104,470 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Internal displacement IN 2021 (AS OF 21 JANUARY) 36,496 Disruption of services Returnees from Iran 367 Returnees from Pakistan 0 South: Hundreds of people displaced by ongoing Returnees from other countries fighting in Kandahar province HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Fighting between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state armed PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & group (NSAG) continued in Hilmand, Kandahar and Uruzgan provinces. FUNDING In Kandahar, fighting continued mainly in Arghandab, Zheray and Panjwayi 1.28B districts. Ongoing fighting displaced hundreds of people in Kandahar province, but Requirements (US$) – HRP the exact number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) is yet to be confirmed. 2021 Humanitarian actors with coordination of provincial authorities are assessing the needs of IDPs and will provide them with immediate assistance. Farmers and 37.8M agricultural activities continued to be affected by ongoing fighting. All movements 3% funded (US$) in 2021 on the main highway-1 connecting Hilmand to Kandahar provinces reportedly AFGHANISTAN resumed, however improvised explosive devices (IEDs) along the highway HUMANITARIAN FUND (AHF) continue to pose a threat. 2021 In Uruzgan province, clashes between ANSF and an NSAG continued along with the threat of IED attacks in Dehrawud, Gizab and Tirinkot districts. Two civilians 5.72M were reportedly killed and eight others wounded by an IED detonation in Tirinkot Contributions (US$) district. -
Fifth Progress Report on the Implementation of the Common Set of Proposals Endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017
Fifth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017 16 June 2020 On 6 December 2016 and on 5 December 2017, EU and NATO Councils endorsed, in parallel processes, a common set of 74 proposals for the implementation of the Joint Declaration signed in Warsaw on 8 July 2016 by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission and the Secretary General of NATO. Responding to the taskings by the Ministers of both organizations, regular progress reports on implementation were submitted to the respective Councils in June and December 2017, in June 2018, as well as in June 2019. The present, fifth, report covers the period between June 2019 and June 2020. It elaborates on progress achieved in the implementation of the 74 common proposals by showcasing tangible deliverables in all areas of cooperation. In particular, the following elements can be highlighted: - Political dialogue has further intensified at all levels and settings, including in virtual formats, while maintaining the positive trend of mutual and reciprocal cross-briefings. It remains an essential and indispensable instrument for strengthening mutual understanding, building confidence and ensuring reciprocal transparency vis-à-vis the NATO Allies and the EU Member States, as well as their strong engagement. - The Structured Dialogue on military mobility at staff level continues to contribute to information sharing in the key areas of military requirements, transport infrastructure, transport of dangerous goods, customs and cross border movement permissions. - In the area of strategic communications, cooperation focused on strengthening mutual alerting on disinformation incidents and hostile information activities, as well as improving capacities related to detection, analysis and exposure to disinformation. -
WS a SECTION FEB 17 Semifinal.Indd
LINKS 4 Kids Vol. 69, No. 7 www.cherrypoint.marines.mil February 17, 2011 See A3 Hammerhead detachment returns from Afghanistan CPL. SAMUEL A. NASSO in support of I Marine Expeditionary Force MCAS CHERRY POINT (Forward). Marines, friends and families waited for For many of the young Marines, it was a more than a hundred Marines with Marine firsthand look at what it’s like being in a com- Heavy Helicopter Squadron 366 to return from bat zone during a deployment. a seven-month deployment from Camp Leath- “It was a really good experience to actually erneck, Afghanistan, Feb. 9. do what we train for,” said Cpl. Shaun D. Ber- The anticipation grew as a USO trailer with how, a CH-53E Super Stallion helicopter crew two televisions showed a video feed of the chief with HMH-366. “To move around troops homecoming Marines departing the plane at and supplies and provide support from the sky Cherry Point, allowing the families to see their felt great.” loved ones earlier than expected. The detachment consisted of 134 Marines The Hammerhead detachment left in July 2010 to join HMH-361 at Camp Leatherneck See HMH-366 page A7 CPL. SAMUEL A. NASSO CPL. SAMUEL A. NASSO Handmade signs adorn the wall of Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron 366’s hangar as Capt. Wesley R. McCray holds his daughter, Madeline, for the first time in family members converged to welcome home 134 Marines and Sailors to Cherry Point seven months with his wife, Heather, upon returning from a seven-month from a seven-month deployment to Afghanistan Feb. -
Afghanistan Orbats
Coalition Combat Forces in Afghanistan AFGHANISTAN ORDER OF BATTLE by Wesley Morgan January 2013 This document describes the composition and placement of U.S. and other Western combat forces in Afghanistan down to battalion level. It includes the following categories of units: maneuver (i.e. infantry, armor, and cavalry) units, which in most cases are responsible for particular districts or provinces; artillery units, including both those acting as provisional maneuver units and those in traditional artillery roles; aviation units, both rotary and fixed-wing; military police units; most types of engineer and explosive ordnance disposal units; and “white” special operations forces, described in general terms. It does not include “black” special operations units or other units such as logistical, transportation, medical, and intelligence units or Provincial Reconstruction Teams. International Security Assistance Force / United States ForcesAfghanistan (Gen. John Allen, USMC)ISAF Headquarters, Kabul Special Operations Joint Task ForceAfghanistan / NATO Special Operations Component CommandAfghanistan (Maj. Gen. Raymond Thomas III, USA)Camp Integrity, Kabul1 Combined Joint Special Operations Task ForceAfghanistan (USA)Bagram Airfield; village stability operations, advisors to Afghan Defense Ministry special operations forces, and other missions2 Special Operations Task ForceEast (USA)Bagram Airfield; operating in eastern Afghanistan Special Operations Task ForceSouth (USA)Kandahar Airfield; operating in Kandahar Province Special Operations Task ForceSouth-East (USN)U/I location; operating in Uruzgan and Zabul Provinces Special Operations Task ForceWest (USMC)Camp Lawton, Herat; operating in western Afghanistan and Helmand Province TF Balkh / 2-7 Infantry (Lt. Col. Todd Kelly, USA)Camp Mike Spann, Mazar-e-Sharif; operating in northern Afghanistan 3 TF Paktika / 3-69 Armor (Lt. -
Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision. -
Joint Task Force East and Shared Military Basing in Romania and Bulgaria
Occasional Paper Series STUDIES SECURITY MARSHALL FOR C. CENTER Joint Task Force East and Shared Military Basing in Romania and Bulgaria By Dorinel Moldovan, Plamen Pantev, and Matthew Rhodes GEORGE EUROPEAN No. 21 August 2009 ISSN 1863-6020 The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies is a leading transatlantic defense educational and security studies institution. It is bilaterally supported by the U.S. and German governments and dedicated to the creation of a more stable security environment by advancing democratic defense institutions and relationships; promoting active, peaceful engagement; and enhancing enduring partnerships among the nations of North America, Europe, and Eurasia. The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series seeks to further the legacy of the Center's namesake, General George C. Marshall, by disseminating scholarly essays that contribute to his ideal of ensuring that Europe and Eurasia are democratic, free, undivided, and at peace. Papers selected for this series are meant to identify, discuss, and influence current defense related security issues. The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series focus is on comparative and interdisciplinary topics, including international security and democratic defense management, civil-military relations, strategy formulation, terrorism studies, defense planning, arms control, peacekeeping, crisis management, regional and cooperative security. The Marshall Center Occasional Papers are written by Marshall Center faculty and staff, Marshall Center alumni, or by individual, invited contributors, and are disseminated online and in a paper version. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the George C.