Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62w112cg Journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29 ISSN 1364-0321 Authors Hernandez, RR Easter, SB Murphy-Mariscal, ML et al. Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 766–779 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy R.R. Hernandez a,b,n, S.B. Easter b,c, M.L. Murphy-Mariscal d, F.T. Maestre e, M. Tavassoli b, E.B. Allen d,f, C.W. Barrows d, J. Belnap g, R. Ochoa-Hueso h,S.Ravia, M.F. Allen d,i,j a Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA b Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA c Ecofactor, Redwood City, CA, USA d Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA e Departamento de Biología y Geología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain f Department of Botany and Plant Science, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA g U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Moab, UT, USA h Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, 2751, New South Wales, Australia i Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA j Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: Renewable energy is a promising alternative to fossil fuel-based energy, but its development can require Received 22 February 2013 a complex set of environmental tradeoffs. A recent increase in solar energy systems, especially large, Received in revised form centralized installations, underscores the urgency of understanding their environmental interactions. 29 July 2013 Synthesizing literature across numerous disciplines, we review direct and indirect environmental Accepted 11 August 2013 impacts – both beneficial and adverse – of utility-scale solar energy (USSE) development, including impacts on biodiversity, land-use and land-cover change, soils, water resources, and human health. Keywords: Additionally, we review feedbacks between USSE infrastructure and land-atmosphere interactions and Biodiversity the potential for USSE systems to mitigate climate change. Several characteristics and development Conservation strategies of USSE systems have low environmental impacts relative to other energy systems, including Desert other renewables. We show opportunities to increase USSE environmental co-benefits, the permitting Greenhouse gas emissions Land use and land cover change and regulatory constraints and opportunities of USSE, and highlight future research directions to better Photovoltaic understand the nexus between USSE and the environment. Increasing the environmental compatibility Renewable energy of USSE systems will maximize the efficacy of this key renewable energy source in mitigating climatic and global environmental change. & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . 767 2. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy systems . 768 2.1. Biodiversity . 769 2.1.1. Proximate impacts on biodiversity . 769 2.1.2. Indirect and regional effects on biodiversity . 769 2.2. Water use and consumption . 770 2.3. Soil erosion, aeolian sediment transport, and feedbacks to energetic efficiency . 770 2.4. Human health and air quality . 770 2.5. Ecological impacts of transmission lines and corridors . 771 2.6. Land-use and land-cover change . 771 2.6.1. Land-use dynamics of energy systems . 771 2.6.2. Land-use of utility-scale solar energy . 771 2.6.3. Comparing land-use across all energy systems . 773 3. Utility-scale solar energy, land-atmosphere interactions, and climate change . 773 n Corresponding author. Department of Environmental Earth System Science, 51 Dudley Lane, Apt 125, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Tel.: þ1 650 681 7457. E-mail address: [email protected] (R.R. Hernandez). 1364-0321/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041 R.R. Hernandez et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 766–779 767 3.1. Utility-scale solar energy and albedo . 773 3.2. Utility-scale solar energy and surface roughness . 773 3.3. Utility-scale solar energy and climate change . 773 4. Utility-scale solar energy co-benefit opportunities . 774 4.1. Utilization of degraded lands . 774 4.2. Co-location with agriculture . 775 4.3. Hybrid power systems. 775 4.4. Floatovoltaics . 775 4.5. Photovoltaics in design and architecture . 775 5. Minimizing adverse impacts of solar energy: Permitting and regulatory implications . 775 6. Solar energy and the environment: Future research . 776 6.1. Research questions addressing environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy systems . 776 6.2. Research questions addressing utility-scale solar energy, land-atmosphere interactions, and climate change. 776 6.3. Research questions addressing utility-scale solar energy co-benefit opportunities . 776 6.4. Research questions addressing permitting and regulatory implications . 776 7. Conclusion.........................................................................................................776 Acknowledgements . 777 References.............................................................................................................777 1. Introduction positive aspects – reduction of greenhouse gases, stabilization of Renewable energy is on the rise, largely to reduce dependency degraded land, increased energy independence, job opportunities, on limited reserves of fossil fuels and to mitigate impacts of acceleration of rural electrification, and improved quality of life in climate change ([58, 110, 150]). The generation of electricity from developing countries [17,126] – that make it attractive in diverse sunlight directly (photovoltaic) and indirectly (concentrating solar regions worldwide. power) over the last decade has been growing exponentially In general, solar energy technologies fall into two broad worldwide [150]. This is not surprising as the sun can provide categories: photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power more than 2500 terawatts (TW) of technically accessible energy (CSP). Photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into electric current, over large areas of Earth′s surface [82,125] and solar energy whereas CSP uses reflective surfaces to focus sunlight into a beam technologies are no longer cost prohibitive [9]. In fact, solar power to heat a working fluid in a receiver. Such mirrored surfaces technology dwarfs the potential of other renewable energy tech- include heliostat power towers (flat mirrors), parabolic troughs nologies such as wind- and biomass-derived energy by several (parabolic mirrors), and dish Stirling (bowl-shaped mirrors). The orders of magnitude [150]. Moreover, solar energy has several size and location of a solar energy installation determines whether Fig. 1. Annual installed grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) capacity for utility-scale (420 MW) solar energy schemes and distributed solar energy schemes (i.e., non- residential and residential) in the United States. Total PV capacity was 900 MW in 2010; approximately double the capacity of 2009. Data reprinted from Sherwood [114]. Photo credits: RR Hernandez, Jeff Qvale, National Green Power. 768 R.R. Hernandez et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 766–779 it is distributed or utility-scale. Distributed solar energy systems environmental properties underscores the importance of under- are relatively small in capacity (e.g.,o1 megawatt [MW]). They standing environmental interactions associated with solar energy can function autonomously from the grid and are often integrated development, especially at regional and global scales and how into the built environment (e.g., on rooftops of residences, com- these impacts may reduce, augment, or interact with drivers of mercial or government buildings; solar water heating systems; global environmental change. portable battlefield and tent shield devices; [25,102]). Distributed Here, we provide a review of current literature spanning solar contrasts strikingly with utility-scale solar energy (USSE) several disciplines on the environmental impacts of USSE systems, enterprises, as the latter have relatively larger economies of scale, including impacts on biodiversity, water use and consumption, high capacity (typically 41 MW), and are geographically centralized soils, human health, and land-use and land-cover change, and —sometimes at great distances from where the energy will be land-atmosphere interactions, including the potential for USSE consumed and away from population centers. In the United States systems to mitigate climate change. Drawing from this review, we (US), solar energy has grown steadily over the past decade and show (1) mechanisms to integrate USSE environmental co-benefit rapidly in recent years (Fig. 1). The USSE capacity in this country opportunities, (2) permitting and regulatory issues related to quadrupled in 2010 from 2009, while both residential and nonresi- USSE, and (3) highlight key research needs to better understand dential capacity increased over 60% during that same period. Similar
Recommended publications
  • RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Attendees
    Company Name: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Event Title: RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Event Date: 14-Jul-15 Event Time: 9:00 AM PPT Name Company 1 Abram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Scource 2 Alison Khalaf Pristine Sun 3 Angela Plummer Pristine Sun 4 Avram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Storage 5 Boyega Ajayi SolarReserve 6 Carolyn Campbell Recurrent Energy 7 Cynthia Hernandez Ormat Nevada Inc 8 Daniel Kim Westlands Solar Park 9 David Bruder Lockheed Martin 10 David Moran Drilling And Trenchi 11 Davin Arvonen Rds Properties 12 Deborah Builder 8 Minutenerty 13 Dipa Sharif ConEdison Development 14 Ed Cook E.ON 15 Eric Larson 8minutenergy Renewables 16 Erin Kenney Anahau Energy 17 Eun Gi Chung 8minutenergy Renewables 18 Frank Mossburg Boston Pacific Company 19 Fred Hanks Cal-Pacific Carbon 20 Fred Vaske 8minutenergy 21 Genevieve Liang Mirasol Development 22 Hans Stullken North State Solar 23 Harrison Luna Hecate Energy 24 Jack Pigott First Solar 25 James Cook First Solar 26 James Kelly Nrg Renew Llc 27 Jamie Nagel ZGlobal 28 Jason Joner Modoc Capital 29 Jennifer Desrosier SunEdison 30 Jennifer Hunt FuelCell Energy 31 Joe Briney sPower 32 John Barnes Solar Land Partners.Inc 33 John Monahan JCM Associates 34 jonathan Mancini Bridgewell Resources 35 Jonathan Rappe Soldevco 36 Josh Martin Westlands Solar Park 37 Joshua Martin Westlands Solar Park 38 Julian Chapa Julian Chapa 39 Kathryn Malone Edf Renewable Energy 40 Kayvon Deldawr SPower 41 Kenneth Quigley Cal-Pacific Carbon, LLC 42 Lee Kossla Colemko Llc 43 Marvis Averett Drilling World 44 Matt Barnes Grid Subject Matter Experts, LLC 45 Mhe Uruville Dell Toll Energy 46 Michael Joh Eight Minute Energy 47 Michael Morianti Abengoa Solar 48 Nicole Lepre Con Edison Development, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Construction Development
    Major Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated March 7, 2016 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all major solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time-scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility-scale solar power. This list includes ground-mounted solar power plants 1 MW and larger. Example Projects Nevada Solar One Sierra SunTower Nellis Air Force Base DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center Developer: Acciona Developer: eSolar Developer: MMA Renewable Ventures Developer: Florida Power & Light Co. Electricity Purchaser: NV Energy Electricity Purchaser: Southern Electricity Purchaser: Nellis AFB Electricity Purchaser: Florida Power & California
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Projects in Development !( City Yreka D E L N O R T E !( C O U N T Y
    A B C D E F G H I J California 2 ¨¦§5 ¤£101 Crescent Renewable Energy Projects in Development !( City Yreka D e l N o r t e !( C o u n t y S i s k i y o u M o d o c with Existing and Approved Transmission Lines C o u n t y C o u n t y Alturas !( Updated 12/17/2015 Prepared by the California Energy Commission ¤£395 3 Renewable Energy Projects Approved Transmission Projects in Development CAISO Approved Project New Line S h a s t a H u m b o l d t C o u n t y Eureka C o u n t y Biomass/ Solar PV !( (! IID Approved Project New Line L a s s e n !( C o u n t y Landfill Gas 1 - 20 MW Weaverville IID Approved Project Increased Voltage !( (! Geothermal (! 21 - 200 MW ¨¦§5 ! ( Small Hydro (! 201 - 2,400 MW LADWP Approved Project New Line 101 Redding !( ¤£ T r i n i t y !( (! C o u n t y Wind Other Features (! Solar Thermal (! Susanville City !( )" Existing Transmission Line Existing Substation* )" 4 Red Approved Substation* Bluff 345 - 500kV !( Road Te h a m a C o u n t y 200 - 287kV County Boundary ¤£395 110 - 161kV Desert Renewable Energy Quincy !( P l u m a s * NOTE: Only substations for approved C o u n t y Conservation Plan Boundary B u t t e transmission lines shown on map ÆÄ99 C o u n t y Chico !( G l e n n C o u n t y S i e r r a Downieville C o u n t y Willows !( 101 !( Oroville ¤£ !( M e n d o c i n o C o u n t y 5 Yu b a N e v a d a C o u n t y C o u n t y ¨¦§80 !( Nevada City !( L a k e Colusa !( C o u n t y !( Ukiah C o l u s a Yuba !( C o u n t y !( City Marysville !( !( !( P l a c e r C o u n t y Lakeport !( ¨¦§5 S u t t e r C o
    [Show full text]
  • A PATH FORWARD Identifying Least-Conflict Solar PV Development in California’S San Joaquin Valley MAY 2016
    A PATH FORWARD Identifying Least-Conflict Solar PV Development in California’s San Joaquin Valley MAY 2016 Authorship The primary authors of this report are: Dustin Pearce, Conservation Biology Institute, Goleta, CA James Strittholt, Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, OR Terry Watt, Terrell Watt Planning Consultants, San Francisco, CA Ethan N. Elkind, Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE), University of California, UC Berkeley School of Law, CA Additional contributions were provided by Jim Bartridge (Senior Transmission Program Specialist, California Energy Commission), Thomas Gates (Supervisor, Cultural Resources, California Energy Commission), Gabriel Roark (Energy Analyst, Cultural Resources, California Energy Commission), Jeffrey Billinton (Manager, Regional Transmission-North, California Independent System Operator [CAISO]), Steve Chung (Navy Region Southwest [NRSW] Regional Community Plans Liaison Officer [CPLO]), Daniel Gergely Szabo (Researcher, UC Berkeley School of Law) and Patrick Mealoy (Strategic Resource Advisors LLC). Acknowledgements The authors and organizers are grateful to both the Energy Foundation and Hewlett Foundation for their support for the convenings and policy paper. We would specifically like to thank Katie McCormack for her commitment to this work. Generous donations and grants from Granville Homes, Maricopa Orchards, Westlands Solar Park LLC, Duke-American Transmission Co., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, The Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Defense Council (Ralph Cavanagh and Carl Zichella), and Southern California Edison matched this foundation support. We are also grateful for the in-kind assistance from the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, California Energy Commission, and California Independent System Operator, as well as project development help from Steve Black. Report design by Claire Hermann. Photos are courtesy of Green Energy Futures, David Dodge, Samuel Huckins, Mike Trimble, Daniel Arndt, Steve Sullivan, brotherlywalks, Morning Calm Weekly Newspaper Installation, and Jared Zimmerman.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework
    Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies (EGNRET) Of Energy Working Group (EWG) (May 2014) Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework APEC Project: EWG 24 2012A -- Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework Produced by Beijing QunLing Energy Resources Technology Co., Ltd For Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2014 APEC Secretariat APEC Publication number : APEC#214-RE-01.8 Page 2 of 170 Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework Operation Technology of Solar Photovoltaic Power Station Roof and Policy Framework Content 1 Introduction.............................................................................................8 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Project Goal................................................................................................... 12 1.2.1 Solar Resources Analysis.......................................................................... 12 1.2.2 PV Technology Development .................................................................... 12 1.2.3 Policy Review ............................................................................................ 12 1.2.4 PV
    [Show full text]
  • Major Solar Projects.Xlsx
    Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated January 17, 2012 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all utility‐scale solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time‐scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility‐scale solar power. This list includes ground‐mounted utility‐scale solar power plants larger than 1 MW that directly feed into the transmission grid. This list does not include large "behind the meter" projects that only serve on‐site load. One exception to this is large projects on military bases that only serve the base (see, for example, Nellis Air Force Base). While utility‐scale solar is a large and growing segment of the U.S. solar industry, cumulative installations for residential and non‐residential (commercial, non‐profit and government) solar total 841 MW and 1,634 MW, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility-Scale Solar Projects in The
    APL000043 10/21/2011 UtilityScaleSolarProjectsintheUnitedStates Operating,UnderConstruction,orUnderDevelopment UpdatedOctober14,2011 Overview Thislistisforinformationalpurposesonly,reflectingprojectsandcompletedmilestonesinthepublicdomain.Theinformationinthislistwasgathered frompublicannouncementsofsolarprojectsintheformofcompanypressreleases,newsreleases,and,insomecases,conversationswithindividual developers.Itisnotacomprehensivelistofallutilityscalesolarprojectsunderdevelopment.Thislistmaybemissingsmallerprojectsthatarenot publiclyannounced.Particularly,manysmallerprojectslocatedoutsideofCaliforniathatarebuiltonashorttimescalemaybeunderrepresentedon thislist.Also,SEIAdoesnotguaranteethateveryidentifiedprojectwillbebuilt.Likeanyotherindustry,marketconditionsmayimpactproject economicsandtimelines.SEIAwillremoveaprojectifitispubliclyannouncedthatithasbeencancelled.SEIAactivelypromotespublicpolicythat minimizesregulatoryuncertaintyandencouragestheaccelerateddeploymentofutilityscalesolarpower. Thislistincludesgroundmountedutilityscalesolarpowerplantslargerthan1MWthatdirectlyfeedintothetransmissiongrid.Thislistdoesnot includelarge"behindthemeter"projectsthatonlyserveonsiteload.Oneexceptiontothisislargeprojectsonmilitarybasesthatonlyservethebase (see,forexample,NellisAirForceBase). WhileutilityscalesolarisalargeandgrowingsegmentoftheU.S.solarindustry,cumulativeinstallationsforresidentialandnonresidential (commercial,nonprofitandgovernment)solartotal712MWand1,233MW,respectively.FormoreinformationontheU.S.solarmarket,visit www.seia.org/cs/research/solarinsight.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology
    California Flats Solar Project EIR Section 5.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology 5.0 CUMULATIVE SCENARIO AND METHODOLOGY 5.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS According to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(1), “a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (EIR) together with other projects causing related impacts.” In addition, an EIR must discuss cumulative impacts if the incremental effect of a project, combined with the effects of other projects is “cumulatively considerable” [Section 15130(a)]. Such incremental effects are to be “viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects” [Section 15164(b)(1)]. Together, these projects comprise the cumulative scenario which forms the basis of the cumulative impact analysis. A cumulative impact analysis should highlight past actions that are closely related (either in time or location) to the project being considered, catalogue past projects and discuss how past projects have harmed the environment, and discuss past actions, even if they were undertaken by another agency or another person. Both the severity of impacts and the likelihood of their occurrence are to be reflected in the discussion, “but the discussion need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion of cumulative impacts shall be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and shall focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact” [Section 15130(b)].
    [Show full text]
  • Photovoltaics from Wikipedia
    Photovoltaics from Wikipedia PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:32:21 UTC Contents Articles Photovoltaics 1 Solar cell 13 List of photovoltaic power stations 29 References Article Sources and Contributors 45 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 47 Article Licenses License 48 Photovoltaics 1 Photovoltaics Photovoltaics (PV) is a method of generating electrical power by converting solar radiation into direct current electricity using semiconductors that exhibit the photovoltaic effect. Photovoltaic power generation employs solar panels composed of a number of solar cells containing a photovoltaic material. Materials presently used for photovoltaics include monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, and copper indium gallium selenide/sulfide. Due to the increased demand for renewable energy sources, the manufacturing of solar cells and photovoltaic arrays has Nellis Solar Power Plant at Nellis Air Force Base advanced considerably in recent years. in the USA. These panels track the sun in one axis. Solar photovoltaics is a sustainable energy source.[1] By the end of 2011, a total of 71.1 GW[2] had been installed, sufficient to generate 85 TWh/year.[] And by end of 2012, the 100 GW installed capacity milestone was achieved.[3] Solar photovoltaics is now, after hydro and wind power, the third most important renewable energy source in terms of globally installed capacity. More than 100 countries use solar PV. Installations may be ground-mounted (and sometimes integrated with farming and grazing) or built into the roof or walls of a building (either building-integrated photovoltaics or simply rooftop).
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Scale Solar Projects in California: an Initial Survey
    UTILITY SCALE SOLAR PROJECTS IN CALIFORNIA: AN INITIAL SURVEY A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning By Meaghan Mroz-Barrett June 2015 2015 Meaghan Mroz-Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Utility Scale Solar Projects in California: An Initial Survey AUTHOR: Meaghan Mroz-Barrett DATE SUBMITTED: June 2015 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Adrienne Greve, Ph.D. Associate Professor of City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Michael Boswell, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Chris Clark, J.D. Lecturer of City and Regional Planning iii ABSTRACT Utility Scale Solar Projects in California: An Initial Survey Meaghan Mroz-Barrett The lack of a comprehensive database for both concentrating and photovoltaic utility-scale solar power projects, those with a generation capacity of greater than 50 MW, hinders the ability of researchers and policy makers to examine the state of solar development in the state of California. This research project seeks to fill this gap in understanding by creating a database of proposed and developed projects in order to examine trends in proposals, process time, approvals, and construction starts. Existing literature was evaluated to determine potential factors for project success in approval and construction. Upon determination of these factors, the project database was developed through use of publicly available data and extensive Internet searches of planning documents, industry releases, and articles on existing and proposed projects. The completed database, containing eighty projects, was analyzed to provide an initial look at the overall state of solar project development in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description
    2. Project Description 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2.1.1. Overview of Westlands Solar Park and WSP Gen-Tie Corridors Plan The overall project covered by this EIR includes two main elements, consisting of: 1) the Westlands Solar Park (“WSP”) Master Plan, which is an overall plan of development for solar generating facilities within WSP; and 2) the Westlands Solar Park Generation-Interconnection Tie-Line Corridors Plan (“WSP Gen-Tie Corridors Plan”), which is the route plan for high-voltage transmission corridors to provide interconnection and capacity for delivery of WSP-generated power to the State electrical grid at Gates Substation. These main project elements are interrelated and mutually supportive, and for the sake of brevity are also referred to as the Westlands Solar Park and WSP Gen-Tie Corridors. The main plan elements and their settings are shown in Figures PD-1 and PD-2 and are briefly described below. 1) Westlands Solar Park (WSP) Master Plan – The WSP Master Plan is intended to serve as the planning framework for a series of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generating facilities on about 21,000 acres in west-central Kings County, generally located south of SR-198, west of SR-41 and the Kings River, and east of the Fresno County Line. The combined generating capacity of WSP solar projects is estimated to be 2,000 MW, although the final power output could increase with improved solar PV module efficiency over the course of the WSP buildout period. The solar PV projects developed within WSP would have varying generating capacities, with the power output from the solar facilities ranging up to about 250 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Arica Solar Project and Victory Pass Solar Project Environmental
    BLM U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-CA-D060-2020-0009-EA (Arica Solar) DOI-BLM-CA-D060-2020-0010-EA (Victory Pass Solar) Arica Solar Project and Victory Pass Solar Project August 2021 Preparing Office: Palm Springs–South Coast Field Office 1201 Bird Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 Tel. 760-833-7100 ARICA SOLAR PROJECT AND VICTORY PASS SOLAR PROJECT 2021 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION.................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................... 3 1.4 SCOPING AND ISSUES ................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Issues for Detailed Analysis...............................................................................4 1.4.2 Issues Eliminated from Detailed Analysis .........................................................5 1.5 TIERING AND REFERENCE........................................................................................... 6 1.6 CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE PLANS, LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES ..... 7 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................8
    [Show full text]