DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents ORAU Team Document Number: ORAUT-TKBS-0006-6 NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Project Effective Date: 10/05/2006 Revision No.: 01 PC-1 Technical Basis Document for the Hanford Site – Controlled Copy No.: ______ Occupational External Dosimetry Page 1 of 80 Subject Expert: Jack Fix Supersedes: Document Owner Approval: Signature on File Date: 01/09/2004 Edward D. Scalsky, TBD Team Leader Revision No.: 00 Approval: Signature on File Date: 01/09/2004 Judson L. Kenoyer, Task 3 Manager Concurrence: Signature on File Date: 01/09/2004 Richard E. Toohey, Project Director Approval: Signature on File Date: 01/09/2004 James W. Neton, OCAS Health Science Administrator TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Record of Issue/Revisions ................................................................................................................... 5 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 8 6.1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 9 6.1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 9 6.2 External Dosimetry ...................................................................................................................... 9 6.3 Basis of Comparison ................................................................................................................. 10 6.4 Dose Reconstruction Parameters ............................................................................................. 10 6.4.1 Hanford Historical Administrative Practices ..................................................................... 11 6.4.2 Hanford Dosimetry Technology ....................................................................................... 13 6.4.2.1 Beta/Photon Dosimeters ........................................................................................ 14 6.4.2.2 Neutron Dosimeters ............................................................................................... 17 6.4.3 Calibration ...................................................................................................................... 18 6.4.3.1 Hanford Beta/Photon Dosimeters ........................................................................... 18 6.4.3.2 Hanford Neutron Dosimeters .................................................................................. 20 6.4.4 Workplace Radiation Fields ............................................................................................ 21 6.4.4.1 Hanford Beta/Photon Dosimeter Response Testing ............................................... 21 6.4.4.2 Hanford Workplace Beta/Photon Dosimeter Response .......................................... 26 6.4.4.3 Uncertainty in Beta/Photon Recorded Dose ........................................................... 26 6.4.4.4 Hanford Neutron Dosimeter Response Testing ...................................................... 30 6.4.4.5 Hanford Workplace Neutron Dosimeter Response ................................................. 33 6.4.4.6 Neutron to Photon Ratio ......................................................................................... 39 6.4.4.7 Neutron Dose Fraction ........................................................................................... 44 Effective Date: 01/09/2004 Revision No. 01 Document No. ORAUT-TKBS-0006-6 Page 2 of 80 6.4.4.8 Uncertainty in Neutron Dose .................................................................................. 46 6.5 Adjustments to Recorded Neutron Dose ................................................................................... 46 6.5.1 Neutron Dose Adjustments ............................................................................................. 46 6.5.2 Neutron Weighting Factor ............................................................................................... 47 6.5.3 Neutron Correction Factor............................................................................................... 48 6.6 Missed Dose ............................................................................................................................. 48 6.6.1 Photon Missed Dose ....................................................................................................... 48 6.6.1.1 Year ....................................................................................................................... 49 6.6.2 Neutron Missed Dose ..................................................................................................... 49 6.6.2.1 Year ....................................................................................................................... 50 6.6.2.2 Facility/Location ..................................................................................................... 50 6.6.2.3 Dosimeter Type ...................................................................................................... 51 6.6.2.4 Energy Range ........................................................................................................ 51 6.7 Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................ 51 6.7.1 Missed Dose ................................................................................................................... 51 6.7.2 Positive Recorded Photon Dose ..................................................................................... 53 6.7.3 Neutron Dose.................................................................................................................. 54 6.7.4 Organ Dose .................................................................................................................... 54 References ........................................................................................................................................ 55 Glossary ............................................................................................................................................ 60 Attachment 6E Occupational External Dose for Monitored Workers .............................................. 70 6E.0 Distribution Parameters ............................................................................................................. 71 6E.1 Years of Exposure .................................................................................................................... 71 6E.2 Rate .......................................................................................................................................... 71 6E.3 Radiation Type .......................................................................................................................... 71 6E.3.1 Beta/Photon .................................................................................................................... 71 6E.3.2 Neutron ........................................................................................................................... 72 6E.4 Distribution Parameters ............................................................................................................. 73 6E.4.1 Type ............................................................................................................................... 73 6E.4.2 Parameter 1 .................................................................................................................... 73 6E.4.2.1 Resolution of Recorded Dose Components ............................................................ 74 6E.4.2.2 Adjustments to Recorded Penetrating Dose ........................................................... 74 6E.4.2.3 Adjustments to Recorded Neutron Dose ................................................................ 75 6E.4.2.4 Unmonitored Photon Dose ..................................................................................... 76 6E.4.2.5 Missed Photon Dose .............................................................................................. 77 6E.4.2.6 Missed Neutron Dose ............................................................................................. 77 6E.4.2.7 Organ Dose ............................................................................................................ 79 6E.4.3 Parameter 2 .................................................................................................................... 80 6E.4.3.1 Hanford Workplace Recorded Dose Uncertainty .................................................... 80 Effective Date: 01/09/2004 Revision No. 01 Document No. ORAUT-TKBS-0006-6 Page 3 of 80 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 6-1 Hanford historical dosimetry events ....................................................................................... 15 6-2 Laboratory sources of uncertainty for beta/photon dosimeter calibration parameters ............................................................................................................................. 19 6-3 Analysis of two-element film dosimeter dose. ......................................................................... 20 6-4 Laboratory sources of uncertainty for neutron dosimeter calibration parameters .................... 21 6-5 IARC testing results
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neutron Interactions and Dosimetry Outline Introduction Tissue
    Outline • Neutron dosimetry Neutron Interactions and – Thermal neutrons Dosimetry – Intermediate-energy neutrons – Fast neutrons Chapter 16 • Sources of neutrons • Mixed field dosimetry, paired dosimeters F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological • Rem meters Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Introduction Tissue composition • Consider neutron interactions with the majority tissue elements H, O, C, and N, and the resulting absorbed dose • Because of the short ranges of the secondary charged particles that are produced in such interactions, CPE is usually well approximated • Since no bremsstrahlung x-rays are generated, the • The ICRU composition for muscle has been assumed in absorbed dose can be assumed to be equal to the most cases for neutron-dose calculations, lumping the kerma at any point in neutron fields at least up to 1.1% of “other” minor elements together with oxygen to an energy E ~ 20 MeV make a simple four-element (H, O, C, N) composition Neutron kinetic energy Neutron kinetic energy • Neutron fields are divided into three • Thermal neutrons, by definition, have the most probable categories based on their kinetic energy: kinetic energy E=kT=0.025eV at T=20C – Thermal (E<0.5 eV) • Neutrons up to 0.5eV are considered “thermal” due to simplicity of experimental test after they emerge from – Intermediate-energy (0.5 eV<E<10 keV) moderator material – Fast (E>10 keV) • Cadmium ratio test: • Differ by their primary interactions in tissue – Gold foil can be activated through 197Au(n,)198Au interaction and resulting biological effects
    [Show full text]
  • Absorbed Dose in Radioactive Media Outline Introduction Radiation Equilibrium Charged-Particle Equilibrium Limiting Cases
    Outline • General dose calculation considerations, Absorbed Dose in Radioactive absorbed fraction Media • Radioactive disintegration processes and associated dose deposition – Alpha disintegration Chapter 5 – Beta disintegration – Electron-capture transitions F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological – Internal conversion Physics and Radiation Dosimetry • Summary Introduction Radiation equilibrium • We are interested in calculating the absorbed dose in a. The atomic composition radioactive media, applicable to cases of of the medium is – Dose within a radioactive organ homogeneous – Dose in one organ due to radioactive source in another b. The density of the organ medium is • If conditions of CPE or RE are satisfied, dose homogeneous c. The radioactive source calculation is straightforward is uniformly distributed • Intermediate situation is more difficult but can be d. No external electric or handled at least in approximations magnetic fields are present Charged-particle equilibrium Limiting cases • Emitted radiation typically includes both • Each charged particle of a given type and photons (longer range) and charged energy leaving the volume is replaced by an particles (shorter range) identical particle of the same energy entering • Assume the conditions for RE are satisfied the volume • Consider two • Existence of RE is sufficient condition for CPE limited cases based • Even if RE does not exist CPE may still exist on the size of the (for a very large or a very small volume) radioactive object 1 Limiting cases: small object Limiting
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Activation and Prompt Gamma Intensity in Ar/CO $ {2} $-Filled Neutron Detectors at the European Spallation Source
    Neutron activation and prompt gamma intensity in Ar/CO2-filled neutron detectors at the European Spallation Source E. Diana,b,c,∗, K. Kanakib, R. J. Hall-Wiltonb,d, P. Zagyvaia,c, Sz. Czifrusc aHungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Energy Research, 1525 Budapest 114., P.O. Box 49., Hungary bEuropean Spallation Source ESS ERIC, P.O Box 176, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden cBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Nuclear Techniques, 1111 Budapest, M}uegyetem rakpart 9. dMid-Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden Abstract Monte Carlo simulations using MCNP6.1 were performed to study the effect of neutron activation in Ar/CO2 neutron detector counting gas. A general MCNP model was built and validated with simple analytical calculations. Simulations and calculations agree that only the 40Ar activation can have a considerable effect. It was shown that neither the prompt gamma intensity from the 40Ar neutron capture nor the produced 41Ar activity have an impact in terms of gamma dose rate around the detector and background level. Keywords: ESS, neutron detector, B4C, neutron activation, 41Ar, MCNP, Monte Carlo simulation 1. Introduction Ar/CO2 is a widely applied detector counting gas, with long history in ra- diation detection. Nowadays, the application of Ar/CO2-filled detectors is ex- tended in the field of neutron detection as well. However, the exposure of arXiv:1701.08117v2 [physics.ins-det] 16 Jun 2017 Ar/CO2 counting gas to neutron radiation carries the risk of neutron activa- tion. Therefore, detailed consideration of the effect and amount of neutron ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (E.
    [Show full text]
  • TUTORIAL on NEUTRON PHYSICS in DOSIMETRY S. Pomp1
    TUTORIAL ON NEUTRON PHYSICS IN DOSIMETRY S. Pomp1,* 1 Department of physics and astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden. *Corresponding author. E‐mail address: [email protected] (S.Pomp) Abstract: Almost since the time of the discovery of the neutron more than 70 years ago, efforts have been made to understand the effects of neutron radiation on tissue and, eventually, to use neutrons for cancer treatment. In contrast to charged particle or photon radiations which directly lead to release of electrons, neutrons interact with the nucleus and induce emission of several different types of charged particles such as protons, alpha particles or heavier ions. Therefore, a fundamental understanding of the neutron‐nucleus interaction is necessary for dose calculations and treatment planning with the needed accuracy. We will discuss the concepts of dose and kerma, neutron‐nucleus interactions and have a brief look at nuclear data needs and experimental facilities and set‐ups where such data are measured. Keywords: Neutron physics; nuclear reactions; kerma coefficients; neutron beams; Introduction Dosimetry is concerned with the ability to determine the absorbed dose in matter and tissue resulting from exposure to directly and indirectly ionizing radiation. The absorbed dose is a measure of the energy deposited per unit mass in the medium by ionizing radiation and is measured in Gray, Gy, where 1 Gy = 1 J/kg. Radiobiology then uses information about dose to assess the risks and gains. A risk is increased probability to develop cancer due to exposure to a certain dose. A gain is exposure of a cancer tumour to a certain dose in order to cure it.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Report Jülich High
    General Allgemeines ual Design Report ual Design Report Concept Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source Source Jülich High Brilliance Neutron 8 Conceptual Design Report Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) J. Baggemann, S. Böhm, P. Doege, J. Fenske, M. Feygenson, A. Glavic, O. Holderer, S. Jaksch, M. Jentschel, S. Kleefisch, H. Kleines, J. Li, K. Lieutenant,P . Mastinu, E. Mauerhofer, O. Meusel, S. Pasini, H. Podlech, M. Rimmler, U. Rücker, T. Schrader, W. Schweika, M. Strobl, E. Vezhlev, J. Voigt, P. Zakalek, O. Zimmer Allgemeines / General Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 Band / Volume 8 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) Gutberlet T. Brückel, T. Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) 1 100 mA proton ion source 2 70 MeV linear accelerator 5 3 Proton beam multiplexer system 5 4 Individual neutron target stations 4 5 Various instruments in the experimental halls 3 5 4 2 1 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 5 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 CONTENT I. Executive summary 7 II. Foreword 11 III. Rationale 13 1. Neutron provision 13 1.1 Reactor based fission neutron sources 14 1.2 Spallation neutron sources 15 1.3 Accelerator driven neutron sources 15 2. Neutron landscape 16 3. Baseline design 18 3.1 Comparison to existing sources 19 IV. Science case 21 1. Chemistry 24 2. Geoscience 25 3. Environment 26 4. Engineering 27 5. Information and quantum technologies 28 6. Nanotechnology 29 7. Energy technology 30 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Chemical Dosimeters Development Of
    SUDANSUDAN ACADEMYAGADEMY OFOF SCIENCES(SAS)SGIENGES(SAS) ATOMICATOMIC ENERGYEhTERGYRESEARCHESRESEARCHES COORDINATIONCOORDII\rATI ON COUNCILCOUNCIL - Development of Chemical Dosimeters A dissertation Submitted in a partial Fulfillment of the Requirement forfbr Diploma Degree in Nuclear Science (Chemistry) By FareedFadl Alla MersaniMergani SupervisorDr K.S.Adam MurchMarch 2006 J - - - CONTENTS Subject Page -I - DedicationDedication........ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I Acknowledgement ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... '" ... '" ....... .. 11II Abstract ... ... ... '" ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... -..... ... ... ... ... ... ..... III -I Ch-lch-1 DosimetryDosimefry - 1-1t-l IntroductionLntroduction . 1I - 1-2t-2 Principle of Dosimetry '" '" . 2 1-3l-3 DosimetryDosimefiySystems . 3J 1-3-1l-3-l primary standard dosimeters '" . 4 - 1-3-2l-3-Z Reference standard dosimeters ... .. " . 4 1-3-3L-3-3 Transfer standard dosimeters ... ... '" . 4 1-3-4t-3-4 Routine dosimeters . 5 1-4I-4 Measurement of absorbed dose . 6 1-5l-5 Calibration of DosimetryDosimetrvsystemsvstem '" . 6 1-6l-6 Transit dose effects . 8 Ch-2ch-2 Requirements of chemical dosimeters 2-12-l Introduction ... ... ... .............................................. 111l 2-2 Developing of chemical dosimeters ... ... .. ....... ... .. ..... 12t2 2-3 Classification of Dosimetry methods.methods .......................... 14l4 2-4 RequirementsRequiremsnts of ideal chemical dosimeters ,. ... 15 2-5 Types of chemical system .
    [Show full text]
  • The International Commission on Radiological Protection: Historical Overview
    Topical report The International Commission on Radiological Protection: Historical overview The ICRP is revising its basic recommendations by Dr H. Smith Within a few weeks of Roentgen's discovery of gamma rays; 1.5 roentgen per working week for radia- X-rays, the potential of the technique for diagnosing tion, affecting only superficial tissues; and 0.03 roentgen fractures became apparent, but acute adverse effects per working week for neutrons. (such as hair loss, erythema, and dermatitis) made hospital personnel aware of the need to avoid over- Recommendations in the 1950s exposure. Similar undesirable acute effects were By then, it was accepted that the roentgen was reported shortly after the discovery of radium and its inappropriate as a measure of exposure. In 1953, the medical applications. Notwithstanding these observa- ICRU recommended that limits of exposure should be tions, protection of staff exposed to X-rays and gamma based on consideration of the energy absorbed in tissues rays from radium was poorly co-ordinated. and introduced the rad (radiation absorbed dose) as a The British X-ray and Radium Protection Committee unit of absorbed dose (that is, energy imparted by radia- and the American Roentgen Ray Society proposed tion to a unit mass of tissue). In 1954, the ICRP general radiation protection recommendations in the introduced the rem (roentgen equivalent man) as a unit early 1920s. In 1925, at the First International Congress of absorbed dose weighted for the way different types of of Radiology, the need for quantifying exposure was radiation distribute energy in tissue (called the dose recognized. As a result, in 1928 the roentgen was equivalent in 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Sonie Applications of Fast Neutron Activation Analysis of Oxygen
    S E03000182 CTH-RF- 16-5 Sonie Applications of Fast Neutron Activation Analysis of Oxygen Farshid Owrang )52 Akadenmisk uppsats roir avliiggande~ av ilosofie ficentiatexamen i Reaktorf'ysik vid Chalmer's tekniska hiigskola Examinator: Prof. Imre PiAst Handledare: Dr. Anders Nordlund Granskare: Bitr. prof. G~iran Nyrnan Department of Reactor Physics Chalmers University of Technology G6teborg 2003 ISSN 0281-9775 SOME APPLICATIONS OF FAST NEUTRON ACTIVATION OF OXYGE~'N F~arshid Owrang Chalmers University of Technology Departmlent of Reactor Physics SEP-1-412 96 G~iteborg ABSTRACT In this thesis we focus on applications of neutron activation of oxygen for several purposes: A) measuring the water level in a laboratory tank, B) measuring the water flow in a pipe system set-up, C) analysing the oxygen in combustion products formed in a modern gasoline S engine, and D) measuring on-line the amount of oxygen in bulk liquids. A) Water level measurements. The purpose of this work was to perform radiation based water level measurements, aimed at nuclear reactor vessels, on a laboratory scale. A laboratory water tank was irradiated by fast neutrons from a neutron enerator. The water was activated at different water levels and the water level was decreased. The produced gamma radiation was measured using two detectors at different heights. The results showed that the method is suitable for measurement of water level and that a relatively small experimental set-up can be used for developing methods for water level measurements in real boiling water reactors based on activated oxygen in the water. B) Water flows in pipe.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Glossary
    Radiation Glossary Activity The rate of disintegration (transformation) or decay of radioactive material. The units of activity are Curie (Ci) and the Becquerel (Bq). Agreement State Any state with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has entered into an effective agreement under subsection 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under the agreement, the state regulates the use of by-product, source, and small quantities of special nuclear material within said state. Airborne Radioactive Material Radioactive material dispersed in the air in the form of dusts, fumes, particulates, mists, vapors, or gases. ALARA Acronym for "As Low As Reasonably Achievable". Making every reasonable effort to maintain exposures to ionizing radiation as far below the dose limits as practical, consistent with the purpose for which the licensed activity is undertaken. It takes into account the state of technology, the economics of improvements in relation to state of technology, the economics of improvements in relation to benefits to the public health and safety, societal and socioeconomic considerations, and in relation to utilization of radioactive materials and licensed materials in the public interest. Alpha Particle A positively charged particle ejected spontaneously from the nuclei of some radioactive elements. It is identical to a helium nucleus, with a mass number of 4 and a charge of +2. Annual Limit on Intake (ALI) Annual intake of a given radionuclide by "Reference Man" which would result in either a committed effective dose equivalent of 5 rems or a committed dose equivalent of 50 rems to an organ or tissue. Attenuation The process by which radiation is reduced in intensity when passing through some material.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency and Combat First Aid» Module № 1 Emergency and Combat First Aid Topic 7 Means of Mass Destruction
    Ministry of Health of Ukraine Ukrainian Medical stomatological Academy It is ratified On meeting department Of accident aid and military medicine «___»_____________20 __y. Protocol №_____ Manager of department DMSc ., assistant professor __________К.Shepitko METHODICAL INSTRUCTION FOR INDEPENDENT WORK OF STUDENTS DURING PREPARATIONS FOR THE PRACTICAL LESSON Educational discipline «Emergency and Combat First Aid» Module № 1 Emergency and Combat First Aid Topic 7 Means of Mass Destruction. First Aid. Weapons of mass destructions. Lesson 10 Radiations chemical accidents .First Aid Сourse ІІ Foreing students training dentistry Faculty Training of specialists of the second (master) level of higher of education (название уровня высшего образования) Areas of knowledge _______ 22 «Health protection»_________ (шифр и название области знаний) Specialty ________222 «Medicine», 221 «Stomatology»________________ (код и наименование специальности) Poltava 2019 The relevance of the topic: Military action in modern warfare will be carried out with high activity and limit tension. They cause great losses in the army and among the population, the destruction of potentially dangerous objects, energy centers, waterworks, the formation of large zones of destruction, fires and floods. The main form of countering in the war, is armed struggle - the organized use of armed forces and weapons to achieve specific political and military objectives, a combination of military actions of varying scales. To conventional weapons, the application of which may cause losses among the population are missiles and aerial munitions, including precision munitions volumetric detonation of cluster and incendiary. Have the greatest efficiency high precision conventional weapons, which provide automatic detection and reliable destruction of targets and enemy targets with a single shot (trigger).
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Aspects of Operating a Neutron Activation Analysis Laboratory
    IAEA-TECDOC-564 PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF OPERATING A NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS LABORATORY A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1990 PRACTICAL ASPECT OPERATINF SO G A NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS LABORATORY IAEA, VIENNA, 1990 IAEA-TECDOC-564 ISSN 1011-4289 Printe IAEe th AustriAn i y d b a July 1990 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT MISSINE TH AL F LO G PAGE THIN SI S DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK FOREWORD This boo s intendei k o advist d n everydai e y practical problems relateo t d operating a neutron activation analysis (NAA) laboratory. It gives answers to questions like "what to use NAA for", "how to find relevant research problems", "how to find users for the technique", "how to estimate the cost of the analysis and how to finance the work", "how to organize the work in a rational way d "ho"an o perforwt e qualitth m y control" givet I . s advice in choosing staff, equipment d consumableo desigt an , w nho facilitied an s s and procedures accordin neeo d availablt g an d e resources. e boo Th s designei k o discust d s problem t dealno s t wit n ordinari h A NA y textbooks, but also, in order to prevent it from being too voluminous, to avoid duplication of material described in normal NAA text books. Therefore e readeth , r will find that some materia f intereso l missins i t g from this book and it is recommended that one or two of the textbooks listed in chapter 11 be read in addition to this one.
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Dosimetry Fundamentals
    Outline • Introduction Dosimetry Fundamentals • Dosimeter model • Interpretation of dosimeter measurements Chapter 11 – Photons and neutrons – Charged particles • General characteristics of dosimeters F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry • Summary Introduction Dosimeter • Radiation dosimetry deals with the determination • A dosimeter can be generally defined as (i.e., by measurement or calculation) of the any device that is capable of providing a absorbed dose or dose rate resulting from the interaction of ionizing radiation with matter reading R that is a measure of the absorbed • Other radiologically relevant quantities are dose Dg deposited in its sensitive volume V exposure, kerma, fluence, dose equivalent, energy by ionizing radiation imparted, etc. can be determined • If the dose is not homogeneous • Measuring one quantity (usually the absorbed dose) another one can be derived through throughout the sensitive calculations based on the defined relationships volume, then R is a measure of mean value Dg Dosimeter Simple dosimeter model • Ordinarily one is not interested in measuring • A dosimeter can generally be considered as the absorbed dose in a dosimeter’s sensitive consisting of a sensitive volume V filled with a volume itself, but rather as a means of medium g, surrounded by a wall (or envelope, determining the dose (or a related quantity) for container, etc.) of another medium w having a another medium in which direct measurements thickness t 0 are not feasible • A simple dosimeter can be
    [Show full text]