Iraqi Security Force Order of Battle Published at Montrose Toast Written by DJ Elliott
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
12 NOV 07 Crossed Sabers:Crossed Sabers Jan 20.Qxd.Qxd
Iraqi Army “Junior Hero” Red Legs Vie to be Best Iraqi Emergency Visits School Field Artillery Crew in Top Responders Work Gun Competition Together Page 7 Page 16 Page 20 Volume I, Issue 25 Telling the MND-Baghdad Story Monday, Oct. 12, 2007 Photo by Maj. Michael J. Indovina Troops of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 18th Military Police Brigade await the departure on their flight, a Air Force aircraft into Baghdad International Airport. Brigade Arrives in Iraq By Sgt. Daniel D. Blottenberger 18th Military Police Brigade Public Affairs CAMP VICTORY, Iraq— In eager silence Soldiers of the Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 18th Military Police Brigade walked through manmade paths aligned with barriers on their way from Baghdad International Airport to Camp Victory here. Soldiers from the 18th Military Police Brigade deployed from Mannheim Germany, recently completed their final stage of in pro- cessing and training into the Middle Eastern theater in Kuwait, and arrived here in Iraq to their final destination for its upcoming 15 month deployment mission. The final training and in-processing in Kuwait focused on tasks specific for this area of operation. (Photo by Cpl. Nathan Hoskins, 1st ACB, 1st Cav. Div. Public Affairs) “From the stories I’ve heard, I expected the area to be in chaos with bombs going off everywhere, but once I got here I found that doing my job as a personnel clerk was not much different from ‘Witch Doctors’ Begin Journey Home what I am used to doing elsewhere,” said Spc. Anthony Henderson, With 15 months of medical evacuation missions behind them, Soldiers from Company C, 2nd a native of Memphis, Tenn., and a human resources specialist with “Lobo” Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment, 1st Air Cavalry Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, load the unit. -
Research Notes
RESEARCH NOTES The Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ No. 38 ■ Oc t ober 2016 How to Secure Mosul Lessons from 2008—2014 MICHAEL KNIGHTS N EARLY 2017, Iraqi security forces (ISF) are likely to liberate Mosul from Islamic State control. But given the dramatic comebacks staged by the Islamic State and its predecessors in the city in I2004, 2007, and 2014, one can justifiably ask what will stop IS or a similar movement from lying low, regenerating, and wiping away the costly gains of the current war. This paper aims to fill an important gap in the literature on Mosul, the capital of Ninawa province, by looking closely at the underexplored issue of security arrangements for the city after its liberation, in particular how security forces should be structured and controlled to prevent an IS recurrence. Though “big picture” politi- cal deals over Mosul’s future may ultimately be decisive, the first priority of the Iraqi-international coalition is to secure Mosul. As John Paul Vann, a U.S. military advisor in Vietnam, noted decades ago: “Security may be ten percent of the problem, or it may be ninety percent, but whichever it is, it’s the first ten percent or the first ninety percent. Without security, nothing else we do will last.”1 This study focuses on two distinct periods of Mosul’s Explanations for both the 2007–2011 successes and recent history. In 2007–2011, the U.S.-backed Iraqi the failures of 2011–2014 are easily identified. In the security forces achieved significant success, reducing earlier span, Baghdad committed to Mosul’s stabilization security incidents in the city from a high point of 666 and Iraq’s prime minister focused on the issue, authoriz- per month in the first quarter of 2008 to an average ing compromises such as partial amnesty and a reopen- of 32 incidents in the first quarter of 2011. -
Iraq Horrific Scenes in the Streets of Ramadi
10 February 19, 2016 News & Analysis Iraq Horrific scenes in the streets of Ramadi Nermeen Mufti anti-ISIS campaign in November or as a tactic to free them from ISIS. 2015 led by the Kurdish peshmerga “The retreating militants de- forces and backed by coalition air stroyed houses, demolished bridg- Ramadi strikes. es, public buildings and the main Iraqi forces are likely next to set university here before they fled.” treet scenes in the liberat- their eyes on Falluja, an ISIS-held He pointed out that Iraqi forces ed districts of Ramadi look city in Anbar east of Ramadi. Fal- seized Ramadi’s general hospital, horrific. It is a ghost town luja’s recapture is crucial to cut trapping ISIS fighters inside. littered with debris and supply lines from Syria into Iraq, “We refrained from attacking smashed concrete with de- primarily to Mosul, Iraq’s second the building but ISIS militants set Sstroyed vehicles and burned shop- largest city in the north under ISIS explosives to the first floor as they fronts. Stray cats nibbled on human control. escaped,” he said. bodies. Army units were on guard In the streets of Ramadi, scenes as bomb squads hastened to clear “The retreating were excruciating. The city was de- homes and streets of explosives. serted of inhabitants. Houses were The city and its suburbs, the capi- militants destroyed damaged or destroyed. Palm trees tal of the vast Anbar province, is in houses, demolished that once decorated the streets ruins and chaos. The area, which bridges, public were burned, as were cars, trucks witnessed the humiliating defeat buildings and the and other vehicles. -
Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security
Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Updated March 29, 2006 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom succeeded in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, but Iraq remains violent and unstable because of Sunni Arab resentment and a related insurgency, as well as growing sectarian violence. According to its November 30, 2005, “Strategy for Victory,” the Bush Administration indicates that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq until the country is able to provide for its own security and does not serve as a host for radical Islamic terrorists. The Administration believes that, over the longer term, Iraq will become a model for reform throughout the Middle East and a partner in the global war on terrorism. However, mounting casualties and costs — and growing sectarian conflict — have intensified a debate within the United States over the wisdom of the invasion and whether to wind down U.S. involvement without completely accomplishing U.S. goals. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is showing important successes, demonstrated by two elections (January and December 2005) that chose an interim and then a full-term National Assembly, a referendum that adopted a permanent constitution (October 15, 2005), progress in building Iraq’s security forces, and economic growth. While continuing to build, equip, and train Iraqi security units, the Administration has been working to include more Sunni Arabs in the power structure, particularly the security institutions; Sunnis were dominant during the regime of Saddam Hussein but now feel marginalized by the newly dominant Shiite Arabs and Kurds. -
The Demand for Responsiveness in Past U.S. Military Operations for More Information on This Publication, Visit
C O R P O R A T I O N STACIE L. PETTYJOHN The Demand for Responsiveness in Past U.S. Military Operations For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4280 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0657-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Air Force/Airman 1st Class Gerald R. Willis. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Department of Defense (DoD) is entering a period of great power competition at the same time that it is facing a difficult budget environment. -
Measuring Security and Stability in Iraq
MMMeeeaaasssuuurrriiinnnggg SSStttaaabbbiiillliiitttyyy aaannnddd SSSeeecccuuurrriiittyyy iiinnn IIIrrraaaqqq December 2007 Report to Congress In accordance with the Department of Defense Appropriations Act 2007 (Section 9010, Public Law 109-289) Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii 1. Stability and Security in Iraq .................................................................................................1 1.1. Political Stability......................................................................................................1 National Reconciliation...........................................................................................1 Political Commitments.............................................................................................1 Government Reform ................................................................................................3 Transnational Issues.................................................................................................5 1.2. Economic Activity...................................................................................................8 Budget Execution.....................................................................................................8 IMF Stand-By Arrangement and Debt Relief..........................................................9 Indicators of Economic Activity..............................................................................9 -