DOCSLIB.ORG

ORD-10-JAP Final Implementation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ORD-10-JAP Final Implementation Report JOINT ACTION PROGRAM Final Implementation Report Document number: IC WD 047 Version: draft 1 Date: 14-Nov-2007 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Imprint Published by: ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River © ICPDR 2007 Contact ICPDR Secretariat Vienna International Centre / D0412 P.O. Box 500 / 1400 Vienna / Austria T: +43 (1) 26060-5738 / F: +43 (1) 26060-5895 [email protected] / www.icpdr.org ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Acknowledgement Firstly, we would like to thank Mr. Philip Weller, Executive Secretary of the ICPDR, for the guidance and supervision of the work. This report would not have been possible without the data delivered by the experts of the Danube Countries. So we would like to thank all members of the Pressures and Measures Expert Group. Furthermore, we would like to say many thanks to other people as far as Ms. Doubravka Nedvedova (Czech Republic), Ms. H. Hadžovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Ms Violeta Roiatchka (Bulgaria), Richard Stadler (Austria), Mr Zeljko Ostojic (Croatia), and Mr. Gheorghe Constantin (Romania) who delivered substantial contribution to the products resulting from this study. Last but not least we would like to thank Ms Veselka Pavlova (ICPDR Secretariat) for all support in preparing the report. Mihaela Popovici ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org ICPDR Secretariat ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Table of content 1 INTRODUCTION 7 2 MAIN CONCLUSIONS 9 3 JOINT ACTION PROGRAM 12 3.1 Background 12 4 ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS 15 4.1 Policy Objectives 15 4.2 Status of Legislation Dealing with Water Management 17 4.3 Main Barriers to Policy and Legal Reforms in implementing JAP 23 4.4 Actions and measures in response to JAP 25 4.5 Estimated cost for reforms concerning institutional and legal measures to respond to JAP and EU water related regulations 26 5 TASKS OF THE JOINT ACTION PROGRAM 30 5.1 Reduction of Pollution from Point Sources 31 5.1.1 Issues in need of special attention 31 5.1.2 Reporting on pollution sources 34 5.1.3 Results of JAP measures to reduce pollution 35 5.1.4 Municipal Discharges 45 5.1.5 Industrial Discharges 60 5.1.6 Agro-industrial Discharges 93 5.2 Reduction of Pollution from Non-Point Sources 104 5.2.1 Inventory of Diffuse Sources of Nitrogen and Phosphorus and propose further measures for their reduction 104 5.2.2 Programmes of non structural measures to control diffuse pollution in the Danube River Basin 118 5.2.3 Implementation of JAP national investment programs: land use sector 132 5.3 Wetland and floodplain restoration 132 5.3.1 Addressing the nutrient retention 132 5.3.2 Implementation of JAP national Investments program: wetlands 139 5.4 Improving the scope of the TNMN, in order to get it in line with the EC Water Frame Directive and to enable its timely operation 142 5.4.1 Upgrading TNMN 142 5.4.2 Joint Danube Survey 148 5.4.3 Introduction of quality control procedures: Analytical Quality Control (AQC) in the DRB 150 5.4.4 Load assessment program 152 5.5 List of Priority Substances 155 5.6 Water Quality Standards 156 5.7 Prevention of accidental pollution events and maintenance of the accident emergency warning system 158 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org 5.7.1 Inventory of accident risk spots in the Danube River Basin 158 5.7.2 Inventory of Contaminated Sites 159 5.7.3 Operation and upgrade of the Danube Accident Emergency Warning System 162 5.8 Reduction of pollution from inland navigation 164 5.8.1 Inland navigation process 166 5.9 Product controls 166 5.9.1 Mechanisms for the reduction of detergent phosphates 168 5.10 Minimizing the impacts of floods 175 5.11 Water Balance 177 5.12 River Basin Management 179 5.12.1 Danube River Basin Analysis 180 5.12.2 Significant key water management issues 188 5.12.3 Development of DRBD Overview map and preparation of thematic maps 189 5.12.4 Development of economic indicators 190 5.12.5 Progress in developing the Danube River Basin Management Plan in line with the WFD 190 5.12.6 Development of public participation strategy 194 5.12.7 Economic analysis 195 5.13 Reporting JAP 196 6 INVESTMENTS, FINANSING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION 198 6.1 Overview of environmental projects in the DRB 198 6.1.1 ICPDR Database on investments 198 7 CONCLUSIONS 209 8 ANNEXES INVESTMENTS 211 9 COUNTRY SUMARY REPORTS 212 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org IC... draft JAP Final Implementation Report 7 1 INTRODUCTION This Report addresses the status of implementation of the ICPDR Joint Action Programme (JAP), with particular attention to the introduction of policy and legal reforms and implementation of investment projects in the municipal, industrial and agricultural sectors, as well wetlands rehabilitation measures, for pollution control and nutrient reduction in the Danube River Basin. The JAP 2001-2005 reflects the general strategy for the implementation of the DRPC for the respective period. It deals i.a. with pollution from point and diffuse sources, wetland and floodplain restoration, priority substances, water quality standards, prevention of accidental pollution, floods prevention and control and river basin management. Thus, the report summarizes the achievements that have been realized through the work of the countries under the JAP for the whole period of reporting to JAP implementation - until 31 December 2005. To facilitate a better and more recent reflection of the countries efforts and achievements, in several chapters, the situation and interpretation of results was based on 2006 evidences. The countries assessment of the projects proposed in 2000 for the JAP is based on the national reports and on the reporting on the investments projects which have been included into the ICPDR database, which provides detailed information for each individual project, as well allows reporting according to the selected parameters and topics. Along the years, many projects were reconsidered, both technically and financially, for different solutions, parameters and updated costs. For these reasons, the country assessment introduces (i) planned projects, with expected pollution reduction and related costs, as being estimated in 2000, then (ii) an assessment by 31 December 2006 according to the countries reporting for the Interim Implementation Report, (iii) a final assessment for the whole period of JAP, and (iv) estimates of proposed measures under implementation, in pipeline, or in preparation in the Danube countries in line with the EU Directives. The results of the JAP will be used in the development of the Joint Program of Measures, under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). In assessing the implementation of JAP tasks, the report considers the transfer of EU water related directives (Nitrates Directive, Urban Waste Water Directive, IPPC Directive, Water Framework Directive, etc) into national policies, regulations, and compliance mechanisms. The estimated cost for reforms concerning institutional and legal measures and direct investments that have been carried out to respond to JAP tasks, is also discussed. If the national commitments do not yet include obligations towards EU directives, the assessment of JAP implementation is based on the National Environmental Action Plan of the respective country. The implementation of investment projects, taking into account municipal, industrial and agro-industrial projects, and measures for wetland restoration is analysed. This final report has been prepared based on the information from the national contributions on the ICPDR Joint Action Program implementation and the results of the ICPDR Expert Groups. Information provided by the ICPDR DABLAS database, presented in a separate chapter, was only used to create a more comprehensive frame of countries both achievements and efforts towards meeting the EU Directives requirements by 2015. Among future remaining needs, there are several projects under implementation or in pipeline, which are well prepared and do not need any further technical or financial support, but also projects in preparation, which need further technical and financial support. ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org IC... draft JAP Final Implementation Report 8 The Report includes two parts: (i) a thorough revision and assessment of policy objectives, priorities and strategies as well as water related legislation and practices in line with the ICPDR JAP; the identification of main deficiencies and necessary steps to be taken regarding policy, legal and regulatory reform, and finally the estimates on the cost for reforms concerning institutional and legal measures and (ii) direct investments that have been carried out to respond to new water related regulations linked with JAP tasks. The report has also 4 annexes (investment measures – annex 1, municipal, annex 2, industrial and agro- industrial, and annex 3, wetlands, and summary of country reports- annex 4). The compile d information provide a clear picture of the results achieved by the individual Danube countries, the policy and legal reforms, the gaps to be filled and the investment projects, which need further technical and financial support. The results may also be used as a baseline for evaluating subsequent progress at the national and regional levels in the process of preparing the River Basin Management Plan under the WFD. The structure of the Country Report follows the structure of the national reports, which are structured as follows: (1) Policy objectives (2) Status of legislation dealing with water management (in force, in progress, main deficiencies) (3) Main barriers to policy and legal reforms to water-related policy and legal reform and JAP implementation (4) Proposed actions and measures in relation to JAP (5) Estimated cost for reforms concerning institutional and legal measures to respond to JAP and new water related regulations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presoja Poplavne Varnosti in Analiza Vzrokov Poplav V Pesniški Dolini Avgusta 2009
    S. BUKOVNIK - 22 - STANJE, VZDRŽEVANJE IN B. IVANUŠA OBRATOVANJE GRAJENIH HIDROSISTEMOV Stanislav BUKOVNIK* Blaž IVANUŠA ** PRESOJA POPLAVNE VARNOSTI IN ANALIZA VZROKOV POPLAV V PESNIŠKI DOLINI AVGUSTA 2009 1. SPLOŠNO Urejanje voda in dolinskih povodij manjših hidrosistemov, kot so v Severovzhodnem delu Slovenije, reke Pesnica, Dravinja, Polskava, Sejanca, Savinja, Ledava, Ščavnica, Kobiljski potok….., se je intenzivneje pričelo v šestdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja. Osnovni cilj urejanja celotnih hidrosistemov, je bila zaščita premoženja prebivalcev in države ter izboljšati pogoje kmetovanja in kmetijske proizvodnje na ravninskih območjih ob vodotokih. Celotni sistemi so se zgradili v okviru Zelenega plana RS. Izgrajene sisteme – osnovno odvodnjo, je prevzelo v upravljanje in vzdrževanje pristojno Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor, hidromelioracijske sisteme pa Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano. Kot dober gospodar so lastniki posameznih delov sistema, vse do nedavnega, sisteme tudi vzdrževali in upravljali. Približno po letu 1990 so se pričele razmere na terenu slabšati. V zadnjem obdobju prihaja do vse pogostejših in intenzivnejših poplav ter posledično vedno večjih škod na premoženju, infrastrukturi in intenziviranih kmetijskih površinah oziroma kmetijski proizvodnji. Pogostost in povečevanje trajanja poplav, kaže na to, da se poplavna varnosti iz leta v leto slabša. Vzroki za tak trend so v sumiranju vseh dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na odvodni režim primarne in sekundarne odvodne mreže. Ti dejavniki so: 1. Posegi v prostor, ki vplivajo na vodni režim 2. Krčenje retenzijskih površin 3. Vzdrževanje sistema osnovne in sekundarne odvodnje 4. Obratovanje grajenih zadrževalnikov 5. Klimatske spremembe V nadaljevanju podajamo poplavno varnost in Analizo vzrokov zmanjševanja poplavne varnosti v Pesniški dolini oz. hidrosistema reke Pesnice na območju občin Maribor, Pesnica, Lenart in Sveta Trojica.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGRAD, V2 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 3 3 1 1 5 5 LEGRAD - CROATIA Flood - 14/09/2014 N " 0 '
    639000 640500 642000 643500 645000 646500 648000 649500 651000 16°48'0"E 16°49'0"E 16°50'0"E 16°51'0"E 16°52'0"E 16°53'0"E 16°54'0"E 16°55'0"E 16°56'0"E 16°57'0"E 16°58'0"E GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-101 Product N.: 03LEGRAD, v2 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 3 3 1 1 5 5 LEGRAD - CROATIA Flood - 14/09/2014 N " 0 ' 9 Delineation Map - Overview 1 ° 6 4 Production date: 18/09/2014 Austria Hungary N " 0 ' Slovenia 9 Serbia 1 Zagreb ° ^ 6 4 Bosnia Zala and Herzegovina Mur Nyugat-Dunantul Adriatic Sea Croatia Montenegro ! Medjimurska Italy 0 0 Somogy 0 0 0 0 zupanija 0 0 3 3 1 1 Drau 5 5 Legrad !( Del-Dunantul Koprivnicko-krizevacka zupanija N " 0 ' 8 Sjeverozapadna 1 ° 6 4 Hrvatska N " 0 ' 8 !( 1 ° Cartographic Information 6 4 1:20000 Full color ISO A1, low resolution (100 dpi) 0 ! 0 0 0 5 5 0 0,5 1 2 8 8 2 2 km 1 1 5 5 Grid: W GS 1984 UTM Zone 33N map coordinate system Tick marks: WGS 84 geographical coordinate system ± Legend Crisis Information Hydrology Flooded Area (18/09/2014) River General Information Stream Area of Interest N Canal " 0 ' 7 1 Settlements ! ° 6 Ditch 4 ! Populated Place Lake N " Residential 0 ' 7 0 0 River 1 0 0 ° 6 0 0 Agricultural 4 7 7 2 2 1 1 5 5 Cemetery Green Area Recreational Urbanized Multi-functional ! N " 0 0 0 ' 6 0 0 1 ° 5 5 6 5 5 4 2 2 Map Information 1 1 5 5 Due to severe raining in last days, extremely high water level is recorded on almost all rivers N in the northern part of Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • PRILOGA 1 Seznam Vodnih Teles, Imena in Šifre, Opis Glede Na Uporabljena Merila Za Njihovo Določitev in Razvrstitev Naravnih Vodnih Teles V Tip
    Stran 4162 / Št. 32 / 29. 4. 2011 Uradni list Republike Slovenije P R A V I L N I K o spremembah in dopolnitvah Pravilnika o določitvi in razvrstitvi vodnih teles površinskih voda 1. člen V Pravilniku o določitvi in razvrstitvi vodnih teles površin- skih voda (Uradni list RS, št. 63/05 in 26/06) se v 1. členu druga alinea spremeni tako, da se glasi: »– umetna vodna telesa, močno preoblikovana vodna telesa in kandidati za močno preoblikovana vodna telesa ter«. 2. člen V tretjem odstavku 6. člena se v drugi alinei za besedo »vplive« doda beseda »na«. 3. člen Priloga 1 se nadomesti z novo prilogo 1, ki je kot priloga 1 sestavni del tega pravilnika. Priloga 4 se nadomesti z novo prilogo 4, ki je kot priloga 2 sestavni del tega pravilnika. 4. člen Ta pravilnik začne veljati petnajsti dan po objavi v Ura- dnem listu Republike Slovenije. Št. 0071-316/2010 Ljubljana, dne 22. aprila 2011 EVA 2010-2511-0142 dr. Roko Žarnić l.r. Minister za okolje in prostor PRILOGA 1 »PRILOGA 1 Seznam vodnih teles, imena in šifre, opis glede na uporabljena merila za njihovo določitev in razvrstitev naravnih vodnih teles v tip Merila, uporabljena za določitev vodnega telesa Ime Zap. Povodje Površinska Razvrstitev Tip Pomembna Presihanje Pomembna Pomembno Šifra vodnega Vrsta št. ali porečje voda v tip hidro- antropogena različno telesa morfološka fizična stanje sprememba sprememba 1 SI1118VT Sava Radovna VT Radovna V 4SA x x x VT Sava Sava 2 SI111VT5 Sava izvir – V 4SA x x x Dolinka Hrušica MPVT Sava 3 SI111VT7 Sava zadrževalnik MPVT x Dolinka HE Moste Blejsko VTJ Blejsko 4 SI1128VT Sava J A2 x jezero jezero VTJ Bohinjsko 5 SI112VT3 Sava Bohinjsko J A1 x jezero jezero VT Sava Sava 6 SI11 2VT7 Sava Sveti Janez V 4SA x x Bohinjka – Jezernica VT Sava Jezernica Sava 7 SI1 1 2VT9 Sava – sotočje V 4SA x x Bohinjka s Savo Dolinko Uradni list Republike Slovenije Št.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    work in progress for public discussion Public Disclosure Authorized Water Resources Management in South Eastern Public Disclosure Authorized Europe Volume II Country Water Notes and Public Disclosure Authorized Water Fact Sheets Environmentally and Socially Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433, USA Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing April 2003 This publication is in two volumes: (a) Volume 1—Water Resources Management in South Eastern Europe: Issues and Directions; and (b) the present Volume 2— Country Water Notes and Water Fact Sheets. The Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ECSSD) Department is distributing this report to disseminate findings of work-in-progress and to encourage debate, feedback and exchange of ideas on important issues in the South Eastern Europe region. The report carries the names of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. For submission of comments and suggestions, and additional information, including copies of this report, please contact Ms. Rita Cestti at: 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20433, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: (1-202) 473-3473 Fax: (1-202) 614-0698 Printed on Recycled Paper Contents
    [Show full text]
  • 1. General Restrictions 9N Sundays, Public Holidays and Non-Working
    l[I Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport, 2OZO Slovenia 1. General restrictions Vehicles concerned trucks and combination vehicles with an MpW of more than 7.51 Prohibition on all road sections listed below, in both directions: 9n Sundays, public holidays and non-working days from 08h00 to 21h00; ' on Good Friday from 14h00 to 21h00. Road sections l.Tunnel Karavanke - Ljubljana concerned A2 Tunnel Karavanke - Kranj - Ljubljana (Kozarje junction) 2. Kranjska Gora - Nova Gorica R1-206 Kranjska Gora - Vrsic - Trenta - Bovec R1-203 Predel - Bovec - Kobarid G2-102 Robic (ltalian border)- Kobarid - perseti 3. Korensko Sed/o - Podkoren - Lesce - podtabor R1-201 Korensko sedlo (Austrian border)- podkoren - Mojstrana * Hrusica R3-637 Hrusica - Javnornik - Zirovnica - Vrba G1-8 Vrba - Lesce - Crnivec H'l Crnivec - Lesnica 4. Podtabor - Ljubljana R2-411 Podtabor - Naklo R2-412 Naklo (Kranj west)- Kranj - Kranj (Labore) R1-211 Kranj (Labore)- Jeprca - Ljubtjana (Sentvid) G1-8 Ljubljana (Sentvid)- Ljubtjana (ring) 5. Ljubljana - Visna Gora - Bic - Pluska A2 Ljubljana (Malence)- Visna Gora - Bic - ptuska 6. Ljubljana - Obrezje G2-106 Ljubljana (Rudnik) - Skoftjica - Smarje Sap Hl Pluska - Trebnje - Karteljevo A2 Novo Mesto (Hrastje)- Smednik - Krska Vas - Obrezje (Border with Croatia) 7 . Sentilj * Trojane - Ljubljana (motorway) A1 Border crossing Sentilj * Pesnica H2 Pesnica - Maribor (Tezno) A1 Maribor (Ptujska Cesta) - Stivnica - Cetje - Arja Vas - Vrasnko- Trojane Blagovica - Ljubljana (zadobrova) 8. Senfi/J - Pesnica R2-437 Border crossing Sentilj - pesnica 9. Maribor - Ljubljana R2-430 Maribor - Slivnica - St. Bistrica - St. Konjice - Celje R2-447 Medlog - zalec - sempeter - Locica - irojane - Blagovica -Trzin G2-104 Trzin - Ljubljana (Crnuce) - Ljubljana (Tomacevo) 10. Ljubljana ring H3 Ljubljana (Zadobrova) - Ljubljana (Tomacevo) - Ljubljana (Koseze) A1 Ljubljana (Zadobrova) - Ljubljana (Malence) - Ljubljana (Kozarje) A2 Ljubljana (Koseze) - Ljubljana (Kozarje) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • 95/2006, Uredbeni
    PRILOGA Priloga: deli vodnih teles površinskih voda, na katerih se pravica do uporabe hidroelektrarne na podlagi pravnomočnega uporabnega dovoljenja spreminja v koncesijo za proizvodnjo električne energije v hidroelektrarnah do 10 MW Površinska voda Potencialna (Ime vodotoka, na Kota zgornje Kota spodnje energija Pretok faktor katerem je del vodnega Občina vode vodnega vode vodnega vodnega Št. Q pretočnosti telesa, ki se rabi za (Ime) telesa telesa telesa (m3/s) Fp** proizvodnjo električne Hzg (m.n.m.) Hsp (m.n.m.) Wp* energije) (MWh/leto) 1 Temnak Tolmin 455,00 400,00 0,140 0,263 174 2 Batava Tolmin 591,00 507,00 0,032 0,119 27 3 Medvedji potok Tolmin 480,00 419,00 0,030 0,233 37 4 Poreznica Tolmin 840,00 740,00 0,060 0,426 219 5 Manjški potok Idrija 635,00 591,00 0,030 0,201 23 6 Čerinščica Cerkno 473,00 454,00 0,080 0,840 110 7 Cerknica Cerkno 518,00 480,00 0,110 0,171 61 8 Zapoška Cerkno 668,00 592,00 0,070 0,320 146 9 Črna Cerkno 521,12 470,00 0,155 0,242 165 10 Črna Cerkno 591,00 552,66 0,155 0,143 73 11 Oresovka Cerkno 425,00 383,00 0,145 0,131 69 12 Zapoška Cerkno 331,00 325,00 0,150 0,201 16 13 Črna Cerkno 635,00 600,00 0,120 0,030 11 14 izvir Tresilo Kobarid 607,00 547,00 0,015 0,201 16 15 Tbin Tolmin 370,00 170,00 0,100 0,030 51 16 Kamnica Tolmin 230,00 215,00 0,035 0,324 15 17 Volarja Tolmin 192,00 185,00 0,700 0,195 82 18 Volarja Tolmin 198,00 192,00 0,350 0,507 91 19 Hočki potok Hoče- Slivnica 538,00 505,00 0,100 0,161 46 20 Piskrski potok Ruše 688,00 345,00 0,080 0,380 896 21 Oplotnica Sl.Bistrica 600,00 550,00 1,800 0,296 2286 22 Bistrica Ruše 317,20 293,59 0,100 0,068 14 23 Dovžanka Mislinja 595,70 587,30 0,200 0,443 64 24 Velka Podvelka 397,60 394,40 1,200 0,416 137 25 Kamniška Bistrica- Domžale mlinščica 327,11 325,00 1,800 0,370 121 26 Lašek Solčava 820,00 710,00 0,074 0,183 128 27 Zavratnikov potok Luče 780,00 640,00 0,012 0,063 9 28 Stoglejski gr.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of the Rate of Construction and of Rock
    Influence of the rate of construction and of rock mass strength reduction on the stability of deep cuts in marl Influence de taux de construction et de reduction de resistance de roche sur la stabilite des deblais profonds dans la marne K. Štern Geoinženiring d.o.o. - Maribor office, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT During geotechnical monitoring of anchored retaining structure and marl rock mass in conditions where marl is sensitive to variations in water content, the question appeared if design investigations in such cases generally overestimate strength and stiffness parameters. Another question is concerned with the extent and amount of changes in rock mass properties and with the influence of the construction rate and sequence. It was found out that the process of secondary humidification of the slope is directly related to the progress of works. The recorded increase of marl water content was on average 1.2% and the average decrease of uniaxial compressive strength was 28 %. RÉSUMÉ Au suivi des conditions de sols de fondation et des ouvrages ancres dans les marnes sensibles a l'humidite de la partie nord-est de la Slovenie, des questions sont posees de savoir si les parametres de resistance de la roche, suffisants et de qualite, obtenus a partir des recherches, sont surestimes, dans quelle mesure a l'arriere-pays les conditions suite a l'excavation sont egales aux conditions en phase de recherches, et de quelle maniere le taux de construction ou de l'excavation de la roche agissent sur la condition entiere et la modification des parametres de resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tipi Hidrografskih Območij V Gričevjih Severovzhodne Slovenije Glede Na Značilnosti Reliefa in Prsti
    giss15_2020_gis 09-10.qxd 28.8.2020 7:55 Page 53 Modeliranje pokrajine, 53–71, Ljubljana 2020 TIPI HIDROGRAFSKIH OBMOČIJ V GRIČEVJIH SEVEROVZHODNE SLOVENIJE GLEDE NA ZNAČILNOSTI RELIEFA IN PRSTI dr. Mauro Hrvatin, dr. Manca Volk Bahun ZRC SAZU, Geografski inštitut Antona Melika [email protected], ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-8736 [email protected], ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-9541 dr. Dénes Lóczy University of Pécs, Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences [email protected], ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-6775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610504696_04 UDK: 911.2:556.166(497.41) 551.4:556.166(497.41) IZVLEČEK Tipi hidrografskih območij v gričevjih severovzhodne Slovenije glede na značilnosti reliefa in prsti Nadzor nad poplavami je učinkovitejši, če vodo zadržujemo že v povirjih, s čimer preprečimo prehitro in neobvladljiv o stekanje vode v nižje dele porečja. Sodobno integrirano in trajnostno upravljanje s porečji zahteva ponovno ovrednotenje obstoječih ukrepov za zmanjševanje prehitrega odtoka vode in preprečeva- nje poplav. Ti obsegajo tradicionalne in sodobne pristope. V prispevku smo glede na reliefne in pedološke razmere z razvrščanjem v skupine določili sedem tipov hidrografskih območij v gričevjih severovzhodne Slovenije. Za vsako skupino hidrografskih območij so značilne svojevrstne odtočne razmere, ki pomem- bno vplivajo na pogostost in obseg poplav. KLJUČNE BESEDE relief, prst, poplava, geografski informacijski sistem, razvrščanje v skupine, gričevje, Slovenija ABSTRACT Types of hydrographic areas in the low hills of northeastern Slovenia according to the landscape and soil characteristics Flood control can be more efficient if it retains runoff in the higher sections of watersheds before concen- tration of runoff increases to an extent where inundations cannot be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Slovenia
    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Β-Estradiol and Ethinyl-Estradiol Contamination in the Rivers of the Carpathian Basin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library This manuscript is contextually identical with the following published paper: Avar, P., Zrínyi, Z., Maász, G., Takátsy, A., Lovas, S., G.-Tóth, L., Pirger, Z. (2016) β-Estradiol and ethinyl-estradiol contamination in the rivers of the Carpathian Basin. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(12) pp. 11630-11638. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6276-2 The original published pdf available in this website: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11356-016-6276-2 β-estradiol and ethinyl-estradiol contamination in the rivers of the Carpathian Basin Péter Avara*, Zita Zrínyi b, Gábor Maász a,b, Anikó Takátsya, Sándor Lovasb, Lászlo G.-Tóthc, Zsolt Pirgerb aDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, University of Pécs, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary; bAdaptive Neuroethology, Department of Experimental Zoology and cDepartment of Hydrozoology, Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Tihany, H-8237, Hungary *Corresponding author: [email protected], 0036-72-536-000/31659 Keywords: β-estradiol, ethinyl estradiol, freshwater, river, estrogen, steroid Abstract 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2), which are environmental estrogens have been determined with LC-MS in freshwater. Their sensitive analysis needs derivatisation and therefore is very hard to achieve in multiresidue screening. We analysed samples from all the large and some small rivers (River Danube, Drava, Mur, Sava, Tisza and Zala) of the Carpathian Basin and from Lake Balaton. Freshwater was extracted on solid phase and derivatised using dansyl-chloride.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Danube River Basin
    Water Quality in the Danube River Basin - 2016 TNMN – Yearbook 2016 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Imprint Published by: ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River Overall coordination and preparation of the TNMN Yearbook and database in 2017 & 2018: Lea Mrafkova, Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava in cooperation with the Monitoring and Assessment Expert Group of the ICPDR. Editor: Igor Liska, ICPDR Secretariat © ICPDR 2018 Contact ICPDR Secretariat Vienna International Centre / D0412 P.O. Box 500 / 1400 Vienna / Austria T: +43 (1) 26060-5738 / F: +43 (1) 26060-5895 [email protected] / www.icpdr.org ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Table of content 1. Introduction 4 1.1 History of the TNMN 4 1.2 Revision of the TNMN to meet the objectives of EU WFD 4 2. Description of the TNMN Surveillance Monitoring II: Monitoring of specific pressures 5 2.1 Objectives 5 2.2 Selection of monitoring sites 5 2.3 Quality elements 10 2.3.1 Priority pollutants and parameters indicative of general physico-chemical quality elements 10 2.4 Analytical Quality Control (AQC) 11 2.5 TNMN Data Management 12 3. Results of basic statistical processing 13 4. Profiles and trend assessment of selected determinands 16 4.1 Mercury in fish 33 4.2 Macrozoobenthos saprobic index 36 4.3 Sava and Tisza Rivers 37 5. Load Assssment 40 5.1 Introduction 40 5.2 Description of load assessment procedure 40 5.3 Monitoring Data in 2016 40 5.4 Calculation Procedure 42 5.5 Results 44 6.
    [Show full text]